DCS VR PERFORMANCE TEST | I9 14900KF | RTX 4090 | 64GB RAM
Vložit
- čas přidán 6. 06. 2024
- In this video, we are conducting a quick performance and benchmark test in DCS virtual reality with my new system. With all the new hardware, it's easier to maintain maximum FPS, excellent clarity, and fantastic results. The time when VR will dominate this genre is coming soon!
VR Lenses (AD)
bit.ly/Laubox_vrwave
Pimax Headset:
20$ OFF code for users: lauboxvr20
pimax.com/?ref=Qzok8x
TWITCH ➡️ / laubox
DISCORD ➡️ / discord
TWITTER ➡️ / lauboxvr
Timestamps:
00:00 System Specs and Ingame settings
1:05 Quest 3 - Virtual Desktop - Godlike - 90HZ
2:40 Quest 3 - Meta Link Cable - 1.5x render scale - 120HZ
3:10 Quest 3 - Meta Link Cable - 1.3x render scale - 120HZ
4:01 Pimax Crystal - No Eye Tracking - 1x render scale - 90HZ
5:20 Pimax Crystal - Eye Tracking - 300% Foveate resolution - 90HZ
6:46 Pimax Crystal - Eye Tracking - 300% Foveate resolution - 120HZ
PC SPECS:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Intel® Core™ i9-14900KF
64 GB DDR5-6000
#vr #dcs #benchmark - Hry
Living the dream! 👍🏻
The struggle to hit 90fps in sims is hopefully a thing of the past with the next hardware generation.
It will soon surely be a thing of the past! We are still in the early days of VR!
120hz in DCS🤩. What a time we live in.
And in VR. Really amazing.
Thank you for including Enigma and Syria - that's some real stress test there.
Wow, that’s crazy, the Pimax crystal is amazing.😮😮
I watched this video.. an said enough.. So got a 14700k 64gb ram 4070s 2tb ssd.. an love this game... inspiration goes a long way
Running mine with similar setup but a 7800X3D and my old 3080. Waiting for the 5080, hopefully it will be superior when compared to the 4090. Thanks for the great (and rare) DCS VR benchmark! Not a lot out there!
I'm running DCS with Pimax 8kx, 4090, 13600k and 64Go DDR5. Almost same settings as you. I have better results in FPS and quality by increasing pixel density to 1.2 than increasing render quality in PiTool. This gives me almost perfect 75 FPS in Persian Gulf with the mirage near buildings.
Thanks for the video. You convinced me to upgrade my CPU 😆
Thanks for the Video, enjoy your new rig!
The problem is not the FPS though, with DLSS it's nearly impossible to spot or identify enemy aircraft in time. With MSAA in VR , everything is shimmering, it is disgusting to look at it, especially to the object in mid range.
I use DLAA which is something in the middle, still problematic to see ground targets etc. I'm just wondering if it is related to Quest3 and if it is better in Pimax?
I have 58003xd with 4080s.
many thanks for the video, I've found it really helpful..I've noticed the ram usage it's always under 24GB almost every time with exeption of the NO EYE TRACKING scenario where (with the F16) you reach about 31Gb usage.. I actuaully have 32gb DDR5 6000Hz corsair, would U consider useless an upgrade to 64 for me considering that I'm thinking bout getting a Crystal in the near future?? PS my system is I7 13700KF + 4090
THANKS! :)
Too poor to buy the FPSMonitor License :)
Thank you for this informative video. Your PC spec is one I've been interested in. I'll probably wait for the 5xxx GPU to hit the market.
Currently I'm using an older system, starring the 3080Ti, and a 10850k. Also, the HP Reverb G2. This setup benefitted from setting the WMR to 60Hz. And OpenXr toolkit. And the necessary adjustments to maintain a smooth 30 fps low over London, and Paris. The operative word is "smooth". Any fps lower than that introduces stutters. OP, at what fps do you see stutters on your system?
Thanks for your comment! It's hard to say to what extent I notice stutters. Even when playing at 120Hz, a drop to 110Hz can cause stuttering. The best approach is to always match the refresh rate. Eye tracking, however, is revolutionary-even with my older 3080 Ti and i9 9900k, it provided a significant performance boost. Eye tracking is the future of VR performance, although I believe a 5090 could run DCS without it. However, in that case, aiming for 120 FPS with maximum frames would still benefit from eye tracking. If your current performance is acceptable, I think it would be wise to wait and save for the 5xxx series.
@@laubox I've tried foveated rendering, which DCS supports, but the pixelation at the edges of my viewing are distracting. Maybe that's due to the Reverb's rather narrow sweet spot. I'm not sure.
Same PC specs but I’m using an OG HTC VIVE. Is there anything I can do to make it look decent? I think I’m limited by my headset. Looking at Quest 3 and Pimax Light
You should have included all the other Virtual Desktop settings as besides just using the Godlike setting as these other settings have a significant impact on the performance too. The issue I had with Quest 3 using virtual desktop is it adds three or more seconds of latency in multiplayer which is not good. When using the Meta link cable, you cannot use external battery packs which limits your game play to about an hour.
Do you get that performance in the Apache module?
how fast does the eye tracking work on the crystal?
Have you had the chance to try out a 7900 XTX? What do you think? Could it be more powerful than a 4080 Super in VR with 24GB of VRAM?
Foveate resolution of 300%.. what does that mean compared to max headset resolution? I don't understand how it can go above 100% (Sorry new to this) Peripheral resolution 5% also?
How do you see the fps and gpu and cpu stats in fly with vr?
On quest 3 the quality do you think is better VD on godmode or linked?!?And did you try helos on others maps?!?I have a 4090 and a 13700k but i use 80hz only, 90 only on some scenarios...
Pfew. Hard to say. I would say linked on 1.5 render scale has better quality. Depends a bit in the bitrate in VD aswell. But i would always prefer cable over wireless.
Man I wish you had shown vram usage in your monitoring tool
Question, are you seeing the FPSmonitor overlay in VR (OpenXR) or is it just being displayed via the monitor mirror?
This would be great if it works in VR, kind of like FPSvr for OpenXR.
Good question. It is only being displayed via the monitor mirror. I have the openxr toolkit fps counter open in my vr view.
@@laubox I tried it, nope, only displays on the monitor VR mirror making it useless for myself. I like monitoring CPU and GPU Temps and stats, this is why I love FPSVR for SteamVR, wish he'd make a version of FPSVR for OpenXR if it's even possible. The OpenXR Toolkit Overlay is better than nothing but it lacks a lot of info I would like to see.
I changed to these settings and for some reason it seams locked at 60fps. I have the same pc components. Those settings weren’t too different than what I had so I’m baffled.
in your experience, is eye tracking with dynamic foveated resolution must-have? reason I'm asking, pimax crystal light that's coming out doesn't have eye tracking, hence it only can support static foveated resolution (in the middle of view), meaning you have to turn your neck to look at something clearly
I mean, eye tracking is very nice to have, but the peripheral areas are still going to be at a resolution comparable to first generation VR, so it's not like they're useless (Actually, due to the way DCS renders distant objects, spotting is easier in the low resolution areas). You just won't be able to easily read the instruments when they're not in the focus area. And we naturally turn our heads toward what we're looking at anyway.
The biggest shortcoming will be when you're looking over your shoulder toward your 6. This is actually troublesome with proper eye tracking too, since this is where you'll find that you're also turning your eyes and want more field of view in general.
DCS does tend to have some artifacting around the border of the foveated region due to how certain screen space shaders are implemented. This happens with the glare effect from the sun and moon, and with screen space shadows in particular. Basically, the shading doesn't quite match, so you see a faint "outline" of the foveated region under some conditions. I have no idea whether this is more distracting in fixed foveated mode, or in eye tracking mode, where the foveated region moves around with your eyes. In either case, it's not really that disruptive, and if they ever implement a bit of a cross fade, it'll be almost completely invisible.
Incidentally, it looks like the eye-tracking capture in the video only captured the peripheral region, so it's a representation of what the low resolution area outside of the center of view would look like. Slightly blurry, but not horrible, and the area your head is pointing toward will be much sharper.
@@Keldor314 thank you for the detailed answer
Great question bilbo and fantastic answer Keldor! Much appreciated!❤
Crazy. I get 50fps if I’m lucky on my G2. 13900k, 3090 and 64gb DDR5.
And that’s low to mid settings!
There could be so many factors. Do you play via steam vr? Render resolution? But yeah, eye tracking does wonders with the pimax tho!
With the G2 i'm using quadviews & it helps. Same cpu but with a 4090 & 64gb ddr5 ram. But definately not all high settings.
Try to do the same with the Apache over Mariana….
I thought virtual desktop was required for dcs to run on q3
If you look at the sea, the framerate is constantly at top limit.
If you look at the carrier and a fucking ton of moving objects... it drops... Well, that's an interesting fact. Didn't expect that.
Don't test on Caucasus with a low fid plane.
Test on South Atlantic north of Ushuala... If you have solid frames there, you have them everywhere.
Or you adapt your settings on every map before you start...
Struggling for 60 fps on a 2070S and I7 9th gen on medium-low settings
It doesn't mayter if you hit 300 fps if it stutters one bit
Why using flat shadows blur while you don’t use flat shadows at all 😂
Nvidia settings?
I haven't changed anything in the Nvidea control panel. All default - fresh Windows 11 install.
@@laubox Did you overclock your cpu or gpu any? Curious because I just ordered a pc just like yours a few days ago because my 9900k finally kicked the bucket. I had it overclocked but would like to not overclock the new cpu if I don't have to
90 fps with SSW I think ?
Nope. Ssw is not enabled
Computer marginally cheaper than buying a real FA-18
Fa-18 not sure possibly a mig 15 😊
How is the fps in a high populated server then in the f14 tomcat then,
I have the idea this has been recorded in single player, and not on a populated server with 40+ playere, wish to see a video of that as well.
Otherwise this is misinformation you send us, just saying.
Growling sidewinder server in peak hours 90 fps
5:13 yeah that would be great. Especially since you had to explain your wife why the Africa trip had to be cancelled in favor of you being able to have some me time in a virtual world nobody else at home is invited to participate in 😀
C'est vraiment presque aussi net que sur un écran ordinateur ou ce n'est encore pas cela et loin de cela même, J'attends le jour où un casque de VR sera aussi net qu'un écran PC