Polaris Has A Release Date - New Drake Ship & All Things Ships & Vehicles | Star Citizen
Vložit
- čas přidán 19. 05. 2024
- Consider Becoming a Patron?: / supermacbrothers
Become a channel member: / @supermacbrother
Subscribe To My Channel: / supermacbrothers
Come hang out on Twitch: / supermacbrother
TOBII:
-The Tobii Eye Tracker 5 is 5% OFF using my code 'supermacbrother' or following this link, while also giving my channel a kick back. Thank you: tobii.gg/Supermacbrother
-It was all happening this month in the world of Star Citizen, with Invictus Launch Week in full swing, the release of many new vehicles, plus a detailed Q&A on all things ships and vehicles, including a new Drake concept ship on the way and the expected release date of the RSI Polaris.
DISCOUNTS & SUPPORTING MY CHANNEL:
GAMEGLASS:
-Get 5% Off any GameGlass purchase while also giving my channel a kick back. Thank you: gglass.link/smb
MONSTERTECH:
-Get 5% off any MonsterTech products using code 'SMB' while also giving my channel a kick back. Thank you: www.monster.tech/en/
VKB:
-get 5% off any VKB when you use discount code 'supermacbrother' at checkout: flightsimcontrols.com
-Living Off-Grid in Star Citizen Playlist: tinyurl.com/44hwmwec
MY VIDEOS:
-Star Citizen Sunday: tinyurl.com/5ckyxcrh
-Latest SHIPS & VEHICLES Info: tinyurl.com/fujh73m5
-Latest 3.23 Patches & Roadmap: tinyurl.com/3347vyep
-Star Citizen 3.23 My Thoughts: tinyurl.com/jxb26pye
-Star Citizen at its Finest: tinyurl.com/3sp554un
-Most Impactful Features: tinyurl.com/ry7ve7y5
-Creatures Are Here: tinyurl.com/42ev6fyh
-CRAZY 800 Player Tests: tinyurl.com/42rwz3hc
-PU Monthly Report: tinyurl.com/3dufwxyx
-Letter From Chris Roberts SC 1.0: tinyurl.com/mwez2djj
-The BEST Features of Star Citizen Alpha 3.23: tinyurl.com/2hyrbzct
-Server Meshing Test Success: tinyurl.com/35m7bthj
-Star Citizen 3.23 Will Blow Your Mind: tinyurl.com/2uxrcv3c
-Are You Playing Star Citizen Wrong?: tinyurl.com/2fr49b4b
-The Economy, Cargo & Rep: tinyurl.com/4uw69pkb
-Other 2024 Features: tinyurl.com/m37zbexa
-Zero To Hero season 2: tinyurl.com/5339xhjs
-Star Citizen will EXPLODE this year: tinyurl.com/2p8v93eb
-Ships & Vehicles of 2024: tinyurl.com/4udeujk3
-Star Citizen is on ANOTHER LEVEL!!: tinyurl.com/2mr9t54p
Get Star Citizen Here + 5000 UEC Bonus: robertsspaceindustries.com/en...
Do me a favour? Hit that like button as it really helps my channel get noticed plus subscribe if you like what you see :)
Support Me & My Channel:
When shopping on Amazon: go.magik.ly/ml/l14/
DONATE | streamlabs.com/supermacbrothe...
SMB MERCH | bit.ly/2cs1904
TWITTER | @supermacbrother
INSTAGRAM | SuperMacBrothers
FACEBOOK | supermacbrothers
BUSINESS ENQUIRIES | supermacbrothers@gmail.com
Music Used:
-Miguel Johnson: migueljohnson.bandcamp.com/
-Pedro Macedo Camacho
-Geoff Zanelli
-Unofficial Soundtrack to Star Citizen
All info in this video is available to view at the RSI website found here: robertsspaceindustries.com
Star Citizen is an open development, crowd funded project from Cloud Imperium. Consisting of 2 games, Squadron 42 a single player, story driven campaign putting you in the middle of the Vanduul attacks as an up and coming UEE Navy pilot, and Star Citizen, a highly detailed
first person MMO set within a persistent universe where there are no limits. This includes, space, and ground aspects, massive spaceships with full interiors and interactions, a full dynamic economy which reacts to the players actions allowing for anything you can imagine.
It is all being built on the StarEngine (a modified version of Amazon's Lumberyard Engine).
Please bare in mind that this is heavily WIP and in an alpha state in which much of the foundational tech to make it a reality is still being developed. Both games do not have set release dates yet but you can play the alpha build for the PU MMO which makes consistent progress
with quarterly patch releases throughout the year.
I am an independent content creator and a fan of the game, I am not paid by Cloud Imperium however I do accept ships from them to giveaway to my community but this will by no means influence my opinion or what I say and believe about the project.
#starcitizen #supermacbrother #squadron42 - Hry
It would be wise for CIG to postpone death of a spaceman until the game is in a better state.
thats never stopped them before.
Just scrap the whole fucking concept. Its so fucking stupid. I already died, lost all my stuff in my ship, maybe lost the ship if it was bought ingame without LTI, why does my character need to just be penalized further? I lost my time, progress, and materials. Why do I need to have further punishment inflicted on me? How is that going to encourage me to get into engagements with other players or extremely difficult NPC encounters, as opposed to only ever playing it safe?
@@nuclearsimian3281this is a space sim not call of duty. Maybe go play arena commander to fill your now now now void
I hate the concept so much, its a game, it should be a fun experience and being penalized so harshly for something that might just be a bug or a murderhobo who gets their kicks from hurting legit players is just cruel and stupid.
Definitely needs to be in a better state. Don’t like the new respawn changes. Think the game should be hard.
There will be another sabre variant this year he said. "It will be the one most people thought this would be." - John crew. So I'm guessing a quantum snare since those were the most comments I saw leading up to firebird release.
missile boat actually
@@yulfine1688 huh?
@@PerplexedVet you were guessing it had a quantum snare, the firebird is a missile boat.
Not the Firebird, there’s another variant coming
I'm thinking the new Sabre variant will be the "Super Sabre" that everyone was speculating about when the Sabre Raven was introduced. Basically, an upgunned 2-seat Sabre Raven chassis with a remote player-controlled turret.
I'm calling it now! The Drake concept is the Leviathan! The first player-owned Battlecruiser!
No. They are done with huge ships for awhile.
@@SpaceDad42 according to whom?
who wants another concept ship lmao while so many are still in the list of Soon. 14 capital ships in the waiting list 1 per year ahmmm
Another Saber variant coming as well.
If it came out right now there would be far more negativity about it now that it's next to impossible to hit a multi-crew npc ship with torpedos. Maybe by November its primary ordinance will be usable, I think the delay is a good thing. Make sure it's worth the price tag, then release.
Trust me, if you like delays, you're going to LOVE this ship. Its going to be so delayed, that it will NEVER release. Remember when their release date was 2016?
No the delay is NOT a good thing. The wait alone has already way outran the price tag. We have designed and built actual aircraft carriers that have sailed around the world and fought wars in less time than it has taken them to design this ship. Just shove it out ready or not otherwise I'm going to be winning my class action lawsuit. You can work on it more after its out, but just get it out, otherwise the class action suit will bankrupt the entire game for everything else.
@@SD-vd3mh Well, for an example, we dont have to ensure the insides of aircraft carriers obey the laws of physics so that people dont do unatural things like fall into space when exiting a turret and that fighter you just landed in the hanger doesnt bounce around and explode unexpectedly.
It took 9 years to build Gerald R. Ford, 10,000 people, 90 companies and $17 or $18 billion dollars. To say there is any comparison there is a stretch.
@@korellian To say a video game in development for over 10 years isn't a scam is a stretch.
@@korellian Just curious, what do you think a reasonable timeframe would be? Like is there a point at which you would say the development is taking too long? Like hypothetically if you lived 100 more years and it still wasn't out would that be too long? Or would you continue to defend it all the way to the heat death of the universe?
One other question I have is do you think most people who bought it were educated that 10 years was an expected reasonable amount of time?
Not trying to be a jerk, I'm genuinely interested in your answers.
Thanks for the update, Mac!
The new drake ship could be a heavy fighter since drake doesn't have one in their line up? What do you all think?
Then my question is this... WHY CIG do you Sell ships that do not have gameplay in development for those ships in the foreseeable future? Sounds more like, Hey! here is an idea we have, by this concept ship, and maybe one day within the next decade we will develop gameplay for it, test it for another five years and then create the ship you have bought for it.
I really like the new spawn implementation. Add some resources being used up and you can balance it however its needed.
The respawn being hidden behind a carrack/890j always felt a bit of a money grab.
They should make respawn fluid that you store on the ship. If you forget it or run out of this resource, you can't respawn.
Maybe can't respawn on a ship. Hospital respawn should still be possible for a decent credit cost
You mean get x amount of Kopion horns which can be processed and added to your med bed to make new bones for regen.
They really need to focus on gold-standarding existing ship for a 1.0 release. Plus changing the monitization model to me more sustainable. If they dont this game will die
Absolutely, the funding this year is far behind the last two and their expenses only increased. 4.0 won't make up for it, everything there is long overdue and there's nothing worth spending more money on. 4.0 won't bring in the masses as it's overall the same buggy "demo", just bigger. I wouldn't say CIG goes bankrupt but they need to turn SC into a proper game if they want it to appeal to the average gamer.
yes, it's best to work on what is already released that needs updates rather than adding too much stuff and end up with a lot of somewhat functional mess
quality > quantity
their bet on money making is sq42.
Would love for them to give further info on the two BUKs I have on my account for my Warden as well as all the other fun modular ship stuff... I am looking at you Cat..
I just noticed, in the MISC Logo there is also the Umbrella Logo, does MISC have a Bio Division by any chance??
Hey wait a minut-
I think the respawn capability needs to be linked to both a ressource and a limitation: the bed should have a "body" limit and should be loaded before the mission. For a Nursa, i think you should have a 1 spare bodiy/respawn (1 chance of recovery and bring your vehicles and loot back), those spare bodies should be loaded from another bed or a hospital before leaving. This way medical gameplay could involve a ship ferrying blank imprint around to revive people, but require the medic to go and scan the downed player, or reload empty beds to let player respawn on their own beds. If medics recover a body, it could give your imprint back instead of holding you back waiting for help...
They have actually said it will be limited by resources you will have to load into the med bed that will be consumed. You can see the slots to the left of the bed under the terminal
I think using medical supplies as a resource would fill this role well. This effectively limits respawns by the amount of med supplies the vehicle can carry, as they take up physical space. So to get more spawns from a nurse you would likely have to bring another ship/vehicle to supply it.
Like that idea....also thought of a recharge time perhaps. Maybe you can die once or twice in a short time frame before it needs to "recharge"..or reset. Dying then would send you back to primary residence.
I've also been thinking about the body limit. I don't think it should have that strict a body limit, but the resources for the printer should take up some space, thus limiting its use. That alone will limit how many people you'd want to be able to use your bed, leaving some autonomy of choice to players. The amount of body patterns the buffer can hold could be limited by bed size, and as the Nursa is a 3 crew craft, plus an emergency pickup, it would make sense that a size 3 bed should be able to buffer at least 4 patterns. It could scale with bed size. Just my thoughts.
I love the idea of harvesting body components from corpses.
I was very excited for the respawning changes. I think you should be rewarded for coming prepared.
As for the Drake ship, I really hope its that cool upgraded Caterpillar that made the rounds a while ago but idk how trust worthy that leak was. I think it will end up being something mid-sized since they're already got a lot of work to do on the backlog of capital ships to get through and adding another big backlog ship seems counterintuitive.
Ground vehicles do need some tuning.
The new Nursa actually feels pretty good (with a little jank, and overly loud audio). The ROC feels nice as well (needs a little more power to get up those little hills).
So we know they can get them to be decent in the mean time.
I'm calling the new bike No Pulse. That thing is deadly!
This respawn thing has my concerns, but the community will talk this out until we're blue. I'll just sit back with my popcorn and watch the show. Reminds of the ship insurance conversation that has gotten nowhere.
Dried corpse starch and clone juice has come up in conversation with my friends.
Where do we get that green armor?
Be interesting to see how this pans out in the coming months
CIG full of shit when they said " med bed spawning at any tier was always the intent" the amount of receipts that prove other wise are flooding spectrum. Im not a fan cause it just prompts more solo play and less care if u die if u can just keep spawning.
also the fact that CR killed PO cause he didnt want ships spawning in thin air and wanted to slow players down when getting back into the fight... yet now bodies spawn in thin air and now u can skip all the travel time spawning where u die CIG is a walking contradiction
Welcome to star citizen sunday on monday
I am curious how the MPUV ships will be different once you can just swap modules. Or will they just be renamed to MPUV w/cargo module
It will likely be mpuv w/ module you own
im consider to upgrade my carrack to polaris or the nautilius but in doubth..
What is the reason for having tiers at medbay now. Because everyone who needs healing (and it doesn't matter what kind of injury they have) just goes into the Ursa or another ship with a medbay, and kill himself. Then, in a new body, he just comes to his corpse, takes his gear and is ready for the next fight.
They simply had an idea, but again failed to think through all the implications.
Instead of a med bay they have now created a cloning facility.
As you said it for the current gameplay, you are correct. Besides the range of respawn (and what injuries they can heal) all MedBeds are the same. But we all know that development has stages. Implementation of the supplies for both healing and regeneration are NOT IN yet the place for having them is in place for when it arrives. This plus the detrimental effects of regeneration will be important in the future but not yet.
@@ericwollaston5654 I know what you're thinking. But when Medbay allows full respawn, any regeneration is unnecessary. And the moment they change it again, the current sale of Ursa and the like will look like a scam. And people will be angry again because CIG will take away what it sold them.
Their greed drives them on very thin ice.
If they keep the respawn on all tiers, I'd say the most straightforward balancing thing to do would be to make the DNA decay lower on higher tier beds. The more "invested" character you have, the less likely you'd want to respawn in an ursa.
@@piktasniekas8124 We'll see what they do.
In my opinion, it would be good to have two respawn points to choose from. Mobile (Vehicle / Ship) and static (Station / City).
With the logic of respawn in a mobile spawnpoint -> if it is not in range respawn in a static one.
Or let people choose where they want to respawn every time they die.
The game (character) currently lacks any meaningful progression (besides basic reputations). And tying respawn time to money spent is bullying.
A much better option would be to tie the respawn time to the reputation with the most influential corporation in the area or to the reputation with the corporation in whose compound the mission takes place. And with the possibility that if you have a negative reputation, the mobile respawn will be disabled, because the activation of the clone will be interfered in some way (after your death, the activation code will not be transferred to the mobile station). There are many ways to treat this.
What I wanted to say with the first post was that people now have no reason to heal their injuries, especially because the low Medbays (tier) cannot heal major injuries and it is more efficient for them to just go to it to have their gear ready and then kill themselves. After respawning, they will use the gear from the old body.
And of course I also want to say that CIG once again made something up, but they didn't think through all the implications. It just seems to me that they don't have enough creative people to see things through. It's always only about 50%... We will do something and somehow it will turn out...
They act like they are creating the very first game in the world and make completely pointless and stupid mistakes. They could learn from the other games, but I feel like their egos won't allow it.
Does anyone know which ships are actually on the "10 most multicrewed ships" list?
master modes is not bad, but giving people with laser repeaters 10 shots before running out and having to wait to recharge bends logic, it is boring and makes encoutners uneccesarily difficult.
Yes you can go all cannons. but even then it is not fun to constantly be waiting for the canons to recharge...
I'm looking for an origin G12 medical
That's disappointing about the Polaris, I was hoping they'd say like next month or after Invictus.
There's no inside? how would it be 1 month
1 month is a speedrun for something that requires the level of polish that makes star citizen great. 8 years is one hell of a stretch though but they had to get their tech first before working on these ships... i guess...
@@echo5827 judging by the progress crunch they made up until February they got sweaty with other horseshit they wanted to release this year and pulled some peeps off of it and they could have had it out by 4.0 easily.
Well how bout that, some ass on Reddit was trying to argue with me about the Polaris's development/release and then here we are.
Still no word on the release of the Merchantman and the rework for the Origin 600i...But the release of the Polaris this year soothes the pain 😃
As a bmm owner, I have no desire for it to be in the game right now. I'd have nothing to do in it except flex like 890J owners.
buhuh are you sure they will release it :) CIG has said that with other ships lol
Release the Kraken!
Can you put chapters in your CZcams videos?
Death of a Spaceman’s big issue is that it (currently) lacks any compelling reason to exist in terms of gameplay. For this mechanic to succeed, it must make the game more fun and fulfilling - not just more frustrating (which is how it currently sounds). See Dark Souls - entire game loops are designed around making death an interesting and compelling core mechanic, therefore it works great. SC can’t lean on realism and “being hardcore” alone here. Dying is already insanely tedious to begin with, the last thing we need is for it to become an even greater slog.
PER-SE-US! PER-SE-US! PER-SE-US!
When is IAE, this year?
The NURSA is so amazing and fun to the players that CIG MUST f**k it up. Let´s enjoy it while its fun and awesome.
I guess exploration gameplay... #soon after 4.0
Why doesn't the Firebird have missiles AND lasers? I don't get the reason for the restriction. I swear, the devs have dumb design choices for their ship designs sometimes. And why have ships at all that are not available for people to get? $800 million freaking dollars for this game! 12 blasted years I've been waiting for this game to get attractive enough to get into. It's inching along but I'm still waiting!
😊❤
The Intel Raven deal must have an end date, it can't be a contract in perpetuity, when CIG have said on that all ships will be available in the verse
Devs have explicitly stated that the Raven contract is permanent, as CIG does not own the rights to the ship, Intel does, and CIG is only licensed for its *use*. In the same interview, they stated they aren't even sure it will be available in game, later. I would link you the article with the page with the transcription of the interview, but I'm on a short break and I'm sure you can find it. Many others have. IIRC it was in a Question and Answer. It isn't a "deal" issue, it's an ownership rights issue tied up in trademark and copyright law. That's why the ship is an Intel logo colored/themed data runner. So unless CIG manages to get them to sell the rights, it's a done deal.
So reskin it and call it mk2
@@dnash2131 That isn't how those laws or contracts work. There are likely (as it would have been stupid for Intel's lawyers not to, and they aren't stupid) special provisions within the document relating specifically to loadout and function as well, as I suggested earlier. The fact that the Firebird now exists at all and is not the "reskin" everyone wants, myself included, is due to this. We are lucky we they were able to do what they did. Having dealt with copyright law before, this is what they are alluding to with their carefully worded responses regarding this. It is the same reason you can't make an exact copy of the Whopper and sell it with a different color wrapper while calling it the Whatever. Despite all the money CIG has made, they've already spent it, and they likely don't have the money to buy the rights. You can keep your finders crossed for a windfall, but I wouldn't hold your breath.
@@dnash2131 That isn't how copyright law works. As I stated earlier, loadout was likely included in the agreement, as alluded to by CIG's replies in the Q&A. They can't just "reskin," and they likely can't buy the rights from them. Not going into why again, it's an obvious waste of time. Good luck to you.
They really need to step up production of capital ships. I dont care how but at this pace, new big ships for sale wont be bought anymore because if it takes a year for 1 ships we will need another 15 years to release all promised ships. Thats just not realistic
nothin on the new drake ship? kinda click baity my guy
No *Wee Woo* Lights for Nursa is pathetic.
At what point in the video do you mention the Polaris? I had to quit watching because of a busy schedule. It happened with another content creator yesterday. The title said that we have a release date and they babbled on for 15 minutes before I had to shut down the video and leave. So, I have 35 minutes into two videos with "Release date for the Polaris in their titles and still do not know.
Why are they doing gold standard work on a ship that the smallest percentage of people have versus ships that have been needing love forever like all the starter ships, most Drake ships, etc?
And misc ships!
To sell the firebird
the firebird is literaly a joke. underwhelming 2 weapons need a boost to next tier and needs double much more like triple the missiles.
Dates mean nothing in SC lol!
imagine trying to clean blood, shit and vomit from the million little cracks, lines and crevice's in the ursa medical...
yay. the polaris has a dae. shame 90% of the player base doesnt have that kinda cash to drop on a single ship.. should have realized the ship that got me to put my first 45 down was going to be a pricy boy.. shrugs.i got my starrunner
Death of a spaceman is just such a terrible idea for a game with combat. Not to mention the sheer amount of bugs that can just instantly kill you
❤️🙂👍👌🎊💐💪😊😉😘🙏🎂😍
I bought a polaris instead of a kraken because I know drake and other companies have more capital ships coming one day. I’m hoping for something like the Pegasus becoming player owned.. I want to be the guy who gets contracted into transporting an entire fleet to large scale battles. In the meantime, i’m the guy you’ll hire to pull up in a polaris and down the enemies capital ships for salvaging. I don’t want a kraken these days because it has no shields over landing pads forcing ships to use their own weaker shields and walking from the kraken to your ships won’t be possible while in motion or you’d get thrown off the deck
I hope this game takes at least another four years before they start polishing it just so this woke fad happening in the world right now can come to an end and force CIG to cater to the older backers again along with the younger ones.
Raven, a complete non issue ship for me. Firebird, just as zero as I have never found missiles to be functional due to server lag and usual bugs, meaning it makes extra noise and nothing more.
When Nursa sales drop enough the marketing team will pull the respawn from tier 3 beds. wonder how far the alpha will have reached and how close this project will be to beta when my time on this world ends?
wow everyone totally wanted the sabre to get a gold standard and a new variant!
Seriously though why do they spend time on things like this that nobody really asked for, when there's SO MANY other ships that need to be brought up to standards.
To the med beds Rember when the cutlas red you could respawn in .. their answer is total BS. total dummycrap answer rewrite history and hope people forgot.
Tired of cig implementing new stupid ships every year instead of finishing much older ones.
They already have so much money.
mute
he copy passte boerdgamers vidoes
You do realize they both just copy and paste any news from CIG. That is why they are the same.
Thank you for the update
Less annoying voice though
Death of a spaceman is dumb. It doesn't mean anything. It's just a fog. There's no meaningful death that they have communicated that isn't the laziest concept with no detail. The fact that they don't have a clear direction for any part of this game whatsoever is exhausting.
Womp womp cope more seethe more hater
It's a sandbox like EVE Online; the players set the direction within the contraints of what the developers put in.
If you need directed to do stuff in a player driven MMO, then maybe you need a more theme-parked MMO that guides you along paths for quests/storyline/raids, etc like World of Warcraft; a themepark where all the rides are already made for you and you just ride the rides as much as you like.
Death is meant to have consequence so that griefers don’t just ram people for the lols
May be its time to stop the new concept ships and finish the back log first as if we only get 1 cap ship a year the Galaxy = 2025 Perseus =2026 , Arrastra =2027, kraken ???
Bla Bla Bla.Does anyone really believe a word that CIG and the CZcams creator knights say anymore..Its old..More cinema type adverts in the background as we are told about pie in the sky daydreams about what might be someday far in the future.