House of the Dragon: Alicent's 3rd Son Daeron Confirmed by Condal & Season 1 Deleted Scene
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 04. 2024
- #houseofthedragon #gameofthrones #targaryen
House of the Dragon: Alicent's 3rd Son Daeron Confirmed by Condal & Season 1 Deleted Scene - Zábava
Definitely a bad idea to scrap that bit of dialogue in season 1 - To anyone who doesn't know the books they would assume he was just concocted last minute out of whole cloth.
That’s exactly what people will say.
After another season of Greens killing women, he will come off as the Jaime of the Hightowers.
Should have had King Viserys ask about him when greeting Alicent at some point in season 1. Or even when they were having their last family dinner at peace.
"How's my son faring in Oldtown?"
"He's fine, now drink your milk of the poppy."
That's all they had to do.
That’s his son and that would be out of character, Viserys doesn’t care for his kids except Rhaenyra
@@mns2137 fixed, he cared at the end when he wanted them to all have dinner.
well he would never ask about it bc he doesn't remember or care about his children with alicent but yeah they shouldn't have cut the line
Daeron already appeared in the opening. They can't just forget about him.
This talk of set up in season 2 feels like something that should have been done already
Same with Halena's children.
@@Hero_Of_Old atleast we've seen them on screen already
Wouldn’t surprise me if Daeron gets a flashy entrance with Tessarion torching Black soldiers during a battle.
this would be so fkn dramatic for no reason. homie doesn't exist at all until he comes in to change the whole tide of the war. give me a BREAK. horrific writing
Don't know your actual name but I'll give you this , dragon , u don't put nonsense out into the world , and all the vids and content you put out is backed by lots of research and facts . I may not agree on some thing you've done in the past , but I do kno anything I get from this channel is usually either original /genuine and no nonsense. Makes you very reliable/dependable
“Cited research” - mindblowing
@thedragondemands5186, was this mean sarcastic or funny sarcastic ?
@@saraaberdeen12 funny - not you; but that other channels just report on their own theories without citation
Daeron The Daring > Rhaegar Targaryen
Save Aerys and Aegon IV all are better than Rhaegar, the guy is just memorable only due to the ruby ford.
@@quiquemarquez3211 You're 100% right I just hate that character so much.
They’re going to have a hard time telling the story if he never shows up on screen until 5 minutes before he becomes “spoilers”.
never read the books but with a little game theory you already spoiled it
@@cFull_Rtrd The high sparrow? Howland Reed? A horse?!
@@cFull_Rtrddont worry. Your first thought was wrong. But second is right
@@cFull_Rtrd
He:
A) becomes king
B) becomes landing
C) becomes King’s Landing?
This cut scene was a weak way to introduce Daeron in my opinion. A better way would have in episode 9. I could easily imagine Daeron being mentioned by Otto as an option for betrothal (he's Jace's age so it wouldn't be weird) and Alicent perhaps could be hesitant (she says "he's just a boy", Otto counters pointing out his age, and in the midst of this discussion we'd subtly get more details about him). This is a very rough idea but I think that introducing him in the context of power politics is better because it's more memorable, which is crucial if you only intend to introduce him in season 3. That being said, shoehorning the deleted scene into season 3 (Aemond and Gwayne) also works, though doing it in season one episode 9 would have been more impactful (which is also my way of saying that the green council scene needed to be a lot LONGER, Daeron or no).
Hope you're right, cause he's quite a cool and important character not to mention his beautiful blue dragon Tessarion. Maybe he will show up in the last episodes of S2 and surprise us, would be such a shame to cut him from the show as they did with Lady Stoneheart in GOT.
Just because they're slowing down the rate of adaptation doesn't mean they shouldn't introduce Daeron now. Personally I think it would be more beneficial to introduce him this season with a just a few scenes and then we can use him properly in season 3.
Ryan Condal confirmed his existence in the show in an EW article that was posted weeks ago. We just hope they start mentioning him in the second season.
I mean they introduced Joffery arguably a worthless character. But not Dearon its ridclous. Many show only watcher will be surprised anyway. And to be honest it's gonna be a disconnect between Dearon and the black side of the family anyway. Luke is dead and they had no scenes doubt he's gonna get any scenes whit the rest either. They lose that emotional impact, that this is a family conflict. They should have had him in the Family dinner scene, they just needed on episode for him to interact whit the whole family. 5-10minutes of screen time. it would have been logical to. Since Viserys is so close to death maybe Alicent would want all his children there to create a picture of family. A throwaway line that Otto had him sent from Oldtown to attend the dinner and say goodbye to Viserys done.
So we can get expanded roles for Baela and Rhaena, but Daeron doesn’t get to show up until 2026…
wouldn't synch up - Honeywine happens within two weeks of the Gullet
It’s ridiculous and I don’t get how anyone can defend this choice. If they don’t plan on showing him before S 3 they might as well cut him completely
@@thedragondemands5186 but at its crux, viewers have 4 years to see and connect with all of Rhaenyra/Daemon’s children - who are all arguably the “good guys”
And yet the only “good” Hightower is going to be introduced, and likely die in the span of 16 episodes?
Where he even without judgements of good and evil, would be a minor character compared to Rhaenyra, Alicent, Daemon, Aemond, and who knows what the do with Aegon’s injuries.
@@sunerys8511 why? He does not have a role until season 3.
@@LauraGS564neither does Rhaena or Baela, but the show will invent new subplots for them
You think they would mention him at least ! It will seem kinda weird to just have him pop up later !
As always TDD, I hope you're right.
Because I cannot imagine trying to explain Alicent's son to my casual viewer friends in S3 if things do not happen as you suspect.
lowkey pissed at ASOIAF fangroups im in recently because they keep insisting Nettles was 'cut' (as in cut from HOTD as a whole), and what's worse is that memes about Nettles being 'cut' spread like wildfire.
she is cut
Tomorrow’s the big day I have predicted George is going to announce the completion and release of Thw Winds of Winter during the full lunar eclipse!!!
SPOILER ALERT
I feel like they're gonna end up playing him off like a joke character.
"Have you ever wondered what it would be like to have a male child from Alicent that wasn't totally messed up? Well, you're in luck! Here's Daeron! He's real gallant and heroic and dashing aaaaand he's *GONE..."*
He wouldn't before Viserys dead but should have been in episodes six and seve, still I understand he is not relevant until the battle of the honeywine and that they had problems with how much could they fit in season 1, but I still think is a narrative problem to present out of nowhere a new son of Viserys after he is dead and in a diferent season, i think it would have been problematic if it was done in episode 9 of the past season, I think is problematic if it's done in the begining of season 2 and I think it will be really problematic if they wait to season 3, again I understand he is not important until season 3 but from a narrative perspective I still think is problematic he is not even mentioned, and if they don't know who to present the character or they don't know what to do with Aemond after Sir Criston takes the army, I fear they could give his role to Aemond, then have Aemond leave the green army when he is challenged by Daemon
Your channel exists solely to bridge glaring writing gaps in this defunct, meaningless show.
So Daeron gets introduced in Season 3 episode 1, and dies by the latest in Season 4 episode 8.
Shouldn’t even be in the show if that’s all he gets.
Him not being in the show would be worst , how would the reach plot happen without him and his dragon?
It wouldn't make sense
Oberyn Martell only had one season and yet he was properly introduced and mostly loved. I don’t know what y’all are fretting about. 😊
@@yayalim424 Oberyn only had his trial by combat, Daeron has multiple battles. Oberyns arc was mainly for him to die and make dorne fight the crown, Daerons plot is for him to be a commander for the 2nd portion of the green army. He needs more than 1-2 seasons or it will be rushed.
@@brayden8193 High Sparrow was introduced early season 5 and yet he was at the center of the game in Kingslanding. He temporarily took down 2 queens of 2 great houses. He was never mentioned in the previous seasons.
Daeron having an appearance this season is good but his arc will begin next season and I don’t think there’ll be a problem if he’ll be introduced then. Just wait and enjoy the show instead of stressing yourself over something you don’t have controls with.
@@yayalim424 the high sparrow was a side character who didn’t hold any importance until that short period of time. And even he had a rushed demise. Daeron is a prince and commander of an army. Im not stressing over it I’m just pointing out the bad planning💀.
I’m sorry but this is all smoke and mirrors.
They CANNOT introduce Daeron in Season 3, it would be wayy too late.
We don’t even know if the show is going 5 seasons, but even if it does, Daeron would be introduced in Season 3, and die by late season 4 at the LATEST.
If Daeron isn’t in season 2, he shouldn’t be in the show at all IMO. Unless the show actually stretches to 6 seasons.
Him not being in the show would be worst , how would the reach plot happen without him and his dragon?
It wouldn't make sense
@@tozy7208 they would just have more of the Reach soldiers join with the Kings Landing armies marching to the riverlands.
It wouldn’t be a major breach of canon for them to just say:
All the Reach sided with the Greens and they all marched north to help fight in the riverlands.
Daeron's plot in the FiB is short anyway. As much as many fans don't want to admit it, Daron is not an important character to the story.
@@cichy45Well he is important enough to show us all the chaos in the Reach, that's the same as saying Arianne Martell isn't key to the dornish plot in the main series.
@@DanLanningPRTeam the first battle in reach was almost lost to blacks
With daeron the greens wouldn't be able to March even out of old Town, how is cutting him making sense?
Creators are so dumb they just “kind of forgot about daeron”. Too focused on making Team Black look good and Team Green look bad that they can’t allow any good characters to exist on the “bad” side that might make people question if the characters on the “good” side are even that good.
God you people pretending there's some bias for team black when most of the changes in the show favor the Greens is annoying, also daeron isn't even that good remember tumblton? He's just the best out of the Greens which isn't saying much .
@@thatoneblackdude3333favours them all ma guy
@@khotunkhan3950 ? What does that mean ? The show changes favor the greens more then the blacks.
@@thatoneblackdude3333 says who equal amount of changes for blacks and green
@@khotunkhan3950 not really many black scenes were deleted there aren't many changes for the black and the ones that do exist aren't in there favor