I have to pause this video tell you that you have the best car review style I've ever seen. It's so cinematic like, that it sort makes me want to grab some popcorn and play this CZcams video off the big screen and enjoy. Keep up the good work!
I just purchased a grand touring 2016, and I am in love. It isn't supremely powerful, but is still enough. more then enough. and the interior and exterior make you feel special. Love this car.
@@youngmaster504 I have a 2014 6 that hasnt had a single issue - 103k on the ODO. The interior is a bit noisy and the ride is a little bumpy, but no other complaints.
@@mog8776 thank you for the reply. I went ahead and purchased a used one a couple months back and so far no mechanical issues. Correct seats could be more comfortable and ride more smoother but to take me from point A to point B, works perfectly
@@youngmaster504 Glad you're enjoying it! There is a TSB on the rear caliper - something about it rusting out due to water entering the caliper. I'm not sure if your car has it, but you should get it checked either way.
So I've owned the iGT (with tech package) for over a year now. Here are my thoughts/observations: Overall the 6 continues to grow on me. I've been a Mazda guy for over 25 years and have owned 3 Proteges, 2 Mazda 3's (one was 2008 Mazdaspeed), a Mazda 5, 2010 Mazda 6sGT with the 3.7 liter V6 and a 2010 Mazda CX9 GT. I also took a detour with a 2013 VW Golf R which, while fun, wasn't as balanced as anything Mazda. Other Honda's and Toyota's I owned are but a footnote. The only memorable amongst them was my 86 MR2; from a time when Toyota knew what uncomplicated fun looked like. The new Skyactiv designs are by far the best of the litter. Previous Mazdas were fun yet compromised cars- IMO mostly stemming from the Ford relationship and parts bin engineering. By comparison my Ford Edge-based CX9 feels old with a cheap interior from a materials and construction POV (still, Mazda's engineers managed to tune this chassis in a way that makes it a fun drive). It's also been dead nuts reliable. This new Mazda 6 is a huge departure from the Ford years and if you study Mazda's history and car philosophy is less about straight-line power and more about BALANCE. As SG mentions in his reviews, Mazda has really stepped up their interior design and the more I live with the 6 the more I appreciate the well-thought-out and attractive cockpit. After a year of New England weather and roads the car is rattle and buzz free. The infotainment system is also quite good; I don't care that it doesn't support Carplay- yet. I also find the UI intuitive and usable. Sure the screen resolution is a bit on the low side, but the bones of the system are quite good IMO. Vehicle dynamics are as SG states- steering and chassis tuning are spot on and even better once you dump the factory Dunlops for better tires. As part of my sales deal I upgraded to Michelin Pilot AS/3's. The Michelins fixed the road noise issue and made a noticible improvement to ride and handling. As a daily driver this car is a joy to navigate to work after dropping the kids at school and confirms to me that Mazda's "jinba ittai" ("horse and rider" design philosophy) isn't empty marketing hyperbole. Now when I first test drove the 6 the engine was my biggest concern. Such a large car and small engine didn't compute from an enthusiats POV. But after a year I'm finding that this engine is quite good, with plenty of power to have fun for enthusiats who don't have a race track nearby. I think the major difference is that it takes time for the ECU to learn the driver. Reading several articles on the Skyactiv 2.5 reveals that it has pretty extensive engine managment as well as stout build with forged components. And after a year of "learning" has done a good job complementing my driving style. I do think this car is much better when you (as SG indicates) use sport and manual mode together and wind the engine out. Like other Mazdas I've owned (save the MS3 which always acted like a hungry dog pulling at the chain) the 6 has a very Jeckyll and Hyde personality. You can either leave it in Normal and get excellent efficiency (I've seen close to 40mpg consistently on the highway) and comfort. Or let a bit of Hyde out by selecting sport and using the paddles to keep the engine at a boil. The most fun is twisty roads in 2nd or third gear between 3 and 5K rpm. Another observation... I think the problem with reviewing a press car is the ECU's lack of learning one particular driver's habits over the relatively short time the reviewer has with the car. This is also the rub when you test drive a brand new car. This one detail maybe the difference between loving or dicounting a car like the 6. I'm not saying the 6 is a race car- it isn't. But over the year I have defintely found it to be an extremely well-engineered and BALANCED package that offers enthusiats an option over appliance autos. FYI, to those who wonder if there are "tunes" for the Skyactiv. I'm considering a tune from Orange Virus to improve the low RPM response and leverage better performance via high octane rather than the 87 tune from the factory. Part of me wonders why Mazda just doesn't offer a Premium fuel tune like they do on the CX-9 so people have a choice. As I commented on SG's CX9 review, I don't think dropping the new Skyactiv turbo into the front wheel drive 6 would be a good thing. Having owned an MS3, I know how bad torque steer can be. Also take a look at SG's review of the 2016 Kia Optima and see what too much power to the front wheels can do. Not my cup of tea. Burn-outs are best on RWD. :-) FWIW
I drove a 2017 Mazda 6 I Touring and let me tell you coming from a Pontiac G8 the Mazda was plenty fast for my liking all while getting great gas mileage and excellent handling. I honestly really want one.
Very well said ocramidaizi. I agree word for word with you and I am glad you took the time to write out the post. It’s promising to see someone using their head when picking a car and not just chasing horsepower. I just bought a Mazda 3 for my daily driver and love the thing. It really is a great driving enthusiasts daily driver. The weekends are reserved for my MK3 1987 Toyota Supra. :-)
I have an sT 2016 I bought used. I've been trying to learn a lot more about how the engine computer works and thinks because it's something I notice a lot. Other than the owner's manual (which doesn't mention much) do you have any recommended reading materials??
The still shots you posted in the beginning of the video helped me decide on buying a used 2016 Reflex blue mica AT Touring plus Mazda6. Thanks for the images in varying lighting.
Just got a 2016 Mazda 6 for my wife. This guys hits all points perfectly. The exterior is awesome! The car handles great. The stock Dunlop tires make some noise but those will be replaced with Michelins. The car could use more power but it definitely has more torque than the Fusion (N/A 4cyl) and the Chrysler 200. Over all it will a great family car for my wife.
You're either full of geese excrement or have never seen another car review "RC". The review should have been about the disconnect between marketing the 6 as a performance/driver's car and its anemic power-train. What drives a car company to put motorcycle engines into the engine bays of passenger cars? What drives a manufacturer to offer only a 4 banger in the engine bay of its two ton SUV? The answer is government regulation, leftists who believe in the tooth fairy and global warming (or is it Climate Change/Difference?), and a misguided, complacent corporate vision of product and their target market. Why do you think Mazda sales have fallen off so dramatically? Let me give you a clue.....maybe their product isn't meeting their market's wants/needs, do you think? You must work for Mazda or that global warming, anti-internal combustion engine nut, John Davis and his PBS excuse for a car magazine, Motorweek.
johnmaer Hmmm, it's a car review not a marketing lesson. The first thing that he mentioned when he got behind the wheel was the acceleration and how the car is made for fuel efficiency. He mentions the lack of a better engine option. The way I look at is that if you think it's underpowered or doesn't have options that meet your needs then move on to what quenches your need to get from zero to sixty two or three seconds faster. You have a valid point if you are a long time Mazda guy that enjoyed the V6 models of past, I too have owned one and it was fun to drive. More and more people want better MPGs and feel that these types of "underpowered" vehicles is worth the trade off. Everyone's driving situation is different. I don't give a shit if if their sales have been dropping, that's their problem not mine. Oh so by the way the reason I liked this review was the production and the way he presented it. The audio quality was amazing for a review. Listening to it in my headphones it sounds like it was all done in a studio and the background music was at a good volume. Have a nice day guy
The purpose of my commentary or observations is to take issue with the reviewer in not informing his readership or viewership of the folly in what this car company is dishing out, nothing more and nothing less. Yes, I am a Mazda guy and feel I have an informed viewpoint. There is not one mention of the incongruity in Mazda's zoom-zoom brand reputation (driver's car) and the actual limited capabilities of its offerings. Most of the reviewers cannot give an honest review because they are bought-and-sold, they won't get cars to review if they are too candid in their appraisals....it is up to us....the viewing public and product owners to react and set the record straight, when called for....so respectfully, can't dismiss the fact Mazda is selling and marketing the 6 as a high-end driver's car when it's little more than a dolled-up econo-box because of the anemic, did I also say loud 4-banger engine. It is with huge disappointment that I have to use Y-T as the place to vent....I've already vented to my local Mazda dealers and despite the fact I've owned several of their products and test driven all others, they've never asked for my owner's opinion. All I can do is boycott the product and urge others to do so as well....until they get it right and re-think their stupid decision to rely on underpowered engines. Have a good day.
It says Mazda 6 review "slow and steady" so why would one assumed that this car hauls ass he did say that the only option was the 4 cylinder. I would like to think that most people are smart enough to figure out if they were interested enough in the car based of his review to determine if they would want to go look at the car in person based off the video. For people that want a V6 well not this year. Hey, why don't you make a CZcams video about your issues and concerns
The animations turn your channel into something totally different than ANY car reviewer I’ve ever watched. Turns it into such a learning experience on a much deeper, less superficial level. Car jargon for people who aren’t CAR people can be off putting but using jargon with an explanation adds so much depth
I originally got here looking through multiple reviews for the Mazda6 and yours is not only in-depth but refreshingly unbiased. Ended up watching multiple vids of yours and still on the fence between the Mazda6, Optima, or Subaru WRX. Subscribed.
When you compare the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times on the base competition in this class, the Mazda 6 is at or near the top, yet reviewers often dog the acceleration. Why? I think it's because the Mazda is so good looking that people think it should run like a Mustang GT. People praise the base level Camry yet it's a second slower to 60 than the 6. The transmission on the 6 is silky smooth. Google Mazda 6 and Altima transmissions and see what you find. One of them has endless complaints of failure, the other doesn't. Yet??? reviewers love the Altima. I think there is a double standard out there among the "experts". Thanks for the review.
+Zayn's_the_Mane I believe he is talking about the Altima. Although, I don't want to put words in his mouth. I would go for it man, the transmission is so good in these cars.
Leejack 27 Altima transmission has endless failures? Stop making shit up...if thats the case Mazda 6 wouldve been selling more than Altima and would have a better resale value. Smh.
That's not true at all. Some people have different preferences. Just because a car make/model sells less than a Camry doesn't make said car inferior to the Camry. We have a lot of people in this country who would just like to drive a boring/vanilla car. That's fine. I am not one of them. Mazda has won MANY awards over the years for a reason. Sure, they aren't for everyone... so don't drive one if you don't want to. Doesn't diminish the value of the car.
I love the Mazda6 so much! My first car was a Mazda 626 1996 with 90hp and never I had problems! My Mazda 626 is standing in my garage! Now I'm 21 years old and buy a 2016 Mazda6! Forever Mazda!!!
Just got the mazda6 and your review is ABSOLUTELY ON POINT!! Its a great car and i value functionality over performance. together with a beautiful design, inside and out, i love it..Your review helped me decide and is the closest one to how i feel about the car, before and after i bought it...Thank you!!!
+savagegeese i got the sonic silver. i got the touring trim and added the package with the sunroof and bose sound system. i figured that's what i missed most in the GT trim. i was looking at accord, camry and fusion in this segment and the cx5 too(off segment but features amd price was interesting)..But it was always the mazda6 for me!
Same always the Mazda 6 still have a 09 grand sport 2.5l naturally aspirated with 206k km on it its still an amazing vehicle no problems and it's a 10 year old car to this date car never broke down on me and mines in also fully loaded actually it's too fully loaded for a 09 if u ask me witch is wht alot of people tell me about my 6 for a 2009 model year. Lol
I only found this after watching all other major reviews. This is by far the best overview of them all. Thank you for an incredibly thorough review touching on the pieces that really matter. Excellent work.
I've been a Mazda fan for 3 years now. The speed3 was always my favorite but this year it has to be the 6. The craftsmanship they layered into the lines of this car is amazing. I can't believe the price is that low. I want this car because it is ergonomically correct and still shines the brightest not only in its segment with the Accord and the camry but also with the lexus's. This is a way for Mazda to make its name if it hasn't already. Thank you for the review because I've seen this car a couple of times around town and I'm just astonished.
Your reviews are hilarious and very slick. Your sense of humour is very Australian. I particularly like your review of the 3 when you talk about dandruff and psoriasis. Bloody brilliant Mate!
Great review. No bullshit. No sugar coating. You focus on what the car will be like to live with over the years. "Car of the year awards" are all well and good...a car may be great new, but what will it be like in 5, 10 or 20 years? Also, dry, sarcastic and hilarious! You should do stand up!
I don't know that I'd exactly call the 6 "slow" but I agree with your general impressions about the 2.5L combo with the automatic. I had the same setup in my 2014 Mazda 3s GT that was totalled a few weeks ago, and the transmission is definitely tuned for maximum economy. The only way to get spirited performance out of the car was to put it in Sport mode, which is MUCH more aggressive about holding gears and downshifting, or go "M" mode and do the shifting myself. That having been said, if I did that, the 3 would haul the mail, remembering that it was a compact-segment car and not really aimed to be a serious performance car. Still, both the 3 and the 6 just scream out for Mazdaspeed versions. The interiors on both cars are so good and the basic chassis setups are so dead-on that it's criminal not to have at least one of those cars with a bootful of turbo or V6 power under your right foot and AWD putting it to the pavement. I just bought a 2016 6 Touring to replace my wrecked 3, so far I love it. The interior refresh is amazing, even on the "leatherette" seats in the Touring and minus some of the bells and whistles from the GT trim. I need to take it out on a serious mountain road jaunt soon and see how it handles things. The 3 was a complete blast, I expect the 6 to be a little less zippy because it's bigger, but it's also a lot more comfortable.
if you wanted power, why get exactly the same car as the mazda 3? if they put a v6 in the mazda 6, is going to become way more expensive and there are much cheaper options for the same power
Looks like a year since you posted your review. I currently own a 2006 3 and wanting to replace it. On the fence about getting a new 3 or a new 6, with 2.5 and manual in either choice. I have never driven a 6 and have not driven the new 3 either. Just curious what your thoughts would be after a year owning the 6. I have enjoyed my 3 and like driving it still and it has the 2.0 engine with manual transmission.
After driving one I learned to love the steering & handling; this is such a tossable car. The feature content is great as well & the Premium tester feels like it is punching in a class above (e.g. Acura & Buick). The biggest complaint I have really is the utter lack of power, something of a common trait on all current Mazda products as of late (after the RX-8 & Speed 3 got axed). The Mazda 6 especially would benefit from the 2.5 turbo from the CX-9. It is a real shame Mazda doesn't sell more of these 6 as Accords, Camrys & Fusion sells.
I had M6 2,5l for test drive in 2015 and I absolutely loved the design, interior, handling...and the reason I didnt buy it was it really feels VERY sluggish for 192HP. It felt like it takes forever to get to speed. I hope M6 will come with 2,5T to my dealer.
I was pretty happy in my 2015 CX-5 but I was missing the manual transmission I had in my 2010 Mazda 3. I happened to look at the 2016 mazda 6 interior and I was sold. I traded my myCX-5 for a touring 6MT Mazda6. If I had a moonroof it would be perfect car.
2 weeks ago, my 2016 Mazda 6 got killed off by the classic novice high school/college driver who sucked at left turn yielding from the opposite direction. Literally just hit 195k miles on what was supposed to be the drive back home from a local restaurant. 5 years that car has been rock solid. My only complaints are primarily related to the low profile tires… a trend that REALLY needs to die out first chance… the roads appear to be getting worse in certain areas and the last thing average motorists need is no sidewalk protection if/when they run something over. Just oil, routine maintenance, and suspension here & there.
Really hate that low profile tire/big ass rim trend as well. You are even forced to get bigger rims when you spec cars with higher trims these days. Such a retarded trend. And guess what, another crappy trend these days is the lack of any sort of spare tire. Good combination.
The roads are absolutely awful in most places now. I can totally see why people get 4 runners because the roads will tear up the suspension on a regular car. I feel your pain about your car being totaled, I had a 99 accord with 145k that was absolutely perfect we used to ponder what the old owner used to car for because of how clean it was even underneath there wasn’t a spot or rust on it. Then on my birthday some idiot In a Range Rover rear ended me and took off. I still kept the car in my back yard for months I couldn’t part with it but In the end I did. People forget half the battle of getting high miles out of your car is not only maintenance but watching out for idiot drivers.
@@thetechlibrarian some dumbass hit us from behind once while we were waiting on red light.. in a broad daylight. You really need to be always defensive as long as driving licence is this easy to get.
The two problems he pointed out about this car do not apply to me at 6'7" 165 lbs. I drove one and I am far enough back for the arm rest to work, and in my short drive, the HUD did not get in my way at all, maybe because I was higher up that I was not looking through as much as over it.
Wow I just found this channel and it screams PASSION. There is no routine, both reviews I watched seem so different it is an adventure of its own. Great work, you seem to be also very knowledgeable about cars. You sir have earned a new subscriber and I wish you the best!
Hello guys, I also have a Mazda 6, I live in Europe and I have a 2.0 engine and 165 PS and I have no complaints. gearbox in manual mode and sport mode improves driving.
PS my car in no way feels slow. I just took 2 road trips and was bobbing and weaving, passing folk like a boss. It handles amazing in rain. I'm always first off the line at a light. I had to monitor myself to not maintain at 100mph and get pulled over. I get great gas mileage and I'm heavy footed. I forget to use sport mode though. What I really love is the handling and curves! I don't really see any reason to overpower the car. I prefer nimble. my friend drove it though and he felt it was twitchy but he was hopping too, lol. In regular point and go driving, you get bored because the car excels at hopping and zooming around slow folk. I was driving in NYC, which will let you know if your car has pep or not, and had no problems.
I got this mazda6 about 9 months ago influenced by your genuine review. I have loved it so much. except it's navigation which is very pain ful to use. wish Android Auto coming soon.love your channel. keep up your good work.
I love your reviews, they are excellent. I'm torn between a 2016 Mazda6 Touring and a 2016 Subaru Legacy 4cyl. Having driven both, which one would you pick?
Put a set of decent all seasons on the Mazda.. and Im sure it would do equally as well as the Subbie. If ya buy the Subbie.. stay with the Wagon. Otherwise dont bother. The Mazda could do a "sporting" attitude.. if ya drive like he.. or I do.
I drive a Mazdaspeed6 and got a new Mazda 6 for a rental for a road trip. I'm really impressed with the car as a whole, with the exception of the engine. The engine is decent in the Mazda 3, but in the 6 the engine is simply not adequate. I'm looking forward to Mazda updating engine choices (like the turbo 4 in the new CX-9) on this platform because I would snatch one of those up in a heartbeat.
+Kelly Adams I agree 100% I test drove it after seeing it in the Toronto auto show. Fabulous looking inside and out. When I test drove it, the car was GUTLESS !!! I told the salesman, the car has no "zoom zoom". There was alot of wind and road noise. Also I found it to be very expensive. In Canada the Mazda 6 GT is the same price as the Honda accord.
+Brian Tye In Canada, Mazda 6, GT starts at $34,725 (Automatic). The Honda Accord EXL-V6 sells for $33,270 (Automatic). The Honda has a V-6 ... get it !! There is a HUGE difference in cars when you get a V-6 with 278 HP for $ 1,455.00 LESS.. I drove the Mazda 6, it was a joke !!! At that time I had a Nissan Altima and it would blow the doors off the Mazda. With taxes the Mazda comes to $39,463.84 . No Way would I buy it.
I have a 2014 Mazda 3 and the HUD is one of my favorite features. Im short and its in a perfect spot to not interfere with the line of sight but right where you need it to be to not take your eyes off the road. And the 3 is only around 200lb lighter and feels super quick. I've done 0-60 in under 7s which to me isnt slow unless youre comparing it to a sports car. The new Mazda's have almost no downside.
This is based off seeing Hyundais and GMs HUD which does all of this and better without the need for the flip up plastic. I know plenty like the Mazda HUD but I mean they need a way to lower it at least. The 3 with even 2.0 feels faster than the Mazda6, basically this cars only major downfall.
savagegeese Well I traded a Veloster Turbo for my Mazda so I guess anything I drove after that car would feel great. Is the gearing for the Mazda6 the same as in the Mazda3?
Great review. Fair criticisms. This is my current car, but I have the Touring trim, so no iffy heads up display. I love it. My next car will be an updated 6 with the turbo.
I just bought a 2016 Mazda6 Grand Touring w/Tech Package and it is just as you explained here in your review. I was actually beginning to think that you wouldn't do a review on this car. I am happy that you did. It's very accurate and true. Great review and please please please PLEASE keep up the good... ahem, the GREAT work. Jason G.
or a 4 cyl turbo of some sort, this is the only thing holding me back from this car, it's such a nice looking car overall but only one engine option for North America is sadness.
+n1zm0 Yes, I'm agree, this car it's really good and looks cool but the engine it's not the best for this one, there are some 4cyl engines with 300+ hp or at least they should put a 4cyl engine with 240hp.
A V6 option would be nice, but it won't happen. Mazda, like Volvo, is now a 4-cylinder engine only car manufacturer for their high fuel efficiency. At the end of the day, 4-cylinders are fine for real world driving. I have a 4-cylinder '08 Accord with 190-hp, and it's more than sufficient for daily driving.
all the german car reviewers should take some ideas from this guy! i watched so many german reviews and no one of them was so detailed like this one.... keep it up guys! well done
Thank you for an inciteful and knowledgeable review of the 2016 Mazda 6. Your non biased delivery is very fluid and natural. You have really found your calling. You are able to do, what as a kid, I dreamed of doing. You can blame the August of 1984 issue of Motortrend magazine for that. Ever since buying that magazine, I have never been able to get enough of anything and everything car related. Just wish I had the finances to be able to indulge in the enthusiasm more. Looking forward to many more auto reviews from you. Keep up the good work.
I just test drove one. I did hear wind noise but not tire roar at 65+mph. I did not find this car sluggish at all. I am coming from a civic (cvt). ..I am very impressed with this car, hopefully the 2017 will address the wind noise with their claim of improved cabin noise reduction
Bought a 6 Touring a short time ago. On quality asphalt, you only hear the wind noise (and it is not an issue). On older concrete, the tire noise is noticeable, but coming from an older model Accord it doesn't bother me. The steering is excellent and the mileage has been great.
This is an awesome review! I bought my 2016 Mazda 6 Touring in November of 2015 and I've enjoyed it so far. I agree with a lot of what you said in this review, especially the engine and lack of power. The one thing that really irritates me and I know it's probably silly, I do not understand why Mazda put in blind spot monitors on the side mirrors but didn't invest in heated mirrors. My previous 2012 Chrysler 200 base model had heated mirrors and here in Oklahoma, we get a lot of frost in the winter and it blows my mind that they didn't include this. Aside from that though, I'm pretty happy with it!
+Jack C Hopefully a more powerful engine will be available for the 6 and the 3 within a few years. The new SkyActiv 2.5 turbo charged 4 cylinder (rumored to be around 300 HP) is coming to the redesigned CX-9 for 2016. I would think they would make that as an option for the 3 and the 6 to make more sales to those that want more power.
Jay Tsay I keep hearing rumors its coming to the 2017 6 and it would make sense if it does. Where did you hear it's confirmed? The 2016 6 just came out a few months ago. Do you have a link?
I work for a dealership and the last meeting Mazda held did give the go ahead to put the Turbo 4 which will be introduced in the CX-9 than the 6 the following year.
Jay Tsay I will take your word for it. Are you Mazda6club forum? Great info on there. I always look for updates there. Imagine the 2017 with a 2.5L Turbo, fixed armrest, push start button move down a little more, etc. It would be the perfect car for the average buyer.
No wonder Mazda is not currently using the “zoom- zoom” tagline anywhere in their advertising. Sadly, soon enough, their new motto will be: sip- sip...
You seemed to be more excited about the CX-5 than this 6. Is that a fair appraisal - is the CX-5 more fun to drive than the 6 or were liking the CX-5 in the context of it being a CUV (i.e. comparing it to its competitors RAV4, CRV, etc.)?
I liked the CX5 because it was best in segment mostly. Mazda 6 is also good for the same reasons but it is in a much more competitive segment with cars that have better engine options etc., so it was more difficult to appreciate. But if you don't care about the motor its on top of the list.
I drive mazda 6 wagon sport for two years now (43K km on the clock now) and in terms of fuel efficiency I'm very happy with it. I drive 50/50 city and highway and on one tank can do 750-850 km, which is just little less then I did in my previous turbodiesel car. True the car feels sometimes underpowered but by no means is slow. 0-100 km/h just over 8 seconds and doing 170 km/h with five adult people on board - not a problem (drive country side), could go much faster but I'd end up in prison in case caps stop me :) Excellent car for its price, only thing that annoys me is the navigation system (tom tom based) - its just hard to use and my car does not support android auto :(
What a fine line auto makers walk. They want to give good fuel economy; when they do , it is "why not a V-6", but when they up the game to a V-6, it is "well we expect better mileage". I suppose offering both as options would be the way to go.
Love the styling, best in class. Simple, yet elegant and exciting to look at. One thing though, my friends dad has one and interior materials are wearing out. 2015 vehicle! My 06 Camry still looks new, everything is intact. It's almost 10 years old! No other issues so far, though i would consider materials wearing out so soon quite an issue. Anyone else have this problem?
Jay Tsay he tried, Mazda will not cover it. Could be that he just had bad luck with the particular vehicle. Some companies that make quality cars sometimes slip too :)
u really make the best videos here ... yes ur right that they messed up with the center arm rest and the ariel atom windshield/hud display !!! i have the 2009 mazda 6 sport model - its a hidden hatchback thats got tons of space with a boyish (yet functional) spoiler for down force. the model's not available in the US but only in Europe, Asia and the gulf . theres an excellent spring loaded flip cover for 2 huge big gulp sized cup holders and an excellent center arm rest that has a button adjustment for forward and aft placement. wonder y they changed that for newer models? but you're spot on with steering feel (as awesome for EA), the long brake pedal that i dislike too (as preferred is a quick brake feel) and nothing happening unless TC is off . But the car corners neutral and wouldnt be far tp say its a FWD BMW ! Great review !!!
got a 2017 Touring and liking it so far. I assume this is the reflex blue model? how do you like that color? when i first saw it at dealer i thought it was good, but seems like the light makes the color look slightly different. i ended up going with jet black because i couldnt deal with this one. Interior really sold me on the car. the dunlops do suck though. Engine seems fine to me but im not looking for massive power. they just released the 2018 with 2.5 Turbo but your going to pay 3K more than touring. so if you are already in the 29k to 30k price range then go for it but i was looking for more mid-20s. i drove a couple other cars and just kept coming back to this one. exterior and interior were very good. engine adequate and gets good mpg. the only issue again is the tires. not a deal breaker though as you say.
Ugh....buy the lower trim model without the heads up display. Problem solved. And this is not a slow car. Don't be afraid to put your foot down to get around the factory economy programming
I routinely get 50+ mpg, upto 56 with a tailwind, going from 2500 to 2000 ft elevation over 11 miles with cruise set at 68 on the hwy portion which makes up 90% of the commute, and get 35-40 on the return.
"welcome... SHUT UP BIRDS" .. im dead
Carney Buor best intro ever
+Carney Buor "Shut up birds!" definitely makes it the best intro of all the reviews thus far! And the Irish Spring line just tied it all together.
Carney Buor i now understand why his name is Savage Geese lol
I've owned my 2016 Mazda 6 for a year now. It is a great car. I love the driving dynamics, fuel efficiency, and the looks.
diesel or petrol?
@@user-cn1em2qx6f petrol
@@user-cn1em2qx6fit runs with petrol. but i think you already know this 😂
I have to pause this video tell you that you have the best car review style I've ever seen. It's so cinematic like, that it sort makes me want to grab some popcorn and play this CZcams video off the big screen and enjoy. Keep up the good work!
that’s dam true !
And 4 years later it got even better. He is the best
I just purchased a grand touring 2016, and I am in love. It isn't supremely powerful, but is still enough. more then enough. and the interior and exterior make you feel special. Love this car.
Question is,
Does the arm rest & plastic hub thingy bother you aa much as it annoyed savage reese in this video?
Own the 2014 since it came out. Awesome car, no issues. Joy to drive every day.
Is it stilling holding up today no issues?
@@youngmaster504 czcams.com/video/5eJQ0VNksak/video.html
@@youngmaster504 I have a 2014 6 that hasnt had a single issue - 103k on the ODO. The interior is a bit noisy and the ride is a little bumpy, but no other complaints.
@@mog8776 thank you for the reply. I went ahead and purchased a used
one a couple months back and so far no mechanical issues. Correct seats could be more comfortable and ride more smoother but to take me from point A to point B, works perfectly
@@youngmaster504 Glad you're enjoying it! There is a TSB on the rear caliper - something about it rusting out due to water entering the caliper. I'm not sure if your car has it, but you should get it checked either way.
So I've owned the iGT (with tech package) for over a year now. Here are my thoughts/observations: Overall the 6 continues to grow on me. I've been a Mazda guy for over 25 years and have owned 3 Proteges, 2 Mazda 3's (one was 2008 Mazdaspeed), a Mazda 5, 2010 Mazda 6sGT with the 3.7 liter V6 and a 2010 Mazda CX9 GT. I also took a detour with a 2013 VW Golf R which, while fun, wasn't as balanced as anything Mazda. Other Honda's and Toyota's I owned are but a footnote. The only memorable amongst them was my 86 MR2; from a time when Toyota knew what uncomplicated fun looked like.
The new Skyactiv designs are by far the best of the litter. Previous Mazdas were fun yet compromised cars- IMO mostly stemming from the Ford relationship and parts bin engineering. By comparison my Ford Edge-based CX9 feels old with a cheap interior from a materials and construction POV (still, Mazda's engineers managed to tune this chassis in a way that makes it a fun drive). It's also been dead nuts reliable.
This new Mazda 6 is a huge departure from the Ford years and if you study Mazda's history and car philosophy is less about straight-line power and more about BALANCE. As SG mentions in his reviews, Mazda has really stepped up their interior design and the more I live with the 6 the more I appreciate the well-thought-out and attractive cockpit. After a year of New England weather and roads the car is rattle and buzz free.
The infotainment system is also quite good; I don't care that it doesn't support Carplay- yet. I also find the UI intuitive and usable. Sure the screen resolution is a bit on the low side, but the bones of the system are quite good IMO.
Vehicle dynamics are as SG states- steering and chassis tuning are spot on and even better once you dump the factory Dunlops for better tires. As part of my sales deal I upgraded to Michelin Pilot AS/3's. The Michelins fixed the road noise issue and made a noticible improvement to ride and handling. As a daily driver this car is a joy to navigate to work after dropping the kids at school and confirms to me that Mazda's "jinba ittai" ("horse and rider" design philosophy) isn't empty marketing hyperbole.
Now when I first test drove the 6 the engine was my biggest concern. Such a large car and small engine didn't compute from an enthusiats POV. But after a year I'm finding that this engine is quite good, with plenty of power to have fun for enthusiats who don't have a race track nearby. I think the major difference is that it takes time for the ECU to learn the driver. Reading several articles on the Skyactiv 2.5 reveals that it has pretty extensive engine managment as well as stout build with forged components. And after a year of "learning" has done a good job complementing my driving style. I do think this car is much better when you (as SG indicates) use sport and manual mode together and wind the engine out.
Like other Mazdas I've owned (save the MS3 which always acted like a hungry dog pulling at the chain) the 6 has a very Jeckyll and Hyde personality. You can either leave it in Normal and get excellent efficiency (I've seen close to 40mpg consistently on the highway) and comfort. Or let a bit of Hyde out by selecting sport and using the paddles to keep the engine at a boil. The most fun is twisty roads in 2nd or third gear between 3 and 5K rpm.
Another observation... I think the problem with reviewing a press car is the ECU's lack of learning one particular driver's habits over the relatively short time the reviewer has with the car. This is also the rub when you test drive a brand new car. This one detail maybe the difference between loving or dicounting a car like the 6. I'm not saying the 6 is a race car- it isn't. But over the year I have defintely found it to be an extremely well-engineered and BALANCED package that offers enthusiats an option over appliance autos.
FYI, to those who wonder if there are "tunes" for the Skyactiv. I'm considering a tune from Orange Virus to improve the low RPM response and leverage better performance via high octane rather than the 87 tune from the factory. Part of me wonders why Mazda just doesn't offer a Premium fuel tune like they do on the CX-9 so people have a choice.
As I commented on SG's CX9 review, I don't think dropping the new Skyactiv turbo into the front wheel drive 6 would be a good thing. Having owned an MS3, I know how bad torque steer can be. Also take a look at SG's review of the 2016 Kia Optima and see what too much power to the front wheels can do. Not my cup of tea. Burn-outs are best on RWD. :-)
FWIW
Delonte is my daddy I'll dumb it down for you: "I've owned a lot of Mazda brands, and I love the 6."
I drove a 2017 Mazda 6 I Touring and let me tell you coming from a Pontiac G8 the Mazda was plenty fast for my liking all while getting great gas mileage and excellent handling. I honestly really want one.
Very well said ocramidaizi. I agree word for word with you and I am glad you took the time to write out the post. It’s promising to see someone using their head when picking a car and not just chasing horsepower. I just bought a Mazda 3 for my daily driver and love the thing. It really is a great driving enthusiasts daily driver. The weekends are reserved for my MK3 1987 Toyota Supra. :-)
I have an sT 2016 I bought used. I've been trying to learn a lot more about how the engine computer works and thinks because it's something I notice a lot. Other than the owner's manual (which doesn't mention much) do you have any recommended reading materials??
Such a nice comment
I'm not surprised this video looks so good. I didn't know JJ Abrams knew this much about cars!
The still shots you posted in the beginning of the video helped me decide on buying a used 2016 Reflex blue mica AT Touring plus Mazda6.
Thanks for the images in varying lighting.
Just got a 2016 Mazda 6 for my wife. This guys hits all points perfectly. The exterior is awesome! The car handles great. The stock Dunlop tires make some noise but those will be replaced with Michelins. The car could use more power but it definitely has more torque than the Fusion (N/A 4cyl) and the Chrysler 200. Over all it will a great family car for my wife.
Did the Michelins end up helping with the tire noise? Any updates on the wife? Any divorce related issues? If yes did she elect to keep the car?
You really are an amazing reviewer. I wish you had 10 times more subscribers like you deserve
Thanks I could use maybe another 12 subscribers to be elite
+savagegeese you got me, great work keep it up!
+savagegeese
you just picked up one more.
You got me , brother .
This design imo looks much better then the newer madza 6 version
What an interesting guy. Just stumbled on this channel. I think I'll watch it more often.
Just bought a Mazda 6 yesterday and I love it. Can't stop thinking about driving it haha.
5 years later, how is she holding ?
Great vid! Well edited, sweet cinematography, and good info. Thank you!
Thank you!
This is the best car review I've ever seen. Well played young sir, well played.
You're either full of geese excrement or have never seen another car review "RC". The review should have been about the disconnect between marketing the 6 as a performance/driver's car and its anemic power-train. What drives a car company to put motorcycle engines into the engine bays of passenger cars? What drives a manufacturer to offer only a 4 banger in the engine bay of its two ton SUV? The answer is government regulation, leftists who believe in the tooth fairy and global warming (or is it Climate Change/Difference?), and a misguided, complacent corporate vision of product and their target market. Why do you think Mazda sales have fallen off so dramatically? Let me give you a clue.....maybe their product isn't meeting their market's wants/needs, do you think? You must work for Mazda or that global warming, anti-internal combustion engine nut, John Davis and his PBS excuse for a car magazine, Motorweek.
johnmaer Hmmm, it's a car review not a marketing lesson. The first thing that he mentioned when he got behind the wheel was the acceleration and how the car is made for fuel efficiency. He mentions the lack of a better engine option. The way I look at is that if you think it's underpowered or doesn't have options that meet your needs then move on to what quenches your need to get from zero to sixty two or three seconds faster. You have a valid point if you are a long time Mazda guy that enjoyed the V6 models of past, I too have owned one and it was fun to drive. More and more people want better MPGs and feel that these types of "underpowered" vehicles is worth the trade off. Everyone's driving situation is different. I don't give a shit if if their sales have been dropping, that's their problem not mine. Oh so by the way the reason I liked this review was the production and the way he presented it. The audio quality was amazing for a review. Listening to it in my headphones it sounds like it was all done in a studio and the background music was at a good volume. Have a nice day guy
The purpose of my commentary or observations is to take issue with the reviewer in not informing his readership or viewership of the folly in what this car company is dishing out, nothing more and nothing less. Yes, I am a Mazda guy and feel I have an informed viewpoint. There is not one mention of the incongruity in Mazda's zoom-zoom brand reputation (driver's car) and the actual limited capabilities of its offerings. Most of the reviewers cannot give an honest review because they are bought-and-sold, they won't get cars to review if they are too candid in their appraisals....it is up to us....the viewing public and product owners to react and set the record straight, when called for....so respectfully, can't dismiss the fact Mazda is selling and marketing the 6 as a high-end driver's car when it's little more than a dolled-up econo-box because of the anemic, did I also say loud 4-banger engine. It is with huge disappointment that I have to use Y-T as the place to vent....I've already vented to my local Mazda dealers and despite the fact I've owned several of their products and test driven all others, they've never asked for my owner's opinion. All I can do is boycott the product and urge others to do so as well....until they get it right and re-think their stupid decision to rely on underpowered engines. Have a good day.
It says Mazda 6 review "slow and steady" so why would one assumed that this car hauls ass he did say that the only option was the 4 cylinder. I would like to think that most people are smart enough to figure out if they were interested enough in the car based of his review to determine if they would want to go look at the car in person based off the video. For people that want a V6 well not this year. Hey, why don't you make a CZcams video about your issues and concerns
Robert Clinton qq
The animations turn your channel into something totally different than ANY car reviewer I’ve ever watched. Turns it into such a learning experience on a much deeper, less superficial level. Car jargon for people who aren’t CAR people can be off putting but using jargon with an explanation adds so much depth
Still take this over the Altima CVT!
I originally got here looking through multiple reviews for the Mazda6 and yours is not only in-depth but refreshingly unbiased. Ended up watching multiple vids of yours and still on the fence between the Mazda6, Optima, or Subaru WRX. Subscribed.
+Todd Payton Thanks glad the videos helped a bit, we try our best to be objective.
So what did you buy?
Optima 🤢
When you compare the 0-60 and 1/4 mile times on the base competition in this class, the Mazda 6 is at or near the top, yet reviewers often dog the acceleration. Why? I think it's because the Mazda is so good looking that people think it should run like a Mustang GT. People praise the base level Camry yet it's a second slower to 60 than the 6. The transmission on the 6 is silky smooth. Google Mazda 6 and Altima transmissions and see what you find. One of them has endless complaints of failure, the other doesn't. Yet??? reviewers love the Altima. I think there is a double standard out there among the "experts". Thanks for the review.
which has endless complaints if you don't mind me asking? I'm looking to buy the 6 this week.
+Zayn's_the_Mane I believe he is talking about the Altima. Although, I don't want to put words in his mouth. I would go for it man, the transmission is so good in these cars.
+Anton Zuykov That's not fair comparing the V6. He's talking about the other trims.
Leejack 27 Altima transmission has endless failures? Stop making shit up...if thats the case Mazda 6 wouldve been selling more than Altima and would have a better resale value. Smh.
That's not true at all. Some people have different preferences. Just because a car make/model sells less than a Camry doesn't make said car inferior to the Camry. We have a lot of people in this country who would just like to drive a boring/vanilla car. That's fine. I am not one of them.
Mazda has won MANY awards over the years for a reason. Sure, they aren't for everyone... so don't drive one if you don't want to. Doesn't diminish the value of the car.
One of the best Mazda 6 review i have seen to date.
I love the Mazda6 so much! My first car was a Mazda 626 1996 with 90hp and never I had problems! My Mazda 626 is standing in my garage! Now I'm 21 years old and buy a 2016 Mazda6! Forever Mazda!!!
Just got the mazda6 and your review is ABSOLUTELY ON POINT!! Its a great car and i value functionality over performance. together with a beautiful design, inside and out, i love it..Your review helped me decide and is the closest one to how i feel about the car, before and after i bought it...Thank you!!!
Thats good to hear, that we make some sense. What color did you get, what other cars did you look at?
+savagegeese i got the sonic silver. i got the touring trim and added the package with the sunroof and bose sound system. i figured that's what i missed most in the GT trim. i was looking at accord, camry and fusion in this segment and the cx5 too(off segment but features amd price was interesting)..But it was always the mazda6 for me!
Same always the Mazda 6 still have a 09 grand sport 2.5l naturally aspirated with 206k km on it its still an amazing vehicle no problems and it's a 10 year old car to this date car never broke down on me and mines in also fully loaded actually it's too fully loaded for a 09 if u ask me witch is wht alot of people tell me about my 6 for a 2009 model year. Lol
You deserve an Academy Award for your videos, they're really that good.
+Carlos Choy Thanks man, let me know what you think of the CX-5 uploading now.
I can't believe he says that it's not a luxury interior
He always seems sad
I only found this after watching all other major reviews. This is by far the best overview of them all. Thank you for an incredibly thorough review touching on the pieces that really matter. Excellent work.
+TheDecorama Thank you, glad you enjoys
Excellent video review. Wow lots of honest details.
I would love to see Mazda take everything to another level and create a new higher end line...
Ta-daaa, see the 2018 Mazda6 Atenza. I just got one and it's an amazing car.
You car reviews are like movies, so beautiful.
I just bought a 2016 Mazda 6 Itouring. I just found out it actually doesn’t have i e loop tech. Only the grand touring model has it.
I've been a Mazda fan for 3 years now. The speed3 was always my favorite but this year it has to be the 6. The craftsmanship they layered into the lines of this car is amazing. I can't believe the price is that low. I want this car because it is ergonomically correct and still shines the brightest not only in its segment with the Accord and the camry but also with the lexus's. This is a way for Mazda to make its name if it hasn't already. Thank you for the review because I've seen this car a couple of times around town and I'm just astonished.
No problem thanks for the comment about it. I hope Mazda is able to keep improving without tanking quality.
Greatest Cinematography I have ever seen on any car review!
Your reviews are hilarious and very slick. Your sense of humour is very Australian. I particularly like your review of the 3 when you talk about dandruff and psoriasis. Bloody brilliant Mate!
Great review. No bullshit. No sugar coating. You focus on what the car will be like to live with over the years. "Car of the year awards" are all well and good...a car may be great new, but what will it be like in 5, 10 or 20 years? Also, dry, sarcastic and hilarious! You should do stand up!
I don't know that I'd exactly call the 6 "slow" but I agree with your general impressions about the 2.5L combo with the automatic. I had the same setup in my 2014 Mazda 3s GT that was totalled a few weeks ago, and the transmission is definitely tuned for maximum economy. The only way to get spirited performance out of the car was to put it in Sport mode, which is MUCH more aggressive about holding gears and downshifting, or go "M" mode and do the shifting myself. That having been said, if I did that, the 3 would haul the mail, remembering that it was a compact-segment car and not really aimed to be a serious performance car. Still, both the 3 and the 6 just scream out for Mazdaspeed versions. The interiors on both cars are so good and the basic chassis setups are so dead-on that it's criminal not to have at least one of those cars with a bootful of turbo or V6 power under your right foot and AWD putting it to the pavement.
I just bought a 2016 6 Touring to replace my wrecked 3, so far I love it. The interior refresh is amazing, even on the "leatherette" seats in the Touring and minus some of the bells and whistles from the GT trim. I need to take it out on a serious mountain road jaunt soon and see how it handles things. The 3 was a complete blast, I expect the 6 to be a little less zippy because it's bigger, but it's also a lot more comfortable.
if you wanted power, why get exactly the same car as the mazda 3? if they put a v6 in the mazda 6, is going to become way more expensive and there are much cheaper options for the same power
Looks like a year since you posted your review. I currently own a 2006 3 and wanting to replace it. On the fence about getting a new 3 or a new 6, with 2.5 and manual in either choice. I have never driven a 6 and have not driven the new 3 either. Just curious what your thoughts would be after a year owning the 6. I have enjoyed my 3 and like driving it still and it has the 2.0 engine with manual transmission.
Tony Morris what did you get? I own an 04 mz3 and am facing the same dilemma. I drove both and neither felt as direct as my 04
“Or I can physically break it so it will never go up” that comment had be dying laughing 😂
After driving one I learned to love the steering & handling; this is such a tossable car. The feature content is great as well & the Premium tester feels like it is punching in a class above (e.g. Acura & Buick). The biggest complaint I have really is the utter lack of power, something of a common trait on all current Mazda products as of late (after the RX-8 & Speed 3 got axed). The Mazda 6 especially would benefit from the 2.5 turbo from the CX-9. It is a real shame Mazda doesn't sell more of these 6 as Accords, Camrys & Fusion sells.
After 21,567 miles on my 2015 Mazda6 I have averaged 30.1 mpg. That's with a 3200 mile road trip.
Props for your comment about wind noise. Something a lot of reviewers tend to forget to mention, and it's something I put a lot of weight on. Thanks!
Best review we have seen on a Mazda6 in a long time. Great job, we subscribed.
That HUD does look super annoying and would be a deal-breaker for me. Ever find any sort of way to just disable it entirely?
+YZRandomE Hammer.
I had M6 2,5l for test drive in 2015 and I absolutely loved the design, interior, handling...and the reason I didnt buy it was it really feels VERY sluggish for 192HP. It felt like it takes forever to get to speed. I hope M6 will come with 2,5T to my dealer.
I was pretty happy in my 2015 CX-5 but I was missing the manual transmission I had in my 2010 Mazda 3. I happened to look at the 2016 mazda 6 interior and I was sold. I traded my myCX-5 for a touring 6MT Mazda6. If I had a moonroof it would be perfect car.
Your honesty is refreshing and appreciated. Thank you and a great review as always.
Beautiful review!
Love the Cinematography in your videos. Great Job!
2 weeks ago, my 2016 Mazda 6 got killed off by the classic novice high school/college driver who sucked at left turn yielding from the opposite direction. Literally just hit 195k miles on what was supposed to be the drive back home from a local restaurant.
5 years that car has been rock solid. My only complaints are primarily related to the low profile tires… a trend that REALLY needs to die out first chance… the roads appear to be getting worse in certain areas and the last thing average motorists need is no sidewalk protection if/when they run something over. Just oil, routine maintenance, and suspension here & there.
Really hate that low profile tire/big ass rim trend as well. You are even forced to get bigger rims when you spec cars with higher trims these days. Such a retarded trend. And guess what, another crappy trend these days is the lack of any sort of spare tire. Good combination.
The roads are absolutely awful in most places now. I can totally see why people get 4 runners because the roads will tear up the suspension on a regular car. I feel your pain about your car being totaled, I had a 99 accord with 145k that was absolutely perfect we used to ponder what the old owner used to car for because of how clean it was even underneath there wasn’t a spot or rust on it. Then on my birthday some idiot In a Range Rover rear ended me and took off. I still kept the car in my back yard for months I couldn’t part with it but In the end I did. People forget half the battle of getting high miles out of your car is not only maintenance but watching out for idiot drivers.
@@thetechlibrarian some dumbass hit us from behind once while we were waiting on red light.. in a broad daylight. You really need to be always defensive as long as driving licence is this easy to get.
Now this is what you call class review......
I cracked up when he spoke about the trunk. LOL
I like to watch car reviews and no one has done a good review as you did here. Very objective and useful. Great job!
The two problems he pointed out about this car do not apply to me at 6'7" 165 lbs. I drove one and I am far enough back for the arm rest to work, and in my short drive, the HUD did not get in my way at all, maybe because I was higher up that I was not looking through as much as over it.
Jonathan Whiteacre Jesus. You’re a fucking real life stick figure.
very spot on on the interior. its what makes me want to get the 3 or the 6 compare to others
Really digging the USS Nostromo hat. Solid review broseph stalin.
That camera work and the jokes.....You have my subscription :D
Kick ass, like always.
How do you not have more subscribers?
I love that blue reflex colour on that Mazda
Wow I just found this channel and it screams PASSION. There is no routine, both reviews I watched seem so different it is an adventure of its own. Great work, you seem to be also very knowledgeable about cars. You sir have earned a new subscriber and I wish you the best!
+bartiz12 Glad you are liking the videos, appreciate it hope we dont let you down.
Hello guys, I also have a Mazda 6, I live in Europe and I have a 2.0 engine and 165 PS and I have no complaints. gearbox in manual mode and sport mode improves driving.
I love the refresh!!! I traded in my 2014 because the 2016 is so much better. 5 months and I very much enjoy my car :)
PS my car in no way feels slow. I just took 2 road trips and was bobbing and weaving, passing folk like a boss. It handles amazing in rain. I'm always first off the line at a light. I had to monitor myself to not maintain at 100mph and get pulled over. I get great gas mileage and I'm heavy footed. I forget to use sport mode though. What I really love is the handling and curves! I don't really see any reason to overpower the car. I prefer nimble. my friend drove it though and he felt it was twitchy but he was hopping too, lol. In regular point and go driving, you get bored because the car excels at hopping and zooming around slow folk. I was driving in NYC, which will let you know if your car has pep or not, and had no problems.
+BklynBabe sounds great, so mazda 6 is going to be my next car :) in near future tho.
+BklynBabe Wait till the Turbo 4 comes out in the 6. I think by 2017 for sure or sooner.
I got this mazda6 about 9 months ago influenced by your genuine review. I have loved it so much. except it's navigation which is very pain ful to use. wish Android Auto coming soon.love your channel. keep up your good work.
I love your reviews, they are excellent.
I'm torn between a 2016 Mazda6 Touring and a 2016 Subaru Legacy 4cyl. Having driven both, which one would you pick?
+109v Id take the Mazda 9/10 times unless you live in very bad weather.
Thank you. I live in Michigan.
Great work.
Put a set of decent all seasons on the Mazda.. and Im sure it would do equally as well as the Subbie.
If ya buy the Subbie.. stay with the Wagon. Otherwise dont bother.
The Mazda could do a "sporting" attitude.. if ya drive like he.. or I do.
Europeans: This car is good in EVERYTHING
Americans: Slow. Needs V6
+altaroffire56 Americans, want more power options in a big car. Its going to hold the car back from doing higher volumes here.
It seems like americans dont even care about mileage. Cheap commuter toyota with a v6 250 HP, "ehh it got decent acceleration".
Hey savage. What do you recommend Mazda 6 or Toyota Camry? Thanks!
I drive a Mazdaspeed6 and got a new Mazda 6 for a rental for a road trip. I'm really impressed with the car as a whole, with the exception of the engine. The engine is decent in the Mazda 3, but in the 6 the engine is simply not adequate. I'm looking forward to Mazda updating engine choices (like the turbo 4 in the new CX-9) on this platform because I would snatch one of those up in a heartbeat.
+Kelly Adams I agree 100% I test drove it after seeing it in the Toronto auto show. Fabulous looking inside and out. When I test drove it, the car was GUTLESS !!! I told the salesman, the car has no "zoom zoom". There was alot of wind and road noise. Also I found it to be very expensive. In Canada the Mazda 6 GT is the same price as the Honda accord.
+Brian Tye I live in Canada, go to the Canadian websites for Mazda & Honda to see: Canada the Mazda 6 GT is the same price as the Honda accord
+Brian Tye In Canada, Mazda 6, GT starts at $34,725 (Automatic). The Honda Accord EXL-V6 sells for $33,270 (Automatic). The Honda has a V-6 ... get it !! There is a HUGE difference in cars when you get a V-6 with 278 HP for $ 1,455.00 LESS.. I drove the Mazda 6, it was a joke !!! At that time I had a Nissan Altima and it would blow the doors off the Mazda. With taxes the Mazda comes to $39,463.84 . No Way would I buy it.
Just for an update, the new Accord no longer offers a V6 or a Coupe option and the automatics in the Honda is a CVT.
Wow what an awesome review! I'm thinking about picking one of these up!
Great points! Not your typical car reviewer that's for sure. First video of yours I've seen, subscribed
I have a 2014 Mazda 3 and the HUD is one of my favorite features. Im short and its in a perfect spot to not interfere with the line of sight but right where you need it to be to not take your eyes off the road. And the 3 is only around 200lb lighter and feels super quick. I've done 0-60 in under 7s which to me isnt slow unless youre comparing it to a sports car. The new Mazda's have almost no downside.
This is based off seeing Hyundais and GMs HUD which does all of this and better without the need for the flip up plastic. I know plenty like the Mazda HUD but I mean they need a way to lower it at least. The 3 with even 2.0 feels faster than the Mazda6, basically this cars only major downfall.
savagegeese
Well I traded a Veloster Turbo for my Mazda so I guess anything I drove after that car would feel great.
Is the gearing for the Mazda6 the same as in the Mazda3?
Great review. Fair criticisms. This is my current car, but I have the Touring trim, so no iffy heads up display. I love it. My next car will be an updated 6 with the turbo.
These reviews are well written and the transitions are seamless.
Geese power.
You and Motormouth are the best reviewers in the planet .
I just bought a 2016 Mazda6 Grand Touring w/Tech Package and it is just as you explained here in your review. I was actually beginning to think that you wouldn't do a review on this car. I am happy that you did. It's very accurate and true. Great review and please please please PLEASE keep up the good... ahem, the GREAT work.
Jason G.
Thank you glad you found some truth in it. Great car overall just needs some tweaks and more motor options next gen.
Does the 6 put the 'zoom' in 'zoom zoom'?
Mazda MUST get back the V6 for this one.
or a 4 cyl turbo of some sort, this is the only thing holding me back from this car, it's such a nice looking car overall but only one engine option for North America is sadness.
+n1zm0 Yes, I'm agree, this car it's really good and looks cool but the engine it's not the best for this one, there are some 4cyl engines with 300+ hp or at least they should put a 4cyl engine with 240hp.
Pato9795 I'd even take the torquey diesel that they keep saying they're bringing, but who knows about that anymore
+n1zm0 that's cool too, like bmw with diesel and gas engines.
A V6 option would be nice, but it won't happen. Mazda, like Volvo, is now a 4-cylinder engine only car manufacturer for their high fuel efficiency.
At the end of the day, 4-cylinders are fine for real world driving. I have a 4-cylinder '08 Accord with 190-hp, and it's more than sufficient for daily driving.
all the german car reviewers should take some ideas from this guy! i watched so many german reviews and no one of them was so detailed like this one.... keep it up guys! well done
Thank you for an inciteful and knowledgeable review of the 2016 Mazda 6. Your non biased delivery is very fluid and natural. You have really found your calling. You are able to do, what as a kid, I dreamed of doing. You can blame the August of 1984 issue of Motortrend magazine for that. Ever since buying that magazine, I have never been able to get enough of anything and everything car related. Just wish I had the finances to be able to indulge in the enthusiasm more. Looking forward to many more auto reviews from you. Keep up the good work.
As much as I hated your video why you ditched the mazda3, I admire this video/review. Great work.
I just test drove one. I did hear wind noise but not tire roar at 65+mph. I did not find this car sluggish at all. I am coming from a civic (cvt). ..I am very impressed with this car, hopefully the 2017 will address the wind noise with their claim of improved cabin noise reduction
Bought a 6 Touring a short time ago. On quality asphalt, you only hear the wind noise (and it is not an issue). On older concrete, the tire noise is noticeable, but coming from an older model Accord it doesn't bother me. The steering is excellent and the mileage has been great.
This is an awesome review! I bought my 2016 Mazda 6 Touring in November of 2015 and I've enjoyed it so far. I agree with a lot of what you said in this review, especially the engine and lack of power. The one thing that really irritates me and I know it's probably silly, I do not understand why Mazda put in blind spot monitors on the side mirrors but didn't invest in heated mirrors. My previous 2012 Chrysler 200 base model had heated mirrors and here in Oklahoma, we get a lot of frost in the winter and it blows my mind that they didn't include this. Aside from that though, I'm pretty happy with it!
Heated mirrors should be there. They activate with your rear defrost. :)
Very good review. Have a real interest in this car. Thanks.
Great, honest review. I'll wait for the 2017 model to see if they fix the armrest and maybe add a little bit more powerful engine. Thanks.
+Jack C Hopefully a more powerful engine will be available for the 6 and the 3 within a few years. The new SkyActiv 2.5 turbo charged 4 cylinder (rumored to be around 300 HP) is coming to the redesigned CX-9 for 2016. I would think they would make that as an option for the 3 and the 6 to make more sales to those that want more power.
+Robert Merrill Its been approved and the Turbo-4 will be offered in the 6 for 2017.
Jay Tsay I keep hearing rumors its coming to the 2017 6 and it would make sense if it does. Where did you hear it's confirmed? The 2016 6 just came out a few months ago. Do you have a link?
I work for a dealership and the last meeting Mazda held did give the go ahead to put the Turbo 4 which will be introduced in the CX-9 than the 6 the following year.
Jay Tsay I will take your word for it. Are you Mazda6club forum? Great info on there. I always look for updates there. Imagine the 2017 with a 2.5L Turbo, fixed armrest, push start button move down a little more, etc. It would be the perfect car for the average buyer.
No wonder Mazda is not currently using the “zoom- zoom” tagline anywhere in their advertising.
Sadly, soon enough, their new motto will be: sip- sip...
Great video and great review, subscribed!
You seemed to be more excited about the CX-5 than this 6. Is that a fair appraisal - is the CX-5 more fun to drive than the 6 or were liking the CX-5 in the context of it being a CUV (i.e. comparing it to its competitors RAV4, CRV, etc.)?
I liked the CX5 because it was best in segment mostly. Mazda 6 is also good for the same reasons but it is in a much more competitive segment with cars that have better engine options etc., so it was more difficult to appreciate. But if you don't care about the motor its on top of the list.
This is a lovely review, with amazing camerawork too
I drive mazda 6 wagon sport for two years now (43K km on the clock now) and in terms of fuel efficiency I'm very happy with it. I drive 50/50 city and highway and on one tank can do 750-850 km, which is just little less then I did in my previous turbodiesel car. True the car feels sometimes underpowered but by no means is slow. 0-100 km/h just over 8 seconds and doing 170 km/h with five adult people on board - not a problem (drive country side), could go much faster but I'd end up in prison in case caps stop me :)
Excellent car for its price, only thing that annoys me is the navigation system (tom tom based) - its just hard to use and my car does not support android auto :(
My favorite car. Best looking vehicle on the road.
wow is this channel growing I remember when he had a lot less subs , he's atleast grown over 100 thousand since then
Excellent review of the Mazda 6. Open, honest, knowledgeable, and detailed. Subscribe to this guy now.
What a fine line auto makers walk. They want to give good fuel economy; when they do , it is "why not a V-6", but when they up the game to a V-6, it is "well we expect better mileage". I suppose offering both as options would be the way to go.
Love the styling, best in class. Simple, yet elegant and exciting to look at. One thing though, my friends dad has one and interior materials are wearing out. 2015 vehicle! My 06 Camry still looks new, everything is intact. It's almost 10 years old! No other issues so far, though i would consider materials wearing out so soon quite an issue. Anyone else have this problem?
+adyyy22 No problem with mine. Had it for 2 years. You may want to check out the warranty on that. Shouldn't be an issue at this early of ownership.
Jay Tsay
he tried, Mazda will not cover it. Could be that he just had bad luck with the particular vehicle. Some companies that make quality cars sometimes slip too :)
Great review. Love the format and your editing skills. What cars are you going to review in the near future?
u really make the best videos here ... yes ur right that they messed up with the center arm rest and the ariel atom windshield/hud display !!!
i have the 2009 mazda 6 sport model - its a hidden hatchback thats got tons of space with a boyish (yet functional) spoiler for down force. the model's not available in the US but only in Europe, Asia and the gulf . theres an excellent spring loaded flip cover for 2 huge big gulp sized cup holders and an excellent center arm rest that has a button adjustment for forward and aft placement. wonder y they changed that for newer models?
but you're spot on with steering feel (as awesome for EA), the long brake pedal that i dislike too (as preferred is a quick brake feel) and nothing happening unless TC is off . But the car corners neutral and wouldnt be far tp say its a FWD BMW !
Great review !!!
got a 2017 Touring and liking it so far. I assume this is the reflex blue model? how do you like that color? when i first saw it at dealer i thought it was good, but seems like the light makes the color look slightly different. i ended up going with jet black because i couldnt deal with this one. Interior really sold me on the car. the dunlops do suck though. Engine seems fine to me but im not looking for massive power. they just released the 2018 with 2.5 Turbo but your going to pay 3K more than touring. so if you are already in the 29k to 30k price range then go for it but i was looking for more mid-20s. i drove a couple other cars and just kept coming back to this one. exterior and interior were very good. engine adequate and gets good mpg. the only issue again is the tires. not a deal breaker though as you say.
impressive production value. we done, great review.
Ugh....buy the lower trim model without the heads up display. Problem solved. And this is not a slow car. Don't be afraid to put your foot down to get around the factory economy programming
Not sure why you got thumbs down. This is actually a great review. Thank you.
Any chance you can get a hold of the manual version?
Q.
Great review, and two thumbs up for Between the Buried and Me
I routinely get 50+ mpg, upto 56 with a tailwind, going from 2500 to 2000 ft elevation over 11 miles with cruise set at 68 on the hwy portion which makes up 90% of the commute, and get 35-40 on the return.
"Welcome, SHUT UP BIRDS!" LOL. The best intro ever. Great stuff. as always.