That is John's voice. They found a recording that John made. The problem was they had remove the back ground music. So they can rerecord it with Paul and Ringo.
Yeah, I was under the impression that the AI was an advanced noise reduction/background removal system rather than recreating his voice. Maybe it's a combination of the two. Very interesting question. I'm not a big fan of the recreation thing. Don't think John Lennon would care for technology that could make him say anything it wants.
What if someone were to try to recreate Janis Joplin’s vocals for Buried Alive In The Blues? Lyrics were written & instrumentals were recorded. But she never got to record her vocals (not even a demo vocal track) before she passed.
If people had gotten on board it could have been Spotify and CZcams in one package. The hesitation to accept the new reality cost established artists like Metallica, and the record industry, billions.
I was banned from Napster by Metallica and they did not get another penny from me. With mates like Kirk and Lars I can understand why Hetfield would drink excessively.
@@poorboyjim6392 Lars was too idiotic to realize only their paying fans wanted their MP3s. His reflex to "ban" his own fans was too repugnant to continue buying or caring about his band. To think he had the opportunity to say something directly to all the most interested consumers of his shit and he thought the way to go was "banning".
Artists with $$ & power need to use the influence to chg & protect 1. Ticketmaster: Artists need tell venues to stop using them 2. Like the issues Napster created, need to unite 3.
When record labels decide that they no longer need to sign artist but can go to an engineer and have AI generate an album based on Beyoncé’s, Taylor Swift’s or Rolling Stones sounds and writing style then we will see the bigger issue. When AI can write an entire script and create images for movies and tv shows and not employ actors, writers, editors etc. we will see. When you are replaced at your job we will see.
I'm a musician who does plenty of music without samples. It's not the same thing. There's nothing wrong with involving technology in music creation. But there is a point where the craft is completely dishonored. We are now there. The only people that are really championing this are the one's who are gonna make money off of it. And they're also controlling the narrative to get other people to get excited about it and ignore the damage AI will do to professional musicians.
Who said humans should be the only ones creating music that other humans enjoy? Society will benefit if there is more music, which AI can produce. It doesn’t matter where music comes from, so long as there is music. Society has no obligation to protect your way of living. It’s up to you to evolve. Survival of the fittest.
ok, but AI generates music from models that were created from the work of various artists who didn't give permission that they don't earn anything from it and still go to make them obselect, for a group of 27 people it monopolizes the entire industry, is that fair? I think q n,
Rock fans have been asking for 40 years, "How is it creative to sample songs instead of writing your own?" Just because you come up with some rhymes, doesn't mean you should be able to put them on someone else's music.
In a non-AI recording of my grandmother telling me she loves me, that's not her either really. And that's not an argumentative rhetorical point I'm trying to make. It's just a side thought. There's been many people or cultures over time that have struggled say, with reconciling the reproduction of a voice in a recording with identity and understanding. If we all recall our early life comprehensions of pre-existing technologies and the internal negotiations/epiphanies that went with them, we mayyy find some breadcrumbs to inform how we can utilise AI ethically and comfortably. The financials are another question and I don't have many forethoughts there. Of course, money is already part of this equation while we're still getting our heads around everything as a collective, and that's difficult but probably normal.
The late polymath and futurist, Terence McKenna, said about AI in an interview 25 years ago, "If it doesn't have the ethics of Buddha, the human race may be down for the count." Ten, nine, eight... AI has the ethics of its creators, i.e. pretty much devoid of any. The creators are overwhelmingly male with the wisdom and maturity of adolescent boys, which is how they typically stay into "adult"hood, as evidenced by countless comments I've seen online.
I think you also need to keep in mind that the people who you see commenting online aren't the people who are creating these AI, the people you see commenting online are likely working their basic 9-5 jobs, as people who ARE creating important things don't have time.
Ne-Yo is one of those celebrities you forget is a celebrity because he talks so much damn sense. Most celebs are so politically correct about everything and then along comes mr Smith with some real talk. This dude is bigger than his music, that brain under his hats works on overtime!!! Dude is smart.
I will say this. AI can copy an artist down to his manorisms. U can use AI to copy the artist to a tee, but the one thing AI will and can not capture is their soul. Artists like NeYo put their heart and soul into the music they create, and AI will never be able to capture that part of the music and writing process
The difference is that photographers can't use an artist's work to make money without compensating them. And the reverse is true. Witness the Lynn Goldberg vs Andy Warhol estate court decision. An artist can't use a photographer's work without compensation, either.
In the early days of photography, painters and illustration drawers were often wary of this new medium because it threatened their livelihoods. Photography could capture reality with precision and in less time than it took to paint or draw a scene. This raised concerns among artists about the potential loss of demand for their work. Additionally, there was some skepticism about whether photography could be considered a true art form, as it was initially seen as merely a mechanical process rather than a creative endeavor requiring skill and talent. However, over time, many artists embraced photography as a new tool for artistic expression, and it eventually became recognized as a legitimate art form in its own right. Now switch the word photography with AI. See what I mean?
Ne-Yo you needs to copyright his likeness, voice, and writing style/rythem/ryme scheme. Then get a royalty every time someone uses A.I. to make a song using your style.
I am from the generation whose original music has been sampled to a great degree by this and prior (since Hip Hop is now 50!) generations. With respecet, please explain, nicely, how Ne-Yo's comments differ.
AI’s impact on history is quite revealing as well. Since a certain Austrian painter’s voice has been translated in English, many people now feel tricked and that our so called “greatest generation” were a bunch of fucking chumps.
I'm not perfectly sure of what to make of AI, but all music and creativity is always based on other ideas, styles and creations. Tbh, human created music, acting, writing, programming will be over VERY soon
AI is on its way to being capable to replace everyone. There's has been code for computers to do their own coding for years and recently, its only gotten "better", if u can use that word. Mankind will have to choose.
I've never heard of this artist before and likely have never heard his music. But I just consider AI as theft as his best argument. And I agree with him there. I wrote my first AI production system back in 1983 so I know a bit about what it can do.
When he write songs he has to imitate the style of the artist for example Beyonce not imitating neyo style on the song he written base of her.. so whats the point.
While I agree with him, music industry got rid of artists a long time ago. Trained musicians for computer generated music. Auto-tuning voices. Music now seems devoid of tember now. So we replaced musicians, we replaced truly great singers with technology laden average singers. Seems odd to have a problem with it now.
"How is it is creative to mimic me?" While he sounds, performs and gets his creativity from the likes of Prince, Michael Jackson, Luther Vandross, Teddy Pendergrass and other artists that came before him. That was a bad argument on his part. On one individual should own definition to creativity. The market, fanbase, and industry, as a whole, decides what is creative, and further more what is art.
I don't know this man, and have not finished the video. But the point is clear. Many people are showing off their guitar skills on youtube playing other peoples music. Nice, but this is not creativity. AI is not creative from the perspective of making anything new. Oh yes it can blend styles, but that is still based on existing source material. gahhh
🧢 if his opinion matter he'd be making money off of it instead of crying about genetic features that don't involve him nobody is looking for a feature with neo
@@KingTut1991 I didn’t say anything about a feature. He's a songwriter. That's how he makes a living. AI replacing songwriters directly impacts his money.
I grew up to his music. He's one of the few artists who is truly talented as a writer and a performer. I work in tech but the motives of ai was changed by greedy vcs.
Not necessarily. The creative ones could find a new way to make a business out of it if they participate. But certainly, we are possibly seeing the end of unassisted human Music SuperStars. We are going to have a lot of comets but no more Stars.
Funny to me that rappers, who are notorious for stealing aka “sampling” music tracks from other artists to use as their own, are complaining about AI stealing their stuff 😂
Sorry to hear that you seem to have a dignosis that makes it difficult for you to focus. If you close your eyes and just listen, you would have heard that he has sensible opinions on this matter.
@@iomega2 never be sorry in life papo. That same remorse you have won’t serve you in the future I assure you. It’ll only hold you back when the inevitability hits.
@@bandit910 I'm not quite sure that answer was meant for me? But ok, thanks Mr. Hemingway. You sure do have a way with words. I will now go and talk to my kids since when they talk, they make sense.
Neyo complains about AI technology while also having ghost writers, sound engineers, label companies, and a whole host of other people and technology that made him successful that's why I'm not taking him seriously. If you go to a concert what do you think they sound so bad? They found nothing like they do when you hear them on the radio or the internet. Their whole persona and life has been built on a lie. He's threatened by AI technology because he can't benefit from it if you threw these people some dollars I guarantee you they wouldn't give a fuck If somebody actually cares about the artist they'll support you, but if somebody likes AI stuff they'll support it to there's nothing wrong with that and people need to get used to it and stop acting like they're very existence is threatened. Eventually we're going to run into other intelligent beings who are probably more advanced than us in other areas and this type of immature center of the universe attitude needs to be put in check.
I am guessing that this man says that Michael bublé is not an artist but does the same thing as a AI does and copy other artists. But according to me I belive all artist steal from the past or do an homage to those who came before. Because no artist come from a vacuum and haven't heard and learned from former artists and musicians. If an artist belive that they are the ultimate and have no part from others I belive they are a bit disillusioned.
It just means that artist have to work harder to stay relevant and be creative. The entertainment industry promote and peddle artist to the point where it's just gross. A.I. only becomes the problem when it threatens the artist and the music industries pockets. A.I. however can be an efficient tool in producing and song writing, less time in the studio, artist can develop and create more content. And the who the hell is Ne Yo
yeah these artist be crying all the time :/ WHat he dont understand- we are all copy cats by nature, NeYo copied someone, that person took from someone, that person copied someone or something, etc. Now, we getting in times were its easier to (takeaway) with ease....oh and faster and possibly better (?) . Which is why its making these artist stuck because they dont know how to win with AI....well my friend....ADAPT and be creative as you claim you are.....:/
Crazy how he's complaining about AI yet there's a whole group of people that writes his lyrics for him. Hell the labels take the majority of all there money from them anyways so watching him whine about this is actually kind of funny He's trying to get a law passed that will pay celebrities from AI created content that's what he's trying to do. AI isn't going to destroy nobody's music career I heard that same shit about photography. If a person loves an artist they're going to buy stuff
What if the imitations get there first? AI recreations of a rising artist's sound will make them seem like copycats of their own work and damage their careers.
The hypocrisy of his comments leave me speechless. And the lady whoever she is doesn't address the elephant in the room.😮 His whole generation doesn't have one creative bone , coliqtively in there wasted gene Poole!😅 At one point it was like 90% of there music had either straight out plagiarized or sampled some previous artist work. I can remember it like yesterday.... In there best colloqqial
He comes from an industry built on IP theft. His arguments might have resonance IF he made them in 1980 but remix after remix destroyed creativity a long time ago.
This is stealing someone's identity to make money. Lennon's voice wasn't used to honor him, it was a money grab. The rich and famous are so lazy they can't even be bothered to find new artist, just imitate and regurgitate classics. This is a bad use of A.I.
Sign 'o the times, baby... Sign o' the times. You better speak, Shaffer Chimere! It's so sad that this is where we're at, musically. AI is slowly, but surely phasing out certain channels right here on CZcams. On the music side though, it's coming... Yeah man, it's coming. AI is a symptom of the carelessness of music. Why bother paying a new "artist" that's not gon here for too long when we can use AI? Why bother paying a Brian McKnight X-Y-Z when we can do it on this computer for free? You seem to be a pure artist, Shaffer Chimere, but w/ the way things are going, it almost feels like it's all for nothing. Think about it. Hell, AI is gon replace AT (auto tune). Turn on the radio or however you consume music and pretty much everything already sounds like AI due to the excessive use of auto tune. Listen to Mariah Carey's latest concert. She legit sounds like a prerecorded computer. Music is free nowadays. AI just seems more convenient. I listen to music from the '70, '80 and '90s and I'm completely satisfied. I know it's not gon be no AI, JI, RI, QI. I know that when I listen to Mr. Al Green, it's gon be Mr. Al Green. When I listen to Ms. Kelly Price, it's gon be Ms. Kelly Price. And it's as simple as that.
There is no creativity, only imitation and theft. Iroric, since most rappers and DJs never actually "compose" music. They sample other musicians' work.
Man has VERY good points to make!
Neo spoke so much truth here👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 thank you my brotha✊🏽
Love him when he talk about politics in 2024. Clearly he Will vote blue. 🤟🤟🤟
Ne-Yo*
This interview is Ne-yo's best bars
I respect that he is standing on what he said.
love this interview..
That is John's voice. They found a recording that John made. The problem was they had remove the back ground music. So they can rerecord it with Paul and Ringo.
Yeah, I was under the impression that the AI was an advanced noise reduction/background removal system rather than recreating his voice. Maybe it's a combination of the two. Very interesting question. I'm not a big fan of the recreation thing. Don't think John Lennon would care for technology that could make him say anything it wants.
bro, i miss his songs like Mad and ugh... Mad.
What if someone were to try to recreate Janis Joplin’s vocals for Buried Alive In The Blues? Lyrics were written & instrumentals were recorded. But she never got to record her vocals (not even a demo vocal track) before she passed.
You can’t mimic Neyo! He inspired me personally
Legend! He is awesome live! ❤
8:10 oh and he liked my post on IG after the show. ❤ that was extra legend.
This would piss me off no end too. The man is right.
There are way more negatives then positives, when it comes to AI
false
This reminds me when Metallica was against Napster and people thought they were crazy.
If people had gotten on board it could have been Spotify and CZcams in one package. The hesitation to accept the new reality cost established artists like Metallica, and the record industry, billions.
I was banned from Napster by Metallica and they did not get another penny from me. With mates like Kirk and Lars I can understand why Hetfield would drink excessively.
@@poorboyjim6392 Lars was too idiotic to realize only their paying fans wanted their MP3s. His reflex to "ban" his own fans was too repugnant to continue buying or caring about his band. To think he had the opportunity to say something directly to all the most interested consumers of his shit and he thought the way to go was "banning".
He is totally right
One of my favorite artists love his music 🎶
I wonder if Lennon would like to be used that way. I doubt it, just because he is dead and can't defend himself, doesnt mean he can be used
MATRIX
It’s how we all learn and every creature that ever lived. We mimicked those before us
I say universal digital consumer rights like now.
Know human beings, we always use great technologies for the wrong reasons.
Artists with $$ & power need to use the influence to chg & protect
1. Ticketmaster: Artists need tell venues to stop using them
2. Like the issues Napster created, need to unite
3.
When record labels decide that they no longer need to sign artist but can go to an engineer and have AI generate an album based on Beyoncé’s, Taylor Swift’s or Rolling Stones sounds and writing style then we will see the bigger issue.
When AI can write an entire script and create images for movies and tv shows and not employ actors, writers, editors etc. we will see.
When you are replaced at your job we will see.
He's right
#WORD i agree with #EVERYTHING he's saying...
I share Ne-Yo's point of view 100 %. We have to find a way of protecting humans and their creativity while looking for paths to use AI in useful ways
I mean...i guess the same way its creative to mimic Michael Jackson and use samples...
You let A.I. in when you let auto tune in
Yes, what about sampling?
I'm a musician who does plenty of music without samples.
It's not the same thing.
There's nothing wrong with involving technology in music creation. But there is a point where the craft is completely dishonored. We are now there.
The only people that are really championing this are the one's who are gonna make money off of it. And they're also controlling the narrative to get other people to get excited about it and ignore the damage AI will do to professional musicians.
if you want to support the artist, go see them live, good luck pulling that off A.I.
Tupac enters the chat.
Who said humans should be the only ones creating music that other humans enjoy? Society will benefit if there is more music, which AI can produce. It doesn’t matter where music comes from, so long as there is music. Society has no obligation to protect your way of living. It’s up to you to evolve. Survival of the fittest.
100000%
...Society will benefit more from getting people of the streets, so let's use your house.
ok, but AI generates music from models that were created from the work of various artists who didn't give permission that they don't earn anything from it and still go to make them obselect, for a group of 27 people it monopolizes the entire industry, is that fair? I think q n,
Rock fans have been asking for 40 years, "How is it creative to sample songs instead of writing your own?" Just because you come up with some rhymes, doesn't mean you should be able to put them on someone else's music.
I think Ne-Yo watches the Bellied Up Podcast, with his Beyonce possibly doing Polka music comment, because that just posted yesterday lol
Isn’t Ne-yo basically ignoring pitch correction software already in the industry? (I.E. even bad singers can have perfect pitch at this point)
Mudane living
This man has a lot of common sense. I think I know who he will vote for.
What does who he votes for have to do with anything??? You can't get off Trumps nuts long enough to breathe!
Trump, bigly.
In a non-AI recording of my grandmother telling me she loves me, that's not her either really. And that's not an argumentative rhetorical point I'm trying to make. It's just a side thought.
There's been many people or cultures over time that have struggled say, with reconciling the reproduction of a voice in a recording with identity and understanding. If we all recall our early life comprehensions of pre-existing technologies and the internal negotiations/epiphanies that went with them, we mayyy find some breadcrumbs to inform how we can utilise AI ethically and comfortably. The financials are another question and I don't have many forethoughts there. Of course, money is already part of this equation while we're still getting our heads around everything as a collective, and that's difficult but probably normal.
he is good
There is non just make a tech company make a shit lode of money and good luck with ethics in tech. If it's ever been there.
Suno nuff said
The late polymath and futurist, Terence McKenna, said about AI in an interview 25 years ago, "If it doesn't have the ethics of Buddha, the human race may be down for the count." Ten, nine, eight...
AI has the ethics of its creators, i.e. pretty much devoid of any. The creators are overwhelmingly male with the wisdom and maturity of adolescent boys, which is how they typically stay into "adult"hood, as evidenced by countless comments I've seen online.
I think you also need to keep in mind that the people who you see commenting online aren't the people who are creating these AI, the people you see commenting online are likely working their basic 9-5 jobs, as people who ARE creating important things don't have time.
Wth you mean purity the sound… their own voice is what makes them original..
Went down on the Diddy
CNN's editorial line is in jeopardy...
Ne-Yo is one of those celebrities you forget is a celebrity because he talks so much damn sense. Most celebs are so politically correct about everything and then along comes mr Smith with some real talk. This dude is bigger than his music, that brain under his hats works on overtime!!! Dude is smart.
I will say this. AI can copy an artist down to his manorisms. U can use AI to copy the artist to a tee, but the one thing AI will and can not capture is their soul. Artists like NeYo put their heart and soul into the music they create, and AI will never be able to capture that part of the music and writing process
P Diddy?
That is what artists said about photography back in the day.
The difference is that photographers can't use an artist's work to make money without compensating them. And the reverse is true. Witness the Lynn Goldberg vs Andy Warhol estate court decision. An artist can't use a photographer's work without compensation, either.
In the early days of photography, painters and illustration drawers were often wary of this new medium because it threatened their livelihoods. Photography could capture reality with precision and in less time than it took to paint or draw a scene. This raised concerns among artists about the potential loss of demand for their work. Additionally, there was some skepticism about whether photography could be considered a true art form, as it was initially seen as merely a mechanical process rather than a creative endeavor requiring skill and talent. However, over time, many artists embraced photography as a new tool for artistic expression, and it eventually became recognized as a legitimate art form in its own right. Now switch the word photography with AI. See what I mean?
It will be AI that will give life to the Dragon. If you know then you know 🔥
Ne-Yo you needs to copyright his likeness, voice, and writing style/rythem/ryme scheme. Then get a royalty every time someone uses A.I. to make a song using your style.
I wanna be software.
Maybe in 2030’s or 2050.
I am from the generation whose original music has been sampled to a great degree by this and prior (since Hip Hop is now 50!) generations. With respecet, please explain, nicely, how Ne-Yo's comments differ.
AI’s impact on history is quite revealing as well.
Since a certain Austrian painter’s voice has been translated in English, many people now feel tricked and that our so called “greatest generation” were a bunch of fucking chumps.
I'm not perfectly sure of what to make of AI, but all music and creativity is always based on other ideas, styles and creations. Tbh, human created music, acting, writing, programming will be over VERY soon
Nah, cause the AI stuff is lousy and boring.
AI is on its way to being capable to replace everyone. There's has been code for computers to do their own coding for years and recently, its only gotten "better", if u can use that word. Mankind will have to choose.
Devin
I've never heard of this artist before and likely have never heard his music. But I just consider AI as theft as his best argument. And I agree with him there. I wrote my first AI production system back in 1983 so I know a bit about what it can do.
He didn’t provide a single argument
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery /s
Ne-Yo to Don'tNeed-You
🤣
When he write songs he has to imitate the style of the artist for example Beyonce not imitating neyo style on the song he written base of her.. so whats the point.
I think the benefit should go to the Michael Jackson, Luther Vandross types resting with talents and not necessarily Neyo
sampling wasn't considered creative yet it spawned many new genres of music! Technology democratizes art.
It's way too late to stop Ai. Now, cooperate greediness will make writers a thing of the past
thank god for that. They suck.
While I agree with him, music industry got rid of artists a long time ago. Trained musicians for computer generated music. Auto-tuning voices. Music now seems devoid of tember now.
So we replaced musicians, we replaced truly great singers with technology laden average singers. Seems odd to have a problem with it now.
Using the labor of others without compensation is amoral and illegal.
It will get worse before it gets better for artists
"How is it is creative to mimic me?" While he sounds, performs and gets his creativity from the likes of Prince, Michael Jackson, Luther Vandross, Teddy Pendergrass and other artists that came before him. That was a bad argument on his part. On one individual should own definition to creativity. The market, fanbase, and industry, as a whole, decides what is creative, and further more what is art.
I don't know this man, and have not finished the video. But the point is clear. Many people are showing off their guitar skills on youtube playing other peoples music. Nice, but this is not creativity. AI is not creative from the perspective of making anything new. Oh yes it can blend styles, but that is still based on existing source material. gahhh
What's he complaining about he hasn't made a hit song since I was a child and I'm 33
He has written plenty of great songs for other artists. His opinion definitely matters.
🧢 if his opinion matter he'd be making money off of it instead of crying about genetic features that don't involve him nobody is looking for a feature with neo
@@KingTut1991 I didn’t say anything about a feature. He's a songwriter. That's how he makes a living. AI replacing songwriters directly impacts his money.
I grew up to his music. He's one of the few artists who is truly talented as a writer and a performer. I work in tech but the motives of ai was changed by greedy vcs.
I love Neyo but he mimic Michael Jackson big time
Eventually if this AI thing keeps getting bigger it's going to put you musicians out of business put actors out of work🤔
Not necessarily. The creative ones could find a new way to make a business out of it if they participate.
But certainly, we are possibly seeing the end of unassisted human Music SuperStars.
We are going to have a lot of comets but no more Stars.
Everything is a mimic, bruh
AI music and software evolves
It may sound like mimicry at first but AI is only gonna get better and then it’s gonna start dropping some real heat. You can’t stop AI
AI is garbage, it can never compete with the capabilities humans possess.
Funny to me that rappers, who are notorious for stealing aka “sampling” music tracks from other artists to use as their own, are complaining about AI stealing their stuff 😂
Threat to artists not music. It seems pretty simple and easily solved with updates to copyright law surrounding AI.
I don’t trust anyone who wears a hat indoors to do an interview. You’re not out hunting. You’re trying to get a point across.
Sorry to hear that you seem to have a dignosis that makes it difficult for you to focus. If you close your eyes and just listen, you would have heard that he has sensible opinions on this matter.
@@iomega2 never be sorry in life papo. That same remorse you have won’t serve you in the future I assure you. It’ll only hold you back when the inevitability hits.
@@bandit910 I'm not quite sure that answer was meant for me? But ok, thanks Mr. Hemingway. You sure do have a way with words. I will now go and talk to my kids since when they talk, they make sense.
Neyo complains about AI technology while also having ghost writers, sound engineers, label companies, and a whole host of other people and technology that made him successful that's why I'm not taking him seriously.
If you go to a concert what do you think they sound so bad? They found nothing like they do when you hear them on the radio or the internet.
Their whole persona and life has been built on a lie. He's threatened by AI technology because he can't benefit from it if you threw these people some dollars I guarantee you they wouldn't give a fuck
If somebody actually cares about the artist they'll support you, but if somebody likes AI stuff they'll support it to there's nothing wrong with that and people need to get used to it and stop acting like they're very existence is threatened.
Eventually we're going to run into other intelligent beings who are probably more advanced than us in other areas and this type of immature center of the universe attitude needs to be put in check.
Allah bless and protect united states ✌🏻😎🇺🇸
I am guessing that this man says that Michael bublé is not an artist but does the same thing as a AI does and copy other artists. But according to me I belive all artist steal from the past or do an homage to those who came before. Because no artist come from a vacuum and haven't heard and learned from former artists and musicians. If an artist belive that they are the ultimate and have no part from others I belive they are a bit disillusioned.
It just means that artist have to work harder to stay relevant and be creative. The entertainment industry promote and peddle artist to the point where it's just gross. A.I. only becomes the problem when it threatens the artist and the music industries pockets. A.I. however can be an efficient tool in producing and song writing, less time in the studio, artist can develop and create more content. And the who the hell is Ne Yo
He is one of the most successful R&B/Pop songwriters of the last 20 years. And a pretty good artist too.
All of this opposition coming from a person who tried to mimic Michael Jackson in his music!
Why the fuck would anyone care about who neyo will vote for
yeah these artist be crying all the time :/ WHat he dont understand- we are all copy cats by nature, NeYo copied someone, that person took from someone, that person copied someone or something, etc. Now, we getting in times were its easier to (takeaway) with ease....oh and faster and possibly better (?) . Which is why its making these artist stuck because they dont know how to win with AI....well my friend....ADAPT and be creative as you claim you are.....:/
Wonder if he the same problem with rap stealing it's music for years.
Crazy how he's complaining about AI yet there's a whole group of people that writes his lyrics for him.
Hell the labels take the majority of all there money from them anyways so watching him whine about this is actually kind of funny
He's trying to get a law passed that will pay celebrities from AI created content that's what he's trying to do.
AI isn't going to destroy nobody's music career I heard that same shit about photography. If a person loves an artist they're going to buy stuff
What if the imitations get there first? AI recreations of a rising artist's sound will make them seem like copycats of their own work and damage their careers.
what about the auto tunes they all use 🤔
What about it?
Oh 'cause you invented everything maybe ? Never heard anything else before making music ? Then you did mimic too didnt ya...
Really? AI going to destroy these people's music careers?
Come on man!
lmfao an artist, any artist who samples other artists music is going on about ai mimicking.............................shaaaaddddap
The hypocrisy of his comments leave me speechless. And the lady whoever she is doesn't address the elephant in the room.😮 His whole generation doesn't have one creative bone , coliqtively in there wasted gene Poole!😅 At one point it was like 90% of there music had either straight out plagiarized or sampled some previous artist work. I can remember it like yesterday.... In there best colloqqial
He comes from an industry built on IP theft. His arguments might have resonance IF he made them in 1980 but remix after remix destroyed creativity a long time ago.
This is stealing someone's identity to make money. Lennon's voice wasn't used to honor him, it was a money grab. The rich and famous are so lazy they can't even be bothered to find new artist, just imitate and regurgitate classics. This is a bad use of A.I.
Its the rich stealing from the people, its called greed.
Sign 'o the times, baby... Sign o' the times. You better speak, Shaffer Chimere! It's so sad that this is where we're at, musically. AI is slowly, but surely phasing out certain channels right here on CZcams. On the music side though, it's coming... Yeah man, it's coming. AI is a symptom of the carelessness of music. Why bother paying a new "artist" that's not gon here for too long when we can use AI? Why bother paying a Brian McKnight X-Y-Z when we can do it on this computer for free? You seem to be a pure artist, Shaffer Chimere, but w/ the way things are going, it almost feels like it's all for nothing. Think about it. Hell, AI is gon replace AT (auto tune). Turn on the radio or however you consume music and pretty much everything already sounds like AI due to the excessive use of auto tune. Listen to Mariah Carey's latest concert. She legit sounds like a prerecorded computer. Music is free nowadays. AI just seems more convenient. I listen to music from the '70, '80 and '90s and I'm completely satisfied. I know it's not gon be no AI, JI, RI, QI. I know that when I listen to Mr. Al Green, it's gon be Mr. Al Green. When I listen to Ms. Kelly Price, it's gon be Ms. Kelly Price. And it's as simple as that.
Who? 😂 once your stuff goes on NOW that what i call music then its a rap
Get over it AI 🔥
AI should replace this reporter
Well all
Oh and that necklace is wayyyy to much.
lol this dudes music is nothing but samples taken from actual musicians
There is no creativity, only imitation and theft. Iroric, since most rappers and DJs never actually "compose" music. They sample other musicians' work.
Good luck with the last president he will find away help him self for money for him.
This is so dumb. You can’t stop people generating ai music. People won’t pay for music anymore.Poor little rich artist. Give me a break
AI is nothing new, it’s just copying the original