love my 2014. has 65,000 miles on it. drive it 80 miles a day. I get great gas mileage. only had it in the shop once for the brake recall. I'm just not sure if the newer malibu will be as good as mine.
Just bought a 2014 Malibu lt with only 40k miles on it. . Looks and drives amazing. . I upgraded all the interior speakers to aftermarket pioneer speakers and now it sounds and drives and looks amazing lol
Usually if your car has problems, it's usually the mechanic. This one dealer I took my car to, the engine light used to always come on after a visit. A lot of dealerships are real shady though, charging you for work you don't need (etc...). You can't be loyal to one place.
I’ve had a 2005 Malibu, now a 2010 2LT. Miss my 05 everyday but the 2010 is a solid car and good build. I’m still doing some modding to make it look a lot better, but it runs absolutely fine. Love the malibus
I have a 2014 Malibu LT Eco 2.5L that I bought new for $18,423 in June 2014, now have (Jan 2019) 28,800 miles and the only complaint I have is the road noise. Great mpg and nice ride. First new vehicle since a new 1974 F150.
The 2014 and 2015 Malibu looked so much nicer than this new generation one (2016 or later). It had its unique look to it- much different from the Chevy Cruze or Impala. Much different from competitor midsize sedans, such as the Ford Fusion. What’s sadly disappearing is the uniqueness of each car. I love the grill of the old one and the back end. I loved how the license plate holder lied below the trunk. The 2016 or later version looks like a larger and less attractive Cruze. I wouldn’t be surprised if the old one were to become a classic in the future.
The 0-60 time on the 2016 Malibu seems a bit slow for 1 mile above sea level, I actually test drove one myself. My new 2016 1.5 Turbo civic goes 0-60 in 7.6 seconds at 1 mile above sea level as shown on The Fast Lane Car (TFL)
I just drove a Malibu Limited to Colorado about a month ago. It was a fine driver and another great Epsilon body from GM. I've had a couple already and would be quite happy with the Limited. I can't wait to try the new version Malibu, it may finally get me out of my old Epsilon (Pontiac G6).
I owned a 2013 Malibu and the car was okay, nothing great. Very simple point A to B car. I returned the car because I feared the common electrical problems would start at any moment, which I did have problems with the dash and HVAC. Anyway, I went with a friend to check the 2016 model at a dealer and could tell right away that though the car got a make over, the overall quality and feel had decreased significantly!
Focus vs Sentra! When? Its only $1,200 less for old one, 1,400 is not that much of a differance.. They should give off much more about 4 Grand or more.
So going from a 2.5 liter engine to a 1.5 liter engine only improves fuel economy by 1 MPG what a joke! Plus that smaller engine has to work way harder so it definitely won't last too long! And I can't believe you can no longer add fog lights to the Malibu! Also I heard the cloths seats are super uncomfortable and unsupportive and wear out fast! I'll probably get a Toyota instead!
+sleepybird09 just wait the 4 cylinder Camaro will blow up at 50,000 miles and Kia sucks ass you have to crazy to waste money on a Korean or American 4 cylinder car. Japanese auto makers own that market.
But that looked like a car just pulling away from a stoplight normally, did it not? And maybe they should consider moving headquarters so they can get actual 0-60 times.
Nonsense. Lots of cars have no drama when flooring the pedal because they make too little power and have somewhat decent tires. Tire package makes a HUGE difference in off the line traction. Millions of people live or drive at elevation so I welcome the numbers they use.
I didn't mind the looks,inside and out of the outgoing model.far better than the second generation FWD Malibu and malibu max.but it was getting old.the new one not bad either.
My 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited which still has the 2.5 L, which is actually the reason I was sold on it versus shelling a turbo. Gets zero to 60 way Way way better than 10 point Whatever seconds. I don’t know if it’s had terrifica tune or if there’s a different cam or evhaust work done but I’m hitting 0-60 at eight or so seconds 0 to 60?
I have a 2016 limited lt chevy Malibu it comes 202hp stock but it’s a great car I love the car the government meter doesn’t let the car get past 129 but it’s great
Now...honda is like the joke car..hate to tell you..but does last a long time. Toyota is not doing well where i live..so it will stand out. Ford is top seller in Mich. So like a ford fusion for me
I feel you man , i own one and its been the worst car i ever driven in my life , it feels so heavy , and has way too little power that can help it launch.
Thank goodness he uses a bear to show trunk room. Now when I kidnap someone I can see where they'll be more comfortable. .... I mean when I deliver boxes.... 😐
the older Chevy limited ltz is better looking more power mine does 0 to 60 in 7.4 second no 10. 47 like he did he can drive you got to rev. the engine then launch the new malibu is cheap looking hood prop plus it's almost all aluminium body and p l a stick so it's gonna be quicker older one awsome built better too looks like a mini camaro
No the new redesigned Malibu is better it has push button start and you can leave your keys in your pocket and unlock the door by pressing the door handle and bigger touch screen I wish I waited to get this one now I'm stuck 2015 ahh
@@rishipolo i worked on a few those & they wouldn't open up when you reach for the handle & yea i know the they start with the key fob but the other guy was talking "push button" which located inside the car but ok
The 2014 comes with a 2.5l na or a 2.0 turbo with 300hp Also the ltz is faster than the LT and ls Also they didnt redesign the malibu they made it into a smaller impala and the impala didnt look as good so this malibu is just ugly
Your "0-60 MPH COMPARISON" is a MILE ABOVE sea-level. 0-60 data is flawed. NON-TURBO engine power noticeably decreases at high altitude. Turbocharged engines make almost the same power at high elevation as they do at sea level.
*what? you do realize the front occupants get more room along with more trunk space its not all going to magically go to the back seats you ditz. keep in mind this is a mid sized its also one of the *lightest and largest mid sized in its class...* you must think the camry is super tiny 😂😂😂*
Over the years they keep making theses car bigger. Sooner or later midsize car might be full size and compact might be midsize, and dont forget the subcompacts to.
Altitude still has an effect on turbo charged engines. It's just not as bad as a NA engine. What happens is there is less air to compress, so you are making less boost.
im sorry but the new Malibu is just not as looking as the out going one. i also hate the new stop and start system. I have a 2010 Chevy impala which she has been very reliable with almost 200k miles on her and no major problems. The new Impala is too big i wanted something smaller. Unfortunately i am all about my American Brand Vehicles but just can't do it with the new Malibu. Also it just has no pickup.
I have a 2014 Chevy Malibu, and it has been an excellent car.
I have a 2016 eco limited and it has 93k miles on it. Never has had any issues
I just bought 1
@Landon Golombeski I've had issues(minor) with my 2013 Malibu but that most likely due to the previous owner not doing regular maintenance.
Chevy ftw! I want one.
@Landon Golombeski My dumbass got a 2010 that had a transmission issue...that trunk space was godlike though.
I like this reviewer. He gets straight to the point and doesn't attempt lame humor.
love my 2014. has 65,000 miles on it. drive it 80 miles a day. I get great gas mileage. only had it in the shop once for the brake recall. I'm just not sure if the newer malibu will be as good as mine.
Dom p I'm looking at the 2016 limited. My commute is about the same. What kind of mileage do you get? Thanks
Same, I got 87,000 miles on mine, really good on gas, 400 miles gas is still good
The older one just look more appealing than the new one.
facts
Lie
No
My opinion the old generation is much better looking 👌 I'm getting the Chevy Malibu limited soon.
I totally agree with you
The new Malibu has an ugly big ass like Impala also the interior is made of cheap plastic whereas the old one was from leather
XODIZE avita and the old one is much faster seems they took power away for looks
1970's generation is the best because it was a muscle car.
I like the new body style because it is better looking then old body style besides the new body style has push button start and bigger touch screen
I love the looks of the old one.
Just bought a 2014 Malibu lt with only 40k miles on it. . Looks and drives amazing. . I upgraded all the interior speakers to aftermarket pioneer speakers and now it sounds and drives and looks amazing lol
Usually if your car has problems, it's usually the mechanic. This one dealer I took my car to, the engine light used to always come on after a visit. A lot of dealerships are real shady though, charging you for work you don't need (etc...). You can't be loyal to one place.
I love my 15 LT to me the styling is better than the new ones..
I have the '14 and the body looks good to me..
I love both versions. The newer one more, but I still love the older one.
How many mpg?
I still like my 2012 Malibu Ltz V6.
mike wilson me too v6 3,6😎
I’ve had a 2005 Malibu, now a 2010 2LT. Miss my 05 everyday but the 2010 is a solid car and good build. I’m still doing some modding to make it look a lot better, but it runs absolutely fine. Love the malibus
I have a 2014 Malibu LT Eco 2.5L that I bought new for $18,423 in June 2014, now have (Jan 2019) 28,800 miles and the only complaint I have is the road noise. Great mpg and nice ride. First new vehicle since a new 1974 F150.
i have the 14 had it for 2 years now, so far no problem.
I like the old body style much better 👍 Lt would b Perfect for me 👌
The 2014 and 2015 Malibu looked so much nicer than this new generation one (2016 or later). It had its unique look to it- much different from the Chevy Cruze or Impala. Much different from competitor midsize sedans, such as the Ford Fusion. What’s sadly disappearing is the uniqueness of each car. I love the grill of the old one and the back end. I loved how the license plate holder lied below the trunk. The 2016 or later version looks like a larger and less attractive Cruze. I wouldn’t be surprised if the old one were to become a classic in the future.
The front face looks better on the old one.
Curtis Reid and the trunk
Older generation Malibu is a good looking car also
I have previous model Malibu , I love 2014 malibu
The 0-60 time on the 2016 Malibu seems a bit slow for 1 mile above sea level, I actually test drove one myself. My new 2016 1.5 Turbo civic goes 0-60 in 7.6 seconds at 1 mile above sea level as shown on The Fast Lane Car (TFL)
I'm pretty confident that wasn't full throttle on both of the 0-60 tests.
I agree
Engineering explained did a 0-60 of the 2016 2.0 turbo and he got 6.7seconds.....lol. These guys don't know how to get a good time!
2.0 turbo seems a lot more appropriate for this sized car.
It wasn't
its a slow piece of shit.
I just drove a Malibu Limited to Colorado about a month ago. It was a fine driver and another great Epsilon body from GM. I've had a couple already and would be quite happy with the Limited. I can't wait to try the new version Malibu, it may finally get me out of my old Epsilon (Pontiac G6).
Love my 15 Malibu LT2. Its a fine cruisers. The gezzer mobile.
My 2014 Malibu LS with the 2.5L does 0-60 in roughly 7 seconds. Idk where you got 10s from
My dad is getting a 2014 Malibu this week and he said it’s really not bad
I owned a 2013 Malibu and the car was okay, nothing great. Very simple point A to B car. I returned the car because I feared the common electrical problems would start at any moment, which I did have problems with the dash and HVAC. Anyway, I went with a friend to check the 2016 model at a dealer and could tell right away that though the car got a make over, the overall quality and feel had decreased significantly!
I've bought the 16 limited with 3k mi on it, looks much better than new generation, the new generation looks like Impala which I already have one.
New one beats the hell out of the previous model except it no longer has a CD player
Who still listens to cds?
@@MrPAULONEAL i do. Better quality
Roman and Nathan make this channel awesome not this boring dude
+Troy Strain keyboard commando is such a freak its jot funny, always posts extremely weird things
Focus vs Sentra! When?
Its only $1,200 less for old one, 1,400 is not that much of a differance.. They should give off much more about 4 Grand or more.
focus duhh
My co-worker has a 2015 Malibu and loves it. Different strokes for different folks
yawn...after watching that, I could really use the teddy bear...
Just bought a Malibu lt 16 and I like it so far 1 day so far
no comparison the new one is better in every single aspect by leaps and bounds. thank god.
exactly
1970 Malibu is the best.
10.7 seconds??? we’re you trying? I love my 14 malibu and my 60 second is 5.8..... you can even look up the average is 6.8-7.4 GREAT VIDEO THOUGH!!!
So going from a 2.5 liter engine to a 1.5 liter engine only improves fuel economy by 1 MPG what a joke! Plus that smaller engine has to work way harder so it definitely won't last too long! And I can't believe you can no longer add fog lights to the Malibu! Also I heard the cloths seats are super uncomfortable and unsupportive and wear out fast! I'll probably get a Toyota instead!
I like the front of the old Malibu but the rear of the new, wish they could blend the 2
I agree. I like the old better than new. I have found there’s a few cars these days where I’d rather buy the older one lol
Personally I didn’t get a newer Malibu because they literally made the newer ones look like the impala and I love my 2014 Malibu
you only tested 0-60 not top speeds! 2014 is faster in the long run, no?
older generation looks better. agressive look. new model just weird.
I like the new model more
I love chevys and the Malibu but to be honest 😅 couldn't concentrate on the cars with this handsome man Reviewing 😍 very good review though 😊!
the old one looks so much better
love my 2018 malibu
TripNshroomz Me too!
Do you still have it and has it had any major repairs?
@@superjam18 I don’t & no I drove that car 106 miles a day to & from work no problems
my Dad has a 2015 LS,he likes it. nice decent car in my opinion
Why would he buy a 4 cylinder Chevy? They can only make v8s all these 4 cylinder cars are Korean.
i'm Canadian .... gas is not cheap
+sleepybird09 just wait the 4 cylinder Camaro will blow up at 50,000 miles and Kia sucks ass you have to crazy to waste money on a Korean or American 4 cylinder car. Japanese auto makers own that market.
I have a 2015 LT and I love it. It's look like more agresive
Old one looks better in my opinion
There's no way in hell that was full throttle on the 0-60. My old Ford Focus chirped the tires when you floored it and it only had 130 horsepower.
It's also geared differently and is a lot lighter.
at a mile above sea level the cars lose a lot of power.
But that looked like a car just pulling away from a stoplight normally, did it not? And maybe they should consider moving headquarters so they can get actual 0-60 times.
Nonsense. Lots of cars have no drama when flooring the pedal because they make too little power and have somewhat decent tires. Tire package makes a HUGE difference in off the line traction. Millions of people live or drive at elevation so I welcome the numbers they use.
Ya should go full throttle on the 0-60
This some good content
I didn't mind the looks,inside and out of the outgoing model.far better than the second generation FWD Malibu and malibu max.but it was getting old.the new one not bad either.
Nice review. Wish the prices of older (not used) Malibu on lots were lower though. BTW, nice music chosen for the review as well.
My 2016 Chevrolet Malibu Limited which still has the 2.5 L, which is actually the reason I was sold on it versus shelling a turbo. Gets zero to 60 way Way way better than 10 point Whatever seconds. I don’t know if it’s had terrifica tune or if there’s a different cam or evhaust work done but I’m hitting 0-60 at eight or so seconds 0 to 60?
2016 and the 2017 and 2018 is nice
Nathan in the trunk is much more fun
hey thats the song that the officer danced in HaloMastermind5
No, old school is spring loaded hood hinges.
Closer to sea level old motor would probably be faster since it is normally aspirated.
I suppose vice-versa. Malibu 2 (2017
0-60 in 10.74 seconds?? Wtf are you doing wrong?
Is There A v6 Malibu?
I have a 2016 limited lt chevy Malibu it comes 202hp stock but it’s a great car I love the car the government meter doesn’t let the car get past 129 but it’s great
Love this car 👍🏼
The 2016 looking much better than 2017 2018
It's the same look tho
Are they the same motors. Any difference between 2013 and 16 motor???
That spying feature for your kids is a terrible idea. You need to trust your children to do the right thing, not micromanage them.
Then they get their asses whooped and never driving another one of your cars again.
Jeff got there by editing the video
just so you all know ok, thanks
They are both ugly to me, but I do like the technology and efficiency of the 2016 Malibu.
Old gen is hideous, looks like a 2012-14 Camry lol
i love both. but they should have kept the last 2015 body style i look a little better than 2016 but it sharp
how in the world do you need 8 key fobs?!
We own the 2014 model...worst car.
Failed to started at 8K.
Died on highway at 18K
Battery needed replacing at 22K
Now...honda is like the joke car..hate to tell you..but does last a long time.
Toyota is not doing well where i live..so it will stand out.
Ford is top seller in Mich.
So like a ford fusion for me
I feel you man , i own one and its been the worst car i ever driven in my life , it feels so heavy , and has way too little power that can help it launch.
+CrazyFastRapper ford has equally as bad quality as Chevy. Get an ecoboost and don't expect to be driving it for very long.
Dukiny Gaming those do suck..a normal engine lasts a long time though
***** i still like ford and dodge..but i respect what you think.
Even the 2.0 not up to the class leader Ford 2.7 echo boost Fusion.
pick an old car that everybody loves and compare it with the new
Not the American Muscle car it used to be in the 70s anymore.
The one looks better and the inside of the old looks better too
I couldn't stand the sight of the previous gen Malibu. The 2016 looks awesome!
Show the ltz models come on man wtf
Can I put a 2014 Chevy Malibu front end/bumper on a 2013
how well does it filter out rough road?
So much for comparing the interiors...bad Brian!
I got a 2016 Chevy Malibu but mine's look like the previous year why is that
You have a 2016 malibu limited they carried the last generation over with the new generation.
Thank goodness he uses a bear to show trunk room. Now when I kidnap someone I can see where they'll be more comfortable. .... I mean when I deliver boxes.... 😐
🤔🤔🧐👀🕵️♂️
Where are you guys located?
the older Chevy limited ltz is better looking more power mine does 0 to 60 in 7.4 second no 10. 47 like he did he can drive you got to rev. the engine then launch the new malibu is cheap looking hood prop plus it's almost all aluminium body and p l a stick so it's gonna be quicker older one awsome built better too looks like a mini camaro
No the new redesigned Malibu is better it has push button start and you can leave your keys in your pocket and unlock the door by pressing the door handle and bigger touch screen I wish I waited to get this one now I'm stuck 2015 ahh
Nicholas Menasian the things you said are available in 2013 malibu ltz..what are you talking about
@@rishipolo u can do that in 2013 how? Seriously bro not being sarcastic.
@@supremevictory4310 uhmm.. Like he said bro.. Keep the key in pocket.. Press the button on door handle.. And it unlocks.. You can even remote start
@@rishipolo i worked on a few those & they wouldn't open up when you reach for the handle & yea i know the they start with the key fob but the other guy was talking "push button" which located inside the car but ok
Ay Yo. When I say "Mali," you say "Bu." MALI-
Bu
+fistbump007 FU
BU
70 Chevy Malibu =better b/c its old school.
The 2014 comes with a 2.5l na or a 2.0 turbo with 300hp
Also the ltz is faster than the LT and ls
Also they didnt redesign the malibu they made it into a smaller impala and the impala didnt look as good so this malibu is just ugly
It’s crazy how many people prefer the older look. I thought it looked like a shitty Britney Spears road trip car, but tomatoe - tomato I guess
malibu 2016!!
Why didn't he shine the engine in the 2014
Is this even a fair comparison? They're not even the same trim level. The 2014 is the cheapest/base model while the 2016 seems like a higher model.
Your "0-60 MPH COMPARISON" is a MILE ABOVE sea-level. 0-60 data is flawed.
NON-TURBO engine power noticeably decreases at high altitude. Turbocharged engines make almost the same power at high elevation as they do at sea level.
I love my Chevy Malibu
,2015 LS
So good it goes 0 160
Kendall Banks mind too
The new one looks like it's too heavy for the suspension
What sate was this filmed in?
This car is noticeably larger than cars like the Camry and Accord. It should have more room inside than this.
*what? you do realize the front occupants get more room along with more trunk space its not all going to magically go to the back seats you ditz. keep in mind this is a mid sized its also one of the *lightest and largest mid sized in its class...* you must think the camry is super tiny 😂😂😂*
Over the years they keep making theses car bigger. Sooner or later midsize car might be full size and compact might be midsize, and dont forget the subcompacts to.
this new Malibu makes the 2004 malibu look like a compact car
there is no freaking way yall went full throttle. I can look up multiple videos of the 2.5 ecotec going under 8 seconds 0-60....
they're a mile above sea level bro
so 30% loss in power?
Shouldn't be, it's a turbo.
Altitude still has an effect on turbo charged engines. It's just not as bad as a NA engine. What happens is there is less air to compress, so you are making less boost.
im sorry but the new Malibu is just not as looking as the out going one. i also hate the new stop and start system. I have a 2010 Chevy impala which she has been very reliable with almost 200k miles on her and no major problems. The new Impala is too big i wanted something smaller. Unfortunately i am all about my American Brand Vehicles but just can't do it with the new Malibu. Also it just has no pickup.
The '08-'12 models were the worst to work on.
the new Malibu rear is very BMW like no?
Yes, thanks to Chris Bangle who designed that "butt", the "BMW butt"