Whatever choice you have made, it's always the Mike Lane behind the camera that takes the picture. Experience and a long life of loving birds and nature, that makes the difference. It's not only the possibilities, it's how you use the possibilities.
I’m very happy with my OM1+300f4 (and the complete PRO line). I’m also a Nikon user but I almost never use Nikon anymore. My Wife continues to use Nikon. After more than 25 years as a professional Photographer I could not be happier with my equipment!
I switched from Nikon to Sony recently and the dust was insane. I had dust on my sensor the first day I got my a7riii. So that is amazing to hear about the om-1. Goodbye dust! I got the om-1 mostly for macro of insects so the increased dof is going to be HUGE for me as well. An excellent, well informed video my good sir!
The sensor dust on my A7iii was bad. Not sure what Sony did but I've been shooting with the A1 for 2 years and have had zero problems with sensor dust.
Great stuff Mike, I was confident all along you'd go back to Olympus. Regrettably I've flitted through camera systems and nothing has felt as good and inspiring as Olympus cameras to use. Their ergonomics as you say are superb, their pro series glass is stupidly sharp and I never had to clean the sensors. Also I loved how I was able to carry my 300mm f4 and a landscape lens in the bag, do a long hike and not feel the weight
The ultrasonic sensor cleaner in all Oly cameras are simply the very best in the industry. I have used numerous Oly digital cameras for the past 12 years and I have never ever cleaned any of their sensors, even after countless times of lens changing. My Panasonic G80 and Nikon D750 sensors needed to be cleaned a few times a year, even when I am ultra careful not to change the lenses in dusty environments.
Equipment aside... Mike, your channel is absolutely fantastic. I thought I was reasonably knowledgeable where fieldcraft goes, but you really know your stuff. Please, please keep it up. Although I am a professional photographer doing commercial and equine photography, my hobby is wildlife work. It keeps me sane and is so rewarding when you get the shot that you want. Thanks for all the effort that goes into these videos. Your channel is the only one have notifications on for!
Mike, not sure you have noticed. The Pro capture with CAF now works with Panasonic and Sigma lenses now. I am not sure whether all of them will work but I have tried many of them and they all seem to work. Just another advantage and that Panasonic Leica 200 F2.8 could be a special use case in some scenarios.
Nice. Great point on needing to shoot at f8 on a full frame. There are great values in additional depth of field, of which m43 is at an advantage. All else equal, you can shoot at 2 stops lower iso for the same DOF, which close in on the "quality" gap. Also, bokeh are the easy thing to adjust "fake" in post, especially with birds, where the background are often very non distinct. It would still be nice if OM can make for example, a 200mm f1.4, which will render in image like 400mm f2.8 on FF. Not far fetched I think, since they will only have to design around the much smaller image circle of m43. Meanwhile, I am still waiting for OM1 to be in stock.
An excellent real world discussion of how these two cameras worked in your hands. At the very end you brought up the OM-1's Pro Capture feature, and wondered why other manufacturers hadn't yet incorporated it on their cameras. A good part of the answer has to do with that 20 MP sensor that so many people (not you!) complain about. The data processing and temporary storage is 2.5 times greater on a 50 MP camera than on the OM-1. With that comes extra heat generation, which is already a major issue with image processors jammed withing the confines of a sealed camera body, perhaps requiring additional (noisy) cooling fans; higher costs for faster processors and bigger/faster RAM modules to handle the imaging workflow; and faster draining batteries which are called on for that processing. There are more than weight advantages in OM Systems keeping the size and pixel count low with their new camera line. I'm reminded of the words of Colin Chapman, the creator of Lotus sports cars: "simplify, then add lightness;" that magic formula doesn't just work for race cars.
I'm delighted that you chose the OM-1. I will be getting one myself and it won't be a huge loss to me for not getting the A1 because I can't afford it. LOL
2 years back I made the same brand decision: Sony vs. Olympus (by that time the OM1.3). And I agree, the AF was so superior (not the same ballpark by that time) - but the weight difference, the price and - of course - the PreCap mode plus the much better menu system (which improved further) made my decision. And - a lot like you - I was short to regretting because of all the bad news. But now I purchased finally the OM-1 and I am absolutely eager to starting using it.
Fantastic... the new Olympus - OM SYSTEM camera is a very good choice... 👌🏻👍🏻💪🏻 ; I will still continue with the fantastic Olympus OM-D E-M1X ... (besides , I'm sure they'll do some new Firmware update more fine-tuned for the E- M1X ...) 👌🏻👍🏻💪🏻💖💖 Greetings from Spain
I'm so sorry Mike that you have lost a lot of your fan-base (Sony ones)! The OM-1 is quite simply an astonishing camera and the OMDS AI modes, e.g. ProCapture, Focus stacking and Live Composite are features that most OMDS (or Olympus) haters do not want to talk about. I use them very often and they are simply game-changers for my photographic requirements. Thanks for a very impartial review.
One way to compare the two is financially. If I wished to have the OM-1 I'd be looking for US $2,000 for the camera. Whereas if I wanted a Sony A-1 I'd be needing $6,500 for the camera. The Olympus Zuiko lens would be $7,500. Whereas the Sony 200-600mm would cost $2,000. The two rigs are almost mirror images of each other! Only reversed.
I just made the same decision around two weeks ago, and I sold my Sony a1 and 200-600 with several GM lenses.One of the reasons of my decision,I didn’t like the IQ of 200-600mm.It wasn’t even close the 600mm GM quality.Unfortunately I had two brain surgeries last two years and It was really difficult to keep carrying the 600mm f4 all day long.With the help of a lady In Poland who works for a big photo shop,she arranged for me the OM-1 with 150-400 f4.5.I loved the lens at the moment I hold it in my hands.IQ of this lens not far from the Sony 600mm f4,it is much more versatile with 1000mm FF equivalent and I can use it handholding with shutter speeds I couldn’t dream it wit any FF cameras.My hit rate on BIF is not better than Sony a1,I don’t know what I am doing wrong, but I would like to get your help if you can share with me,which setting do you use for your BIF photography.If you can make a video for this it will be perfect.Anyway thanks for series of nice CZcams videos.
@@chiara1086 Thanks,I already watched it,still I don’t have the hit rates which I was abled with my Sony a1.I am very pleased with the optical quality of the 150-400 f4.5 but the BIF AF quality of the OM-1 still not good enough for me.I have the camera less than 3 weeks so I have to practice more and find the best settings for me.
@@victorfeinstein1815 Or maybe that 600GM is just that much faster in terms of AF. It is much faster than the 200-600G, which according to Mike works comparable to the Olympus combo.
After watching the rest of the video I see that you made a very intelligent and well-thought-out decision. Thanks for describing the different features and shortcomings of each camera setup. I currently have a Sony and an R6 and I really hope they will add that pro capture feature somehow in a firmware update.
Having had opportunities to borrow and shoot the Sony A9/A1 with 400/2.8 and 200-600 for the past couple years, along with my OM System cameras, I was of a mind similar to you, Mike, and once I got the OM-1, I was very surprised with how comfortable the handling is compared to previous OM System bodies I used as well as the Sony bodies. It is the most comfortable camera body I can recall every having the pleasure of using. My second body will arrive next week so that will be great to have a two body kit for wildlife and sports event work. I enjoyed your series very much and learned quite a lot from your many tips and experience you have. Much appreciated.
Great video content Mike. I’m just starting my birds in flight journey. Purchased the OM-1 and 75-300 and getting some good results but not consistent. Would love too see a video on your settings for BIF. Thanks for your time Mike.
I really enjoy your honest and down to earth videos and also appreciate the great results you always show. As an OM-1 owner I would like to say that if I were in your place, then I would for sure keep both the Sony A1 and the OMD OM1 - both are great tools in their own way.Expensive solution ? Yes but spending a minor fortune on a new camera only hurts once. Regarding Pro-capture: You are spot on, I simply don't understand why Nikon,Sony and Canon don't offer Pro-Capture for full Raw and neither does my good friend who use the Canon R5. He is very annoyed at Canon as he thinks an Olympus style Pro Capture mode on his Canon would make it almost perfect. I hope to visit merry old England (UK) one day for a 2 week birding trip (Kingfishers,Red kites, eagles etc.)
I can't imagine you'll be sorry you made this choice. I'm just envious, as I don't have either the OM-1, nor the wonderful 150-400mm. That said, I'm very happy with my E-M1X and 100-400mm. I went out a few days ago and got a great shot of a Great Blue Heron flying off with a huge perch he had just caught. You're right about Pro Capture too -- it's another Oly innovation that will eventually be in every high end camera.
Whilst the E-M1 II got Pro Capture in 2016 the Lumix G7 got pre-burst a year earlier and that was updated onto the GH4. Whilst most of the Lumix used hybrid 4K/6K for the job the G9 can pre-burst full sensor. 6K/4K is a movie mode, on the G9 6K goes 30fps and 4K 60fps or 30fps. Whilst the G9 cannot buffer as many frames as the OM1 that may be an advantage as you probably only get one money shot and bin the rest, the usual mode is the slower SH1-Pre to avoid filling the card with rubbish. You can end up waiting for buffering to store down before you can shoot again; best to switch back to single. Bird recognition on the G9 is good, tracking does work, but AFC may breathe a frame or two. The G9 does not flicker the EVF. The thing with the G9 + PL100-400 and the barking mad stabilisation is it becomes hand-held. And more accessible to the amateur budget.
apparently pro capture like feature was available in nikon 1 camera system. i dont know if this was the nikons innovation. Re-Introduction back into Z9 is very welcome, yet the Z9 cannot shoot in RAW as yet, like Olympus.
@@TL-xw6fh no - you are looking at the 6K pre burst. It will also pre-burst on SH1 and SH2 with full size raw+jpeg. Not as fast as the 6K/4K shooting at movie speeds maybe but certainly full resolution. Two slots on the dial for storing whatever your burst preferences are.
@@TL-xw6fh No actually not. The pre burst can go raw+jpeg full resolution. You are thinking of the 6K/4K pre-burst which can rock movie fps. Either you have not found it yet or you do not have a G9.
Great work again, Mike! The OM-1 must be a fantastic camera to make you switch. I'm sticking with my Sony A1 and 600mm f4, it's the best set-up I've ever used. I'm sure you'll get a quick sale on the Sony A1...brilliant camera for my birds in flight work. A real bonus is that it takes a 1.4x teleconverter beautifully. Barely no degradation in image quality and autofocus speed is still super fast. Looking forward to seeing more of your work with your new set-up.
I just sold my Nikon equipment and switched to "Olympus". And because I don`t have the patience to wait for the OM1, I bought an EM1 III for the meantime.
Great video Mike with all the fearures from both cameras covered thoroughly Your bird and wildlife videos put nature first and show the reality of what's needed to achieve the wonderful images you provide and that comes across always. I am pleased you have chosen the OM camera and hope their are more of your videos to come. Thank you.
👌👏👏👏How well explained. Thank you. For me weight is a deciding factor. It is a matter of taking care of the health of the back, joints, etc. In addition, the micro four thirds system, by using less volume of material for the construction of objectives, is even MORE ECOLOGICAL. Personally I would have made the same choice. I personally believe that most of the manufacturers of classic cameras and Sony (which bought Minolta) have known how to create in the consumer the need to keep the old 24x36mm format, but not to do photographers a favor, the favor is for the manufacturers themselves so that they can continue to take advantage of the old optical designs of the 35mm format...
Everything you say is my opinion. But I chose the E-M1X instead of the OM-1 first because it saved me $ 1,600 for the price I bought it for. Once you add the Battery grip and extra battery to the OM-1, something the EM1X has. The next thing that tipped the scales between the two cameras is the E-M1X wonderful automatic focus with the new bird update. Yes OM-1 is certainly better, but I come from the world of Canon where it's pretty bad. I use E-M1X in combination with 300mm F4 and sometimes 1.4MC and appreciate the lightness of this combination compared to my Canon lens which is twice as heavy. Finally, the OM-1 will be available at the end of June. I made the order in March and I am glad that I canceled it after the long wait. The E-M1X is all I need so far.
@@MikeLaneFRPS no probs was an interesting video. im an A1 user love it but also an rx10iv user which i also love. smaller sensors deffo have their benefits
Thank you Mike, you made a lot of very well reasoned and coherent points in this video. One consideration I have always had when thinking about camera gear is the fact that camera bodies generally get a much shorter production lifespan than the glass that they attach to and although lenses have all sorts of wonderful features these days, the quality of glass and construction of the lens elements stays as new for a lot longer than any camera body. Bodies and lenses come and go but I suspect that the OM-1 will have a much shorter life in production than the 150-400mm. What I am trying to say is that it is makes a lot more sense to put cash into lenses and change these a lot less than camera bodies which by their nature will/should get better at each relatively frequent update. For what it is worth, you have made an excellent choice I think.
And by this rationale, look at what Sony does. They put all their "money" (actually OUR money) into the A-1. The 200-600 lens is chicken feed by comparison. That said, I am still pissed off about OM System way of charging their bloody batteries!
Super video. Very clear and informative but with a nice dash of your understated humour. I've been following this series with great interest to see which you would finally choose. A nice choice to have to make. Look forward to your future films with the OM-1.
We have the same kingfisher statue at home, just with a slightly different foot... Interesting video - glad you were able to decide on one of these cameras - sometimes it's not easy to choose - the competition is high. But in the end there is always that one brand that fits best ;) - Best regards
The never ending Arms/Camera race! What will be the next leap frog de jour be? What counts for me is that someone shows how to go about taking beautiful pictures and video. The tips of learning bird behaviors and good composition are as important as photography technique. Thanks for providing all these in an integrated way.
I shoot the a1 with 600GM and 400 GM.I am convinced the Olympus lens is great quality and the system is compact is lower in weight.the only thought about the OM 1 I have is the sensor high iso performance.You can’t deny the fullframe iso is better in general .And you can crop a lot!
I think the cropping part is the kicker. Mike says he thinks the IQ from Olympus is good enough for him not to care about IQ differences. Which to me means his field craft is so good, he pretty much hardly ever needs to crop much. If he were to crop the way I do, than even small differences in IQ start to show and make a difference.
Thanks for the video. I’m a hobbyist bird photographer and looking at getting rid of my Sony a7iv with 100-400 GM plus x1.4 tc that is basically welded to the lens. Wanting to stay light or lighter hence no 200-600. Shooting many small wrens and finches in Brisbane, often low light, but 800mm at f6.3 with the OM is about equal or better than f8 with tc and cropped in camera or f11 with x2 tc. I think you would agree with the side by side it is at least equal or better for how I shoot, plus all the additional capabilities of the OM-1. Much better fps, pro capture and better stability with the OM 100-400 allowing for lower shutter speeds to compensate for lower ISO. I’m not interested in competitions and I like some background. Not a bird on a stick person. Hopefully if the OM-1 is as good or better than the Sony a1, it is miles ahead of the a7iv. Sony seem have deserted the a7iv with firmware updates and no long light lenses in the road map. Appreciate any thoughts. Thanks again.
I never worry about image quality. All cameras take good pictures. I look at the features on a camera that I want. With the OM-1 I shoot at 1600 iso as normal and go higher without much concern. If it is lightweight you are looking for MFt is the way to go.
Thank you very much for sharing your decision making process, Mike. I can't imagine you'll ever have buyers remorse for choosing the OM-1 because you did do such a thorough process in making your choice. That only leaves us to look forward to each of your new posts now.
Thanks for all the work. I’m a long time Olympus shooter. My first was the EP1. I was hoping the original OMD-Em1 would be my new sports camera. Sadly the auto focus wasn’t up to the task. I’ve had ever version of the OMD except the X. What I find strange is the OM1 does so well on tracking birds. But, not people in sporting situations. On a DP review the compare the OM1 with the Canon R6II for sports tracking. OMD told the reviewers not to use tracking. They tried and it failed. I just find it strange the tracking works so well on small birds but not people.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Yes but priced in favour of the consumer in OM's case, and in favour of the manufacturer in Sony's case. Given that bodies are replaced more often than lenses. Makes me wonder if Sony are using the razor and blades model.
I switched from Canon to Olympus Om-1 partly influenced by Mike's videos. I have to say I'm not that impressed by its bird autofocus capabilities. Most of the shots I get are slightly out of focus even in very good light at 2500/s. The lens is Olympus 100-400mm which costs around 1200eur. I used the same settings as Mike and fiddled with it a few times with the same result. I have been photographing for 13 years so I'm not a rookie by any means. People don't realize the main difference is 7000eur Olympus 150-400mm PRO lens.... Just saying - don't expect the same results with 100-400mm... Keep on good work Mike we love your videos.
Sorry you are disappointed with the 100 400. I have both lenses and get sharp images with either. Lenses do vary as individuals.. Had the same discussion with someone about the Sony 200-600
@@MikeLaneFRPS Thanks for quick reply Mike. It's still a new camera to me and overall I'm impressed. It's lightweight and that's great too. I may be doing something wrong or it's just 40 years of your experience. All the best and thanks for great content. It inspires us all
@@MikeLaneFRPS Still, I can't wrap my head around you prefering Om-1 to Sony A1. What was the main factor for you choosing Om-1? Was it reach? The weight difference between the two combos is mere 450g. I believe overall Sony A1 will produce a higher quality images being a full frame camera. Also AF must be better on A1. Currently Olympus combo you use costs around 2200eur more than Sony+200-600mm. So I'm leaning towards Sony but I did not use it yet. I couldn't afford it at the time. Om-1 handles noise very well for being such a small sensor but I don't think it can compare to A1 in real life. Just curious what was the number one reason for you choosing it because I has to have a good point for you being such an experienced photographer. Happy New Year Mike and I wish you a lot of wonderful photo experiences this year. Denis
@@denissmusicchannel1381 I made 5 YT films on the subject if you want the details. Probably the last one sums it up. Films on the Sony A1 versus the OM-1 in order. czcams.com/video/dNj1mws2SGM/video.html czcams.com/video/4sp8UwFnYz0/video.html czcams.com/video/apT-GTlbeO4/video.html czcams.com/video/ic3FzqZnndo/video.html czcams.com/video/LQbQ0Ft1-zU/video.html
Such a refreshing video on committing (in your case re-committing) to a brand / system. I like how you used a natural process to help you choose the camera (it became your "go to" camera).
Well done, I had the EM1 MK11 and had the 150-400 ordered, impatience got the better of me and I cancelled the order and bought the R5 and 100-500. Looking back I wish I had waited or even bought the Sony
You can always sell r5. I tested the z9 and r5 at the same time and was close to buying the z9 and sell all m43 lenses and cameras. Today i'm happy that i waited for om1. I have m1mii, om1, sold m1miii and i'm waiting for the second om1.
BTW, I can tell you why no other manufacturer has pro capture in their flagships. With their larger RAW file sizes, it's impossible for a full frame camera to provide a meaningful frame rate for pro capture, a meaningful buffer size for RAW files and the processing power required to flush the RAW files to storage while doing RAW processing at the same time. The Z9 may be a monster of a camera, but it can do only 20fps for RAW, if you want 30fps you only get jpgs, if you want faster rates, you end up with 120fps and 11MP jpgs. Pathetic. The OM1 can hold more than a 100 RAW files in buffer before writing to disk regardless if you use mechanical shutter or electronic shutter. The other issue is more practical. Fast SD storage. These full frame, high resolution RAW files cannot be written to disk fast enough. The fastest cards available and supported in flagship cameras do up to 300MB/s. That's barely enough write speed to handle the OM1 files at a reasonable frame rate. The OM1 RAW files are 18MB to 20MB from what I can tell. The fastest SD cards will average writing about 15 such files to disk per second. Assuming a 47MP full frame camera would even support comparable frame rates and buffer sizes/speeds (impossible today), it would struggle writing the files to disk fast enough, being bottle-necked by ~5 frames per second write speed to the fastest SD cards. You'd take a sequence of shots with pro capture on your A1, then wait three times as long compared to the OM1 before the camera is available again because it's stuck with writing files. You'll miss moments and it would be an extremely frustrating experience. The other practical issue is fast SD storage size options. I went out whale watching with my E-M1 III and the 100-400mm. I only had dual 128GB cards with 300MB/s. I only went out for a couple of hours and shot for a fraction of that time and I managed to get pretty close to filling up the card with pro capture. I bought 256MB cards with 300MB/s now, but it's not cheap. For stills wild life photographers, the E-M1 III, E-M1X and OM1 are the best choices once you accept that 20MP is sufficient.
Thanks for the video Mike. As always, your logical approach is always worth the time and I (we) appreciate the effort you put into these CZcamss. I would imagine this is very useful to many either sitting on the fence or like me to get that extra confirmation that I made the right choice. Now all needs to happen is that OMSystems need to increase their output, I would exchange my EM1x for a second OM-1 if they were readily available in the shops.
I'm not surprised by your choice. I agree with every word. I was close to buying z9 but waited for om1 and i'm happy now. Om1 focuses on forerground too often. I hope this will change with new firmware. Ergonomics, dust resistance, speed of operation are fantastic and nobody talks about it. Pro capture is the biggest advantage. The Z9 has this function, but only for 11mpx jpgs.. The reason why other cameras don't have real pro capture is the size of the files and cpu. A1 and Z9 use faster cards, but they are not able to write big files to the buffer, in the loop internally. Use kingston react plus sd cards. I've been using them for a year and they are great. Sandisk and toshiba are both good but cost twice as much.
The Nikon Z9 as of firmware 2.0 has a "pro capture" like feature at 30fps for 45 megapixel JPEGs. And also at 120fps for 11 megapixel JPEGs. Unfortunately no RAW support at this time.
Thanks for the very helpful video. I have the OM-1 on order largely because of the lighter weight of some of the lenses. Also, the price point versus the Sony a1 is very attractive. I currently use a Fuji X-T3 and Sigma 150-600 lens with adapter.
Fantastic comparison...thank you Mike!!! You are absolutely correct about the dimness of the OM-D EM-1 viewfinder. Part of the reason I bought it was to film owls...AT NIGHT! I did find a workaround though. I put the camera in Bulb setting, manual focus and frame the shot, and quickly switch to Shutter or Manual setting to take the picture once the raptor looks my way. I look at the viewfinder (or LCD screen) of my friends with the Sony A1 and it is BRIGHT...but some of my shots rival theirs. If you are deft about it and know your Oly camera in the dark, you can do quite well. Thanks for the comparison!
I did much the same. I was afraid that it was the end for the olympus and bought a Sony FF and lenses. It is a great system. I added the OM-1 more or less to try it out. A few months later I sold the Sony added the the 100-400 for birds. I like to do walkabouts and it was easier to carry my kit for this old man and the images were as good.
Well done Mike you took your time and made some good points to finalise your decision, true wisdom! I am sure the OM 1 will continue to serve you well! I am looking forward to Fuji announcements with the new 150-600mm and X-H2s & X-H2. I will soon see if their focus system will be up to scratch for birds in flight and keep up with the rest of the latest cameras! I hope so! Kind regards Anthony
Nice video Mike. Last week, I shot kingfishers with a 900 dollar mint 600 mm f5.6 ais Nikkor I got from Ebay. Works fine on full frame and m43. Wonderful😊.
Interesting comparison Mike I shoot with a Panasonic Lumix G9 and 100-400 lens and have just become addicted to bird photography. I think in a year or so I will give the OM1 a look
Another great video Mike! As an A1 shooting and following the observations you make I would have gone with the A1. Image quality and cropability are high on the list for me over procapture. I’m sure whoever goes with the OM1 won’t be disappointed and l look forward to many more of your brilliant videos.
That is a great video - I am ordering one now, and I will sell my Nikon gear. This is a big decision for me, because I DO like the files from my Nikon Z6 and Z7 mk 2. But if you want the best full frame is an expensive way to go - here I think about the lenses. So I will start with The 300 mm pro F4 - and hopefully I.can pick up a OM-1 You helped me decide - Thanks
I have been in your position Sony or Olympus. One thing I think you should note is that you were using the masterpiece of a lens 150-400mm on the Olympus with mega price point against the much more affordable Sony 200-600mm..I know for sure when doing this kind of comparison just how the lenses effect the results. Thats why a lot of tests on CZcams are rediculous as not enough thought put into getting comparable lenses.. I was a real dedicated Olympus user but took the biggest financial loss in my pro career of 40 years when changing to Sony. I truly hope that Olympus will keep going forward, as tech like Pro Capture and their Image Stabilisation system are so far in front of the competition. Wonderful Images and Video of the birds you managed here..regards.
For a moment there I thought you were going to pick Sony 🤣 I have been watching your videos for couple years now and was a bit sad when you started to use the A1. I have the om1 for about 2 months now don’t even think about switching to another brand fantastic camera the AF is awesome. 👍
Very interesting video. I appreciate your logic and your humor. You have given me a lot to think about, and I like that. Lovely shots of birds, too. Thank you.
Surprising choice. I expected the Sony to be a better camera although it seems that OMDS is the preferred market for bird photography. As for the computational stuff I only have the EM1 II and have only used Pro Capture. Never tried any of the other modes. I like that feature and the other cameras I am interested in Fuji have something similar.
Good decision! Though I really like Sony, having owned an A9 and A7R4, you are absolutely right about dust on the sensors. I am enjoyng my OM1's and as far as I'm concerned, the OM1 is the best wildlife/macro camera for me, regardless of price. I'm looking forward to your to seeing what you accomplish with it over the next 12 months. I have picked up quite a few tips from you, Andy Rouse, Roger Hance and Derek Forss, and it's marvellous that you all use the OM1.
My Sony A7iii was horrible when it came to sensor dust. I picked up an A1 last December, not sure what Sony changed but I haven't had any sensor dust problems yet.
@@wildcat1065 Given the firmware update for the Sony A1 will be the Sony A1 ii, it would make more sense to put your money into lenses, not bodies; so, in the end, the Sony will still be more expensive IMO.
@@JohnsClicks firmware updates have nothing to do with effective dof, which is what he said and what you ignored... that's typical behavior for m4/3 owners, unfortunately.
@@DragRacingTV What does price have to do with DOF? It seems obvious to me that you'd rather put your money into a great lens. Sony's notorious for not updating their firmware... or doing so with another body. At $5500/ body, it's expensive. Not sure what stereotype of M43 users you're trying to push. He made both points about DOF- having more with M43 and less with FF... and?
@@JohnsClicks of course you don't understand why $2k vs. $7.5k for similar effective dof is a huge difference, and again that's typical for m4/3 owners... we both got it, you didn't... sony has already released three firmware updates for the a1, so you are flat-out lying about that, which is not surprising for an m4/3 owner.
An excellent well thought out video Mike ... even has a devoted Canon R3 user I enjoyed every minute of your internal debate has to your final choice. All the very best on your photographic journey ... best regards .
Fascinating insight into your camera choice journey Mike. I think it is wise to stick to one system for a good while as you get to learn all the settings, buttons etc and a real sense of what the camera can do. And this is crucial for wildlife photography as you are then well placed to have the correct settings for any scenario that unfolds quickly.
Hi Mike. I am glad you mentioned the outstanding dust reduction on the Olympus and also the Capture Pro feature. When comparing the cameras, did the lens performance (200-600 vs. 150-400 + 1.25 TC) influence your decision? As well as the overall weight and portability?
Funny, I did the same thing you did, Mike. When Olympus was in the process of selling their camera division, and I needed a newer camera, I wound up buying a Canon EOS R. A couple years later, and after getting my old E-M1 repaired (it's more than six years old now), I almost always pick up the Olympus. I'm pretty sure that I'm going to sell the Canon kit and double down with OMDS.
Hello from Oz. I recently purchased the 100-400mm lens and thought I'd just use it as is before trying out the ProCapture. That's the next step on my agenda. I would love the lens you've been using but the one I bought is lighter and that's important when you have a busted shoulder.
enjoyed the series of videos Mike, a no nonsense critique of both camera bodies and systems, the good, the bad and the ugly, I wish more reviewers were as open and transparent . The Olympus 150-400 is a lens whose performance appears to be vastly superior to the 300 f4 pro by some margin? also, given that its a zoom it obviously more flexible , so....a question if I may, if you were limited in lens choice to just the 300 f4 ( plus TC's) for wildlife would your decision have been be the same? btw, I'm still dithering as to whether to sell the A9ii and 200-600 as my OM1 has not arrived, I'm still using the EM1iii LOL
I'm curious to see Mike's thoughts on your question, too. As someone that has been able to shoot the 300/4 since it debuted and the 150-400 recently, with a friend that owns one, and doing some tests, I would not say the 150-400 is sharper than the 300. But it is AS sharp and has good sharpness at 400 and at 500/5.6 so it brings you magnification that will be a little sharper than the 300+2x and perhaps even to the 300+1.4x with I think better contrast on the 150-400 overall. Maybe someone has done scientific acuity tests that show an edge to one of them over the other, but in practical use, there's no easily noticeable difference in image quality, just as Mike noticed no significant difference between the 50MP A1 and 20MP OM sensors in output when put to blind tests. The OM-1 will be very easy for you to adapt to from the 1.3 as the button layout is virtually identical with the additional AF button. For everything else you do apart from birds in flight, the two cameras will produce very similar results but the OM-1 will get them much more quickly as it processes several times faster than the 1.3. Things like focus stacking and high res work are now very practical modes to use rather than specialty modes used only on occasion, and as Mike said, ProCapture at 50fps is very practical for smaller faster birds. With the previous models, for small birds, I'd usually just use ProCap H and SAF to try and get several frames at 60fps as they took off or approached a perch because they're too fast for the camera to track. But with OM-1, the SH2 mode at 50fps will actually do a decent job of moving with the birds as they take off toward or away from you.
The 300mm and 150-400mm are both optically fine, but now we have zooms producing very sharp pictures I would not have gone for the OM-1 without it. For years I used Canons, 500, 600 and 800mm lenses and complained every day that I missed pictures because I could not zoom back.
I own the Olympus OM-1 couple months ago I rented the sony A1 and honestly the ergonomics are horribles the menu too. But if I have the money to invest in the A1 instead I'll do it with out any hesitation amazing electronic view finder way better autofocus with out mention way less noise reduction capabilities. The ability to crop more with out losing much details in the sony A1 it's awsome, more dynamite range way more derails in the pic 50mp vs 20 mega pixels on the OM-1 its just not enough for 2022. In my opinion. And I love using my Olympus for Weddings. But for wildlife I want more details in bird photography for example.
An excellent if surprising video. I’m really pleased I opted for the OM1 now all I need is to receive the one ordered in February from WEX Photographic. 😟
Pitty I really would like to have bought your Olympus 150-400😉. Thanks for the great and extensive comparison. I've used the A7 IV, A9 and the A1 on a demo for several hours. I was surprised how good the OM-system keeps up. If you don't need the higher resolution there is no need to switch IMO. None of them feel as comfortable, professional and rugged as the OM-1 for me.
It is not because of this. It is because the top notch sensor cleaning system. The speed and acceleration that the sensor vibrates when you switch the camera on, obliterates the dust. I never ever had to clean a sensor and I had the em1.2, em1.3 and now OM1 Just one more advantage of having a smaller sensor
@@moisescugat3948 The Panasonic G7, which does not have IBIS presumably does not have a dust shaker as good as Olympus. In my experience with that camera, resistance to visible dust in images was still quite good.
@@ZakWilson that’s fantastic then!! What I am telling is that this camera has a system specifically created for that purpose. And what I can tell you is that I am not careful at all with sensor… it is just not necessary. I change lenses on the beach, or in windy days…
I discovered that photographing swallows head at 10-15 meters on a beach with dried seaweed is hard for my Canon cameras. The cameras really loves the dried seaweed. I suppose that a beach with dried seaweed serves as a difficult test field for camera auto focus.
I was leaning towards OM-1 as well as I already have a Lumix G9 and would like better autofocus. However I think I'm going to wait a few more months to see what the final specs on the Canon R7 is, especially regarding the electronic shutter...being non-stacked sensor will readout speed remain at only 1/60s like the R5 or will they be able to push it to 1/120s. Also whether or not it has some sort of pre-burst function would be the two specs that will weight my decision. If the R7 comes in at under $2500 which I assume it will, combined with the 100-500 4.5-7.1 L that's going to come in $5400 about $4k less than the OM-1 with 150-400 4.5. Both would be 800mm FF equivalent. In terms of light gathering and depth of field in FF equivalent terms the OM setup will be about 2/3 of a stop faster but the R7 (if rumors are true) will have an extra 12.5mp of resolution to crop in with which is greater reach than the built-in 1.4tc will net.
Whatever choice you have made, it's always the Mike Lane behind the camera that takes the picture. Experience and a long life of loving birds and nature, that makes the difference. It's not only the possibilities, it's how you use the possibilities.
I’m very happy with my OM1+300f4 (and the complete PRO line). I’m also a Nikon user but I almost never use Nikon anymore. My Wife continues to use Nikon. After more than 25 years as a professional Photographer I could not be happier with my equipment!
Just switched from canon to Om system.i do not regret it a second time
I switched from Nikon to Sony recently and the dust was insane. I had dust on my sensor the first day I got my a7riii. So that is amazing to hear about the om-1. Goodbye dust! I got the om-1 mostly for macro of insects so the increased dof is going to be HUGE for me as well.
An excellent, well informed video my good sir!
what do you do lol. ive had a7r2, r3 , r4 and A1 never have any dust issues.
Du musst lernen mit Technik umzugehen und pfleglich behandeln. Am Besten du reinigst einmal deine Wohnung und befreist sie von Staub.
The sensor dust on my A7iii was bad. Not sure what Sony did but I've been shooting with the A1 for 2 years and have had zero problems with sensor dust.
Great stuff Mike, I was confident all along you'd go back to Olympus. Regrettably I've flitted through camera systems and nothing has felt as good and inspiring as Olympus cameras to use. Their ergonomics as you say are superb, their pro series glass is stupidly sharp and I never had to clean the sensors. Also I loved how I was able to carry my 300mm f4 and a landscape lens in the bag, do a long hike and not feel the weight
The ultrasonic sensor cleaner in all Oly cameras are simply the very best in the industry. I have used numerous Oly digital cameras for the past 12 years and I have never ever cleaned any of their sensors, even after countless times of lens changing. My Panasonic G80 and Nikon D750 sensors needed to be cleaned a few times a year, even when I am ultra careful not to change the lenses in dusty environments.
Equipment aside... Mike, your channel is absolutely fantastic. I thought I was reasonably knowledgeable where fieldcraft goes, but you really know your stuff. Please, please keep it up. Although I am a professional photographer doing commercial and equine photography, my hobby is wildlife work. It keeps me sane and is so rewarding when you get the shot that you want. Thanks for all the effort that goes into these videos. Your channel is the only one have notifications on for!
Mike, not sure you have noticed. The Pro capture with CAF now works with Panasonic and Sigma lenses now. I am not sure whether all of them will work but I have tried many of them and they all seem to work. Just another advantage and that Panasonic Leica 200 F2.8 could be a special use case in some scenarios.
Nice. Great point on needing to shoot at f8 on a full frame. There are great values in additional depth of field, of which m43 is at an advantage. All else equal, you can shoot at 2 stops lower iso for the same DOF, which close in on the "quality" gap. Also, bokeh are the easy thing to adjust "fake" in post, especially with birds, where the background are often very non distinct. It would still be nice if OM can make for example, a 200mm f1.4, which will render in image like 400mm f2.8 on FF. Not far fetched I think, since they will only have to design around the much smaller image circle of m43. Meanwhile, I am still waiting for OM1 to be in stock.
This reasoning is so stupid. The iso noise performance is 2 stops better on FF because of the sensor size
I have the OM-1….best bang for the buck, period!
An excellent real world discussion of how these two cameras worked in your hands.
At the very end you brought up the OM-1's Pro Capture feature, and wondered why other manufacturers hadn't yet incorporated it on their cameras. A good part of the answer has to do with that 20 MP sensor that so many people (not you!) complain about. The data processing and temporary storage is 2.5 times greater on a 50 MP camera than on the OM-1. With that comes extra heat generation, which is already a major issue with image processors jammed withing the confines of a sealed camera body, perhaps requiring additional (noisy) cooling fans; higher costs for faster processors and bigger/faster RAM modules to handle the imaging workflow; and faster draining batteries which are called on for that processing. There are more than weight advantages in OM Systems keeping the size and pixel count low with their new camera line. I'm reminded of the words of Colin Chapman, the creator of Lotus sports cars: "simplify, then add lightness;" that magic formula doesn't just work for race cars.
This was such a refreshing review. Focusing on what matters and not focusing on megapixels 👌🏻
I just hope sony design and tech department watch this video! Good luck Mike and all your points were so true.
I'm delighted that you chose the OM-1. I will be getting one myself and it won't be a huge loss to me for not getting the A1 because I can't afford it. LOL
2 years back I made the same brand decision: Sony vs. Olympus (by that time the OM1.3). And I agree, the AF was so superior (not the same ballpark by that time) - but the weight difference, the price and - of course - the PreCap mode plus the much better menu system (which improved further) made my decision. And - a lot like you - I was short to regretting because of all the bad news. But now I purchased finally the OM-1 and I am absolutely eager to starting using it.
Fantastic... the new Olympus - OM SYSTEM camera is a very good choice... 👌🏻👍🏻💪🏻 ; I will still continue with the fantastic Olympus OM-D E-M1X ... (besides , I'm sure they'll do some new Firmware update more fine-tuned for the E- M1X ...) 👌🏻👍🏻💪🏻💖💖
Greetings from Spain
I'm so sorry Mike that you have lost a lot of your fan-base (Sony ones)! The OM-1 is quite simply an astonishing camera and the OMDS AI modes, e.g. ProCapture, Focus stacking and Live Composite are features that most OMDS (or Olympus) haters do not want to talk about. I use them very often and they are simply game-changers for my photographic requirements. Thanks for a very impartial review.
One way to compare the two is financially. If I wished to have the OM-1 I'd be looking for US $2,000 for the camera. Whereas if I wanted a Sony A-1 I'd be needing $6,500 for the camera. The Olympus Zuiko lens would be $7,500. Whereas the Sony 200-600mm would cost $2,000. The two rigs are almost mirror images of each other! Only reversed.
Yes most people miss that point.
Not really, 300 mm f4 Pro is only 2,500$. That means 4,500$ for the set up.
I just made the same decision around two weeks ago, and I sold my Sony a1 and 200-600 with several GM lenses.One of the reasons of my decision,I didn’t like the IQ of 200-600mm.It wasn’t even close the 600mm GM quality.Unfortunately I had two brain surgeries last two years and It was really difficult to keep carrying the 600mm f4 all day long.With the help of a lady In Poland who works for a big photo shop,she arranged for me the OM-1 with 150-400 f4.5.I loved the lens at the moment I hold it in my hands.IQ of this lens not far from the Sony 600mm f4,it is much more versatile with 1000mm FF equivalent and I can use it handholding with shutter speeds I couldn’t dream it wit any FF cameras.My hit rate on BIF is not better than Sony a1,I don’t know what I am doing wrong, but I would like to get your help if you can share with me,which setting do you use for your BIF photography.If you can make a video for this it will be perfect.Anyway thanks for series of nice CZcams videos.
Hi, if you are looking for AF and BIF settings for the om1 you may watch one of Espen Helland's new videos! :)
@@chiara1086 Thanks,I already watched it,still I don’t have the hit rates which I was abled with my Sony a1.I am very pleased with the optical quality of the 150-400 f4.5 but the BIF AF quality of the OM-1 still not good enough for me.I have the camera less than 3 weeks so I have to practice more and find the best settings for me.
@@victorfeinstein1815 Or maybe that 600GM is just that much faster in terms of AF. It is much faster than the 200-600G, which according to Mike works comparable to the Olympus combo.
After the last OM-1 firmware update the CAF is now working much better than before.
@@victorfeinstein1815 victor I’ve pinged u a Facebook message hope you can help thanks
After watching the rest of the video I see that you made a very intelligent and well-thought-out decision. Thanks for describing the different features and shortcomings of each camera setup. I currently have a Sony and an R6 and I really hope they will add that pro capture feature somehow in a firmware update.
Eos r7 got the pre capture features now,is similar like the pro capture,just the tracking not that good while on pre capture
Having had opportunities to borrow and shoot the Sony A9/A1 with 400/2.8 and 200-600 for the past couple years, along with my OM System cameras, I was of a mind similar to you, Mike, and once I got the OM-1, I was very surprised with how comfortable the handling is compared to previous OM System bodies I used as well as the Sony bodies. It is the most comfortable camera body I can recall every having the pleasure of using. My second body will arrive next week so that will be great to have a two body kit for wildlife and sports event work. I enjoyed your series very much and learned quite a lot from your many tips and experience you have. Much appreciated.
Great video content Mike. I’m just starting my birds in flight journey. Purchased the OM-1 and 75-300 and getting some good results but not consistent. Would love too see a video on your settings for BIF. Thanks for your time Mike.
I really enjoy your honest and down to earth videos and also appreciate the great results you always show.
As an OM-1 owner I would like to say that if I were in your place, then I would for sure keep both the Sony A1 and the OMD OM1 - both are great tools in their own way.Expensive solution ? Yes but spending a minor fortune on a new camera only hurts once.
Regarding Pro-capture: You are spot on, I simply don't understand why Nikon,Sony and Canon don't offer Pro-Capture for full Raw and neither does my good friend who use the Canon R5.
He is very annoyed at Canon as he thinks an Olympus style Pro Capture mode on his Canon would make it almost perfect.
I hope to visit merry old England (UK) one day for a 2 week birding trip (Kingfishers,Red kites, eagles etc.)
I love the 4/3 system. Mike I know you made a very good choice. on the other hand Olympus is a camera very resistant to water and dust.
I can't imagine you'll be sorry you made this choice. I'm just envious, as I don't have either the OM-1, nor the wonderful 150-400mm. That said, I'm very happy with my E-M1X and 100-400mm. I went out a few days ago and got a great shot of a Great Blue Heron flying off with a huge perch he had just caught. You're right about Pro Capture too -- it's another Oly innovation that will eventually be in every high end camera.
Whilst the E-M1 II got Pro Capture in 2016 the Lumix G7 got pre-burst a year earlier and that was updated onto the GH4. Whilst most of the Lumix used hybrid 4K/6K for the job the G9 can pre-burst full sensor. 6K/4K is a movie mode, on the G9 6K goes 30fps and 4K 60fps or 30fps. Whilst the G9 cannot buffer as many frames as the OM1 that may be an advantage as you probably only get one money shot and bin the rest, the usual mode is the slower SH1-Pre to avoid filling the card with rubbish. You can end up waiting for buffering to store down before you can shoot again; best to switch back to single. Bird recognition on the G9 is good, tracking does work, but AFC may breathe a frame or two. The G9 does not flicker the EVF. The thing with the G9 + PL100-400 and the barking mad stabilisation is it becomes hand-held. And more accessible to the amateur budget.
apparently pro capture like feature was available in nikon 1 camera system. i dont know if this was the nikons innovation. Re-Introduction back into Z9 is very welcome, yet the Z9 cannot shoot in RAW as yet, like Olympus.
@@jeffslade1892 The problem with the G9 pre-burst is that it is jpeg and lower resolution only, so you are very limited in post processing.
@@TL-xw6fh no - you are looking at the 6K pre burst. It will also pre-burst on SH1 and SH2 with full size raw+jpeg. Not as fast as the 6K/4K shooting at movie speeds maybe but certainly full resolution. Two slots on the dial for storing whatever your burst preferences are.
@@TL-xw6fh No actually not. The pre burst can go raw+jpeg full resolution. You are thinking of the 6K/4K pre-burst which can rock movie fps. Either you have not found it yet or you do not have a G9.
Great work again, Mike! The OM-1 must be a fantastic camera to make you switch. I'm sticking with my Sony A1 and 600mm f4, it's the best set-up I've ever used. I'm sure you'll get a quick sale on the Sony A1...brilliant camera for my birds in flight work. A real bonus is that it takes a 1.4x teleconverter beautifully. Barely no degradation in image quality and autofocus speed is still super fast. Looking forward to seeing more of your work with your new set-up.
Congratulations Mike! I am sure that you will be happy with your decision!
I just sold my Nikon equipment and switched to "Olympus". And because I don`t have the patience to wait for the OM1, I bought an EM1 III for the meantime.
Thanks for your painstaking research!
Great video Mike with all the fearures from both cameras covered thoroughly Your bird and wildlife videos put nature first and show the reality of what's needed to achieve the wonderful images you provide and that comes across always. I am pleased you have chosen the OM camera and hope their are more of your videos to come. Thank you.
13:04. Wow! Now THAT is a great photograph. Subbed for that alone.
👌👏👏👏How well explained. Thank you.
For me weight is a deciding factor. It is a matter of taking care of the health of the back, joints, etc. In addition, the micro four thirds system, by using less volume of material for the construction of objectives, is even MORE ECOLOGICAL. Personally I would have made the same choice.
I personally believe that most of the manufacturers of classic cameras and Sony (which bought Minolta) have known how to create in the consumer the need to keep the old 24x36mm format, but not to do photographers a favor, the favor is for the manufacturers themselves so that they can continue to take advantage of the old optical designs of the 35mm format...
I had thought you would choose the OM-1. I'm still sold on Canon but love these videos comparing different cameras.
Everything you say is my opinion. But I chose the E-M1X instead of the OM-1 first because it saved me $ 1,600 for the price I bought it for. Once you add the Battery grip and extra battery to the OM-1, something the EM1X has. The next thing that tipped the scales between the two cameras is the E-M1X wonderful automatic focus with the new bird update. Yes OM-1 is certainly better, but I come from the world of Canon where it's pretty bad. I use E-M1X in combination with 300mm F4 and sometimes 1.4MC and appreciate the lightness of this combination compared to my Canon lens which is twice as heavy. Finally, the OM-1 will be available at the end of June. I made the order in March and I am glad that I canceled it after the long wait. The E-M1X is all I need so far.
You showed up on my CZcams feed over a year ago Mike and I've enjoyed them all
nice to hear a photographer talking and also knowing what he is on about cant beat some great experience. subbed
Thanks for the sub!
@@MikeLaneFRPS no probs was an interesting video. im an A1 user love it but also an rx10iv user which i also love. smaller sensors deffo have their benefits
Thank you Mike, you made a lot of very well reasoned and coherent points in this video. One consideration I have always had when thinking about camera gear is the fact that camera bodies generally get a much shorter production lifespan than the glass that they attach to and although lenses have all sorts of wonderful features these days, the quality of glass and construction of the lens elements stays as new for a lot longer than any camera body. Bodies and lenses come and go but I suspect that the OM-1 will have a much shorter life in production than the 150-400mm. What I am trying to say is that it is makes a lot more sense to put cash into lenses and change these a lot less than camera bodies which by their nature will/should get better at each relatively frequent update. For what it is worth, you have made an excellent choice I think.
And by this rationale, look at what Sony does. They put all their "money" (actually OUR money) into the A-1. The 200-600 lens is chicken feed by comparison. That said, I am still pissed off about OM System way of charging their bloody batteries!
Super video. Very clear and informative but with a nice dash of your understated humour. I've been following this series with great interest to see which you would finally choose. A nice choice to have to make. Look forward to your future films with the OM-1.
We have the same kingfisher statue at home, just with a slightly different foot... Interesting video - glad you were able to decide on one of these cameras - sometimes it's not easy to choose - the competition is high. But in the end there is always that one brand that fits best ;) - Best regards
Thanks.
The never ending Arms/Camera race! What will be the next leap frog de jour be? What counts for me is that someone shows how to go about taking beautiful pictures and video. The tips of learning bird behaviors and good composition are as important as photography technique. Thanks for providing all these in an integrated way.
I shoot the a1 with 600GM and 400 GM.I am convinced the Olympus lens is great quality and the system is compact is lower in weight.the only thought about the OM 1 I have is the sensor high iso performance.You can’t deny the fullframe iso is better in general .And you can crop a lot!
I think the cropping part is the kicker. Mike says he thinks the IQ from Olympus is good enough for him not to care about IQ differences. Which to me means his field craft is so good, he pretty much hardly ever needs to crop much. If he were to crop the way I do, than even small differences in IQ start to show and make a difference.
Thanks for the video. I’m a hobbyist bird photographer and looking at getting rid of my Sony a7iv with 100-400 GM plus x1.4 tc that is basically welded to the lens. Wanting to stay light or lighter hence no 200-600. Shooting many small wrens and finches in Brisbane, often low light, but 800mm at f6.3 with the OM is about equal or better than f8 with tc and cropped in camera or f11 with x2 tc. I think you would agree with the side by side it is at least equal or better for how I shoot, plus all the additional capabilities of the OM-1. Much better fps, pro capture and better stability with the OM 100-400 allowing for lower shutter speeds to compensate for lower ISO. I’m not interested in competitions and I like some background. Not a bird on a stick person. Hopefully if the OM-1 is as good or better than the Sony a1, it is miles ahead of the a7iv. Sony seem have deserted the a7iv with firmware updates and no long light lenses in the road map. Appreciate any thoughts. Thanks again.
I never worry about image quality. All cameras take good pictures. I look at the features on a camera that I want. With the OM-1 I shoot at 1600 iso as normal and go higher without much concern. If it is lightweight you are looking for MFt is the way to go.
Thank you very much for sharing your decision making process, Mike. I can't imagine you'll ever have buyers remorse for choosing the OM-1 because you did do such a thorough process in making your choice. That only leaves us to look forward to each of your new posts now.
Thanks for all the work. I’m a long time Olympus shooter. My first was the EP1. I was hoping the original OMD-Em1 would be my new sports camera. Sadly the auto focus wasn’t up to the task. I’ve had ever version of the OMD except the X. What I find strange is the OM1 does so well on tracking birds. But, not people in sporting situations. On a DP review the compare the OM1 with the Canon R6II for sports tracking. OMD told the reviewers not to use tracking. They tried and it failed. I just find it strange the tracking works so well on small birds but not people.
Another great video Mike, as a proud OM1 user it really does everything OM Systems promised it’s a great camera.
Thank you for your assessments what a great review from someone who owns both systems there’s also a big price difference between these 2 systems
Both cost around the £8000 mark with body and lens.
@@MikeLaneFRPS Yes but priced in favour of the consumer in OM's case, and in favour of the manufacturer in Sony's case.
Given that bodies are replaced more often than lenses. Makes me wonder if Sony are using the razor and blades model.
I switched from Canon to Olympus Om-1 partly influenced by Mike's videos. I have to say I'm not that impressed by its bird autofocus capabilities. Most of the shots I get are slightly out of focus even in very good light at 2500/s. The lens is Olympus 100-400mm which costs around 1200eur. I used the same settings as Mike and fiddled with it a few times with the same result. I have been photographing for 13 years so I'm not a rookie by any means. People don't realize the main difference is 7000eur Olympus 150-400mm PRO lens.... Just saying - don't expect the same results with 100-400mm... Keep on good work Mike we love your videos.
Sorry you are disappointed with the 100 400. I have both lenses and get sharp images with either. Lenses do vary as individuals.. Had the same discussion with someone about the Sony 200-600
@@MikeLaneFRPS Thanks for quick reply Mike. It's still a new camera to me and overall I'm impressed. It's lightweight and that's great too. I may be doing something wrong or it's just 40 years of your experience. All the best and thanks for great content. It inspires us all
@@MikeLaneFRPS Still, I can't wrap my head around you prefering Om-1 to Sony A1. What was the main factor for you choosing Om-1? Was it reach? The weight difference between the two combos is mere 450g. I believe overall Sony A1 will produce a higher quality images being a full frame camera. Also AF must be better on A1. Currently Olympus combo you use costs around 2200eur more than Sony+200-600mm. So I'm leaning towards Sony but I did not use it yet. I couldn't afford it at the time. Om-1 handles noise very well for being such a small sensor but I don't think it can compare to A1 in real life. Just curious what was the number one reason for you choosing it because I has to have a good point for you being such an experienced photographer. Happy New Year Mike and I wish you a lot of wonderful photo experiences this year. Denis
@@denissmusicchannel1381 I made 5 YT films on the subject if you want the details. Probably the last one sums it up.
Films on the Sony A1 versus the OM-1 in order.
czcams.com/video/dNj1mws2SGM/video.html czcams.com/video/4sp8UwFnYz0/video.html czcams.com/video/apT-GTlbeO4/video.html czcams.com/video/ic3FzqZnndo/video.html czcams.com/video/LQbQ0Ft1-zU/video.html
@@MikeLaneFRPS thank you I'll watch it
Such a refreshing video on committing (in your case re-committing) to a brand / system. I like how you used a natural process to help you choose the camera (it became your "go to" camera).
I agree with the dust issue with Sony.
Wow!
That was one of the best camera comparison videos I have ever seen.
Well done, I had the EM1 MK11 and had the 150-400 ordered, impatience got the better of me and I cancelled the order and bought the R5 and 100-500. Looking back I wish I had waited or even bought the Sony
You can always sell r5. I tested the z9 and r5 at the same time and was close to buying the z9 and sell all m43 lenses and cameras. Today i'm happy that i waited for om1. I have m1mii, om1, sold m1miii and i'm waiting for the second om1.
Wow just now found you friend been waiting you tube photography for years
interesting take Mike. I really need to try one of those OM-1 systems.
BTW, I can tell you why no other manufacturer has pro capture in their flagships. With their larger RAW file sizes, it's impossible for a full frame camera to provide a meaningful frame rate for pro capture, a meaningful buffer size for RAW files and the processing power required to flush the RAW files to storage while doing RAW processing at the same time.
The Z9 may be a monster of a camera, but it can do only 20fps for RAW, if you want 30fps you only get jpgs, if you want faster rates, you end up with 120fps and 11MP jpgs. Pathetic.
The OM1 can hold more than a 100 RAW files in buffer before writing to disk regardless if you use mechanical shutter or electronic shutter.
The other issue is more practical. Fast SD storage. These full frame, high resolution RAW files cannot be written to disk fast enough. The fastest cards available and supported in flagship cameras do up to 300MB/s. That's barely enough write speed to handle the OM1 files at a reasonable frame rate. The OM1 RAW files are 18MB to 20MB from what I can tell. The fastest SD cards will average writing about 15 such files to disk per second. Assuming a 47MP full frame camera would even support comparable frame rates and buffer sizes/speeds (impossible today), it would struggle writing the files to disk fast enough, being bottle-necked by ~5 frames per second write speed to the fastest SD cards. You'd take a sequence of shots with pro capture on your A1, then wait three times as long compared to the OM1 before the camera is available again because it's stuck with writing files. You'll miss moments and it would be an extremely frustrating experience.
The other practical issue is fast SD storage size options. I went out whale watching with my E-M1 III and the 100-400mm. I only had dual 128GB cards with 300MB/s. I only went out for a couple of hours and shot for a fraction of that time and I managed to get pretty close to filling up the card with pro capture. I bought 256MB cards with 300MB/s now, but it's not cheap.
For stills wild life photographers, the E-M1 III, E-M1X and OM1 are the best choices once you accept that 20MP is sufficient.
I thought CFExpress cards went well beyond 300MB/s.
Thanks for the video Mike. As always, your logical approach is always worth the time and I (we) appreciate the effort you put into these CZcamss. I would imagine this is very useful to many either sitting on the fence or like me to get that extra confirmation that I made the right choice. Now all needs to happen is that OMSystems need to increase their output, I would exchange my EM1x for a second OM-1 if they were readily available in the shops.
I'm not surprised by your choice. I agree with every word. I was close to buying z9 but waited for om1 and i'm happy now. Om1 focuses on forerground too often. I hope this will change with new firmware. Ergonomics, dust resistance, speed of operation are fantastic and nobody talks about it.
Pro capture is the biggest advantage. The Z9 has this function, but only for 11mpx jpgs.. The reason why other cameras don't have real pro capture is the size of the files and cpu. A1 and Z9 use faster cards, but they are not able to write big files to the buffer, in the loop internally. Use kingston react plus sd cards. I've been using them for a year and they are great. Sandisk and toshiba are both good but cost twice as much.
The Nikon Z9 as of firmware 2.0 has a "pro capture" like feature at 30fps for 45 megapixel JPEGs. And also at 120fps for 11 megapixel JPEGs. Unfortunately no RAW support at this time.
I have been shooting the D850 "which is a fantastic camera", two weeks ago I received my Z9. The Z9 is a D850 on steroids.
How many shoots before you fill the buffer when shooting in pro capture?
90
Thanks for the very helpful video. I have the OM-1 on order largely because of the lighter weight of some of the lenses. Also, the price point versus the Sony a1 is very attractive. I currently use a Fuji X-T3 and Sigma 150-600 lens with adapter.
Fantastic comparison...thank you Mike!!! You are absolutely correct about the dimness of the OM-D EM-1 viewfinder. Part of the reason I bought it was to film owls...AT NIGHT! I did find a workaround though. I put the camera in Bulb setting, manual focus and frame the shot, and quickly switch to Shutter or Manual setting to take the picture once the raptor looks my way. I look at the viewfinder (or LCD screen) of my friends with the Sony A1 and it is BRIGHT...but some of my shots rival theirs. If you are deft about it and know your Oly camera in the dark, you can do quite well. Thanks for the comparison!
I did much the same. I was afraid that it was the end for the olympus and bought a Sony FF and lenses. It is a great system.
I added the OM-1 more or less to try it out.
A few months later I sold the Sony added the the 100-400 for birds. I like to do walkabouts and it was easier to carry my kit for this old man and the images were as good.
Well done Mike you took your time and made some good points to finalise your decision, true wisdom! I am sure the OM 1 will continue to serve you well! I am looking forward to Fuji announcements with the new 150-600mm and X-H2s & X-H2. I will soon see if their focus system will be up to scratch for birds in flight and keep up with the rest of the latest cameras! I hope so! Kind regards Anthony
Nice video Mike. Last week, I shot kingfishers with a 900 dollar mint 600 mm f5.6 ais Nikkor I got from Ebay. Works fine on full frame and m43. Wonderful😊.
I got a cat hair on my OM-D EM-5 II sensor a while back. After power cycling the camera, it was gone. Awesome, underrated tech imo
Great overall review only spoiled by the irrelevant mid roll non skip ads. Will be getting the OM1 soon to go with my full Leica lenses.
Interesting analysis. As always I enjoy your humour and thought process as you work through the systems benefits.
Interesting comparison Mike I shoot with a Panasonic Lumix G9 and 100-400 lens and have just become addicted to bird photography. I think in a year or so I will give the OM1 a look
Yea it will be very cheap soon, just like the em1 mark iii second hand price now
Where did the OM1 became cheap :P @@snoopdoggty1086
Loved the bit about flipping the coin...
Thanks.
Another great video Mike! As an A1 shooting and following the observations you make I would have gone with the A1. Image quality and cropability are high on the list for me over procapture. I’m sure whoever goes with the OM1 won’t be disappointed and l look forward to many more of your brilliant videos.
Couldn't go back to a camera without procapture, but surely the next Sony will have it.
That is a great video - I am ordering one now, and I will sell my Nikon gear. This is a big decision for me, because I DO like the files from my Nikon Z6 and Z7 mk 2.
But if you want the best full frame is an expensive way to go - here I think about the lenses.
So I will start with The 300 mm pro F4 - and hopefully I.can pick up a OM-1
You helped me decide - Thanks
I have been in your position Sony or Olympus. One thing I think you should note is that you were using the masterpiece of a lens 150-400mm on the Olympus with mega price point against the much more affordable Sony 200-600mm..I know for sure when doing this kind of comparison just how the lenses effect the results. Thats why a lot of tests on CZcams are rediculous as not enough thought put into getting comparable lenses.. I was a real dedicated Olympus user but took the biggest financial loss in my pro career of 40 years when changing to Sony. I truly hope that Olympus will keep going forward, as tech like Pro Capture and their Image Stabilisation system are so far in front of the competition. Wonderful Images and Video of the birds you managed here..regards.
For a moment there I thought you were going to pick Sony 🤣 I have been watching your videos for couple years now and was a bit sad when you started to use the A1. I have the om1 for about 2 months now don’t even think about switching to another brand fantastic camera the AF is awesome. 👍
Very interesting video. I appreciate your logic and your humor. You have given me a lot to think about, and I like that. Lovely shots of birds, too. Thank you.
Olympus procapture is amazing. I've used it on em1iii with great success.
I just loaded a hand held video of a feeding Heron. EM1X with the 300MM F4h hand held and stable as a rock.
Excellent comparison video with attention to details. I'm a huge fan of the channel. Thanks for sharing.
Surprising choice. I expected the Sony to be a better camera although it seems that OMDS is the preferred market for bird photography. As for the computational stuff I only have the EM1 II and have only used Pro Capture. Never tried any of the other modes. I like that feature and the other cameras I am interested in Fuji have something similar.
I’m so plsd Mike - I was v nervous watching this video. 💫
Good decision! Though I really like Sony, having owned an A9 and A7R4, you are absolutely right about dust on the sensors. I am enjoyng my OM1's and as far as I'm concerned, the OM1 is the best wildlife/macro camera for me, regardless of price. I'm looking forward to your to seeing what you accomplish with it over the next 12 months. I have picked up quite a few tips from you, Andy Rouse, Roger Hance and Derek Forss, and it's marvellous that you all use the OM1.
My Sony A7iii was horrible when it came to sensor dust. I picked up an A1 last December, not sure what Sony changed but I haven't had any sensor dust problems yet.
Well done Mike, now that is over it is upwards and onwards and look forward to your next video - on anything you like :-)
Thanks so much for this very thoughtful and balanced video.
Glad it was helpful!
Well done, Mike. There's one aspect you forgot to talk about: cost- the difference is massive.
Not when you factor in the lens that makes them comparable. The Sony 200-600 is about £1500 and the Oly/OMD 150-400 pro is about £6000.
@@wildcat1065 Given the firmware update for the Sony A1 will be the Sony A1 ii, it would make more sense to put your money into lenses, not bodies; so, in the end, the Sony will still be more expensive IMO.
@@JohnsClicks firmware updates have nothing to do with effective dof, which is what he said and what you ignored... that's typical behavior for m4/3 owners, unfortunately.
@@DragRacingTV What does price have to do with DOF? It seems obvious to me that you'd rather put your money into a great lens. Sony's notorious for not updating their firmware... or doing so with another body. At $5500/ body, it's expensive. Not sure what stereotype of M43 users you're trying to push. He made both points about DOF- having more with M43 and less with FF... and?
@@JohnsClicks of course you don't understand why $2k vs. $7.5k for similar effective dof is a huge difference, and again that's typical for m4/3 owners... we both got it, you didn't... sony has already released three firmware updates for the a1, so you are flat-out lying about that, which is not surprising for an m4/3 owner.
An excellent well thought out video Mike ... even has a devoted Canon R3 user I enjoyed every minute of your internal debate has to your final choice.
All the very best on your photographic journey ... best regards .
Great explanation and reasoning. Btw, the G9 does preshoot mode as well. Looking forward to your OM1 shoots 🍀👍❤️
great critique of your choice ,,,, so much of what you say is why im an olympus fan
Fascinating insight into your camera choice journey Mike. I think it is wise to stick to one system for a good while as you get to learn all the settings, buttons etc and a real sense of what the camera can do. And this is crucial for wildlife photography as you are then well placed to have the correct settings for any scenario that unfolds quickly.
Hi Mike. I am glad you mentioned the outstanding dust reduction on the Olympus and also the Capture Pro feature. When comparing the cameras, did the lens performance (200-600 vs. 150-400 + 1.25 TC) influence your decision? As well as the overall weight and portability?
I was very happy with the optics of both lenses. Weight was not a major influence. Procapture was huge.
Funny, I did the same thing you did, Mike. When Olympus was in the process of selling their camera division, and I needed a newer camera, I wound up buying a Canon EOS R. A couple years later, and after getting my old E-M1 repaired (it's more than six years old now), I almost always pick up the Olympus. I'm pretty sure that I'm going to sell the Canon kit and double down with OMDS.
Hello from Oz. I recently purchased the 100-400mm lens and thought I'd just use it as is before trying out the ProCapture. That's the next step on my agenda. I would love the lens you've been using but the one I bought is lighter and that's important when you have a busted shoulder.
enjoyed the series of videos Mike, a no nonsense critique of both camera bodies and systems, the good, the bad and the ugly, I wish more reviewers were as open and transparent . The Olympus 150-400 is a lens whose performance appears to be vastly superior to the 300 f4 pro by some margin? also, given that its a zoom it obviously more flexible , so....a question if I may, if you were limited in lens choice to just the 300 f4 ( plus TC's) for wildlife would your decision have been be the same? btw, I'm still dithering as to whether to sell the A9ii and 200-600 as my OM1 has not arrived, I'm still using the EM1iii LOL
I'm curious to see Mike's thoughts on your question, too. As someone that has been able to shoot the 300/4 since it debuted and the 150-400 recently, with a friend that owns one, and doing some tests, I would not say the 150-400 is sharper than the 300. But it is AS sharp and has good sharpness at 400 and at 500/5.6 so it brings you magnification that will be a little sharper than the 300+2x and perhaps even to the 300+1.4x with I think better contrast on the 150-400 overall. Maybe someone has done scientific acuity tests that show an edge to one of them over the other, but in practical use, there's no easily noticeable difference in image quality, just as Mike noticed no significant difference between the 50MP A1 and 20MP OM sensors in output when put to blind tests.
The OM-1 will be very easy for you to adapt to from the 1.3 as the button layout is virtually identical with the additional AF button. For everything else you do apart from birds in flight, the two cameras will produce very similar results but the OM-1 will get them much more quickly as it processes several times faster than the 1.3. Things like focus stacking and high res work are now very practical modes to use rather than specialty modes used only on occasion, and as Mike said, ProCapture at 50fps is very practical for smaller faster birds. With the previous models, for small birds, I'd usually just use ProCap H and SAF to try and get several frames at 60fps as they took off or approached a perch because they're too fast for the camera to track. But with OM-1, the SH2 mode at 50fps will actually do a decent job of moving with the birds as they take off toward or away from you.
The 300mm and 150-400mm are both optically fine, but now we have zooms producing very sharp pictures I would not have gone for the OM-1 without it. For years I used Canons, 500, 600 and 800mm lenses and complained every day that I missed pictures because I could not zoom back.
Yes, I find that I shoot wide open for many things any more. The Oly pro lenses areexcellent even wide open. Even the kit lenses are fairly decent.
Good video, thanks...
Glad you liked it!
Fantastic process review. I look forward to more.
I own the Olympus OM-1 couple months ago I rented the sony A1 and honestly the ergonomics are horribles the menu too. But if I have the money to invest in the A1 instead I'll do it with out any hesitation amazing electronic view finder way better autofocus with out mention way less noise reduction capabilities. The ability to crop more with out losing much details in the sony A1 it's awsome, more dynamite range way more derails in the pic 50mp vs 20 mega pixels on the OM-1 its just not enough for 2022. In my opinion. And I love using my Olympus for Weddings.
But for wildlife I want more details in
bird photography for example.
Quite instructive decision making process. Cheers!
I've been using pro capture on small birds in my backyard with the 75-300mm for a long time, it is excellent
An excellent if surprising video. I’m really pleased I opted for the OM1 now all I need is to receive the one ordered in February from WEX Photographic. 😟
Pitty I really would like to have bought your Olympus 150-400😉. Thanks for the great and extensive comparison. I've used the A7 IV, A9 and the A1 on a demo for several hours. I was surprised how good the OM-system keeps up. If you don't need the higher resolution there is no need to switch IMO. None of them feel as comfortable, professional and rugged as the OM-1 for me.
One thing I remember reading is that the m43 filter stack is much thicker than most other systems. That makes dust less visible.
It is not because of this. It is because the top notch sensor cleaning system. The speed and acceleration that the sensor vibrates when you switch the camera on, obliterates the dust.
I never ever had to clean a sensor and I had the em1.2, em1.3 and now OM1
Just one more advantage of having a smaller sensor
@@moisescugat3948 The Panasonic G7, which does not have IBIS presumably does not have a dust shaker as good as Olympus. In my experience with that camera, resistance to visible dust in images was still quite good.
@@ZakWilson that’s fantastic then!! What I am telling is that this camera has a system specifically created for that purpose. And what I can tell you is that I am not careful at all with sensor… it is just not necessary. I change lenses on the beach, or in windy days…
I discovered that photographing swallows head at 10-15 meters on a beach with dried seaweed is hard for my Canon cameras. The cameras really loves the dried seaweed.
I suppose that a beach with dried seaweed serves as a difficult test field for camera auto focus.
Hard choice both have such great features and l do wish my Canon had pro capture.
I was leaning towards OM-1 as well as I already have a Lumix G9 and would like better autofocus. However I think I'm going to wait a few more months to see what the final specs on the Canon R7 is, especially regarding the electronic shutter...being non-stacked sensor will readout speed remain at only 1/60s like the R5 or will they be able to push it to 1/120s. Also whether or not it has some sort of pre-burst function would be the two specs that will weight my decision. If the R7 comes in at under $2500 which I assume it will, combined with the 100-500 4.5-7.1 L that's going to come in $5400 about $4k less than the OM-1 with 150-400 4.5.
Both would be 800mm FF equivalent. In terms of light gathering and depth of field in FF equivalent terms the OM setup will be about 2/3 of a stop faster but the R7 (if rumors are true) will have an extra 12.5mp of resolution to crop in with which is greater reach than the built-in 1.4tc will net.
Excellent review Sir, a serious reason to change brands now, thank you.
Glad to help