595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President? | Freakonomics Radio
Vložit
- čas přidán 4. 07. 2024
- American politics is trapped in a duopoly, with two all-powerful parties colluding to stifle competition. We revisit a 2018 episode to explain how the political industry works, and talk to a reformer (and former presidential candidate) who is pushing for change.
ABOUT FREAKONOMICS RADIO:
Discover the hidden side of everything with host Stephen J. Dubner, co-author of the Freakonomics books. Each week, Dubner speaks with Nobel laureates and provocateurs, intellectuals and entrepreneurs, and various other underachievers to uncover things you always thought you knew (but didn’t) and things you never thought you wanted to know (but do) - from the economics of sleep to the future of education, from markets for marriage to the surprising utility of wolves.
SUBSCRIBE TO FREAKONOMICS RADIO:
CZcams: freak.ws/3yIl6dl
Stitcher: freak.ws/3gbLru9
Apple Podcasts: freak.ws/3SWjW6d
Spotify: freak.ws/3TsdCmV
ABOUT FREAKONOMICS RADIO NETWORK:
Freakonomics began as a book, which led to a blog, a documentary film, more books, a pair of pants, and in 2010, a podcast called Freakonomics Radio. Hosted by Stephen J. Dubner, it’s one of the most popular podcasts in the world, with a reputation for storytelling that is both rigorous and entertaining. Its archive of more than 500 episodes is available, for free, on any podcast app, and the show airs weekly on NPR stations. Freakonomics Radio is now the flagship show of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which includes the podcasts No Stupid Questions (est. 2020), People I (Mostly) Admire (2020), and Freakonomics, M.D. (2021).
FREAKONOMICS RADIO NETWORK PODCASTS:
Freakonomics Radio: freakonomics.com/series/freak...
No Stupid Questions: freakonomics.com/series/nsq/
People I (Mostly) Admire: freakonomics.com/series/peopl...
Freakonomics, M.D.: freakonomics.com/series/bapu/
Special series: freakonomics.com/topics/
CONNECT WITH US:
/ freakonomics
/ freakonomics
freakonomics.com/podcasts/
Subscribe to our newsletter: freak.ws/3CzOVhw
Email us: radio@freakonomics.com
This is an enlightening broadcast about a vitally important topic. I'm looking forward to hearing more about these movements.
This is a well put together argument for something so many people instinctually know.
This episode is 🔥
We do. They just get blocked out by the party’s anointed ones. For better or for worse.
The two failures of democracy…a n uninformed/poorly informed voting public, and a dearth of qualified candidates. You’re my fave podcast.
It's fair to question Yang's optimism on voting reform, given his track record of losing races and endorsements. However, the fact that there are other organizations pushing for Porter and Gehl's ideas mean it's not largely dependent on Yang to progress. Institute for Political Innovation, Unite America, and Veterans for All Voters are doing a good job organizing and spreading the solution of Final Five Voting.
Because you get the politics you deserve.
We don’t really know who we are voting for because we don’t know which oligarchs pull the strings of candidates!
I'd just like to say that getting Big Money out of politics is a vital step, in addition to the reforms discussed here. So long as Elon Musk can donate $250 million to the RNC (or other multi-billionaires to give million$$$ to the RNC), these corrupt private clubs will be hard to stop. If the states were to start adopting tough donation laws and tough truth-in-advertising laws for campaigns, it would accelerate the rise of third parties.
We need strict limits on donation amounts & a cap on total spending per constituent. Plus laws requiring that political advertisements disclose the names of the individuals and organizations who paid for them.
If l were the reform czar, campaigns would be publicly funded with strict spending limits, and it would be a felony for any office holder or candidate to accept private donations.
Dr.Pepprr just started to outsell Pepsi
An interesting read would be the defense arguments and Court conclusions in Wilding et al vs DNC Services Corporation.
The DNC admits it has the right to rig primaries and select their candidates privately. The promise in their charter for even handedness isn’t legally binding.
I, as a voter, am neither a Blood nor a Crip. Why do I have to vote for either of them?
I would love to hear realistic approaches to drawing districts in a non partisan way. Democrats in New Mexico made sure SE NM has no voice. On the other hand, we are so sparse that i recognize drawing districts fairly is tough.
One possibility might be electing candidates statewide through ranked-choice voting. Get rid of districts altogether. It would also give third-party candidates a better chance of getting more that 1% of the vote.
For much of the blame we need to look to our professional laptop class and our MSM rendering the precious Fourth Estate a darn ghetto.
God bless Alaska
Fuck this system, might be the first election I vote third party
because we confuse free money with free speech. If it were free speech we'd have more choices.
I love Coke 😄
Ranked choice voting only completely disenfranchises half the population and gives a lot of people their secondary or third choice representative. Open primaries are essentially two round voting, which when fully implemented like in France leads to strategic voting where people don't so much select their representative but have a stronger veto against who they don't want to run government. I'm dubious that democracy with an unlimited franchise ends up making good laws. But if you want to implement it, why not allow people to give proxies to who they want to represent them? So my candidate gets 1207 votes out of 45,000,000 votes cast. That's how much his vote counts. And why am I stuck with a candidate who happens to live near me?
Representative democracy is 18th century technology. In a democracy, it is taken as a given that the best way to govern the nation is in accordance to the popular will. How do we determine the popular will? Now, back in the day Joe Farmer couldn't realistically couldn't cruise on out to DC every week to weigh in on the issues of the day, so it made sense to send someone out to lobby for corn subsidies. These days most of us, especially teenagers, carry the internet in our pocket. Do we want to know the popular will over an interstate highway extension in Kansas? Well we can ask the elected representives, yes, and they will perhaps in turn ask the voters, or more probably the important deciders: the donors. Or we could just ask the people themselves. Which is more likely to give us a good reading of the popular will?
Yeah. Why would I want someone that lives on my block representing my block? Someone who has to live in my community representing the interests of my community?
@@4terrascorned Why vote for a national government based on geographical constituencies? I have more in common folks I follow on CZcams then with the folks around here. Why worry about representing the geographical community and not the professional or political community? It made sense back before we have computers, but not now.
@@richdobbs6595 you would really like what Mousollini did in Italy. I mean, it worked great until it didn't. There's also francos Spain and Pinochets Chili.
@@4terrascorned That seems like a non sequitur to me. Maybe you should fill in you reasoning a bit. I'm more closer to AnCap then I am to fascism in outlook.
Exactly nine years after the cultural thing happened and that's true with almost every there exceptions, but with almost everything it happens in politics it happens nine or ten years after the culture shifts.
Seth Godin
czcams.com/video/he1Vji1n8z0/video.htmlsi=rcUlUwCT7h_dg9pw&t=168