$269,000 POKER CHEATING SCANDAL - bigbluffzinc Reacts!
Vložit
- čas přidán 3. 10. 2022
- The poker cheating scandal that has hijacked our news feeds and divided the poker world. Head coach Jordan 'bigbuffzinc' Drummond watches back the action for the first time and gives his verdict on whether or not Robbi cheated vs Garrett!
Turn on the ‘🔔 ‘ to be notified of our latest uploads or click below to learn more!⬇
BBZ Poker is one of online poker’s most trusted training and highly-regarded resources. Led by Head Coach Jordan “bigbluffzinc” Drummond, BBZPoker coaches some of the best players in the world to compete in today's game.
If like thousands of others you’re ready to take your game to the next level, the best place to start is with our Bundles. Developed by tournament professionals Jon “apestyles” Van Fleet & Jordan “bigbluffzinc” Drummond, both the apestyles and BBZ Bundles teach you everything about tournament poker. For $99, you simply won’t find better value. Head over to www.bbzpoker.com and start crushing!
Our friendly, helpful, and dedicated community is where anyone can ask questions, learn strategy, and get involved with poker! Join our free public Discord today: / discord
Check out our socials:
● Twitter ➡︎ / bbzpoker
● Facebook ➡︎ / bbzpoker
● Instagram ➡︎ / bbzpoker
● TikTok ➡︎ / bbzpoker
#BBZPoker #OnlinePoker #PokerCoaching - Hry
Let's solve this amicably in the comments. Did she cheat in your opinion?
Yes she has played poker for years, she understands the game.
hustle would investigate the case not any random opinion.
After you pointing out that she has the club and heart blockers in her dumb mind, I'm now leaning more towards not cheating just terrible thought process and call. Nothing she said afterwards made any sense but she is a woman after all lol
Yes something between her and her sugar daddy is way off , this isn't a "I'm playing the man" nonsense she's on about
@@JohnJones-yk5qk Who's the daddy?
"the turn raise is batshit insane" by far the best technical analysis of this hand LOL
She’s so nervous after she calls because she’s trying to figure out how she’s going to explain this
No she see's his face and thinks she actually might die.. lol
@@miamiwax5504 lmao ☠️☠️☠️
How is this the most liked comment? Oh, I’m speaking truth!
Or maybe she's nervous because she called with a shit hand.
Speach during hand, Robbi- I gotta scratch my face cos I have shit, She didnt scratch her face because a fly landed on it or it was itchy, Anouncing to table I gotta scratch my face and having shit are linked in robbi s mind.
The backer ( Rip) says - You gotta pick your spots,
Robbi to Garret - Do you want me to call ? Rip - I vote NO
Robbi call immediately . Strange but true.
Thank you for providing a GTO response so we can all finally merge our drama ranges
HaHaHa!!
@BBZ Poker Coaching do you consider collusion cheating? If so, go to the 2 hour mark of the stream where she plays a AQ vs AQ hand with her backer. (Jacob AKA Rip) Watch him closely, his wink on the turn , and the whistle on the river. How does no money go in the pot on this hand? There is way more going on in this session then just the Garrett hand.. I am a retired dealer and I saw so many things that are questionable. Check out the QQ vs J2o hand. Her hand does not show up on the reader and another player (Mike X) who is not in the hand, reaches over and spreads her cards. Two things here, 1. how does he know her cards are not being read? 2. If I am in a hand and another player touches my cards, that person is going to have a few broker fingers. So, in my opinion one can not conclude if she cheated by looking at one hand in a vacuum. As soon as I saw Rip leave the table and go out and call Garrett a "fucking pussy" I knew from my many years in a card that some how he was involved. Turns out he is her backer and she gave Garrett 65k of his money to Garrett. All is not as it appears in a card room!!!
Best analysis of the situation I've seen yet. I'd be curious what other types of call downs she has made this session or the last few sessions. That is useful information to see how likely she is to make "light" call downs.
She called a couple hands drawing dead.
She was debating calling J high another hand when Garrett had a boat.
This wasn't a light call down lol. This was all her money and she is being backed.
Good analysis 👏 but I’m just amazed you’ve never heard of Garret Adelstein. Probably the biggest name in the game at the moment.
Yeah I was shocked by this too 😆
I've heard his name mentioned but it doesn't mean much to me. I know his name better than hers (I'd never heard hers before) but I just know nothing about him/how he plays/etc. I study a lot of poker but I do it using tools and don't really watch poker on TV at all.
You can not confuse amateur poor play and nervous talking with cheating. This is common with amateur play I have won and lost with their unbelievable bad calls.
@@kylehilfiker917 she's not have you seen her play ?
Sir have you ever touched 100k+ on a poker table? if not stfu
This also isn’t common amateur play😂😂 No complete amateur buys in for $100,000 and plays 100,200,400(400).
@@seanaujila7014 just bc she’s playing high stakes doesn’t mean she isn’t a rec, which she clearly is
@@modestomouso1234 so why would Rip stake her vs Ivey, Garrett, Eric, and Andy?
21:00 "This dude doesnt know shit, this dude just stfu."
Idk why, but i just lost it there at that comment. Ahahaha so fuckibg true
Great instant observation. This guy deserves a 🏅 medal😂
Perfect analysis. She puts her foot in her mouth so many times, contradicting previous statements and not comprehending the board, which is why this is either cheating or the craziest amateur hour move I’ve ever seen.
I was waiting literally for you to react to this😅
You nailed it.
It's much simpler for a person to make a horrible play than it is to rig a cheating system on an online recorded poker stream.
She's not a total novice who has no idea what she's doing. She's won money in all three of the Hustler's streams she took parts in.
Some one asked her “ you have pocket 3s she says no ! They asked her “ do you have a 3 she says no “ and a 3 would not be a blocker ! She says she has blockers ! More then one .
i agree. there is no middle ground. and based on how shes played and showed a decent understanding of the game at certain points, i lean towards something is going on here.
She was playing pretty well previous streams I think it either blatant stupidity or cheating. She has someone who knows the run outs possibly her boyfriend whos at the table playing, I really don't think shes calls off 100k that fast on a hero call lol.
Just luck .I do it all the time, I've clean tables online doing it
@@scratchnoff7609 what site because I want to play you if you call huge bets with zero draw and Jack high.
The only argument in her favour is thats she's bad at poker
She called his allin on TURN. He hits on river, and it’s a non-issue. How is her making a donk call cheating?
Cool analysis man, I agree with you. The hand during live is extremely suspicious and Ludacris. Even if he doesn't have much, no made hand, it's so unlikely that J4 can even be ahead. Like you mentioned, any J, Q, K, A, not to mention pairs and made hands. He also bet almost pot, showing strength and then went all in, so not much of a weakness tell. You think with the vibrating chair footage, like okay maybe she was relayed information to let her know that he needed to still hit otherwise she wins. Then the clean runout and she chose twice also because that was in her favour also. She mentions blockers too much which doesn't make sense because she doesn't block anything except for what he has and she shouldn't have any clue about what he has if she remotely thinks J4 can call the all in(Range wise). Perhaps it was a gangrene play but check out some earlier hands, with the vibrating chair and another hand v Garrett. He had a Q4 fullhouse and she had J8, literally the worst hand available and she tanks and uses a time chip. The min raises are also bizarre to me, still can go either way and no real proof yet.
ギャレット→相手のハンド見えてる
ロビー→結果がわかっている。
Thanks for coming in and yeah the other part is when she has the best of it she has to fade hell for outs... And if she's wrong and has the worst of it she's probably drawing dead...
@@BBZPoker That's right, still so risky and only a good strategy when knowing the run out but that's heavy duty and extremely unlikely. As you said, more so a madness call and poker being poker just rewarded her.
even if Garret had a 10 or 9 she would loose. So she had to know that his strongest card is an 8. She looses against anything from 9 upwards. She knew he had an 8 or less or she doesn't know anything about poker then what is she doing there. 9,10,J,Q,K,A beat her. Even J as she had 4 with it
Okay first thoughts. I think her table talk after the hand, trying so hard to overcompensate and convince everyone that she makes these calls often. Which is interesting because from my POV “often” can be very indicative if we see what % of the “often” calls she wins in these type of hands. Looking at that first should be the first thing to do imo.
Ask every married man. "Has your wife ever done something illogical and she couldn't quite explain why?" I guarantee you that almost all of them will say yes.
What would the world think if she actually lost both runouts to Garrett? Would Garrett still have accused her? Would poker pros and community still question her? Or would they just look at her like a big donk who punted her money?
I think the poker world is a bit results oriented right now!
Yeah I tend to agree that if she lost both it probably would have been laughed off more easily/investigated less.
Then it would mean that she is dumb. So the analysis is still correct
I think it still would have been suspicious but she would have mucked her cards and Garrett wouldn't have known till he watched the feed later. Still would be questionable.
Well said 👏
She made it day 4 of WSOP main, and is 3-0 at Hustler casino against a pretty solid line up.
" you keep letting me do this to you ...I'm just testing it " Garret should have said what the new vibrator 😂
How can she call if she had nothing for 129,000.00. Not even a piece of the board. How can she make a call like that.
THANK YOU SIR!
I swear it annoys me how this mass of people who clearly don't play above family night poker are justifying her action 😬 its so annoying.
@MAE98 this call has nothing to do with GTO. Only 3 plausible scenarios. Either she misread her hand, she is plain stupid or she cheated
Hell yeah!
If she didn’t cheat…why would she walk out the poker room with $135k in chips? I truly believe that those are signs of guilt. She cheated that man 💯%…
What about all the lies afterwards and the "giving back the money"- part?
Garret aside, Andy in the back in a few different shots has the look of something is suss
Guys says call of the year instantly polarize her either cheating or the greatest call ever , jail or poker hall of Fame no in between 🤷
Coach -"statically speaking she's cheating ...um I mean .." I hear no lies coach 😂
While watching the stream I just assumed she made a dumb call got lucky and that was that. However at the time I was unaware that RIP who was also sitting at the table staked her. Giving Garret back the money is also a red flag as no one would do this unless they felt guilty in a way and just wanted the situation to disappear.
She's supposedly being staked by 3 different ppl. Rip being one of them. I don't think her play has anything to do with rip staking her. But I can see why he was upset with Garrett but she's a female and Garrett wins tons off this game and soon as he gets caught with hand in cookie jar now everyone is cheating, so imo, this why rip was upset. Because he saw one of his peers being bullied into paying money back that was won fair and square
She gave the money back because of the pressure of the moment, and the fact she literally doesn't care about the money she just wants to play poker on camera. Saying someone cheated because they did something stupid and got lucky is asinine.
Cheaters are to greedy to give money back, they'd probably double down and make sure they keep the money.
But everyone's different. I saw a player mis read his hand, thought he had a straight so called. Gave the money back, just out of empathy.
If I’m rich and knowing the face of pokerGarrett accusing me of cheating. I would also give the money back knowing everyone would believe Garrett and can ban me from ever playing high stakes again. For some there image is more important. I’m glad we now see the real Garrett and his poker bro Doug bitch boy Polk.
Yup
I have seen these kind of tilt calls 100s of times in our 500$ games. You 3 bet someone a couple times and they start calling you with any 2. However, someone said she won in all 3 streams, also she might be really rich, but for 130k, you wouldn't be making those tilt calls.
The fact she says if the jack wasn't a club like she had flush outs on the river when she doesn't and says I put you on ace high is suspect as hell, and if she misread her hand and thought she had Jack 3 then she must of thought it was a diamond as well as the 3 of hearts is out.....
When she raised the turn shouldn't he have folded?
No her raise was too small. His hand is either a call or a shove and both plays are probably reasonable.
yes he should have. these nerds don't know what they're talking about.
Even a beginner would fold that hand, and she wouldn’t be at that high stakes game if she sucked
Lol these high stakes games are built around players like her.
@@ghostyff9183 the private ones might be but not the televised ones
@@cke11y if u assume everyone you see playing on TV is good you're wild. It's 90% fish
@@ghostyff9183 are you saying 90% of that table are fish ?
Does it look like cheating? Yes. Does it any evident to prove it beside the hand? NO!
No player, who's made a stupid call but still won, would even consider returning the money
This dude's hilarious 😂😂😂
This dude deserves a medal 😂😂😂
😂😂😂🤣
“I did this to you off stream too.” Can someone explain how she’s clueless yet she says this?
cheating is super common i spoke with a retired dealer at the bike that said it was manditory to know how to set up hands......
Her story changed multiple times and she gave the money back. She knows not only what he has but also what will come. Her body language is as if she’s waiting for info to be communicated.
She hasn’t changed her story she was yell at it was ordered by the producer to go in a hallway with him face-to-face very easy to be intimidated. Not to mention if there was drama she didn’t want to cause that. You can clearly yelling in the back.
i agree with u 100%. the only thing i have to add to this hand is that if it were at 1/2 or 2/5, no one would give a shit and we all just move on to the next hand. cuz its nosebleeds stakes, now its the hand heard around the world. also why would a cheater give back over $125k off the table. makes no sense she was cheating. she just sux at poker (with an unlimited bankroll)
There is a hand where this purple hoodie guy owns Garret on the river with speech play its hilarious too :D sells him to reveal one card for 6k and talks him into hero calling with A high
The fact that she thought she had a bluff catching hand tells you she has no idea how to play the game. People accusing her of cheating give her way too much credit honestly. It's not even her money that she was playing with either, she was being staked by Rip who was also at the table.
Great analysis. Just such a crazy hand. For a little more context, the previous hand to this one, she saw a flop with J3 off. I think she was confused, and thought she had a pair of 3's personally. Garrett still had mad outs. Such a dumb spot to cheat. I think he's just salty missing all those outs! We've all been there😂
I am impressed. I subscribed based on your analysis. I feel 95% confident she cheated. My assessment thus far is base on additional CIRCUMSTANTIAL evidence, but it all points in that direction.
Yeah it's a hero call back in the 90s we called it a donk call if she plays online it's in her game...there no cheating it's called poler
Thanks for subscribing even though you had a different opinion/interpretation! I'm impressed too ;)
@@scratchnoff7609 seems like you’ve been proven wrong
As long as there is a possibility to cheat then people will find a way. Just knowing that card readers exist and is fed to a live stream, how could anyone say that cheating is impossible? It is not impossible, and actually appears to be fairly easy, with the right connections. I only know that this hand was the perfect hand that everyone should be able to clearly identify as cheating, if there ever was one, this would be it
None of her excuses make sense. She says she thinks he had ace high and still calls with Jack high? If you make the hero call knowing your read is correct, you never give the money back.
I think the pitfall here for people who want to believe that she cheated is over-analyzing her words and behavior during the entire hand. These poker geniuses are expending the grand total energy required to analyze the greatest unsolved mathetical problems when the issue really only requires the simplest explanation. we can all agree that unless proven otherwise with incontrovertible evidence (not conjecture and/or speculation), she's not a cheater but a donk who got lucky in her most stupid momen
EXACTLY trying to give a response as to why she did it makes no sense whatsoever and its what a guilty party (guilty of making a bone head move) does and she did it the thing that people dont understand is this IF IT CAN HAPPEN IT WILL HAPPEN
Cheating on a live stream to get a coin flip? Makes no sense. Running it twice? Makes no sense (unless she knows the runout of the deck which doesn't seem possible). She made a similar type of hero call against an Adelstein bluff representing a flush on another day that was legit, and everyone was super impressed. I think she was keen to replicate that and convinced herself the situation was similar.
What did she have? Jack high? I bet she had at least a pair in the hand you refer to.
@@teddyj5187 She did. It was a much easier call to justify I don't deny.
@@miltonthatherton1375 was that this stream or one earlier so I can see.
I agree that she's probably not cheating. I've played with many people live who make terrible plays like this. They all have 2 things in common: no understanding of poker, and money doesn't matter to them. Maybe Garrett just hasn't played with any truly terrible players for a long time, and doesn't realize they're out there?
Like this? Really? Full time poker player here, been grinding live for 7+ years. Only ONCE have I ever seen anything like this. Romanian geezer bet and calls off with K high on wet board. But was a paired, low board and he was clearly totally clueless and tilted.
Remember she's calling off a 5x 3bet shove with what any player would understand is nothing. If you see that in your games please let me know where your located and I'll see you next week!
@@Steezy93 crazy yes but most aren't stupid
people are overreacting imo. it's fucking poker. this is like getting mad in a game of tic-tac-toe
@@krazykorean2525 people forget poker is gambling and theres tons of fish, whales and generally dumb people making outrageous calls and winning because yes afterall there is a lot of luck involved.
@@lloydchristmas1086 agreed. i play poker and i still believe it's 90 percent luck due to cards. is there skill? minimal bare minimum i'd say. it's all luck mostly and people who say otherwise are full of shit imo.
She doesn't have a bluff catcher. Lol. She's not even beating most of his bluffs. She might be 50/50 vs his bluff range. She has a bluff-flipper LOL
She's not a great player she made a dumb play and it payed off. She should have never gave the money back. She was intimated and he's a crybaby..
What if she said hey you got 87c or 67 c before the river came out would people be going crazy???????
I got called with 10 high at 2/5 so shit happens at poker unexplained things have happen so me ive seen were people have no clue how to play just still manage win with 10 high lol
People keep saying she sucks but she is crushing the game. FISHY
Hey BBZ don't you think it's weird that during the run out and Garrett is soooo interested in finding out what she has because he doesn't actually know so his picking for information and even says that's all you on the first runout because he is making up hands for her as the first card flops. She doesn't do that. Even with the Ace in the second run she doesn't react as if damn I at least lost one or both. Her reaction is that of I won both hands I know it. Only possible way is she knew what he had and had no reason to worry...her composure and reaction are what don't make sense.
Those are good observations. It's an interesting hand but for me the statistics are really powerful here. I think it's just very unlikely someone is cheating (obviously not impossible) and you can stack up a lot of things that point to a higher probability of it but have the base rate so low that it's still just more likely she made a bad call.
@@BBZPoker I agree there's more reasons to think it's just a bad hand. The investigation from Hustler's casino is necessary to lay this to rest.
Great point.
If you really want to solve this hand, you can watch the whole stream. And see questionable plays when she has AK vs A8, Set of JJ, and JJ vs Reuske. And alot of people say that she called because she was bullied by Garret, but it wasnt true, there were no hands where he took her off her hand with big bets, its just playing victim. Alot of simps in there as well. And there was another steram, where she floats 2 streets with AK against Garrets K5, gets there on the river with an Ace, Garret shoves and she calls, he just says nice hand. Because he play was qustionable, but reasonable.
Yeah I think they bring people who are not real skilled at poker an like to throw around $ you know for the TV show. I believe she did catch him bluffing the other day but it wasn't this crazy. I'm not skilled at poker I just play for fun, I think you've brought the best insight I've heard an makes the most sense. She just isn't good at poker like me cause I might have called there but not with those amounts of $ but I probably folded after he bet post but I wasn't there?
1000% cheater said every psychiatrist ever, on demeanor alone
She has yet to make this call and lose. Small sample size, but still would expect to see this call off and lose 100 times before 1 where she calls off and is right. Also claims to have "done this off stream" which is both an admission to something not accused and admission that shes 2-0 on this type of call off.
She has played some mtts including winning 2k mtt, so cant be that clueless, but theory is that she played the hand as if she had j3 (she had j3 previous hand), which kinda makes sense. Still loads of weird stuff like changing story alot/giving back money/staring at hand and not noticing - sus af.
she has a year expirience and that win was another player with the same name
She thought she had a single 3 in her hand and was embarrassed to admit it. This is obvious. Phil said this also.
Man I liked this video 23 seconds in, and honestly should have done it sooner becouse you bring that statistical approach even when it comes to bullshit... loved it, and the presumption of innocence. Shes not quite sure what shes doing, but she will not be bluffed!!!
Awesome I'm glad you liked the video early and I didn't disappoint later!
i didnt know bbz was an anime fan, nice to know!
At 14:05 her ruby ring is facing up. She cracks all her fingers multiple times, then smacks the table and puts her hand under her leg. When she pulls her hand up, the ring is facing her palm 🤔
😂😂😂😂😂 You’re joking!
There was also a straddle.
The thing is she has constantly changed her story and clearly lied multiple times.
Previously I thought it was an obvious cheat. But now I just think it would be nearly impossible, it would have to be an oceans eleven type shit just to blow it in the most obvious possible way.
One relevant point is she did have J3 the hand before, but I think she was embarrassed that she misread her hand and then tried to play it like a soul read, which is just ridiculous.
The giving the money back part is weird but her husband is rich, supposedly..
it wouldnt be hard. someone taps into the live stream. give someone a cut. hey just send me a signal when its an all in moment and i have the best hand
@@brandonf4196 yeah I think that's the only way it would be possible to cheat
If only she would of turned over the jack at showdown, Garett would of just folded.
You don’t understand how she is using her J of clubs as a bluff catcher/blocker. She’s saying that she’s is blocking his exact outs of clubs and straight draws. She’s using this term as though she knows his exact hand. That’s why she’s blocking his hand.
So if she IS cheating, did she only cheat one ONE hand? If she was cheating, I would think she would cheat on more than just 1 hand
She won every session they played. If she is that bad of a player a guess she cheated every session.
My only question is. If she was cheating. Is the how? Someone would have had to help her out, but even then, her hands doesn't make sense because the equity of it.
this hand was 100/200/400/800 w a 400 ante so 4 blind game where she is 4th blind IP against 3rd blind
I agree 100% with him, he’s so good that he already pinned Eric as an asshole within minutes. This took the rest of the Poker world a month or so and a slightly larger sample than Eric beating the cry baby Helmuth. 😊
Side note…that shirt fits her beautifully.
May she not call???
Cant believe you didnt hear about Garret. Thats bs.
I think it was an airhead mistake. Sometimes chicks get lucky. I really don’t think she understood wtf was going on.
Your comment made me laugh :D
He's in bb not sb. She's in the 1600 straddle. She felt he was bullying her straddle. She doesn't understand the concepts she's been studying. Garrett said I usually run it once but it's up to you. She decides twice. So 2 cards to come and half the deck helps Garrett win. She just doesn't understand poker like pros do. So it's not crazy for her to think Garrett was just trying to push her around with 2 garbage cards
James U are so right
But she had two garbage cards. Some better spots to make a call like this.
@@teddyj5187 his cards were worse than hers.
@@jermainejefferson5338 he had like 20 outs his cards were way better when he shoved. Flush, open ended straight draw. She had nothing but a jack with 4 kicker.
@@teddyj5187 he still needed something to complete his hand. He had nothing. Point blank
All good in saying she MAY have cheated... but if she did... how is it possible???
I want to see proof that she cheated , for me she is innocent
She played the player no cheating involved she read his ass
She doesn't understand the lingo and concept of bluff catcher or blockers etc. She's trying to utilize the study she's been doing in these games but still hasn't grasped it all. So she's making bad plays while thinking she's making reasonable plays because she thinks she's using what she's been learning in these games.
Speach during hand, Robbi- I gotta scratch my face cos I have shit, She didnt scratch her face because a fly landed on it or it was itchy, Anouncing to table I gotta scratch my face and having shit are linked in robbi s mind.
The backer ( Rip) says - You gotta pick your spots,
Robbi to Garret - Do you want me to call ? Rip - I vote NO
Robbi call immediately . Strange but true.
Yo that little nerdcorner is fucking lit 🔥
Lol probably the most fun comment to read! :D
You have a poker blog and you don’t know who Garret is?
My thing is this, unless she is in the blind, she should have folded pre flop. Even though she has a better face card, he could have had pocket pair of A,K,Q,J or pocket 10 and hit 4 of a kind. I felt his pain
There’s another video where she gave Garrett the money back after he accused her off cheating
That's a mind game she's pulled on him, she even said she was reading him , she know she'll get it back ..why run it twice if your cheating?
@@scratchnoff7609 why would you give it back if you ain’t cheating and why would you change your story she clearly says she ain’t got a three and just bluff catching after she calls the all in then in an interview afterwards said she thought she had a pair of threes that’s why she called him.
It’s just as bad to accuse someone of cheating without proof as it is to cheat. Shame on anyone willing to condemn her without proof
14:01 right middle finger she turns the device around,,, proof
You have a good analysis, but the only problem is that she doesnt suck. Go review the entire stream and you will see that she not once calls and is wrong, and by the way she plays you get the sense that if cheating wasnt an option, I would begin to believe that she just might be the best female poker player out there. I just have a hard time buying the "I dont know what i am doing, therefore, Im going to call off my entire stack (that was staked to her) with no draw, and a jack high. The weirdest thing is that her reasoning for calling was because she had one of his outs, or blockers as she put it. How would she know that the j of clubs was one of his outs, and be so sure of it that you would call off over 100k! Its so crazy! I have never seen this before! Yes stu unger made a 10 high call once, but at least he gave a good explanation as to why he did it, and truthfully, who knows, maybe he was cheating too. I mean, it was vegas in the 80's-90's.
her reaction is the worst.
that is not a bluff cather face .
if i was playing i would have to have a 9 minimum and even then dont feel good about it
If we had past information on Robbi calling people down with J high 10 high etc I would lean towards her being a bad player. But because she hasn't had any previous moments similar to this situation I'm leaning more towards cheating.
I don’t think there’s any other explanation then she is cheating cause nobody puts in 100k with just the river to come with jack high she’s beating none of his bluffs and even against hands like he’s got he’s probably still marginal favourite but against any hands like ace high king queen queen jack etc she a massive underdog, don’t see how she can explain this play unless she has a history of playing ridiculously poorly against Garrett in past. It would be interesting to see other hands played between these two and see what hands she folds against him cause witnessing this play she shouldn’t fold any if she’s going all in with jack high with just river to come.
But wouldn't you think if she were cheating, she would pick a spot where she's better than flipping in equity to call all-in?
The Dr really cheated her out of cash when he did work on Robbi's face and lip's.....
People who know nothing about the game don’t play at this level and be bank rolled to do it.
How easy was the money to replace. If she had a ton of cash this makes sense.. she is playing with someones money, so maybe she didnt care if she lost it..
She actually is a winning player. 1k first stream, 100k 2nd stream and this one. If and big if she is cheating she is trying not to be too greedy but got caught up in the moment.
I am dumb and I know how to play poker but with J4 and 100k plus "all In" I will never call!!! ... maybe she's dumber than me...
Noway she cheated unless she or whoever gave her a signal knew what the last river card would be....(2 clubs in Garretts hole cards and 2 clubs on flop=4),Garrett had 9 outs of the 13 clubs left to hit a flush on the river..... 3 jacks 3 (6s) instead of 4 each because jc,6c(accounts for flush outs),,,, 3(8s) 3(7s)= 21 outs for Garrett... TOTAL cards used up to the turn is 8 players 2 cards each=(16 cards) 2 burn cards by the turn and 4 cards for the flop and turn = 22 cards used up to the turn, total deck 52 cards minus 22 = 30 cards left in the deck. Garret has 21 total outs.= 21/30 cards for Garrett to hit the river....not exactly great odds for her to cheat without knowing the river card.. i think Garret had almost 70 percent chance of hitting the river provided you take all the outs possibly still in play....basically if cards are all random and no one knows what cards are remaining in the deck and also used up (only reason i said "random cards remaining" is because pros have the odds at 53% vs 47% in favor for Garret to hit the river, they took the 22 cards used up by the turn and divided by 4 for (four suits) which equals 5.5(the average of the four suits likeliness of being evenly in the 22 cards that were used up until the turn.)........ So take the 21 Garrett outs at turn minus 5.5 is 15.5 and divide that by the 30 cards remaining in deck but minus the last burn card before the river draw 30-1= 29 cards now remaining for the river draw=15.5/29 = 53% for Garrett(pro calculated)... would you make that call on the turn? OR////////////// (aiming for Garret to miss his 21/29 outs?assuming all 21 outs can in reality still be in play)...........she is just a very bad player and got lucky this hand...