The Divine Nature - Ryan Mullins & Gaven Kerr (Christian Theology Series)
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 02. 2021
- Patreon: / intellectualconservatism
Podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
Podcast: intellectualconservatism.libs...
Facebook page: / intellectualconservatism
The purpose of Intellectual Conservatism is to defend the true, good and beautiful things of life that are jeopardized in mainstream academia and society. On this page, you will find artwork, music, satire, academic papers, lectures and my own projects defending the duty of conserving these true, good and beautiful things.
Didn't know my brain could melt and I still remain conscious. Great discussion
That was strangely intense and chill at the same time. Great conversation!
Good discussion. On impassibility, I think making the distinction that God is not moved by His creatures and then reinterpreting stories in the Bible that speak in a way that sounds like God is being moved by His creatures is quite different than arguing that the resurrection is political statement etc.
Thanks for putting this together Suan and to Gaven and Ryan for participating!
This is a really great dialogue! My dood, Suan, I have really enjoyed the content on this channel thus far. It is great to see fellow zoomers (i.e. Gen Z) diving into Thomisim.
Poor Ryan, he’s like, I really don’t believe anything Gaven believes and he’s a better arguer than me let’s just keep moving on. So awkward at times lol. Gaven slayed, Ryan is very unorthodox, it all fascinating and interesting AF. Good job to both, stimulating and informative stuff. Crazy deep discussion despite the obvious disagreements.
Can confirm that Gav's tattoos are FIRE
Did anyone notice that Dr. Mullins kept bringing God down to our level in terms of causality?
Well done to Dr. Kerr for endeavouring to help the Thomistic position be better understood, despite the wide gap in metaphysical and apologetic strategies featured in this discussion.
St. Paul wrote a letter to the Corinthians in which he compared his body to a tent, which sounds like Platonic dualism. This means that St. Paul saw himself as a non-physical person with a human body. I wondered how Dr. Mullins would reconcile this dualism with the doctrine of the incarnation.
Oh My Goodness GAVIN absolutely nail a precise and picture perfect refutation to Ryan I like Ryan and all but man Gavin got him really good look at this part and tell me he doesn’t get Ryan here
Comment for traction. This is a great convo
The Divine Catfish argument is the ultimate refutation of classical theism
I’d really love to hear Dr. Edward Feser discuss time with Dr. Mullins. I feel like Dr. Feser took Newton to task in Aristotle’s Revenge. I definitely agree with Dr. Feser that Newton (and seemingly Dr. Mullins) commit the reification fallacy with respect to time by treating it as a substance when in reality “time” is a mere abstraction of changes of real substances with respect to succession. But the substances themselves cause the time, not the other way around.
Just to throw in my two cents worth...
Great video! Keep it up.
Excellent discussion.Informative and educational,
HYPE
Time measures change.
When the guy on the bottom claimed that God existed at a point in time before creation… hoo-boy, that was a doozie