looks like the MIT one is the best despite the landing failure, wish they kept working on it, it could been an actual working & safe machine to fly today
The trick is to make the all up mass of the craft a third of the mass of the pilot around 40 to 50 lbs, then with a very fit pilot , you need to pedal like hell to reach a height where your craft can soar using thermals and efficient gliding ratios. Only then will you have a truly practical man powered flying machine. Thus you need to make an extremely lightweight glider that is much lighter than anything around today.
Thema Nummer 1, Schlagflügel Die Idee ist sehr gut, nur nicht identisch nach den Vögel übersetzt, daher wirkungslos. Es ist als ob Sie im Wasser nur hin und her zappeln! Strecken Sie mal ihre Arme aus und die Handfläche ist ihr Flügelprofil. Was machen Sie vor dem Flügelschlag ? Gehen wir mal jeden Schritt durch. 1.) Hochschlag: Sie drehen / stellen die Handfläche gering gegen den Luftstrom, dass Sie Auftrieb in die Handfläche bekommen und heben die Flügel noch geknickt (Elle, Handgelenk) an. 1.a) Beim Vogel verdrehen sich die einzelnen Federkamm (lange Seite) an der hinteren Flügelkante in der Längsachse ganz leicht, damit das Luftpolster zwischen den Federn durchströmen kann, somit gibt es weniger Widerstand in der Aufwärtsbewegung. 2.) Abwärtsschlag: Sie drehen / stellen die Handfläche leicht nach unten geneigt und geben den Auftrieb und den Vorwärtstrieb mit diesem Luftpolster. Die Flügel (Arme) sind gestreckt um größt möglichen Auftrieb zu erhalten. 2.a) Der Federkamm (lange Seite) verschließt und stützt sich jeweils an der nächsten Feder ab. Unten am Umkehrpunkt schwingt die Vogelfeder verzögert nach und erzeugt durch diese Nachfederung einen zusätzlichen Vorschub. 1.a) und 2.a) braucht im Flugzeugbau natürlich wegen des zu hohen Aufwand nicht übersetzt werden. 3.) Mit dem bekannten Flügel-Profil ist der Rest nur Segelflug. Die Firma Festo war an dieser Entwicklungsübersetzung von Ihrer „Möve“ sehr nah dran ! Es fehlte nur noch die wechselnden Flügelanstellwinkel, - Schade!
I am fascinated by the concept of the ornithopter, but I have to correct you on one point. The Snowbird is not an ornithopter. It doesn't operate by flapping its wings like a bird. Technically it is a man powered sailplane.
Because it is so cool. It is technically a class 2 hang glider, along with the more common Adrienne Swift Light. It is able to be foot launched, but not foot or human powered one airborne.
@@alanaldpal950 I'm very familiar with the ARCHAEOPTERYX, the SWIFT, the SWIFT Lite, and the Millennium (which I used to own). And none are human powered, no matter how cool they are.
@@Rick_Cavallaro Hello Rick, I have a Brightstar Swift, and would like to buy one of Ruperts Archaeopteryx as soon as I can find $100K+ in loose change. As you know, They can be foot launched (human power) from a slope/mountain but can not launch or climb from level gound from Human power alone. I bet you regret selling your millennium.
@@alanaldpal950 I do kind of regret selling the Millennium. I bought it brand new for $6500. I can hardly imagine spending $100k for an Archaeopteryx when you can buy most very respectable sailplanes, with much higher performance, for much less than that. Even the SWIFT is on par with the Archaeopteryx for a fraction of the price, and can also be foot launched. But saying an aircraft is human powered because it can be foot launched is more than an enormous stretch. I've worked on aircraft that are actually human powered, and it could hardly be more different.
Pity you have omitted the Newbury Manflier, created by Nick Goodhart in the late 1970s, and flown by two people (including me on one memorable occasion). It was stationed at Greenham Common airfield (near Newbury, England) but then had to leave because of the coming of cruise missiles there. Its design was quite different from the other ones shown, approximating to two aircraft joined at the wingtips.
It would be cool to have the kilograms and meters equivalent of those values aswell, it will help to figure things out better for the people used to those scales. Very interesting videos, keep the good work.
I have corresponded by email with Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo, the physiologist who did the physical training program for the pilot of the Gossamer planes (Condor and Albatross). He even sent me a team T-shirt! I think we should be working on designs that don't stick to the pure human power regulations of the Kremer prize, but like a couple of those seen here use things like towing or launching from a hill; and also they don't need to fly very much. Then they could be sturdier, with shorter wings, and easier to manage. Just something to give ordinary people the feeling of getting into the air a little without using a noisy engine, nor flying way high like sailplanes or many hang gliders. Studying the giant pterosaurs such as Quetzalcoatlus or the giant teratorn birds might be helpful, and also some of the early hang gliding work such as that of Lilienthal and Octave Chanute.
I love your video. It has informative content relevant to the subject and did not waste time with unessessary garbage. Such a pleasant change from all the other crap on u tube.
Not aircraft, but pedal powered, in 2015 I came up with a design for a 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steer pedal kart. The design is unlike anything else I have seen. I built the frame for my rough prototype in 2016 but haven’t been able to finish it because of a battle with Lyme disease. I’m getting rid of excess equipment and paying down credit cards and hopefully I can finish this prototype soon.
#1? It hasn't been tried yet? To me, that concept is interesting, and is theoretically very possible, as it is similar to the skipper, hydrofoil bike, and functions by up and down pumping using the riders weight and the flexing of a main wing. Also, surfers like Kai Lenny have learned how to pump fixed wing hydrofoil surfboards by using their legs, arms, and torque throughout their entire body to pump the board while standing on top of it, as seen on numerous yt videos. But the major difference is, that they have the wing under water and the craft and their bodies are in the air. Water, below the interface, doesn't compress, is dense, and yet is still fluid, so that lift is probably over a hundred times easier in water, while the human's drag factor by comparison is zero. So, the surfboard hydrofoil has only about a 3 foot wing span and the skipper hydrofoil waterbike is about 4 feet. The problem I see with this last human powered flight craft is that the drag on the human standing vertically could be too significant to allow the plane to be pumped along in flight, unless they build an aerodynamic canopy around the pilot, as in the other aircraft shown. The pilot might also get more propulsion standing like a surfer so they can use every ounce of their body and limbs for torque propulsion. And maybe even having a more compact geometry to the whole rig.
I have high hopes for number two the jumping style craft, though I imagine the pedal assist types will be more reliable. When the Jinker is finished I hope that we will be able to catch a glimpse of such an innovative craft! Thank you for compiling this comprehensive list for us. Lastly how much do you think humidity levels and available oxygen content plays in the role of sustaining human powered flight? I mean a pedaling pilot working so hard right next to oxygen depleting automotorists (car-drivers) might be working in self defeating conditions?
Motor Universal Axial-Coaxial The proposed invention is the engine, which bases its operation on the magnetic repulsion and the increase of the magnetic field by concentration of the lines of force. It is composed of rotating discs, which can rotate in the same direction, or in the opposite direction (counter-revolution). The discs contain permanent magnets (neodymium) that follow the rotating magnetic field, generated by the stator. It has a variable number of coils according to the revolutions or power that you wish to obtain. The rotation control is carried out by means of a magnetic field detector (hall) with electronic position control.
The invention was presented on INTERNATIONAL FAIR OF GENEVA INVENTIONS (47e SALON INTERNATIONAL DES INVENTIONS DE GENÈVE), held on April 10-14, 2019, and where it was awarded by the International Jury. The status of a patent application is pending and being prepared for publishing (the number is PCT/ES2019/070242). Current invention is the improved version and based on patents MAGNETIC DEVICE SUITABLE FOR USE AS A POWER GENERATOR OR DRIVE MOTOR (PCT/ES2017/070321; published) and MAGNETIC DEVICE APPLICABLE AS A POWER GENERATOR OR AS A DRIVE MOTOR (PCT/ES2019070369; awaiting for publishing). The proposed invention can be used in such industries as aircrafts, robotics, transportation, aeration and as electricity generator. Details and contacts: magnetarplus.com/#contact
I have an idea for a lifting force machine. Step 1: Get hollowed out cube. Step 2: Securely attach magnet to inner bottom of hollowed out cube. Step 3: Place a lever on inside bottom of cube behind the magnet that's securely attached to inside bottom of cube so that one side of the lever is pointing towards you and hanging over the magnet. Step 4: Attach a vertical bar to the top side of the part of the lever that is not hanging over magnet witch is securely attached to inner bottom of cube. Make sure the bar goes all the way up to the inner top of the cube barley touching it. Step 5: Securely attach a magnet to the side of the lever that is hanging over the magnet that is attached to the inner bottom of cube. Note: Magnets need to be facing each other with attracting poles N,S or S,N Note: The lever is going to have to be really close to the magnet on inner bottom of cube because of how close those magnetic fields need to be to interact. But not so close that magnets can touch. The magnet on top connected to lever is pulling the magnet on inner bottom of cube towards it and since the magnet on inner bottom of cube is connected to cube, this pulling force acts as a lifting force. Now at the same time the magnet on inner bottom of cube is pulling the magnet on top downwards BUT the magnet on top is connected to the lever so any downwards pulling force is being converted mechanically by the lever into upwards lifting force. Now if you know anything about magnets you now that there are magnets powerfull enough to lift far more weight then just there own. So essentialy this divice is exploiting the powerfull pulling force of magnets by mechanicaly transforming its magnetic pulling force into mechanical lifting force through the clever utilization of a lever, and walla stuff can be made to fly. Imagine if the magnets in this experiment where electro magnets so the ammount of electrical current going into them determined the ammount of lifting force that it would have. Now imagine this system being used as an attachment that could be placed under or ontop of vehicles to counter the weight of the vehicle and any cargo its carying. Now imagine if this was done with powerfull permanent magnets and turned sideways and placed in an electric generator and had enough strength to pass through the magnetic fields as it propelled itself forwards with its own magnetic pulling force. Signed AMA
A lot of these follow the same design, and a lot feature bicycles. I personally propose something that hasn’t been featured here... rowing machines! Anybody who has used a rowing machine at the gym (or a racing boat on the water) can tell you that it’s a full body motion and is a lot more efficient than a bicycle. In fact, using the calorie counter on both machines at my local gym as a bench mark, rowing is about 30% more efficient than cycling. Perhaps this could be an interesting spin on the common bike model?
I'm surprised that 20 Archaeoptrix have been sold, since the base model is over 100K US... Oh, and the Jinker has already failed several time. It won't work.
I don't consider being towed or using a gas bag as human powered flight. I know their have been flights for super short/low distances by peddling and that is as close as it gets, I guess.
In the future, I'd like you to include the zwhite Dwarf, 45' long, 27' tall. Designed and built bt one of Burt Ratan's sons for Gallagher the commedian to connect with his audience in a different way, it now resides in a WWII hager north of central Oregon.
Infelizmente a última criação no vídeo só houve simulação computadorizada. Eu acho que é só um sonho que ainda não foi realizado. Adorei muito este vídeo, pois sou amante do voo. parabens! !!!.
Archaeopteryx is NOT a human powered aircraft. It can't be included in this video! It is one of the best foot launched hill or mountain gliders-sailplanes. Good work on the rest of the video btw...
When I was younger I wanted to build something similar to jinker flapping wing.. I wonder if there is a way to strap your self in? Looks like you could fall out pretty easily! Awesome Video!
Maybe I'm biased because I went to Southampton University, but shouldn't Southampton University's Man-Powered Aircraft be on the list, being the first verified human powered aircraft ever? Also I feel the Jinker should be an honorable mention, seeing as it hadn't ever flown.
archeopteryx means PRIMAL-EARLY (but not the first) wing and not first wing. otherwise it would have been named protopteryx archeo- pteryx ΑΡΧΑΙO- ΠΤΕΡΥΞ p.s. dont roast me quarantine is really hitting me
#8 doesnt make sense. Its not a human powered craft it showed the craft being towed by a car to take off. It does t seem that the wing flex isnt giving it thrust at all.
Hello, Tamer Başpınar If you enjoyed this video check out or aircraft playlist. czcams.com/play/PLJmAwjBwlfgJoaBSF5f9kpTqENoeY246i.html Thanks for watching!
I have read of a monk who flew from a high part of the monastery. He discovered he did not have a tail but was forbidden by his abbot so he hobbled around for the rest of his life,
Errors (running and walking) Running and walking on a flat surface helps to get rid of the problems of ligaments and tensile tension and gives the full opportunity for running and walking The surface of the simplified needs a simplified body
This reminds me of the time I tried to patent my "water transport tube" I got a letter back that read only 3 words,,, "ITS A HOSE" . I said all that to say this THESE ARE GLIDERS
YOU HAVE TO LIKE THIS VIDEO AND ADMIRE THE PEOPLE THAT MAKE THESE INVENTIONS AND TRY THEM OUT AT GREAT RISK. LIKED THIS ALOT
looks like the MIT one is the best despite the landing failure, wish they kept working on it, it could been an actual working & safe machine to fly today
Not a single bit of footage of that first craft actually flapping its wings.
These is flying video
The second one is a prime example of innovation is a prime example of taking a technology and smacking it back into the Stone Age
Lmao and really needs to stay under the rock it crawled out of only to make mistakes unforgivin
Not sure why a craft that hasn't flown is No. 1 when there are two record breakers in the list.
That was all good. Thanks for posting. Number 1 shouldn’t be listed at all in my opinion.
3 was electric as well idk if they admitted it but you can clearly see the mid drive e bike motor pedal assembly.
@@mikeyavorshak5873 and 4 is just a footlaunched glider lmao
The last one is great
The trick is to make the all up mass of the craft a third of the mass of the pilot around 40 to 50 lbs, then with a very fit pilot , you need to pedal like hell to reach a height where your craft can soar using thermals and efficient gliding ratios. Only then will you have a truly practical man powered flying machine. Thus you need to make an extremely lightweight glider that is much lighter than anything around today.
I feel like the number one human powered flying machine should be something that's, you know, flown.
I love how they all have the wing span of a commercial passenger jet.
They have to.. because human power is weak compared to even the simplest gas engine
Or just completely bored and in need of entertainment?
I used to dream about these as a kid
👋
I remember seeing a giant human powered quadcopter. Thought that one would make the list.
The number one is completely impossible... 😬👍🏻
Now that’s thinking outside the box folks.
Gregory is it now. I've got nothing cause u are not worth it to me anymore
Martha Hansen 🤷🏿♀️you’re Joshing me right lollol
Thema Nummer 1, Schlagflügel
Die Idee ist sehr gut, nur nicht identisch nach den Vögel übersetzt, daher wirkungslos. Es ist als ob Sie im Wasser nur hin und her zappeln!
Strecken Sie mal ihre Arme aus und die Handfläche ist ihr Flügelprofil. Was machen Sie vor dem Flügelschlag ? Gehen wir mal jeden Schritt durch.
1.) Hochschlag:
Sie drehen / stellen die Handfläche gering gegen den Luftstrom, dass Sie Auftrieb in die Handfläche bekommen und heben die Flügel noch geknickt (Elle, Handgelenk) an.
1.a) Beim Vogel verdrehen sich die einzelnen Federkamm (lange Seite) an der hinteren Flügelkante in der Längsachse ganz leicht, damit das Luftpolster zwischen den Federn durchströmen kann, somit gibt es weniger Widerstand in der Aufwärtsbewegung.
2.) Abwärtsschlag:
Sie drehen / stellen die Handfläche leicht nach unten geneigt und geben den Auftrieb und den Vorwärtstrieb mit diesem Luftpolster. Die Flügel (Arme) sind gestreckt um größt möglichen Auftrieb zu erhalten.
2.a) Der Federkamm (lange Seite) verschließt und stützt sich jeweils an der nächsten Feder ab. Unten am Umkehrpunkt schwingt die Vogelfeder verzögert nach und erzeugt durch diese Nachfederung einen zusätzlichen Vorschub.
1.a) und 2.a) braucht im Flugzeugbau natürlich wegen des zu hohen Aufwand nicht übersetzt werden.
3.) Mit dem bekannten Flügel-Profil ist der Rest nur Segelflug.
Die Firma Festo war an dieser Entwicklungsübersetzung von Ihrer „Möve“ sehr nah dran ! Es fehlte nur noch die wechselnden Flügelanstellwinkel, - Schade!
Great
I am fascinated by the concept of the ornithopter, but I have to correct you on one point. The Snowbird is not an ornithopter. It doesn't operate by flapping its wings like a bird. Technically it is a man powered sailplane.
How did the ARCHAEOPTERYX end up on a list of human powered aircraft?
Because it is so cool. It is technically a class 2 hang glider, along with the more common Adrienne Swift Light. It is able to be foot launched, but not foot or human powered one airborne.
@@alanaldpal950 I'm very familiar with the ARCHAEOPTERYX, the SWIFT, the SWIFT Lite, and the Millennium (which I used to own). And none are human powered, no matter how cool they are.
@@Rick_Cavallaro Hello Rick, I have a Brightstar Swift, and would like to buy one of Ruperts Archaeopteryx as soon as I can find $100K+ in loose change. As you know, They can be foot launched (human power) from a slope/mountain but can not launch or climb from level gound from Human power alone. I bet you regret selling your millennium.
@@alanaldpal950 I do kind of regret selling the Millennium. I bought it brand new for $6500. I can hardly imagine spending $100k for an Archaeopteryx when you can buy most very respectable sailplanes, with much higher performance, for much less than that. Even the SWIFT is on par with the Archaeopteryx for a fraction of the price, and can also be foot launched. But saying an aircraft is human powered because it can be foot launched is more than an enormous stretch. I've worked on aircraft that are actually human powered, and it could hardly be more different.
the one with legs,has got to be the best.
"Jinker" won't fly because its wing doesn't move in proper (bird) manner. It's a pity, but bird's wings movement is MUCH more complicated.
Pity you have omitted the Newbury Manflier, created by Nick Goodhart in the late 1970s, and flown by two people (including me on one memorable occasion). It was stationed at Greenham Common airfield (near Newbury, England) but then had to leave because of the coming of cruise missiles there. Its design was quite different from the other ones shown, approximating to two aircraft joined at the wingtips.
Oh very cool sir I wish I had known that making this list. I'll have you in mind the next time I create another video in this category.
My husband is a dingleberry mansplaner. He flies, too. But different...
Oh must have seen my friend but wrong about joined hip. And if I see the flight I will use it as a clay pigeon
Anything relating to science should be reported in the metric system. That’s what real science uses.
If I had money I would continue this
“The day dallas aircraft” lol
That was a wtf moment for me too.
Dädalus*
I was expecting him to say Ee-kay-roos
An informative video without a robot voice? Gasp!
Lmfao indeed
The air planes need awheels that will be extended to the ground with some kind of suspension to make the landing easy
That would increase weight and drag too much. These machines are already hard to get off the ground
Make a crank powered play with a propeller on the front that powers it
The one that only goes 5 ft is only one id fly in i think any higher is crazy
Sooooo....
This is essentially an ad for a kickstarter project??? 🧐
Hell No I'm just playing Brandon
#2 is really #1
Number 7 is an Idea of jules Verne!!
It would be cool to have the kilograms and meters equivalent of those values aswell, it will help to figure things out better for the people used to those scales. Very interesting videos, keep the good work.
Huh are u talking babycake scales
I have corresponded by email with Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo, the physiologist who did the physical training program for the pilot of the Gossamer planes (Condor and Albatross). He even sent me a team T-shirt! I think we should be working on designs that don't stick to the pure human power regulations of the Kremer prize, but like a couple of those seen here use things like towing or launching from a hill; and also they don't need to fly very much. Then they could be sturdier, with shorter wings, and easier to manage. Just something to give ordinary people the feeling of getting into the air a little without using a noisy engine, nor flying way high like sailplanes or many hang gliders. Studying the giant pterosaurs such as Quetzalcoatlus or the giant teratorn birds might be helpful, and also some of the early hang gliding work such as that of Lilienthal and Octave Chanute.
Those are so cool and yet insane. I like them
Wow! Like flying a paper airplane.
Now try to do something with spitwads.
I love your video. It has informative content relevant to the subject and did not waste time with unessessary garbage. Such a pleasant change from all the other crap on u tube.
The Archeopteryx is pretty cool.
I wonder who else like me, thinks to have a better idea but no money to even try to build a prototype
Follow your dreams!
Number 4 Ruppert aecheopteryx is the best
Pretty cool,but still nothing better than a paramotor :)
Not aircraft, but pedal powered, in 2015 I came up with a design for a 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steer pedal kart. The design is unlike anything else I have seen. I built the frame for my rough prototype in 2016 but haven’t been able to finish it because of a battle with Lyme disease. I’m getting rid of excess equipment and paying down credit cards and hopefully I can finish this prototype soon.
Number 1 Don't try to do a loop de loop. It will be your first one but also your last. :)
That last idea should be called Death Dive.
Human powered air machines will be wonderful
Cool video! TIL that the Gossamer Albatross wasn't the only human-powered airplane of its kind. So many incredible machines!
I LIKE #4 its only using you foot
Wtf where are u
Interesting !
#1? It hasn't been tried yet? To me, that concept is interesting, and is theoretically very possible, as it is similar to the skipper, hydrofoil bike, and functions by up and down pumping using the riders weight and the flexing of a main wing. Also, surfers like Kai Lenny have learned how to pump fixed wing hydrofoil surfboards by using their legs, arms, and torque throughout their entire body to pump the board while standing on top of it, as seen on numerous yt videos. But the major difference is, that they have the wing under water and the craft and their bodies are in the air. Water, below the interface, doesn't compress, is dense, and yet is still fluid, so that lift is probably over a hundred times easier in water, while the human's drag factor by comparison is zero. So, the surfboard hydrofoil has only about a 3 foot wing span and the skipper hydrofoil waterbike is about 4 feet. The problem I see with this last human powered flight craft is that the drag on the human standing vertically could be too significant to allow the plane to be pumped along in flight, unless they build an aerodynamic canopy around the pilot, as in the other aircraft shown. The pilot might also get more propulsion standing like a surfer so they can use every ounce of their body and limbs for torque propulsion. And maybe even having a more compact geometry to the whole rig.
The Snowbird didn’t flap its wings as stated. The airship type craft are not flying, just floating.
I have high hopes for number two the jumping style craft, though I imagine the pedal assist types will be more reliable. When the Jinker is finished I hope that we will be able to catch a glimpse of such an innovative craft! Thank you for compiling this comprehensive list for us.
Lastly how much do you think humidity levels and available oxygen content plays in the role of sustaining human powered flight? I mean a pedaling pilot working so hard right next to oxygen depleting automotorists (car-drivers) might be working in self defeating conditions?
Lol Na
Day Dallas. OMG dude
I can’t see why number four was included as it is just an elaborate glider and not human powered like the others.
Cool stuff!
Motor Universal Axial-Coaxial
The proposed invention is the engine, which bases its operation on the magnetic repulsion and the increase of the magnetic field by concentration of the lines of force. It is composed of rotating discs, which can rotate in the same direction, or in the opposite direction (counter-revolution). The discs contain permanent magnets (neodymium) that follow the rotating magnetic field, generated by the stator. It has a variable number of coils according to the revolutions or power that you wish to obtain. The rotation control is carried out by means of a magnetic field detector (hall) with electronic position control.
The invention was presented on INTERNATIONAL FAIR OF GENEVA INVENTIONS (47e SALON INTERNATIONAL DES INVENTIONS DE GENÈVE), held on April 10-14, 2019, and where it was awarded by the International Jury.
The status of a patent application is pending and being prepared for publishing (the number is PCT/ES2019/070242). Current invention is the improved version and based on patents MAGNETIC DEVICE SUITABLE FOR USE AS A POWER GENERATOR OR DRIVE MOTOR (PCT/ES2017/070321; published) and MAGNETIC DEVICE APPLICABLE AS A POWER GENERATOR OR AS A DRIVE MOTOR (PCT/ES2019070369; awaiting for publishing).
The proposed invention can be used in such industries as aircrafts, robotics, transportation, aeration and as electricity generator.
Details and contacts: magnetarplus.com/#contact
Awsome.
Can you believe the guy is called Proudfoot?!? 4:00
I have an idea for a lifting force machine.
Step 1: Get hollowed out cube.
Step 2: Securely attach magnet to inner bottom of hollowed out cube.
Step 3: Place a lever on inside bottom of cube behind the magnet that's securely attached to inside bottom of cube so that one side of the lever is pointing towards you and hanging over the magnet.
Step 4: Attach a vertical bar to the top side of the part of the lever that is not hanging over magnet witch is securely attached to inner bottom of cube. Make sure the bar goes all the way up to the inner top of the cube barley touching it.
Step 5: Securely attach a magnet to the side of the lever that is hanging over the magnet that is attached to the inner bottom of cube.
Note: Magnets need to be facing each other with attracting poles N,S or S,N
Note: The lever is going to have to be really close to the magnet on inner bottom of cube because of how close those magnetic fields need to be to interact. But not so close that magnets can touch.
The magnet on top connected to lever is pulling the magnet on inner bottom of cube towards it and since the magnet on inner bottom of cube is connected to cube, this pulling force acts as a lifting force. Now at the same time the magnet on inner bottom of cube is pulling the magnet on top downwards BUT the magnet on top is connected to the lever so any downwards pulling force is being converted mechanically by the lever into upwards lifting force. Now if you know anything about magnets you now that there are magnets powerfull enough to lift far more weight then just there own. So essentialy this divice is exploiting the powerfull pulling force of magnets by mechanicaly transforming its magnetic pulling force into mechanical lifting force through the clever utilization of a lever, and walla stuff can be made to fly. Imagine if the magnets in this experiment where electro magnets so the ammount of electrical current going into them determined the ammount of lifting force that it would have. Now imagine this system being used as an attachment that could be placed under or ontop of vehicles to counter the weight of the vehicle and any cargo its carying. Now imagine if this was done with powerfull permanent magnets and turned sideways and placed in an electric generator and had enough strength to pass through the magnetic fields as it propelled itself forwards with its own magnetic pulling force. Signed AMA
Jinker looks like a sinker.
# 4 should be #1
How number 1 is a plane that isn't built yet?
Top like 👍🌍🇧🇷
last one is funny
Formidabile veramente geniale
A lot of these follow the same design, and a lot feature bicycles. I personally propose something that hasn’t been featured here... rowing machines! Anybody who has used a rowing machine at the gym (or a racing boat on the water) can tell you that it’s a full body motion and is a lot more efficient than a bicycle. In fact, using the calorie counter on both machines at my local gym as a bench mark, rowing is about 30% more efficient than cycling. Perhaps this could be an interesting spin on the common bike model?
I've had the very same thought!
Wtf ok I'm am going to have to get my witch on
I'm surprised that 20 Archaeoptrix have been sold, since the base model is over 100K US...
Oh, and the Jinker has already failed several time. It won't work.
Love it
The very first aircraft flaps it's wings yet you don't show it? And how is #4 Human powered? It might as well be a hang glider...
You can see it being pulled by a car on a line to fly, it is a glider 😂
Ah my awesome husband bought me oh wait I'm sure u have already seen pics
I don't consider being towed or using a gas bag as human powered flight. I know their have been flights for super short/low distances by peddling and that is as close as it gets, I guess.
there is a difference between launch and flight
Yeah like the greenbacks that give life!!!!
Brazil
Day Dallas
fu..! you scared me in 01:37 - I thought my mobile's screen was broken!
Interesting video though!
Lol 😂 😂 😂
That little ballon scared ya huh?
I. Chamberlain ??? He was talking about the large rope that looked like a crack
The other option is becoming a saint; like St. Joseph of Cupertino. 😁
Bruh the voice over kept cutting between my left and right ear bud and kept getting scruffy but the background music was fine
I like the jinker
In the future, I'd like you to include the zwhite Dwarf, 45' long, 27' tall. Designed and built bt one of Burt Ratan's sons for Gallagher the commedian to connect with his audience in a different way, it now resides in a WWII hager north of central Oregon.
What are feet and inches? Please use meters
Say Day-Dallas one more time, I dare you!
Infelizmente a última criação no vídeo só houve simulação computadorizada. Eu acho que é só um sonho que ainda não foi realizado. Adorei muito este vídeo, pois sou amante do voo. parabens! !!!.
*pause* Day-Duh-lus... Daedalus... continue
Ae says ee.
I woulda love the first of
Yo-yo plane? Interesting himmm..
Just wondering... wouldn't a biplane or triplane wing configuration be more sensible?
Archaeopteryx is NOT a human powered aircraft. It can't be included in this video! It is one of the best foot launched hill or mountain gliders-sailplanes. Good work on the rest of the video btw...
When I was younger I wanted to build something similar to jinker flapping wing.. I wonder if there is a way to strap your self in? Looks like you could fall out pretty easily! Awesome Video!
brandon nemeth thajmytajmàhàlahal the thajmahal
Stroke
Brandon roof climber that crashed
Welp, I’m flying from North Carolina to San Diego in one of these next year
Wow will you be in baggage hold?I'm thinking there is NO room in 1st class
Maybe I'm biased because I went to Southampton University, but shouldn't Southampton University's Man-Powered Aircraft be on the list, being the first verified human powered aircraft ever? Also I feel the Jinker should be an honorable mention, seeing as it hadn't ever flown.
ae, a legenda ta top demais, mas poderia mostrar as medidas no SI (entre parentesis)! eh noixx
Some of these should be test with altitud gear and parachuta instead of a lengthy resistance flight... or not...
great robot voice till Daedalus
archeopteryx means PRIMAL-EARLY (but not the first) wing and not first wing. otherwise it would have been named protopteryx
archeo- pteryx ΑΡΧΑΙO- ΠΤΕΡΥΞ
p.s. dont roast me quarantine is really hitting me
#8 doesnt make sense. Its not a human powered craft it showed the craft being towed by a car to take off. It does t seem that the wing flex isnt giving it thrust at all.
He picked footage of it not flying under its own power, but it does exist: czcams.com/video/DM9GJ3JOJv0/video.html
Interesting would need to see to believe
4th s perfect
Hello, Tamer Başpınar If you enjoyed this video check out or aircraft playlist.
czcams.com/play/PLJmAwjBwlfgJoaBSF5f9kpTqENoeY246i.html
Thanks for watching!
Where does number 1 flap its wings?
I have read of a monk who flew from a high part of the monastery. He discovered he did not have a tail but was forbidden by his abbot so he hobbled around for the rest of his life,
Does burning mummies count as human powered?
I don’t see number 8 flapping like described.
Errors (running and walking) Running and walking on a flat surface helps to get rid of the problems of ligaments and tensile tension and gives the full opportunity for running and walking The surface of the simplified needs a simplified body
by the structure of Jinker, it is obvious that it won't ever fly and should not be listed in this video
How was #8 human powered if it was being pulled by the car like a kite
I think it was just to get him airborne.... If it's configured for flapping I think he is not able to do it in his own
This reminds me of the time I tried to patent my "water transport tube" I got a letter back that read only 3 words,,, "ITS A HOSE" . I said all that to say this THESE ARE GLIDERS