"Trei Culori" - Anthem of Socialist Romania [1977-1989]
Vložit
- čas přidán 23. 01. 2024
- Happy Little Union Day to Romania!
"Trei Culori" (Three Colours) was the national anthem of the Socialist Republic of Romania from 1977 to 1990. It was originally a patriotic song, written and composed by Ciprian Porumbescu in the 1800s. When the ruling Communist Party of Romania decided to make it anthem, the lyrics were revised to speak more of the PCR and communism. This was the last of 4 anthems used by the RSR, the others being "Zdrobite cătușe" from 1948-1953, "Te slăvim, Românie" from 1953-1975, "E scris pe tricolor Unire" from 1975-1977.
Trei culori cunosc pe lume,
Amintind de-un brav popor,
Ce-i viteaz, cu vechi renume,
În luptă triumfător.
Multe secole luptară
Străbunii noștri eroi,
Să trăim stăpâni în țară,
Ziditori ai lumii noi.
Roșu, galben și albastru
Este-al nostru tricolor.
Se înalță ca un astru
Gloriosul meu popor.
Suntem un popor în lume
Strâns unit și muncitor,
Liber, cu un nou renume
Și un țel cutezător.
Azi Partidul ne unește
Și pe plaiul românesc
Socialismul se clădește,
Prin elan muncitoresc.
Pentru-a Patriei onoare,
Vrăjmașii-n luptă-i zdrobim.
Cu alte neamuri sub soare,
Demn, în pace, să trăim.
Iar tu, Românie mândră,
Tot mereu să dăinuiești
Și în comunista eră
Ca o stea să strălucești. - Hudba
Thanks for uploading this!
Romanian here, I hope that is spite of past and present hardships, Socialism will one day return to our country
25th december 1989
Many greetings from Québec ! ❤⚜
@@crackingtoast8066 Exact, oamenii nu își dau seama, mai ales cei tineri cât de oribil este să trăiești sub un sistem totalitar.
Nu omule,nu o să trecem prin iadul statului comunist încă o dată
God forbid!
Trăiască Gheorghe Gheorghiu-Dej!
Trăiască socialismul și clasa muncitoare!
Dar cum va mai putea Iohanis să continue să conducă România fără 2 vacanțe pe lună în Maldive și avioane de milioane de euro?
Gheorghiu-Dej era um nacional-comunista de direita, assim como Ceausescu
Этот комментарий состоит более чем из семи слов для поддержки канала!
In Romania and Yugoslavia, they played the non-aligned movement and flirted with Western countries. After the counter-revolutionaries came to power in the USSR. for the peoples of Romania and Yugoslavia, it all ended with shooting.
Long live today's free Romania
Romania was in the Warsaw Pact, but the other infos u said are true.
Wild how close Little Union Day is to Ceausescu's birthday
sound gud, i really love Romania Communist (just Dej, not Ceausescu lol)
Gheorghiu-Dej was also a right-wing national communist and revisionist
@@GuntherFehlinger nah, i think he is Stalinist(just follow Stalin and Stalinism doesnt exist) if Dej is revisionist, give me some sources lol
Прикольно звучит
Based
Good 👍
certified banger
The collapse of the Eastern Bloc was due to Khrushchev and many subsequent leaders' utter failure to truly grasp socialism. May the new socialist age that inevitably rushes forth not repeat these same mistakes!
To achieve this, the MCI must be unified under maoism
it wasnt a collapse, it was an attack of the imperialistics forces
do you happen to have a discord server?
No. There is scryl's server which is jokingly made to look like mine and in which I am semi-active, but I do not own my own. There is also Mister Zhonghua's server which I am very active in, but also do not own (and am currently muted there for a few days)
My dad used ti sing this every school day in communist Romania. Worst Romanian regime that wasn’t occupie
Hope that socialism will make a return to our fatherland
Not the best socialist experiment, from a Marxist perspective. Great anthem though.
Every romanian who lived through communism will tell you that the government was more capable, even anti communists.
And why is that?
@@deanromania6748 Romanian leadership has largely neglected living standards of the populace and instead focused their resources on useless projects, like the Danube-Black Sea canal and Bucharest Palace of the Parliament that merely drained all the finances and took up much needed resources from productive labor. Because of this they took up a lot of loans from the IMF, similarly to Yugoslavia, and, as a result, a socialist apparatus had to perform market functions, which is a complete conflict of ideas. Not to mention the nationalistic and revisionist rhetoric proponed by Ceaușescu.
@@artelsov I don't really think you are Romanian because you are a little bit confused. First of all, the IMF loans were not taken by the Romanian Gouvernment to build the Danube - Black Sea Channel or the People's House. Ceaușescu started to take loans from the IMF in the early '70s. That's after he critisized the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. He used most of that money to buy technology from the West, he build thousends of factories and facilities with Western technology, a few examples are Dacia (French license), Roman Brașov (German license), Oltcit (French license), the Electroputere locomotives (Swedish license), the only Romanian Nuclear Power Plant located in Cernavodă (with Canadian "Candu" technology), and many more. With the IMF loans, he also built infrastructure, hospitals, thousends of schools, 4 and a half million apartments (the biggest amount of houses ever built in Romania in such a short period) and over 400 dams, ensuring Romania's electrical independence to this day. This also means that saying that the Romanian leadership largely neglected living standards is ungrounded. In the West, you people tend to think all 24 years of Ceaușescu were the same, but they weren't. The disaster portrayed in the media actually came in the early '80s. In 1981, IMF representatives came to Romania to tell Ceaușescu to pay back the foreign debt. He was nontheless unpleased by their visit and for some reason, that was his final drop. From now on, he wanted to pay back the foreign debt and develop Romania independently from both the East and the West. He banned all imports with the exeption of necessary products that were otherwise not available on the Romanian market. He introduced the rationalising of food, electricity and petrol. Heating was also scarce. In 1985, the IMF told him that he can relax the austerity measures and pay back the debt at a slower pace. This made Ceaușescu even more angry and decided to pay back the foreign debt even faster. By April of 1989, Ceaușescu payed back the entire foreign debt and made Romania the first country in the world to be completly financially, economically, militarily and politicaly independent. This was Romania's fight with the IMF. Many people are wondering to this day why didn't he drop the austerity measures after paying back the debt. In my opinion, I think he knew things weren't going great in the country, but he wasn't aware of the gravity of the situation. His subordonates highly understated the issues in the country when reporting them to him. Now, on the matter with him supposedly being a "revisionist", I never understood why do people on the left keep saying that. In his 24 years, he never instated any economic measures that even remotely resembled capitalism, he was a well-known enemy of Gorbachev and his pro-capitalist reforms. In 1987, when Gorbachev visited Romania, he and Ceaușescu had a massive argument. Ceaușescu was giving advice to Gorbachev on what to do in the Soviet Union and Gorbachev was having non of that. He shouted at Ceaușescu and Ceaușescu responded similarly. In May 1989, Ceaușescu declared: "Romania, through everything it has achieved, demonstrates that there's no going back. That we cannot even think that the wonderful industrial, agricultural and social facilities should be... privatised, to use a fashionable term nowadays. This represents going back to capitalism. For Romania, capitalism has vanished forever!". At the 14th Congress of the Romanian Communist Party in November of 1989 he declared: "Only socialism represents the future! This is why, critisizing whatever is bad, we should'nt drop socialism, but rather those that have only brought damages to socialism. What can be said about those who are now saying that we don't need socialism anymore, that we have to go back to capitalism, but they had high positions in a country or the other, did they work for socialism?! Anyone asks themselves this question! As it turns out, the logical answer is that they used their positions to bring damages to socialism, that they didn't serve the people and they don't think of serving them!". On the 4th of December 1989, there was a meeting in Bucharest between all socialist countries from the Warsaw Pact and while all leaders were saying we should go back to capitalism, Ceaușescu was the only one saying that we should defend socialism even by weapons, if necessary. On a social level, the only "conservative" measure was banning abortions, something Stalin did as well in 1933. On a cultural level, he went from somewhat liberal to stalinist (he instated a cult of personality). The really weird thing on the left is that if Ceaușescu did it, he's a revisionist, but if Stalin did it, he nontheless remains a "bastion of anti-revisionism". On the nationalist issue, Ceaușescu never promoted bourgeoise-nationalism. His nationalism was always left-wing as he was promoting the independence and right of self-determination of Romania, not the creation of some Romanian Empire or something. Sorry for the long comment by the way...
@@deanromania6748 Thanks for such a detailed reply! Getting one as such is much preferred to a sarcastic one-liner as most people do in CZcams comments.
Indeed, I'm not very well informed of Socialist Romania, as I myself am not Romanian but a Russian, and my view of it was largely formed by all the various discussions I overheard in left spaces. Still that's kind of on me for not being as educated on the matter, sadly but coming across worthy resources on Warsaw Pact countries is unreasonably hard nowadays. Perhaps you can recommend some works for reading on the topic? I would be very grateful.
Either way, thanks for a conscientious and good-spirited explanation :)