Elizabeth Oldfield: Why I lost my faith and found it again
Vložit
- čas přidán 20. 05. 2024
- Elizabeth Oldfield is a writer, broadcaster and host of The Sacred podcast. Her new book 'Fully Alive' examines how modern life can be informed by ancient wisdom, including a fresh look at the 'Seven Deadly Sins'.
Belle and Justin speak to Elizabeth about her own spiritual journey, wisdom, our common life and the things that most deeply bind us.
Elizabeth Oldfield: www.elizabetholdfield.com/
For Re-Enchanting: www.seenandunseen.com/podcast
There’s more to life than the world we can see. Re-Enchanting is a podcast from Seen & Unseen recorded at Lambeth Palace Library, the home of the Centre for Cultural Witness. Justin Brierley and Belle Tindall engage faith and spirituality with leading figures in science, history, politics, art and education. Can our culture be re-enchanted by the vision of Christianity?
This channel is distinguished by its high production quality, the professionalism of its hosts, and the appeal of its interviewees. I'm surprised it doesn't have hundreds of thousands of subs.
Thank you. This is just what I needed to hear this morning. Before I started listening I had been reflecting about how withdrawn I have become since the Lockdowns - which were stricter and went on longer in Scotland than England. I was staggered how compliant people were and how they seemed to take pride in being more cautious than the reckless English. It has left me feeling isolated and and guarded in talking even to friends I've known for years, especially at my church. Going to Mass is now more a trial than a solace. I can recognise some of this is my own pride and lack of charity and have confessed it but it hasn't shifted anything - a big dose of Sloth/Acedia I fear. Sounds as if I need to get Elizabeth's book but as she said I basically know what I should do already but it's easier to listen to another podcast or read (or just buy) another book....
Go to God for the grace He freely offers. Immerse yourself in scripture, seeking Him and the power He gives to follow Him. You're not on your own relying on will power.
Thank you for another wonderful and enriching conversation. 🎉
'Safe space' whining.
What a wonderful conversation!
Thank you very much... ☝️😎
I’ve been thinking about whether I should write anything on here. Because my desire is to be encouraging and build people up.
And for most of this lovely interview there is such a rich and deep encouragement to so many. And here comes the however- the legalism that seeps into a lot of this interview is disturbing and for new and susceptible believers I think there is a vaneer placed over a strong legalism that people need to be extremely careful of.
One of my main observations was the conversation about the rich young ruler. There are absolutely appropriate caveats that are given to the interaction Jesus has. That are very important.
1. Jesus always responded to the person and their situation.
2. This is not a reason to sell all you have.
3. It is to do with pride and not avarice.
The language that Elizabeth uses at certain points is also very enticing but extremely condemning and without grace and personal responsibility to God. It’s not a one size fits all.
What you guys are doing is fabulous and I’m so thankful for the rich and deeply encouraging conversations you folks are having with enlightened folks like Elizabeth. So I am loath to point this out, but it was deeply concerning.
I do recommend speaking with Andrew Fellows at some point who has a wonderful nuanced and brilliant approach to the meaning crisis. He used to work at L’abri in Greatham. In fact Jim Paul who is the director there would also be a brilliant interviewee.
May you have every continued success and bless many with the wonderful work you are doing!
Truly, from a big fan!
These were IMHO 3 very posh people who agreed on absolutely everything for 1 hour. When people agree on absolutely every single point for that long, it is not a real honest conversation or at least not a really enriching one, but just an exercise in agreeableness. When all participants are from a very particular socioeconomic class, then it is an opportunity lost to engage with someone from another socioeconomic background.
Its a good point but what would you have the hosts do then? Only invite guests on from a totally different class background? I would think that the nature of this podcast is quite self-selecting in terms of class background. Being a religion and society writer/thinker is itself typically quite middle class or upper middle. Not something a working class single mother on benefits is going to have much time or cultural capital for.
The other problem with critiquing someone on the basis of class is it tends to ignore what it is that they are actually saying... investigating the value (or otherwise of that) on the basis of its own merits.
🙏Lovely to listen to ..🧡
Her points on avarice seem very blinkered in a sense. Many of us will never have the dilemma of whether or not to upgrade to an island kitchen unit thing or indulge in yet another pair of expensive shoes, or attend endless Pilates classes. I respect her many viewpoints and general cause though but as ever, there is a class dimension missing here.
Avarice manifests as consumerism and that affects almost everyone.
As someone new coming to Christianity, I can't understand the nervousness around talking about sin. The fact that we're fallen, virtually incapable of not sinning - and that's why we need a Saviour - is comforting to me.
Theologians have been thinking and writing about this for a VERY long time. She was showing respect by acknowledging that fact and then making her point.
I am all for preaching against consumerism and for frugality and living an unpretentious life (something I try to practice), but she lost me at climate crisis. The poor benefit from cheap abundant energy too and will be the ones to suffer the most from the net zero type policies that people who utter the words climate "crisis" typically advocate for.
In the event that we do nothing about the climate crisis then the poorest will also be the ones who suffer most with that.
the way the individual is defined is wrong but it doesn’t mean that the individual does not exist...
when my son was born, i was struck by how complete he is as a human being... as an individual, he is complete... he doesn’t need me to add anything to him... so the individual exists...
however, that individual encounters many other individuals... for those encounters to be meaningful and therefore stable, meaning is negotiated by necessity...
Clever and nice woman
Yes! to all of that, and noo
Yes the phrase “you are Enough” is a lie. I agree that we are designed for community but biblically God sees us as individuals: Jesus left the 99 to go after the 1.
I've said in sermons to my congregation that God sees us as individuals but makes us into persons. I think this gets at what she is about here.
To say we are "designed" raises a lot of red flags for me, as does, "there's no such thing as an individual". Why do we always speak in binaries? And, the intergenerational "transfer of knowledge" glosses over the fact that, in the context of religion, this means ideological conditioning from a very young age. Brainwashing at worst. Not "knowledge transfer". The irony here is that, self-evidently, Elizabeth is an incredibly individual character who speaks from her personal experience. She is not speaking for a group, organisation or community. She is not constrained by communal requirements.
Avarice ... why are we ignoring it?" Because the conditions we live in, politically, economically, make it extremely difficult to do otherwise. For example, I have never owned property, even a small flat. Or a car. I have no insurance. I could go on. If I had to live my life (I'm 71) again, would I do it differently? Maybe. For sure, those of us who have not indulged in a bit of avarice are worse off for it. We struggle harder to survive, to square the circle of survival and greed.
Anything not wishy washy on this, either from hosts or contributor, please share timestamp. Hopefully not being a troll, just curious to find the gems.
I respect the straightforwardness of your comment, only thing is someone’s “wishy washy” might be someone’s “intriguing”
@@InfinityProTeam true, but ultimately The Brothers Karamazov isn't Harry Potter.
@@conspirisi ahah fair, I haven’t read either, would you recommend?
@@InfinityProTeam I've not read either so you've got me ;-).
Goodness me I was so hooked on what she shared. Maybe slightly because of how strikingly beautiful she is