Should You Play Accesscode Talker? | Yu-Gi-Oh! Master Rule 5
Vložit
- čas přidán 5. 09. 2024
- Video Sponsored by Ridge Wallet:
www.ridge.com/...
Use Code “DZEEFF” for 10% off your order
Twitter: / dzeeff
Facebook: / dzeeffyoutube
Comparison shop for the best prices on TCGplayer: bit.ly/3aYIaHe
⭐Equipment I use⭐
Computer: goo.gl/d1WQib
Monitor: goo.gl/24VnK4
Microphone: goo.gl/2Dt3aa
Video editor: goo.gl/TGSz6j
#YuGiOh #dzeeff
Thank you Ridge for sending me this wallet and supporting the channel! Here’s the site if you
want to check them out: www.ridge.com/DZEEFF
Use Code “DZEEFF” for 10% off your order!
dzeeff I see
do you think code talkers can be meta after this set.
Sorry to dissapoint, but I do like my bulky wallet. :P
I needed this
I think it would be more enjoyable if you would just have a quick disclaimer in the beginning saying like "This video is sponsored by ridge wallets" in like 2 seconds and then talk about them again at the very end. I also think this might increase the advertising effect since they would be mentioned multiple times. Just a thought.
It's always interesting to see these old takes on modern staples.
Ayup, looks like Doug zeef was right
I like this kind of name for a video “Should you play X card” feels much more interesting than “How good is X card”
As a Code Talker player, I'm just glad the deck finally has some good spot removal
Owen Rickitt is there a good way to play with an end board that isn’t trying to extra link?
Same. I like how codetalker@ignister has a couple new boss monsters, this and the arrival cyberse.
the card will be used by tye meta nor by code talkers
@@stonalisa3729 The best non-Extra Link board you can get consistently is a 4 counter Darkfluid with I:P Masquerena as Link Material next to Excode Talker. If you're fortunate enough, you'll be able to get a Cynet Conflict set for a 5th negation.
Asking for more is just a slim chance, but better is still possible. I once had a Turn 1 test hand that ended with Accesscode in the EMZ co-linked to Excode, which was also co-linked to Transcode and an I:P Darkfluid with a set Cynet Conflict and at least 1 Cyberse Synchron in the GY. 5 negates, 3 monsters that can't be destroyed by card effects, the other can't be targeted with effects, Accesscode Talker protection by battle or card effect, and a total of 25,400 and 4-6 cards to destroy Turn 3.
Of course, there's ways around it, but it felt really cool to see that potential. Even if you can't get Darkfluid on Turn 1, Accesscode Talker could still be useful, especially if you run Talkback Lancer.
"Borreload takes 3 monsters which is a big investment"
*looks at crusadia players going double 4 material saryuja*
The modern age Dark Armed
They made DAD into a link 4, nice
I was just thinking that
DAD? What's that?
@@jollyjelly304 Dark Armed Dragon
Going second, making knightmare phoenix into unicorn into Access pop's 2 cards + 1 s/t and a shuffle, real good for my mekk knights.
I think a better use in Mekk-knights would be Lib into this. An non-targeting, non-destructive source of removal your opponent can't respond to (make Lib chain link 1) seems pretty powerful.
Cyberse decks are really happy right now
@Ignistar player here, can confirm. You usually have better things to be doing than try to make ACT, but my god it feels so good to land that clutch comeback with it if your opponent gets over The Arrival.
Malik Smith Hey! Another @ignister player here, but I found it best to try to make Firewall Dragon Darkfluid instead, as-
-It’s a link 5, so it’s easier to make than The Arrival.
It gains 2500 atk for each type of Extra Deck monster in the grave (For the sake of this, Rituals are counted, but links are not, so you can boost a 3000 atk monster to at most 13000, since XYZ, Fusion, Ritual, and Synchro are all counted.
-It gains up to 4 monster negations (One for each type of Extra deck monster used to make it, see above.).
-You really haven’t lived until you’ve cleared your opponents board using Light Dragon and Wind Pegasus @ignister only to then link Light Dragon @ignister, and Dark Templar @ignister to make Firewall Dragon Darkfluid and attack directly for 8k.
-It’s really cheap, last time I checked it was $5, and you really need to play only one anyway.
Malik Smith Also, what are you using in way of making negations with @ignister because I haven’t found any good way to make any.
Intelectuals: *use dzeeff's tcgplayer link*
True Intelectuals: *buy wallets to support dzeeff*
if i buy that vallet i will have no money left to put in it
"At first glance this might not seem that good"
Huh? A dark armed dragon with atleast 3.3k ATK if you used a Link monster to bring it out that you dont need to draw into since you summon it from the extra deck and that your opponent cannot react to, making it one of the safest cards to break boards period. What about this doesnt seem good in first glance.
The fact that not everyone realizes they have like 3 link monsters with different attributes in their GY at all times and think they can't activate it. That's what I first thought
@@dracoblizzard7944 Forgot Knightmares were in the game?
Hey dark armed is actually a pretty good comparison
@@haruhirogrimgar6047 Just like how Yugioh players forgot how to read. :P
To add on, it's an even superior Dark Armed Dragon. DAD's effect could at least be negated. This thing is coming out with bare minimum 4300 attack (since essentially every Link climb to 4 has a minimum of a Link 2) with omni-protected destruction and the cost is hilarious at best since majority of Links don't care about being removed after Link climbing.
Accesscode breaks salamangreat. Update jammer--Transcode plays now go one step further. Accesscode targets transcode, makes it humungous. Update jammer allows Accesscode to attack twice. You probably have a Balelynx in the grave, so banish fire, earth, wind, thats 3 pops. Disgusting. That will cleanup any board.
In hindsight accescode should require at least 3. This is bonker with Selene or any deck that can spam Link 3 (Daigusto into Gaiasaber?
I'm gonna play this card because I like the codetalker/cyberse deck in general. Hope it won't become too expensive.
Now I just need code generator and code exporter imports and the deck is finally complete.
TCG hasn't been too kind to us Code Talker players.
Same and I agree I hipe its cheap amd people ignore it.
Also yeah Konami hates CodeTalker players
It wont be cheap too generic and good
Daniel Espitia budget players in other words
Its up to $100 a copy now
2 years later after el dorado I can say that accesscode is still an utterly insane card
I miss playing Yu-Gi-Oh in person...
And i miss person
Can't miss playing in person if you've never done it yet. :P
Same.
I think the biggest reason you would want to play accesscode talker is because of crytron halqifibrax and celene. If you can make Haliqifibrax you could summon an effect vieler from the deck use the vieler for the relinquished link-1(although some don't do it) then make celene get back a spellcaster from the gy and go into accesscode talker allowing you to go +3 off of his effect or more depending on other link monsters in your gy.
I wanna point out the topping striker list in the online tournament ran this. Although without the relinquished link-1
This is so good in salads. It can be made from only 2 monsters. Link 2 cyberse into splash mage. Use it to revive something. Link into transcode and revive splash mage. Ez link into accesscode. And with 3 monsters you can go into update jammer to let accesscode atk twice for an otk.
The other day I broke the P-Magicians negations board with Accescode and the player didn't know why he couldn't response haha.
LET'S GOOO
Just Link into it with The Arrival @Ignister and have it gain 6000 ATK.
Link 4 Beatstick, anyone?
now THAT's silly
I've done that when my arrival was hit and had 0atk,loved my ops response lmao
This is what happens when you complain about getting your dark armed dragon solemn'd...
Firewalld:and what did u did?
Accescode:being too good for my meta
Firewall:welcome to the cool kids club 😎
Revan Not funny Bro
Nothing really
Ah, another Cimoooooooo vide- wait.
Fun Fact about Accesscode Talker. It can pop ITSELF!! Make it with 2 Different Attribute Links, and you have 3 pops, not 2.
?
@@Tealmaker bit late but accesscode can banish itself from the field to get another pop
This card makes a Code talker extra link even easier
yeah but extra links are awful strategies in MR2020
@@alonsoarancibia7257 but extra link iblee locks
Video idea: Do a review of each core set cover card, and then suggest what should have been the cover card for that set as the most impactful card in that set.
Stephen G I could get down to appolosa being the cover card for rising rampage
In the OCG they make it by summoning Effect veiler with Needlefibre, making Selene and (assuming you have spells in grave) bringing back Effect veiler to Accesscode talker. 5300atk and 2 pops off. 👌
My buddy was just going on about that wallet. When they make one with a Star Trek logo, I'll buy it.
It does seem durable enough to live long and prosper.
Still should’ve been called Sourcecode talker
with its successor being Leakedcode Talker
Nill Null I did and I don’t care
Im even using it in dragon link, why? When I dont have Savage I ca use normal combo and bring saryuja to the field, use it to make spheres and then make accescode talker, 4 pops, earth saryuja, wind romulus, dark any link and light spheres
I'm like Hell yeah because it's actually a pretty good card. Can gain a bunch of attack to beat over most monsters. It can potentially destroy up to 6 cards on the field but usually 2 or 3 is enough to break well established boards. Also both of its good effects can't be responded to by your opponents effects. Another great going 2nd card.
When you said that "the vid is sponsored by r...." i was like ah shit here we go again, but then experienced the biggest relief of my life
Would you ever review the whole code talker archetype? I’m trying to find a way to break cyberse but extra links don’t matter to a lot of strategies these days
I don't generic cyberse can be broken. They got speed, and their extra deck has a wonderful toolbox, but they run out of steam real real fast.
The biggest problem is they lack recovery and they a very few of the key combo pieces have no gy effects
Ironic enough, this synergizes pretty well with @Ignisters.
they should make:
Internet Taller
Link-8
LIGHT Attribute.
3+ Link Monsters
5000 ATK
Must be link summoned, If this card is link summoned you can equip as many link Monsters from you GY and banish zone, as possible and this card gains the combined ATK and Effects of those equip cards along with link ratings x1000. Unaffected by your opponents cards. This card gains 1 additional Attack times the number of cards equip to it. Once per turn you can destroy all cards your opponent controls.
Plz do more of these for other cards!
It’s good in ignisters when you use gatchuri @ ignister and the link 6 to link summon it becomes unaffected and at 8300 atk so awesome
Kaiju, lmao
+Dzeeff What about Borrelsword Dragon? In which situation is Borrelsword a better card to use than Accesscode?
Dark Armed Dragon on steroids
Doug you’d best not be stepping into Anthony Fantano’s territory, he’s the Internet’s Busiest Ridge Wallet Salesman.
inb4 "Konami again demonstrates why Links are an inherently broken mechanic."
Im waiting for the day that Borreload Savage Dragon gets reprinted, because its $67 USD. I could've bought it when it was $30 USD.
Im super salty.
i saw it for 12 dollars on tcg player so where are you looking?
I remember I was trying to talk someone on eBay down from $45 to $40 for Borreload Savage back when the quarantine started. A few months later, I asked myself why I didn’t just pay the $45.
2020 Tin of Lost Memories says "Hello!"
I'm glad that I got this when Savage Strike dropped, but seeing the meta overkill makes my Rokket deck mad.
@@RawwkinGrimmie64 you have no idea how excited I was when I heard the news. I am so happy. :)
Zach Schneekloth was spanish and i got for 15 dollars because of shipping
Trust me, this card is broken in cyberese. You can summon this card and at least pop 5 card, its crazy.
This card is such a meme on ygo pro, people have no idea why they can't negate the effects think the cards bugged, not reading at it's finest
BUTTONS
Don't blame not reading do you WANT to be doxxed? You can read your own address and credit card info.
You will claim this ridiculous size text is necessary for problem solving but 1: this only applies offline and 2: This still has the same problem as vague text because no-one but you is going to read every single line of text on every single card
So sit down and read off to me every single card in your deck, my deck, another guy's deck, or stfu
Do you agree, there's kind of a pattern here with recycling old iconic cards. Sure, Lightning Storm and Three Tactical Talents are obvious, but also Appolusa is quite similar to LADD, and this card is similar to DAD
I wanna know about your opinion on masked hero dark law and the current heros in the meta in general.
Short answer: Dark Law is still very powerful and HEROES are a nice rogue deck. Long answer: HEROES have some good otk builds and can build some insane boards but can’t always survive a board wipe. And Dark Law stops a lot of decks and kills them if they don’t have an out
Id say many decks aren't bothered by Dark Law these day. With the right board HEROES can be very powerful but a lot of the time they just can't recover from their board being wiped, or they can't play past a board with a couple negates.
Heroes are good, they have some of the best boss monsters in the game and the ability to OTK out of nowhere. they just desperately need some form of searchable negation.
Dark Law is their only good going first option unless you intend to invest 3 cards into Plasma as well. The deck isn't going to do anything and it hasn't done anything. If it couldn't top last format or the format before it isn't going to get through Adamancipator and Eldlich. It even just struggles with other rogue decks.
Reminds me of Gallantmon with an Imperialdramon Paladin Mode upgrade.
So with Accesscode being Link 4 / 2+ effect monsters , does this mean I can link summon him using:
- Link 3 and 1 effect monster
- Link 2 and another Link 2
- Link 2 with 2 effect monsters
All these are valid summoning conditions?
yes you're correct.
The easiest way to summon it though is to play 2 copies of effect veiler. Use a generic monster and a tuner (ash, veiler or whatever else your deck might play) to summon crystron halqifibrax, use halqi to summon a veiler, use veiler and halqi to make selene, queen of the master magicians (as veiler is a spellcaster), pop three counters to summon a veiler again and make accesscode. You now have a 5300 atk accesscode with 2 or more banishable materials in grave.
Accesscode is the win condition for so many decks so yea you should
I’ll still play Borreload and Sword as my 2 going 2nd Link-4’s but in decks that can fit a 3rd, Accesscode is probably better than Avramax.
I did try accesscode talker but i still prefer i.p and update jammer summoned avramax or borreload with update jammer in salads. Althought idk if i'd try it in other cyberse deck in case i manage to find some cyberse deck that would be budget friendly.
Summon five headed link dragon using 5 attributes, go into accesscode, laugh in casual as you end all the things.
Guess whos back?
Back again?
Dzeefs back
Tell a friend!
Firewall is the most Powerful Link Monster ever
In hindsight accescode should require at least 3. This is bonker with Selene or any deck that can spam Link 3 (Daigusto into Gaiasaber?
Yes !!!!
Yes, I should really play him in my dino deck.
oh noooo rich wallet now also has infected my favourite pack opening channel
Another thing to mention is that Accesscode Talker technically cannot have his summon negated.
Wdym?
Yes you can with judgement
He means that he has an on summon effect, and Accesscode states that no card or effects can be activated in response to any of his effects.
That’s not quite right. It’s summon can be negated with a card like solemn strike. What you can’t do is use something a trap hole or torrential tribute because the attack gaining effect goes first and you can’t respond to it.
chompyzilla same principle applies. Accesscode talker’s effect activates first since turn player has priority response. Next, that is when the non-turn player should respond, but due to Accesscode Talker’s effect, the non-turn player cannot. Solemn strike is still being activated in response to a summon, which cards like bottomless trap hole and torrential tribute also have the same response timing.
Not that hard to have Linkross, Halqifibrax, Phoenix and maybe even Unicorn in the grave heading up to this, although Accesscode could banish itself instead of Unicorn but it's a spin.
I’m here 1 year later to say Accesscode is a U$140 card that made relevant impact in multiple formats
10:04 because going first has too much advantage
A spell speed 4 dark armed dragon that is in the extra deck
That has tons of attack. Oh ya this is a good idea
I’m buying one today idk if I should get the gold one or el de Maximo one with gold
I'm really upset that this card is so expensive rn. I've been working on a code talker deck and I was hoping this card would be overlooked😂
There is ZERO reason you should not have this in your ED besides money. It's destruction has protection, at bare minimum it is coming to the field with 4300 attack AND his destruction effect is not even once per turn. As we have seen with Apollousa, it isn't hard to bring out 1-2 more monsters on top of a Link 4. So this thing hits the field as a huge beater that will likely nuke a field with no counterplay to the destruction and either end the game or put your opponent in a very dire situation.
Wow thanks dude, my Ridge wallet looks amazing and it's to compact. It made my girlfriend stop cheating on me because she saw my wallet and ended up breaking up with her E boy on Runescape to focus on me.
Thanks for the wallet dude, best purchase of my life
Yeah, this card shouldn't exist. Or better saying, it shouldn't be generic.
Please mind that effects can still be activated to Accesscode's effects resolution.
No
I agree it’s better than borreload and the mekknight but is it better than borrelsword in terms of winning the game?
Borrelsword gains atk and atks twice, this can pop 1-6 cards and can atk twice if played with update jammer, so it's call, and this requires 2 monsters, sword requires at least 3 effect monsters
Based on the time tbh
Doug? Did you notice a small nitpicky mistake you made?
Using Union Carrier as link material for Accesscode Talker like you used as an example is bad. I mean, it would be to difficult to use it as a link material. Better to find a way to get a different link monster of board, maybe Anaconda or Cross-Sheep, and use that as Accesscodes material
Union Carrier Pass, opponent somehow doesn't pop Union because it isn't a threat anymore. Use it for Access or if it did get popped then it is a different attribute in GY.
So.. does the inability to respond extend to effects the monster might have when destroyed, or can it proceed to start its own chain immediately after?
It starts its chain after I believe. The destruction would resolve before your monster can attempt to activate.
I might be wrong but I doubt it
After the monster is destroyed, you can activate any GY effect. For example, if Accesscode activates the effect to destroy Dotscaper, your opponent will not be able to chain with Cynet Conflict. Dotscaper is destroyed. Dotscaper can then activate it's effect to special summon itself.
Make a video on top 5 cards that you can’t respond to.
Jokes on you I play Excharge 😅😅😅😬
Hopefully Accescode talker will be reprinted in 2021 Megatin, so that prices drop
how does this compare to borrelsword I see decks with both or just one borrelsword or accescode
So this is the new dark armed dragon
Now I get the the idea for the effect of accesscode talker so what you're sayin I can banish all six Link monsters with different attribute but i can't banish the same attribute as like let's say if I would to banish the same fire attribute but it's a different link monster it will not work right
I hope this video doesnt result in a buyout, i really want to get this card cheap
Almost 50$
@@gamalielcolon9399 I know, im over here crying lol
F
Cyberse and code talker decks
We gottem boys
you can just veiler/imperm / use removal after the on-summon effect resolves, right?
That's if it isnt colinked with a transcode talker.
Actually no. According to the rules, the non-turn player can only use quick effects in response to the turn player’s actions(ex. Activating card effects, summoning a monster, entering any phase of the turn.) So, unless the turn player performs an action other than using Accesscode talker’s effect, the non-turn player cannot use a quick effect.
@@strikerstratos You can respond to summons. Chain Imperm to summon, you don't need to negate the summon or wait.
@@Cabezaxcore That's not true. After any effect resolves, the game does not immediately go back to an open game state. After an effect resolves, both players have an opportunity to activate a fast effect at that time. This could include Veiler or Impermanence. Once both players have no fast effects they wish to activate is when the game goes to an open game state.
I think this guy cheated against me with this card. I used mask change on my absolute zero to make acid and destroyed his whole field. But this card wasn’t destroyed i believe bc another link monster was beside him to keep it safe from destruction.
But then I used rainbow neos SEND effect and it was immune to that too with nothing else on the field for him. Then I attacked with a hero and sunrise destroy effect activated and he still wasn’t destroyed. It wasn’t that combo with the 0 attack 3000 defense monster combo bc the only monster on the field was access code talker. I double checked the monsters in his gy I didn’t see anything that made him immune to everything forever. A few once a turn immune to destruction but they were gone but also more than once and also rainbow neos says send and doesn’t target.
This was In Md. I’d love to know how he did it to make him immune to everything or if he cheated so I can report him.
Meanwhile, I'm over here saying "oh, Heavy Forward looks like a good card!"
It is 🙂
Ghost Mourner & Moonlit Chill dosen't counter it so thats a bit sad
He says we haven’t gotten any good new cards. Then within the next year. Drytrons and dragoon arrive….
Peep the Cold Stone card
Spell Shattering Arrow
Should I buy a Ridge wallet or a copy of Lightning Storm? *think*
How many tournaments do you plan to go to compared to how many times you flex at the grocery store when you go to pay :)
Could you explain the wallet meta game?
Are tri-folds too old to keep up or do you think they just need more support to make a comeback?
I also need to know the state of money clips right now.
Yes, IMO money clips are very linear. They only do one thing good and that's clips cash.
If you have an Unchained deck...yes
Aged very good
Not a melon channel 1:00
Yes
Do you think that the seal of oricalcos would help in tournaments and i'm curious that what would happen if someone in the Yugioh anime after GX used it will it Really help?
I mean seal of orichalcos is banned cuz it’s way too powerful. Plus Konami didn’t wanna have to deal with the legal trouble of having people killed in tournaments cuz their opponent used seal.
I just came back to Yugioh after a few years away (I stopped playing when Links first came out), so I’m not sure I’m reading/using this card in the right way (it seems way too good). Maybe someone can help me out? 😅
I have a board with a copy of each, Bujinki Arashima and Neptabyss, the Atlantean Prince. I’m able to use Bujinki Arashima and Neptabyss to Link Summon Accesscode Talker, who then gains 2000 attack points because Bujinki Arashima is a Link-2. I can then banish Bujinki Arashima to destroy a card my opponent controls. Am I doing this correctly? It seems stupid lol.
I play a code talker deck so I have to use it.
same
Am i like the only player that uses NoodleFiber in Shaddols?
It's link DAD
I watch your video's for a while now and i still dont know what that link rating means. Is it that a link 4 takes 4 monsters? Or that you first have to summon a Link1, than 2, etc.? I get confused about the '2+' monsters.
Link rating is pretty much the same as "lv" so a link4 has a link rating of 4
A link1 has a link rating of 1
@Moha that's not what he asked, but that is a good answer
@moha, so a link 4 takes 4 monsters, or 2 link 2 monsters? Or a link 3 and a link 1?
@@MsMiDC acesscode works like that
Who thinks Decode Talker Heatsoul will break the metagame
It won't because it requires cyberse monsters as link material and the only cyberse deck in the meta right now is salamangreat and the deck is only one attribute. Second the draw 1 card eff isn't good either its entirely based on how much damage your opponent does to you its very situational. The otk salamangreat currently has is way better. I wouldn't put it in my deck. Lastly whats the point of banishing from the field to summon a link 3 cyberse anyway? I wouldn't put so much into summoning this when again I can just transcode using update jammer bring it back and go for game. But thats what I have to say.
@@rickyhonablue236 u know the effect only requires u pay 1000 life points and the banishing effect is totally optional and dosn't actually require opponent interaction except if the ash or ghost ogre it
I am from the future and the answer is YES YES YES