Russia's S-500 Targets F-35 and F-22: Can Stealth Be Defeated?
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 07. 2024
- Tensions escalate in Ukraine as Russia deploys its most advanced air defense system, the S-500, to Crimea. This move comes in direct response to a series of Ukrainian strikes on the occupied peninsula.
Ukrainian forces launched a series of attacks starting June 10th, reportedly hitting an S-400 system near Dzhankoi, followed by two S-300s near Chornomorske and Yevpatoria. Two days later, they allegedly destroyed the radars of those systems. This surge in attacks is likely fueled by the recent acquisition of long-range ATACMS missiles.
Ukrainian intelligence downplays the S-500 deployment, calling it "experimental," and casting doubt on its true operational effectiveness. However, its arrival in Crimea injects a new layer of complication to the already tense situation. Codenamed "Prometheus," this system promises to counter even the most sophisticated stealthy jets and hypersonic missiles, posing a clear and direct threat to Ukrainian forces.
But can it truly neutralize America's prized F-22 Raptor and F-35 Joint Strike Fighter jets, which Ukraine hopes to acquire in the future?
_________________________________________________________________________
Attributions:
1. By Tech. Sgt. Ben Bloker, United States Air Force - www.jble.af.mil/photos/mediaga..., Public Domain, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
2. By www.dodmedia.osd.mil, Copyrighted free use, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
3. By Senior Airman Kayla Newman/633rd Air Base Wing, US Air Force - 160424-F-KB808-511 & www.af.mil/News/Photos.aspx?ig..., Public Domain, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
4. By Frans Berkelaar - F-35 Lightning II - Leeuwarden Airport, CC BY 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
5. By Rob Shenk from Great Falls, VA, USA - F-22 Raptor, CC BY-SA 2.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
6. By Major Ofer, Israeli Air Force רס"ן עופר, חיל האוויר הישראלי - Israeli Air Force, CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
7. By ShukriH - Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index...
8. By Армія Інформ - armyinform.com.ua/2021/07/ono..., CC BY 4.0, commons.wikimedia.org/w/index... - Věda a technologie
Remember F-117 Stealth was shot down by Serbia using an old SA-3 missile from 1960s era
Because they knew they flight path of the plane and caught it while it was landing when it’s gear were down and even then they had to do some seriously jenky stuff to shoot it down
It was honestly lucky and the guy that did it said he probably couldn’t do it twice
@@7gmeister Bullshit, they picked it up when the F117 opened its weapons doors, preparing to launch munitions!. All stealth aircraft are vulnerable at such time. But, yes, they did know it's flight path - because they had already identified it on Radar from previous flights but were unable to get lock-on. Once they opened the weapons doors it was game on!
@7gmeister bla bla blaaa, not one was fall. Few of them are, and one B2 (Spirit of Missouri), falls on NATO territories.
@@7gmeisterThat’s a load of shit.. Land where? Serbia 🇷🇸 Olympic Park ❓ GTFO
In that time F117 is only use as bomber but F35 and 22raptor has long range detection radar and use steath tech,before air defence detect the thier air to surface missiles hit S 4oo or S 5oo so useless detection
The F35 cannot even fly in bad weather - so there’s that
No cap?
Su57 can't even fly solo without fighter jet support, and russia calls it "stealth"😂
@@Mk19-xc9bm neither can the F-22 so what is your point?! lol 😂
Do you really think that’s true?
Wishful thinking
Even if it is no missile defense system can take it down
@@7gmeister Tell me what defense system did a F35 face?
S-400/S-500 will hit F-22/F35 100%.
S400 can't even protect itself from ATACMS ,what do you expect from S500propaganda
@@Mk19-xc9bms 400 can hit atacms on 28th Oct 2023 it intercepted atacms yeah I agree s400 destroyed by atacms when s400 system is not operational it intercepted storm shadow missile even us is against it
@@Mk19-xc9bmdo you think patriots can defend it from an artillery rocket or project tile or a simple drone attack. 😂
@@Mk19-xc9bmor a HARM for that matter
@Mk19-xc9bm f22 and f35 are propaganda. Stealth fairytale propaganda.
Every weapon system from the US has been exceptional until it's deployed in Ukraine
Himars made Russians run from occupied territories, Patriot made Su34's run to safer airports. More than exceptional.
@joehiggins8659 Well, how many of those systems have been destroyed by Russia?
@@joehiggins8659 Dope made you run from reality. The Russians withdrew from occupied territories the first time because they thought they were signing a peace deal. The second time to consolidate and train more troops for a longer mission type because they'd deployed a small force to get Zelensky to the table and they have never been a country that puts higher value on territorial gains than overall mission parameters and conservation of resources. Unlike Ukraine who got run out of all the territory it recovered a short time later at 5X the casualty rate of Russia. The Patriot is a defensive missile. It poses zero threat to enemy aircraft on the ground based on proximity because it is not a surface to surface attack missile. How are you talking and don't know that?
Himars was being jammed fairly shortly after it showed up on the battlefield just like Western JDAMs (even reported in Western news) and Kinzhals took care of Patriot batteries that couldn't stop anything faster than the supersonic Iskanders which share certain parts with them, causing Ukraine to lie about what they'd hit over and over despite the Patriot batteries disappearing. Sorry if that hurts.
@@joehiggins8659 LOL The Patriot has not shot a single thing down in all the years they've had it, not even that old Scud the US hilariously lied about claiming they shot it down, until the truth came out, if you read Wikipedia it's a comical laugh, it's so full of US propaganda.
The Himars the US claimed for years couldn't be shot down, until we watched Russia do exactly that, and are there any left?
@@joehiggins8659 Why is it, you Americans always talk about subjects you know nothing about? Let's analyse the USA's (real military capabilities), today? Because it's a horror story for the Americans, in all honesty.
Over these last 25 years, they've been out thought (right across the military board), they've been significantly out-built, and they've been technically beaten, hands down, by both Russia, and China, (who are banging out modern hi-tech, hi-quality, military hardware in all areas of their military today).
Even though, much is largely defensive, it's also tactically offensive, and being done with a very focused and real analytic understanding of where they need to be at various stages of their military advancement.
Although we actually know, very little, (in all truth), what they've allowed us to see, there's nothing I could single out, and criticize, even if I wanted too. So far, everything has been completely logical.
A great question, that really points out today's military power, (realities), is, what does the USA lead the world in today, concerning anything military? And the answer to that question, is, absolutely nothing!
For example, In today's world of hi-tech, Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit, really means, all Navy's, (including the USA's), without the ability to defend against these missiles, are in effect, obsolete today.
Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile, though inferior in way of operational range - 1000kms. It can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships, making it deadly to any carrier in the world. (Russia also have the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks, Anti-Ship missiles). We know that neither the US, or the UK, have a destroyer, (or any other means), able to defend against any of these modern hi-tech, ASM's today! Seeing, the USA's Navy as pretty much obsolete in today's world.
We only need to look how far the US jets can travel, it's approx, about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. Seeing the US unable to deploy any carrier close enough, to reach any inland target, and then get back again. Anywhere inside 1700 km's, they're sunk, they're toast, they're history.
This is also why, when we hear the USA "shouting out" how they're sending a carrier to the South China Sea, (as some kind of imagined "propaganda threat" toward China).
Only, when looking at the GPS positioning, of any US carrier in the SCS, they're never see closer than 2500 km's from Chinas mainland! It's more commonly known as hot air, "bluster".
Then, when looking at another of the most important areas of today's militaries - (Electronic Warfare)?
We again find, the Russians are literally decades ahead. Russia have the GaN MMICs, the krasukha, the murmansk-BN, and Magrav technology (NATO: Khibiny) developed by Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (called “a modern-day Nikola Tesla”).
We can also, say for sure, this EW hardware is super impressive, as we've no answer to it, and we've also seen this E/W in action, on at least 4 occasions we know of. Obviously claims denied by the USA, only if untrue, then I'm just left asking why we saw the response from the USA, basically confirming these events?
1) In 2013, we've seen a Russian SU-24 fly repeatedly around and directly over the USS Cook, leaving the Cook helpless to defend itself.
2) In 2014, we've seen a Russian SU-24 (flying at an altitude of only 10 feet), fly directly at, and straight over the USS Ross, eleven times, with the Ross completely unable to prevent It or respond to It.
3) As Russian forces arrived In Syria in 2015 we had many reports of US/NATO/Israeli radar being scrambled, leaving them unable to communicate or offer any response to the Russian forces. As one report said, the silence from the West was deafening!
4) In March 2015, a further related report notes. Federation submarine naval forces attacked with their advanced electronic defensive weapons the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) causing it to turn and struggle to the coast of Britain (to the amazement of the public). Where she remained for 9 days undergoing Intensive major re-wiring.
It's believed the Russian electronic warfare pods (NATO: Khibiny) were used in a Russian trial of this technology for its submarine fleets.
White House spokesman Josh Earnest, who said of the encounter with the Cook... This incident is entirely inconsistent with the professional norms of militaries operating in close proximity with each other in international waters. E/C measures taken by the Russian Federation are completely unacceptable.
To which the Russian MoD replied... Frankly speaking, [we] do not understand the reason for such a painful reaction of our American colleagues, as the principle of freedom of navigation for the US destroyer, (which is staying in close proximity to a Russian naval base in the Baltic Sea), does [not] at all cancel the principle of freedom of flight for Russian aircraft testing Russian defensive systems.
When we look at another of the most important areas of these militaries today, (Ground Warfare)?
We find that Russian troops, with reserves, outnumber the USA, and we must also understand, that any attack on Russia, would immediately see China join the conflict, then outnumbering the USA in the millions today.
But, also, and more to the point, what have we ever seen from any US troops, that could make anyone believe or think, they'd be any sort of threat or match, for any of these well-disciplined, well-trained, Russian troops, who are all fully bled, and they're prepared to stand and fight for their country's freedom, (seeing them fighting for all the right reasons). While any US troops, would only be fighting for attempted US tyranny.
All throughout the history of wars, we always find, that all those fighting for the right reasons, (like their own freedom), have never lost. While on the other hand, all those who fought for all the wrong reasons, like global control/tyranny, have all, not only lost, but all have been annihilated.
The Americans, would all be very wise to understand this, as we see this in every war, over and over again! Nothing will change this time, only the annihilation might be much more severe, but it must also be recognized, and said, just as deserved!
When looking at today's (Missile World)? We find, that, once again. Russia easily rules today's missile world. Russia's modern hi-tech missiles, that include hypersonic missiles, (with Russian GLONASS, GPS targeting systems), give Russia such incredible precision, the USA has nothing we can even say, compares.
And as we've all witnessed, Russia was pinpoint accurate, targeting single buildings in Syria, even seen guiding their missiles straight down chimney pots, or straight in through the front doors, and doing so from the Caspian Sea from distances of, up to 6500 km away.
Russia has also provided clear, precise footage, of all her long range missile attacks in Syria, (that we can see all came from the Russian control room online).
Russian hypersonic missiles, we all know the USA can't defend against, and Russia has many other lethal hypersonic missiles being created, and added to her arsenal on a regular basis, today.
Personally, in any upcoming war, I give the USA precisely zero chance, none, not even a little snippet of a chance, annihilation is all they'll get.
And again, it must be recognized, and said,100%, deservedly so.
Ukraine need white flags.
Certainly.
Russia needs a lot of white flags @@? as soldiers are surrendering in masse 140/220/460 in 3 days last one w/ two generals LOL @@
Yep, lots of white flags. So, how do we get our money back.
They need some high tech white flags.
Ukraine has yellow and blue on her flag might be need one more might be white?
Many countries have three colors on their flags those are red blue and white right? See United States flag, see British flag, see Russia flag, see French flag, ....
So Ukraine hopes for the F-22? Bad joke, man. The F-22 isn't even built any more and for sure the Air Force wouldn't give it to any other country. And the F-35 has yet to prove that it is a capable aircraft. It surely won't be given to Ukraine in the near future.
@der
And the sky is blue. I think this is obvious and goes without saying.
Let Ghost of Kvivv test F35 in combat.
The F-33 (I could be wrong on the number) Black Widow was better than both of them.
To be honest, I believe the F-14 and the A-10 Thunder Bolt/Wart Hog was the very best options the USA could have remained with and kept upgrading throughout the years.
The F-35 will never replace the A-10, that was just garbage from the start to support large corporations.
Let me say this, if I was a ground troop, please send a fleet of A-10's, that other trash can stay on the carrier or at the base...just my opinion....if I am in trouble, forget stealth send something with support load, I am talking many hard points...that many don't have to be sent and we would not have to wait long for them to return back.
@@gregletbetter239 The F-35 is a GREAT CAS jet (per the United States Air Force) - until it is shot down with a Glock 17.
@@ViceCoin😂😂
The F22 is a true Ace of the sky. It has 1 confirmed kill and 1 citation for taking down an air balloon.😂😂😂😂😅
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂What a joke
What’s up with the people in this comment section?
You guys are desperate to hate the F-22
Obviously you know nothing about fighters or combat
@@7gmeisterAww.."so called" expert here,shot the balloon bang bang
@@mrmichio I’m not an expert but reasonable people give respect to their enemies and give credit where credit is due
That’s how adults work
All this posturing is childish and filled with bias and hatred
I guess if my version of stealth was covered with rivets like we’re in the 1950s and I couldn’t even get the engines right maybe I’d act that way too
Probably not though
Um hwere are your Russian Stealth Fighters? oh yeah here we are 45 years after the US first fielded a Stealth fighter the Russians still doesn't have one
F-22 is the much feared balloon killer. F-35 has yet to be tested against balloons, more testing required.
both are two more stealthplanes than russia ever has produced. If you count the B2 and the F117 nighthawk, you realize how far behind the russian really are. so shut up kid.
@@hanshuber1875 someone is mad their trillion dollar "stealth" jets light up on russian radars like a christmas tree🤣🤣
@@leight420 less copium, fool less copium. When did the russian ever told the truth?
@@hanshuber1875 always, but you wouldnt know....
@@hanshuber1875F-117 was shot down by serbs 30 years ago. If US stealth technology is much beyond russian's is yet to be proven.
So, I understand your insecurity, kid.
When the F-35 flies in rainy weather, it loses all the stealth due to its coating being reactive with rain in a bad way. It's so lame.
F 35 stealth is over hyped. See how they will jump when an S400 down one of them
F-35 cannot exceed mach 1.3, otherwise its stealth coat detaches.
S 500 is a very advanced shovel
😆
lol @! they are so advances that ukraine destroyed 2 of them so far w/ $2000.00 drones Russia lost $650.0 millions USD ahhahaahah @!losers again
S-500 shot down all ATACMS in Crimea only one detonated killing civilians in Sevastopol.
Doesnt look like so. We see in crimea how "good" they are working.
@@hanshuber1875 Did you know a Ukrainian Mig-29 & Su-27 were shot down mysteriously on July 3??
You mean the US strategic vision.
F-22 has partial thrust vectoring and its a discontinued aircraft. King of the sky's with no air to air kills except afew balloons.
Your information is directed towards the general public.
like abram, 22 & 35 will fail
Yeah they will fail
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL ah just jealous that Russia still doesn't have a single stealth fighter
The word stealth is not really accurate when it comes to planes. A maneuverable hypersonic missile is far more difficult to hit and 500s can hit them.
yeah, stealth is just lower radar observability
Very well considered.
According to russian papers it can hit 100% so let's believe it 😂
@@Mk19-xc9bm You believe Joey B is not senile and mRNA works and there are 57 genders, your American , right?
And yet the old Patriot missiles have shot them down.. Can't hit what you can't lock onto
Ukraine is not hoping for F 22s and F 35s. They are hoping for F 16s.
Those who own can go and test it. Someone tested F117 Night Hawk in Yugoslavia in 1999 and got an answer 😂😂😂
LoL, as if you just discovered something you think is unknown to others. That's cute.
You haven't got the faintest idea of how it happened.
@@jnisharDoesn't change the fact that it happened and he knows... Live with that😏
Don't forget Francis Gary Powers in 1960, shot down in his American state of the art U2 spy plane 👍
@@jnishar If he doesn't neither do you. Outside of what the pilot himself said, which is that one missile missed high and the other strafed his plane with shrapnel and took him out. And that's not the only F-117 that was hit by SAMs in that war it's just the one that was taken down, according to another F-117 pilot who managed to RTB after the exchange. As for this being common knowledge to everyone? That's ridiculous. Not everyone studies history or even acknowledges it. They can't even remember that Ukraine was bombing Donbass for 8 years before Russia interdicted and you're acting like they all know about an F-117 shot down 25 years ago? Come on man.
@@HerrinSchadenfreude you are telling so much bs. Dont spread this russian propaganda bs. If ukaine shelled the donbass for 8 years, you dont think its very unlikely, that they run out of shells, directly when the wars goes full scale? Less copium you fool.
When S400 can shoot down both f22 and f35 why need most sophisticated and advanced air defence system s500
Because it is designed to hit also balistic missles and eve low Orbit satelites. It's an upgrade
just in case, russia always stays 5 steps ahead of its enemies
What a foolish question😂
@@kalgstol what I mean to say is that s400 can detect and intercept both f22 & f35 then what is the use of s500? Which is the most capable air defence system in the world
Because it can't .. lies and BS isn't helping you win the war
S 500 also works with military satellites vital data which makes a great difference
simple answer NO , like when the Russian air defense system downed the F117 in Yugoslavia in 1999
Modern high-frequency radars can even detect flying insects, as well as their height and speed. What do you think a radar operator will think when he sees a bird flying at 900km/h at an altitude of 10,000 meters? An alien?
Stealth doesn't mean invisible anyways,the world has already seen the capabilities of stealth in 27th March,1999
WE WILL SEE ON THE BATTLE FIELD THE TRUE VALUE OF THOSE AIRPLANE. FOR THE TIME BEING IT ONLY PROPAGANDA
Stealth is a wet dream 🎉
How many F-22s are out there? how many are produced every year?... not that many. If you said F-15 in any variant, I would say 'yes, it could be'. F-22 will never go to any other country.
If an F-22 were to fly in ukraine, then it's gotta be the USAF.
how many su-57 are out there? how many are produced every year?... not that many LOL XD
@@pooferfish1227 nobody cares. We are talking about the F-22. USA will never give that tech to other countries.
@@pooferfish1227at least, Su57 pilot got the chance to fly over the warzone. Unlike their Murica counterpart just shot down a chinese made balloon...
Zero F-22 are produced a year, for more than a decade. From the 387 to be in service, about 60 are going to be retired. This is what I know about.
to answer to this question let's have a simulation on DCS and see what would be the outcome
Listen, listen. Russia can and is annihilating Stealth technology. The radar cross section of Shadow storm missile is the same as the one of F-35. This rocket flies extremely low (unlike f-35 or at least it will be hard for it) making it even harder to intercept. Russia blasts those in groups... None is reaching the Kerch Bridge. So, yeah, the question is clearly answered.
F 35 is like a tortoise compared with s 500 projectile....
Russia has both the hypersonic & means to defeat hypersonic. USA is struggling politically & financially chasing irrational goals. I think it's time for a wake up call for USA before it is too late.
@sina
lol you are funny. Russia can’t even take Kiev. uS is sending Ukraine F-16. Which is still a better fighter than anything Russia has….
And lol US is struggling financially? Not Russia? You are a comedian…haha!
@@jeremyj5932he is right, you are a fool
@@jeremyj5932America is 35 Trillion in debt, while Russia is solvent.
Also the American Petrol Dollar is about to collapse, while the BRICS nations take on the world's finance.
I don't know where you get your economic news from, but I'd do a little more studying if i was you 👍
@@nikfranczuk1134 he probably gets is from FOX or CNN
@BulbBunny for sure! As (pratically) all americans!
Ive never understood how the heat signature on these stealth planes can ever be 'hidden'.
They turn off the jet engines during critical phases I'd reckon.
If an aircraft is close enough for it's heat signature to be seen...it is WAY too close. One of the biggest features of fighters like the F-22 is it's standoff capability. It can target and destroy a system like the S-500 from VERY far away.
As far as I know these stealth fighters can be detected and be seen on radar but it is the targeting solution and getting a missile to actually shoot it down which is the hard part.
@@EziekKielI don't how far but I am sure it can't be beyond 600km coz it is the maximum reach of the s500
@@EziekKiel LOL @ Stand off capability? Why not tell us all about this capability you seemingly believe the F-22 has? Because the facts are, that this is something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American.
We read so many Americans, making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what, on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing
Stealth can easily be defeated. You only need a long wave radar for detection and GENERAL course aiming. When in close proximity, a missile activates its own AESA radar and tracks a stealth plane with ease from a short distance. That's why Russan missiles use the so called "double burst" systems - for the final precise last moment corrections. Strealth is a thing of a past already.
This is something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American. We read so many Americans making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing
Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in A2A combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15?, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down!
So it really is, once again, and as always, just a very silly, and meaningless remedial propaganda claim. However, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in A2A combat, and has faced off against aircraft just as capable and well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it).
But, the British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in A2A combat, that has faced off against worthy, and viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
The Americans really should be questioning, just why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
As the facts are, they've no idea what's around the corner in new modern military technologies, and with the speed we're seeing so much new hi tech, military tactical hardware, being designed, developed, and created today, it could have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works).
If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit!
Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write them off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell?
Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft.
Well 20 years the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan.
Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk.
They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
@@hotstepper887 The Su-57 is bad and sucks at stealth because if it doesnt it would mean that it can shoot down F-35s like they are fish in a barrel. Due to IRST, higher speed, range, manuvarability and longer ranged missiles. There fore it MUST suck. Getting western experts to admit their aircraft are expensive failures is like trying to make a cat go vegan.
The f22 was no excitement to the rafale 9to1 and even the eurofighter beat it 4 to3 in nato training fights videos are online on you tube so why so much imagine nonsense talk??
Ukraine for f22?? Thats like giving a kid a lambo so that he can flex his new car at their school and he wont be bullied anymore
It's not Ukraine that's targeting Crimea, they don't have that technology nor knowledge
F-35 is absolutely no match for S-500. Nothing more to be said, once S-500 locks on it game over.
heee ok, who has better wheelbarrow?...heeheee or slingshot?...trala-la-la-la oops ? f-117 ? hmm.
For national security the USA should never and will never give Ukraine its modern technology
No any country give his best for other, unless there are traitors in the leadership
@@Hanimichal very true
With the F22 not in Production any more, I don't think the US will be "loaning" any.
Seeing as the S-500 couldn't track and shoot down ATACMS lol it only hit the city of Sevastopol... And the US isn't selling or giving anyone the F-22 any time soon ..
F35, out of every 20 build, only 7 are airworthy....
Must be great planes 😂
F 35 has 800 documented technical problems...
They would need every f22 (with us pilots) to make any difference.
Can stealth be defeated? That's a stupid question because the answer is yes, the question is how and when? The easiest way I see to defeat stealth is by applying simple basic easy principles of an eye to a missile after you clarify the differences between a bee and a fighter jet.
This is something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American. We read so many Americans making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing!
Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in A2A combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15?, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down!
So it really is, once again, and as always, just a very silly, and meaningless remedial propaganda claim. However, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in A2A combat, and has faced off against aircraft just as capable and well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it).
But, the British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in A2A combat, that has faced off against worthy, and viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
The Americans really should be questioning, just why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
As the facts are, they've no idea what's around the corner in new modern military technologies, and with the speed we're seeing so much new hi tech, military tactical hardware, being designed, developed, and created today, it could have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works).
If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit!
Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write them off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell?
Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft.
Well 20 years the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan.
Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk.
They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
On 27 March 1999, the 3rd Battalion of the 250th Air Defense Missile Brigade of the Army of Yugoslavia, under the command of Lt. Colonel (later Colonel) Zoltán Dani, downed F-117 Air Force serial number 82-0806,[citation needed] callsign "Vega 31"[citation needed].[3][4]
The Army of Yugoslavia unit was equipped with a Yugoslav version of the Soviet Isayev S-125 "Neva" missile system (NATO reporting name, SA-3 "Goa").[1][3][5]
At about 8:15 p.m. local time, several missiles with a range of about 8 miles (13 km) were launched. According to Lieutenant Colonel Đorđe Aničić, who was identified in 2009 as the soldier who fired the missiles, they detected the F-117 at a range of about 23 km operating their equipment for no more than 17 seconds to avoid being locked on to by NATO anti-air suppression.[citation needed]
The F-117, callsign "Vega-31", was being flown by Lt. Col. Darrell Patrick "Dale" Zelko (born 30 November 1963),[3][6] an Operation Desert Storm veteran.[7] He observed the two missiles punch through the low cloud cover and head straight for his aircraft.[8] The first passed over him, close enough to cause buffeting, but did not detonate. The second missile detonated nearby, its shrapnel and shockwave causing significant damage to the aircraft and causing it to tumble out of control.[7] The explosion was large enough to be seen from a NATO KC-135 Stratotanker flying over Bosnia.[7][
Wikiped F-117 shotdown
Both of these birds would get their tails handed to them😂
America hasn’t won a war since 1812. They go make a mess of things then get spanked and leave without taking equipment with them 😂 😂😂
from a country that cant keep its commercial flights in the skies.
Well F22 and F 35 are also not tested in real combat
You can define propaganda in all type of farm
f-35 not only stealth, it can dodge too
Ukrainian pilots will never get their hands on American stealth fighters. But F-35s & F-22s might be employed by Nato to enforce a no flyzone over Ukraine, though not very likely to happen any time soon.
They hate their aircraft if they try that. They only enforce no fly zones over territory protected by SAMs with the capability of slingshots and no real air power to oppose them. In fact, that's the only time they actually go to war with their own forces. Guess that's what you decide is best after the VC helps you to over 2200 hull losses of aircraft in a war you lose including 8 B-52 losses in a single day's operation.
This is something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American. We read so many Americans making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing
Typical US propaganda, usually consists of silly falsehoods, fake misinformation claims, or just twisted truths, like the F-15, is said to be unbeaten in A2A combat? It's true (ish), only when we look at every aircraft shot down by an F-15?, we find that none had any offensive capabilities, most had little if anything defensive, many without even a basic radar, meaning, you'd be absolutely stunned, if the F-15 didn't shoot every one of them down!
So it really is, once again, and as always, just a very silly, and meaningless remedial propaganda claim. However, there is another aircraft, that's also unbeaten in A2A combat, and has faced off against aircraft just as capable and well armed as itself, (only it's not American, so you'll never hear about it).
But, the British Sea Harrier, is actually, the (only) aircraft unbeaten in A2A combat, that has faced off against worthy, and viable opposition. And that really is a huge factor, that's worth knowing, unlike the F-15 propaganda claim, that you'd be shocked if it hadn't managed.
The Americans really should be questioning, just why the US government made it illegal to sell the F-22? The US government, seemingly want it believed, that because it's so good, they don't want anyone else to have it. Yet, that actually makes no sense at all, none, not even a little sense.
As the facts are, they've no idea what's around the corner in new modern military technologies, and with the speed we're seeing so much new hi tech, military tactical hardware, being designed, developed, and created today, it could have made great sense to sell the F-22 at some stage. (If it actually works).
If it worked, they'd have been able to recoup many of the resources spent on the aircraft, if not the resources in their entirety, even a profit!
Yet, as always, there's another, and much more likely reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. If it is, just as I suspect it is, a "lemon", that was intended to be their leading front line strike aircraft, (that's failed), yet because of the cost/expense, to design and build them, they can't just write them off. So the US have then only used the F-22 for propaganda purposes? Then what better way of preventing anyone else from finding out, that it actually doesn't work, and really is a lemon, than making it illegal to sell?
Logically thinking, that's the only real possible reason the USA made it illegal to sell the F-22. It can only be, because it's a failed aircraft that was intended to be their leading front line 5th generation strike aircraft.
Well 20 years the US have had the F-22 in service, and they've been in wars the entire time, yet they've never used it, not once! And even more telling, was, after Russia arrived in Syria in 2015, the US removed every F-22 from right across the Middle East... Iraq, Tukey, UAE and Jordan.
Absolutely no doubt about it, I guarantee that we'll never see the F-22 involved in any real war scenario, or even involved in any major sortie, because it's basically junk.
They've even trashed all the infrastructure they had in place to build more of them.
yes stealth can be detected, and Russian radar are some of the best, the Russians worked on f-22/f35 technology 25yrs before US so they know some of f-22/f-35 capabilities, SU-57m is the king of supermaneuverability over any aircraft and some missile technology as Sukhoi state
In the 2 years that this war has been going on how many millions of artillery rounds have been fired?? How much air population does that translate to?
Play stupid games, Win stupid prizes.
Well, the serbs didn;t know that F-117 was invisible...
I think, at this stage, we all better by not knowing...
The F-35B, was claimed to be a stealthy single engine multirole combat aircraft, that unlike the Harrier, would be supersonic, stealthy, with modern avionics systems, and like the Harrier, would be VTOL capable. This is why the British carriers were at first designed without ramps.
Only one of the biggest technical headaches, the British always had when building the Harrier, was the VTOL, - transferring from "lift" (downward nozzles), to forward flight (rear-facing nozzles), to then fly away from the lift-off. Apparently to achieve it took the British a hell of a lot of technical work, (three - four months at a time, over 3 years). Look up all the variants they made, but they never gave up, and they finally figured it out.
I made the claim long before we saw the F-35B, that it wouldn't be VTOL capable, (even with the Rolls-Royce lift engines), because, the US has tried to produce and build a VTOL combat aircraft many times before, only they've failed each time, only ever managing to produce and build the British Sea Harrier, able to do so. -- Every US airframe (and there have been many), have all failed.
I'll show you what I mean... Copy and paste “2013 MCAS Yuma Air Show - AV8B Harrier Demo” into CZcams search. At 7 mins, 50 seconds, you'll watch a Harrier performing a proper VTOL. You'll see it lift off vertically, and then fly away from the lift-off, and you'll see the transfer of nozzles take place. Yet, you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a full VTOL.
Yet Lockheed Martin do claim it is VTOL capable, when it, so clearly, is not. Copy and Paste “First F-35B Vertical Takeoff Test” into CZcams search. You'll see it lift off, only then you'll see it return straight back down from the lift-off. You'll never see it fly away from the lift-off, believe me, if it could, we'd have footage, everywhere, of it doing so - like we still see on all the footage of the Harrier, doing so. But you'll not find any footage, anywhere, of the F-35B performing a VTOL.
The Americans, when unable to answer this, will then comically claim, it's not necessary? Only while forgetting, they're to be carrier-based aircraft, meaning any slight damage to the deck or ramp, and they're unable to get any fighter jets airborne, defeating the entire purpose of having the aircraft in the first place! You can't ever lose an entire carrier in battle, for only minor damage?, I mean goodness me, whatever next?.
So, why do we see the USA doing this? It's obviously because, the US is still a country that's never managed to produce & build a VTOL fighter aircraft. Britain did so in the late 50s, Russia did so in the late 60s, the USA has tried and failed numerous times, so it seems this time, they're going to try to lie about it.
That country is a travesty! But it does show us, that Lockheed do indeed produce propaganda aircraft, as the F-22 is exactly the same, a failed aircraft, so today, only being used for propaganda purposes!
Russia has already lost a S500 system in Ukraine to a ATACM's
Fake news
@@maxbide1404 No, it's not fake news. Look that up.
dude thats Fake news ... its Ukraine Claiming it. there is no prove for it... also Ukraine claims they only lost 31k men while Russia 500k... what a joke...
In Australia the F-35 "Junk" could not fly to Melbourne because in Queensland had bad weather ! 😂😂😂
The F-22 , 32 of them are early model production jets, known as Block 20 jets, that were built as training aircraft, and are not actually combat-capable. Now dangerous to fly. 😜
I highly doubt,Russia would use an S-5OO missile to shoot down a cheapshit bayraktar drone.
If they want to test it, really provide it to Lebanon and Iran .
What about saturation attack with decoys? The system can only fire a limited number of missiles due to the number of missiles deployed.
"Occupied Crimea"
Bruh
F22 is the real king of the sky ?, so where is it?
Still in the hangers flawed with bugs😂😂😂
busy chasing balloons🤣
Should not be underestimated
2:25 Where did you see a raptor in real combat configuration?
Considering the F-117 was brought down by an SA-3 missile, something it was supposed to be "invisible" to. And let's not forget the Serbians sold some of the fuselage and RAM to Russia and China. Oh, that was in 1999.
Don't bore me down with dreams that won't materialise. Ukraine is not getting any F35s or F22s.
Because they're useless.
No one can hiden from S 500 strike
Some major layered array and interceptors standby maybe.
They have decoy and spoof capabilities.
The worst is retsliatiin being harsher and indiscriminate .
Prometheus alone itself
Isnt the F35 the one that flipped over and crashed on the runway while trying to take off or land? And isn't it the one that is billions of dollars over budget?
Dude please tell me you're not trying to say these two weapon systems are going to be flown in Ukraine?
S-500 already destroyed by Himars
f-22 may stood a chance, and pilot could eject but f-35 will just disappear from sky, if it even manages to fly. People should know that f-35 is biggest joke ever, 100 mil. $$ per plane, and only 35% of entire USA f-35 fleet is operational, that makes, what... 5 planes 🤣🤣🤣
Once the F-16's arrive in Ukraine the S-500 will get real time/ real world experience, the Russians are waiting to test it on the new trained pilot.
Why doubt what they have not seen in action? Testing it will demonstrate its usefulness or otherwise.
just hope they dont put s550 on service.. that missile is anti space weapon ..
S-300/S-400 it's okay but S-500/S-550 & S-600 then we talk a different story
Yup no one can beat the F35 hovercraft stealth fighter jet and submarine all rolled in one yeah the S 500 would definitely have a problem shooting down an F35 in submarine mode 😂
No, they can not be defeated
This overcomplicates a very easy question and answer? You only need to ask, just what do either the F-22 or the F-35 actually have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? Firstly, you need to understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does "not" defeat low-frequency (long wave radar). Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
Therefore, regardless of the aircraft's RCS? When they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
And yet, neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they "can't" detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask again, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? The answer is, they have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today.
Because, on the other hand, we find the SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
So, just think about that, and what it actually means? Neither the F-22 nor F-35 can detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, while the SU-57 can detect, track and target all enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? It's a no contest, both the F-22 and F-35 are obsolete in today's modern military world.
The F-22 is only a propaganda based aircraft, that nobody has ever seen do anything, and the F-35 is a blind slow boat, that can't climb, can't turn, can't see, and can't even run.
The SU-57, provides shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
F22 weakness is range, while in this age we can fit smartphone to missile, and using AI recognition image, using infra red as seeker once in optical camera range target will lock by image recognition, image can be using flir or ordinary camera combine, also can use sound recognition as smartphone now day have
Urus inatisha
Stealth weakness: it is the exhaust from their engines. Detect the specific molecular exhaust trail and you find the aircraft. How? One possibility: maybe use lasers to excite the particular molecules found in the exhaust. Then these molecules will emit their unique signatures and... Satellite sensors can probably do this now without using lasers. How do you know it is a stealth aircraft? You detect an exhaust trail but can't detect the aircraft using radar. Gee whiz. How 'bout that. What could it be? What can do that? Duhhh... If something exists: it can be detected.
I think we'd actually have to see a Russian rocket in operation cuz yeah like they don't like
S500 is good but S500s is the hammer .🔨 the god that watch over you .
Best in the world
As an expert, like everyone else on CZcams, I will say one thing... keep speculating because the truth behind the curtains you may even see it when it comes out of the curtains, but you won't know the truth until it becomes obsolete
You only know the truth if you actually understand the aircraft in question, and then, it's not, at all, a difficult subject. But it's something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American we read here.
We read so many Americans making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing
We shall see if the F-35 can take on a. S 400 or S 500. What happens if the AwacS plane controlling the F35 or F22's get taken out. How about Satellites?
Maybe a thunderstorm?
But can it shoot down atacms ?
S-400s are shooting down ATACMS. Like they did the other week in Crimea when only one out of 5 or 6 missiles even got close enough to target to kill civilians on the beach after being hit. The S-500s weren't moved into Crimea until after this attack. So what do you think?
Very easily, it can also shoot down all US ICBMs. And we know this, because we've seen Russia do it, and they did so really easily too.
Maybe, you just don't know that Russia does have the capabilities to shoot down all US ICBM's. While we also know the USA has no defence against even the much older Soviet ICBM's, let alone Russia's modern lethal ICBM's, like, (Sarmat).
Sarmat is a manoeuvrable long range ICBM that doesn't need to follow a ballistic path, carrying up to 24 MERVS, over speeds of Mach 20.7; 4.3 miles per second; 15,480 miles per hour.
Also, because we saw the USA, under Trump, really foolishly, pull out of the nuclear arms treaty, (that prohibited the creation of any short-mid range nuclear weapons), now sees even the old defensive threat of "MAD", as an obsolete defensive threat today. So, honestly, how insane was that, really?
Because, Russia has created those short-mid range missiles, and they've done so creating, hypersonic mid-range missiles, able to carry nuclear tipped warheads, or full nuclear warheads, travelling at speeds we've not seen before.
Today's (reality), really is very clear, right at this time, as we speak, the USA is just incredibly lucky that Russian nuclear policy doesn't threaten pre-emptive strikes, but is only a defensive nuclear policy.
For example, If the USA had done any of what they are today, (stepping over every red line), in the times of the USSR, a nuclear war would have already taken place.
But, now that Russia has unveiled what the USA is trying to do, and after hearing the USA, (bizarrely, basically admitting what they're trying to do), will see Russia, soon, change their defensive nuclear posture, to a pre-emptive nuclear posture, and honestly, who could blame them for doing exactly that? (And we've just heard Putin say much the same).
Because, as Russia is very aware, (reality), always trumps everything else, and today's reality, is, they'd be able to strike and hit all US defensive stations and their platforms, along with all US nuclear silos, destroying them all within minutes, long before the US could even begin to think about any sort of retaliatory launch.
And even more reality, today, is, that any launch from the USA, would be pretty much meaningless. As Russia has the S-500 (anti-ballistic missile defence systems), and the S-550, that's able to operate alongside Russia's new A-235 anti-ballistic missile system, with the ability to shoot down hypersonic attack weapons, hypersonic orbital platforms, ballistic missiles, and their combat units, as well as satellites in near space.
And again, we know this is not just "Russian propaganda", (it never is), as we've all seen and watched Russia do exactly this, and they did so, so damn easily too. ICBM's of the USA, can be detected, tracked and shot down quite easily by Russia today.
Any Nuclear effort from the USA, today, would see them lose, and they'd lose big time! Massively, in fact, annihilation, is the only apt word.
It is clear to us, that we have to defend our interests, and to do so consistently, not boorishly or rudely, in both the sphere of the economy and of defence. The pressure will only end when the USA will be “persuaded” that the methods they are using are ineffective, counterproductive, and harmful to all ~ Vladimir Putin, 2014.
It never fails to amaze me the way our partners the US, (as we say in Russia) Stand on the same rake twice.~ Vladimir Putin, 2016.
The United States must “Rise above their endless desire to dominate” ~ Vladimir Putin, 2018.
For the first time in all the history of nuclear weaponry, (including the Soviet period), we aren’t playing catch-up with anyone. Other states have yet to create the weapons that Russia already has, ~ Vladimir Putin, 2020.
Talk about NOT taking the hint?
Oh, well, suicide is painless, I guess.
What plays against the S-500 is that even if they take down a few f22/35 the planes will find out what is their range limits and will play around it, and use stand off munitions
they have the advantage of being able to select which engagement to take, much like it is happening with Ukraine Air Defence and the FABs
Stand off munitions? S500 detects aerial objects at a distance of 600km and engages them at 500 km. How will that help US stealth jets going around it?( S500)
russia had ONE operational S-500, it is now destroyed. Several are being built but they will meet the same fate, destroyed by 20 plus year old missiles.
lol, Ukraine will never get an f35 let a lone an f22. Bet.
Stealth doesn't mean invisible just makes harder to identify by radar system . F-22 is best aircraft no question but built for air superiority not a fighter jet. Other hand F-35 is true fighter jet or just trash bin.
Russia and China has been preparing a decade on how to down this planes as its the biggest threat. I say if they can hit a regular HIMARS missiles that has small radar signature and low altitude travel , they can hit F-22 and F35 50-90% they just need better detection and lock systems.
f-22 raptor and f-35 lightning ii are going to fall out of the sky's like fly'$
NOT AGILITY AS LIKE RUSSIA JET
RUSSIA JET ARE THE BEST
S500 or as we in the west like to call it the shit 500
if not wrong didn't US stealth bombers get shot down in yugoslavia with old soviet missiles from the 60ies.
S500 is destroyed.
This is something we see completely misunderstood by nearly every American. We read so many Americans making such wild and ridiculous claims, like the F-22, is so much better than the Russian SU-57, (rubbish), that relies on washing machine chip technology, and has the RCS (radar cross-section) of a Jumbo Jet? Seriously, just what on earth, is that all about?
The first thing is obvious, they've no idea what the RCS of any military aircraft is, as they're always kept classified! So why make such ridiculous claims? But even more stupidly, they never even ask any of the most obvious questions, (as they all, always, just assume so much).
But, questions like, what do either the F-22, or F-35's actually have available to them, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft, from BVR (beyond visual range)? You'll find they don't know, yet, if they had just asked that one, really obvious question, then maybe they'd start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think!
Seemingly, they also don't understand, that stealth alone, defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar).
Therefore, to detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes.
So, regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and they stand out like a beacon in the night.
They never even question, or more than likely, they just don't know, that neither the F-22 nor the F-35 have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect any enemy stealth aircraft from BVR). So, just think about that, and what it actually means?
This is also a fact, the US air force will be fully aware of, only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there were no other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat!
So, obviously, we must then ask what no American ever asks, just what do the F-22, or the F-35, actually have available to them, to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR?
They have, AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35 in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding any potential adversaries, real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact.
As, on the other hand, we find this Russian SU-57, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today.
Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR.
This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types.
They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), (that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system).
Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57, and is also being used in the SU-75 Checkmate.
We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35.
As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR.
Seeing the all-important, Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky).
The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar, design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including...
Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters.
High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas.
High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges.
High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection].
The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band, AESA 5th generation radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars.
Furthermore, just what have the Americans, ever seen the F-22 actually, do, in the 20 years they've had it? Well, other than flying over a beach, on a CZcams video? Absolutely nothing.
US is extremely unlikely to deploy F-22 to anywhere near Russia. NATO countries that border Russia, Belarus and Ukraine will operate F-35s, so it might be that S-500 will eventually try to intercept those aircraft. F-35 has greater radar cross-section than F-22, but it's still quite stealthy. If S-500 radars operate in S and C-bands, I'm unconvinced that the wavelengths are long enough to track F-35. Going to low frequency end of the UHF band would improve the odds. But who knows. Of course, when F-35s turn on their combat radars, they are susceptible to passive detection.
The S-500 has also anL-band and X-band radar, that seems to be not mentioned in this video.