it is difficult to calculate weakness in positional chess, you can only take advantage.AK is very good at critical exchange points, positional attacks carry over vulnerabilities, if used with tempo, you cant survive.you can't win some games? would be interesting to float that one.
@Bossu better means another level.. she is below him on all aspects.. she beat him once doesn't mean she is on the same level.. lol She is 300mmr below him anw 😅
Highly! favourable positional attack by black and very impressive performance by King Magnus against the Rapid Chess Queen Alexandria..Thanks very much for uploading this game..
Imagine at what level magnus is... When the former women's World champion was just bulldozed by him ... Imagine the pressure she faces while playing him
She's 2530. The last time Magnus was 2530, he was 15 years old. This is just a very strong chess player who should simply be considered a middle-level GM... against a Super GM. The Super GMs eat other GMs for breakfast. That this person happens to have won an Affirmative Action title means nothing in chess. This is the world's #606 playing against the world's #1. Her odds going into this were about 1/15 chance of draw, 1/75 chance of win. I think it's cool that she decided to play in this tournament even though she knew what would likely happen.
Well it's an opportunity to play against the best players. You can never count out someone just because their rank is lower than...That's the stupidest thing ever.
@Yugi Saisri she is a champion. This is not affirmative action. No different than inviting Eric Hansen (2606) and Daniel Naroditsky (2616) to tournaments last year and this year. Are they champions or result of affirmative action?
@Yugi Saisri you might think I'm a doofus but her rating is in the same level as Hansen and Naroditsky. Affirmative Action or not that FIDE rating is earned through several wins
Its a very very long road for women chess players to compete with the likes of magnus. But they are on the right track nonetheless. Everything takes time
@@dreamdiction for physical sport - agree, but in terms of mental capacity, there is no difference. There are theories that the bell curve for women is taller and narrower while the man tends to be shorter and wider which suggest women dominate the average IQ while men dominate both - the extreme r3t4rds and the extreme genius ends but that's being debated.
@@miusukamadoto6805 I know about the comparison between men's bell curve and women's bell curve BUT I have very strong doubts that those IQ statistics are actualy true. I have been an IT professional for over 30 years, I have personally worked with MANY female IT Managers and not one of them could code, they simply made their whole IT career out of emotionally manipulating men into doing things for them. I see the same thing happening in chess. Kosteniuk is only a "2530" if you accept the cherry-picking of games by the assessors who exaggerate her chess grading so as to force lower level players into the "GM" category for political/social reason which have nothing to do with chess ability. So theoretically she's a number 606 but this is absurdly generous because she's actually not much more than a good club player. Women are nothing in men's chess just as the Williams sisters are nothing in men's tennis. She's a "woman rapid chess champion" but a real chess player competes with all other chess players. If women can only compete against other women then being a woman is a type of disability, like the para-Olympics. I believe all male/female categories in all mental and physical activities should be abolished. Men must stop pandering to women's contradictory demands for both "equality" and privileged "special treatment" as if they are children. If women cannot compete on equal terms with men in all physical and mental tasks then women do not deserve any recognition or rewards.
@@brehh1337 Yeah...like that "free rook" line. Like, dude, it's blatantly covered, that's why Magnus didn't do the move you thought he should have. He's leisurely walking for a win, he knew he'd won it about 6 moves in.
What’s ChatGPT says about her. It says she the most exciting playing style and aggressive and speculative play behind Judith Polgar. Alexandra Kosteniuk, the 12th Women’s World Chess Champion, is known for her sharp and aggressive play. She has a reputation for her willingness to take risks and her ability to create complications on the board. Kosteniuk’s games often feature speculative sacrifices and creative tactical ideas, which have earned her numerous accolades in the chess world.
Exactly. Some serious incel energy in some of these comments lol, its very sad. Some men are just such insecure failsons that seeing a woman succeed at anything makes them very upset.
She was so low on time but she was so close to turning it around with QD8. Black continuing the check pressure will push white to KA2 which gives a turn of respite behind the B2 pawn to execute QG8 checkmate. Even if black responds with KG6, it will still allow QD8 to fork the rook, threaten the right side pawns and regain some tempo and board position.
@Takata Pino "she had literally 0 chances to win" Okay then who are you? do we know you? lmao. just cause someone is playing against the "most rated" person doesn't mean he/she will loose or even more play always worse. it was pretty much noticeable that she was playing really well the two were in such hard thinking too, so props for her. there's not always win, yes she loose it's when you loose that you became a better chess player. you all have to stop keep blindly push someone just cause is your fav. Everyone deserves a chance or respect
Why? They aren't as good as those super grandmasters, sure, but they are most likely better than the average watcher. They might not know exactly what the players think but are still able to explain many things we ordinary folks just don't see. Also, they have access to engines that can show them the best lines.
David Howell is close to Magnus' level. He's drawn a few games with Magnus. David is higher rated than Alexandra Kosteniuk. If he weren't commentating, he could be playing in the tournament.
@@alex2005z I disagree. Getting “bulldozed” means you had a big mistake in your play, which means a lot more to learn from. She’s clearly a fantastic player and has the capacity to analyze her own games and uncover a weakness. If it was you or I playing against Magnus, I’d agree, but she’s much closer to magnus than we are in terms of skill and chess knowledge
@@johnmartin2805 no, getting bulleozed means you made a lot of small mistakes, and its hard to learn when a lot of your moves arent great (with great being the top stockfish move)
@@alex2005z chess is a game of momentum, where one mistake means that if you play perfectly for the rest of the game it doesn’t matter because the advantage is too high if they dont also make a mistake. She didn’t make “a lot of little mistakes” she made a few that ended up costing her the game
@@velzun8075Yes...a very prudential reason..i agree..Y chromosomes are very powerful..only if the yielder can handle it im just joking..women are just as great
No, because another check would force the king from f1 to e2 when the queen does another check on h1. And since the e4 rook pins the bishop with king on e2, the rook becomes free to take for the queen as the bishop can't move.
Why so much people trolling this female gm? Those who making fun of her They themselves can't play against her,, and even some people are not even higher than 1500elo
who tf cares about how good the people making fun are? They're not saying they can beat her themselves. They're saying that against the top GMs, she doesn't stand a chance, which is true
The morale of this game : Women should get married, stay at home, raise children, prepare the dishes, do the laundry, and , why not , go shopping from time to time with the other housewives.
Magnus is one bishop up and Alexandra has 3 isolated pawns that will easily fall. Magnus kingside pawns can easily become queens... No point playing further even if there's no clear checkmate on the board.
ya I played it as far as her moving the king all the way to the left, either far left or one up and that would be the last check...that's also assuming she takes rook with pawn. I'm not big on chess end game with taking pawns and positions as I'm too much of a newb to understand that but I'd play that out. Looks like Magnus can take some pawns for sure, but then I dunno...I guess she knwos it would be easy for him to queen a pawn then game over.
Well Magnus just thinks differently than anyone else there. But youre right in my opinion David Howell was the only one contributing to the game with his commentary, even though he doesn‘t see the same lines Magnus sees
Why does this chess broadcast feel the need to play gameshow music and play little tones for each move? This seems rather silly for a chess game. This is not Wheel of Fortune, this is Chess.
Crazy to look at these two players foreheads and think about the insane sort of computer that sits inside those skulls. Human brains are incredible and these two particular ones are spectacular examples of what they're capable of. Yea yea chess computers yadda yadda. They can only do one thing, never met a depressed chess computer.
Pretending is Magnus himself who uploads and titles the video in first person is a cheap clickbait. With "my game..." I expected himself explaining the moves...
hä hä the commentator was wrong in any of his predictions and had totally no clue. Alltough he was so brave and happy with every new prediction had hoped to get right at least one time. he looked like a gambler in a casino which doubles down after every loosing game because he allready lost everything he has and if he would stand up from the board, he would have to jump from a bridge, so he can only try to win back everything. But the way.. isnt that the plot of "the gambler" movie.. no, the difference is, "the gambler" actually "won" the last game xd
@@DanLyndon The white rooks on the C file are indeed linked at the position 8:00, if the rook on C1 is taken by the queen, the rook on C8 can take Queen without the white king moving into check. The white bishop doesn't need to move.
@@DanLyndon See. this is what happens when we don't clarify what position we're referring to when specifying the possible line of moves. It's easy to see why Magnus prefers the more aggressive, less attrition/material focused line, but yes, it's not to say that a stronger opponent given a slower format wouldn't have made a different sequence better.
@@DanLyndon There was nothing arbitrary about what I said. The OP said "at the end", which suggests last few moves, it's ambiguous which position they meant. Chill.
I enjoy playing chess, but I'm at a very low level. I'm curious as to how chess commentators operate when they're supposed to tell us how, what and why the player does what they do, when they're commentating on Magnus' play, they seem as clueless as we do until they suddenly catches up with Magnus' brilliant play.
@@IconoclastX So what because you are different you need your own league? If you are not dumber just play chess all together. By this logic white people should have their own 100m run race, because africans are just different and have much more explosive power.
@@anmu9038 No, ALL women are significantly less logical and less physically strong than almost ALL men. It's a universal rule that applies to ALL races of people. It wouldn't make sense to separate africans because not ALL african runners are in the top levels(. There are more mixed race men in these sports than their are women in men's sports; like track. This is because the purpose of woman is not to make woke people feel better about themselves in the year 2022. Their purpose has always been to serve God and raise children. They literally have organs dedicated to feeding babies.
Why the board is smaller and the player's faces are occupying the center of the video? can't see sh1t.. Board should be the primary thing in a chess game, no player faces IMO.
I find the commentors are too hung up on Magnus's ball sack. Yes he's the best player in the world, arguably all time, but his opponents are very capable and have good moments. From hearing the commentators speak, Magnus always has his opponent cornered after e4 e5. It'd be nice if they bring up good moves made by opponents and didn't write them off at the outset all the time. It even cheapens Magnus' victories as it makes it come across as if he won merely because his opponents are tourists instead of him being superior to incredibly strong adversaries.
You can subscribe to Magnus Carlsen CZcams Channel to see more Magnus content :)
Chess is easy though.
i have a question plz . can i play french defense and up rate to 2000- 2400 ?
you're very handsome!
Magnus you should give her name un the tittle. It os a matter of respect
@@ryangramb2294 sure bro, sure bro
Alexandra and Magnus, thank you for the game)
You are both great players
Magnus greater tho :)
it is difficult to calculate weakness in positional chess, you can only take advantage.AK is very good at critical exchange points, positional attacks carry over vulnerabilities, if used with tempo, you cant survive.you can't win some games? would be interesting to float that one.
@@caretime3878 but you are noob btw
Equal strenght between men and women, physically and mentally, obvious female logic.
Game between champions and they use potato for webcam
Relax, you don't need next gen graphics for chess game. 😃
@@art-of2tm yea but they can afford casters but not a 4k webcam
First time chips are used to make patatoes then. That's why those guys are champs
Who cares just watch the game
Not even a whole potato….. just a couple of micro chips 🍟
Not saying she is weak.. she is a world champion.. but the Mag is on another level..
@Bossu better means another level.. she is below him on all aspects.. she beat him once doesn't mean she is on the same level.. lol
She is 300mmr below him anw 😅
@@bossu4076 200 elo ccomment
I seen this game before nd come to see it again because I love how you playing
I think a couple grammar videos may be more beneficial to your future.
I love how computer eval is dead even as Magnus is rolling his pawns forward.
Highly! favourable positional attack by black and very impressive performance by King Magnus against the Rapid Chess Queen Alexandria..Thanks very much for uploading this game..
Imagine at what level magnus is...
When the former women's World champion was just bulldozed by him ...
Imagine the pressure she faces while playing him
The pressure he faces you mean?
@@Bvttgx when you go up against Mike Tyson in a boxing ring...what's your inner feeling ? That's "pressure"
Probably should include her name in the title too
Eg
She's 2530. The last time Magnus was 2530, he was 15 years old. This is just a very strong chess player who should simply be considered a middle-level GM... against a Super GM. The Super GMs eat other GMs for breakfast. That this person happens to have won an Affirmative Action title means nothing in chess. This is the world's #606 playing against the world's #1. Her odds going into this were about 1/15 chance of draw, 1/75 chance of win. I think it's cool that she decided to play in this tournament even though she knew what would likely happen.
Well it's an opportunity to play against the best players. You can never count out someone just because their rank is lower than...That's the stupidest thing ever.
lol
@Yugi Saisri she is a champion. This is not affirmative action. No different than inviting Eric Hansen (2606) and Daniel Naroditsky (2616) to tournaments last year and this year. Are they champions or result of affirmative action?
@@okcameronfilms atleast they are winning games and scoring points
@Yugi Saisri you might think I'm a doofus but her rating is in the same level as Hansen and Naroditsky. Affirmative Action or not that FIDE rating is earned through several wins
God poor Kosteniuk! She is extremely strong but really she just got bulldozed!
She was doing very well until move 17 IMO.
Its a very very long road for women chess players to compete with the likes of magnus. But they are on the right track nonetheless. Everything takes time
@@mecazor Time won't make any difference, women cannot compete equally with men in any mental competition or in any physical sport.
@@dreamdiction for physical sport - agree, but in terms of mental capacity, there is no difference. There are theories that the bell curve for women is taller and narrower while the man tends to be shorter and wider which suggest women dominate the average IQ while men dominate both - the extreme r3t4rds and the extreme genius ends but that's being debated.
@@miusukamadoto6805 I know about the comparison between men's bell curve and women's bell curve BUT I have very strong doubts that those IQ statistics are actualy true. I have been an IT professional for over 30 years, I have personally worked with MANY female IT Managers and not one of them could code, they simply made their whole IT career out of emotionally manipulating men into doing things for them.
I see the same thing happening in chess. Kosteniuk is only a "2530" if you accept the cherry-picking of games by the assessors who exaggerate her chess grading so as to force lower level players into the "GM" category for political/social reason which have nothing to do with chess ability. So theoretically she's a number 606 but this is absurdly generous because she's actually not much more than a good club player. Women are nothing in men's chess just as the Williams sisters are nothing in men's tennis.
She's a "woman rapid chess champion" but a real chess player competes with all other chess players. If women can only compete against other women then being a woman is a type of disability, like the para-Olympics.
I believe all male/female categories in all mental and physical activities should be abolished. Men must stop pandering to women's contradictory demands for both "equality" and privileged "special treatment" as if they are children. If women cannot compete on equal terms with men in all physical and mental tasks then women do not deserve any recognition or rewards.
The commentators simply cannot figure out what Magnus is doing
hahaha yes, the commentators simply talk talk talk to try and make themselves sound relevant.
@@dreamdiction I like commentators like leko or svidler, they give a really fast deep inside to a current game.
@@dreamdiction the dude with glasses is calling good plays, its just that magnus is too smart lol
@@brehh1337 Yeah...like that "free rook" line. Like, dude, it's blatantly covered, that's why Magnus didn't do the move you thought he should have. He's leisurely walking for a win, he knew he'd won it about 6 moves in.
Howell is a great chess player. He knows what's going on lol
Man shows no mercy
looks like a walk in the park for Magnus haha
Incredible game champ!!
What’s ChatGPT says about her. It says she the most exciting playing style and aggressive and speculative play behind Judith Polgar. Alexandra Kosteniuk, the 12th Women’s World Chess Champion, is known for her sharp and aggressive play. She has a reputation for her willingness to take risks and her ability to create complications on the board. Kosteniuk’s games often feature speculative sacrifices and creative tactical ideas, which have earned her numerous accolades in the chess world.
the bet all the smart men shaming women in this comment section have never got over 700 rating
Anybody who has the guts, man or woman, to play a rapid time control game against Super GMs deserves some respect. And I'm 1800 not 700.
Exactly. Some serious incel energy in some of these comments lol, its very sad. Some men are just such insecure failsons that seeing a woman succeed at anything makes them very upset.
@Watch: "Europa: the last battle" | For our sake. It was a learning experience
She was so low on time but she was so close to turning it around with QD8. Black continuing the check pressure will push white to KA2 which gives a turn of respite behind the B2 pawn to execute QG8 checkmate. Even if black responds with KG6, it will still allow QD8 to fork the rook, threaten the right side pawns and regain some tempo and board position.
@Takata Pino yeah she might not have been able to execute, but the chance was there unless you can see something wrong with that liine of play
@Takata Pino "she had literally 0 chances to win" Okay then who are you? do we know you? lmao. just cause someone is playing against the "most rated" person doesn't mean he/she will loose or even more play always worse. it was pretty much noticeable that she was playing really well the two were in such hard thinking too, so props for her.
there's not always win, yes she loose it's when you loose that you became a better chess player.
you all have to stop keep blindly push someone just cause is your fav.
Everyone deserves a chance or respect
@@blackpinkinyourareaaa7846 loosing makes you a better player,she must be so "good" since she loses all the time🥰
"My Game Against a Woman"
-Magnus Carlsen
Women world champion. He said.
@@Its_ur_amy ohhhh! I must have missread that completely
That's what I thought at first lol
Feel like chess is one of the only sports where commentators should never explain what the players which are 10 times batter than them are thinking.
and there should just be no commentators... just a quiet game of chess with 2 players staring at their monitors.
Some of them are grandmasters
Why? They aren't as good as those super grandmasters, sure, but they are most likely better than the average watcher. They might not know exactly what the players think but are still able to explain many things we ordinary folks just don't see. Also, they have access to engines that can show them the best lines.
David Howell is close to Magnus' level. He's drawn a few games with Magnus. David is higher rated than Alexandra Kosteniuk. If he weren't commentating, he could be playing in the tournament.
Wrong. Those guys are usually still either gms or ims and they also use engines to make commentary
Poor chessqueen being used as a punching bag in this event.
She can learn a lot
@@marcind6232 you dont usually learn from getting used as a punching bag. You learn much more from a close game
@@alex2005z I disagree. Getting “bulldozed” means you had a big mistake in your play, which means a lot more to learn from. She’s clearly a fantastic player and has the capacity to analyze her own games and uncover a weakness. If it was you or I playing against Magnus, I’d agree, but she’s much closer to magnus than we are in terms of skill and chess knowledge
@@johnmartin2805 no, getting bulleozed means you made a lot of small mistakes, and its hard to learn when a lot of your moves arent great (with great being the top stockfish move)
@@alex2005z chess is a game of momentum, where one mistake means that if you play perfectly for the rest of the game it doesn’t matter because the advantage is too high if they dont also make a mistake. She didn’t make “a lot of little mistakes” she made a few that ended up costing her the game
muted the video, suddenly it was much better to watch
The pay gap explain in 8 minutes
The GOAT against a GM. What'd people think was going to happen?😂😂😂
Good, Bobby would be proud. The man's right about everything he's said
i just watched that video haha
You are the best, respect bro love you
No surprises here. Great effort from the former champ.
This video was excellent with the volume muted.
Rank 700 Vs Rank 1 in mens what a lucky person to play with the best
Magnus the Great 👍🏿💯👏🏿👏🏿
She was completely destroyed
I bet during the entire match magnus was thinking about what he was gonna have for dinner. It's just that easy for him :)
I mean...his opponent was female.
@@velzun8075 so what?
@@velzun8075 don't feed the troll
@@velzun8075Yes...a very prudential reason..i agree..Y chromosomes are very powerful..only if the yielder can handle it
im just joking..women are just as great
@@velzun8075 ??? so what lmao
He gave her a free lesson
At around 7:45 the commentator says that there's a free rook on the 1st row but the e3 bishop is guarding it.
No, because another check would force the king from f1 to e2 when the queen does another check on h1. And since the e4 rook pins the bishop with king on e2, the rook becomes free to take for the queen as the bishop can't move.
Magnus just annihilated her!! Sheesh!!
Who is the commentator in the middle?
Magnus is that one gentle demon who will offer you trades and once you accept it he'll gobble you up in endgame
Alexandra who?
As always 👍
Classy performance.
I always find it strange how the just runaway after a game with Magnus. He deserves a thank you for his time.
Women think they can compete-MAGNUS shows them they cannot.
Rage quit.
@@niagra898 with anyone against magnus at least.
I would be honored to get the chance to play him win or losse, even if I was a grandmaster.
@@niagra898 they don't understand sportsmanship.
@@niagra898 Is this even a serious comment?
@@deceiver157 Yes. I find it amusing women in chess.
Magnus get well soon. Hope covid-19 is not impacting your performance.
Sars-cov-2 is not contagion. A matter of fact. All viruses are not contagion
You should invite Ivanka to one of your stream session. She would be great benefit
who is the guy in red and black? He was also one day at world championship Dubai, and he was really entertaining to watch
Why so much people trolling this female gm? Those who making fun of her They themselves can't play against her,, and even some people are not even higher than 1500elo
who tf cares about how good the people making fun are? They're not saying they can beat her themselves. They're saying that against the top GMs, she doesn't stand a chance, which is true
@Yugi Saisri she’s the womens world rapid champion I think that qualifies her
@Watch: "Europa: the last battle" | For our sake. She is not a super gm so its obvious
The morale of this game :
Women should get married, stay at home, raise children, prepare the dishes,
do the laundry, and , why not , go shopping from time to time with the other housewives.
Amen brother! We as men have to be strong to make it a reality though!
Magnus stopping crushing people dreams lol hahaha
This was a National Geographic documentary. Lion hunts and kills a baby giraffe. Brutal!!
8:30 after rook eats bishop at e3, Alexandra resigned. But how would you checkmate otherwise ?
Magnus is one bishop up and Alexandra has 3 isolated pawns that will easily fall. Magnus kingside pawns can easily become queens... No point playing further even if there's no clear checkmate on the board.
Why drag out the inevitable? Chessqueen is dead lost so she resigned.
Because magnus is piece up in an endgame when she has isolated pawns.... Any super gm would resign
ya I played it as far as her moving the king all the way to the left, either far left or one up and that would be the last check...that's also assuming she takes rook with pawn. I'm not big on chess end game with taking pawns and positions as I'm too much of a newb to understand that but I'd play that out. Looks like Magnus can take some pawns for sure, but then I dunno...I guess she knwos it would be easy for him to queen a pawn then game over.
@@hulivar magnus is arguably the best endgame player of all time... So don't really need to test it
poor Alexandra, she has been the whipping girl of this tournament. I thought she was at least as strong as Hansen. Not great for her.\
She won against Eric didn’t she?
@@animefan7424 look at the score she got compared to Hansen
@@ProudOne why not just say it dude
i feel so bad for her hope she is ok
simp
Ne4 followed by a4 don't even visually look like moves that make any progress here.
Jeez....why do you need 4 commentators for a match? 1 would do quite nicely - leaving aside they were clueless about Magnus's moves.
Well Magnus just thinks differently than anyone else there. But youre right in my opinion David Howell was the only one contributing to the game with his commentary, even though he doesn‘t see the same lines Magnus sees
When will see again a women through the top 10 again?
Never!
If Magnus gets a secs change.
@@erlindaalba1682 He's born as a male, even with a total change, he always will be a male
@@XxKidnoffxX based
@@Petertuske what 'based' mean??
You won't find this game in chess queen channel.
Maybe her name in the title ??
Som en boss
Why does this chess broadcast feel the need to play gameshow music and play little tones for each move? This seems rather silly for a chess game. This is not Wheel of Fortune, this is Chess.
J’adore la Finlande et les finlandais. Dommage que tu ne lises pas les commentaires.
You're the best, bro, and I adore you.
Blocked.
Bot
hahaha the "chess queen" cannot even compare to the top ten thousand male chess players.
@@dreamdiction Why do you hate women so much?
Why the announcers have to talk during every single moment my god! Just let the game play a little
That commentator definitely has to learn to let the others talk.
There's a separate female category in competitive chess?
Got caught slipping in the opening prep
Crazy to look at these two players foreheads and think about the insane sort of computer that sits inside those skulls. Human brains are incredible and these two particular ones are spectacular examples of what they're capable of.
Yea yea chess computers yadda yadda. They can only do one thing, never met a depressed chess computer.
Why is there a womens world championship??
Did you watch the video ? It speaks for itself.
My favourite chess duo is Le Dude.
why play Magnus at the first place..
Pretending is Magnus himself who uploads and titles the video in first person is a cheap clickbait. With "my game..." I expected himself explaining the moves...
It is Magnus's verified account. He owns Chess24, who provided the stream and commentary, hence why he's uploaded their coverage to his account.
@@leemarshal3329 That's OK but I dont think Magnus is behind this video but his marketing and media staff
8:40
Magnus on the outside: : /
Magnus on the inside: ;) ; D
hä hä the commentator was wrong in any of his predictions and had totally no clue. Alltough he was so brave and happy with every new prediction had hoped to get right at least one time. he looked like a gambler in a casino which doubles down after every loosing game because he allready lost everything he has and if he would stand up from the board, he would have to jump from a bridge, so he can only try to win back everything. But the way.. isnt that the plot of "the gambler" movie.. no, the difference is, "the gambler" actually "won" the last game xd
Yeah, ok.
That chess queen is a machine
a broken machine.
@@dreamdiction with a higher rating than you
@@KPcpt she mostly competes against other females locked away from the men, if there was no male/female barrier her ranking would be far lower lol.
@@LokiOdinssnn That is true across all competition, but she'd definitely destroy youtube comment section players.
@@LokiOdinssnnit’s clear you don’t watch her streams lmao. She beats men ALL the time, and high rated men too.
Alexandra is amazing!
She should try playing women's golf, maybe she will have a chance.
@@dreamdiction why would you say that, cus she's bad or cus she's A woman?!
@@user-oh8ou2ik2u She's way out of her league.
everything designed so that viewers do not and cannot think.
At 1:48 why doesn't white simply win a piece with NF5? Knocks the queen away from defending the bishop while attacking the bishop.
Bxf5
@@anmax Wow lol don't know how I missed that thanks.
@@jrrd4069 just kidding 😂😂
Bxf5 bruh blunder master 😂
Who are the commentators?
So the two main one are David Howell & Jovanka Houska, then there is Kaja Snare, but who is the dude with a Russian accent?
When Magnus checked with the Queen at the end, why no just capture whites rook since the bishop was pinned and couldn’t recapture?
The white rooks are linked, look again.
I’m obviously as dumb as the commentator😂 thanks for pointing that out!
@@DanLyndon The white rooks on the C file are indeed linked at the position 8:00, if the rook on C1 is taken by the queen, the rook on C8 can take Queen without the white king moving into check. The white bishop doesn't need to move.
@@DanLyndon See. this is what happens when we don't clarify what position we're referring to when specifying the possible line of moves. It's easy to see why Magnus prefers the more aggressive, less attrition/material focused line, but yes, it's not to say that a stronger opponent given a slower format wouldn't have made a different sequence better.
@@DanLyndon There was nothing arbitrary about what I said. The OP said "at the end", which suggests last few moves, it's ambiguous which position they meant. Chill.
Yeah let's look at their faces, because that's what's important than chess. Right??
I enjoy playing chess, but I'm at a very low level. I'm curious as to how chess commentators operate when they're supposed to tell us how, what and why the player does what they do, when they're commentating on Magnus' play, they seem as clueless as we do until they suddenly catches up with Magnus' brilliant play.
They have an engine.
Why didn't she take that rook with her pawn in the end?
Everytime I watch a match with david commenting, i think i understand chess. But when I play ugh 🤮🤮
Feel bad for Alexandra. Her title might be stripped off because she's Russian.
Magnus blundered before his main attack.
She's out of her league playing in this tournament LOL, she's lost every game thus far, the only player to do so.
@Oswald Cobblepot so what, every blind squirrel will eventually find a nut. She couldn't even force 1 draw
The commentators make this unwatchable, need to just mute it.
Easy win for magnus...
It's weird if you're imagining they could have sit there without a pc or whatever.. just sitting there..
Lmao there is even woman and man chess??? I get it why men and women don’t run 100m together but what advantage have men in chess?
more logical cognitive function. Women aren't dumber they are just different
@@IconoclastX So what because you are different you need your own league? If you are not dumber just play chess all together. By this logic white people should have their own 100m run race, because africans are just different and have much more explosive power.
@@anmu9038 No, ALL women are significantly less logical and less physically strong than almost ALL men. It's a universal rule that applies to ALL races of people. It wouldn't make sense to separate africans because not ALL african runners are in the top levels(. There are more mixed race men in these sports than their are women in men's sports; like track. This is because the purpose of woman is not to make woke people feel better about themselves in the year 2022. Their purpose has always been to serve God and raise children. They literally have organs dedicated to feeding babies.
Why the board is smaller and the player's faces are occupying the center of the video? can't see sh1t.. Board should be the primary thing in a chess game, no player faces IMO.
She has no clue on what she was doing. Sorry.
Pawn takes rook no?
this game what we called "THE MASSACRE"
Put her name on the video title shall we?
This is why women should not be in Gov
your game 'against woman'?
Her name is Alexandra Konsteniuk.
Who writes the titles for these?
I really don't like that commentator he keeps predicting wrong and bad moves non of them actually got played!!
??? He can't play the bishop BECAUSE THE BISHOP IS PINNED BY THE ROOK DUMBASS
Maknyus ... Maknyus ... you again ... 😂
Magnus OP
I find the commentors are too hung up on Magnus's ball sack. Yes he's the best player in the world, arguably all time, but his opponents are very capable and have good moments. From hearing the commentators speak, Magnus always has his opponent cornered after e4 e5. It'd be nice if they bring up good moves made by opponents and didn't write them off at the outset all the time. It even cheapens Magnus' victories as it makes it come across as if he won merely because his opponents are tourists instead of him being superior to incredibly strong adversaries.
Some of this commetator analysis is not very accurate.