UK Theft Act 1968

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 2. 08. 2024
  • A summary of several parts of the Theft Act UK 1968 with tips on how to remember some of the elements and visual cues to help you lodge the information into your short term memory.
    Police crammer guides are available at: checkmatepublishing.info/shop/
    Find out more study tips here: checkmatepublishing.info/study/
    Follow us on Facebook: / policecrammer

Komentáře • 12

  • @Art_performance
    @Art_performance Před 12 dny

    Wonderful teacher❤

  • @Ifyshalom1
    @Ifyshalom1 Před 3 lety +1

    this is gold! thank you.

  • @tomaszkarpinski5767
    @tomaszkarpinski5767 Před 2 lety +2

    First class explanation!

  • @ozyyi175
    @ozyyi175 Před rokem

    Hi do you have multiple choice questions based on theft act 1968??

  • @flyhigh9944
    @flyhigh9944 Před 3 lety

    Hey is all of this still relevant in 2020? Is any of it obsolete??

    • @checkmatepublishing
      @checkmatepublishing  Před 3 lety

      All still relevant :-) You'll find more on our website at www.checkmatepublishing.info

    • @flyhigh9944
      @flyhigh9944 Před 3 lety +1

      Ty you have helped me greatly 👍

  • @jaytealstone1687
    @jaytealstone1687 Před 4 lety +1

    Good video but spelt actus reus wrong lol

    • @flyhigh9944
      @flyhigh9944 Před 3 lety

      Jay Tealstone would you know if any of this is obsolete now?

    • @jaytealstone1687
      @jaytealstone1687 Před 3 lety

      @@flyhigh9944 Hi flyhigh. I've looked over the video for you and:
      OBSOLETE (sort of):
      - Regarding the Ghosh test from R v Ghosh, the Subjective part of the test is no longer required to prove by the prosecution. The Supreme Court decided that it did not accurately represent the law - Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] UKSC 67. The Objective part of the Ghosh test, however, is still very much relevant.
      ADDITIONAL RANDOM INFO:
      - Regarding taking property to make up for a debt, there is a little bit of wiggle room for how much the taken property is worth before it becomes dishonest. For example, if there is a debt of £100, and the defendant takes property worth £105 for the debt, it's still not dishonest. However, if the property taken was £500 for example, the Courts would not accept it, and it would be found to be dishonest.
      - Weirdly specific, but if a neighbour has a tree which has a branch coming over your fence and into your property, you can remove the branch up to where your property ends, as long as you give it back to the neighbour. Usually though branches can't be removed if you don't own the tree.
      - In a shop for example, the moment you pick up an item off the shelf, you have appropriated that property.

  • @captainheinie6355
    @captainheinie6355 Před 3 lety

    This is Admiralty law not common law.