MUSLIM DEBATES UNIVERSITY STUDENT | Atheist Challenges God’s Existence
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 06. 2024
- The Debate Continues!
Chemistry Major vs. Muslim PART II
Can the universe be explained by entropy and equilibrium?
#TheExistenceProject encountered a no-nonsense chemistry major in the heart of Texas University. “I say there’s a UNICORN in the sky. Prove ME wrong!”
What emerged was a fantastic debate, filled with science, laughs, and real discussions about our existence!
Watch the rest of the series here!: • God Exists
STAY TUNED for more conversations like this! Because if you exist, you’re part of this too.
Check out our other Social Media Channels:
Twitter: / reviewreligions
Instagram: / reviewreligions
Facebook: / thereviewofreligions
Official Website:
www.reviewofreligions.org/ - Krátké a kreslené filmy
That sigh came from deep in his soul...lol
This was so fun to watch. An excellent example of how to carry out a respectful conversation with someone who completely disagrees with you!
“Were they created by nothing, or were they creators of themselves? Did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain” (Quran 52:35-36)
I'll say it every time. DO NOT STOP. ❤
i can genuinely binge watch this series for days on end. so much spiritual and intellectual value to be gained from these videos!
MashaAllah amazing content! This is phenomenal.
I think the guy was much more sincere as the conversation went on.
Wow, I have never met any (non religious) adult here who knew the significance of Baghdad in history. This gentleman read about it as a child!!
Such a striking and enjoyable contrast between Parts 1 & 2 of this conversation! The student’s genuine inquisition and considered thinking facilitated far greater depth of discussion than mere fables. The reflective pauses in the video edit really helped convey this. As for Mr ‘toaster in the sky’, it seems someone’s holding a grudge over a burnt weekly fry-up…
The toaster will have some explaining to do lol. Can’t wait for the next video!
This channel is so underated, no debate just a friendly conversation with calm voice no emotional explosions. This is the way to understand and learn
Both of these men are so intelligent. They kept up with the conversation really well and brought up a lot of good points. I’ve been watching this in 2x speed, highly recommend lolol. Also, I audibly laughed at “I have a toaster”, I was clueless on how it fit into the convo 😂
I’m loving this 🙏🏼
Great video! Looking forward to the next one
Keep these videos coming please
A very satisfying conclusion alhumdolillah!!
These conversations are so important, I am glad these are being recorded and shared with the world. God bless the RoR team, keep up the good work.
Mash'Allah amazing!! Once again excited for the next debate! Jazak'Allah
Another respectful & effective discussion. The guy's sweater is kinda him -- seems aggressive at times but is actually quite kind & just passionate about what he believes lol. I really appreciate the last comment he shared about the golden age of Islam & science -- nice way to build bridges.
That toaster guy in the end made me shake my head in confusion and disappointment lol
Mashallah, he tried his best but seemed to give up hope halfway through...
You are an example thank you for the good work machallah
Amazing dicussion as always, I look forward to RoR uploads so much. Keep these coming. Super respectful and pateint Murabbi Sb.
4:39 😂
this is my favorite one so far! enjoying the content
Excellent continuity of the conversation. again commendable discussion.
the debate was ended when he said : it takes intelligence to create an order. While the other guy was trying to proove there is no intellgince behind universe
Beautiful ending, the guy calmed down and looked almost convinced about existence of God
Always the teaser at the end. His wife didn’t even know what’s about to happen with the toaster
Do not get the evolution argument, if randomness is a thing at play, show it, demonstrate it
Lol, Haha i want to order that toaster. A toaster orbiting the sun? That's the kind of fantastic appliance I'd order. 'Perfectly toasts bread at 93 million miles away!😂
The ending omg 😂😂😂 !!
Hope this Channel keeps growing
MashaAllah very nicely done
Allahumma Baarik
Thank you for making me fall in love with God over and over and over again. I pray that may your efforts be blessed. May you plant the seed of love for Allah and the curiosity to search. A million Amen. More please.
The interviewer has an incredibly calm demeanour, it's actually quite impressive.
Great conversation! At first he was a bit wierd, socially challenged. But then when he calmed himself down and wasnt rude, the conversation was much better.
As for the arab man at the end, i feel sorry for him. To reach such an age and still use illogical arguements about god such as a toaster is childish and dissapointing..
Wow, this is a superb and fruitful conversation. Love it.
First unicorn 🦄 now flying toaster 😅...bit tricky to prove 😂 what's wrong with people these days 😓
Can't wait for more episodes
May Allah bless you all and keep you all under his protection 🤲🏼
In the first part he did not want to lose…….In the second part he lost everything
Keep making duas
Just flip it...*Imam sahib proceeds to flip the sign* Cheeky! 😂 A very entertaining conversation, full of facts & maturity! Our Imam sahib has a plethora of patience. Looking forward to the toaster chronicles 🤭 Allahumma Barik ROR team!
I learned and enjoyed the conversation.
There's a creator, that is the entire purpose of this discussion. Design and function cannot exist without intention and by sheer probability, Period.
Will be back to hear about the toaster.
Bro said entropy and equilibrium was easily explainable
❤❤i love this conversation bro ❤❤ you go cool mind❤❤
ما شاء الله سبحان الله
جَزَاکَمُ اللّٰہ اَحْسَنَ الْجَزَاء Murabbi Sahib
This man seems very disturbed and must have gone through some rough times where he had lost the belief but a kind gesture and polite manner will make him realise the need of a creator .
Wonderfully carried
He has confused between possibilities and probabilities😂
Simple question to that Muslim guy who is debating: What is the distance between you and heaven, hell? Answer in either miles or km, your choice.
Hint: Use the conversion factor 1 mile = 1.6 km.
This guy is soft-peddling Islam. He is just gish-galloping a clearly exhausted fellow who stopped for a second, and said he just wanted to go home, but got caught up in this discussion. The Islamic guy says Islam champions science. If it champions science, how could it possibly end up with the conclusion that a God must exist. The answer must be that we don't know if a God exists. Science can only measure the material world, not anything supernatural. So science cannot determine if a God exists or doesn't exist. He ends up saying that we must ask God if he exists. But how do we know if God answers us?
Amazing
the guy got tired and sat down 😭
Amazing argument
Bro dissipated a lot of energy to declare his confusion. He could’ve simply said: I’m confused 😕
May Allah SWT bless and reward the people with the highest knowledge. Indeed Allah grants knowledge whomever He wills and for those who seeks it. Allahu Akbar
Baghdad you beauty ❤😅
Nice
This just proves people want their opinion challenged, or challenge others and that people thirst for their view of life to be heard.
He became even more sincere as the conversation went on. May Allah guide him.
3 minutes in and the atheist just throwing anything out of the thin air...
NAHH this is tooo good 😂😂
Long live the toaster!
Where is the toaster guy?
Once upon a time there was a Spider and the Fly😊😊😊
May Allah grant you jannatul firdaus
Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._*
And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality.
1. I personally have never observed a god.
2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god.
3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
4. I have never encountered any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality.
5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true.
6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._
ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god.
I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
I welcome any cordial response. Peace.
Lol just 1.5 min and atheists guy lose his credibility 😂
Burden of proof is on the believer
First
I've said this before and will say it again. Speaking as a mathematican, Athest know nothing about what science actually is and instead of getting passed there Childhood tramour caused by Christianity they then bucket islam into that....not realising islam gave them the belief they belive with (starting in muslim Spain - the greeks where just Phylosphers and got a lot wrong, this is why in acedmia we make a distinction on these time periods e.g. HW Turnbul the great mathematicians). We should instead aproche these people with the character of the prophet (sw) as they can look up the evidance.
Hello. I am an atheist. I define atheism as suspending any acknowledgment as to the reality of any particular god until sufficient credible evidence is presented. My position is that *_I currently have no good reason to acknowledge the reality of any god._*
And here is why I currently hold to such a position. Below are 10 facts I must consider when evaluating the claim made by certain theists that a particular god exists in reality. To be clear, these are not premises for any argument which _concludes_ there to be no gods. These are simply facts I must take into account when evaluating the verity of such a claim. If any of the following facts were to be contravened at a later time by evidence, experience, or sound argument, I would THEN have good reason to acknowledge such a reality.
1. I personally have never observed a god.
2. I have never encountered any person who has claimed to have observed a god.
3. I know of no accounts of persons claiming to have observed a god that were willing or able to demonstrate or verify their observation for authenticity, accuracy, or validity.
4. I have never encountered any _valid_ logical argument, which also introduced demonstrably true premises that lead deductively to an inevitable conclusion that a god(s) exists in reality.
5. Of the many logical syllogisms I have examined arguing for the reality of a god(s), I have found all to contain a formal or informal logical fallacy or a premise that can not be demonstrated to be true.
6. I have never observed a phenomenon in which the existence of a god was a necessary antecedent for the known or probable explanation for the causation of that phenomenon.
7. Several proposed (and generally accepted) explanations for observable phenomena that were previously based on the agency of a god(s), have subsequently been replaced with rational, natural explanations, each substantiated with evidence that excluded the agency of a god(s). I have never encountered _vice versa._
8. I have never experienced the presence of a god through intercession of angels, divine revelation, the miraculous act of divinity, or any occurrence of a supernatural event.
9. Every phenomenon that I have ever observed has *_emerged_* from necessary and sufficient antecedents over time without exception. In other words, I have never observed a phenomenon (entity, process, object, event, process, substance, system, or being) that was created _ex nihilo_ - that is instantaneously came into existence by the solitary volition of a deity.
10. All claims of a supernatural or divine nature that I have encountered have either been refuted to my satisfaction or do not present as _falsifiable._
ALL of these facts lead me to the only rational conclusion that concurs with the realities I have been presented - and that is the fact that there is *_no good reason_* for me to acknowledge the reality of any particular god.
I have heard often that atheism is the denial of the Abrahamic god. But denial is the active rejection of a substantiated fact once credible evidence has been presented. Atheism is simply withholding such acknowledgment until sufficient credible evidence is introduced. *_It is natural, rational, and prudent to be skeptical of unsubstantiated claims, especially extraordinary ones._*
I welcome any cordial response. Peace.