Pythagorean Theorem Proof (Geometry)

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 19. 09. 2014
  • The Pythagorean Theorem says that for any right triangle, a^2+b^2=c^2. In this video we prove that this is true. There are many different proofs, but we chose one that gives a delightful visual explanation for why the Pythagorean Theorem works.
    To learn more Geometry, you can watch our playlist from the beginning:
    bit.ly/GeometrySocratica
    You might also like our videos about How to Be a Great Student!
    bit.ly/StudyTipsPlaylist
    ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
    Ways to support our channel:
    ► Join our Patreon : / socratica
    ► Make a one-time PayPal donation: www.paypal.me/socratica
    ► We also accept Bitcoin @ 1EttYyGwJmpy9bLY2UcmEqMJuBfaZ1HdG9
    Thank you!
    ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
    Connect with us!
    Facebook: / socraticastudios
    Instagram: / socraticastudios
    Twitter: / socratica
    ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦
    Geometer: Louise McCartney
    Artwork: Kelly Vivanco
    Written by Michael Harrison
    Directed & Produced by Kimberly Hatch Harrison & Michael Harrison
    ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦

Komentáře • 224

  • @thetruthfulchannel6348
    @thetruthfulchannel6348 Před 8 lety +228

    People should be taught this in school instead of just being given the formula and told to memorize it.

    • @felipesdam
      @felipesdam Před 8 lety +9

      I agree... it's truth

    • @DlcEnergy
      @DlcEnergy Před 7 lety +12

      damn right... i feel like maybe the teachers themselves didn't even know, and were told to memorize it when they were in school... :}
      in which they probably had to re-look over for when they became teachers... lol

    • @DlcEnergy
      @DlcEnergy Před 7 lety +3

      i could do so much for the high schoolers if i were a teacher... understanding sine, cosine and tangent is one of these things you don't get explained either...
      you just get told to memorize sohcahtoa, so that you know what inputs to press on the calculator to figure out angles and sides... but do they bollocks have a clue why...
      i only learned once i became a programmer...
      even when i first learned to use them with the rotation algorithm, i didn't understand the logic behind why the rotation works, but i do now...
      it also leads onto dot products of vectors... which can be used to project the length of a vector perpendicular to another... :]
      anyway, they probably feel they'd be wasting their time, since yeah, do they all need to know all this stuff? what if they end up working in gregs? lol

    • @DlcEnergy
      @DlcEnergy Před 7 lety

      ***** yeah, i know... :]
      but algebra wouldn't even seem like anything scary and hard to those wimpy girl kinda students, if say, you were viewing it in the way of programming...
      banana = 8
      therefore, we can split that banana...
      split = banana / 2
      xD
      jk, but it may possibly help... at least make IT fucking useful in school... we all know how to use computers... xD

    • @marioalonsojr120
      @marioalonsojr120 Před 7 lety

      if your mind was curious enough you would have proposed to find the reason and truth yourself rather than blaming your teachers...i don't blame you

  • @lonelywuffy
    @lonelywuffy Před 7 lety +120

    After finishing my Engineering degree, where I use the right angle triangle a million times, I finally found out WHY we can do this haha

    • @JSSTyger
      @JSSTyger Před 6 lety +7

      Yeah I figured out a proof of the quadratic formula as well only after I got my degree. That one used to have me perplexed.

    • @EliA-mm7ul
      @EliA-mm7ul Před 5 lety +5

      @@JSSTyger It is sad! Our education system failing us

    • @nathanglueck2632
      @nathanglueck2632 Před 3 lety +1

      @@EliA-mm7ul I bottomed out of math and science because I cannot remember what I dont understand. Also the mathematical mode of expression is just gibberish to me. I was told often just remember the equation and forget about why. However, I also realized that if I had to understand every equation I used, I would spend my whole life learning and not getting anything done. The 3000 year history of math is too big to be taught meaningfully. Using formulae you dont grasp is just essential for getting the job done. Even tho its not the job for me.

  • @liliacfury
    @liliacfury Před 7 lety +11

    3:24 if you confused by what happened here, (a+b) squared is basically (a+b)(a+b) and if you distribute that, a times a is a squared, + a times b which is ab, + b times b which is b squared, plus b times a which is ba, or ab. So now we have the terms a squared. b squared. ab. and ab. Since were trying to add them all together ab plus ab is just 2 times ab. 2ab. So now its 2ab + b squared + a squared. Or in her case using associative property of addition she moved around the terms. That's how she got that equation.

  • @learnerlearns
    @learnerlearns Před 7 lety +13

    Beautiful presentation of this elegant proof. Thank you!

  • @learnphilosophy8587
    @learnphilosophy8587 Před 6 lety +8

    Aw I love this proof. So simple but the fact you can visualise it is nice

  • @firedancerdk
    @firedancerdk Před 6 lety +8

    Beautifully done! The shortest most elegant and precise proof of the Pythagorean Theorem. I am almost sad that summerhollidays are coming... :D :D

  • @donovanholm
    @donovanholm Před 8 lety +3

    Thank you!!! Keep these videos going!!!

  • @felipesdam
    @felipesdam Před 8 lety +3

    This class, it's so completed. I've learned more about it that has showed the foundation of this theorem. Thanks ...

  • @lakshayyadav2715
    @lakshayyadav2715 Před 4 lety +4

    GOOD EXPLANATION WITH BEAUTIFUL DIAGRAMS ,SPEECH AND EXPRESSIONS
    ...

  • @Coolblueocean2001
    @Coolblueocean2001 Před 7 lety +2

    Really one of the best videos on the topic.

  • @kenlezzy
    @kenlezzy Před 9 lety +2

    Super High Five & Quod Erat Demonstrandum Gorgeous !
    Well done Socratica, Please keep up the awesome work.
    Best Regards,
    Kenneth.

  • @marvhartigan3677
    @marvhartigan3677 Před 5 lety +1

    awesome explanation guys .Keep up the good work

  • @samielhellhound
    @samielhellhound Před 10 lety +4

    Another awesome video, Keep up the great work.

  • @learnphilosophy8587
    @learnphilosophy8587 Před 6 lety +1

    They never showed you these proofs in school but i loved to go look them up and i loved being able to understand for the first time

  • @tombraider77777
    @tombraider77777 Před 5 lety +2

    I've never seen it expressed like this, nice work.

  • @stormplayzop223
    @stormplayzop223 Před rokem +1

    Great video, beautiful explanation. Thanks

  • @darothimukhopadhyay7055
    @darothimukhopadhyay7055 Před 4 lety +1

    Nice video. It really helped me a lot. Thank u so much .

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP Před 3 lety

    Right-on! Unfortunately I find myself at the end of another Socratica playlist; I’ll have to find another to binge-watch!

  • @kankanamukherjee2865
    @kankanamukherjee2865 Před 6 lety +1

    thank you soooo much,I was explaining it to my kid and it was so helpful thanks again

  • @randellporter8747
    @randellporter8747 Před 7 lety +1

    I love her explanation. It's very under understandable.

  • @lucyhendry8276
    @lucyhendry8276 Před 8 lety +20

    Oh my gosh this helped so much! I had math homework that asked me to prove Pythagoras theorem and it made no sense to me at all. I watched other videos but they didn't really help at all! I used this and it totally made it so much easier for me to understand! Thank you!

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +3

      +Lucy Hendry That's wonderful! We're so glad to hear our video helped. Good luck with your math class, and come see us again! :)

    • @WahranRai
      @WahranRai Před 3 lety

      there are at least 300 hundred differtent ways to demonstrate Pythagore Theorem

  • @tahreemullah1469
    @tahreemullah1469 Před 4 lety +1

    Well done. Good Explanation

  • @ashutoshsuman9473
    @ashutoshsuman9473 Před 4 lety +1

    Visual in Combination with theory is Awesome.

  • @strivingtoo7669
    @strivingtoo7669 Před 7 lety +1

    thanks...that is was very helpful

  • @freefreeman6873
    @freefreeman6873 Před 2 lety

    Ur so calm, I love Ur videos.
    😻❤ thank u

  • @learnphilosophy8587
    @learnphilosophy8587 Před 6 lety +4

    It's just as good as Euclid's proof that there are infinitely many primes. Proofs are the best thing in mathematics.

  • @danmichael9629
    @danmichael9629 Před 6 lety

    Good video, best I have seen. Here is an important tip. The Pythagorean Theorem works in 3 dimensional space. So, consider x,y, and z (elevation coordinates). Then x squared + y squared + z squared = length squared... So for example. imagine a squared off room. What is the length from a corner to a spot on the ceiling somewhere in the room? I you know its x,y and z coordinates...use the Pythagorean theorem. I use this in machining, outside measurements, etc.

  • @krish6729
    @krish6729 Před 4 lety

    Elegant! - with the least assumptions and using the very basics of algebra and Geometry.

  • @shreyanshkeshari7550
    @shreyanshkeshari7550 Před 5 lety +2

    Thanks it's very helpful

  • @kruthikapatel2255
    @kruthikapatel2255 Před 7 lety +1

    thank you it helped me a lot

  • @aneeshsingh9292
    @aneeshsingh9292 Před 4 lety +1

    Was really helpful.

  • @peacockfeather7143
    @peacockfeather7143 Před 7 lety +2

    Thank you this helped so much!

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 7 lety

      You are so welcome! Thanks for letting us know! :)

  • @gonzalezgavino
    @gonzalezgavino Před 9 lety +2

    BRAVÍSIMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
    AWESOME!!
    Thanks ever so much.

  • @marksletters
    @marksletters Před 2 lety

    Thank you …. Very well done !!

  • @syamalchattopadhyay2893

    Excellent video lecture

  • @mohammadpourheydarian5877

    Thank you. very simple.

  • @andonrangelov8844
    @andonrangelov8844 Před rokem

    What is a good mathematical journal to present a new proof of the Pythagorean Theorem? I proof it differently and have checked with more than 400 solutions and did not find my solution, so I want to submit it for publication. Can you suggest a journal?

  • @josephwilles29
    @josephwilles29 Před rokem

    Your aesthetics equal your timbre and your articulate way you explain this proof.

  • @muhiuddin91
    @muhiuddin91 Před 9 lety +3

    This is awesome...

  • @arindamkundu7558
    @arindamkundu7558 Před 4 lety

    THANKS IT HELPED ME VERY MUCH

  • @AJ-fo3hp
    @AJ-fo3hp Před 4 lety

    Nice explanation

  • @AminulIslam-mq8in
    @AminulIslam-mq8in Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks for helping me to learn it.

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 3 lety

      We're so glad we could help! Thanks for letting us know - that really motivates us to keep making videos. 💜🦉

  • @chloeliu3316
    @chloeliu3316 Před 8 lety +2

    THIS ACTUALLY MADE SENSE THIS IS AWESOME

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety

      +Chloe Liu That's so great to hear! Thanks for watching! :)

  • @rashikajhan8361
    @rashikajhan8361 Před 4 lety

    Good explanation

  • @Xsjr03
    @Xsjr03 Před 6 lety

    Please answer me if you can:
    Do we know why the circle has 360 degrees and why is 1 degree the foundation of common angle measurements?
    Because in all these gemotric theorums etc. we use these as the base, unless the ancients proved them in some other fashion.

    • @camgere
      @camgere Před 2 lety

      360 = 2*2*2*3*3*5. So it is easily divisible by 2 and 10 and other useful numbers. It always struck me that there are 365 days in a year and 360 degrees in a circle. Close enough for Flint Stone astronomy. In engineering we generally use radians for angle. There are always 2 pi radiuses around a circle (360 degrees) and pi radiuses in 180 degrees and pi/2 radiuses in 90 degrees. A weird number but not at all arbitrary. If the radius is 1, you can just say 2 pi, pi and pi/2 and that is the actual length you travel around the arc associated with that angle. Oh, we actually call them "radians" not "radiuses".

    • @MrBeen992
      @MrBeen992 Před rokem

      360 deg is an arbitrary choice, although not so arbitrary if you think that the Babilonians thought the year had 360 days. I think that the military use 400 deg circle (?)

  • @judgenap
    @judgenap Před 8 lety +1

    Thank you so much.

  • @GGs-c1u
    @GGs-c1u Před 4 lety +1

    Could you do a proof for De Gua's theorem?

  • @Alialsari12
    @Alialsari12 Před rokem

    Brilliant!

  • @amir650
    @amir650 Před 8 lety +3

    Is there a name for this proof? Also, it would be nice if you could explain why the proof fails when the triangle is not a right triangle. Presumably because you cannot form a square when you align them?

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +5

      I don't know of a name for this proof. (There are actually quite a few proofs of the Pythagorean theorem!) You're right, for non-right triangles, this proof doesn't work - you can't make a square. You can, however, generalize the Pythagorean Theorem to work with *any* triangle. This gives you the law of cosines from trigonometry. We'll make a video about this eventually. :)

    • @yogera7776
      @yogera7776 Před 7 lety +2

      Pythogoras theorem is valid for right triangle only

    • @koalabear9769
      @koalabear9769 Před 7 lety +1

      Software Architecture & Design this is called Bhaskara's proof

    • @garderinahomegarden644
      @garderinahomegarden644 Před 6 lety

      Software Architecture & Design

  • @tekharthazenyatta2310
    @tekharthazenyatta2310 Před 5 lety +4

    As The Truthful Channel noted, this proof should be taught in all high school geometry classes. First, it's not difficult to understand once the trick is laid out for you as in this video. Second, a simple proof like this demystifies the theorem and gives the students the feeling they're not expected to be passive robots tasked with memorizing formulas of dubious utility. Third, the proof gives insight into mathematical ingenuity. An instructor can instill the feeling that every single student in the class could have come up with this proof with just a little perseverance and willingness to think. You only need to know a bit of algebra and the area formulas for squares and triangles. Such an approach, which avoids the subtle implication that students are intellectually incapable or too disinterested to understand the origin of famous results, can provide an early trigger to a mathematically talented students who otherwise might never have considered studying the subject seriously.

    • @chasepacker8638
      @chasepacker8638 Před rokem

      And this is exactly one of the reasons I lost interest in math at a young age when I was suited for it...

  • @kilroy987
    @kilroy987 Před rokem

    Nice, thank you.

  • @LAnonHubbard
    @LAnonHubbard Před 6 lety +1

    Beautiful.

  • @Darkduke1000
    @Darkduke1000 Před 8 lety +2

    Great video but how do you multiply out the (a+b)² to get a²+2ab+b² ?

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +3

      +DarkDuke 2015 Thanks for watching! Have you done this kind of multiplication before? Try writing it out like this: (a+b) x (a+b).
      Then be really methodical and careful, and multiply out each part in order: axa = a^2; axb = ab, bxa = ba (or ab, same thing), and bxb = b^2. add it all up and you get a^2 + 2ab + b^2.
      (do you see how when you add ab and ab you get 2ab).
      Be careful with this kind of multiplication if there are any negative signs, because then some of the parts will be negative and you'll have to subtract instead of add. This one had all + signs, so you just had to add all the parts together.
      Hope that helps!

    • @Darkduke1000
      @Darkduke1000 Před 8 lety +1

      Socratica Cool thanks i watched a video the other day about that he called it foil. I do get it. You can also redraw the rectangle of (a+b)² and draw in the lines. a² , b² , and the 2ab fit into it perfectly =)

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +1

      Nice! Yes, "foil" is a good mnemonic for remembering to do all the parts of the multiplication (First, Outer, Inner, Last). Glad to hear it is all working for you! :)

    • @akshaypatil62
      @akshaypatil62 Před 4 lety

      @@Socratica Nice explanation

    • @ok5183
      @ok5183 Před 4 lety

      Did thay not teach you that?

  • @bryantreacher5793
    @bryantreacher5793 Před 3 lety

    This is a much better way of proving Pythagoras,s theorem rather than just saying that a squared plus b squared equals c squared which is not in don't as can easily be shown but that in it self don't prove that the triangle is a right angled but your method makes this clear .

  • @learnwithfun5459
    @learnwithfun5459 Před 4 lety

    Very good

  • @Jediy69
    @Jediy69 Před 5 lety +1

    Now i understand.i now have an assignment.

  • @ibrahimr.khojasteh9919
    @ibrahimr.khojasteh9919 Před 4 měsíci

    Nice... thanks

  • @Bulhakas
    @Bulhakas Před 11 měsíci

    If this had been my Maths teacher, I would have been the best student in my class.

  • @SrlePopovic
    @SrlePopovic Před 8 měsíci

    What a nice teacher

  • @AegidiusREX
    @AegidiusREX Před 3 lety

    Le théorème de Pythagore s’obtient directement à partir d’une propriété du triangle rectangle selon laquelle on engendre deux triangles semblables au triangle d’origine en projetant une droite à partir d’un de ses sommets sur le côté opposé. On montre facilement que le triangle rectangle est le seul à avoir cette caractéristique. L’hypoténuse est alors divisée en deux par cette ligne projetée qui n'est autre que la hauteur partant de l'angle droit. Chaque angle non droit peut alors s’interpréter de deux façons, soit avec l’hypoténuse en entier soit avec une partie seulement, auquel cas c'est l’autre côté qui est cette fois-ci l’hypoténuse du triangle rectangle inscrit. Voilà d’où vient a^2, le côté a est tantôt hypoténuse tantôt non hypoténuse, donc tantôt au numérateur tantôt au dénominateur dans la formulation issue des triangles semblables, les produits en croix donnent a^2. On obtient le même type d'équation avec l’autre angle non droit, l’addition des deux égalités donne le théorème de Pythagore. Bien à vous

  • @The_Green_Man_OAP
    @The_Green_Man_OAP Před 7 měsíci

    Try this:
    0:22 a²+b²=(a+b)²-2ab
    Consider: c²+2ab
    Factoring:
    c²(1+2(a/c)(b/c))=c²(1+2sinAcosA)
    The value 2ab/c² is the double angle
    trig ratio sin2A.
    Consider: (a+b)²/c²
    This is equivalent: (sinA+cosA)²
    Expanding out: sin²A+cos²A+2sinAcosA
    Subs for 2sinAcosA & due to “†” & “‡” (bottom), this is: 1+sin2A.
    From “1”, have: c²+2ab=c²(1+sin2A)
    From “2”, have: (a+b)²/c²=1+sin2A.
    Therefore:
    c²=(c²+2ab)/(1+sin2A)=(c²+2ab)/(a+b)²/c²
    Multiplying by (a+b)²/c² on both sides:
    (a+b)²=c²+2ab => (a+b)²-2ab=a²+b²=c²
    …QED 😊.
    (†)From the compound angle formulas(‡)
    for sin & cos, you get double angle formulas for those, and from cos2A you get:
    1-2sin²A=2cos²A-1=cos2A
    => 2=2(cos²A+sin²A)
    Therefore: 1=(cos²A+sin²A)
    (‡)Proof in this video:
    “Angle sum identities for sine and cosine” by blackpenredpen

  • @GothicDarkhellrazor
    @GothicDarkhellrazor Před 9 lety +2

    Thank you :)

  • @Music--ng8cd
    @Music--ng8cd Před rokem

    It's nice to see a method that uses algebra and not just rearranging shapes.

  • @shahafzm
    @shahafzm Před 2 lety

    thank you :)

  • @TheHuamantla
    @TheHuamantla Před 7 lety +1

    Great!..

  • @EntropyPI
    @EntropyPI Před 10 lety +2

    We'll done!

  • @feandjk2
    @feandjk2 Před 7 lety

    Amazing

  • @SidneySilvaCarnavaleney

    En cuanto al Triángulo rectángulo, donde se aplica el "Teorema de Pitágoras", tengo un nuevo concepto sobre este "Teorema" voy a llamar "Teorema de Sidney Silva" sigue mi relato;
    Condición de Existencia de un Triángulo; para construir un triángulo no podemos utilizar ninguna medida, tiene que seguir la condición de existencia: Para construir un triángulo es necesario que la medida de cualquiera de los lados sea menor que la suma de las medidas de los otros dos y mayor que el valor absoluto de la diferencia entre estas medidas, esto está relacionado en el Teorema de Pitágoras, ya en el "Teorema de Sidney Silva" podemos sí utilizar cualquier medida, siguiendo la condición de existencia; donde puedo construir un Triángulo que la necesidad de la medida de cualquiera de los lados sea mayor que la división de las medidas del lado más pequeño del valor absoluto (fórmula a ^ 2 = b ^ 2: c ^ 2 o b ^ 2: c ^ 2 En el caso de la hipotenusa será menor que los catetos, y siempre los catetos serán mayores que la Hipotenusa, donde los números 5,4,3 ya están obsoletos, cuando cambien de números, será aproximado , redondeado y simplificado, ya por mi "Teorema de Sidney Silva" siempre será exacto con 100% exactos .. !!!!, Sr Sidney Silva.

    • @MrBeen992
      @MrBeen992 Před rokem

      Eso es un corolario del Teorema de Pitagoras, no un Teorema. Buen intento

  • @lol-yo8ho
    @lol-yo8ho Před 7 lety +2

    i love this.

  • @halimayusuf7535
    @halimayusuf7535 Před 6 lety

    Pls ma a full video on Pythagoras rule from the beginning to the end pls a video ma pls reply I need it aloy

  • @thewirelessbrain9331
    @thewirelessbrain9331 Před 8 lety +1

    I've noticed that all of the people your channel feature are beautiful.

  • @KevinAPamwar
    @KevinAPamwar Před měsícem

    To be a bit more creative.... rather then just using areas...
    a^2 + b^2 = c^2
    rearrange
    a^2 = c^2 - b^2 = (c + b)(c- b)
    a*a = (c + b)(c- b)...... intersecting chords
    a/(c- b) = (c + b)/a ....... similar triangles

  • @shadababbas1955
    @shadababbas1955 Před 6 lety

    Thanks

  • @joelmaria9358
    @joelmaria9358 Před 9 lety +3

    Wow m a student nd its helpfull for me

  • @ankurkandpal3056
    @ankurkandpal3056 Před 8 lety +1

    nice 1

  • @kimberlyrobledo3507
    @kimberlyrobledo3507 Před 7 lety

    Does anyone know the name of this proof?

    • @ok5183
      @ok5183 Před 4 lety

      Pythagoras theorem proof there is no name

  • @MrStevenToast
    @MrStevenToast Před 9 lety +1

    This woman is a stunner....

  • @willjohnson4579
    @willjohnson4579 Před 3 lety

    We had to learn this for our exams, I spent about 2 hours last night trying to remember it and all I got was a bunch of ultimately useless truths about a right triangle by using sin cos and tan of two triangles made using H as an adjacent line to the hypotenuse through the 90deg angle of the original right triangle. Gave up once I got an equation that boiled down to 0 = 0

  • @Hi_Brien
    @Hi_Brien Před 2 lety

    That's a really intuitive proof. I always see people draw squares just on the sides of the triangle and summing their area together and the areas being the same. Thats just a circular argument though and it bothered me.

  • @arihantjha505
    @arihantjha505 Před 7 lety

    perfect

  • @rameshwaria5820
    @rameshwaria5820 Před 4 lety

    Nice

  • @hart7523
    @hart7523 Před 4 lety

    what proof is this?

  • @reyanshshukla7237
    @reyanshshukla7237 Před 6 lety

    awesome

  • @hieverybody14
    @hieverybody14 Před 6 lety +14

    I'm going to fail

  • @ahmadgharana5938
    @ahmadgharana5938 Před 7 lety +2

    thanks beyb

  • @apostleofazathoth7696
    @apostleofazathoth7696 Před 6 lety

    1:02 Not random; arbitrary!

  • @gow.verses
    @gow.verses Před rokem

    nice

  • @ABHISHEKKUMAR-ch5fk
    @ABHISHEKKUMAR-ch5fk Před 5 lety

    never ever took interest in the proof........... thanks a lot very interesting .........

  • @jemsedikabonge5786
    @jemsedikabonge5786 Před rokem

    Wow very simple.

  • @kuroro1984100
    @kuroro1984100 Před 6 lety

    i love u teacher 😍

  • @annu6356
    @annu6356 Před 3 lety

    Tq mam

  • @ffaheem
    @ffaheem Před 7 lety

    How is the small one a square

    • @shaikazaman80
      @shaikazaman80 Před 7 lety

      Faheem Ahmad They took 4 congruent right angled triangle so each C is equal

  • @gauravraj7750
    @gauravraj7750 Před 6 lety

    this helps a lot as an Indian student

  • @killerbunny9318
    @killerbunny9318 Před 5 lety

    My mind is blown 🤯🤯

  • @moinuddinahmed8934
    @moinuddinahmed8934 Před 2 lety

    Peace😊 Love from India🙏

  • @rajnarayanchowdhury5177

    Oh Its great...why dont the teachers teach like this instead of giving the formula directly...thank u so much..Raj from India

  • @robertdepesci3418
    @robertdepesci3418 Před rokem +1

    2 new orleans high school students is using this same explanation to say they've proven the theorem.

    • @jamesvickers3266
      @jamesvickers3266 Před rokem

      I read that their explanation involves the Law of Sines, I did not see sines mentioned at all in this video but I only skipped through it in order to see if sines feature in it. Are you sure?

  • @germanfigueroa9255
    @germanfigueroa9255 Před 8 lety +3

    where the heck does she get 2ab on the left side its aggravating

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +4

      +German Figueroa Do you mean at ~ 3:06? It's because 1/2 ab + 1/2 ab + 1/2 ab + 1/2 ab = 2ab. Add up the 4 fractions (1/2 + 1/2 + 1/2 +1/2) to get 2. Hope that helps. And thanks for watching!

    • @Randoperson45
      @Randoperson45 Před 8 lety

      (a+b)^2=(a+b)(a+b)= a^2+2ab+b^2

    • @germanfigueroa9255
      @germanfigueroa9255 Před 8 lety +2

      thank you i didnt expect a response lol not alot of youtubers do that thank you

    • @Socratica
      @Socratica  Před 8 lety +1

      aww, our pleasure! Good luck with everything! :)

  • @kingkoy7397
    @kingkoy7397 Před 7 lety

    fortunately the most beautiful proof of Pythagorean theorem and the female speaker too.

  • @auriadaffodils7564
    @auriadaffodils7564 Před 4 lety +4

    Oh my god, how do people think of so good constructions, I can't even think a Little.