Why did Germany invade the Soviet Union? The Truth of Operation Barbarossa
Vložit
- čas přidán 22. 08. 2024
- You're being lied to about why Germany invaded the Soviet Union. It wasn't as simple as most would have you believe.
Telegram: t.me/zoomerhis...
Instagram: ZoomerHistorian
Join telegram channel, it's in the description
You cannot produce these videos fast enough for me! Frankly I’m surprised this channel hasn’t been shut down by now…? It isn’t just the lack of propaganda and better objectivity, but rather the incredibly detailed research for the truth surrounding historical events. I have been a student of the circumstances surrounding the events in Europe from 1917 to 1945 for over 20 years. No subject has opened my eyes more than my pursuit for a greater understanding of world war 2, no subject has been more propagandized, lied about and used for political/ideological reasons. I cannot believe how naive I was when I first began trying to understand it all….it has made me much more critical of history in general.
Fr, war is about logistics and supplies, not evil crazy dictators on drugs, and still propaganda blows that trumpet.
So true king
One of my favorite quotes has always been amateurs talk tactics professionals talk logistics. My family are Czechs so I got no love for the third Reich but the idea that the Germans were out to enslave humanity like in The Man in The High Castle. I've gotten into so many arguments with people when they'd say something as ridiculous as well if it wasn't for the United States we'd all be speaking German. They neither had the manpower, materials, or even the slightest intention of crossing the Atlantic to invade our country. Japan was way worse than Germany was in World War II but people have a bad habit of glossing over some of the stuff they did. Most people can tell you what the Holocaust is but when you ask them about Nanking you get that blank fluoride stare.
@@rc59191 Then have conversations with more knowledgable people.
@@rc59191 Japan was forced into war with the US. Poland's regional aggression against Germany was used by the United Kingdom to start the war in Europe. China's regional aggression against Japan is what did so in the Pacific. It's from the same proxy war playbook that we have seen again and again, most recently with Russia and Ukraine.
Imperial power uses a weak and small country to provoke the larger target power to attack, such that imperial war against the target can be justified.
So what did 'regional aggression' did China commit in the 1930's that provoked Japan? It couldn't be a direct threat- china didn't have a navy to speak of, their airforce was equally as weak and the Chinese army couldn't walk on water.
This video confirms it for me... this is by FAR the best WWII history channel by a mile in 15 minutes you absolutely demolish all the lies modern historians/media etc. Have propagated about the war. Great job!
Paton was right
Real
But America is the problem herself today.
@@xv12commander(((America)))
Yessir. Now history has changed russia is on the right side of history right now ad nato is causing issues
George S Patton? Which Paton?
Based 💪🏻
Thanks!! 😁
Thank you for your work. Great video.
Thanks a lot brother, appreciate that
For any incoming sourcebros seething like all my other videos my primary source was Stalin's war by Sean McMeekin, go complain to him!
Source?
Just own it and say it was revealed to you in a dream.
I may just have to, some of the comments on other videos are so stinky
Great book
So true
Cool video, learned a lot from this. Gonna definitely do some personal research on this, sub deserved
Glad to help brother, thanks very much
REMINDER TO EVERYONE: DOWNLOAD THESE VIDEOS EXTERNALLY BEFORE THIS CHANNEL GETS SHUT DOWN!!!
It's been up for over a year and it's still up, and it's still bull sh*t.
@@daviddavison2582ok Davidcuck
@@daviddavison2582 You can't prove any of it wrong.
@@daviddavison2582 explain why it's bullshit then. I'm always curious
Why are you surprised about Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact? Soviet leaders knew they were not ready for the war, so they tried to win time until country would finish industrializing.
The world was shocked that the communists and anti-communists had allied.
@@mariussielcken fascism is not anti-communism. It never was as its roots are in it. Fascism always saw itselves more as an alternative to communism than an opposition.
Fascism is anti-anarchist if anything. Thats why the most vocal anti-fascists are anarchists. The thing about the nazis was that they were specifically anti-bolshevik due to being anti-semitic.
@@miniaturejayhawk8702 Finally, a smart person
Great video, as always.
Thank you very much my friend 😁
Thank you so much for producing videos that are full of actual history and facts, not blind propaganda. I've watched a good amount of your videos and I've got to say that while i do disagree with a few things that you've said in a few of them, you are not a blind dumb lemming and I've learned a few things from your channel. I hope you keep making these videos, because as a western American/ European society, we need more people to wake up from this nightmare that's in our world today. Thanks again for all your hard work on these videos.
Another great video. Keep up the great work mate.
Thank you so Michu for this video. I’m so tired of people saying Germany invaded the USSR for no reason
Good no np great video. One thing though man I would suggest slowing down on your dialog you talk very fast
Ignore the cringe brainwashed haters, good informative video. Some things could be debated and others are a matter of perspective, but overall I believe this is closer to the truth than the mainstream shite
Thank you my friend, no one source will ever get it 100% right and no one knows for sure completely what happened or what everyone in the past was thinking, but I hope I did a better job than the mainstream here painting an overall picture
Today I discovered your channel. I have you say it is gold. Back up your videos in case CZcams takes them down, you know, the censorship nowadays is horrible.
My friend, your videos are without peer. Top marks. Respects and thanks from Canada. Keep it up!
My grandmother, who lived through the war, also told the story of how the Soviets built an airfields after the occupation in 1940. Local residents were gathered, ordered to build airfields and then killed. Why should an airfield be built closer to the enemy's territory?
You are a Light in the Dark, bro. Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your pursuit of The Truth.❤🎉
Another bänger video
Thanks bro! 😁
I am fascinated by WW2 and the history behind it. I've seen a lot of different documentaries about the eastern front and continue to learn new facts. This video nailed it! It validates a lot of the points that i've made to friends before.
I tell them that a war with stalin and hitler was inevitable and if hitler had not attacked first then stalin would have attacked later and swallow europe
Germany in a way, saved western europe from being dominated by the bolsheviks and served as a buffer.
WW2 started as the two biggest kids on the block having to fight over dominance basically
I'd really like to understand why the Allies were so hell bent on defeating Germany, both in WW1, but especially WW2.
Knowing that Wallstreet the US and Britain had helped Trotsky to power, as well as the Lend Lease act to USSR, there was incentive to have a USSR for reasons I'm not quite aware of. But why Germany had to be crushed, I don't quite undertand, apart from someone not wanting Germany to be a central competing force in Europe, and of course Jewish groups wanting to stay and play an important role.
I've heard that NS money wealth creation out-competed the newly created fiat system of the US Federal Reserve, and in time Germany would have become wealthier and more dominant.
The same goes for the current crisis with Russia, Germany suffered a great loss from gas trade being cut off from Russia.
Follow the money is my thesis. I just want to understand.
Becouse look who financed them and who their friends are, after ww1 Churchill was broke and in dept his failure like the one in Gallipoli brought him shame he got payed to enter a war with Germany, and Roosevelt was literally pro Stalin and Soviets after he came to power the US recignized the Soviet government as legit ww2 was the war to make the world safe for communism, that's what Yuri Bezmenov also stated a former KGB agent.
Fir WW1, great Britain did not want industrial competition from Germany. Lyndon LaRouche claimed that Germany and Turkey were working on rail lines to asia which would have short curcuited Britain's control of the sea. It's likely thenZimmermann Letter was a British intelligence fake to rile up the US public against Germany.
Ron Paul Institute editorial stated that German and Russian ties were getting closer through energy for technology trade before the Ukraine War. A Germany with cheap energy is definitely a threat to US hegemony, so something had be done to stop it....
anglosphere didnt want any competitors.
Thanks for 100 likes 😁
Great video Sir 😊
2:25 is that an early appearance of Super Mario?
Maybe you could talk about Dantzig, Poland.. the massacre of the German population there that ultimately led to the German invasion of Poland.. and how Poland was used by GB and allies to trigger the war (mass murdering over 53000 ethnic Germans in Polands Dantzig (Pruissian land given to Poland after WO1..) and declaring war on Germany.
What??? There was no massacre of Germans by Poles... lol, wow
@@mitchrichards1532 Go do some digging.. absolutely happend.
@@marinavis6813 No, it didn't.... Name a source, just one.
Great video, promoted on History Memes !
Brother you ARE history memes!
fantastic vid
I love Latvia!!!!! 🇱🇻
Fake latvianer
You steal my comment???
@@gcsehistorylessons8465 Boomer
@@gcsehistorylessons8465 The Nation which to this day holds SS parades with government support and had the highest number of SS recruits of any foreign country? 😳
@@gcsehistorylessons8465 You’re talking in a thread with my Latvian wife who has my half-Latvian son you absolute clown 💀💀💀
Based
Thank you very much brother
@@gcsehistorylessons8465- You mean like you bimps and comis also cherry picking to make your side look like the good guy😂
@@gcsehistorylessons8465 Everyone cherry picks history to some extent, we have a few sources to go by and many of the even contradict at times because different people in Germany had different ideas. It isn’t like everyone in the party was some psychopathic maniac who wanted mass genocide when Hitler himself stated he just wanted his German land back in mienkampf. It is however cherrpicked to say the only reason Hitler invaded Eastern Europe was for some massive chunk of land spanning to the Uralic.
I love hearing all the Leftists talk about what heroes the Communists are. Many think that “anti-fascist” means “pro-freedom” rather than “pro-Communist”. LOL Those sweet, summer children. 😆
The tragedy of our time is that smooth brains cant comprehend Hitler was a leftist. Socialist policies all around back then, germans didnt even have the right to own private property, it was a centrally planned economy. The only difference to marxist communists is that one divides by race while the other divides by class. You fell hook line and sinker for their propaganda.
Sad times.
I'm loving this channel, lots of based content and real stuff which others won't talk abt, and it matches a lot with my ideals abt EU
How do you find these sources! I'd love to read what you do.
Stalin’s war by Sean Mcmeekin was the primary source for this video, I’m not sure how I come across them! I just sort of naturally discover them
@@ZoomerHistorian Based
Excellent
Thanks Jeffrey, love your work
First video I watched from you and immediately subbed!
Allies invading Soviet Union in 1940 was either the most intense fever dream Allied leaders ever devised or more likely completely made up. Britain had almost no army in the beginning of 1940, they managed to scrape together only 380k men to France by May.
The Red Army mobilized up to 5.3 million men by September 20th 1939, they demobilized later and by September 1st 1940 'only' 3.4 million men were on active duty.(Source Viktor Suvorov - The Chief Culprit) Although even he parrots the idea that Allies were seriously planning an invasion of Soviet Union and Soviets started to demobilize already in January 1st 1940 once the Allied intentions of not invading somehow became clear.
Germany and Soviet Union together would have rolled both the French and the British empires with ease.
They fed these Baku and Murmansk invasions to Finland all throughout February 1940, intensifying the fantasies after Soviet Union offered peace to Finland, trying to keep the Soviet invasion of Finland going. They pressured Finland quite heavily to stop negotiating for peace and gave false promises of help. Göring told Finland to accept the Soviet peace offer 1 day before Soviets gave the offer on February 23rd 1940. The British and the French governments were very against the peace between Finland and Soviet Union, as was almost the whole Soviet leadership, except for some reason Stalin. (Source Finland's Foreign Minister during the winter war 'Väinö Tanner - Olin Ulkoministerinä Talvisodassa')
Can you perhaps explain everything? Like make videos about how tides work, review cars etc :-)
Now that I think back on years of history channel covering nothing but ww2 24/7 and never even a tangential glancing skimming brushing fleeting mention of 1% of what you just crammed into this video… makes it all seem more like programming than honest history.
7:12 It was Hitler who ignored the Stalin proposal to join the tripartite pact?
This is kinda confusing to me since I knew that it was Hitler who didn't respond to Stalin Proposal since he was preparing for Barbarossa.
cause this video is biased lol
I’m not saying any of this is wrong, and it’s very interesting for sure, but how come there's not a single challenging or dissenting comment?
Keep scrolling, you'll find a seething joo eventually
Because he’s not saying anything that can be legitimately denied?
@@chadplow824 other content producers are properly challenged about what they assert, whether those challenges are based on sound facts or not. I don't like producers being given a hard time unnecessarily but my best guess is that this channel has heavily curated comments.
@@theskull3838 I don’t think so. There’s plenty of comments attacking the creator and lots of name calling assuming his personal politics if you look around on all of his videos. Not too much in the way of rebuttals as far as the information that is presented though.
@@chadplow824 thank you. I'll have a look.
I have to be on adderral to keep up with this
You have to be on cocaine to believe it.
oof i imagine soviets never signed peace with finland leading to a conflict with allies and subsequent alliance with germany
Wonderful video but the reading is too fast , even the subtitles can't manage on quite a few places . They call Stalin ' darling' for example 😂
Great video. Very informative and well balanced with no bias. Thanks for making it.
youre the GOAT, man!
Lore of Why did Germany invade the Soviet Union? The Truth of Operation Barbarossa momentum 100
Why didn't the allies declare war on soviets when they invaded Poland...?
Because it was never about Poland.
It was very comfortable to just ignore this as it wouldve caused massive issues for the Allies. Pole here.
@@janys6502 Poland and its intactness were never even a consideration for the war-lusting Anglos. If they had been, Britain would have implored the Poles to cease their belligerence and aggression toward its much bigger and mightier neighbor.
As soon as your country had fallen, the casus belli against Germany was manifest and it was no longer of any interest.
@@noimnotnice im not sure what you mean by war lusting. Germany already annexed Austria, part of cze, dismantled cze and took memel. They broke the treaty of versallies many times. The british guaranteed Poland, saying that IF germany ATTACKS THE COUNTRY, they only then would they declare war. The reason for Polish inactness against russia was because of lack of any troops to hold them off, almost all of our army was busy defending against germany. Also, what are your sources?
@@janys6502 Germany "broke" Versailles, the Allies never abided by it in the first place.
The only policy that was even controversial at the time was making was remained of the Czech state into a protectorate. However, Hacha asked for it, and the Brits allowed it.
Unifying German lands into one Reich was only natural, and nearly everybody at the time agreed.
Now, stop and ask yourself: WHY would Britain guarantee Poland, when it 1) didn't have the means to back them up in any way, 2) the German case was completely just and reasonable? It was for having a casus belli against Germany. Again, they could have pushed for the peaceful resolution that Hitler pursued. But peace wasn't in their interest.
This "wag-the-dog" policy of proxy wars has been employed in Chan-Kai-Shek China, Kuwait, Serbia, and modern Ukraine.
Poland, just so by the way, took chunks of Czechia when it was opportune, there are records of nearly two hundred border raids into Reich territory, but most importantly: it occupied Danzig and mistreated the Germans within its majority German parts.
Hitler's ultimatum was to end the occupation and the mistreatment of Germans. He didn't even request an immediate resolution of a transit between Danzig and the Reich. Nor did he want any pre-1914 German lands back.
Yes, Poland incited a German invasion, and Britain used it to declare war, which it escalated into the Second World War with the attempted invasion of Norway - a *neutral* country. That's what Britain's warmongers wanted, and Poland had no more weight for them at that point.
Oh really why america attack on iraq ???? Afghanistan ????
But Hitler himself stated quite clearly he wanted living space in the East.
Then why did he want to create Slavic puppet states as buffers to Russia?
Yes but not in the soviet union
East of Germany is Soviet union essentially@@whysoserious5925
I was under the impression Hitler wanted Soviet lands because of the fertility of those lands. I recall sometime after the invasion they literally started shipping train carts full of Soviet earth back to Germany
@@dwellner502
The doctrine for the East wasn't decided upon in Berlin. Some wanted that the Brest-Litovs is upheld, others wanted to colonize, in the end they couldn't decide. The whole reason for the invasion is Stalin parking 5 million soldiers and 25000 tanks on the German border while also refusing Berlin's offer for the Union to join the Axis. This convinced Germany that the Union was planning to attack them while they fought the British.
I didnt learn this in history class
You should give your videos musik in the background to keep the viewers immersed and keep their concentration
This is very good, but please talk slower
thanks for at least admitting that national socialism and communism are completely different
Germans had NO legal right to private property after the Reichstagbrandverordnung 1933. There were extensive socliast policies such as retirement benefits for the aging, wage subsidies for the poor, landreforms, etc. They had the biggest union in history and a central planned economy.
The only difference is that one divides by class while the other divides by race. They went to war over who was the predominant socialist, the "real" one.
He made the soviet stronger and more united by attacking them, that was the mistake...
Nah the British and US did with their lend lease
@@weary_millennial-jw6oo it's naive to undervalue the russians, they are a great culture and people, second maybe only to the germans. Only that communism ruined everything as it does with everything it touches...
Lend lease only arrived after Soviets defeated Operation Barbarossa.
@@weary_millennial-jw6ooLend lease arrived when the tides of war was turned at stalingrad, so no
@@weary_millennial-jw6oo No, lend-lease to USSR was tiny and 3 times smaller than lend-lease to Britain.
Lenin didn’t believe in permanent revolution. That was Trotsky’s idea, not Lenin’s. So you were wrong about that.
What is your source for all this just wondering?
Stalin’s war by Sean McMeekin is the best for this topic
@@ZoomerHistorian thanks man love your stuff. You’ve probably red-pilled 1000s of normies. Keep up the good fight
Thanks mate, although I don’t view myself as a big redpiller or whatever, I’m just talking about history!
@@ZoomerHistorian yeah but telling true history does lead to a lot of red pilling even if it’s unintentional
Very true!
The narrator is speaking much too fast. Absorbing & understanding what he is explaining is difficult...
Definitely a refreshing view from the usual normie takes.
you're a great writer and researcher but the narration is a hard listen..
10:26 Name of song?
Some remix of “Erika”.
is it here do I come to get listed at the fbi?
Indeed good sir welcome. Welcome.
4k video downloader wont let me dl this video. I would like to archive it in case it gets deleted. Help.
Screen Rec solves that problem for me.
I have been a long time subscriber and love your channel. But could you please slow down when you speak. You have such wonderful detailed information that I want to comprehend but you speak too fast. I’m older and I went to understand everything that you say. Thank you for putting together this channel.
You can slow down the playback using the GEAR sympol at the top.
U talk way to fast
Hossbach memorandum
i copy paste a comment from someone on tik's video on the memorandum:
"It's not just that Wikipedia needs resources and is controversial, but that Hossbach's memorandum itself has its own issues. At first Hossbach did not get permission from superiors to write the memorandum nor did he record it on the same day as the meeting (as was usually the case with all military meetings, eg Obersalzberg on 22 August 1939). In addition, no military was aware of the existence of this file.But this is not the most amazing thing. Hossbach was transferred to another location a few months later and his file was archived and forgotten. In 1943, General Count Kirchbach found the file by chance while searching for and producing a copy and gave it to his brother-in-law, Victor Von Martin, to keep. After the end of the war, the latter handed it over to the allied occupying authorities, who used it to produce their own version of the archive, so that it could be used against the Germans as "proof" that they were guilty in Nuremberg. Coincidentally, the original Hossbach archive and Kirchbach's copy have disappeared ... Gering in Nuremberg testified that Hitler did not call on them to talk about foreign policy but to "put pressure on General Fritsch, as Hitler was not satisfied with the rearmament of the army at that time." Admiral Raeder present confirms Gering's statement As for Hossbach himself, as an aristocrat, he was an opponent of Hitler and the National Socialist Party. In fact, he was a close friend of Ludwig Beck who was executed in 1944, as he had tried to assassinate Hitler, participating in the attempt of July 20, 1944. He was also friends with Wilhelm Canaris, the leader of Abwehr, who is known to have sabotaged conversations with leaders (eg Franco), operations (Sea Lion), exported fake files to allies to spread propaganda against Germany, etc. . but he was eventually executed for treason in 1944. Hossbach himself testified in Nuremberg that the archive is not in its original form and in fact in his memoirs he admits that at the meeting H. did not suggest any war plan! Von Martin, who handed over the copy of the archive, said in 1968 that: "The document presented in Nuremberg was constructed in such a way as to change the meaning of the original and can only be described as obscene." The British historian A.J.P. Taylor, in his book The Origins of the Second World War, in the chapter Second Thoughts, writes that he was initially captivated by this "legend of the archive"Taylor writes that the file: "contains no directives for action beyond a wish for increased armaments." And he observes that: "those who believe in political trials may go on quoting the Hossbach memorandum." The latter is rather an attack on people like TIK Haha H.W. Koch, who was a professor at York University, also demolished the file's authenticity in a 1968 article.(soryy for bad english but it was translated from google translate)
sources: And to put sources, do not say things in the air. Origins of the Second World War p. 7 It may be objected that these figures are irrelevant. Whatever the deficiencies of German armament on paper, Hitler won a war against two European Great Powers when the test came. This is to go against Maitland’s advice and to judge by what happened, not by what was expected to happen. Though Hitler won, he won by mistake - a mistake which he shared. Of course the Germans were confident that they could defeat Poland if they were left undisturbed in the west. Here Hitler’s political judgment that the French would do nothing proved more accurate than the apprehensions of the German generals. But he had no idea that he would knock France out of the war when he invaded Belgium and Holland on 10 May 1940. This was a defensive move: to secure the Ruhr from Allied invasion. The conquest of France was an unforeseen bonus. Even after this Hr did not prepare for a great war. He imagined that he could defeat Soviet Russia without serious effort as he had defeated France. German production of armaments was not reduced merely during the winter of 1940-41; it was reduced still more in the autumn of 1941 when the war against Russia had already begun. No serious change took place after the initial setback in Russia nor even after the catastrophe at Stalingrad. Germany remained with "a peace like war economy". Only the British bombing attacks on German cities stimulated H and the Germans to take war seriously. German war production reached its height just when Allied bombing did: in July 1944. Even in March 1945 Germany was producing substantially more military material than when she attacked Russia in 1941. From first to last, ingenuity, not military strength, was H’s secret of success. He was done for when military strength became decisive, as he had always known he would be. Thus I feel justified in regarding political calculations as more important than mere strength in the period before the war. There was some change of emphasis in the summer of 1936. Then all the Powers, not merely Hr, began to take war and preparations for war seriously into account. I erred in not stressing this change of 1936 more clearly, and perhaps in finding too much change in the autumn of 1937. This shows how difficult it is to shake off legends even when trying to do so. I was taken in by the Hossbach Memorandum. Though I doubted whether it was as important as most writers made out, I still thought that it must have some importance for every writer to make so much of it. I was wrong; and the critics were right who pointed back to 1936, though they did not apparently realize that, by doing this, they were discrediting the Hossbach memorandum. I had better discredit this "official record", as one historian has called it, a little further. The points are technical and may seem trivial to the general reader. Nevertheless scholars usually and rightly attach importance to such technicalities. In fact, according to Nuremberg, it was said that this file was his will! H last wishes in case he died. In modern practice, an official record demands three things. First, a secretary must attend to take notes which he writes up afterwards in orderly form. Then his draft must be submitted to the participants for correction and approval. Finally, the record must be placed in the official files. None of this took place in regard to the meeting on 5 November 1937, except that Hossbach attended. He took no notes. Five days later he wrote an account of the meeting from memory in longhand. He twice offered to show the manuscript to Hitler, who replied that he was too busy to read it. This was curiously casual treatment for what is supposed to be his “last will and testament” Hossbach’s original and Kirchbach’s copy have both disappeared. All that survives is a copy, perhaps shortened, perhaps “edited”, of a copy of an unauthenticated draft. It contains themes which H. also used in his public speeches: the need for Lebensraum, and his conviction that other countries would oppose the restoration of Germany as an independent Great Power. It contains no directives for action beyond a wish for increased armaments. Even at Nuremberg the Hossbach memorandum was not produced in order to prove Hr’s war guilt. That was taken for granted. What it "Proved", in its final concocted form, was that those accused at Nuremberg - Goering, Raeder, and Neurath - had sat by and approved of Hitler’s aggressive plans. It had to be assumed that the plans were aggressive in order to prove the guilt of the accused. Those who believe the evidence in political trials may go on quoting the Hossbach memorandum. They should also warn their readers (as the editors of the Documents on German Foreign Policy for example do not) that the memorandum, far from being an “official
@@d.k8746 I'm pretty sure TIKhistory addressed some of these claims
They did have ambitions to occupy Eastern Europe, I wouldn't justify Germany
It was the stupidest mistake on their behalf. Who on Earth would start war on two fronts? Didn't they learn anything from WW1? Soviets survived because Japanese were too chicken to attack when the right moment came.
Seems you missed the part in the video where Russia would have attacked later if Germany did not attack first.
Japan attacked the Soviet Union. The Japanese were pushed back. (Battles of Khalkhin Gol)
Japan was unable to defeat China. They were not strong enough to wage a war on two fronts.
@@JUAN_OLIVIER You missed the part that Germany had no resources to defeat Russia by aggression
@@slawawacker in 1941 Japanese ambassador to Russia even warned those dumb Gerrys that it's an belief they have that they can beat Russia
I guess this guy has excuses for Hitler invading Alsace Lorraine , Austria , and Czechoslovakia to , Poor little misunderstood Adolf so full of peace being forced into war by all these evil countries that surrounded Germany .
Sister is ironically starting to get it...
@@omarrojo9484 What does that mean ? who is sister ? and what is she getting?
I fail to see your point. Austria and the Sudentenland were German lands who wished to be reunited with Germany, and what remained of the weakened Czech state after the Munich conference voluntarily agreed to become a German protectorate. Alsace Lorraine was not even touched until the British and French declared war on Germany.
@@LizardlandArcanium Oh by that logic he should invaded France to since their origins were also German , the point is these countries didn't vote to become part of Germany , Hitler just took them by force , and that is not how things are done. Oh and the first thing Hitler marched into was Alsace Lorraine in the mid thirties
Austria and Czechoslovakia were annexed almost without a shot fired
All you said is pure bullshit
I disagree communism and nazism/fascism being opposite ideologies. They all have the same root and are two faces of the same coin.
Then you are wrong
@@Projolo it is there in the name of both. Use your brain!
Nah, liberalism/neoconservatism and communism are two faces of the same jewish coin
@@horeageorgian7766 If you read Marx you would notice that one of his goal was to redefine Socialism.
So National Socialism used a different definition of the word meanwhile Socialism nowadays uses Marx's new definition.
The democratic people’s Republic of Korea is a democracy then because it’s in the name?
To your original point, there are extremely stark differences between the two. Property rights, nationalism, conservative moral values, just to name three as I’m in a rush, happy to talk further
Man, you have taught me so much 🫱🏻🫲🏼🫡 I have always known WW2 was a complete lie inherently but haven’t dug into it enough. Well done!
Based
Lore of Why did Germany invade the Soviet Union? The Truth of Operation Barbarossa momentum 100
I love Latvia!!!!! 🇱🇻
Hey I don’t get it
Bāzēta latviete?
Jā 😁
@@ZoomerHistorian cringe
@@richyie2754 What the heck!