Doesn't sound like Brad Dourif, is that an impression or is the audio just that low quality? And Idk, I feel like the other Chuckys we've gotten look better, at least in the face department. The skin and that pink eye aren't great. Still a cool prop, though.
I do believe it is direct movie audio, you’re definitely hearing the audio compression, Gemmy stuff from like the 90s until 2008 were very compressed. As for the face we’ve definitely gotten more accurate, but compared to the sitting spirit one I think this one just slightly edges that one out, even if the face isn’t perfect.
@@MorbidMansion I think the shape of the head and mold on this one is better but the details of the sitting are better. If you combined them it would look pretty great
So once again, I got the years wrong. It’s not 2005 and 2006, it’s 2006 and 2007. I’ll make sure I get it right for the next video. -Morbid
Hi!
Dumbass
@@TheHalloweenAnimatronicChannelHello
@@MorbidMansion Hi!
GEMMY FROM 1998 TO 2007 IS Extremely good
Technology has come a long way.
Man chucky got jaundice
❤❤❤❤❤😊
Nice!
I made a bride and groom skeleton playlist
@@Blueyfan500 Cool!
Doesn't sound like Brad Dourif, is that an impression or is the audio just that low quality? And Idk, I feel like the other Chuckys we've gotten look better, at least in the face department. The skin and that pink eye aren't great. Still a cool prop, though.
I do believe it is direct movie audio, you’re definitely hearing the audio compression, Gemmy stuff from like the 90s until 2008 were very compressed. As for the face we’ve definitely gotten more accurate, but compared to the sitting spirit one I think this one just slightly edges that one out, even if the face isn’t perfect.
@@MorbidMansion I think the shape of the head and mold on this one is better but the details of the sitting are better. If you combined them it would look pretty great
@@MorbidMansion Also for the audio that makes sense, I didn't see why it wouldn't be him