Nice video man. I suggest to do more clips where u play lot of spots vs fun players. Maybe play 50-100z once in a while to get more more spots vs them.
Regarding opening KJo,QJo,JTo from early position with recs behind. Even if it goes multiway don't you think your edge is big enough for you to take it postflop with these type of hands?
If rec flats IP theres like 90%+ chance a BB reg can flat any 2 just to play vs the rec its going to go multiway and then i have a shitty offsuit hand,tahts why i prefer hands that can make nuts more often like low PPs or suited stuff.
@@HighEloPoker Got it, valid points! I might overvalue these type of hands in general when opening. Although I play a few limits under NL200, but think its a good concept to have in mind when moving up and facing better regs (knowing how to defend wider when recs are in the pot).
Little over 64k$ if i remember right....i dont play reg that much because i cant be bothered searching for tables and scaning every site trying to find a rec,also table breaks pretty fast and its pretty demotivating and boring to find a new table again haha,even tho u should play reg tables mostly thats where all the profit is...its just not for everyone depends what u like doing,me personally i prefer zoom.
U wanna 4B close to min because im eaither going to continue or snap fold with my BB polar range,however we were slightly deeper 110 i dont mind sizing up 1-2bbs i didnt see that in game but as a general rule if someone 4B to 30bb usually means they are kinda oldschool player not saying they are bad just not using the standard sizings.
@@HighEloPoker thank you for the clarification. When you say min, do you mean like 2x your 13 to 26 or actually go 23.5 here? In my case I would actually mind going absolute minimum less if we had huge stacks like 300bb+ type.. sending a message that I'm IP and I'm going to be annoying. While when we're closer to 100bb I try to make it more difficult to continue with more hands (even though your range is polarized there just as mine btw you still have these kind of bottom value range hands that have a tougher decision, also I think a lot of players are not polarized) because our positional edge basically goes down the toilet anyway with a 4bet pot spr. Thoughts?
2x so 26bb is good thats what i play anyways...and yes position matters a lot in 4BPs thats why we size down when we 3B OOP deeper from usual 12-13bb size to 10-11bb size but 90% of ppl still believe if we are deeper we have to size up which isnt true IF u are OOP,but if u are IP u size up huge deeper just cuz u are pushing your positional edge and OOP cant do anything about it,u can see solver going around 32-38bb depending on stack sizes and positions from where u are 4betting@@bilcozbi67
@@HighEloPoker thank you, loving this discussion. I was actually making that mistake then, going bigger on oop 3bets as effective stack grew bigger. To make it work I was using a much tighter though still polarized range, more than once I've ended up just flatting with kings against difficult players for example.. I need to try going smaller and keeping my range about as wide then? Or even go wider 3betting playable stuff by default?
Deeper OOP 3betting from the blinds u go more linear there is no more stuff like low frequency J4s Q5s QJo Q9o anymore but more suited playable hands suited aces,connectors and broadways and u use a smaller sizing than the default 13bb 100 deep@@bilcozbi67
Yep i was overvaluing AQo in this spot,in solver its 0.01 EV basically breakeven which means it will be losing call even if the guy is slightly under 4betting
Why does your play seem so bad? 2:25 triple barreling a fish with oesd. 6:01 90% of the time when fish donk in 4bet pots they have a pair. How do you not know that? And where is your hud and rng tool?
M8 even if the fish has a pair AK has enough equity to stack off in a 4BP :) ,also the JT hand if u are not bluffing these spots u are leaving money on the table fish is going to have so many pair+draws that he will fold otr more compared to solver they dont bluffcatch blocker hands they blufcatch hand strenght only
@@HighEloPoker With AKs you had 28.9% but you needed 39.3%. If fish donks with a pair at least 73.5% of the time, you should fold your hand. Dude, fish don't even know what hand strength is. They call with their guts. You're blocking fish's JT. You have worse hands than that to bluff with. You should be overbluffing regs not fish. And you didn't answer, are you using a hud and an rng tool?
Great content! Have you considered doing a microstakes play and explain series? It could be fun 😁
aways goooooood
Nice video man. I suggest to do more clips where u play lot of spots vs fun players. Maybe play 50-100z once in a while to get more more spots vs them.
Hey theres plenty of recs in 200 aswell u see all marked with purple tag
great videos man! at what time zone do you play?
Hey thx,umm mostly at mornings CET sometimes at evenings too if there are no games running in the morning that day.
Regarding opening KJo,QJo,JTo from early position with recs behind. Even if it goes multiway don't you think your edge is big enough for you to take it postflop with these type of hands?
If rec flats IP theres like 90%+ chance a BB reg can flat any 2 just to play vs the rec its going to go multiway and then i have a shitty offsuit hand,tahts why i prefer hands that can make nuts more often like low PPs or suited stuff.
@@HighEloPoker Got it, valid points! I might overvalue these type of hands in general when opening. Although I play a few limits under NL200, but think its a good concept to have in mind when moving up and facing better regs (knowing how to defend wider when recs are in the pot).
Hello, you're cool. How much rake did you pay on nl 200 for 600,000 hands?
Why don't you play regular tables?)
Little over 64k$ if i remember right....i dont play reg that much because i cant be bothered searching for tables and scaning every site trying to find a rec,also table breaks pretty fast and its pretty demotivating and boring to find a new table again haha,even tho u should play reg tables mostly thats where all the profit is...its just not for everyone depends what u like doing,me personally i prefer zoom.
What was it about his 4bet sizing that made you think he was a weaker player? When you had AQo in the BB vs BU. I thought his sizing was decent..
U wanna 4B close to min because im eaither going to continue or snap fold with my BB polar range,however we were slightly deeper 110 i dont mind sizing up 1-2bbs i didnt see that in game but as a general rule if someone 4B to 30bb usually means they are kinda oldschool player not saying they are bad just not using the standard sizings.
@@HighEloPoker thank you for the clarification. When you say min, do you mean like 2x your 13 to 26 or actually go 23.5 here?
In my case I would actually mind going absolute minimum less if we had huge stacks like 300bb+ type.. sending a message that I'm IP and I'm going to be annoying. While when we're closer to 100bb I try to make it more difficult to continue with more hands (even though your range is polarized there just as mine btw you still have these kind of bottom value range hands that have a tougher decision, also I think a lot of players are not polarized) because our positional edge basically goes down the toilet anyway with a 4bet pot spr.
Thoughts?
2x so 26bb is good thats what i play anyways...and yes position matters a lot in 4BPs thats why we size down when we 3B OOP deeper from usual 12-13bb size to 10-11bb size but 90% of ppl still believe if we are deeper we have to size up which isnt true IF u are OOP,but if u are IP u size up huge deeper just cuz u are pushing your positional edge and OOP cant do anything about it,u can see solver going around 32-38bb depending on stack sizes and positions from where u are 4betting@@bilcozbi67
@@HighEloPoker thank you, loving this discussion. I was actually making that mistake then, going bigger on oop 3bets as effective stack grew bigger. To make it work I was using a much tighter though still polarized range, more than once I've ended up just flatting with kings against difficult players for example.. I need to try going smaller and keeping my range about as wide then? Or even go wider 3betting playable stuff by default?
Deeper OOP 3betting from the blinds u go more linear there is no more stuff like low frequency J4s Q5s QJo Q9o anymore but more suited playable hands suited aces,connectors and broadways and u use a smaller sizing than the default 13bb 100 deep@@bilcozbi67
Are u sure hansen333 is a nit? Seemed to be 3betting a bit much. Maybe he sees you overfolding and decided to exploit?
his VPIP PFR are pretty nitty
He’s wild 3betting from the blinds. And postflop he’s a 0IQ 75cbet range bot
I ll fold AQoff vs that huge 4bt .
Yep i was overvaluing AQo in this spot,in solver its 0.01 EV basically breakeven which means it will be losing call even if the guy is slightly under 4betting
Pretty sure your reads about Hansen are not correct
Why does your play seem so bad? 2:25 triple barreling a fish with oesd. 6:01 90% of the time when fish donk in 4bet pots they have a pair. How do you not know that? And where is your hud and rng tool?
M8 even if the fish has a pair AK has enough equity to stack off in a 4BP :) ,also the JT hand if u are not bluffing these spots u are leaving money on the table fish is going to have so many pair+draws that he will fold otr more compared to solver they dont bluffcatch blocker hands they blufcatch hand strenght only
@@HighEloPoker With AKs you had 28.9% but you needed 39.3%. If fish donks with a pair at least 73.5% of the time, you should fold your hand. Dude, fish don't even know what hand strength is. They call with their guts. You're blocking fish's JT. You have worse hands than that to bluff with. You should be overbluffing regs not fish. And you didn't answer, are you using a hud and an rng tool?
Ofc im using it im playing online poker :)@@wannabe2700
@@HighEloPoker wannabe you sound like a fish talking like that you have no exp at these stakes if you have questions like you have