Fun deck but, man, I had no idea so many people play Legion to Ashes in Arena! Been playing this deck for a few hours now and I've now encountered more players playing that card tonight than ever before. It's amazing!
i converted the deck to explorer because i didn't want to afford the missing expensive lands. the thing is: i constantly have to play against blue or decks with blue, i win quite often, but rather rarely because of the copy function. what makes me win so often is „painful quandary“, the matchwinner par excellence
One suggestion I would make is to add a couple copies of cooped up because you can make a copy of it, then next turn pay 2w to exile the creature cooped up with the copy and then make another copy and you can loop making copies and exiling without having to worry about another being on the field.
I've had a lot of luck playing the weaver on turn two and casting naturalist into a 2-drop enchantment on turn three. It does a lot of work safeguarding your tempo against removal
Wow finally someone getting closer to my deck but the gruff triplets and calix are important for this deck to really come into it own. Calix copy's enchantments but needs to attack and deal damage. However when you have more than 1 of the same enchantment ...critical
ok WHAT is your luck spell or talisman or w/e LOL?!? 4 games, 3 yenna's, all of them survive to copy, and somehow at 26:05 you avoid a virtue killing her after you block and put her at 3 toughness! (I'm just salty - mine ALWAYS die.... always)
This deck is saddly unplayable on ranked, sure it can win some games here and there but it will suffer against all the popular decks as this is just an slower version of the enchantments deck and splashing black for quandary is kinda rough specially cause it limits the amount of basic lands for ossification.
In game 2 when you had 1 life you went thru all that at the end for him to scoop and all you had to do was play Hallowed Haunting and you would of had flying and vigilance and turn side ways and win. Then on the game VS the rats you play haunting then you play weave and you dont copy anything, why would you not play haunting then copy haunting then play weaver?? Sometimes i feel you are way too tunnel vision in the way you play and you miss out on just obvious plays. Then when you do copy you go to copy Oscification instead of the haunting, i just dont get some of your plays.
Does your phone have autocorrect? Yes? Did you understand what he means? Yes? Why split hairs over something that doesn’t make a difference? Let your brain autocorrect and continue on.
There are two types of infinite loops. One is an infinite combo. Another is an infinite loop. Infinite combos are one turn. A loop doesn't have the same time requirement. It just needs to recur endlessly
So crazy ! Thanks you for the deck from France 🇨🇵
Keep up the great work Swayze!
Fun deck but, man, I had no idea so many people play Legion to Ashes in Arena! Been playing this deck for a few hours now and I've now encountered more players playing that card tonight than ever before. It's amazing!
That's mtg arena for you
Great deck... I will try it, adding Mondrak & Calix.
GG Swayze!
Great deck!
i converted the deck to explorer because i didn't want to afford the missing expensive lands. the thing is: i constantly have to play against blue or decks with blue, i win quite often, but rather rarely because of the copy function. what makes me win so often is „painful quandary“, the matchwinner par excellence
Hallowed Haunting at 11/7 artifacts in top left corner - am I a joke to you? 😂
One suggestion I would make is to add a couple copies of cooped up because you can make a copy of it, then next turn pay 2w to exile the creature cooped up with the copy and then make another copy and you can loop making copies and exiling without having to worry about another being on the field.
Ive seen a few interesting decks using the beanstalk enchantment and arcane bombardment that i though would be cool for you to give a spin on
I've had a lot of luck playing the weaver on turn two and casting naturalist into a 2-drop enchantment on turn three. It does a lot of work safeguarding your tempo against removal
Wow finally someone getting closer to my deck but the gruff triplets and calix are important for this deck to really come into it own. Calix copy's enchantments but needs to attack and deal damage. However when you have more than 1 of the same enchantment ...critical
you should consider calix in the deck to add another possibility to copy de mice enchantment, thats how i have it set up. Its a very nice deck
I like the Quandary
12:06 don’t you just have lethal with the haunting giving everything flying and even if not they get vigilance
He is the master of missing lethal’s 😂
The dollmaker for alchemy also works well
I love Yenna
I did this in draft and felt the power.
I tried a Zur deck that makes enchantments into creatures, then you can start copying any of those enchantment creatures with Vesuvan Diplomacy
Honestly this deck is sick it probably doesnt need black
Mondrak.
ok WHAT is your luck spell or talisman or w/e LOL?!? 4 games, 3 yenna's, all of them survive to copy, and somehow at 26:05 you avoid a virtue killing her after you block and put her at 3 toughness! (I'm just salty - mine ALWAYS die.... always)
This deck is saddly unplayable on ranked, sure it can win some games here and there but it will suffer against all the popular decks as this is just an slower version of the enchantments deck and splashing black for quandary is kinda rough specially cause it limits the amount of basic lands for ossification.
I came for the quandary, you didn't play it, what gives?
Hard to play it when when you're busy running people over.
In game 2 when you had 1 life you went thru all that at the end for him to scoop and all you had to do was play Hallowed Haunting and you would of had flying and vigilance and turn side ways and win. Then on the game VS the rats you play haunting then you play weave and you dont copy anything, why would you not play haunting then copy haunting then play weaver?? Sometimes i feel you are way too tunnel vision in the way you play and you miss out on just obvious plays. Then when you do copy you go to copy Oscification instead of the haunting, i just dont get some of your plays.
Ты проиграл мне на скручивание 😂
An infinite loop means it goes infinite in a single turn.
Ex: Ob with All for one 1 point of DMG into death Aka Obnifinite
There's always that guy....
Does your phone have autocorrect? Yes?
Did you understand what he means? Yes? Why split hairs over something that doesn’t make a difference? Let your brain autocorrect and continue on.
@@chriswampler1 Wrong. People actually do searches for infinite loop combos in MTG. This is not an infinite loop combo. It's just a combo.
There are two types of infinite loops. One is an infinite combo. Another is an infinite loop. Infinite combos are one turn. A loop doesn't have the same time requirement. It just needs to recur endlessly