SDG&E proposes adding flat fee to utility bills

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 04. 2023
  • California regulators could completely upend the way utility bills are calculated in the state. Recently passed legislation (AB 205) requires the California Public Utilities Commission to put together an income-based fee for the state’s utility customers. KPBS Environment Reporter Erik Anderson says San Diego Gas and Electric submitted their plan on Friday.

Komentáře • 25

  • @reid1boys
    @reid1boys Před rokem +16

    this move is 100% a way to come after solar owners that recently failed. They wanted to do a tax for solar customers based upon the size of the system you owned, but that failed. So, instead lets just apply the same tax to those in upper income brackets instead.... which is also those same solar owners. This is absolute garbage. Imagine if the price you paid to get into a movie, the price you paid in a restaurant, the price you paid for a car, and imagine the price you paid for shrimp at the grocery store all was determined by your income level. If you are over 180k a year, you pay double what someone making 50k a year makes. We truly are headed to wards a socialist society. This is unbelievable.

  • @tpolerex7282
    @tpolerex7282 Před rokem +6

    The Vice President of SDG&E almost accidentally said it would lower overall electricity costs for everyone but caught himself, knowing that this is just another cash grab for charging the most onerous rates for any utility company in the nation.

  • @LanSensei
    @LanSensei Před rokem +8

    Insane! San Diego, CA already has the highest electricity rates in the country and the highest electricity rates in the world!

    • @LanSensei
      @LanSensei Před rokem

      Just Google "Average energy prices for the United States, regions, census divisions, and selected metropolitan areas" for a report from U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

    • @LanSensei
      @LanSensei Před rokem

      And then Google "Pricing of Electricity by Country (Updated April 2023)" for a report about Electricity Prices Worldwide and San Diego is #1

  • @donniethesportsguy893
    @donniethesportsguy893 Před rokem +8

    Invasion of privacy to find out how much I make. I ain’t giving you shit 😂

  • @binski5986
    @binski5986 Před rokem +6

    This is a bad idea. My bill is like $50. A month in the summer. Gonna get reamed again!

  • @frankn9725
    @frankn9725 Před rokem +5

    The economist is right, this is just hyperbole. Why doesn't SDGE do this trial with a smaller subset of lower income earners to see if their theory is correct or not?

  • @spiritwarrior6350
    @spiritwarrior6350 Před 7 měsíci +1

    We have to decide HOW much food we can buy according to our SDG&E bill ! 😢

  • @OJSRT24565
    @OJSRT24565 Před rokem +9

    They want that solar tax soooo bad. Kiss my but SDG&E

  • @Thebluebimmer
    @Thebluebimmer Před rokem +7

    How is this cheaper?

    • @rbrtck
      @rbrtck Před rokem +2

      It isn't, unless you use *a lot* of electricity instead of conserving.

    • @Thebluebimmer
      @Thebluebimmer Před rokem +1

      @@rbrtck try to do that with 1 or 2 EVs

    • @reid1boys
      @reid1boys Před 11 měsíci +2

      @@rbrtck it is not... if you are low income, you make out like a bandit. If you are middle income, you will probably break about even... if you are upper middle class, you are getting screwed.....if you own solar, you are getting bent over with no lube. This is all about going after solar owners . They wanted to tax us... they couldnt get it done. In San Diego do renters own solar? No, home owners do. Do you think the vast majority of home owners in San Diego are over that 180k income???? Hell yes. I currently pay $30 per month flat fee to be connected to the grid.... thats it. I pay zero the rest of the year due to my solar panels. If I get a 140 dollar a month fee added...... just to subsidize the poor? My local legislator better know now he will be gone as he voted for this.

    • @rbrtck
      @rbrtck Před 11 měsíci

      @@reid1boys Absolutely. This was going to be part of NEM 3.0, except it was removed before the CPUC (who are not our friends, either, of course) approved it. So the utilities got their dirty politicians to do their dirty work against solar owners for them, and force it down everyone's throat with a law. The question now is whether the ridiculous flat fees being proposed will stand as they are or be substantially reduced. The utilities' own argument that many other types of utilities such as water commonly charge flat fees actually suggests that the flat fees should be much lower. It all depends on how much of a transfer of wealth (i.e. government theft) "equity" 🙄 demands, according to the CPUC.

  • @AKAAAK
    @AKAAAK Před rokem +3

    And at the same time, running the big income earners out of the state. The CA more you make, the more they take business.
    Don't forget the electric car mandates in the near future 😅. Everybody digging DEEP into your pockets/purses.

  • @MyWasteOfTime
    @MyWasteOfTime Před 10 měsíci +2

    So glad I don't live in Ca!

  • @claytonjames4779
    @claytonjames4779 Před 11 měsíci

    This will case more people to move to. Power wall setup with solar

  • @elenar6212
    @elenar6212 Před 2 měsíci

    This is crazy. I bought the battery operated lanterns for nothing.

  • @batman-dd3wb
    @batman-dd3wb Před 7 měsíci

    communism