Signal detection theory - part 1 | Processing the Environment | MCAT | Khan Academy
Vložit
- čas přidán 11. 09. 2024
- Created by Ronald Sahyouni.
Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacadem...
MCAT on Khan Academy: Go ahead and practice some passage-based questions!
About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
Subscribe to Khan Academy’s MCAT channel: / @khanacademymcatprep
Subscribe to Khan Academy: www.youtube.co...
I don't understand why people are complaining, I found the explanation to be quite good, and was actually expecting a good response from others as well
My
My
thank you!
This is the most confusing video I've found on Khan Academy.
i actually got what it meant but there are things that he didn't explain at all that's why it's confusing
yeah bro I agree he describes absolute threshold at 1:20.
Thank you. This video was helpful.
Radar example
The decision: Does a fish exist under water in close proximity to the vessel? yes or no
The uncertainty: Can not see under water - must rely on afferent stimulus / visual cues from radar detection system
hit - radar detects and fish exists - Decision = yes
miss - radar doesn't detect and fish exists - decision made = no
False alarm - radar detects fish and no fish exists - Decision = yes
rejection - radar does not detect fish where no fish exists = decision = no
everyone thinks that's confusing because he didn't explain it right well the truth is he did explain correctly it's just you guys are not well educated about this topic. First, ya need to start from the beginning like signal detection theory for dummies then and you come here to watch this. thanks, sir anyway.
ياريت لو شرح بالعربي
"If one can't explain something simply, he/she doesn't understood it properly "
"him hoon spik english, mak grate cumunicatr"
You can summarize it to, if the light is there and you say is there is correct if its there and you say no is wrong. Duh
Salma Kazmi 🤣
Thats a horrible video , made me more confused ,, I bet Sal would explain it way better than this