Battle of Orsha, 1514 ⚔️ Russian army bested by the stubborn Hussars ⚔️ DOCUMENTARY
Vložit
- čas přidán 2. 12. 2022
- 🚩 History Hit are running a very special offer. Use code BLACKFRIDAY to get 50% off your first 6 months - access.historyhit.com/checkou...
🚩 The Battle of Orsha was one of the biggest battles in 16th century Europe. It was the culmination of a conflict between the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Grand Duchy of Moscow
🚩 Consider supporting our work on Patreon and enjoy early access ad-free videos for as little as $1: / historymarche
🚩 This video was produced in collaboration with Srpske Bitke. Check out their channel: / @srpskebitke
📢 Narrated by David McCallion
🎵 Music:
EpidemicSound
#documentary #poland #russia
🚩 History Hit are running a very special offer. Use code BLACKFRIDAY to get 50% off your first 6 months - access.historyhit.com/checkout/subscribe/purchase?code=blackfriday&plan=monthly
I have a question, how early are videos watchable if we donate?
@HistoryMarche one remark.
those territories became "russian-speaking" only after been occupied by muscovites.
do not spread russian propaganda about "collecting lost russian lands", thanks!
edit for you : Battle of Vrša (official Belarusian Latinka ) , 1514 ⚔ Muscovite army bested by the stubborn Hussars ⚔ DOCUMENTARY
PLEASE MENIN AND POZARSKI 😎
It's not "Russian army".
Rus (Kyiv, Volyn)+Lithuania/partly Polish support - defeated Muscovites.
And there were heavy knights mostly, not hussars.
The major force of the Rus-Lithuanian army was Volyn knightshood of Duke and Hetman Konstantine Ostrožski.
Westerners are so freaking clueless, damn.
He ordered his cavalry to cross an entire battle front , through arrow fire, to attack a group on the opposite side of his deployment.
A Total War move if ever i've seen one!
Arrow fire???
I think that's called the "left flank shuttle"
@@the_bottle_imp You know what he meant you troglodyte
@@the_bottle_imp Russians were using flame arrows
Those were hussars in their plate armor, those arrows did very little to them. That armor could withstand direct hit from musket. I've read once in the old history book, printed in 1863 an account of one hussar been hit directly in front of his armor with musket bullet, the bullet bounced off killing his horse, but he went unscathed. And about Polish casualties, only comrades were counted, not the pleb's soldiers and it's very probable that only 500 were killed. Like in Battle of Kirholm where 3000 Poles clashed with 12000 Swedes, Poles got 100 dead and 200 wounded, Swedes lost circa 5000-8000 men and almost got their king killed.
Never thought that I would ever see a documentary about this battle on a major CZcams history channel, I got to admit, I have almost teared up. A big thank you from a Belarusian here.
Ukrainian is here as well)
Greetings from Poland Bro
@@ruslandukhnovskiy5694 Bulgarian as well
Litvin lines up
We've all lived under the threat from the east, since the Golden Horde all the way to Putins Russia now
The Polish - Lithuanian Army formed in its classic formatiom , The Old Polish Order ! In the year 1514 ! Im so proud to be Polish .
Me too.
And me!
А горжусь что литовец которы брат полякам.
This victory was almost exclusivelly done by Lithuanians and Ruthenians. Polish king sent 500 men that were not even from PLC
@@PaulDuchy-wl9lx "Meanwhile, Sigismund the Old gathered some 35,000 troops, most of whom (57%) were Poles,[7] for war with his eastern neighbor. His army was inferior in numbers, but consisted mostly of well-trained cavalry."
An interesting fact: one of the engineers who made a significant contribution to the construction of bridges was named Jan Baszta, he came from a small town of Żywiec.
Good to know! Thanks, I am personally from Zywiec... I had no idea
@@ThePawcios Pozdrawiam krajana ;)
@@ThePawcios For facilitating this crossing, the king rewarded him with a privilege of December 22, 1514, exempting him from duty levied on the Vistula on rafts with wood.
Ten co ten most spieprzył 😉
@@johndalton3781 nieee on go właśnie naprawił :D
Its worth noting that at this time the Polish and Lithuanian hussars were light cavalry, only being converted to heavy after the reforms of Stefan Batory in the 1570's. At this time the heavy cavalry were lancers largely indistinguishable from French Gendarmes and the like (the real difference being less companies used armoured horses and so called Gothic armour remained popular for longer).
Exactly!
(Edit: or perhaps not so exactly. It's complicated. See the comments by Kamil Szadkowski below for more nuance).
I big "oofed" when I say the thumbnail. That's seems very dishonest.
@@Velkan1396 it's ok they were Hussars there
@@khal7702 those are winged hussars, not the hussars that we would hace seen st Orsha.
Yes, from 1502 to 1570's Hussars were the light cavalry
Russians: It's over Hussars, we have you surrounded
Polish Hussars: All we're surronded by is fear and dead men!
MENIN AND POZHARSKY : 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@imperatorisamoderzhetsvser2564 who ?
@@chlopakzpolski Minin and Pozharsky are liberators of Moscow
Pozharsky is @@Baron_Scarpia so what they have in common with Orsza Battle ?
It's over, Russians. We have high ground!
The polish Lithuanian commander took a page out of Alexander’s playbook at the battle of the Hydaspes. A well executed deceptive maneuver to cross the river.
Tactic knowladge of Comonwealth comanders was really impressive. Special in maneuver, logistic wich was use in attacks or making traps as a "wagenburg"
The PLC commander's operational maneuver was excellent. I think the Russian commander handled the battle on tactical level excellently. the way he pried apart the PLC position with maneuver was well conducted. The PLC commander also handled things very well on a tactical level. the Shifting of the heavy cav to the right was crucial in saving the PLC army. the fight back once the Russians started giving ground was also very well done. ultimately it came down to the PLC's troops stubborn resolve but it easily could have gone the other way.
@@seanmac1793 Their stubborn resolves plus the polish Lithuanian commander had a tactical response to every Russian maneuver.
@abdoulo7737 for a while, but by the time the Russians attacked in the center, the PLC force without reserve, understandably so. It was really just down to sheer grit that the Center didn't break
Polish-Lithuanian commander who was the the grand hetman of Lithuania and an Orthodox Ruthenian.
Extremely interesting as always. And congratulate you a beautiful pronunciation of difficult Slavic names. Very rare.
to hear how it's actually pronounced - Orsha - you need to hear Poles
@@batorybogdan3310 I understand that very well. But you have to give "HistoryMarche" a credit. If you live in English speaking country you know that very often they have problem with English language as well. Example: the word "Glacier" is pronounced three different ways. Not to mention historical and scientific terms. In one video the same narrator pronounced the word "Denisovan" two different ways.
Nobody gives a doo doo about my real name (it's different). They twist it so bad it's atrocious. And I don't care. But when you deal with one of the hardest languages you can find it's different story. BTW. That's why Polish is way more descriptive than English.
To me they did really good job.
But when comes to the Magyar's names, the level will become more deadly 💀
@@khaiophirgrad7717 You are absolutely right. Polish language is just one of the hardest but there are much harder than that.
@@stanpski5442 I not think Polish is hard
The history videos you make are amazing. So so much better than any detailed long documentaries that are not even available for free.
Indeed 👏👏👏👏👏
I agree, definitely better than other history channels (king's and generals)
These videos are historically very inaccurate. They should be treated more like letsplays from Total War than descriptions of real events.
@@oleksandr2234 lol
@@oleksandr2234 how so? saying a statement like that with no evidence to back it up.....?
As a Lithuanian i am so excited of this stories! Thank you! So proud of your work and keep going!
@@ic8647 da Litovci ne Zemait. I tichat vatnik
@@ic8647 Pasol ti znaes gde
@@ic8647 195 countrys think that lithuania is lithuania 1 country thinks that belarus is lithuania
@@SuperPubas to be fair not all modern day Lithuania is Lithuania proper, Northern Belarus was also historically Litwa (Lida, Ashmiany, Navahradak and so on) and Zemaity is in modern day Lithuania. But to even talk about GDL in a context of nations that came to life after partitions is kinda stupid. We still don't know for sure who Mindoug was ethnically, still don't know where his first capital was etc.
It's our common history
@@SuperPubas Masz rację , historyczna Litwa to dzisiejsza Białoruś zaś współczesna Litwa to dawniejsza Żmudz
Thanks for this one! Cheers from land of Hussars!
My Polish ancestors were Winged Hussars at Vienna 1683. My father has one of their szabla (saber). I reenact a WH. The thing to remember is their Kopia's ( lances) were 14-18 feet long. Way longer than pikeman's pike. Hussars were armed with 3 swords, 2 pistols, war hammer or axe, dagger, and some even had bows. When the kopias broke. They would transition to the Koncerz. Which is a long 4 edged straight thrusting sword. The last sword was the Palasz. This was a 5 lbs hacking broadsword. These 2 weapons were in scabbards running along the side of the saddle, under the legs of the hussars. These 3 weapons were to enable the hussar to fight his way back through the enemy line to reack his retainer with replacement kopias. They were armed to the teeth. Their armor was proof tested against firearms. They wore a predatory animal pelt (cheetah, tiger etc) to unnerve opposing cavalry horses. Even the pennant at the end of the kopia was to distract the opposing horse.
Nice I have hussar ancestors to
Ukrainians were not hussars
@@Matan93 he said “My polish ancestors”. It’s literally the first three words in his comment, you illiterate dope.
and you use "pravi sektor" = nazi symbols and ukies have never been husars, you are fake.
@@Matan93 "My Polish ancestors..."
What a masterfully played battle given the conditions! Crossing river, ruse, man disadvantage, long march toward enemy position, enemy choose ground but was still surprised. Minimal losses. Perfect result. Decisive victiory.
Hussars is bad ass ! I love hearing about Hussars.
I forgot to add, the Battle of Kircholm 1605 deserves similar attention, it is also the "away performances" of the Polish hussars. This battle is, by the way, still taught at West Point today as the art of battle tactics
"The descendants of the century will be more surprised at this victory than they will believe it" - Jakub Sobieski, father of Jan III Sobieski, later the king of Poland, victor of Vienna in 1683.
You meant Polish Lithuanian hussars...
there is a video about Battle of Kircholm on this very channel, uploaded not too long ago
@@sergeithe9936 Yes, the author of the video blog has already instructed me. Thanks for the info. Regards
Battle of Kircholm is an absolute classic! It teaches you how the small force can almost obliterate huge, entire army. I said almost, because the opposite force was broken, but not finished. There was no glory in that. That was left to pleb's peasants, who finished off the rest of the Swedes!
@@kestutissamogitian1899 He meant that and west Russians. There were also Scots, Dutch, Czech, Hungarian, Germanic tribes and who knows who else. They were in mostly of support for Hussars, although playing important role as well!
Thanks for PLC history. It is not very heavily explored in English speaking internet and it's good that you are changing that. Great job!
Далеко не только польская история
@@villiamkost5095he said PLC not Poland. It stands for Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth.
@@notsoeloquent familiarize yourself with the full name of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania. The full name was as follows: Grand Duchy of Lithuania, Rus (that's what the lands of modern Ukraine were called, it has nothing to do with modern Russians) and Zhemantiy. Therefore, if we talk about percentages, in the Commonwealth of Nations, Polish lands accounted for about 45-50%, Ukrainian 35-40%, and then all the rest.
@@villiamkost5095 we already know all that. Therefore, PLC is not just Polish history by definition, but history of Poland, Lithuania, Belarus and Ukraine.
They ALL spoke polish. Poles gave them culture, language, influences and with time became united on every issue. Todays Lithuania, belarus, Ukraine have nothing to do wtih the glorious past really... Just the Stalins creations. Face the truth!
@@notsoeloquent
Perfect video for me today! :D
Currently playing Poland in a boardgame of Europa Universalis! Its been rough but I've vassalized Lithuania, annexed Prussia and smashed a Swedish occupation of Livonia! 💪😎💪
Lol
I'm always amazed by the numbers of cavalry involved in eatern Europe battles
The distances in the Eastern Europe are nothing comparable to these in the West. Too infantry heavy army in Eastern European Theater up till late 1700s would be simply outmaneouvered and starved to death by scortched earth tactics.
I got the same feeling about this. One of my own think why was that is eastern frontier of Polish Lithuanian Commonwelth was lack of rocks and others rescources to build much more castles and towns with walls in compare to west and south-west side.
@@piotrglogowski4000 brick castles can be built without stone. And in the age of gunpowder combined wood and earth fortifications were just as good as a stone wall, if not better.
Look the terrain. That's why some countries need a lot of tanks nowadays.
I am always amazed how powerful hussars were. And even more amazed that back in the history my oryginie country was doing something properly.
Regarding many comments and video description: this was NOT a battle of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. Back then, Poland and Lithuania were two independent states under one king/Grand Duke(Sigismund I the Old at the time of battle). PLC was formally brought to life by his son Sigismund II Augustus in 1569. It's like calling England under Henry VIII the UK.
The king ruled Lithuania as well as Poland. However, the Union was connected with the person of the monarch Sigismund I the Old.
@@arturceberek555 formally, only Poland was a kingdom. Yes, Lithuania was ruled by a king since the time of Jagiellon dynasty(courtesy of them being kings of Poland), but a formal title of a ruler of Lithuania was Grand Duke. It remained even in a full formal title of rulers of Commonwealth (King of Poland, Grand Duke of Lithuania etc etc).
@@africacorpse8010 anyway it was a great union
At that time Kingdom of Poland and Grand Duchy of Lithuania were not connected by personal but DYNASTIC union. GDoL had a right to elect its own Grand Duke who not necessarily was a king of Poland.
bullshit. military , political and economic integration was on the run fot 1oo years. Lithuania would never able to wage any war without the crown army.full union took place about 50 years later
Witam :) Jestem pod wrazem wierności przekazania historycznych wydarzeń . Pozdrawiam i gratuluje .
The Battle of Orsha was a battle fought on 8 September 1514, a VICTORY of the allied forces of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Ruthenia and the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland (with an army of 30,000) over the Grand Duchy of Moscow (with an army of 80,000). The war between the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Ruthenia and the Grand Duchy of Moscow lasted until 1522.
1st Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1368-1372)
2nd Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1487-1494)
3rd Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1500-1503)
4th Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1507-1508)
5th Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1512-1522)
6th Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1534-1537) ...
In 1395, Grand Duke Vytautas of Lithuania took Smolens'k and installed his governor there.
in 1514, the Grand Principality of Moscow under Vasili III captured Smolens'k.
Final result of Lithuanian-Muscovite War (1512-1522) was Smolens'k under Muscovite rule.
The number of troops seems to have been exaggerated
Taking Polotsk was in 40000 men. From ALL the Muscovy! Where from you got 80000?! Then a polish 30000 are counted in camp servants?
@@AlexMSQ The Russian army was more territorial defense than a professional army. A hussar was a member of a class of light cavalry, originating in medieval Hungary, under Matthias Corvinus, with mainly Serb warriors.
@@tomislavpetrov1179 Russian army was an ordinary knight army. Except of european knights were charging lancers, but russian knights were persian sepāh with bow and arrow.
Also russian cannon yard рфв the same power as french or Emperor's
Polish hussars at 16 ct. were the copy of Gendarmes of Francis I, but maybe more powerful as heavy charging cavalry.
Later, for 150 years, no one was equal to the Polish cavalry
Thank you for covering a battle I had never heard of before! Great work as usual. Keep it up!
The entire time of XV-XVII centuries in this region is planted heavily with battles like this one or even bigger and more prominent.
Важлива битва в українській історії , черговий раз дали пи@ди москалям 😅
One of the more intense videos you've done, nice work
I can tell by the music at the beggining that Hannibal is in charge of this army, I'm excited to see how he handles 16th century forces!
Sabaton is waiting to enter the chat…. But then…. THE WINGED HUSSARS ARRIVED
Fun fact: in this period the hussar formations just started to appear in the Polish-Lithuanian armies, looked quite different from their future iconic "winged" selfs, and were light cavalry; playing supporting role to the main shock force of that time - the heavy lancers in full plate (including horse armor). Also, these early hussars had shields. Look up the painting Battle of Orsha for reference.
Sabaton suck
@@TheMrcassina No, they dont
@@TheMrcassina shut up herectic! Sabaton are the better! ✌
We all knew that sooner or late someone had to say this lmao
Sorry, HistoryMarche - but you're wrong. Russians couldn't have 60 or 50 thousands of troops in early 16 century, as well as Lithuanians.
Tsar Ivan 4th the Terrible only after military reforms near 1550 finally summooned 50 thousandands for taking Kasan - moskovite feudals ("pomeschiki"), kossacks, tatars and streltsy (russian musketeers). In early 16th russian rulers (Vasilii III) had 20-30 thousands in ALL armies, east and west parts of their country. Battle of Orsha was big and great - but had less troops on the battlefield.
These are the findings of historical research - also Russian and Belarusian.
It is known that the Muscovite commander Челяднин promised himself that after winning the battle, he would occupy the entire Grand Duchy of Lithuania - and therefore he must have had considerable strength. Finally he died in a prison in Vilnius...
@@cetus4449 Historical studies on this topic put the number at 12 thousand. This is really not the “invading army” of the Mongols, however, at Agincourt, the army of Henry 6 had 6 thousand people. Let me remind you that Henry 6 was going to conquer all of France
Thank you and appreciate the historical background which put the battle in context.
Nice to see a video on a battle from the Muscovite-Lithuanian Wars. They really don't get much attention. Wouldn't mind seeing more documentaries on them. Say for example the Battle of Vedrosha, 1500
Muscovite Polish wars .Without polish crown Lithuania woud not exist long as a independent dutchy
@@pawelchmielewski1 I'd say it was fought by the Commonwealth. Even if it wasn't Commonwealth.
Polish crown is another ''discussion''. But yeah, they are known as Muscovite-Lithuanian Wars. Whatever.
Wikipedia states, _''The Battle of Orsha ... was a battle fought on 8 September 1514, between the allied forces of the _*_Grand Duchy of Lithuania and the Crown of the Kingdom of Poland, under the command of Lithuanian_*_ Grand Hetman Konstanty Ostrogski ... The Battle of Orsha was part of a long series of _*_Muscovite-Lithuanian Wars_*_ conducted by Muscovite rulers striving to gather all the former Kievan Rus' lands under their rule.''_
To be correct there were Polish-Lithuanian Wars not only Lithuanian
The poles barely even helped, they didn't care much for such a ''far away'' war. @@pawelchmielewski1
Great work! Please keep up the videos. They are one of the small things that brings me enjoyment.
Thank you for this!
It is great that you differentiate Ruthenian and Russian people
"Ruthenia" is an exoethnonym used to designate the inhabitants of the occupied territories in western Rus'. Fortunately, justice prevailed and they were able to unite with their brothers in the northeast, who called themselves Russians in the Byzantine manner. Since then, exonym "ruthenia" has sunk into oblivion as a dark and powerless past.
@@Shab_Kom different languages, different cultures. There were no Russians. Peter decided to take this Greek name for Moskovia. And habitants of Rus aren’t Russians they are Rusyns. Later in 19 century when all nations appears they were rebrended to Ukrainians because centre of wide moving to south-east from original Rus lands (Kyiv, Pereyaslav and Chernihiv).
@@dimadubnevych9164 You are pointlessly ignoring thesis of my comment. I won't repeat myself. Although I did not argue with the fact that Rusyns are also an endo-ethnonym. Look at your first comment: "It is great that you differentiate Ruthenian and Russian people". This is complete nonsense, read the Wikipedia articles about the Eastern Slavs, and especially about the exonym “ruthenia”, endoethnonyms: “Russians”, “Rusyns”.
@@Shab_Kom But they are simply not. Because Russians has never ever named Rusyns neither by themselves neither by their neighbors. And Rusysns have never ever called Russians. Russian is an adjective. In slav language it is not they way ethnic groups are named. Rus, Wes, Muroma, Lytva (noun of female ). And single person is ended with yn. Rusyn, Mordvyn, Lytvyn etc. Russian has never been Rusyns. Further more even those who are named Rusyns like Ukrainian and Transcarpathian Rusyns are considered to be different nations. And in general all this staff around Rus is a littble bit artificial because Rus was simply a conglomeration of different slav and finn tribes united by normans and trade route. And it collapsed when the main source of it power (trading with Byzantiya) were interrupted by Crusaders who destroyed Constantinopol.
Interesting battle. The poles sure were good fighters in this period.
Oh yeah, PLC army was known throughout Europe during this period. No one wanted to mess with them.
@@HistoryMarche Tatars did regularly. Muskovites, too. Both with a success.
@@sobolzeev No ..Muskovites were wooped like little bitches xD ...Tatars win if they ...win only by enormous unit advantage.... besides they attack like Vikings ...cowardly on unguarded villages town ..mostly killing civilians if Poles have Castles equipment and numbers .... they totally rape any enemy they have in front of them. Swedes have even an contract that if Hussars enter the battle they have a right to fled from field :)
@@sobolzeev Well, if you call border raids a success then yeah, sure. But many years had to pass after Orsha for Muscovy and Tatars to win an actual war against PLC. Even then it had to be weakened i.e. during Swedish "Deluge". Power balance fluctuated.
@MrSagaTeller Loss of Smolensk and Seversk lands, as well as Pleskov and Novgorod, can be well counted as such a success. Loss of Polotsk in 1563 was a brink of catastrophe for Lita, and required scales of Stefan Bathory reforms. You may consider it still profitable for the Crown, which encroached Rus lands south of Pripec River in 1569. However, it was the inner policy on these lands that sparkled the civil war which have ruined the PLC.
I know that many already asked you BUT when you think you can do the rest of Hannibal's story? You've done such a detailed work, with so many infos (obviously there is nothing left out) that pulled me from ep.1 and cant wait for more. Ofc, we must say that war is horrible thing... Learning about so many bloody battles, with tens of thousands dying on a single day, makes you realize the dread nature of humans! I study war history in general and im really shocked on how much evil humans are capable of, either out of personal ego, greed, hollow ambition, etc.
Same. I hope the rest of Hannibal's story is in production.
One of the best channels on CZcams
Bravo Zulu HistoryMarche
Wonderful telling of complex and exciting history. Thanks.
That was so good :D Please do the Battle of Vienna!
I'm polish, i love history, but i hear about this battle first time, thanks HistoryMarche
może zacznij książki czytać, to jeden z największych polskich sukcesów
Ups.. To jednak się nie da, interesować historią tego okresu, a nie słyszeć o Orszy.
Opis bitwy poznałem z książki Dzieje oręża polskiego, Warszawa 1968. Ta staroć zawiera też kilka czarno białych fotografii obrazów olejnych. Ciekawe, nigdy nie próbowałem odnaleźć reprodukcji lepszej jakości...
@@teraz.tak.jutro.inaczej Faktycznie trudno nie było słyszeć o bitwie, która zatrzymała Moskiewską ekspansję na kilkadziesiąt lat.
Ale pierwszy raz widziałem jej przebieg.
Opis przebiegu bitwy mam dostępny z książki powyżej. Są tam także zamieszczone schematy sytuacyjne przebiegu bitwy. Wszystko jest mniej więcej zgodne z tym co zamieścili tutaj autorzy. Większy rozbieżności nie znalazłem.
Ale przeczytać, zobaczyć mapki, a zobaczyć animację to nie to samo. Autorzy wykonali tutaj kawał dobrej roboty.
Thanks HistoryMarche.
Napiszę to jeszcze raz otwartym tekstem, wystarczy wpisać w wyszukiwarkę, zakładka grafika "bitwa pod orszą obraz" aby wyszukać obraz olejny z początku XVI w. Autorstwo nieznane, ale sami zobaczcie.
Great video as always.
Very nice video! Thank you 🥳
great watch as always👍👍
Great job!
Thanks for your work!
The claim of 500 dead is not unrealistic considering that Hussars themselves have lost 4% of their forces in their worst cases. The loses in horses though, were sometimes reaching even 50%.
Oh my, yes. Thank you for this.
Your work never disappoints!
This was quite awesome. Great stuff
Thanks for sharing this knowledge! I am from Poland and didn't know that, shame on me. Lucky we got You!
Please remember that hussars werent winged yet. At this time they were Also rather light cavlry
very true, but can't blame people about being excited about Winged Hussars
Eh, they always were and weren't winged. It is a complicated topic, suffice it to say hussars as shown in pop culture never really existed.
@@kamilszadkowski8864 it is not complicated. In 1514 they were not winged. They become winged around 1560 or something
But our heavy cavalry was the most armored at that time, just look at the pictures from the era, I recommend the battle of Orsha. The hussars under the command of Radziwil were then light cavalry
@@G0TIMAN Bullshit. Some early hussars had wings attached to their shields.
Love the back round sound n music, excellent!
Thank you! As for me, your channel now is Nr. 1 of Historical channels. Cuz Kings ang Generals are now сompromised.
Suggestion: something that might help is flashing some art near the start of each episode so we have an idea how each side was equipped. I only have a vague idea what "Polish light cavalry" would mean for this period. Nothing fancy as Osprey color plates, but anything to give a accurate visual idea of how each side was equipped.
In general, it would be nice if they at least tried to give some detail about the respective army compositions. Otherwise, the battle becomes very abstract for everyone who is not familiar with the military history of a given region.
Good point. There is a Renaissance painting brilliantly illustrating the battle, known as the "Battle of Orsha". The painting was created shortly after the battle according to the school of Lucas Cranach and today is in the collection of the National Museum in Warsaw, but its large reproductions can be found on the web.
It is very possible that the artist (Hans Krell?) was present in the battle himself - the picture has the true value of a reporter's account, full of details!
Tactics, appearance, weapons, course of events, etc. are precisely and realistically depicted.
What about a playlist with Polish and Lithuanian wars with Russia/Sweden/Turkey etc? Currently we see the Central Europe emerge as a significant player, which if everything goes right, could be understood as the rebirth of the Commonwealth but in different political system(s). A playlist like that would, ekhm, refer to nowadays challenges let's say.
@9/11 was done by bush Ottomans got swept by us Polish at Vienna, don't lie.
@9/11 was done by bush Ottoman is Turkish Empire you fool!
@@elliot4013 Ottoman Polish War 1672-1676
@@elliot4013 And later the Austrians have snached up a part of Poland...
@@diabelgrogaty1963 we were betrayed. Without us Polish the Austrians would have been crushed to dust, they were so near that fate.
Great job with putting this video together
Awesome as always
HM I wasn’t as big on your style as say kings and generals early on but after a couple years of watching the content you make, I’ve come to favor your stuff over the rest.
Maps in the kings and general battles are often inaccurate and battles are simplified. Instead of the units being shown as fleeing they are fully magically destroyed...
I personally from the start liked HistoryMarche the best because as you say they give way more detailed info, tempo is slower and more immersive and you can appreciate all parts of the battle. BazBattles is second best to me, too bad they post videos very rarely as of late.
Interesting material, I learned about it long time ago, but not in such details. Refreshing.
Great content!
great review of the battle
Relaxing.) We all know how the war between the Russians and the Poles ended,) the Partitions of Poland.)
Russians alone did nothing, they needed germans and austrians. With out their help there would be no partitions. So takie it easy boy, you dont know what waiting for russia in the future(nothing nice)
As others have said, the Hussars at the time were light cavalry, nothing alike the later winged hussars. The thumbnail could be quite missleading imo, I would replace it.
It's also interesting to point out that according to Tomas Baranauskas, the infantry on the polish side were the (or most of the) bohemian mercenaries, some 3000 men, both light and heavy.
There's a very nice painting of the battle that depicts equipment that could have been used by both infantry and cavalry, even if it dates around 1530-35, the style of the arms and armor looks the part.
In Poland and Lithuania Czech mercenaries were popular, because they were cheaper than German ones.
great video!
Very interesting! Ty!
Greetings from Stockholm 👍
Reminds me of Alexander the Great's battle of Hydaspes at first
Very likely comanders of Comonwealth had knowladge about that battle
@@bartoszbielecki1722 Yes because they read Alexander war dairy's it was a part of classic educations.
As always, spectacular video
Glad you enjoyed it
Brilliant work
Look a bit like battle at Cannae? 🤔 Love sooooo much your videos. Greetings from Croatia ✌️
Thank you very much.
Great video as always HM!
Awesome video! Makes me want to play more civ v!
I wish the videos were longer, I love these videos
Fantastic video! Really interesting tactics being used. Always love an underdog victory
Yes, the two commanders really showed their skill in this one
Thanks!
Thank you so much for the support. Very kind of you!
Best video thanks
Great visuals!
No wonder why Putin mentioned Poland more times than US in the interview with Tucker.
HIstoryMarche, there are videos I can't wait to watch such as:
Rise of Augustus Caesar (Part 6)
Prince Eugene of Savoy (episode 3)
Basil II, the Bulgar slayer (part 2)
First War of Scottish Independence, (Part 4)
Third Samnite War (Part 3)
Hannibal, Second Punic War (Part 19)
Excellent episode.
Please add in a mile/kilometer scale to the battle maps to gain more insight into the situation.
Thank you.
Thx for video
Poland defenders of Europe ! Good bless them..
Yes they make many times, against the mongol, against the ottoman together with the Hungarian. Europe had forgotten this? Big shame. Even the Big USA can be thankful about that. But they don't understand. Not even how theyr "country " was made. Who did make where you are today? I know, don't answer ( Europeans have make your country) and you still need them!!!
Byzantine empire laughing in the corner.
Polish liars of Europe)) They like to make a big deal out of a molehill. so it is with this battle
Russia is no less: 1237, 1480, many wars against ottomans, 1812, 1945
But do other Europeans remember this? In any case, their propaganda wants the opposite.
the best History Channel in the youtube ...
thank you for your efforts .. you the best
Very informative❤
Thanks for that! When 4K on the channel?
I need more videos. Please make more. Thank you
Holy shit is this thumbnail awesome 🤩
Thank you very much! I tried to experiment a little with artwork.
With this video, you just got a new suscriber, amazing one.
Welcome aboard
Fascinating stuff!
5:32 Shame you didn't show Dvina and Dnieper rivers to better visualize the importance of Smoleńsk and the Smoleńsk Gate. The land bridge of Smoleńsk Gate between Dvina nad Dnepr would be self-explanatory
This is great example how powerful is coordination between Ukrainians, Poles, Belarusians and Lithuanians.
Love your channel.
Ukrainian doesn’t exist in 17 century 😅😮
@@cya3mdirl158 As well as Russia 😮
Those are historical terms to describe people and realms in history.
@@sircatangry5864 not really. Ukraine is artificial country
@@cya3mdirl158 Ukranians have joke about this "artificiality" of their nation.
"Austrians tried to imagine ukranian language so hard, that they forgot to imagine Austrian"
@@sircatangry5864 I don’t remember any king of Ukraine but when we look at history Poland we can see about 30 kings
I love Poland !!!
Thanks
Classical battle from the Renaissance. The winning strategy was to confront the enemy army with the right armored, weapened and operating soldiers. Russian light cavalry attack on the right was countered by heavy cavalry, Russian light cavalry attack on the left was defended effective with pike and guns. The Russian centre was advancing too slow and late, surrounded and butchered. The account of the 500 death Poles seems right (without wounded).
Even though in comparison to other who has greater graphics than your channel many find including me your channel more easy to understand while other channels almost very confusing since thier map and sometimes presentation isnt straight to the battle that's what makes you unique HM u still have the KISS principle Keep It Simple Stupid which is a navy term when designing thier planes and also require to focus more the quality than the looks so Thank you HM for this easy to understand videos 🥰.
Great to have as usual an insight into that ignored by others who make historical documentaries.
I like that the scout had to correct you on the timeline that's some creative humorous correction.
Polish Hussars were the Elite of Army at that time, so I wouldn't question the 1:26 loss ratio. This battle could resemble, for example, a clash between US Marines and Iraqis during a Desert Storm operation ...
Yeah but Russia defeated the poles and america too scared to try Russia
@@Ultra_Ego_Putin soon Ukraine will defeat ruSSia - without involving the US.
@@Ultra_Ego_Putinwhen russia defeat USA? XD
@@habuger12 America scared to try the Russian army always got the biggest mouth pull up already
You made so many videos about Polish military history, which I am grateful of. But did you plan to make a series about the beginning of Kingdom of Poland? Great struggle between Mieszko I and Bolesław the Brave against German Emperors?
not german emperors, it was against 1st reich back then send by rome to chrystianize Slavic people...
@@oinkoink6092 Holy Roman Emperors to be precise
Great video
dzięki!