I just got one, man I love it. Such a better quality compared to my older 08 v6 and of course the 4.6 power and sound is amazing, such a fast and fun car to have. ❤
Nice I'm planning on getting a coyote of some sort. Preferably a 3rd gen 2018 with the 460hp. I've seen a 2018 as low as 28k. Currently have a 2004 mach1 4.6 4valve as a daily and pretty hesitant on selling it since they are very rare.
I know 2 people who bough 2010 GT's and were not too happy when Ford announced the 2011 GT was getting the 411HP 5.0 Coyote and 6 speed manual. Within 2 years both of them sold for 2012's lol.
I talked to a guy at a show right after the 5.0 was dropped he himself was also not too happy but he popped the hood to reveal a kenne bell and said "the wife wasnt happy but I had to get it" lol
There's usually a gap. 2010 Mustangs would be made 08/2009 until about 06 to 07/2010, then the line gets ready for 2011 cars. That's my guess, I don't work for the car companies...
same with my lt1 vs my friend's 3.8 Camaros but my lt1 gets better economy city or highway. I have stick he has auto so if his was stick it would be closer.
Love em ! But, I like the 05-09 body style better, I love my low miles torch red 06 GT, and I think the 4.6 3 valve tho weaker is still quick, fun to drive, & sounds better than the new 5.0 !!
Like my 2005 gt. It will always be the very first year of the old school looking stang. Will never ever sell it. 06 - to present nice just not the first. Kind of like your first love. Peace out, be blessed. Now go out and in joy your rides.
I probably would have been pissed off, but I'm glad I was able to get into a slightly used 2010 GT for about $10k less than the guy who brought it new. I love the look and sound which is what i was after most.
@ADD8oi I do believe you're correct on that. The GT500 had a ''as tested'' 0-60 run of about 4.2 and would be much lower if not for it having a habit of spinning its tires from first all the way through third. And yes, the LRA is intended for drag, but the other fact is they're cheap, dependable, easy as hell to work on, and cheap and quick to replace and you'd have to do some major damage to actually break one as opposed to a IRS system.
@ADD8oi Very true. But have you ever watched how much actual contact patch they have from the factory? It rivals that of a Honda Civic...most GT500 owners suggest that before even driving off the showroom floor that you should get wider tires with thicker sidewalls. But yes, it's cheap, and you can put loads of power in a stock rear end and never have to worry about blowing it out, and if you somehow do, it's a quick change.
Yeah but the new 6 spped transmission is garabage!! I own a track pack 2010GT. My buddy has a 2012 GT. We still both have our cars. Mine is mint w 62k his has 85k and 3 transmissions later...ive never even had an issue with my car and its 13 years old now.
@toyoracing89 they are wide, but like my buddy's older gt500, an 08, the front tires are thicker than the rears, which is even more pronounced in the 2011 GT500 with its 20 inch rims, they are however great due to their practicality, you dont want to pay in the 4 digits if you snap your rear axle, the 8.8" is used universally in fords new and old line-up, thankfully the V6 has upgraded to it aswell as a locking diff, Domestic FTW lol
Thanks fo clearing that up for me lol and so have have I. I always said why the 300 hp or 315hp mark where is the 340+ hp mark and so many people drive them too
Now would they give the cheaper V6 model more power than the GT of the same model year? I have heard that the 2011-2012 GT will be getting more power to compete better with the new Camaro.
@FLLMTR I think 36,000 is a decent price for what you get. it's smooth enough ride to be a DD, and the gas mileage is amazing for the power, there's alot of interior features... such as the navigation with microsoft sync.. ac is easy to control... i'd rather have a top of the line 5.0 then a new BMW or Mercedes...
Actually, the ecoBoost 3.7 Litre V6 twin turbo that is currently in the Taurus SHO will be going to the '11 Mustang. Aside from the engine, that antenna in the rear really sours the look.
am probably gonna catch some flack for this but i always wonder how much better mustang would be if they only started putting in independant rear suspension yearsssss a go..
Ford's reason when the 2005 retro Mustang was released is that it was to reduce costs and weight. Otherwise you can't have a Mustang that is at $30,000 below. Well it makes sense, cause it is a lot more affordable than the Camaro or the Challenger at that time. But I agree that they should have put an IRS when the SN95 chassis retro Mustang came out, it is fine at handling the power at the 350 hp range, but when it comes to the Shelby GT500 at 540 hp it struggles to put down that power. But the good thing is the Mustang has a very balanced chassis, in which it is predictable when the rear wheels will start to break traction.
@toyoracing89 i used to have the 4.0 mustang which had the 7.5" LRA, snapped like a twig after TTs, but i agree, nope ford uses the 8.8" differential in its production vehicles now, well all except the explorer 4.0 and rangers, IRS is great handling but it becomes flimsy under massive stress, the likes of which trucks and drag cars see
Also for those of you who say how mad people who just bought a 2010 were because a year later they introduced the 5.0 I have a 4.6 mustang myself and I’m not complaining 300 horsepower is still a lot It may not be as fast as a 5 liter but it can probably beat my cousins 2003 V6 Mazda That’s good enough for me
good looks inside and out plus good performance, but it looks like it sits up pretty high, $28,000 base price for the GT :O plus for its size the 4.0 v6 is kinda lacking compared to other cars like the 250hp 3.5 v6 in the challenger or the 300hp v6 in the upcoming camaro, or even the 210hp 2.0t in the new G coupe if i was in the market for a sporty coupe i would consider the Hyundai Genesis coupe as another rival for the mustang
compettion is hot so they had to make the new one good. damn good. i mean the camaro is and always was king, so itll be the one to buy. but if u luv mustangs and i do, even though i bought an lt4 camaro this new mustang is the way to go. especially this amazing interior
@knytrydr73 Because all three cars follow the exact same princibles. V8, RWD, 2 door, and to be a two seater masked as a 4 seater family car (exactly like the old days). Granted, they've all obviously gone their seperate ways as to how to display those points. But they all basically have the same purpose.
I think the 2010 is really a good deal, sure it isn't the 5.0 but other than that it's essentially the same. So it's cheaper and will handle about the same, less money spent on the car more available for mods
@@TheOfficialCaseMade bro the difference with a 2010 4.6 and a 2011 5.0 in the quarter mile is only .5 of a second and .4 on their 0 to 60mph acceleration times. So yeah, considering their power difference, the 2010 gt is pretty close. It wasn't until the new body style in 2015 where a big difference is made.
@@toxichudsoup1644 first of all, a half second is HUGE when you're talking cars. Second, there have been PLENTY of bone stock 2011 5.0s into the 12s. The 3V isn't even close.
@@TheOfficialCaseMadeexactly, this isn’t even getting into the fact that a 3v will only push 500hp with a blower compared to 700+ for a blown coyote. Recently got a 2011 5.0 glad I waited and spent the extra cash for the coyote.
I agree. Ford kept refusing to upgrade to a 6 speed even though GM had been using them in the Camaro for years. Hell the 98 Camaro had a 6 speed! Not sure of their logic
@Ronnie51026 us joking right? the 2011 Mustang GT goes 0-60 in 4.4s, does the 1/4 mile in 12.6s, pulls a .97g on the skid pad....the 2010 SS camaro does 0-60 in 4.8s, 1/4 mile in 13s flat, and pulls a .92g on the skid pad, the camaro go killed, nothings changing in 2011, 2012 the only thing different is that the 556hp Z28 is coming out, with a projected 0-60 of 4.2s, still getting owned by the mustang, wtf the camaro didnt even touch the 2011GT LOL!
Not really sure but I in the reviews of the engines compared to the chevy engines they always said it was more efficient. It never said why but I'm just quoting Motor Trend and Car and Driver.
Ford is a great company for high value, reliable cars but I just wish they did more on the interior. They're always a full generation behind in interior design: while the 2010 mustang interior is a big improvement over the 05-09 model, compared to competitors like 370z and 200 camaro, the new interior is more like a good interior of a last gen car. It's not even a cost issue; somehow the higher management must be really conservative about these things or something. Exterior is great though.
@Ronnie51026 lol whats the difference? the mustang is actually a much better car around the track, but i race sfrom stoplights and ive been to milan raceway once and pulled a 12.66 on factory stock with a 6spd and 3.73 factory diff, no camaro can do that stock, the best i saw was a 2ss that did a 12.98, the camaro is 2tons, mustang weighs 3600lbs....thats a huge weight difference and the mustang makes the same power....derrrrrrrr
@toyoracing89 yeah the problem with the Shelbys are the massively low profile rear tires, for the power they make, im sorry but 25 thick tires are worthless if youre making anything over 350hp, and the cheapness is true, also the fact that the aftermarket community and choices are massive
Umm I think i've just became a Ford guy.... 5.0L Gt 412hp.... 390tq.... WOW! I used to go crazy over the SRT8s 6.1L 425hp and 425tq but..... 5.0 vs. 6.1... how does 5.0L make as much power as a 6.0L+ engine. I'm Very Impressed as now I do not have to buy a European V8 with smaller displacement that makes plenty hp.
I don’t like that they blacked out the horse logo on the GT And the same goes for people who do it themselves on their cars What good is that beautiful horse logo if you can’t see it It makes no sense to me
I wouldn`t go so far as to say the DOHC is more efficient then a pushrod OHV motor. They both have their own advantages and disadvantages. What efficiency are you talking about?
this new born pony will be another eye-catching for modern muscle hope the dynamic trio (Mustang, Challenger, Camero) will have a fight of the title; witch muscle is better?! but for now, Long Live Ponies!!
Ford destroyed the relationship with mazda before word of Ford needing money got out. My company gets discounts with all ford products and when I tried to get a mazda for has specifically on their site said that they no longer are with mazda. This was around august
Wow man I can't believe the mpg rating on the v8 and even on the good for nothing 4.0 v6....24 mpg hwy for the v6 and 22 mpg hwy for the v8 in the year 2010? Its not even a big v8 at only 4.6 liters...I know I know its a muscle car who cares about fuel economy...but what I wanted to point out is that my bad ass 1997 camaro Z28 with a 4speed auto and larger 5.7 LT1 V8 rated at 285 HP and 325 torque gets 15 city and 24 hwy....same as fords good for nothing v6....what a great improvement Ford did with the new powerful and economical v6 for 2011...cuz its pretty sad that my bad ass camaro z28 got better mpg compared to this 13 years newer mustang gt...my 97 Z28 is bad ass cuz it can still take on mustangs that are 13 years plus newer.....not to mention that even in 2010 the mustang still don't have a 6 speed stick??? Why????? Camaro Z28 had a 6speed stick standard when it first came out in 1993......and by the way I'm not a hater As a matter of fact im trying to buy a 2010 gt but maybe I have to wait a couple more years so I can get real cheap in cash like maybe 5grand? I paid $2500 for my camaro z28 at 129k miles.....not a bad deal...
+Jorge Lopez What you guys don't yet understand is that while all the Camaro's get similar or better fuel economy from a bigger motor than the Mustangs, they have to be revved at a much lower RPM to do so. The 0.5:1 overdrive ratio in the Camaros means you're basically idling down the highway. In real world MPGs, the Mustang will likely do better as no one short shifts a pony car.
@ADD8oi Lol, true that bud. But as I said before...you would really have to do something seriously stupid to snap an axle. Because Ford spent a lot of time debating which to go with, LRA, or IRS and LRA was the best alternative. If IRS was so great and dependable, why is it that not even the lightest duty of pick ups or SUV's use them? Because they can take a shit ton of punishment and still go for hundreds of thousands of miles. I thought it was a 9'' with 3.73's?
its like asking how can a 2.0 engine put out close to 400hp without the need to super charge it. It all depends on what you work with. You can have the biggest engine in the world and still only push out little numbers or the same with the smaller engines. Ford is known for its advanced engines over the GMs old style for push rod (idk if they still do that). It works but its less efficient. I never really liked the Mustang really cause it was so under powered. Next year will be different.
Why am I watching this 9 years later
Probably because MotorWeek and Mustangs are two of the greatest things on earth
11 years””
Why am I watching this 11 years later
@@connorivers9375 Because of CZcams algorithms.
Cause television sucks nowadays unless you like drug commercials
It’s so fun watching these old motor weeks
I just got one, man I love it. Such a better quality compared to my older 08 v6 and of course the 4.6 power and sound is amazing, such a fast and fun car to have. ❤
How has it held up? I've been considering a used 2010 GT if I can't find an affordable 2011 5.0L
Nice I'm planning on getting a coyote of some sort. Preferably a 3rd gen 2018 with the 460hp. I've seen a 2018 as low as 28k. Currently have a 2004 mach1 4.6 4valve as a daily and pretty hesitant on selling it since they are very rare.
@@GolfInHawaii69keep it. It will be worth a fortune
I know 2 people who bough 2010 GT's and were not too happy when Ford announced the 2011 GT was getting the 411HP 5.0 Coyote and 6 speed manual. Within 2 years both of them sold for 2012's lol.
Back in 2011, Ford was talking about putting the coyote 5.0 engine in the mustang back in like 2008, They should have waited. it wasn't a secret lol
I talked to a guy at a show right after the 5.0 was dropped he himself was also not too happy but he popped the hood to reveal a kenne bell and said "the wife wasnt happy but I had to get it" lol
There's usually a gap. 2010 Mustangs would be made 08/2009 until about 06 to 07/2010, then the line gets ready for 2011 cars. That's my guess, I don't work for the car companies...
@thekirbyfan98
If that's the case then everyone would automatically be one year older on January 1st. Same concept. Think sometimes...
@@rompn4x my 2011 charger was built on 7-18-2011
Love my 2010. Hopefully it'll be a collector piece for my boys.
Mike Haggar: Will it be a Final Fight???
@@fwh79FOXR6 Nice one!!!!
2010 V6, 210 hp, 16/24 mpg
2013 GT500, 662 hp, 15/24 mpg
same with my lt1 vs my friend's 3.8 Camaros but my lt1 gets better economy city or highway. I have stick he has auto so if his was stick it would be closer.
You left out initial price, maintenance and insurance rates.
@@HAL-dm1eh My point was that the old V6 was slow and thirsty.
@@lfsracer79 ok. well that it was I agree.
Also, I never expected a reply, much less one so quick. That was a 7 yr old comment, and even more impressive is your username is STILL the same. lol
Love em ! But, I like the 05-09 body style better, I love my low miles torch red 06 GT, and I think the 4.6 3 valve tho weaker is still quick, fun to drive, & sounds better than the new 5.0 !!
This video is 11 years old but feels like it was made 30 years ago
The 2010-2014 Mustangs are some of the best of the breed, along with the ‘67-‘68, and ‘71-‘73 models. Love the ‘83-‘93 Foxbody as well.
how pissed off are you guys who bought a new 2010?
Why because one year later the 5.0 came out🤷🤣
Life long observer! Gratitude for all the great work and memories
I just bought a black one about 3 weeks ago. I love it. It's my second Mustang. I used to have an 07 GT that was also black. It's my favorite car.
Lucky baster
Like my 2005 gt. It will always be the very first year of the old school looking stang. Will never ever sell it. 06 - to present nice just not the first. Kind of like your first love. Peace out, be blessed. Now go out and in joy your rides.
I thought this was a Retro Review
Might as well be, it's been 10 yrs
2010 isn't retro...
I probably would have been pissed off, but I'm glad I was able to get into a slightly used 2010 GT for about $10k less than the guy who brought it new. I love the look and sound which is what i was after most.
I hear ya man. I'm sure 315 some horsepower is plenty too. Mustangs sound so good, 4.6 or 5.0.
Are you still alive? your comment is becoming retro.
5.4 is best
Awesome 👍👍 2010 Ford Mustang review .
Wow, I've been shopping for one of these and have yet to find one with the nav and rear view screen.
hey man when i saw those LED sequential turn lights I was like DAMN! and its standard too!
I ❤ Ford Mustang's.
Mustang's what?
@ADD8oi I do believe you're correct on that. The GT500 had a ''as tested'' 0-60 run of about 4.2 and would be much lower if not for it having a habit of spinning its tires from first all the way through third. And yes, the LRA is intended for drag, but the other fact is they're cheap, dependable, easy as hell to work on, and cheap and quick to replace and you'd have to do some major damage to actually break one as opposed to a IRS system.
Motorweeks slogin should be: " your host since the big ban, john davis"
Big bang?
Love my 2010 GT.. I’ve owned a few from 93 to 99 cobra.. This one is by far is my favorite!!
ok that's it am in love with the mustang again! I still have about 2 yrs until the new engines comes in...i'll save up for u Mustang :)
@ADD8oi Very true. But have you ever watched how much actual contact patch they have from the factory? It rivals that of a Honda Civic...most GT500 owners suggest that before even driving off the showroom floor that you should get wider tires with thicker sidewalls. But yes, it's cheap, and you can put loads of power in a stock rear end and never have to worry about blowing it out, and if you somehow do, it's a quick change.
Beautiful!!! 😍😍😍
i cant imagine how angry the people who bought 2010 GTs were when they rolled out the 5.0 the next year
Yeah but the new 6 spped transmission is garabage!! I own a track pack 2010GT. My buddy has a 2012 GT. We still both have our cars. Mine is mint w 62k his has 85k and 3 transmissions later...ive never even had an issue with my car and its 13 years old now.
Why am i watching this 11 years later?
So much better looking than the 05-09 Stang, but man crazy to think what an upgrade came in the very next MY
Definitely not better looking. Looks way less retro and the squish back end looks terrible. The 05-09 stance was much better.
Best modern body style in my opinion
Should have sold these to the UK with left hand drive, I’m sure they’d have sold well. Beautiful car.
I SEEK MONSTER PERFORMANCE!
@toyoracing89 they are wide, but like my buddy's older gt500, an 08, the front tires are thicker than the rears, which is even more pronounced in the 2011 GT500 with its 20 inch rims, they are however great due to their practicality, you dont want to pay in the 4 digits if you snap your rear axle, the 8.8" is used universally in fords new and old line-up, thankfully the V6 has upgraded to it aswell as a locking diff, Domestic FTW lol
This is ultimately my fav looking one. 10-12
I bought a new '12 and I still have it. I preferred it over the '13.
the shifter is just absolutely just butter smooth and the clutch is soft as a baby's bottom! haha
the 2010-present Ford Mustang is assembled in
Flat Rock, Michigan, USA
it was nice to see Ford finally dump the Fairlane front suspension on the Stangs. Now if they can lighten up the car!
Thanks fo clearing that up for me lol
and so have have I. I always said why the 300 hp or 315hp mark where is the 340+ hp mark and so many people drive them too
Now would they give the cheaper V6 model more power than the GT of the same model year?
I have heard that the 2011-2012 GT will be getting more power to compete better with the new Camaro.
such an amazing improvement, I'm impressed.
I want to own my a mustang one day, I like this style better then the newer ones
I LOVE IT!! im getting mine next year.. im waiting for the 5.0 =D
So how do you like it
Gts look so sweet in black paint
This car seems really old but I was a junior in college...man I'm getting old
Just got an 2011 with 27,000 on the ODO. Man, it's a blast, and what a looker! However, I think the 4.6 sounds better.
@FLLMTR I think 36,000 is a decent price for what you get. it's smooth enough ride to be a DD, and the gas mileage is amazing for the power, there's alot of interior features... such as the navigation with microsoft sync.. ac is easy to control... i'd rather have a top of the line 5.0 then a new BMW or Mercedes...
how u know 20111 will bring 5.0?
dude thats exactly what im waiting for
Can you put that same cold air induction system that comes standard on the GT on the V6 too?
9 years later nope just get a ecoboost stang
Actually, the ecoBoost 3.7 Litre V6 twin turbo that is currently in the Taurus SHO will be going to the '11 Mustang. Aside from the engine, that antenna in the rear really sours the look.
am probably gonna catch some flack for this but i always wonder how much better mustang would be if they only started putting in independant rear suspension yearsssss a go..
well they did in the new edge cobras, 1999-2004
Ford's reason when the 2005 retro Mustang was released is that it was to reduce costs and weight. Otherwise you can't have a Mustang that is at $30,000 below. Well it makes sense, cause it is a lot more affordable than the Camaro or the Challenger at that time. But I agree that they should have put an IRS when the SN95 chassis retro Mustang came out, it is fine at handling the power at the 350 hp range, but when it comes to the Shelby GT500 at 540 hp it struggles to put down that power. But the good thing is the Mustang has a very balanced chassis, in which it is predictable when the rear wheels will start to break traction.
Yea i guess, but man such a missed opportunity from ford, am sure the guys that like to go strait had something to do with it
I never heard customers complain about it, mostly the automotive press did the complaining.
@@bullitt3980 maybe your friends, but mine did so many would of bought one
@Ronnie51026 lol in every race the mustaang pulls hard, hell ive raced a bunch of 2ss's in my new 5.0.....they lost big time
What stunk about the 2010 Mustang GT was that they had a 4.6L and then 2011 came the 5.0L V-8.
Scott S the 4.6 isnt that bad. Made 315 hp and 325 torque on 87 octane which isnt shabby
@@redfire281GT with bolts on
darkhoasi7k no thats stock flywheel hp
4.6 all the way. I like the 2v 4.6
MOPAR ARTS 392HEMI the 4.6 sounds way better than the 5.0.
hello sir! can i have the '10 Shelby GT500 please?! thank you.....
@toyoracing89 i used to have the 4.0 mustang which had the 7.5" LRA, snapped like a twig after TTs, but i agree, nope ford uses the 8.8" differential in its production vehicles now, well all except the explorer 4.0 and rangers, IRS is great handling but it becomes flimsy under massive stress, the likes of which trucks and drag cars see
Remind Me of Classic 1968 and 1969 Fastback.
I like how they compare the GT and then show pictures of the V6 Camaro and V6 Challenger and not the V8 trims of either
Motorweek! Still looks the same as it did in the 90's Kinda funny. You guys get some 4 K cameras, some drones and get on top of it already!
how?
14 years after 🔥
Also for those of you who say how mad people who just bought a 2010 were because a year later they introduced the 5.0
I have a 4.6 mustang myself and I’m not complaining
300 horsepower is still a lot
It may not be as fast as a 5 liter but it can probably beat my cousins 2003 V6 Mazda
That’s good enough for me
And you good fellow are a true car enthusiast. A 300 up V8 would be way more than enough for me.
Everyone ignores the $4000 rebate on the 2010 ... .
Why does 2010 look like 1995?
good looks inside and out plus good performance,
but it looks like it sits up pretty high, $28,000 base price for the GT :O plus for its size the 4.0 v6 is kinda lacking compared to other cars like the 250hp 3.5 v6 in the challenger or the 300hp v6 in the upcoming camaro, or even the 210hp 2.0t in the new G coupe
if i was in the market for a sporty coupe i would consider the Hyundai Genesis coupe as another rival for the mustang
compettion is hot so they had to make the new one good. damn good. i mean the camaro is and always was king, so itll be the one to buy. but if u luv mustangs and i do, even though i bought an lt4 camaro this new mustang is the way to go. especially this amazing interior
@knytrydr73 Because all three cars follow the exact same princibles. V8, RWD, 2 door, and to be a two seater masked as a 4 seater family car (exactly like the old days). Granted, they've all obviously gone their seperate ways as to how to display those points. But they all basically have the same purpose.
I think the 2010 is really a good deal, sure it isn't the 5.0 but other than that it's essentially the same. So it's cheaper and will handle about the same, less money spent on the car more available for mods
Plus its still almost just as fast anyway.
@@toxichudsoup1644 it's down almost 100 horsepower from the 5.0... not even close to being "almost" as fast.
@@TheOfficialCaseMade bro the difference with a 2010 4.6 and a 2011 5.0 in the quarter mile is only .5 of a second and .4 on their 0 to 60mph acceleration times.
So yeah, considering their power difference, the 2010 gt is pretty close. It wasn't until the new body style in 2015 where a big difference is made.
@@toxichudsoup1644 first of all, a half second is HUGE when you're talking cars.
Second, there have been PLENTY of bone stock 2011 5.0s into the 12s. The 3V isn't even close.
@@TheOfficialCaseMadeexactly, this isn’t even getting into the fact that a 3v will only push 500hp with a blower compared to 700+ for a blown coyote. Recently got a 2011 5.0 glad I waited and spent the extra cash for the coyote.
+1! Have an 05 GT w basic bolt ons
I had an '86 GT with 5M. Hard to believe in 2010 still only has a 5M, not a 6M.
I agree. Ford kept refusing to upgrade to a 6 speed even though GM had been using them in the Camaro for years. Hell the 98 Camaro had a 6 speed! Not sure of their logic
@Ronnie51026 us joking right? the 2011 Mustang GT goes 0-60 in 4.4s, does the 1/4 mile in 12.6s, pulls a .97g on the skid pad....the 2010 SS camaro does 0-60 in 4.8s, 1/4 mile in 13s flat, and pulls a .92g on the skid pad, the camaro go killed, nothings changing in 2011, 2012 the only thing different is that the 556hp Z28 is coming out, with a projected 0-60 of 4.2s, still getting owned by the mustang, wtf the camaro didnt even touch the 2011GT LOL!
Gt in 2011 doing 12s lol good one.
Can someone identify the background music in this review? like the rocky music :)
rokonjol mekongmekong
Ripped from Billy Idols white wedding.....
Not really sure but I in the reviews of the engines compared to the chevy engines they always said it was more efficient. It never said why but I'm just quoting Motor Trend and Car and Driver.
Ford is a great company for high value, reliable cars but I just wish they did more on the interior. They're always a full generation behind in interior design: while the 2010 mustang interior is a big improvement over the 05-09 model, compared to competitors like 370z and 200 camaro, the new interior is more like a good interior of a last gen car. It's not even a cost issue; somehow the higher management must be really conservative about these things or something. Exterior is great though.
@Ronnie51026 lol whats the difference? the mustang is actually a much better car around the track, but i race sfrom stoplights and ive been to milan raceway once and pulled a 12.66 on factory stock with a 6spd and 3.73 factory diff, no camaro can do that stock, the best i saw was a 2ss that did a 12.98, the camaro is 2tons, mustang weighs 3600lbs....thats a huge weight difference and the mustang makes the same power....derrrrrrrr
300 lbs makes a huge difference in the world of sports cars.
@Ronnie51026 so? its still 2 tons, its a tank man, it got KILLED by the GT 2011 Mustang
@toyoracing89 yeah the problem with the Shelbys are the massively low profile rear tires, for the power they make, im sorry but 25 thick tires are worthless if youre making anything over 350hp, and the cheapness is true, also the fact that the aftermarket community and choices are massive
Umm I think i've just became a Ford guy....
5.0L Gt 412hp.... 390tq.... WOW!
I used to go crazy over the SRT8s 6.1L 425hp and 425tq but..... 5.0 vs. 6.1... how does 5.0L make as much power as a
6.0L+ engine. I'm Very Impressed as now I do not have to buy a European V8 with smaller displacement that makes plenty hp.
I know its been 10 years but how old were you at the time?
Almost bought one of these, ended up with an 2008 GT instead 💯
I don’t like that they blacked out the horse logo on the GT
And the same goes for people who do it themselves on their cars
What good is that beautiful horse logo if you can’t see it
It makes no sense to me
I love my bastard year mustang.
I wouldn`t go so far as to say the DOHC is more efficient then a pushrod OHV motor. They both have their own advantages and disadvantages.
What efficiency are you talking about?
OMG!!!!!!!!!! i want 1
this new born pony will be another eye-catching for modern muscle hope the dynamic trio (Mustang, Challenger, Camero) will have a fight of the title; witch muscle is better?! but for now, Long Live Ponies!!
@Stevenhiggles
Understood
@FLLMTR I do not think that the Mustang is overpriced at all :)
There nice cars. I own an 06 GT 5 spd only problem is NOT ENOUGH POWER. I would wait to buy until 2011 when the 5.0 returns.
Ford destroyed the relationship with mazda before word of Ford needing money got out. My company gets discounts with all ford products and when I tried to get a mazda for has specifically on their site said that they no longer are with mazda. This was around august
Imagine being suckered into buying one of these a year before the 5.0 came out.
ford did a mighty fine job in the design dept. of the '10 mustang. imo, it's one of the best looking mustangs yet.
Why do mustangs consume so much more fuel than their Chevy smallblock counterparts?
because the mustang is so much more fun to drive that you just can not get good ratings
I’m trying to reconcile that 2010 is 14 years ago.
the 5.0 is back!!!!
Wow man I can't believe the mpg rating on the v8 and even on the good for nothing 4.0 v6....24 mpg hwy for the v6 and 22 mpg hwy for the v8 in the year 2010? Its not even a big v8 at only 4.6 liters...I know I know its a muscle car who cares about fuel economy...but what I wanted to point out is that my bad ass 1997 camaro Z28 with a 4speed auto and larger 5.7 LT1 V8 rated at 285 HP and 325 torque gets 15 city and 24 hwy....same as fords good for nothing v6....what a great improvement Ford did with the new powerful and economical v6 for 2011...cuz its pretty sad that my bad ass camaro z28 got better mpg compared to this 13 years newer mustang gt...my 97 Z28 is bad ass cuz it can still take on mustangs that are 13 years plus newer.....not to mention that even in 2010 the mustang still don't have a 6 speed stick??? Why????? Camaro Z28 had a 6speed stick standard when it first came out in 1993......and by the way I'm not a hater As a matter of fact im trying to buy a 2010 gt but maybe I have to wait a couple more years so I can get real cheap in cash like maybe 5grand? I paid $2500 for my camaro z28 at 129k miles.....not a bad deal...
Jorge Lopez In my 2010 mustang gt, with the 5 speed, i have gotten 27/28 mpg highway if i baby it.
I have a 2002 4 speed camaro ss and I get around 26-27 hwy mpg lol
+Jorge Lopez i get the same mpg in my 2013 gt as i did in my 2002 WS6.
+Jorge Lopez What you guys don't yet understand is that while all the Camaro's get similar or better fuel economy from a bigger motor than the Mustangs, they have to be revved at a much lower RPM to do so. The 0.5:1 overdrive ratio in the Camaros means you're basically idling down the highway. In real world MPGs, the Mustang will likely do better as no one short shifts a pony car.
with six gears, it's easy to short shift an LS1 and get great gas mileage if you try. i did.
Imagine buying this car new and then the 5.0 and 6 speed came out a year later
No ventilated seats? C'mon, Ford. I can even see the blank where the bottom is supposed to be!
@ADD8oi Lol, true that bud. But as I said before...you would really have to do something seriously stupid to snap an axle. Because Ford spent a lot of time debating which to go with, LRA, or IRS and LRA was the best alternative. If IRS was so great and dependable, why is it that not even the lightest duty of pick ups or SUV's use them? Because they can take a shit ton of punishment and still go for hundreds of thousands of miles. I thought it was a 9'' with 3.73's?
What did you reply to me about? It says i didnt comment on this. Haha
its like asking how can a 2.0 engine put out close to 400hp without the need to super charge it. It all depends on what you work with. You can have the biggest engine in the world and still only push out little numbers or the same with the smaller engines. Ford is known for its advanced engines over the GMs old style for push rod (idk if they still do that). It works but its less efficient. I never really liked the Mustang really cause it was so under powered. Next year will be different.
says 315 on the video
I love Mustangs, but this is just one of those body styles that I never liked.