F.H. BRADLEY: Interview with Prof. Jean-Paul Rosaye

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 5. 08. 2024
  • I interview Jean-Paul Rosaye, professor of of British studies and the history of ideas at Universite d’Artois. Rosaye is an expert on British Idealism and has translated Bradley's Appearance and Reality into French (link to his translation below).
    NOTE: This is an edited version of our discussion. A full version (over 2 hours long) is available to members.
    In our discussion, Rosaye focuses on the historical context of Appearance and Reality and three sections of the work that provide a good 'way in' and overview of Bradley's metaphysical thinking. As such, this interview provides a good starting point for the detailed chapter by chapter discussions available to members.
    NOTE: Prof. Rosaye's microphone sometimes rubs on his jacket when he reads from the book. Apologies for the interruptive noises that result.
    A free readable online copy of Appearance and Reality can be found here:
    archive.org/details/appearanc...
    A free online PDF can be found here:
    www.holybooks.com/wp-content/...
    Jean-Paul Rosaye's French translation is available here:
    www.amazon.fr/Apparence-r%C3%...
    #Interview #FHBradley #AppearanceAndReality
    ____Video Contents____
    00:00 - Introduction
    00:41 - The background of Appearance and Reality
    03:25 - The nature of, and need for, metaphysics (A&R Introduction)
    12:04 - How subjective is metaphysics?
    15:35 - Metaphysics and culture
    21:18 - Clarifying the main thesis (A&R Appendix introduction)
    38:36 - Thought and Reality (Chapter 15)
    45:12 - The relativity of knowledge controversy
    50:37 - Burying the thing-in-itself
    51:43 - The solution: 'the other' as both transcendent and imminent in thought
    57:56 - British idealism as a fourth-way metaphysics
    ____Channel description____
    I am a graduate of Cambridge University with a PhD in Philosophy. My thesis was on the nature of truth, and I specialise in metaphysics, logic, and the history of analytic philosophy. I believe philosophy should be made accessible to the curious and philosophers have a duty to reenter the public debate on the questions of importance to our age. This channel is my attempt to do that!
    On a personal level, I am a lucky husband, and proud father of two young boys that keep me very much grounded!
    ____Memberships____
    To take the ideas I explore on this channel to the next level with in-depth videos and more academic content, please become a member. Most of the videos I produce are exclusive to members. There are also options here to get in touch with me and do philosophy together. Also, with your support I will be able to spend more time reading, thinking, writing, and shooting video content for all you good people! But I need to keep my family fed too, so your membership is GREATLY appreciated.
    It's a simple equation: more members = more videos. Thanks!

Komentáře • 7

  • @Haromicprocesser
    @Haromicprocesser Před 4 měsíci +1

    Great channel Thankyou !

  • @Assemblagem
    @Assemblagem Před rokem +3

    Thank you, Professor Rosaye! As a Whiteheadian scholar myself, it is always fascinating to listen about Bradley's works, the possibilities for connections are very inspiring!

    • @miguelfonseca1104
      @miguelfonseca1104 Před 4 měsíci +1

      if you interested in bradley and whitehead i strongly suggest you check out Samuel Alexander a very underrated metaphysician who has a position somewhere in between, (a monist like bradley, but instead of pan-experientialism everything is composed of space-time)

  • @ChristianSt97
    @ChristianSt97 Před rokem +3

    this was great! thank you

  • @TheVeganVicar
    @TheVeganVicar Před rokem +1

    I was expecting an ancient recording of Bradley himself - that is what occurs when one stays up all night binge-watching AC/DC videos. ;)

  • @8k35Philosophy
    @8k35Philosophy Před rokem

    Great content man

  • @kengemmer
    @kengemmer Před 5 měsíci

    The microphone noise was annoying and made it difficult to follow the discourse. I picked up a few pointers. Thanks.