Warhammer 40K Core Gameplay Update Announced - Battleline Buff, Secret Missions and More!
Vložit
- čas přidán 7. 06. 2024
- Let's talk through the teaser preview of the Pariah Nexus mission deck and how it looks like it'll change 10th Edition Warhammer 40K
Article here - www.warhammer-community.com/2...
-- Patreon Page --
/ auspex
-- SubscribeStar --
www.subscribestar.com/auspex
-- Buy Warhammer 40K miniatures here --
UK - Element Games: elementgames.co.uk/?d=10426
USA - Wargame Portal - wargameportal.com/?ref=auspex...
or Amazon also in the USA - amzn.to/3QWzuIC
Australia - Gap Games - bit.ly/3N8VBtj
Canada - Fenris Workshop - shop.fenrisworkshop.com/auspe...
These are affiliate links that also hep to support Auspex Tactics videos, though cost no extra to use.
-- Buy 3D Printers from Elegoo Here --
shareasale.com/r.cfm?b=168032...
Discount Code for $10 off: MKTAuspexTactics
-- Channel Merch --
wargameportal.com/collections...
-- Social Media --
Facebook: / auspex-tactics-1031297...
Discord: / discord
-- Subscribe to Auspex Tactics --
tinyurl.com/yc69mguy
0:00 Intro
0:31 Chapter Approved Pariah Nexus Mission Deck
5:25 Battle Line in Mission Rules
8:53 Primary Mission
11:25 Secondary Missions
13:39 Secret Missions
17:04 Secret Mission Examples + Thoughts
21:53 Outro - Hry
Small Correction - the Terraforming mission can only be done outside of yuor deployment zone. Thanks for the correction on that one!
You should pin this so people don't keep pestering you about it. XD
And you can only do the Terraform action on an objective that hasn't been terraformed already. Stipulated under the Units section. They can only target an objective that hasn't been terraformed. And at the end of the action segment, it says on a success that marker is now terraformed.
hope you do a video about precision rule, if i declare all attacks to go to the hero, and that die with half of the attacks, the rest is gone? or go to the bodyguards? many people argue about this, the rule is not clear
we all know that when you can t produce enough you need new product ...lmfao
At this point I am 75% certain that Auspex is Servitor hired by Games Workshop to spread information in timely and easy to digest manner.
Maybe he is an early man of gold, commanded to plot out potential futures for the emperor of men?
GW is too incompetent to make such a good decision lol
Hired? Servitors don't get paid.
He meant deployed@@saintmayhem9873
nah they wouldn't program him to speak out in any negative way. Unless those are just old memories that burst out of him occasionally through moments of clarity.
Can I just say that I love your presentation style. It's so easy on the eyes and ears. No flashing animations or click baiting ADHD CZcams. I thank you
Truly one of the best bits of insight AT has had is not putting minecraft parkour loops or GTA race loops in the video. I'm so glad he hasn't done that.
Using ADHD for this negative topic is unnecessary. The "sensationalizing" and blatant lies often used to draw people in and flagrant use of colours is made to draw in "normal" people and made by "normal" people. They studied your brain and figured this is how to trick you best. Seems to work due to it being the winning strategy over the last few decade. Though i absolutely despise it for what it is.
Agree with this comment so much.
Love that we're getting a battleline emphasis like raise the banners. Battle line is core in lore I like when they're relevant. Very excited
It is not very good for armies with battle lines you don't want to take or who are not worth to take.
@piotrjeske4599 ....obviously. that's the point of making them more relevant. It's warhammer not hero hammer. That's literally the point to encourage taking them.
@@BloodBuffaloI think you’re missing the point of what he said. For most factions their battleline sucks
@piotrjeske4599 I can't think of many that have this issue.
I think it's mostly nice, but I think there are several detachments for armies that discourage battleline that this makes worse.
Mordian Glory has been running 240+ Tyranid bugs lately, and the basic strategy is to dominate the primary for the first 4 turns, but basically always get tabled by the end of the game. That mission where you have to destroy or shatter all the enemy units would actually almost be a hard counter to this strategy.
If you manage to stop him from (a) going above 40 primaries and/or out do him on secondaries. But yes, it could generally allow you to catch up on primaries to make it out as winner.
For what it's worth, when MG ran it at a tournament, he held two out of three opponents to less than 50 total points at the end of the game, so, yeah, it's a strong strategy to prevent your opponent from scoring primary.
Secret Objectives - wonder if the GW designers happen to be PoorHammer Horde Mode fans?
The delay that comes having these products designed, produced and shipped means these would have been designed too far back to have been shipped now if they had taken a page out of their book. Hopefully in the future though they definately have some great ideas.
Secret Objectives are a thing from other TT games too, the ASOIAF Miniatures game has them and they’re really fun
They would of copy right struck poor hammer first if they wanted to steal their idea.
Could someone link the PoorHammer video where this is discussed? It sounds cool to look into!
What on earth is PoorHammer lol
Auspex: you missed the restriction under Terraforming that it must be outside your deployment zone.
When GW said they were considering rules changes for Admech this isn’t what I expected…
One of these days I’ll be given a reason to paint my toaster boys
Me either. I was hoping for some much-needed points decreases.
If battleline are getting buffed than it’s just another reason to run War Dog spam over big knights
My guess is that wardog spam will stay till CK gets a codex, the codex may offer a 50/50 chance (GW also may want to sell some big knights by then).
War dog spam isn’t going away anyway until the big knights have something going for them, and I say this as someone who stubbornly would never take a list without some big guys
Only way war dog spam is ever going away short of a full faction overhaul is if they force you to take a certain amount of big knights (like removing the character keyword from stalkers so your warlord has to be a big knight)… these rules changes literally can’t make the situation worse in the grand scheme of things.
@@Swampert919 hoping for an overhaul where servitors or other infantry could be added as support
War Dogs spam is less about the big nights not being good enough and more about just how much more efficient the small dogs are
They could straight up minus one toughness to all war dogs give a toughness to all big nights and not even let War Dogs assess their army rules but due to the nature of the game that wouldn't be enough because War Dogs let you do so much more than a big night
What a *nice* amount of cards
That'll be obsolete after a month because of updates GW push lol
Who's gonna tell him 💀
@@scevvin7788 Yeah, completely obsolete. high cost for a months worth of play and as Winters said "We, the players can create better missions"
Nice
Very Nice
A lot of mental gymnastics to avoid a Force Organization Chart.
Yeah, i was happy that it went away, but now i see why it was there. Battleline means nothing now. Just underpowered troops that take up points that valuable meta units could be taking. I feel like all non BL troops need 0cp or something. Or the FOC.
They could just add a requirement of 2 battleline units to the current army building rules.
I'm extremely pleased we don't have the force organisation chart tbf!! Well played GW
@@humbertoharo6840 Yeah! To go with the mandatory HQ unit we already have to take, and the preset of three of each unit type, aaaaand... why does this sound so familiar?
@@jamiehutber9754 You are the minority.
Black Templar battle lines yum yum
7:47 Prepare for the Dread Mob's 50 grots from reserves turn 1!
Those grits will be angrier since they don’t have tanks anymore…
Yeah I'm just going to refuse to play against orks. They are stupid good now
Every edition they do this battleline buff lmao, you'd think they'd just reintroduce the force org chart at some point.
I guess you can't sell those.
Don't give them ideas...lol
It's almost like a force org chart is a really useful thing to have for balance. Seems they keep forgetting that lesson.
Secret missions are pretty cool. Nice to see some battleline love too
If battleline becomes more of a thing, more detachments need to give battleline to whatever units they focus on, or make them count as battleline for missions.
TBF, GW have been doing this more as of late. Orks have Gretchin in Dread Mob, Custodes technically have Prosecutors in NMV but nobodys running NMV for a myriad of reasons, Dark Angels get Outriders in the Ravenwing detachment, and CSM get Traitor Guardsmen in the Chaos Cult detachment.
SM, Nids, Admech and Crons can get fucked though.
I'm not sure they could do that without making a bunch of detachments broken since making a unit battleline also increases its OC by 1 and allows you to take 6 of that unit rather than 3, a lot of detachments are not built for those units to be good objective squatters and be taken in double the amount. Lists will change around the new rules and it will just mean some detachments will be not as strong anymore, but that has always been the case. I don't think we need more additional battleline with detachments since it then defeats the point of giving rules that incentivize the actual battleline units, it's pointless to make changes that favour battleline if you're then just going to turn units into battleline in the detachments where they're strongest.
why not play the regular battleline?
Rapid Escalation sounds fun. I play with a lot of Heavy Intercessors, and 200 pts is a whole 10 man squad. That's 30 wounds of T6 armor move blocking someone hard.
T6 space marines lmfao is that what 40k is now?
@@palwinderdhillon8242 You must not have been around for a long time. Gravis Armor came out in 8th edition I believe, for Primaris? Gravis units are T6, and expensive as all hell compared to normal T4 dudes. They have one Battle line unit in the Heavy Intercessors, 200 pts for 10 man, vs the 160 pts for a normal 10 man of T4 intercessors.
@@palwinderdhillon8242terminators got nudged to t5 so gravis got bumped to 6 in order to preserve their niche
I hope this does improve the scoring mechanics. The Gambit was a cool idea but the possibility was just too remote. However, I can see the competitive sector being upset by Secret Missions, maybe.
not really the tournament organizers will just not allow them
They need to have Secret Missions for comp. It could give struggling armies the ability to compete.
I’ve bought these scenario cards 3 times before… no way. I’m done with that. It should be free in the form of a random table.
Agreed. More money-grubbing from gw.
Same. Got campaign books from 9th that I have literally never gotten to use.
A deck of cards is a random table.
One card is one entry in the random table.
You don't need cards.
Cards look nice.
Perfect timing! My Guardsman Spam and Cultist Spam lists stand ready.
The battleline focus is great and all, but I fear it's going to be horribly unfair in a lot matchups, especially with Green Tide already looking strong.
I mean yeah, but the wider meta is pretty vehicle-heavy, so it makes sense to give more value to battleline and general horde.
Armigar/wardog spam is going to get worse
I can't wait to 3' Deepstrike my necron Warlord on my opponents home objective for 20VP.
But that's the only 20 you'll get on primary
@@braedonmcphedran6668 I don't think that's what the ruling said. Paraphrasing: You can only score up to 20 on the main primary mission if you do the secret missions. So those 20 + the 20 you could get from the secret mission. Also, that total (40) is less than what you could potentially score if you maxed out regular primary, probably precisely for the reason on rules interactions like Hypercrypt being able to pop the warlord on the enemy's home objective in turn 5, which would be especially potent when going second.
That’s what they get for being organic.
I hope this means factions with unreleased codices are getting more battleline units. For example sororitas only have battle sisters, which you really don’t want to run that many of them.
"which you really don’t want to run that many of them." - speak for yourself lol. I love them
With the exception of Orks and maybe another I'm not thinking of, nobody really wants to run that many of their BL troops right now. And by 'that many' as a Space Marine player, I mean 'None'.
As a tyranid unending swarm player, I’m really excited about it!
Tau, orks, death guard, custodes, thousand sons, csm, necron immortals, Imp and chaos knights, grey knights all have solid battle line right now.
Do you hear that?thats the sound of 60 berserkers and there rinos, BLOOD FOR THE BLOOD GOD
As a custodes we have..one battleline unit unless we use a meme detachment.
most armies have one battleline unit
@@wormhistoryhour5completely false, only like 5 armies at the most have only 1 battleline unit, most have 2, and a few have more.
Lol they really dropped battleline from prosecutors just to give it to them with the worst detachment in the game
Terraform is an interesting one, since it looks like only the first person to actually terraform the unit can get those bonus points for the rest of the game(probably why you can't do it on your home objective and why the opponent has the chance to stop it). So once someone's terraformed a objective the other person can't.
Notably, the Terraforming action is only on objectives not within your own deployment zone. That said, this all looks like an exciting shakeup!
GW: "Don't worry, we're not going to make people buy a book for rules updates and competitive missions anymore"
Also GW: "You'll have to buy card decks instead. Fuck you, pay us"
That line was about crusade and narrative books. Where you had things like armies of renown locked away
@chaosmike89th Couldn't of said it better myself!
You are ripping their comment out of the context they provided it. They said you do not have to buy narrative books just to get access to rules for the standard game. This was an issue for 9th, as rules for the imperial agents was only in a short run book that went OOP and then they had the special army rules to staple on top of other armies etc.
Yeah they are fucking pathentic, I won't buy it.
@@timunderbakke8756 Still feels scummy to charge people for competitive rules and updates.
I'm a big fan of these secret missions. I feel like there are some interesting options if you focus on your secondaries and sandbag on primary a bit- I will definitely aim to try getting Magnus in an opponent's deployment zone for at least one game.
Did they just steel Poor Hammers homework
im down for secret missions... that way the opponent cannot voluntarily counter it
Imo the look more promising: (a) the secrecy gives them a better chance, (b) they hand out less points, but (c) still allow for playing the main objectives (aka not killing the game), with a decent disadvantage of capping primaries at 40. Sounds like an ok blend of creating new opportunities without completely hosing the player who is in the lead.
They could still try to figure out what you were up to. But you could also feign one while aiming for another. There's more depth to it.
Would be nice to see a few tertiary units get the battleline keyword based on this.. for example, my inner circle DA force doesnt have any intercessors, but i do have scouts and infiltrators.
If battleline gets buffed looks like GW will be nerfing Green Tide into the ground immediately after getting ork players to buy 120 boyz.
@auspextactics did you notice as well on the community page, the photo next to "Terraforming" shows an Inquisitor, Imperial Agents and Death watch, seems almost like they are sneakily confirming these as one codex id say.
OC0 being locked out of action also would play nice with battleshock rules, so that would be a good change.
Poor nids if that happens. Biovores and deep striking ripper swarms are the only thing keeping them close to 45%
@@robbiepeacocke2465 good riddance, get them something that has them win while playing the game
This caught my attention quickly
I have a feeling that OC-0 units are going to be prevented from doing actions in this new mission season with this focus on battleline.
suddenly, tyranids drop to 12% winrate!
@@FiannaBat ck will take a hit too
@@FiannaBat More reason for GW to buff them. But who am i kidding, them will take away the 0OC bs and make battleshock even worse.
Lol its taking you like seconds after the announcement to make a video about.. Neat!
GW usually only shows stuff three months in advance at most. Meaning this should come before August 15th - so that assumption "around the time of the next balance update" could be right on point.
Really looking forward to this! I love the card deck. Role on Pariah season 😁🎲🎲
I'm guessing it would be wishful thinking to see a re-release of the Indomitus box set? New mission deck looks really interesting, thanks for the breakdown!
"Might be a chance to stop OC0 units doing all the secondaries if they want to."
I genuinely hope for this.
As a 'Nid player it means that our winrate would plummet even further than it already has, and then they would have to make a sincere effort to *correctly* rebalance the faction rather than just veiled nerfs and a shrug of the shoulders. It'd be the most I'd looked forward to summat for my 'Nids since I started playing using the Leviathan box set.
Yes yes yes! I don't own a biovore, I don't want to own a biovore. I have 2 squads of 3 raveners that I know I'm crippling myself for not using a biovore. I think rippers will still be useful for screening but I always feel bad that a bunch of mindless maggots can score points. Let our army get awful so GW can fix it properly.
@@EliteDarkAssassin thing is I printed one recently 'cause I actually quite like both the new model and shooting profile, and hope they undo the doubling of the points cost just 'cause it's part of our most essential cheese strat with the mines, which should be a situational play rather than the "autoinclude 1 to have a chance to win" bullshittery.
Raveners look neat too, but aye their profiles aren't it. Gonna print it's bigger brother instead to use situationally/to scare the crap out of my mates who ain't seen one yet.
Biovore will need a big points cut if they do this!
@@robbiepeacocke2465 all the more reason to do it if ya ask me: I quite like the shooting profile and then using the mines situationally, rather than autoincluding just one to be meta viable.
if OC0 units cant do secondaries theyll literally be useless. no damage, no defence, no holding objectives, barely any screening. theyll just be deleted from the game and yet another model everyone has to put on the shelf forever
I wonder if this will give outsized benefits to detachments which grant additional battleline units. The cultist detachment in CSM or the Ravenwing detachment for DA for example. Outriders might not be useful enough to justify their cost on their own, but if they can do bonus actions, then it might be worth taking a few small units now.
I hope so. Hh already does that
Laughs in Armiger
My intercessors (both assault and normal) are very pleased by this
Command insertion will be great for the 10 terminators with captain in terminator armour I run
What are those tanks behind the “Marked for death” card? The left looks like an immolator, but the one on the right? 13:00
A reason you might want to use the unbroken wall secret mission is if you're behind on primary, like say 0-10 points or something, so then if you can capture the points you can score primary AND the secret mission. It could be possible to go from 0 Primary to 40. Not likely though, though there is now some amount of bluffing you can do since your opponent might expect you to not go for the objectives since you chose a secret mission, and maybe pulls back a bit to protect some units and then you capture the objectives and gain those 20 points. Depends a lot on the playstate.
On the card for Marked for Death it mentiones removing from battlefield for any reason. So putting a marked unit into transport, or putting them into reserves would count towards achieving the secondary, right?
Yep, he mentions that in the video.
@@MrShukaku1991yep you're right. That's what I get for skimming the video while at work
hoping against hope they introduce a way to make more units battleline (give certain leaders "if this is your warlord X unit becomes battleline", like scions?) which will be able to make killa kans battleline in dread mobs so i can run 36 of them completely legally
Battleline going to be important? Illuminor Szeras is eatin' GOOD
Hello Mr Tactics, will there be an army lists and tactics for new csm detachments (or will that be once points are announced)
Would be more ok with the Battleline emphasis if they weren't so stingy with what gets Battleline.
My Tau army pretty much relies on Kroot infantry to fill that font line troop role... But Kroot don't have Battleline outside of their specific detachment, so I'm forced to use "Strike teams 🤮" or invest a bunch of points into Breachers if I want to use the updates???
Strike teams are pretty decent now that they're 20 point cheaper than breachers and got suppression as their special rule instead of better overwatch.
@@tyr7876 I'll have to disagree with you.
They are worse at objective play than kroot, they don't do the damage like breachers, and are still expensive compared to infantry of other factions.
Just because breachers are more expensive, doesn't make strike teams better. It just means you make cuts elsewhere in list building to run the breachers. "Suppression" is cute, but not worth 80 points to run a slow infantry unit that can only threaten the meekest of guardsmen.
@@lewispatton6550 Meh, I run em to great succes. Longer range and same as every infantry choice they do fuckall damage. Only difference beingbthese guys have a utility capable of makeing a unit hit substantially less shots than normal. In some cases, like orks, you can outright make a unit hit half as often as it otherwise would. Its excellent protection for weak ass tau units who evaporate under any firepower because t'au didn't get the toughness boost every single other faction got.
@@lewispatton6550 Also given kroot synergize less with the faction rules and only save 5 points, plus the recent teasers for missions that encorage the battle line keyword on infantry. Strike team is much more bang for your buck.
@@tyr7876 true ... Or you could pay 20 more points to have the breachers wipe the squad of orks instead of making them "hit half as often"
I really like the secret mission idea and that is so many points. Can really messup your opponents idea of what you are playing, or why you re doing the tactics you want.
GREEN TIDE will get from really good to awesome with all the battleline buffs
If I face 120 of them. I will immediately forfeit. I like to have fun
@@ca11rl77I clearly would not play Green Tide in nice casual games, but lots of 40k gamers are playing competetive, so they have to handle it!
@Silverdragon83X minimum requirement for me is to have fun. Green tide does not seem fun to face so I'd rather forfeit and waste my opponents time out of spite
Gasp! Will this finally help fix Admech?!
No.
If by fix Admech you mean everyone else gets worse faster than we do then, yes?
HAHA- no
Green tide is going to be insane with this
Where the secret missions are great are for armies that just generally struggle to keep units alive on multiple objectives throughout 5 turns. By taking unbroken wall, for example, not only do you need to control fewer objectives to max the 20, you can keep more of your army safer to kill your opponent off objectives and to be available to hold the 3 at the end.
The other 3 secret objectives offer options for forces you can't spread out. With a need to either put your opponent on their deathbed or to firce your way into their deployment zone.
These are more compatible with more armies than the gambits which all needed you to have lots of units left.
Its a hail marry play to catch up as opposed to your primary wincon.
@@WilhelmScreamer I think you can absolutely play for it in the right matchups. Think hypercrypt or grey knights against an army with only one to three Battleline. That's a pretty easy 40 points primary that frees up a lot more units to score secondaries.
So Leviathan Deck is no longer usable? Or you can have both mission decks and choose wichever you want to play?
The latter- a tournament could run either deck, and you and your friends can really do whatever you want with them. Leviathan missions with Pariah secondaries/secret missions is definitely fair game for casual play.
But I just bought leviathan… dang it
Idk you can skill play with it if you play casually. Probs my favorite mission pack of all time for now.
Do we think this will replace them for the tournaments though. I haven’t played in one yet but I would like to soon
@@RaiderX7997 yes after it launches I believe their will be maybe a couple of tournament played with the old leviathan mission pack but then it will shift. Don’t take my word for it tho; I’m mostly a casual player who is only interested in competitive to see if my armies are doing good competitively.
My guess is that major tournaments will adopt the new deck, just maybe not right away. They do tend to stay up to date, just so long as it's conditions are drafted *after* the release of the update.
I think the potential of the latter two secret missions is underappreciated. I have tabled my opponents and still lost, on numerous occassions. Tyranids, world eaters and orks have all played my very front heavy. When they loose pressure, they collapse and I table them. By that time however, they have kept me off primaries for so long that I cant catch up. This has happened in numerous games where I am second player. Secret missions sees very usable from a second player perspective. Especially to overcome enemy rush and delay tactics..
Battleline units are usually "weak" units compared to all other units on the table. Allow battleline units to do mission actions and still be able to shoot will encourage more battleline units in lists.
The new Marked For Death looks like it can be abused against Grey Knights; their whole mechanic is pickup/putdown and would give their opponent max points immediately RAW currently.
Of course. 2 weeks after I actually buy the Leviathan Mission Deck lol
Same
Doesn't stop you from still using it, and this probably won't drop till august.
Thank you Auspex for the videos. It doesnt get said enough
Would be nice if terminators got battleline in Inner Circle Task Force, but no, let’s force a 34% army to take units that won’t work with their detachment.
Yeah, I was gonna do a full Deathwing army but this info is deff putting a damper on it
yeah, I started playing Warhammer relatively recently, and I felt like half the units in the Necron codex could be considered battleline in terms of function.
I’m sure there’s a balancing reason for it, but I’m hoping we’d get a few more units that could count.
@@riptide3340The issue is Battleline also means "something you can run 6 of", so if armies whos core units are already good get battleline on it, you'll start seeing Cron lists with like 6 max size squads of Lokhusts. This is both an incredibly uninteresting way to play the game causing for bland lists, and also bullshit to own.
I have a Deathwing Command squad, Deathwing Termie squad, and 2 Deathwing Knight squads. I have not run all of it since the beginning of 10th. Its just not worth it, and my plan to run a Deathwing Command at 10 models, with a Captain in Termie armor, and a Strikemaster is now shredded, so ive chosen to do a Deathwatch Veteran spam instead for memes.
I'm all for new missions periodically, but the change I really want to see is the removal of Power Level. Sorry, "free wargear."
Boy am I looking forward to guard getting nerfed into the ground after a tournament cycle if the new objectives will focus battleline
How would it be possible, for custodies?
Some times? Lol! Thanks for the update!
Custodes can’t use a 5-model guard squad for rapid deployment for a 2k game. They can’t use any at 1k. It’s just funny at this point.
Yeah the only option would be to use a 4-model squad without a character, which would probably get blasted.
Then it’s time for you to play Null Maidens /s
That is what happens when you have a codex designed for the game stats 6-9 months ago. Means that with a 6 months rules update cycle , by the time GW "notices" a problem they are in the second year of an edition, and by then they practicaly only think about the next edition for already released armies.
You would have access to imperial agents that have their own battleline options.
Alternatively if you are playing custodes and are playing a friendly game you can just ask to have that mission rule removed from the pool (and most tournaments pick specific mission rules to keep the game as balanced as possible, honestly kinda doubt they’ll use rapid deployment given it benefits some factions more than others).
EDIT: The other option is just accept your highly elite army isn’t gonna be able to utilise the mission rule if you pull it and try to adapt the best you can… there’ll always be best and worse case scenarios for mission rules for every faction.
Im pretty much out of 40k now but I do love Auspexes videos
I personally would much rather gw made battleline datasheets stand up on their own merits rather than use missions to penalise you for not using these subpar units.
Im new. So are ALL these rules for the core? do i have to have these
So the pariah Nexus box is the new legal one? Or can you just play whatever you want? This is like the latest edition of missions?
The deck is a few months out and will become the primary form of matched play when it drops. You still have the leviathan one if you want to use it.
These all look dead exciting and I can't wait to freshen up my games with them. The current decks were very serviceable and still are, but after as many games as I've played, it's very welcome to get something new.
Secret missions spund at first like a decent option in team games. That 20 points could bring a loss to a draw in those landslide games
Green Tide might be really good with these missons
Sure would be nice if Knights got a mission more favoring them. We/They do not typically have enough units for half of the missions
As a chaos knight player who runs wardog spam this battle line buff is great
Rather new here. Do you think it likely that this will be accompanied by something similar to the Leviathan Box but for necrons-admech? 🤔
I doubt it. Usually those 2-faction boxes are reserved for the start of an edition. Plus they will ALWAYS have one of the armies be Marines, without fail. And probably most importantly are huuuge value over buying the kits separately, and we all know GW hates giving us freebies.
Add a comment...😢
Update the Deathwatch ☠
Battlelines think about.
happy battleline is becoming important.
Just the fear of drawing Servo Skulls being removed will be great. I only played it once and every time it's drawn we veto it but still I just want it gone.
I really like this change and am looking forward to it. This feels better than “buy a mission book that doesn’t change a ton” every quarter like 9th edition
Pweh does Rapid Escalation even have the 9 inch distance rule? because otherwise this makes turn 1 charges stupendously easy. This is especially good for something like Green Tide to just clog up some enemies.
Oh something else to chew on, that's not directly related to the new missions but the photos used: the one of Imperial Agents that, aside from the Imperial Henchmen, further in the back they're backed up by...Deathwatch marines. Hrm.
Why did I just get this notification? How did I miss a video for 4 whole days?
mine field is mortals on an advance roll of a 6.
this sounds alot more fun than the current deck ngl
Anything to make swarm Tyranids the correct way to play is a positive
Will get released, least impactful options will get picked by AOW or ITC people will play them over and over on identical tables as thats the mission pack for an random event they are going to some time in the future. Tables will remain dire L shaped ruins.
Anything that means more battleline I think is a good thing. As they really don't have to be played at all currently. I know many that don't play any and just use tanks and monsters.
I'm super excited for this update, old missions were getting stale and smaller units were getting pushed out of the meta because of the strength toughness maths
Can you do a video on the price increase, not just mini but games like Space Marine going up to 60usd for seemingly no reason.
They still need to fix Battleshock. So many armies use it as a core mechanic, and it's downright useless.
Damn this is odd, might just buy the pack and use the scret missions and some cards from levithan
My issue with 10th wasn't the core rules. Its the codex rules and release structure.
Laughs in pure infantry guard
Sectret missions do sound better than Gambits, mind that does not make it good, but I guess we will see how it works in game.
So... why would we need new editions if we can have "core rule updates" now?
I mean, outside of the obvious forced way to make all our books obsolete on a regular basis.
Yeah, it’s kinda bad when GW updates their core game rules faster than some live service video games lol.
So my retaliation cadre is boned then?
Stealth suits/crisis battleline please gw?
nuh uh gw hates tau (wtf did they give us 3 detachments??)
@@Snaek1Yeah that was honestly crazy to see.