I find a low shelf cut around 1k takes care of the 350-800 mud but keeps the vocal sounding natural and naturally gives a top end shine without boosting much. I've found that all the modern tools make vocals sounds lifeless and boring (sooth, dynamic EQ, reso etc). A lot of advanced techniques we see on tutorials are only good in extreme circumstances to save a turd, but actually take us further away from a good mix where knowledgeable use of the basics really yelds the best results.
your videos are by far the most useful on this platform .. I work since decades in this industry and you just bring all the the point. extrem advantage for people who just start out ..
I see that you took down my post about low mid high frequency buss vocals and stereo imaging for how implemented. Its a must and none of you show the reality of this situation which is how real engineers mix why isnt this been shown it must me you dont wnat to or dont know how to facts why isnt this shown to the public 🤔 it taught in music schools you have all the gear you want there no other way.
The dynamic eq settings sound so much better to me
I find a low shelf cut around 1k takes care of the 350-800 mud but keeps the vocal sounding natural and naturally gives a top end shine without boosting much. I've found that all the modern tools make vocals sounds lifeless and boring (sooth, dynamic EQ, reso etc). A lot of advanced techniques we see on tutorials are only good in extreme circumstances to save a turd, but actually take us further away from a good mix where knowledgeable use of the basics really yelds the best results.
I will try this out
Thanks for the tip! very good
your videos are by far the most useful on this platform .. I work since decades in this industry and you just bring all the the point.
extrem advantage for people who just start out ..
No fries no beans no macaroni
💀
Really nice video 👍 every beginning sound engineer should watch this. Thank you
you just helped me repair a song that I thought I would have to do all over, good looking big dawg!!!
That’s nice to hear!
That 2.5k always fucks me up
350hz and 2k are most frequenly problematic regions, i used to deal with dinamic eq's, so i can control more those frequencies!
Thanks King for the course. You should provide a .pdf document of your courses to includes in your perks. Would be nice 👍🏻
That 2.5k have ruing my vocal and mixes for year never could cunderstand what was calling my vocal to sound like a robot and harsh thanks
Great trick! Thanks! I also learned a couple INSANE tricks recently from Nick Mavromatis episode on vocal production. It’ll be worth your time.
I'll check it out!
Wish you showed the vocal with all frequencies sorted out
Nice to have u back!!! 2 Pro bro
2k frequencies really ven't mastered them.
800 is a magical frequency if you know what good is
Thanks man! Always great explenations, keep up the good work!
Would you use a broad eq for all three of the frequencies? Wouldn’t that basically be the whole mid region
I hate 2300-3700 range, it's really difficult to nail this region in vocals usually
Me too
Always clean ! Regards !
Great job as always
Gracias
Very useful! Bravo!
My god that song is hilarious!
😂
Bless
3.5k harsh is going to be noticed first!
hey bro, is the studio one stock EQ clean? No color added on it to subtract vocals?
Which 3 way monitors and sub are tou using in your small studio?
I see that you took down my post about low mid high frequency buss vocals and stereo imaging for how implemented.
Its a must and none of you show the reality of this situation which is how real engineers mix why isnt this been shown it must me you dont wnat to or dont know how to facts why isnt this shown to the public 🤔 it taught in music schools you have all the gear you want there no other way.
What mic did you use to record the vocals?
4k sometimes 4.5k
How is your unprocessed vocal so clean jesus
10-11k are annoying frequencies , then 3-5 k
potatoes fries maccaroni
800hz is great. Definitely not cutting it.