@Marcos Filho Who will pay for you to work if there aren't any rich people dummy? Who is gunna pay to create better computers and phones for you to leave stupid comments?
I mean, if people get together and buy GameStop stock, people can make this trending, we just need to want it .. keep spreading the word people! Those in charge will always listen to the universal demands so that they can stay popular and in power.
Correct! It is all lies. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!@@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
I feel like we all know this already and we want to help, but we can't do anything. Yeah we can all try do our part, but we aren't gonna see any success unless large organisations/government act NOW. 'Countdown' is a good start
Before we stop at this video maybe we should watch about a million more because stats also are pointing the opposite way of this guy. Research and then research some more! Watch people you don’t agree with and everyone else. What happened to Al Gore? He was afraid of rising water but bought a mansion on the beach!? Weird!
@@mrandmrshavechickens1475 That's bs, show us those stats and any reputable experts who claim that. Some rich person buying a mansion has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that sea levels won't rise and displace people in the future.
Never underestimate human stupidity. There was a time when I used to view environmental apocalyptic movies with fun and joy. Turns out, they were actually documentaries.
I have been watching and waiting for some of the harbingers that tell me that these monkeys may be right…once. None of the climate catastrophe predictions are coming true.
no, just op eds, via telling you what is true, according to the belief that eneergy will be a commidity that only the global elite will be allowed to defirne
@Edit your name but is it for sale? Lol. It's going to be a long time before life on Mars can be even slightly comparable to life on Earth. Living in lava tubes sounds good for a holiday but that's about it. Too bad we didn't continue with moon missions and build a base there years ago, then we could already have the infrastructure in place to do proper Mars missions. We'll get there, eventually, hopefully.
@@IndexKingOfC I don't know about you but I would call these event pretty messy. The largest fire season for the western US in history. The most named storms to hit the US in recorded history. The hottest September for the US in recorded history. A 53% increase in annual storm level events in the northeastern US. A noticeable slowing of the jet stream along with major ocean currents. The 70% reduction of global wildlife populations. The massive loss of glacial ice worldwide. Just to name some of the things that immediately come to mind.
because we are a global network now. evry country,race,religion is an obstacle we need to overcome3 so many People are still living in there own world with there own problems and can not even imagine one day we will be ONE. and evry country is afraid to make the first step, and get punished for it. because it is in a way still a verry scary thing! dont worry! we will get there! love from belgium!
@Marcos Filho Sounds strange. Poor people mostly have to think about everyday problems and getting more money and basically food, ones who is not poor can actually pay attention to problems that will affect them in the future.
@Marcos Filho If I were an evil leader, I wouldn't care that much about these problems. I would have lived like its all right. In a bunker or on the lonely island with the cleanest air/water, of course. So I disagree. We all should pay attention to what is going on and find best ways to change the future.
Johan is articulate and had defined the challenge well. But it is 2 years later and we are still heading at full steam to flip all of the tipping points.
15 years ago we had a chance we to not break 1.5. Your are experiencing what is called a "moving baseline". 15 years from now after someone like you will say the same thing. I remember rivers with 4 foot long Salmon, streams turned red from their migration. Windows that were covered in smashed bugs. I remember seeing my first Bald Eagle and the excitement I felt after we banned DDT and they came back from the brink of extinction. I remember snow staying on the ground for months. Now if it stays over night it is a big deal. I live deep in an agricultural zone and have not seen a butterfly for five years. This planet is changing pay attention.
It helps but is not a cure-all. The consequences of continued global heating will destroy plants & agriculture. Greenhouse gas emissions must be drastically reduced for our grandchildren to survive into middle age. No IFS, no BUTS, no MAYBES.
@@mikeharrington5593 It could be a cure all. Better food, healthier people (less strain on resources), carbon sequestering, restoring of ecosystems, increasing the capacity of the land to store water (thus restoring ground water), restoring of local climates, increasing biodiversity, increasing land yields, reducing the need for deforestation for farmland, limiting fossil fuel dependence to name a few... Let's not forget that about half of the world's topsoil has been destroyed by modern agriculture in an alarmingly short amount of time. And actually, plant life will do just fine. More carbon in the air means more plants (plants literally eat CO2). The question is whether WE will survive, because plants will do just fine. Saying that plants will get destroyed is not scientific in the least and is deliberate misinformation (or fear-mongering). So, in my opinion, a ground-up solution to restore the land (and potential "cure-all") is much better than reductionist top-down approaches that could end up doing more harm than good. I'm convinced that we will face food shortages far before we feel drastic climate effects and a solution that addresses both, like regenerative agriculture, is the literal definition of a "cure-all".
@@mikeharrington5593 Look at all the failed predictions based on the climate models and ridiculous claims made by activists and scientist activists. NASA Goddard Institute (GISS) and NOAA constantly adjust the same temperature data to produce "bogus" warming graphs. There is doubt about the validity of some of these adjustments. czcams.com/video/xMc1o2tUBds/video.html See why climate alarmism is ridiculous: czcams.com/video/Gh-DNNIUjKU/video.html It's not true that 97% of scientists agree with this climate alarmism. czcams.com/video/ewJ6TI8ccAw/video.html Dr Chris Landsea hurricane researcher at NOAA resigned from the IPCC saying "I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound". The Plenary Panel of political appointees at the head of the IPCC approves the outline of the IPCC report before the scientific authors are selected. The Summary for Policymakers is also written by them. Any scientific studies not consistent with the Summary are removed from the IPCC report. Or so says Climatologist Dr Richard Keen who seems to agree with Tony Heller as regards surface temperature adjustments. The video is from 2015. czcams.com/video/Gmc5w2I-FCA/video.html Dr Peter Ridd was sacked for telling the truth that the Great Barrier Reef was in excellent health, climatechangedispatch.com/climate-skeptic-professor-fired-for-telling-truth-great-barrier-reef/ Reports of GBR death have been greatly exaggerated. czcams.com/video/U2HjsF6w_Q8/video.html&feature=emb_logo See this example of climate propaganda which cherry-picks start and end dates to produce misleading graphs when trying to influence journalists and policy makers. czcams.com/video/8455KEDitpU/video.html As an ordinary person am I expected to believe the extreme alarmism from Extinction Rebellion & others who say climate trends are dangerous, and we have 12 years to save the earth before tipping points lead us to extinction. "We're saved. More than 12 years, here's why". It was a single reference in an IPCC SR15 Report taken out of context, which said this is where we would like to be in 12 years time. czcams.com/video/hgiEia7sv4U/video.html Even today scientific reports are produced giving exaggerated outcomes based on the thoroughly discredited RCP8.5 "business as usual" climate model, but these outcomes most scientists don't believe will ever happen. czcams.com/video/6SOEs0LzZCg/video.html If you have time, why not read What the Climate Wars did to Science by Matt Ridley www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/wha
Imagine what we could do to solve these problems if we worked together. So many look at this through the film of politics, and don't consider the ramifications of these changes.
@Marcos Filho @Marcos Filho I hear you....but by then there most likely be no time left to reverse the damage done back to where we weren't at the tipping point...we are already at the point at which later generation will suffer from the damage done, fixing things within our lifetime is already a pipe dream. Also Mars may be a better option, instead of the moon.
I'm only a young teen, not too educated on this stuff but I'm honestly scared of what is happening to this world, what if I die too young? And it's barely my fault. I can't vote, all I can do is try to spread the word. I live in Australia. The floods, the fires, everything, It's only worsening. Every spring/summer - devastating bushfires. Every autumn/winter - floods! And in between - dumb politicians making everything worse. 5 years ago we thought that was the worst of it, now some of us are simply losing hope altogether. I think the older generations left us to deal with all of the mess they made, and everyone has to help with this issue, ESPECIALLY world leaders.
Antarctic ice isn't growing, total mass is decreasing. There is some minor growth in sea ice cover in the western antarctic due to changes in local wind conditions, but where the propagandists are lying is sea ice, only a few meters thick is being traded for the loss of glaciers and ice shelves kilometres thick. I'm not sure what you are referring to by the "10 years" being referred to since the 70s, but the current deadline comes from the emissions scenarios in the 2014 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. If we fail to limit emissions before 2030 we don't have any realistic options for digging ourselves out of this hole.
Scientific consensus in the 1900s actually thought we had more time then we think we have now. Sure you can cherry pick a couple wrong scientists, but consensus has been pretty close to the mark over time.
What action should we take to save this amazing planet? While I questioning myself about this, I want you to always remember my friends, the future is here in our hands, all comes down in what we make of it right now, right here. Stay inspired, safe and healthy.
I agree with the comment above mine. I'm afraid there's no quick and easy answer. Lifestyle changes are undeniably important and do play a role, but the change needed that Johan talks about is so drastic and radical that that won't do it. There is SO MUCH we can do beyond that, because when people mobilise together they can achieve anything. And we have strength in numbers more than ever. And it's now easier than ever to mobilise, with social media. The problem is that all the things we can do are radical, disruptive and take putting our pride to the side. Thinking outside the box, not caring what we look like or what others think of us. We need to put pressure on the systems that rule us. All these things require high levels of hope, determination, and motivation. The quick, easy solutions are not the whole story, and those are all people want. To really find the answer we need to 1. look at past examples of radical change and how they were achieved, and 2. educate ourselves, listen to more radically-minded people in the activism world. They rub off on you
Funnily enough we just had record floods here in Australia, a year after record bushfires. Still nothing will change, humans won't voluntarily lower their standard of living which we need to do.
@jomin vijilin. I'm an ordinary person, no expert, and I take your point (see background). But It seems you can reduce CO2 emissions without reducing consumption, by eating beef cattle as veal could reduce the carbon footprint on these herds by up to 40%. The 2019 Australian Beef Sustainability Annual Update shows that the red meat industry reduced absolute emissions by almost 56 per cent from 2005-2016. www.sustainableaustralianbeef.com.au/annual-update See how a UK Salers herd aims to be carbon neutral by 2035 www.fwi.co.uk/livestock/beef/how-a-salers-herd-aims-to-become-carbon-neutral-by-2035?name=how-a-salers-herd-aims-to-become-carbon-neutral-by-2035&category_name=livestock%2Fbeef According to Red Meat Advisory Council, Australia aims for it's beef to be fully carbon-neutral by 2030. www.sustainableaustralianbeef.com.au/managing-climate-change-risk www.sbs.com.au/food/article/2019/08/05/carbon-neutral-beef-it-guilt-free-steak-environmentally-aware This newspaper article claims "The use of mob-grazing methods produces "healthier grassland, cattle grazed on rotation are said to increase the soil’s capacity to store carbon"... and can even reverse C02 emissions. www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/cows-beef-farming-reverse-climate-change-global-warming-a8202121.html Also it seems there is no increase in the number of ruminants on the planet, the number is roughly the same as 300 years ago when massive herds of bison roamed the earth (and methane emitting non ruminate elephants) . Satellite data does not show any evidence of high emissions of methane over Brazil and Ethiopia caused by the large cattle herds there. Are cows changing the climate? This presentation by the Global Warming Policy Forum concludes not. czcams.com/video/GJ1LImHvdxw/video.html See website of Cows Milk and Climate. Clarifications by Professor Dr Peer Ederer www.milkandclimate.com/ Background: czcams.com/video/f9cwa9QD7gw/video.html
Per kg of meat eaten, lamb produces most C02 . . at 39.2 kgC02 emitted. Beef 27 kgC02 emitted. Pork 12.1 kgC02 emitted. Chicken 6.9 kgC02 emitted. Source: see background video
[Correction:] "With the global population expected to reach 9 billion from its present 6 billion in 2050, meat consumption is expected to double, according to Prof Cledwyn Thomas, Nov 2010". www.thecattlesite.com/articles/2577/reducing-livestock-greenhouse-gas-emissions/ www.thecattlesite.com/focus/5m/2209/beef-sustainability-environment www.thecattlesite.com/focus/5m/2206/beef-sustainability
There is a need of actions to be taken at government and corporate levels.. Builders are making concrete forests 10 times of demand by cutting natural forests, and there loans become burden on economy.. there are plethora of such examples..if global leaders will take strict actions, there may be some positive impacts..👍
Do not get excited. They will not stop that. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
I feel like I'm living in a "Monty Python" skit. "This Parrot is Dead" "You sold me a Dead Parrot, No I didn't he's just stunned". All of this Climate B.S. would disappear if we just brought back Mental institutions and locked them all up in the Hotel Happy
People have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. You are being misled. Wake up!
Whom Can We Trust If No One Is Trustworthy? One of my favorite quips from Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Tom Sawyer is when Tom is defined as “a glittering hero…the pet of the old, the envy of the young,” and there were “some that believed that he would be President, yet, if he escaped hanging.” With these few words, Twain captured the essence of leadership in our world. Those who get to the top are the fiercest, most determined, and most ruthless. Today, the latter quality has become so intense that we can no longer believe our leaders, and certainly not trust them to have our best interest in mind. I am not accusing any leader in particular, or even leaders as a whole. It is simply that in an egoistic world, where people vie to topple one another on their way to the top, the one at the top is clearly the one who trampled over and knocked down more people than anyone else. Concisely, to get to the top in an egoistic world you have to be the biggest egoist. So how do we know whom to trust? We don’t know and we cannot know. All we know is that we are in the dark. In a culture of unhinged selfishness, any conspiracy theory seems reasonable, while truth is nowhere to be found. When every person who says or writes something is trying to promote some hidden agenda, you have no way of knowing who is right, what really happened, or if anything happened at all. The only way to get some clarity in the news and goodwill from our leaders is to say “Enough!” to our current system and build something entirely independent. The guiding principle of such a system should be “information only,” no commentary. Commentary means that information has already been skewed. Information means saying only what happened, as much as possible, not why, and not who is to blame and who we should praise. Concurrently, we must begin a comprehensive process of self-teaching. We have to know not only what is happening, but why we skew and distort everything. In other words, we have to know about human nature and how it inherently presents matters according to its own subjective view, which caters to one’s own interest. To “clear” ourselves from that deformity, we must learn how to rise above our personal interest and develop an equally favorable attitude toward others. This is our only guarantee that our interpretation of things will be even and correct. Once we achieve such an attitude, we will discover that the bad things we see in our world reflect our own, internal wickedness. Our ill-will toward others creates a world where ill-will governs, and so the world is filled with wickedness and cruelty. Therefore, all we need in order to create positive leadership-and to generally eliminate ill-will from the world-is to generate goodwill within us. When we nurture goodwill toward others, we will fill the world with goodwill. As a result, the world will fill with kindness and compassion. By changing ourselves, we will create a world that is opposite from the world we have created through our desires to govern, patronize, and often destroy other people.
Absolute correct. Today"s leaders want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. As a biologist I kept this quotation: Many well-intentioned people have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. Keep that in mind as well!
But I an afraid about my country Bangladesh. Cuz the people don't follow the rules of keeping environment clean and decrease global warming. They throw trashes to sea and here & there. Most of them aren't also aware of planting trees.
The pandemic presents an opportunity for us to evaluate some of our everyday life choices. The slow down in global economic activity should force business to reconsider products services and target markets. But.. People and corporations have shown themselves to be unreliable time and time again... Once there are no immediate incentives or deterrents there won't be any change to the state we are in. That's why we need laws and regulations. That's why we need the right law makers and enforcers in positions of government office. That's why we need voting age people to step up and be informed. Your little vote means so much.
(Right - Kurt, you write well.) That's why Bernie Sanders emphasized making world-wide corp's and billionaires pay their fair share! And MedicareForAll, and most of all, Global Warming. Unions which form the middle class and free college. An opportunity lost, but there are many young who loved Bernie. Maybe a president for 2028. Biden and Bernie started enough that if our side wins, not trump, and leaders like them keep up their climate plans (Bernie keeping Biden on the straight and narrow (no more oil and "natural gas") we'll be o.k. Yes, VOTE. Be an activist, too.
As regards flooding, the U.N. IPCC admits having “low confidence” in even the “sign” of any changes-in other words, it is just as likely that climate change is making floods less frequent and less severe. In a study on the climate impact on flooding for the USA and Europe, published in the Journal of Hydrology, Volume 552, September 2017, Pages 704-717, the study found: ‘The number of significant trends was about the number expected due to chance alone.’ ‘Changes in the frequency of major floods are dominated by multidecadal variability.’ ‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded (Hartmann et al., 2013) that globally there is no clear and widespread evidence of changes in flood magnitude or frequency in observed flood records.’ ‘The results of this study, for North America and Europe, provide a firmer foundation and support the conclusion of the IPCC that compelling evidence for increased flooding at a global scale is lacking.’
Nice homage to Buckminster Fuller & Carla Sagan at the end! However, this video only briefly alludes to economic change when the climate change movement is in dire need of becoming more structuralist in its focus. Unless we transition out of the market system and it’s incentives the optimisation of financial goals will externalise harm to the goals of ecological and social stability and public health. This systems clash needs to be the focal point of climate activism and this crucial insight needs to be conveyed in-depth alongside the Earth science. A monumental first step would be to get Peter Joseph to do another TED video.
Do not get excited. They will never realy do that. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
We can do it!! Although a global crisis needs global united effort, every citizen, community, city and every country leading by example today is critical! We all have the power to make a change.
this is the writing of a slave. The Globalist using Haarp, CHemtrails, Bill Gates Program, o DIM the Sun( Stratospheric Aerosol Injection), announced on CBC, Nbc, etc. Wake up slave,they want to eliminate us,period
The world is not going to come to an end in 10 years, even if temperatures rise. Temperature and CO2 have changed from low to high in cycles throughout earth's history. geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/glad-you-asked/ice-ages-what-are-they-and-what-causes-them/ "There have been five or six major ice ages in the history of Earth over the past 3 billion years". [Wiki]. "Current CO2 concentrations at 400 ppmv are low when compared with the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the past 300 million years or so which ranged between 1000 ppmv and 1200 ppmv." "in past eras [ it ] reached concentrations that were 20 times higher than the current concentration. . .the Earth is actually cooling, in the context of the total geological timescale. . .It is possible that . . .CO2 will increase normally in the course of the next 50 million years to 1050 ppmV or 2500 ppmV." www.biocab.org/Carbon_Dioxide_Geological_Timescale.html
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades. GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth. Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
"Current CO2 concentrations at 400 ppmv are low when compared with the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the past 300 million years or so which ranged between 1000 ppmv and 1200 ppmv." "in past eras [ it ] reached concentrations that were 20 times higher than the current concentration. . .the Earth is actually cooling, in the context of the total geological timescale. . .It is possible that . . .CO2 will increase normally in the course of the next 50 million years to 1050 ppmV or 2500 ppmV." www.biocab.org/Carbon_Dioxide_Geological_Timescale.html
@@andrewwilliams9312 skewed data there Andrew! If and when it was ever that high... how was it measured? It would have had to be an extinction event in any case because the true levels that have been recorded in the past few hundred years have shown and increase from 100+ppm previously to 200+ in post industrial times, and yes about double that now. That data You linked is simply designed to make you feel like it's all natural and We don't need to stop using fossil fuels and most likely by a fossil fuel company-"scientist" and funded by a fossil fuel company to preserve their obscene profit, not this beautiful planet.
Hey everybody we only had two jobs on planet Earth as humanity. Take care of each other as brothers and sisters. And take care of this garden which is Earth. Not doing a very good job are we
1970: 10 more years to stop global cooling!! 1980: 10 more years to stop global warming!! 1990: 10 more years to stop acid rain!! 2000: 10 more years to stop global warming!! 2010: 10 more years to stop climate change!! 2020: 10 more years to stop climate change!!
I'd love to be able to say that I believe that this and many other messages like it will make a difference... But it won't. Humankind is way too selfish and greedy to give a flying fig about what happens to their children's generation... If humanity had an ounce of 'humanity', we would have eradicated poverty and starvation globally by now. But we haven't because we are all too busy protecting what we have worked to obtain. None of the wealthy westerners want to have their standard of living eroded by generosity to the pourer nations. With that as a backdrop to the climate crisis, this message is just blowing in the wind. What little change that will happen, will be too little and too late to make much, if any, difference... Thankfully, I'll be dead by then... I just feel so sad for the kids of today!
The Mice once called a meeting to decide on a plan to free themselves of their enemy, the Cat. At least they wished to find some way of knowing when she was coming, so they might have time to run away. Indeed, something had to be done, for they lived in such constant fear of her claws that they hardly dared stir from their dens by night or day. Many plans were discussed, but none of them was thought good enough. At last a very young Mouse got up and said: "I have a plan that seems very simple, but I know it will be successful. All we have to do is to hang a bell about the Cat's neck. When we hear the bell ringing we will know immediately that our enemy is coming." All the Mice were much surprised that they had not thought of such a plan before. But in the midst of the rejoicing over their good fortune, an old Mouse arose and said: "I will say that the plan of the young Mouse is very good. But let me ask one question: Who will bell the Cat?"
We need to stop blaming big corporations, it's also our responsibility, at this point everything counts, start being a responsible consumer, change your diet, buy to local farmers..., but do something!!!!!!!!!!
Oh God! Only 8 years left! It's always 10 years away. Grass will be growing in our jaw bones and still the climate crisis will not have happened. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past.
"The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past." NO, the Earth hasn't been this warm for ~125,000 years. The RWP and MWP were just regional events. "It also warmed faster in the past." The last time the Earth warmed this rapidly, ~95% of marine life died off as did 70% of life on land, including everything over 90 pounds. So yeah, if you want to trigger a mass extinction event, rapid and sustained man-made global warming, ocean acidification and ocean de-oxygenation would definitely accomplish that.
@@karlwheatley1244 It was warmer during the Medieval (Elbert, 2013, 2.9°C above present), Roman (Margaritelli, 2020), 2°C above present, also Wang et al, 2013, showing the change was at least hemispheric, and Minoan Warm Periods (Lécuyer, 2018, 4°C above present, links Mediterranean to Greenland Ice so at least hemispheric). It was certainly warmer during the Holocene Climatic Optimum, so during our current interglacial. If you want a citation, try Quaternary Research Volume 53, Issue 3, May 2000, Pages 302-311. This makes the point that it was upto 7°C warmer on the shores of the Arctic during that time, with trees growing on the shores of the ocean (which would have been ice free in the summer - so don't worry about an ice-free Arctic), far to the north of the current treeline.
@karlwheatley1244 The big problem for you doomists is peak interglacial warmth is not now but around 8,000 years ago. Proxies show a downward trend to the present day but with an interruption for the Medieval Warm Period (that doomists aren't allowed to believe in) followed by a decent into the The Little Ice Age (which doomists think also didn't exist), and a very slight recovery to the present day still below MWP though. Now I know what you're going to say about the supposed rapid warming over the last century but that's not a fair comparison. That's instrumental, with annual instrumental measurements compared with proxy data, whose the resolution is 200 years. If we smooth out the current data over the last two centuries you'd be lucky to see ½ degree per century. Your rapid warming disappears, and a very large number of bicentennial periods over the last 16,500 years warm at a faster rate (than 0.5°C/century). And let's not forget the Dansgaard-Oeschger events. The Dansgaard-Oeschger events were global (Dima et al, 2018). One about 11,500 years ago, averaged annual temperatures on the Greenland ice sheet increased by around 8°C over 40 years, in three steps of five years, but a 5 °C change over 30-40 years is more common for these events. So shall we say a rate of change about 20°C per century. If that happened now you'd be foaming at the mouth, but it's all within the range of natural events.
@karlwheatley1244 As regards ocean acidification, it is estimated that the ocean’s global mean surface pH may have declined (i.e., become less alkaline and thus more “acidic”) by -0.07 to -0.08 in the last 200 years - from pH8.12 during pre-industrial times to 8.04 to 8.05 today (Wei et al, 2015). N.B. The decline in pH occurred before 1930. However, and very importantly when you look the data after CO2 emissions began rising precipitously in the 1930s, the oceans have become less “acidic”!!! By way of comparison, from one season to the next, or over the course of less than 6 months, pH levels naturally change by ±0.15 pH units, or twice the overall rate of the last 200 years. On a per-decade scale, the changes are even more pronounced. Oceanic pH values naturally fluctuate up and down by up to 0.6 U within a span of a decade, with an overall range between 7.66 and 8.40. This decadal rate of pH change is larger than the overall 200-year span (0.07-0.08) by a factor of 8. Indeed the daily noted maximum pH range of 0.7 (Santos et al. 2011) is far greater than the overall change predicted between now and the end of the century.
@@OldScientist Thanks for your reply. "Proxies show a downward trend to the present day but with an interruption for the Medieval Warm Period (that doomists aren't allowed to believe in) followed by a decent into the The Little Ice Age (which doomists think also didn't exist), and a very slight recovery to the present day still below MWP though." No, we're ~.9 degrees warmer on average GLOBALLY than during the MWP, and our emissions are warming the planet 10-20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age. "If we smooth out the current data over the last two centuries you'd be lucky to see ½ degree per century." That would be unscientific fudging of the data--including 140 years in which we weren't burning CO2 at anything close to current rates. More than half the human emissions ever happened in just the last 35 years--and that has accelerated the rate of global warming and the rate of global sea level rise has also accelerated. "The Dansgaard-Oeschger events were global (Dima et al, 2018). One about 11,500 years ago, averaged annual temperatures on the Greenland ice sheet increased by around 8°C over 40 years, in three steps of five years, but a 5 °C change over 30-40 years is more common for these events.": A couple of points: First, Greenland is just around .4 percent of the surface of the Earth, so you don't get to pretend the whole planet had the same amount of warming. The D-O events were globally synchronous events in that there was SOME type of climate disruption triggered elsewhere, NOT that everywhere had just as much warming at the same time. As a paper in PNAS reported six weeks ago... "Furthermore, we identify a decreasing trend in the amplitude of DO transitions with increasing distances from the North Atlantic region. This provides quantitative observational evidence for previous suggestions of the North Atlantic region being the focal point for these archetypes of past abrupt climate changes." Furthermore, DO were cyclical disruptions with the most dramatic effects in the North Atlantic, but our emissions will keep making the whole planet warmer and warmer, and warmer and warmer until we stop our emissions. Take care.
@Marcos Filho The old "cut off your nose to spite your face trick" eh? Greedy people will still be greedy after you burn the rain-forests, but probably not so much after self-awareness. (Just My experience-based opinion though and I do see Your point).
@Marcos Filho if you believe that burning the forests is the solution you are the embodiment of the expression "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing". You don't seem to understand how important preserving the forests are to supporting life on Earth You don't understand greed either. Greedy people will not stop being greedy if you burn the forest. Greed is insatiable. Greed wants it all! Wake up and take responsibility for your words, stop saying such ridiculous things that they sound like trolling, because whether you are trolling or not, you may influence the thinking of people even more stupid than you, to actually burn the forests, which would be disastrous and move Us further away from the solution of the protection and preservation of the biospheres that support healthy air and water, healthy plants animals and people, and all life on Our Planet. 🌍🌎🌏
Didn't we already pass some kind of threshold with CO2 emissions?...I thought we had 10 years, 10 years ago...When was the first Earth Day?....I feel like I've been hearing the same thing since Rachel Carson's Silent Spring....
Er, you do realise that the last IPCC report (2021) confirmed we have now triggered irreversible changes? And that the big one, the Doomsday Glacier, hangs by a thread. We thought we had ten years. And it turns out that was about right. I feel like the scientist at the end of Don't Look Up.
For the last 40 years I've been hearing people say, "it's not too late, we can make it if we just change our ways now". We never changed our ways. Around 30 years ago, based on the ecological trends of the day, I modelled WWIII starting in the late 2020's and I see no reason to change that estimate now. It's too late people it's far, far too late. So take care of yourself and your family as best you can. We're all in this alone.
The Club of Rome made predictions about business as usual in the 70's leading to collapse of civilization in the late 2020's to 2030's, and it looks like we are on track.
Do not get excited. It is not true. They only want you to be afraid, to get angry with those, who live they normal life, to go out and demonstrate, to get in conflict...but this is all lie. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
@@carriefisher2644 Only if too many give up. Stop watching commercial tv news, who are funded by Oil Corp's etc. Some of us must be climate activists. Since I got too hurt to work long ago, I've done politics and climate activism. Help those who do now.
"This next decade will be a great turning point for humanity, as this great environmental change begins to alter the face of the world, as humanity faces a growing presence in the world from those beyond who would seek to use this world for their own purposes. They are not here to destroy you but to use you, seeing you as part of the resource of the world. Feeling this great turning point, some people will think it is the end-it is the end of humanity, it is the end of time, or it is the end of human civilization. And some people think it is a glorious beginning, a great new age for humanity of enlightenment and unity, of spirituality. But who can face the reality with the courage and the power of Knowledge that God has placed within each person? Yet this Knowledge is unknown in the world, except by a few. So they [people] fail to respond. They fail to prepare. They fail to recognize the growing signs of the world. They remain either oppressed in their nations where there is poverty or religious or political oppression, or they remain subsumed in their own personal preoccupations and desires and difficulties, heedless, unaware that their lives are about to change beyond their reckoning." A quote from an upcoming free online book by Marshall Vian Summers, titled *The New Way Forward for Humanity* - a part of a greater set of teachings called *The New Message from God* which you can explore in depth at *NewMessage.org*
Rabble! RABBLE RABBLE! RABBLE😝. Suggestion for simple solution. Have the ones who can do something, live in the areas where affect is needed. Survivor style. Have a matched economical situation to the average family income of that area. And have the community absorb them and not discriminate or ostracized, but to interact with one another in a communal way. Hear the stories of thosr affected and learn to have more of a developed compassion and understanding of a situation. Otherwise. Those who have, will. And those who want, will as well. Be the ones who do. Do make an effort for better. Do help who you can, when you can. Do choose a smile instead of being a troll. Do be better than you think you should be. Always try to make things better.
Do not get excited. It is all wrong. No such problem. People have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
The Arctic minimum summer sea ice trend is zero for the past 17 years. In the past few years it was almost as high as 1995. The probability that this could be due to chance has now dropped to 10% (after Swart et al calculations, 2015). If the hiatus continues until 2027, it will become statistically significant (p
Until the power dynamics between governments and its people are stopped, no one is going to fix anything because no one is going to change for the bullies we live under. We live in a co-dependent world and we're all suffering greatly from its dysfunctional dynamics. The tragic thing is that the planet and its inhabitants are suffering for it . . .
Sorry you said New York will stand in water by 1999. Also said there will be no oil by 2020. Also said there will be no water on the continent. Why fear mongering?
UN: the single most powerful thing people can do is to go vegan. Sensational video: the shock of my career, we have the technological answers, I fear, save our children. Countries will not do the right thing in time. Is up to us. Food: vegan. Clothing: second hand / sustainable sources. Transports: public transports, buy green energy vehicles. You want change, change your actions.
The world's population has grown explosively in the last 150 years, which is the reason for the environmental problems we now see. We must do something about it...
Man made global warming is a fact. In the 70's the ferns and other plants under the redwoods were above my waist, but was starting to thin out by the 80's. By the 90's there were around half as many ferns and plants on the forest floor. Now the forest floor of the redwood park I grew up a few blocks away from is nothing but sticks and dirt, with a few plants here and there. In the 70's it used to rain here on average 28 days during the summer months alone. Now we are lucky to get that much rain in the entire year. Since they started keeping track in 1930, 17 of California's 20 biggest fires happened in the last 20 years. That was before this year. I now live a few miles away from what used to be California's largest fire ever at over 400,000 acres. But there is a fire burning about 60 miles north of me that was over 1 million acres now. 4,000,000 acres have burned in California this year alone, many people have lost their homes (some lost everything), some even lost their lives. But because we are all lefties who disagree with their precious gop, the trumpers don't care at all. All they care about is "owning the libs." Well, I have some interesting news for trumpers: Most of the people who live in this county are republicans, but because of misinformed people like them causing so much destruction by trusting trump and people like him, many of them are voting for Biden now. It wouldn't even matter to any group other than trumpers what sort of people lived here though. But trumpers want to murder (or at the very least: let die) anyone who disagrees with their hatred, refusal to accept responsibility for the freedom of others, and their murderous intentions. climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/ nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html www.antarcticglaciers.org/2018/06/mass-balance-antarctic-ice-sheet-1992-2017/ www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ice-sheet/ phys.org/news/2018-12-greenland-ice-sheet-centuries.html www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/06/after-decades-of-ice-loss-antarctica-is-now-hemorrhaging-mass/562748/ www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2018/06/13/antarctic-ice-loss-has-tripled-in-a-decade-if-that-continues-we-are-in-serious-trouble/?.513e4487ea53 www.npr.org/2018/06/13/619543532/antarctica-has-lost-more-than-3-trillion-tons-of-ice-in-25-years www.antarctica.gov.au/about-antarctica/environment/climate-change/ice-sheets-and-sea-level-rise www.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/climate/antarctica-ice-melting-faster.html Here are just a couple more of the millions of articles that support this: www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/global-warming-real/ climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ blueprint.ucla.edu/feature/climate-change-is-real/ www.eartheclipse.com/climate-change/is-climate-change-real.html www.edf.org/climate/how-climate-change-plunders-planet/climate-facts en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change Do you trumpers care nothing even for the future of your own children? Is owning the libs really all that you care about?
@Aylbdr Madison Look at all the failed predictions based on the climate models and ridiculous claims made by activists and scientist activists. NASA Goddard Institute (GISS) and NOAA constantly adjust the same temperature data to produce "bogus" warming graphs. There is doubt about the validity of some of these adjustments. czcams.com/video/xMc1o2tUBds/video.html See why climate alarmism is ridiculous: czcams.com/video/Gh-DNNIUjKU/video.html It's not true that 97% of scientists agree with this climate alarmism. czcams.com/video/ewJ6TI8ccAw/video.html Dr Chris Landsea hurricane researcher at NOAA resigned from the IPCC saying "I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound". The Plenary Panel of political appointees at the head of the IPCC approves the outline of the IPCC report before the scientific authors are selected. The Summary for Policymakers is also written by them. Any scientific studies not consistent with the Summary are removed from the IPCC report. Or so says Climatologist Dr Richard Keen who seems to agree with Tony Heller as regards surface temperature adjustments. The video is from 2015. czcams.com/video/Gmc5w2I-FCA/video.html Dr Peter Ridd was sacked for telling the truth that the Great Barrier Reef was in excellent health, climatechangedispatch.com/climate-skeptic-professor-fired-for-telling-truth-great-barrier-reef/ Reports of GBR death have been greatly exaggerated. czcams.com/video/U2HjsF6w_Q8/video.html&feature=emb_logo See this example of climate propaganda which cherry-picks start and end dates to produce misleading graphs when trying to influence journalists and policy makers. czcams.com/video/8455KEDitpU/video.html As an ordinary person am I expected to believe the extreme alarmism from Extinction Rebellion & others who say climate trends are dangerous, and we have 12 years to save the earth before tipping points lead us to extinction. "We're saved. More than 12 years, here's why". It was a single reference in an IPCC SR15 Report taken out of context, which said this is where we would like to be in 12 years time. czcams.com/video/hgiEia7sv4U/video.html Even today scientific reports are produced giving exaggerated outcomes based on the thoroughly discredited RCP8.5 "business as usual" climate model, but these outcomes most scientists don't believe will ever happen. czcams.com/video/6SOEs0LzZCg/video.html If you have time, why not read What the Climate Wars did to Science by Matt Ridley www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/wha
*"We don't inherit the land from our ancestors. We borrow it from our children"*
- Native American Proverb
@Marcos Filho where do you get your information? Much of your comment is nothing but typical socialist ranting without any common sense.
That doesn't make sense, but i guess that's why only 1 person quotes the Indians.
@Marcos Filho Who will pay for you to work if there aren't any rich people dummy? Who is gunna pay to create better computers and phones for you to leave stupid comments?
@Shane d they got the message across, i think that should count. Stop trying to be “smart” for once!
@Marcos Filho you can’t help the poor by bringing down the rich.
3 years since and no significant change
Man, i wish this was trending so it will be seen by more people
Make a video eating pork. That is a trending video nowadays.
I mean, if people get together and buy GameStop stock, people can make this trending, we just need to want it .. keep spreading the word people!
Those in charge will always listen to the universal demands so that they can stay popular and in power.
~Tweet it -with me.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
Could always repost it on your social media, etc.
The people who need to hear and see this video won't bat an eye.
Any ideas to fix this?
@@jacktheripperVII
Can it be made profitable?
@@rainierpeters2532 if I knew how I wouldn't be broke
@@TJ-xt6pc when you speak the truth nobody will give you a like, that was from me
Sadly true...
These are videos that should be trending...
These are comments that should get 10k likes
It’s hard to keep people’s interest when they keep saying the same things for over 50 years and they’re wrong all the time.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
Correct! It is all lies. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!@@ChipmunkRapidsMadMan1869
I feel like we all know this already and we want to help, but we can't do anything. Yeah we can all try do our part, but we aren't gonna see any success unless large organisations/government act NOW. 'Countdown' is a good start
Vote and tell everyone else to vote and speak up when someone doesn't want to vote
Yeah the only way americans can really help is to elect biden at this point because trump doesnt believe in climate change
@@davidvazquez4873 While you're right, that's probably not nearly enough still. Biden is unwilling to make major changes.
Before we stop at this video maybe we should watch about a million more because stats also are pointing the opposite way of this guy. Research and then research some more! Watch people you don’t agree with and everyone else. What happened to Al Gore? He was afraid of rising water but bought a mansion on the beach!? Weird!
@@mrandmrshavechickens1475 That's bs, show us those stats and any reputable experts who claim that. Some rich person buying a mansion has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that sea levels won't rise and displace people in the future.
Never underestimate human stupidity. There was a time when I used to view environmental apocalyptic movies with fun and joy. Turns out, they were actually documentaries.
Really? Which ones have come to bear?
Don't be a doomer. Get angry, get active.
I have been watching and waiting for some of the harbingers that tell me that these monkeys may be right…once.
None of the climate catastrophe predictions are coming true.
no, just op eds, via telling you what is true, according to the belief that eneergy will be a commidity that only the global elite will be allowed to defirne
He's another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
"If we don't prepare now we will panic and fail. Last time I checked there's not another planet for sale..."
@Edit your name but is it for sale? Lol. It's going to be a long time before life on Mars can be even slightly comparable to life on Earth. Living in lava tubes sounds good for a holiday but that's about it. Too bad we didn't continue with moon missions and build a base there years ago, then we could already have the infrastructure in place to do proper Mars missions. We'll get there, eventually, hopefully.
Yep, Mars is a red herring... (1000 X more toxic than earth even after warming)
@@tradeprosper5002 red planet... red herring... ...I see what you did there xD
@John Bosevski ?
@@justlisten82 We f*cked up this planet, expanding into space would just mean we’d f*ck up more
I heard this same thing ten years ago.... And before this I heard it fifteen years ago...
And if we had heeded the warning 15 years ago, maybe we wouldn't be in this current mess.
@@carrdoug99 what mess?
@@IndexKingOfC I don't know about you but I would call these event pretty messy. The largest fire season for the western US in history. The most named storms to hit the US in recorded history. The hottest September for the US in recorded history. A 53% increase in annual storm level events in the northeastern US. A noticeable slowing of the jet stream along with major ocean currents. The 70% reduction of global wildlife populations. The massive loss of glacial ice worldwide. Just to name some of the things that immediately come to mind.
When explained so simply, how is it that people can still deny there is a very real correlation between how we treat the planet and the climate?
because we are a global network now. evry country,race,religion is an obstacle we need to overcome3 so many People are still living in there own world with there own problems and can not even imagine one day we will be ONE. and evry country is afraid to make the first step, and get punished for it. because it is in a way still a verry scary thing! dont worry! we will get there!
love from belgium!
@Marcos Filho Sounds strange. Poor people mostly have to think about everyday problems and getting more money and basically food, ones who is not poor can actually pay attention to problems that will affect them in the future.
@Marcos Filho If I were an evil leader, I wouldn't care that much about these problems. I would have lived like its all right. In a bunker or on the lonely island with the cleanest air/water, of course. So I disagree.
We all should pay attention to what is going on and find best ways to change the future.
@@westa8427
If life is a Matrix based simulation those who caused this and those who hide in their bunkers would surely not pass the test.
@@chyfields I prefer to think of this world as a huge... Accidental event. We all just see it through our beliefs, they're different.
Johan is articulate and had defined the challenge well. But it is 2 years later and we are still heading at full steam to flip all of the tipping points.
Then lets make a bunker.
Perhaps the LIMITS to GROWTH(
lie )in the book from Dennis Meadows
Last time I was this early, climate change was considered a real problem by both Republicans and Democrats and was not twisted by Big Oil.
That's what they said when I was in high school 15 years ago
15 years ago we had a chance we to not break 1.5. Your are experiencing what is called a "moving baseline". 15 years from now after someone like you will say the same thing. I remember rivers with 4 foot long Salmon, streams turned red from their migration. Windows that were covered in smashed bugs. I remember seeing my first Bald Eagle and the excitement I felt after we banned DDT and they came back from the brink of extinction. I remember snow staying on the ground for months. Now if it stays over night it is a big deal. I live deep in an agricultural zone and have not seen a butterfly for five years. This planet is changing pay attention.
Regenerative agriculture.
It helps but is not a cure-all. The consequences of continued global heating will destroy plants & agriculture. Greenhouse gas emissions must be drastically reduced for our grandchildren to survive into middle age. No IFS, no BUTS, no MAYBES.
@@mikeharrington5593 It could be a cure all. Better food, healthier people (less strain on resources), carbon sequestering, restoring of ecosystems, increasing the capacity of the land to store water (thus restoring ground water), restoring of local climates, increasing biodiversity, increasing land yields, reducing the need for deforestation for farmland, limiting fossil fuel dependence to name a few... Let's not forget that about half of the world's topsoil has been destroyed by modern agriculture in an alarmingly short amount of time. And actually, plant life will do just fine. More carbon in the air means more plants (plants literally eat CO2). The question is whether WE will survive, because plants will do just fine. Saying that plants will get destroyed is not scientific in the least and is deliberate misinformation (or fear-mongering). So, in my opinion, a ground-up solution to restore the land (and potential "cure-all") is much better than reductionist top-down approaches that could end up doing more harm than good. I'm convinced that we will face food shortages far before we feel drastic climate effects and a solution that addresses both, like regenerative agriculture, is the literal definition of a "cure-all".
Yes. Regenerative agriculture is a big carbon sink. Capture YUGE amounts of carbon and puts it back in the soil.
@@mikeharrington5593 Look at all the failed predictions based on the climate models and ridiculous claims made by activists and scientist activists.
NASA Goddard Institute (GISS) and NOAA constantly adjust the same temperature data to produce "bogus" warming graphs. There is doubt about the validity of some of these adjustments. czcams.com/video/xMc1o2tUBds/video.html
See why climate alarmism is ridiculous:
czcams.com/video/Gh-DNNIUjKU/video.html
It's not true that 97% of scientists agree with this climate alarmism. czcams.com/video/ewJ6TI8ccAw/video.html
Dr Chris Landsea hurricane researcher at NOAA resigned from the IPCC saying "I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound".
The Plenary Panel of political appointees at the head of the IPCC approves the outline of the IPCC report before the scientific authors are selected. The Summary for Policymakers is also written by them. Any scientific studies not consistent with the Summary are removed from the IPCC report.
Or so says Climatologist Dr Richard Keen who seems to agree with Tony Heller as regards surface temperature adjustments. The video is from 2015.
czcams.com/video/Gmc5w2I-FCA/video.html
Dr Peter Ridd was sacked for telling the truth that the Great Barrier Reef was in excellent health, climatechangedispatch.com/climate-skeptic-professor-fired-for-telling-truth-great-barrier-reef/
Reports of GBR death have been greatly exaggerated. czcams.com/video/U2HjsF6w_Q8/video.html&feature=emb_logo
See this example of climate propaganda which cherry-picks start and end dates to produce misleading graphs when trying to influence journalists and policy makers. czcams.com/video/8455KEDitpU/video.html
As an ordinary person am I expected to believe the extreme alarmism from Extinction Rebellion & others who say climate trends are dangerous, and we have 12 years to save the earth before tipping points lead us to extinction.
"We're saved. More than 12 years, here's why". It was a single reference in an IPCC SR15 Report taken out of context, which said this is where we would like to be in 12 years time.
czcams.com/video/hgiEia7sv4U/video.html
Even today scientific reports are produced giving exaggerated outcomes based on the thoroughly discredited RCP8.5 "business as usual" climate model, but these outcomes most scientists don't believe will ever happen. czcams.com/video/6SOEs0LzZCg/video.html
If you have time, why not read What the Climate Wars did to Science by Matt Ridley
www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/wha
I prefer permaculture
"Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth.'
--Albert Einstein
Imagine what we could do to solve these problems if we worked together. So many look at this through the film of politics, and don't consider the ramifications of these changes.
honestly. Humans can achieve anything if we work together and mobilise
you can! join your local just stop oil or extinction rebellion group 😊
The latter seems to be the most likely outcome to be true.
@Marcos Filho sir you right this stuff all the where
@Marcos Filho dumb
@Marcos Filho @Marcos Filho I hear you....but by then there most likely be no time left to reverse the damage done back to where we weren't at the tipping point...we are already at the point at which later generation will suffer from the damage done, fixing things within our lifetime is already a pipe dream.
Also Mars may be a better option, instead of the moon.
@Marcos Filho I rather no war would happen, may just a quick MAD scenario where every nuke just went off, that would be quicker.
"This is our mission: To protect our children's future."
I can hear the politicians and fossil fuel execs laughing.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
I'm only a young teen, not too educated on this stuff but I'm honestly scared of what is happening to this world, what if I die too young? And it's barely my fault. I can't vote, all I can do is try to spread the word. I live in Australia. The floods, the fires, everything, It's only worsening. Every spring/summer - devastating bushfires. Every autumn/winter - floods! And in between - dumb politicians making everything worse. 5 years ago we thought that was the worst of it, now some of us are simply losing hope altogether. I think the older generations left us to deal with all of the mess they made, and everyone has to help with this issue, ESPECIALLY world leaders.
Haven't they been saying "we only have 10 years" since the 70s? (Also, I like how they mention arctic ice melting, but not antarctic ice growing too)
Antarctic ice isn't growing, total mass is decreasing. There is some minor growth in sea ice cover in the western antarctic due to changes in local wind conditions, but where the propagandists are lying is sea ice, only a few meters thick is being traded for the loss of glaciers and ice shelves kilometres thick. I'm not sure what you are referring to by the "10 years" being referred to since the 70s, but the current deadline comes from the emissions scenarios in the 2014 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report. If we fail to limit emissions before 2030 we don't have any realistic options for digging ourselves out of this hole.
Scientific consensus in the 1900s actually thought we had more time then we think we have now. Sure you can cherry pick a couple wrong scientists, but consensus has been pretty close to the mark over time.
"When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect.'
--Mark Twain
WHAT IS LIFE
What action should we take to save this amazing planet? While I questioning myself about this, I want you to always remember my friends, the future is here in our hands, all comes down in what we make of it right now, right here. Stay inspired, safe and healthy.
Marcos, arson is not a solution.
You can't be serious dude SMH
Extinction Rebellion!
We as humanity need to come together. Diverse minds all put together brain storming. All skill sets needed.
I agree with the comment above mine. I'm afraid there's no quick and easy answer. Lifestyle changes are undeniably important and do play a role, but the change needed that Johan talks about is so drastic and radical that that won't do it. There is SO MUCH we can do beyond that, because when people mobilise together they can achieve anything. And we have strength in numbers more than ever. And it's now easier than ever to mobilise, with social media.
The problem is that all the things we can do are radical, disruptive and take putting our pride to the side. Thinking outside the box, not caring what we look like or what others think of us. We need to put pressure on the systems that rule us. All these things require high levels of hope, determination, and motivation.
The quick, easy solutions are not the whole story, and those are all people want. To really find the answer we need to 1. look at past examples of radical change and how they were achieved, and 2. educate ourselves, listen to more radically-minded people in the activism world. They rub off on you
They aren’t even trying to hide it anymore.
Who else is watching this while reading comments? 😂
Unfortunately me😅😅😅
what a stupid comment. "wHo ElSe iS a HUmAn ?"
@Marcos Filho www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/climate/al-gores-global-warming-deliberate-fraud-to-increase-governmental-power/
I'm very familiar with this deadly globalist agendas and the Stooge in the video,just read my comment above,sincerely,jack
Can we just take a moment to appreciate these motion graphics - they're amazing! Such an impactful ted talk, both on content and visuals.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
Funnily enough we just had record floods here in Australia, a year after record bushfires. Still nothing will change, humans won't voluntarily lower their standard of living which we need to do.
The future is cold; not warmth.
exactly,all lies
One personal action we can all take is eating less beef.
As a cattle rancher; I denounce this.
@jomin vijilin. I'm an ordinary person, no expert, and I take your point (see background). But It seems you can reduce CO2 emissions without reducing consumption, by eating beef cattle as veal could reduce the carbon footprint on these herds by up to 40%.
The 2019 Australian Beef Sustainability Annual Update shows that the red meat industry reduced absolute emissions by almost 56 per cent from 2005-2016.
www.sustainableaustralianbeef.com.au/annual-update
See how a UK Salers herd aims to be carbon neutral by 2035
www.fwi.co.uk/livestock/beef/how-a-salers-herd-aims-to-become-carbon-neutral-by-2035?name=how-a-salers-herd-aims-to-become-carbon-neutral-by-2035&category_name=livestock%2Fbeef
According to Red Meat Advisory Council, Australia aims for it's beef to be fully carbon-neutral by 2030.
www.sustainableaustralianbeef.com.au/managing-climate-change-risk
www.sbs.com.au/food/article/2019/08/05/carbon-neutral-beef-it-guilt-free-steak-environmentally-aware
This newspaper article claims "The use of mob-grazing methods produces "healthier grassland, cattle grazed on rotation are said to increase the soil’s capacity to store carbon"... and can even reverse C02 emissions.
www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/cows-beef-farming-reverse-climate-change-global-warming-a8202121.html
Also it seems there is no increase in the number of ruminants on the planet, the number is roughly the same as 300 years ago when massive herds of bison roamed the earth (and methane emitting non ruminate elephants) . Satellite data does not show any evidence of high emissions of methane over Brazil and Ethiopia caused by the large cattle herds there. Are cows changing the climate? This presentation by the Global Warming Policy Forum concludes not.
czcams.com/video/GJ1LImHvdxw/video.html
See website of Cows Milk and Climate. Clarifications by Professor Dr Peer Ederer
www.milkandclimate.com/
Background: czcams.com/video/f9cwa9QD7gw/video.html
As countries develop, they tend to eat more meat due to more $$$. Chinese certainly eating more pork than they use to.
Per kg of meat eaten, lamb produces most C02 . . at 39.2 kgC02 emitted. Beef 27 kgC02 emitted. Pork 12.1 kgC02 emitted. Chicken 6.9 kgC02 emitted. Source: see background video
[Correction:] "With the global population expected to reach 9 billion from its present 6 billion in 2050, meat consumption is expected to double, according to Prof Cledwyn Thomas, Nov 2010".
www.thecattlesite.com/articles/2577/reducing-livestock-greenhouse-gas-emissions/
www.thecattlesite.com/focus/5m/2209/beef-sustainability-environment
www.thecattlesite.com/focus/5m/2206/beef-sustainability
#6, "The Amazon rainforest is weakening and may start emitting carbon within 15 years". Welp...it didn't look like we needed all of those 15 years :-(
There is a need of actions to be taken at government and corporate levels.. Builders are making concrete forests 10 times of demand by cutting natural forests, and there loans become burden on economy.. there are plethora of such examples..if global leaders will take strict actions, there may be some positive impacts..👍
Do not get excited. They will not stop that. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
I feel like I'm living in a "Monty Python" skit. "This Parrot is Dead" "You sold me a Dead Parrot, No I didn't he's just stunned". All of this Climate B.S. would disappear if we just brought back Mental institutions and locked them all up in the Hotel Happy
It’s an interesting experience, being one of the last of a species and also being aware of it. I’m glad I decided to avoid having children
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
Ouch, the globalist already brainwashed you??
This video should be the most watched video on CZcams. The fact that it is not, means so much. We are doomed!
People have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. You are being misled. Wake up!
I thought we were going to reach a tipping point 15 years ago!
Exactly. More fear mongering with definitive objectives given many decades ago.
It's been "10 years to make a change" since... 50 years ago.
"t's been "10 years to make a change" since... 50 years ago" Yep. and that's why ecosystems are unraveling.
This needs to be in the trending page
We need to end low cost flights. Crossing the counrty for 50 bucks and getting away with the ecological consequences without paying isn't tolerable.
I agree every person should be able only to fly a certain number of times in a decade.
One more scientists denying we already are at 3c (1750 baseline) So strange what baseline he using 1990?
i don't know man
Lies
Whom Can We Trust If No One Is Trustworthy?
One of my favorite quips from Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Tom Sawyer is when Tom is defined as “a glittering hero…the pet of the old, the envy of the young,” and there were “some that believed that he would be President, yet, if he escaped hanging.” With these few words, Twain captured the essence of leadership in our world. Those who get to the top are the fiercest, most determined, and most ruthless. Today, the latter quality has become so intense that we can no longer believe our leaders, and certainly not trust them to have our best interest in mind.
I am not accusing any leader in particular, or even leaders as a whole. It is simply that in an egoistic world, where people vie to topple one another on their way to the top, the one at the top is clearly the one who trampled over and knocked down more people than anyone else. Concisely, to get to the top in an egoistic world you have to be the biggest egoist.
So how do we know whom to trust? We don’t know and we cannot know. All we know is that we are in the dark.
In a culture of unhinged selfishness, any conspiracy theory seems reasonable, while truth is nowhere to be found. When every person who says or writes something is trying to promote some hidden agenda, you have no way of knowing who is right, what really happened, or if anything happened at all.
The only way to get some clarity in the news and goodwill from our leaders is to say “Enough!” to our current system and build something entirely independent. The guiding principle of such a system should be “information only,” no commentary. Commentary means that information has already been skewed. Information means saying only what happened, as much as possible, not why, and not who is to blame and who we should praise.
Concurrently, we must begin a comprehensive process of self-teaching. We have to know not only what is happening, but why we skew and distort everything. In other words, we have to know about human nature and how it inherently presents matters according to its own subjective view, which caters to one’s own interest. To “clear” ourselves from that deformity, we must learn how to rise above our personal interest and develop an equally favorable attitude toward others. This is our only guarantee that our interpretation of things will be even and correct.
Once we achieve such an attitude, we will discover that the bad things we see in our world reflect our own, internal wickedness. Our ill-will toward others creates a world where ill-will governs, and so the world is filled with wickedness and cruelty. Therefore, all we need in order to create positive leadership-and to generally eliminate ill-will from the world-is to generate goodwill within us. When we nurture goodwill toward others, we will fill the world with goodwill. As a result, the world will fill with kindness and compassion. By changing ourselves, we will create a world that is opposite from the world we have created through our desires to govern, patronize, and often destroy other people.
Absolute correct. Today"s leaders want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. As a biologist I kept this quotation: Many well-intentioned people have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. Keep that in mind as well!
Suggestion for TED: Please stop spamming bots in the comments
How can you tell who's a bot?
@Sunpawz A Who, me?
Beep boop beep
@@mrandmrshavechickens1475 Beep beep boop
@Sunpawz A And a bot, for what it seems
Last time I was this early, Socrates was alive.
Johan Rockstrom should be a household name. 🚨🚨🚨
But I an afraid about my country Bangladesh. Cuz the people don't follow the rules of keeping environment clean and decrease global warming. They throw trashes to sea and here & there. Most of them aren't also aware of planting trees.
Great speech, so clear that I feel the necessity to change some habits in my life. Thank you
Yes! How did it go?
almost on the level of Hitler,Stalin Maocetung,you sheple
The pandemic presents an opportunity for us to evaluate some of our everyday life choices. The slow down in global economic activity should force business to reconsider products services and target markets.
But..
People and corporations have shown themselves to be unreliable time and time again...
Once there are no immediate incentives or deterrents there won't be any change to the state we are in.
That's why we need laws and regulations.
That's why we need the right law makers and enforcers in positions of government office.
That's why we need voting age people to step up and be informed.
Your little vote means so much.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
(Right - Kurt, you write well.)
That's why Bernie Sanders emphasized making world-wide corp's and billionaires pay their fair share! And MedicareForAll, and most of all, Global Warming. Unions which form the middle class and free college. An opportunity lost, but there are many young who loved Bernie. Maybe a president for 2028. Biden and Bernie started enough that if our side wins, not trump, and leaders like them keep up their climate plans (Bernie keeping Biden on the straight and narrow (no more oil and "natural gas") we'll be o.k. Yes, VOTE. Be an activist, too.
Permafrost becomes the carbon store?
As regards flooding, the U.N. IPCC admits having “low confidence” in even the “sign” of any changes-in other words, it is just as likely that climate change is making floods less frequent and less severe. In a study on the climate impact on flooding for the USA and Europe, published in the Journal of Hydrology, Volume 552, September 2017, Pages 704-717, the study found:
‘The number of significant trends was about the number expected due to chance alone.’
‘Changes in the frequency of major floods are dominated by multidecadal variability.’
‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded (Hartmann et al., 2013) that globally there is no clear and widespread evidence of changes in flood magnitude or frequency in observed flood records.’
‘The results of this study, for North America and Europe, provide a firmer foundation and support the conclusion of the IPCC that compelling evidence for increased flooding at a global scale is lacking.’
Nice homage to Buckminster Fuller & Carla Sagan at the end! However, this video only briefly alludes to economic change when the climate change movement is in dire need of becoming more structuralist in its focus. Unless we transition out of the market system and it’s incentives the optimisation of financial goals will externalise harm to the goals of ecological and social stability and public health. This systems clash needs to be the focal point of climate activism and this crucial insight needs to be conveyed in-depth alongside the Earth science. A monumental first step would be to get Peter Joseph to do another TED video.
Do not get excited. They will never realy do that. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
We can do it!! Although a global crisis needs global united effort, every citizen, community, city and every country leading by example today is critical! We all have the power to make a change.
this is the writing of a slave. The Globalist using Haarp, CHemtrails, Bill Gates Program, o DIM the Sun( Stratospheric Aerosol Injection), announced on CBC, Nbc, etc. Wake up slave,they want to eliminate us,period
i fear for the future of the human race because we a listening to people like Johan Rockström
The world is not going to come to an end in 10 years, even if temperatures rise. Temperature and CO2 have changed from low to high in cycles throughout earth's history. geology.utah.gov/map-pub/survey-notes/glad-you-asked/ice-ages-what-are-they-and-what-causes-them/
"There have been five or six major ice ages in the history of Earth over the past 3 billion years". [Wiki]. "Current CO2 concentrations at 400 ppmv are low when compared with the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the past 300 million years or so which ranged between 1000 ppmv and 1200 ppmv." "in past eras [ it ] reached concentrations that were 20 times higher than the current concentration. . .the Earth is actually cooling, in the context of the total geological timescale. . .It is possible that . . .CO2 will increase normally in the course of the next 50 million years to 1050 ppmV or 2500 ppmV."
www.biocab.org/Carbon_Dioxide_Geological_Timescale.html
@@andrewwilliams9312 thanks man, open some ignorant eyes ;) . its funny and scary how deep these doom-thinkers go with their believes.
It's because of people like you that our planet is going to collapse. Let's see if your skepticism holds up for about a decade and a half, eh?
The Great Barrier Reef's coral cover reached the greatest extent ever recorded in 2022, 2023 and 2024 (AIMS) despite reports of supposed repeated bleaching. If you look at the Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) data, the WIO (West Indian Ocean) shows 26% hard coral cover in 1985 upto 30% in 2020. South Asia reefs shows a decline around 2000 to below 25% then a regrowth to around 40% (2010) and a decline to 25% (2020). The Red Sea shows no change at around 25% (1995-2020). So the pattern in these three areas show no relationship to each other or to a changing climate. The Caribbean region reefs have a cover of around 0.15 ± 0.02. There is no evidence of a major reduction in coral cover in the Caribbean over the last two decades.
GCRMN data for the most important coral bioregion, the East Asia Seas, with 30% of the world’s coral reefs, and containing the most diverse coral of the ‘Coral Triangle’, show no statistically significant net coral loss since records began. The East Asia region has the biggest human population living in close proximity to reefs, and is located in the Indo-Pacific Warm Pool - the hottest major water mass on earth.
Life is most diverse in the warmest parts of the world’s oceans. This has been shown across 13 major taxonomic groups from zooplankton to marine mammals. Warmer water = more biodiversity. This is a scare story about things you cannot see.
I feel very sorry for people born today. There isn't much a future to look forward to if we stay on this dead end of burning fossil fuels.
"Current CO2 concentrations at 400 ppmv are low when compared with the average atmospheric CO2 concentrations over the past 300 million years or so which ranged between 1000 ppmv and 1200 ppmv." "in past eras [ it ] reached concentrations that were 20 times higher than the current concentration. . .the Earth is actually cooling, in the context of the total geological timescale. . .It is possible that . . .CO2 will increase normally in the course of the next 50 million years to 1050 ppmV or 2500 ppmV."
www.biocab.org/Carbon_Dioxide_Geological_Timescale.html
@@andrewwilliams9312 skewed data there Andrew!
If and when it was ever that high... how was it measured?
It would have had to be an extinction event in any case because the true levels that have been recorded in the past few hundred years have shown and increase from 100+ppm previously to 200+ in post industrial times, and yes about double that now.
That data You linked is simply designed to make you feel like it's all natural and We don't need to stop using fossil fuels and most likely by a fossil fuel company-"scientist" and funded by a fossil fuel company to preserve their obscene profit, not this beautiful planet.
Will anyone listen?
Hey everybody we only had two jobs on planet Earth as humanity. Take care of each other as brothers and sisters. And take care of this garden which is Earth. Not doing a very good job are we
1970: 10 more years to stop global cooling!!
1980: 10 more years to stop global warming!!
1990: 10 more years to stop acid rain!!
2000: 10 more years to stop global warming!!
2010: 10 more years to stop climate change!!
2020: 10 more years to stop climate change!!
I'd love to be able to say that I believe that this and many other messages like it will make a difference... But it won't. Humankind is way too selfish and greedy to give a flying fig about what happens to their children's generation... If humanity had an ounce of 'humanity', we would have eradicated poverty and starvation globally by now. But we haven't because we are all too busy protecting what we have worked to obtain. None of the wealthy westerners want to have their standard of living eroded by generosity to the pourer nations. With that as a backdrop to the climate crisis, this message is just blowing in the wind.
What little change that will happen, will be too little and too late to make much, if any, difference...
Thankfully, I'll be dead by then... I just feel so sad for the kids of today!
He heard this... like 10 Years ago
@Marcos Filho Pass the salt... :)
@Marcos Filho So you realize the best thing you can do for this planet is.... not be here, Right? :)
@Marcos Filho Bend over and show everyone your stick... ;)
It took 50 years to raise awareness and another 50 to agree on a solution. Tic-toc.
“How to convince humanity to give away their rights and freedoms voluntarily”
I’m afraid your comment is going over the heads of the masses.
imagine we didnt have covid this year to slow down our everyday lives and shut down the factories and stuff, the state of earth would be sm worse.
We don't need to take action to protect the planet, we need to take action to protect our species. The planet will adapt.
Exactly. The planet can and has been much warmer. We as a species cannot survive that.
The Mice once called a meeting to decide on a plan to free themselves of their enemy, the Cat. At least they wished to find some way of knowing when she was coming, so they might have time to run away. Indeed, something had to be done, for they lived in such constant fear of her claws that they hardly dared stir from their dens by night or day.
Many plans were discussed, but none of them was thought good enough. At last a very young Mouse got up and said:
"I have a plan that seems very simple, but I know it will be successful.
All we have to do is to hang a bell about the Cat's neck. When we hear the bell ringing we will know immediately that our enemy is coming."
All the Mice were much surprised that they had not thought of such a plan before. But in the midst of the rejoicing over their good fortune, an old Mouse arose and said:
"I will say that the plan of the young Mouse is very good. But let me ask one question: Who will bell the Cat?"
We need to stop blaming big corporations, it's also our responsibility, at this point everything counts, start being a responsible consumer, change your diet, buy to local farmers..., but do something!!!!!!!!!!
Anyone who has lived through 2020 knows how accurate the predictions of experts are (sarcasm alert).
Very accurate. The only problem I see is people ignoring experts until it's too late.
exactly and new Lockdown are on the horizon as well
Oh God! Only 8 years left! It's always 10 years away. Grass will be growing in our jaw bones and still the climate crisis will not have happened. The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past. It also warmed faster in the past.
"The Earth was warmer in the recent and distant past." NO, the Earth hasn't been this warm for ~125,000 years. The RWP and MWP were just regional events.
"It also warmed faster in the past." The last time the Earth warmed this rapidly, ~95% of marine life died off as did 70% of life on land, including everything over 90 pounds. So yeah, if you want to trigger a mass extinction event, rapid and sustained man-made global warming, ocean acidification and ocean de-oxygenation would definitely accomplish that.
@@karlwheatley1244 It was warmer during the Medieval (Elbert, 2013, 2.9°C above present), Roman (Margaritelli, 2020), 2°C above present, also Wang et al, 2013, showing the change was at least hemispheric, and Minoan Warm Periods (Lécuyer, 2018, 4°C above present, links Mediterranean to Greenland Ice so at least hemispheric). It was certainly warmer during the Holocene Climatic Optimum, so during our current interglacial. If you want a citation, try Quaternary Research Volume 53, Issue 3, May 2000, Pages 302-311. This makes the point that it was upto 7°C warmer on the shores of the Arctic during that time, with trees growing on the shores of the ocean (which would have been ice free in the summer - so don't worry about an ice-free Arctic), far to the north of the current treeline.
@karlwheatley1244 The big problem for you doomists is peak interglacial warmth is not now but around 8,000 years ago. Proxies show a downward trend to the present day but with an interruption for the Medieval Warm Period (that doomists aren't allowed to believe in) followed by a decent into the The Little Ice Age (which doomists think also didn't exist), and a very slight recovery to the present day still below MWP though. Now I know what you're going to say about the supposed rapid warming over the last century but that's not a fair comparison. That's instrumental, with annual instrumental measurements compared with proxy data, whose the resolution is 200 years. If we smooth out the current data over the last two centuries you'd be lucky to see ½ degree per century. Your rapid warming disappears, and a very large number of bicentennial periods over the last 16,500 years warm at a faster rate (than 0.5°C/century). And let's not forget the Dansgaard-Oeschger events. The Dansgaard-Oeschger events were global (Dima et al, 2018). One about 11,500 years ago, averaged annual temperatures on the Greenland ice sheet increased by around 8°C over 40 years, in three steps of five years, but a 5 °C change over 30-40 years is more common for these events. So shall we say a rate of change about 20°C per century. If that happened now you'd be foaming at the mouth, but it's all within the range of natural events.
@karlwheatley1244 As regards ocean acidification, it is estimated that the ocean’s global mean surface pH may have declined (i.e., become less alkaline and thus more “acidic”) by -0.07 to -0.08 in the last 200 years - from pH8.12 during pre-industrial times to 8.04 to 8.05 today (Wei et al, 2015). N.B. The decline in pH occurred before 1930.
However, and very importantly when you look the data after CO2 emissions began rising precipitously in the 1930s, the oceans have become less “acidic”!!!
By way of comparison, from one season to the next, or over the course of less than 6 months, pH levels naturally change by ±0.15 pH units, or twice the overall rate of the last 200 years. On a per-decade scale, the changes are even more pronounced. Oceanic pH values naturally fluctuate up and down by up to 0.6 U within a span of a decade, with an overall range between 7.66 and 8.40. This decadal rate of pH change is larger than the overall 200-year span (0.07-0.08) by a factor of 8. Indeed the daily noted maximum pH range of 0.7 (Santos et al. 2011) is far greater than the overall change predicted between now and the end of the century.
@@OldScientist Thanks for your reply. "Proxies show a downward trend to the present day but with an interruption for the Medieval Warm Period (that doomists aren't allowed to believe in) followed by a decent into the The Little Ice Age (which doomists think also didn't exist), and a very slight recovery to the present day still below MWP though." No, we're ~.9 degrees warmer on average GLOBALLY than during the MWP, and our emissions are warming the planet 10-20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age.
"If we smooth out the current data over the last two centuries you'd be lucky to see ½ degree per century." That would be unscientific fudging of the data--including 140 years in which we weren't burning CO2 at anything close to current rates. More than half the human emissions ever happened in just the last 35 years--and that has accelerated the rate of global warming and the rate of global sea level rise has also accelerated.
"The Dansgaard-Oeschger events were global (Dima et al, 2018). One about 11,500 years ago, averaged annual temperatures on the Greenland ice sheet increased by around 8°C over 40 years, in three steps of five years, but a 5 °C change over 30-40 years is more common for these events.": A couple of points: First, Greenland is just around .4 percent of the surface of the Earth, so you don't get to pretend the whole planet had the same amount of warming. The D-O events were globally synchronous events in that there was SOME type of climate disruption triggered elsewhere, NOT that everywhere had just as much warming at the same time. As a paper in PNAS reported six weeks ago...
"Furthermore, we identify a decreasing trend in the amplitude of DO transitions with increasing distances from the North Atlantic region. This provides quantitative observational evidence for previous suggestions of the North Atlantic region being the focal point for these archetypes of past abrupt climate changes."
Furthermore, DO were cyclical disruptions with the most dramatic effects in the North Atlantic, but our emissions will keep making the whole planet warmer and warmer, and warmer and warmer until we stop our emissions.
Take care.
Make this trending everyone
Amazingly well said!
Wake up Humans!
No, I mean really awaken...
only mass Self-realization can save Us now
See with 20/20 in 2020!
@Marcos Filho The old "cut off your nose to spite your face trick" eh?
Greedy people will still be greedy after you burn the rain-forests,
but probably not so much after self-awareness.
(Just My experience-based opinion though and I do see Your point).
@Marcos Filho if you believe that burning the forests is the solution you are the embodiment of the expression "A little knowledge is a dangerous thing".
You don't seem to understand how important preserving the forests are to supporting life on Earth
You don't understand greed either.
Greedy people will not stop being greedy if you burn the forest.
Greed is insatiable.
Greed wants it all!
Wake up and take responsibility for your words, stop saying such ridiculous things that they sound like trolling, because whether you are trolling or not, you may influence the thinking of people even more stupid than you, to actually burn the forests, which would be disastrous and move Us further away from the solution of the protection and preservation of the biospheres that support healthy air and water, healthy plants animals and people, and all life on Our Planet.
🌍🌎🌏
Didn't we already pass some kind of threshold with CO2 emissions?...I thought we had 10 years, 10 years ago...When was the first Earth Day?....I feel like I've been hearing the same thing since Rachel Carson's Silent Spring....
Er, you do realise that the last IPCC report (2021) confirmed we have now triggered irreversible changes? And that the big one, the Doomsday Glacier, hangs by a thread. We thought we had ten years. And it turns out that was about right. I feel like the scientist at the end of Don't Look Up.
I’m so glad I did my part a bought some Al Gores LED lightbulbs, climate change is over.
How could this not be seen by more people...
1:57 watching this in 2029
Just shock me
How he knew about
2022-25 world shakeups
...
"1 month ago"
For the last 40 years I've been hearing people say, "it's not too late, we can make it if we just change our ways now". We never changed our ways. Around 30 years ago, based on the ecological trends of the day, I modelled WWIII starting in the late 2020's and I see no reason to change that estimate now. It's too late people it's far, far too late. So take care of yourself and your family as best you can. We're all in this alone.
a turn towards sustainability IS happening though. What makes you believe it's too late? Also how did you set up the model for the wwIII prediction?
@@frederikandersen8402 he hasn't got proof, he's making out he's tougher than he truly is.
The Club of Rome made predictions about business as usual in the 70's leading to collapse of civilization in the late 2020's to 2030's, and it looks like we are on track.
Do not get excited. It is not true. They only want you to be afraid, to get angry with those, who live they normal life, to go out and demonstrate, to get in conflict...but this is all lie. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
@@carriefisher2644 Only if too many give up. Stop watching commercial tv news, who are funded by Oil Corp's etc. Some of us must be climate activists. Since I got too hurt to work long ago, I've done politics and climate activism. Help those who do now.
I can't believe this has so less views... Man this must be known by every person on earth, we need a change ASAP
So this is why the virus and vaccines are so important.
Powerful video, hope more people 'wake up' and start to incorporate new changes into their life.
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
I have learned about an Oxford study, which found out, that the best single one thing everybody can do is to lead a plant based lifestyle.
You mean become a vegetable!!?
People think gas costs a lot now? Just wait til we run out of oil. Estimates vary from 2050 to 2100
"We need to find a safe corridor for humanity". Three years later we're no closer to finding it. Now what?
"This next decade will be a great turning point for humanity, as this great environmental change begins to alter the face of the world, as humanity faces a growing presence in the world from those beyond who would seek to use this world for their own purposes. They are not here to destroy you but to use you, seeing you as part of the resource of the world.
Feeling this great turning point, some people will think it is the end-it is the end of humanity, it is the end of time, or it is the end of human civilization. And some people think it is a glorious beginning, a great new age for humanity of enlightenment and unity, of spirituality.
But who can face the reality with the courage and the power of Knowledge that God has placed within each person? Yet this Knowledge is unknown in the world, except by a few.
So they [people] fail to respond. They fail to prepare. They fail to recognize the growing signs of the world. They remain either oppressed in their nations where there is poverty or religious or political oppression, or they remain subsumed in their own personal preoccupations and desires and difficulties, heedless, unaware that their lives are about to change beyond their reckoning."
A quote from an upcoming free online book by Marshall Vian Summers, titled *The New Way Forward for Humanity* - a part of a greater set of teachings called *The New Message from God* which you can explore in depth at *NewMessage.org*
Rabble! RABBLE RABBLE! RABBLE😝. Suggestion for simple solution. Have the ones who can do something, live in the areas where affect is needed. Survivor style. Have a matched economical situation to the average family income of that area. And have the community absorb them and not discriminate or ostracized, but to interact with one another in a communal way. Hear the stories of thosr affected and learn to have more of a developed compassion and understanding of a situation. Otherwise. Those who have, will. And those who want, will as well. Be the ones who do. Do make an effort for better. Do help who you can, when you can. Do choose a smile instead of being a troll.
Do be better than you think you should be. Always try to make things better.
yeah man, you're right
Wise comment!
extraordinary message with Super extraordinary animation.
Everyone needs to see this. Learn it. Live it. It is a revolution - Sustainability Revolution.
Thank you for this great video! Let's stick together and let us do whatever we can to solve the climate crisis. Stop talking, let's do it!
Do not get excited. It is all wrong. No such problem. People have been misled to think that the carbon dioxide gas emitted when fossil fuels are burned, is a “pollutant. Nothing could be further from the truth. CO2 is really the gas of life. Without CO2 plants and all other life on Earth would die. They only want you to give up quality life, your properties and all. Global leaders want the earth for themselves and you to be dead or if not, to work for them. Wake up!
I'm optimistic that we can change things for the better, thank you!
Oh look another world economic forum member promoting the 2030 agenda where they say you will own nothing and be happy wake up people!
Созидательный формат общества решит эту проблему! Поддержим мировой проект построения Созидательного общества, люди!!!
The Global Project is absolutely deadly for humanityt
The Arctic minimum summer sea ice trend is zero for the past 17 years. In the past few years it was almost as high as 1995. The probability that this could be due to chance has now dropped to 10% (after Swart et al calculations, 2015). If the hiatus continues until 2027, it will become statistically significant (p
This was amazing ❤️ Loved it
Until the power dynamics between governments and its people are stopped, no one is going to fix anything because no one is going to change for the bullies we live under. We live in a co-dependent world and we're all suffering greatly from its dysfunctional dynamics. The tragic thing is that the planet and its inhabitants are suffering for it . . .
So many people have lost hope that we now also face population collapse.
Change, or be changed, that is the choice we face
Propaganda
finnaly,,yes,LIE
Sorry you said New York will stand in water by 1999. Also said there will be no oil by 2020. Also said there will be no water on the continent. Why fear mongering?
Great video
UN: the single most powerful thing people can do is to go vegan.
Sensational video: the shock of my career, we have the technological answers, I fear, save our children.
Countries will not do the right thing in time. Is up to us. Food: vegan. Clothing: second hand / sustainable sources. Transports: public transports, buy green energy vehicles.
You want change, change your actions.
So clear! So eloquent! So needed!
The world's population has grown explosively in the last 150 years, which is the reason for the environmental problems we now see. We must do something about it...
HI IM FROM INDIA
@Marcos Filho sir , whole economy is besed on rich this is not the fault of rich this the fault of government
Another computer model speculation?
Man made global warming is a fact.
In the 70's the ferns and other plants under the redwoods were above my waist, but was starting to thin out by the 80's. By the 90's there were around half as many ferns and plants on the forest floor. Now the forest floor of the redwood park I grew up a few blocks away from is nothing but sticks and dirt, with a few plants here and there. In the 70's it used to rain here on average 28 days during the summer months alone. Now we are lucky to get that much rain in the entire year.
Since they started keeping track in 1930, 17 of California's 20 biggest fires happened in the last 20 years. That was before this year. I now live a few miles away from what used to be California's largest fire ever at over 400,000 acres. But there is a fire burning about 60 miles north of me that was over 1 million acres now.
4,000,000 acres have burned in California this year alone, many people have lost their homes (some lost everything), some even lost their lives. But because we are all lefties who disagree with their precious gop, the trumpers don't care at all. All they care about is "owning the libs."
Well, I have some interesting news for trumpers: Most of the people who live in this county are republicans, but because of misinformed people like them causing so much destruction by trusting trump and people like him, many of them are voting for Biden now.
It wouldn't even matter to any group other than trumpers what sort of people lived here though. But trumpers want to murder (or at the very least: let die) anyone who disagrees with their hatred, refusal to accept responsibility for the freedom of others, and their murderous intentions.
climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/
nsidc.org/cryosphere/quickfacts/icesheets.html
www.antarcticglaciers.org/2018/06/mass-balance-antarctic-ice-sheet-1992-2017/
www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/ice-sheet/
phys.org/news/2018-12-greenland-ice-sheet-centuries.html
www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/06/after-decades-of-ice-loss-antarctica-is-now-hemorrhaging-mass/562748/
www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2018/06/13/antarctic-ice-loss-has-tripled-in-a-decade-if-that-continues-we-are-in-serious-trouble/?.513e4487ea53
www.npr.org/2018/06/13/619543532/antarctica-has-lost-more-than-3-trillion-tons-of-ice-in-25-years
www.antarctica.gov.au/about-antarctica/environment/climate-change/ice-sheets-and-sea-level-rise
www.nytimes.com/2018/06/13/climate/antarctica-ice-melting-faster.html
Here are just a couple more of the millions of articles that support this:
www.nationalgeographic.com/environment/global-warming/global-warming-real/
climate.nasa.gov/evidence/
blueprint.ucla.edu/feature/climate-change-is-real/
www.eartheclipse.com/climate-change/is-climate-change-real.html
www.edf.org/climate/how-climate-change-plunders-planet/climate-facts
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_consensus_on_climate_change
Do you trumpers care nothing even for the future of your own children? Is owning the libs really all that you care about?
@Aylbdr Madison Look at all the failed predictions based on the climate models and ridiculous claims made by activists and scientist activists.
NASA Goddard Institute (GISS) and NOAA constantly adjust the same temperature data to produce "bogus" warming graphs. There is doubt about the validity of some of these adjustments. czcams.com/video/xMc1o2tUBds/video.html
See why climate alarmism is ridiculous:
czcams.com/video/Gh-DNNIUjKU/video.html
It's not true that 97% of scientists agree with this climate alarmism. czcams.com/video/ewJ6TI8ccAw/video.html
Dr Chris Landsea hurricane researcher at NOAA resigned from the IPCC saying "I personally cannot in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound".
The Plenary Panel of political appointees at the head of the IPCC approves the outline of the IPCC report before the scientific authors are selected. The Summary for Policymakers is also written by them. Any scientific studies not consistent with the Summary are removed from the IPCC report.
Or so says Climatologist Dr Richard Keen who seems to agree with Tony Heller as regards surface temperature adjustments. The video is from 2015.
czcams.com/video/Gmc5w2I-FCA/video.html
Dr Peter Ridd was sacked for telling the truth that the Great Barrier Reef was in excellent health, climatechangedispatch.com/climate-skeptic-professor-fired-for-telling-truth-great-barrier-reef/
Reports of GBR death have been greatly exaggerated. czcams.com/video/U2HjsF6w_Q8/video.html&feature=emb_logo
See this example of climate propaganda which cherry-picks start and end dates to produce misleading graphs when trying to influence journalists and policy makers. czcams.com/video/8455KEDitpU/video.html
As an ordinary person am I expected to believe the extreme alarmism from Extinction Rebellion & others who say climate trends are dangerous, and we have 12 years to save the earth before tipping points lead us to extinction.
"We're saved. More than 12 years, here's why". It was a single reference in an IPCC SR15 Report taken out of context, which said this is where we would like to be in 12 years time.
czcams.com/video/hgiEia7sv4U/video.html
Even today scientific reports are produced giving exaggerated outcomes based on the thoroughly discredited RCP8.5 "business as usual" climate model, but these outcomes most scientists don't believe will ever happen. czcams.com/video/6SOEs0LzZCg/video.html
If you have time, why not read What the Climate Wars did to Science by Matt Ridley
www.rationaloptimist.com/blog/wha