RANSAC - 5 Minutes with Cyrill

RANSAC - Random Sample Consensus explained in 5 minutes
Series: 5 Minutes with Cyrill
Cyrill Stachniss, 2020
Credits:
Video by Cyrill Stachniss
Thanks for Olga Vysotska and Igor Bogoslavskyi for their valuable feedback on the different iteration if the video.
Intro music by The Brothers Records

[@salmanali2719]

These 5 minute explanations are really a gem.

[@yuxiangguo3342]

The most understandable explanation on RANSAC.

[@shaochan9294]

I really enjoy this series! :) Thanks a lot.

[@GZhu-ph7jv]

very good intuitive explanation on RANSAC, thank you, Dr. Stachniss...

[@abdelrahmanwaelhelaly1871]

You literally carried my graducation project to safety with your slam videos
and now i am watching this for my job!
thank you so much

[@tobiaskupek9171]

Thank you for your video series on visual geometry. It really helped me alot for my exam preparation.
The 5min videos are perfect to get an overview, but also the lectures are very well done!

[@LearnRoboticsAndAI]

Couldn't be explained better and more efficiently. Thanks.

[@sarahjamal86]

Thanks prof for the fantastic videos.

[@kvnptl4400]

Nicely briefing all the concepts under 5 minutes! I suggest everyone check out the full playlist of 11 videos.

[@testme2026]

great insight, thank you, Professor Stachniss

[@monasalem963]

To the point. Thank you!

[@astro7060]

This is gem of a video.

[@davidvlk8625]

Pure Gold in thoses videos, thanks a lot

[@CyrillStachniss]

Thanks

[@hellper123]

thank you.
it would be great if you could add links to articles or other materials in the description of the video for a detailed reading of the topics of your five-minute videos.

[@nicolasperez4292]

i love the enthusiasm. quite an engaging presentation.

[@shaygalperin1027]

Great, thanks!

[@erfanroghani]

Thank you, professor.

[@russellwu2489]

Thanks, great explanation for ransac

[@firattamur1682]

Simple and clear thank you!

[@gurushanthmurthy3921]

explaination is really cool within 5mins... keep them coming :)

[@nazaninsafavian1026]

many thanks. really useful.

[@user-td9hv2yy2j]

This video is very perspicuous.

[@PoornimaEG25]

thank you so much very well explained

[@vinothbose]

Very nice way of explaining the things

[@junjiesong5708]

thank you for your explanation, it is very friendly for beginners.

[@anusebastian7283]

The class was very good . I really learn lots abt ransac

[@dmytrofilatov42]

Thank you Cyrill

[@gupta942]

awesome explanation 👌🏻

[@carlesuretaboza3872]

you made my exam revision thanks

[@user-bz2zj5cn2e]

really helpful

[@muze3k]

damn that shirt is well pressed..

[@anusebastian7283]

Can you share the Python code about ransac

[@tazanteflight8670]

Using random sampling of the 2 initial test points seems naive. Is that really the method used? How many times do you do this random test? The random sampling could be choosing all the wrong points, for a very long time...

[@CyrillStachniss]

The corresponding lecture video explains all that…

[@tazanteflight8670]

@@CyrillStachniss My comments are directed at Ransac, not you. But "playing the odds" doesnt make ransac correct. My sample size is small enough that I just test every possible connection. My results are based on the correct selection. Ransac's results are based on the wrong selection. I was just surprised at its implementation, thats all.

[@pie3566]

60% cannot be outliers, because then the 40% are the outliers: czcams.com/video/9D5rrtCC_E0/video.html