AI will blow up Hollywood - but not how you think
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 08. 2023
- What do you think? Leave a comment, like and subscribe!
Check out the Storybook Studios website and full AI video showcase here: storybookstudios.ai
Want to learn Stable Diffusion? Watch my basics tutorial here: • How to Install and Use...
Link to the Corridor Crew video I mentioned: • Is this AI Art, or is ...
----------------------------------------------
Follow me on Twitter for more: / albertbozesan
Get the A.I. writing tool that I use! Sudowrite gifts you 10.000 bonus words only with this link: www.sudowrite.com/?via=albert (Affiliate Link - this supports me!)
I think one of the biggest thing I appreciate with the current state of AI is that it's open source.
As you said exactly in the video, everyone has access to it, not just big companies. Artists should learn the tech and use it for themselves, so they are on even playing ground with corporations who have had the upper edge
I would argue that the protest in Hollywood isn't really about AI, it's about corporations finding new to exploit and underpay their workers. Something they would've done whether it was with AI or something else. The protesters have very good reasons to be protesting and I hope they succeed, if only for the precedent it sets.
Other than that, I very much agree with you. It seems to like we're at the start of an indie revolution in in animation and filmmaking, which I'm so excited for. The corridor crew showed some of the potential here with their rock, paper scissors anime and I can't wait for more creatives to adopt the method and iterate on it in various directions.
I'm hoping we'll see something similar to what happened in the gaming industry, where there's a thriving indie scene that continously drives innovation while the big studios stagnate and turn more and more predatory.
I would love to see tutorials explaining the kind of work you do with your studio. (Loras would especially be helpful to me 😅).
I would also love to see some tutorials going over previous topics with a new spin/topic (or maybe even just a livestream). Maybe it's just me, but I find it easier to learn when I see a few different examples of the process, so I don't mind the topic being repetitive or if it doesn't - strictly speaking - teach something new.
Thank you for your comments! I also hope the striking artists find a way to share in the enormous wealth their work generates.
More videos about my new work are coming!
if ai is used as a tool and everyone keeps they're job then there's nothing to be afraid of but if everything is ai in the future then we are fucked, and it's so sad to see so many people with so little hope about the future.
This is the right take. The evolutions of our society is nuanced and complex. Lots of people are losing while lots more are winning. This is a win for everyone and it's going to be less of a win for the elites.
My SO does future research professionally and studied technological revolutions - the amount of jobs something like this creates is always larger than the amount it destroys.
I would say if Amazon figures out a worker bot that can take care of all the jobs humans do in a warehouse it would be a huge win for elites...and I don't think they will be too concerned about finding replacement jobs for the workers they displace
Hollywood is just scared cause now they know they no longer are the gatekeepers. They no longer hold all the keys. It used to be about "who you know" if you wanted to succeed in entertainment/Films but now AI is doing away with that, and it's amazing. The Free market will now dictate more than ever what gets seen and what doesn't. Even Disney is falling, and they used to be untouchable. It's a new dawn. I think things are gonna get super exciting for creators.
Creativity is like a muscle, if you don't exercise it, it will atrophy. Some day in the future, almost everybody will have handed over their creativity to a machine. The spark of devine (which creativity is for me) will extingt in humans. That's my biggest worry.
Are you just living in Germany or are you german?
Because your english is flawless! Well maby you grow up bilingual.
If you are then Grüße aus dem Ruhrgebiet :)
I grew up in California :) Grüße zurück aus München!
I think creativity will just change. Most of us don't know how to write with a chisel into stone, but we're still writing - possibly better than ever. We'll probably get bored of AIs painting for us pretty soon and come up with a whole new genre.
I believe the underlying cause, why the movie industry is kind of spiraling down right now is not AI. Streaming platforms are the big issue. Just like spotify did for music, movie streaming platforms force writers to please the mighty recommendation algorithm in order to succeed. The result is movies that feel like copies of copies. There is no room for OG content anymore. I am afraid that, once AI tools can be used to produce captivating images (tbh, I am already tired of the Runways Gen1 "holo images"), we will produce even more content that has no soul and no originality.
I believe the audience will punish soulless behavior long-term. Look at Barbie - it may be based on popular IP, but it has incredible heart and thought behind it. It’s so clearly made by humans, and people are *flocking* to theaters to watch.
well many years of going woke, and making that their big thing and 5 plus years of mega summer wokebusters tanking entire vfx houses because their insane costs and generally making stuff no one wants to see is the real issue. Jesus: if it's someones taste to watch high octane michael bay bioptic on WW2: fantastic, and could be a audiance for that. If they make it and find out their isn't then do it years on end and go: hmm why'd we go broke? well... don't wonder if you made a billion dollar risk that failed horribly many many many times.
totally agreed !
I don't know why people are so afraid of it. It's just like the introduction of digital painting. Many people were against it saying it's not art if it's not on paper. But then what happened ,everyone accepted it and embraced it.(But some still reject it).
Having grown up during both technologies as they emerged, it's much less comparable than you're making it out to be. Digital painting makes the processes of illustration and painting easier; you're still using your own manual skills and your own interpretation of everything you've seen to create your images. There are techniques that use other people's work more directly, like photobashing, but A) it's much easier to tell when something is photobashed vs hand-painted, and B) I'd argue you should have permission from the original image owner depending on how how much of it is still recognizable in your final picture.
With AI, anyone can prompt an image and have the machine do 99% of the "interpreting" of their basic prompt and all of the images it was trained on. The question of how much creative work and intention came from the human prompter is impossible to answer unless the they're completely transparent about their process. Even worse, it's orders of magnitude easier for someone to lie about their AI generation being hand-drawn than it was for digital illustrators to lie about their work not being traced or stolen from someone else's online gallery.
This isn't to say AI CAN'T be used as a legitimate tool instead of a replacement for the creative process, or that it can't be sourced ethically. But accusing skeptics of arguing "it's not art of it's not paper" is a complete strawman. The philosophy of what "is or isn't art" is too subjective to be of any value. What people are really asking is "is this YOUR creative work or someone/something else's", which is the biggest problem with crediting AI media.
@@abracadabra8432 it's exactly the same. If you think you can get amazing image just by doing some simple prompt then either you don't know what great art is or you haven't actually made good art with AI.
Let me tell you it's extremely hard to get a good image. Sometimes it's almost feels like drawing by hand is easier.
Most people who comment on AI art generation is easy, haven't actually made anything great with it
@@musicandhappinessbyjo795 I love that responses from people like you are always a variant of "you just don't understand the tech", "you've never used it", or "you've never made anything great with it"
my guy I've used StableDiffusion for months to various degrees for personal art: character concepts, backgrounds, and rendering my own sketches. You can ABSOLUTELY get stuff that's polished enough for the layperson with minimal effort or planning, and when I do I'm under no delusion that I "made" the image myself. I commissioned images from my downloaded models, curated them and did some minor cleanup on the ones I liked. Equating that to the creative process without AI is just plain insane.
And even for the pictures where I do plan out the whole composition, it's just a matter of tweaking the denoize values, rerolling parts of the image and upscaling. I'd never pass it off the generation as my own work unless I used it as a base for painting over, or if it was extensively trained on my preexisting art. And even then, so much of the minor details are the product of RNG that it would feel like telling someone I "painted" a collage of someone else's assets. I'm not in the habit of taking credit for work I didn't actually do.
Wonderful! 👍
how much time it took to made the video? the 90 second one?
two people about a week
Really?@@albertbozesan
This is precisely why the big studios will never give in on the strike demands around AI. If they do it will allow smaller and foreign studios to undercut and ultimately destroy them
The studios gave in to the writer’s AI demands - the deal looks fair.
I feel like AI will allow content creation so easily there will be an overflow and surplus of entertainment. Because of this I think people will only bother to consume content from sources they trust, meaning it will become harder and harder for small creators.
We already have a massive surplus of entertainment - despite our criticisms the algorithms are working hard and decently well to show us only the best.
Love your attitude and thoughts on the matter. There is no stopping this tech so its best to position yourself as an early adopter and enhance your work
These kind of videos are so useful
Thanks for a thoughtful video. At around 7:18 you say, ".. if it stays in the right hands..". I am not an artist or a writer, so may I not use those tools?
Artists and storytellers, not necessarily writers. What do you see yourself as?
Thank you for your thoughts. The primary concern we should have is when financial power tries to limit competition. Humanity would be nowhere without people using other people's work as inspiration and ai is just the same but just way faster. Humans rely on good stories to stay sane and we desperately need good stories on how to proceed to make as many as possible "happy" and give our children a positive view on the future because anything else is really unimportant. In regard to ai, think about if you couldn't search for an artist name and see an image - copy it and experiment with collaging bits from that with other bits from other artists and then create your own. thing? Doing what others have done before us and changing small things here and there is the foundation of humanity and only monopolies want to capture that at a point in time and claim it is theirs all together. you have to change something to call it yours but you also have to realize that all human history before that made it possible. Artist should be careful not to become primadonnas that think they are doing something that they could have done in the stone age because most likely they couldn't have done it 5-10 years ago and don't forget all the artistic programmers involved and their sharing of all the tools.
I wholeheartedly agree.
The beginning segment where you showed the mainstream narrative, then you implied that is was misleading or wrong. But then later in the video you seem to agree with them? I'm a little confused why you included that.
I believe it is misleading and wrong. Reality is much more nuanced, as usual, and I was hoping to give an alternative perspective to artists - why we are valuable despite what people say about AI. Nonetheless, there are some issues we have to talk about. Just not as inflammatory as the press and others are doing.
WOAHHHH LETS GOOOO
AI, like any technology in human history, can be utilized for good and for bad... from the wheel to nuclear fusion. AI is no different in that regard. There are valid concerns about generative AI and its impact on careers and the economy, but it's been sad to witness the reactionary (and often times histrionic) rhetoric from the anti-AI crowd toward SMALL indie creators using these tools to maximize their creative output and quality to best match their creative vision.
This technology, for the first time in history, gives small creators and teams on a shoestring budget the capability to compete with huge studios in terms of quality and scale. IMO, the kneejerk reactions only serve to hurt the little guy in the end.
Excellent breakdown of why AI tools are something for creators to be excited about! And you also clearly explained why some artists are rightfully upset. I definitely think people should be compensated for use of their work in commercially-used AI training models. But if everything you bring to the table as a creator can be replicated by an AI then frankly you aren't a very good artist. AI is never going to replace human creators, just empower them.
It means nothing to be an actor nowadays, everybody can be on the screen , all you have to do is pull up you phone 🤳 and be seen by millions , it's meaningless, It doesn't have that GLAMOUR and LUXURIOUS UNTOUCHABLE dream it had in the past where a few selected ones were the "once upon the time" the Gods of the big screen.
To add insult to injuries your face now can be replaced with somebody else just for the sake of wanting to know what it would be like seeing an other actor playing in this particular film 🎥 which is and will catapult the film industry into a whole other realm of dystopia.
Well, just because you can be seen by millions doesn’t mean you’ll leave a lasting impression. Many actors got just one chance on the big screen, but then didn’t build careers, while others became world famous because of their sheer talent and clever positioning. Skill in storytelling remains essential.
I disagree with the sentiment that we should 'embrace AI'. AI cannot and should not produce art. Art is one of the most important aspects of life and it shouldn't be diluted with artificial and substance-less illustration. Not only will jobs be lost to AI but so will an aspect of humanity and all for what. Why? Why should art be 'easier'? Why remove the process from art? Why exist if we can be stripped of purpose by lines of code?
Depends if you are more enjoying the process of making art or achieving a result. Both are legitimate, the latter is usually more conducive to making a living as an artist, especially a filmmaker or game dev where many different kinds of art are necessary to finish the final product.
artists lol 😂😂 Hollywood has no artists writing
Dude, have you seen Sharknado?
Lets also not forget ChatGPT can't tell whole story. It's not meant to do so either. Stable Diffusion may make a generic mix of something cool, but will fails hilariously at taking a simple dumb picture of you and your friends. Its not consistant, not in my experience. So yeah, it's just one of many tools. But it's not, or is it meant to, replace humans in the loop. I bet anyone reading this: take something strangely niche like say Dirk the Daring from Dragons Lair, and ask Stable Diffusion to make a picture like that. it'll have hard time, a artist, human on the other hand could look, and with sometime me and them going back and forth come up with something with elements of if it into a new original thing.
GPT can actually create whole movie scripts. It needs proper Prompts and boom you have a full movie script