KIRAT 10 | Who was the last King of Kirat dynasty? | Fall of Kirat Dynasty |
Vložit
- čas přidán 28. 08. 2024
- The first King of the Kirat dynasty was Yalamber, who defeated Bhuvan Singh, the last king of the Ahir Dynasty, and established Kirat rule in Nepal. According to many historians, there were altogether 29 Kings of this dynasty who ruled over Nepal for about 1300 years..
OUR NEW SHORT CHANNEL: / @sarthaknepalshorts
Facebook Page: www.facebook.c...
Instagram: / history_in_nepali
Twitter: / history_nepali
The program is presented by Sarthak Nepal, MA in History (Topper), B.Ed.
KIRAT 10 || Who was the last King of the Kirat dynasty? || Fall of Kirat Dynasty || #sarthaknepalshorts ||
History in Nepali is a critical source for learning the History of Nepal and the World based on reliable sources. Each content is backed by references. The main aim of this channel is to provide historical knowledge of Nepal and the world for students, researchers, and ordinary people who want to know the facts about historical events. The main contents are:
* Ancient History of Nepal
* Kirat Period
* Lichhabi Period
* Baise and Chaubise Rajya of Nepal
* Malla Dynasty of Nepal
* Shah Dynasty from Gorkha to Nepal
* Rana Regime of Nepal
* Democratic Revolution of Nepal
* Fall of Kingdom and Rise of Republic system in Nepal
* History of the World
सही तथ्यमा आधारीत नेपाल तथा विश्व इतिहासका ज्ञानवर्धक जानकारीहरुलाइ उजागार गर्ने उद्धेश्य लिएर यो कार्यक्रम तयार गरिएको छ । इतिहासमा उच्च शिक्षा हासिल गरिसकेका युवाहरूको समूहद्धारा यो "History in Nepali" युट्युव च्यानल संचालन गरीएकोले सहि सामाग्रीहरु प्रसारण हुने कुरामा यहांहरुलाइ विश्वास दिलाउन चाहान्छौं । यो कार्यक्रम इतिहासका विधार्थीहरू, इतिहासमा अनुसन्धान गर्नुहुने व्यक्तित्वहरु, लोकसेवा आयोग तथा सेवा आयोगको तयारी र इतिहास जान्न चाहना राख्ने आम व्यक्तीहरुका लागि पनि उत्तीकै महत्वपुर्ण सामाग्री हुनेमा हामीहरु विश्वस्त छौं ।
For personal or business inquiries:
Email: digbrary18@gmail.com
धन्यवाद् । - Admin (History in Nepali)
#historyinnepali #sarthaknepalshorts
History in Nepali, @HistoryinNepali, History of the World, Sharthak Nepal Shorts,
अति सुन्दर विश्लेषण !! 👍️🙏❤️
धेरै जानकारी मुलक इतिहास
भिड़ियो को लागी धन्यवादं👏🙏
Hajur lai Dherai Dherai Badai
Nepal AMA ko Desh ma kas kas le Raj chalaye ko HISTORY,
S, ko Barema.Thank you.
🎉🙏👍❤
Thank you.
Very good historical event
Derai ramro lagyo 🙏🙏🙏
सोम बङ्सिहरु नै थिए किरातिहरुलाइ हराउने।किरातिहरु यसकारण हारे धेरैले बुद्धिस्ट धर्म अपनाए धर्मकै कारण किरातिहरुबिच एक आपसमै असमक्षदारी बिबाद नै पतनको कारण बने सोमबङ्सिहरुको अतिक्रमण पछि कतिपय किरातिहरु काठमाडौभित्रै ज्यापू पोडे हरु भएर बसे अनि पुर्बतिर लाग्नेहरु सुनुवार सुरेल जिरेल थामिहरु सिन्धुपाल्चोक दोलखा सिन्धुलि रामेछाप वारिपरी बसे जसलाई वाल्लो किरात पछिसम्म भनियो बिचमाअहिलेको ओखलढुंगा उदयपुर खोटाङ भोजपुर धनकुटा इलाम सुनसरी नौलखा राइहरु बसे जसलाई पनि पछिल्लो सासनकालमा माझकिरात नाम दिइयो जो पल्लो किरात भनी अहिलेका जिल्लाहरु पाचथर सङ्खुवासभा ताप्लेजुङ तेह्रथुम झापा र सिक्किम तिर लिम्बू याक्खाहरु पुगे र बसोबास गरे जो किरातहरु बुद्धिष्ट भए मगर गुरुङ र तामाङ हरु कहालिए तामाङहरु अहिलेको नुवाकोट सिन्धुपाल्चोक मकवानपुर अन्य जिल्लाहरु छरिएर बसोबास गरे पश्चिमत्तिर मगर गुरुङहरु बसोबास गरे
❤❤❤❤❤
bhutro jasto analysis.....Uso bhaye Gopal bhansa bata aayekaa chai ko ? mahispaal bata aayeko ko ? licchavi bata aayeko ko ho ?
@@surajchalise गोपालहरुले गाई पाल्थे महिसपालहरुले भैंसी पालन गर्थ्ये यिनिहरु अहिलेको यादबहरु भनेपनी फरक पर्दैन यिनिहरुलाइ किराँती सरदार यलम्बरद्वरा पराजित पछि किरातिहरुको शासन रह्यो लिच्छिबिहरु सोम बङ्सिपछी आएका थिए।
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
राई र लिम्बु समुदायहरूको उत्पत्ति चीनको सिचुवान प्रान्तमा भेटिन्छ। तेह्रौं शताब्दीमा, मंगोल आक्रमणहरूले मध्य एशियाका विशाल क्षेत्रमा कहर फैलाए। यस उथलपुथल र विस्थापनको समयमा, राई र लिम्बुहरूका पुर्खाहरूले मंगोल आक्रमणको महामारीबाट शरण खोज्दै उनीहरूको कठिन यात्रा सुरु गरे। सिचुवानबाट, यी आप्रवासीहरू पहाडका मार्गहरू र सुनसान स्टेपहरू पार गर्दै, अन्ततः उत्तरी तिब्बत क्षेत्रमा अस्थायी शरण पाउने आशा गरिरहेका थिए। तिब्बती जनजातिहरू बीचको अन्तरिक संघर्ष र कठोर जलवायू परिस्थितिहरूले उत्तरी तिब्बतमा उनीहरूको बसाइलाई अनिश्चित बनायो। उत्तरी तिब्बतमा बिग्रँदै गएको परिस्थितिले अर्को आप्रवासनको आवश्यकता देखायो। सोलहौं शताब्दीमा, राई र लिम्बुहरूले फेरि जरा उखेल्न थाले, यस पटक भारतीय उपमहाद्वीपतर्फ दक्षिणतर्फ यात्रा गर्दै। उनीहरूको मार्गले उनीहरूलाई विशाल हिमालय पार गरायो, जुन यात्रा खतराहरूले भरिएको र प्राकृतिक सुन्दरताले भरिएको थियो। यो यात्रा उनीहरूको पूर्वी नेपालको आगमनमा समापन भयो, जहाँ उनीहरूलाई अधिक अनुकूल वातावरण र स्थायी बसोबासको सम्भावना भेटियो। पूर्वी नेपालमा आइपुग्दा, राई र लिम्बुहरू सेन राजाहरूको अधीनमा थिए, साथै लेप्चा जनजातिहरूको भूभागमा थिए। सेन राजाहरूले , यी थकित शरणार्थीहरूलाई स्वागत गरे। लेप्चाहरूले पनि दाजुभाइ र सद्भावको भावना देखाउँदै, उनीहरूको नयाँ छिमेकीलाई उनीहरूको भूमि र स्रोतहरूको हिस्सा दिए। यसरी, राई र लिम्बुहरूले उनीहरूको नयाँ मातृभूमिमा आत्मसात र एकीकृत हुने प्रक्रिया सुरु गरे, बिस्तारै स्थानीय सामाजिक संरचनाको अभिन्न अंगको रूपमा स्थापित गर्दै। राई र लिम्बुहरू नेपाल प्रवेश गरेपछि उनीहरूले आफ्नो पुरानो भाषा परित्याग गरे र तिब्बतियन र लेप्चाहरूको भाषा अपनाए। साथै, सेन ठकुरी राज्यको नेपाली भाषा पनि उनीहरूले ग्रहण गरे। यो भाषागत परिवर्तनले उनीहरूको आप्रवासन र ती क्षेत्रमा भेटिएका सांस्कृतिक प्रभावहरूको प्रमाण प्रदान गर्दछ। यो स्पष्ट रूपमा देखिन्छ कि यी समुदायहरू शरणार्थीको रूपमा विभिन्न स्थानहरूमा गए र त्यहाँको भाषाहरूले उनीहरूको भाषालाई प्रभावित गर्यो। स्थिति सुरक्षित गर्न र स्वदेशी स्थितिको दाबीलाई बलियो बनाउन, राई र लिम्बुहरूले आफूलाई प्राचीन किरात वंशसँग जोड्ने कथाहरू बनाउँन थाले। आफूलाई यो प्रशंसनीय किरात वंशसँग जोडेर, राई र लिम्बुहरूले उनीहरूको उपस्थिति वैध बनाउन र पूर्वी नेपालको भूमि र स्रोतहरूको अधिकार दाबी गर्न खोजे। तथापि, ऐतिहासिक र पुरातात्विक प्रमाणहरूको सावधानीपूर्वक परीक्षा यस निर्मित कथाको सत्यतामा प्रश्न उठाउँछ। पूर्वी नेपालको प्राचीन स्थलहरू, जसमा किल्लाहरू, दरबारहरू, र शिलालेखहरू छन्, मुख्यत: सेन ठकुरी र लेप्चा समुदायको छाप हुन्। यी पुराना युगका प्रत्यक्ष अवशेषहरूले यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भएका समूहहरूको समृद्ध सांस्कृतिक र राजनीतिक सम्पदालाई प्रमाणित गर्छन्। यी समूहहरू राई र लिम्बुहरूको आगमनभन्दा लामो समय अघि यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित थिए। बरु, त्यहाँ ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूको अनुपस्थिति छ, जुन राई र लिम्बुहरूलाई 17th शताब्दी भन्दा पहिले यस क्षेत्रमा लिंक गर्न सक्छ। यो प्रमाणको अभावले उनीहरूको दाबी गरिएको किरात वंशको ऐतिहासिक सत्यतामा प्रश्न उठाउँछ। सिक्किम, दार्जिलिङ र उत्तर पूर्वको शक्ति गतिको सन्दर्भमा किरात कथाको राजनीतिक उपयोगिता स्पष्ट हुन्छ।
❤❤❤❤
Bro is a legend
jai jai kirateswor mahadev...paaruhaang-sumnima😍
Thank you very much for historical informations.
श्री जङ्ग थेबे र किराँती बुद्धि कर्ण रायको बारेमा पनि video हेर्न मन छ
same here hai bro. malaai pani mann xa. ❤
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Sarai ramro lagyo sansar karmi jiu🙏👍❤️hajur lai(hardik 2)badhai chha,
Y
hajuralai dhanyabata
we are proud of kinrat dynasty
Wow
नेपालमा अनि किन अहिलेसम्म किराँती छन् त हजुरले जति भन्नुभयो केही साचो छन् तर धेरै कुरा साचो आएन नि हजुर 🙏हाम्रो किरातको कथा ।
History are written by winners ani yo author pani aru ley j lekhya cha tei ta ho bhanni
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
राई र लिम्बु समुदायहरूको उत्पत्ति चीनको सिचुवान प्रान्तमा भेटिन्छ। तेह्रौं शताब्दीमा, मंगोल आक्रमणहरूले मध्य एशियाका विशाल क्षेत्रमा कहर फैलाए। यस उथलपुथल र विस्थापनको समयमा, राई र लिम्बुहरूका पुर्खाहरूले मंगोल आक्रमणको महामारीबाट शरण खोज्दै उनीहरूको कठिन यात्रा सुरु गरे। सिचुवानबाट, यी आप्रवासीहरू पहाडका मार्गहरू र सुनसान स्टेपहरू पार गर्दै, अन्ततः उत्तरी तिब्बत क्षेत्रमा अस्थायी शरण पाउने आशा गरिरहेका थिए। तिब्बती जनजातिहरू बीचको अन्तरिक संघर्ष र कठोर जलवायू परिस्थितिहरूले उत्तरी तिब्बतमा उनीहरूको बसाइलाई अनिश्चित बनायो। उत्तरी तिब्बतमा बिग्रँदै गएको परिस्थितिले अर्को आप्रवासनको आवश्यकता देखायो। सोलहौं शताब्दीमा, राई र लिम्बुहरूले फेरि जरा उखेल्न थाले, यस पटक भारतीय उपमहाद्वीपतर्फ दक्षिणतर्फ यात्रा गर्दै। उनीहरूको मार्गले उनीहरूलाई विशाल हिमालय पार गरायो, जुन यात्रा खतराहरूले भरिएको र प्राकृतिक सुन्दरताले भरिएको थियो। यो यात्रा उनीहरूको पूर्वी नेपालको आगमनमा समापन भयो, जहाँ उनीहरूलाई अधिक अनुकूल वातावरण र स्थायी बसोबासको सम्भावना भेटियो। पूर्वी नेपालमा आइपुग्दा, राई र लिम्बुहरू सेन राजाहरूको अधीनमा थिए, साथै लेप्चा जनजातिहरूको भूभागमा थिए। सेन राजाहरूले , यी थकित शरणार्थीहरूलाई स्वागत गरे। लेप्चाहरूले पनि दाजुभाइ र सद्भावको भावना देखाउँदै, उनीहरूको नयाँ छिमेकीलाई उनीहरूको भूमि र स्रोतहरूको हिस्सा दिए। यसरी, राई र लिम्बुहरूले उनीहरूको नयाँ मातृभूमिमा आत्मसात र एकीकृत हुने प्रक्रिया सुरु गरे, बिस्तारै स्थानीय सामाजिक संरचनाको अभिन्न अंगको रूपमा स्थापित गर्दै। राई र लिम्बुहरू नेपाल प्रवेश गरेपछि उनीहरूले आफ्नो पुरानो भाषा परित्याग गरे र तिब्बतियन र लेप्चाहरूको भाषा अपनाए। साथै, सेन ठकुरी राज्यको नेपाली भाषा पनि उनीहरूले ग्रहण गरे। यो भाषागत परिवर्तनले उनीहरूको आप्रवासन र ती क्षेत्रमा भेटिएका सांस्कृतिक प्रभावहरूको प्रमाण प्रदान गर्दछ। यो स्पष्ट रूपमा देखिन्छ कि यी समुदायहरू शरणार्थीको रूपमा विभिन्न स्थानहरूमा गए र त्यहाँको भाषाहरूले उनीहरूको भाषालाई प्रभावित गर्यो। स्थिति सुरक्षित गर्न र स्वदेशी स्थितिको दाबीलाई बलियो बनाउन, राई र लिम्बुहरूले आफूलाई प्राचीन किरात वंशसँग जोड्ने कथाहरू बनाउँन थाले। आफूलाई यो प्रशंसनीय किरात वंशसँग जोडेर, राई र लिम्बुहरूले उनीहरूको उपस्थिति वैध बनाउन र पूर्वी नेपालको भूमि र स्रोतहरूको अधिकार दाबी गर्न खोजे। तथापि, ऐतिहासिक र पुरातात्विक प्रमाणहरूको सावधानीपूर्वक परीक्षा यस निर्मित कथाको सत्यतामा प्रश्न उठाउँछ। पूर्वी नेपालको प्राचीन स्थलहरू, जसमा किल्लाहरू, दरबारहरू, र शिलालेखहरू छन्, मुख्यत: सेन ठकुरी र लेप्चा समुदायको छाप हुन्। यी पुराना युगका प्रत्यक्ष अवशेषहरूले यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित भएका समूहहरूको समृद्ध सांस्कृतिक र राजनीतिक सम्पदालाई प्रमाणित गर्छन्। यी समूहहरू राई र लिम्बुहरूको आगमनभन्दा लामो समय अघि यस क्षेत्रमा स्थापित थिए। बरु, त्यहाँ ऐतिहासिक प्रमाणहरूको अनुपस्थिति छ, जुन राई र लिम्बुहरूलाई 17th शताब्दी भन्दा पहिले यस क्षेत्रमा लिंक गर्न सक्छ। यो प्रमाणको अभावले उनीहरूको दाबी गरिएको किरात वंशको ऐतिहासिक सत्यतामा प्रश्न उठाउँछ। सिक्किम, दार्जिलिङ र उत्तर पूर्वको शक्ति गतिको सन्दर्भमा किरात कथाको राजनीतिक उपयोगिता स्पष्ट हुन्छ।
आहा कति राम्रो भिडियो हाम्रो इतिहास संङ को पो रहेछ । म धनकुटा जिल्ला बाट हेरदै छु २०८०/०८/१४ गते बिहिवार 🌺🌺💚💚🙏🙏🙏
Oh hello sir yaah sab jhuto ithihas bhaneko xa 😂😂
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
सहि समाचार
We are the kiratey i ho kirat ki jai jai hos ,,,
We must think 🤔 in future, think give us good to know and understand everything
Good job bro thanks 4 video.
0:16
Nice
Good kath
You are requested to let me know about who were Som & Lichibi.
Kumaon Gadwal rajya ko barema video banaunu na sir
मइस् पाल भनेको पनि किरातिनै हो दादा चाम्लिङग् राइले भैसिलाइ मइस् भन्छन्
🙏🙏🙏🙏❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
किरातको वेद होईन
किरात को मुन्धुम हो
Sarthak Bhai,
Kiranti haru Mahabharat yudha ma pani gayeka thiye bhanne pani chha ni sancho ho ta?
😂😂😂..hasayo
Geda
Maya cha
Who was the king after yokne Hang?
Most fine out please lpease
गोपाल र महिशपाल राजा कतै थिएनन (ग्वाला , र भैँसी हेर्ने ) किरात भन्दा अगाडि अगोटन ईतिहास बंनाएका हुन ।
किराती हरु न त बौद्ध धर्म प्रति लालायित थिए न त शैवालम्वी थिए यो त हिन्दुकरण को कुरा हो ।पारु हाङ लाई किरातेश्वर अथवा किरातहरु को ईश्वर भनेर बादमा महादेव बनाए हो ,जाहिरै छ सनातनी हरुको पुज्य देव बिष्णु हो र टिका पनि लामो U को जस्तो निधारमा लाउछन र लगाई दिन्छन ।
ईतिहास मा बदलाव देखाइएको छ अध्ययन गरिबक्सियोस ।
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Gopal bansa, mahespal bansa ko rajye kaal ko hisab ra lichhabi ko rajye ko hisab le bich ma 1000 barsa kirat le kasari raaj garyo? Ani malla kaal? 1700 shah bansa?
किरात कालमा, खै भाषा चाहिँ नेपाली नै थियो कि क्या हो,भाषा बाँचे जाती बाच्छ,जाती बाचे,संस्कार,संस्कृती,बाँच्छ ।
A महाशय तपाईलाई सक्कल इतिहास केही पनि थाह छैन के। हाम्रो इतिहास हाम्लाई राम्रो संग थाह छ। । के तिमीहरू हाम्रो भाषा बुज्छौ त। यस्तो ताइन तुइको इतिहास नबनाऊ है। खस आर्य हरू नेपालमा आउनु भन्दा अगाडि यहाँ किराँती हरू थिए नेपाल भूमि सिदा तिब्बतको कैलाश क्षेत्र भित्र पर्छ ।। अध्ययन राम्रो संग गर है।
सबै कुराको जानकारी छ भनेर नयाँ कुरा सिक्न नखाेज्नु नै तिमीहरु जस्ता भाेटेहरु पछि पर्नुको मुख्य कारण हाे । यत्तिका मिहिनेत गरेर video बनाएको छ, कमसेकम ज्ञान त ले mji.
@@simpletechtipsstt4295 जानिस् ??तिमीले चाहिँ ! यस्तो जहाँ पयो त्यही मान्छे भुलाउउने भिडियो हरू नबनाएकै राम्रो। तिम्मीहरुको के चाहिँ नयाँ कुरा सिक्न पर्ने ? आफ्नो असली इतिहास मारेर अरूले भनेको भरमा कुद्यो भने। त सब पतन हुन्छ।। र नयाँ। कुरा सिक्ने भनेको विकासका कुराहरू र सीपका कुराहरू हुन् । इतिहास पहिचान र अस्थित्व कहिले गुमाउनु हुँदैन ।।
@@Usr-NAMASTE12- अरे गुभाेटे भाइ, कि त अङ्ग्रेजीमा लेख कि त तेराे भाेटे भाषामा लेख, नेपाली भाषामा नलेख ,याे तेरो भाषा नै हैन । त्याे कुरा तेरो लाजै लाग्दाे अशुद्ध नेपाली लेखाइबाट पनि थाहा हुन्छ । अनि अर्को कुरा Christian बनेर विदेशी dollar खाकाे गन्हाउने थुतुनो लिएर नआईजा गुभाेटे ।
Pahila nepal vanya KTM matra ho
@@simpletechtipsstt4295 ए विदेशी बाहुनको छाउरा धेरै जान्ने भएर हाम्लाई । नसिका ।
EKDAMAI RAMRO LAGYOHAI, ARUPANI SATYA TATHYA HARULAI PRATHMIKTA DIDAI JANUHOLA HAI
इस तेरो विश्लेषण तेरै साथमा राख नेपालको असली नाम नेवाल हो। यो नेपाल नाम ५ हजार बर्ष अघि सुन्दर पानीको नाम बाट बनेको हो। हाम्रो इतिहास बुज्ने हो भने हाम्रो मुन्धुम काफी हुन्छ।।
खस आर्य। यानी इन्दो आर्य नेपाल आउनु अघि नेपालमा किराँत राज थियो उनीहरु ब्रम्हपुत्र बाट अहिलेको काठमाडौं खाल्डो मा आएको थियो त्यति बेला अहिलेको नेपाल घना जंगल र गुफा हरू ले घेरिएको थियो। त्यो बुद्ध गुम्बा हरू २५ सय वर्ष मा बनेको हो। अहिले भन्ने हो भने ४ हजार भयो होला तर किराँत हरुको त धेरै पुरानो सभ्यता भेटिन्छ काठमाडौं खाल्डो मा। किरातीहरु कृषि युगमा पुग्दा काे समय खस आर्य। हरू काठमाडौं खाल्डो मा माता तीर्थ मनाउन यालखोम आउँथे । तर त्यही समय ताका मिलेर बसेको। सभ्यतालाई किराँत भनेको हो। सक्कल इतिहास त हाम्रो मुन्धुम हो तिमीहरूको इतिहास त २५ सय वर्ष देखि सुरु भएको हो। । किन भने गोपाल र महिषपाल। त २ ३ वर्षको फरक मात्र हो।। यो समय भनेको २५ सय देखि ३ हजार वर्षको समयको अंतराल हो। किराँतको इतिहास यालखोम मा। गुफा देखि। निस्केर कृषि युग सुरु भएको। लिच्छवि समय ताका ६००० बर्ष काे हो सब त १० हजार बर्ष भइसक्यो किरतकालकाे। कृषियुग त।। तिमीहरू अहिलेको फुचे हरुलाई केही पनि राम्रो जानकारी छैन । खस हरू नेपाल। खाल्डो भित्रेको त्यही २५ सय वर्षको अंतराल हो। त्यही समय सिला लेख लेख्ने चलन स्थापित भएको हो। कागजी रुमा लेख्ने चलन काे विकास त ईरान हुँदै हालको भारत मा। अल्बरुनी काे प्रवेश पछी मात्र भएको हो।। यो सब थाह पाउन त बाबु लामो। कालखण्ड काे इतिहास। कोतार्नु पर्छ। । त्यतिकै आफ्नो मात्र साम्राज्य खडा गर्न ताई न तुइको हावा फुकेर हुँदैन।। गोपाल वंशको इतिहास बारे त्यही अल्बरुनी ले लेखेको हो। किन् भने उनी गोपाल बंश भित्रको आर्य मूलका थिए।। र उनको इतिहास इरानमा ४००० बर्ष र भारतमा ३००० बर्ष। र नेपालमा उनको पछिल्लो पुस्ता ५०० देखि ६०० सय वर्ष भेटिन्छ।। धेरै लामो इतिहास छैन नेपाल र भारतमा ।।
भारत मा कक्सियण ( मंगोल रेस का खस) र एशियामा ( मांगोलोइड ) काे सभ्यता भेटिन्छ तर आर्य हरू ( अरब ) काे सभ्यता भेटिन्न ।। तिमीहरूको आर्य बर्त भनेको उत्तरी धुब्र तिर पर्ने अरब मुलक क्षेत्र हो । भारत हैन। भारत नाम बन्नु अघि पुराई एशिया लाई कुरुक्षेत्र ( किराँत यहाङ ) भन्थ्यो।। तिमीलाई यहूदी काे हो भनेर थाहै छैन।। यहूदी हरू मंगोल रेसको भोटे ( लेप्चा ) हुन् उनीहरूकाे इतिहास पढ। अहिलेको पालेस्तिन र इजरायल को युद्व भनेको यहुदा बिरुद्दको हो। इजरायलमा ( इजिप्ट ) मुस्लिम मूलका इशाई हरू छिर्न अघि यहुदा हरू थिए। यहुदा पछी सुडानी प्रवेश गरेका थिए त्यस पछि ख्नान्टे छिरे। र फरोशी छिरे। त्यसैले नेपालको सेम इतिहास संग मिल्दो जुल्दो छ। तर किराँत सबै भन्दा अगाडि। नेपालमा थिए। इजिपको इतिहास भनेको १०००० देखि ४००० वर्षको हो । त्यहाँ काे सभ्यता मंगोलिलिय प्रान्त संग सम्बन्धित छ नेपाल संग हैन।।उनीहरूले भारतमा आफ्नो इतिहास दोहोराएर लेखेको हो र नेपालमा उल्लू बनाउन घोकाएको कुरा हामीलाई राम्रो संग थाह छ ।। किन् भने हाम्रो मुन्धुमले त्यति धेरै टाढाको इतिहास देखाउँदैन।। नेपालमा चाहिँ लेप्चा हरुले ल्याएको हो। किन् भने लेपचाहरु पनि फेदेम्बा छन्।। लेप्चा हरू चीनमा पनि छ।। लेप्चा मूलका स्रोङ चोङ गम्पो न्याँँगाल नै शाक्य हरू हुन्। त्यही शक हरू सुनुवार बंश भित्र पर्न सक्छ किन् भने उनीहरूको भाषा केही मिल्दो जुल्दो छ। जस्तो खुशी हाल कोशी हाम्रोले खुवालुङ भन्छ।। हाम्रो इतिहास कतिको थाह छ तिमीहरूलाई ?????
Changez khan sanga sodh bhai mangolharuko itihas nepal ma xaina.
@@debendrasahdebendrasah6369
चंगेज। खान भनेको मोनक काे सन्तान हो तिब्बत बाट मंगोलिया गएका थिए उनको पिता।।
ए भाइ तिमीलाई रियल हिस्टोरी केहि पनि थाह छैन मोंगोलोइड भनेको समेत थाह नहुनेले के बहस गर्छौ हो ।? पारा तातेर आउँछ ।।
Aile ko time mani limbu harule hami kirat hoina vanxan ta yalamber lai king manxa tara rai kirat ho limbu hoina vanxan ta..
लिच्छबि बङ्श कुन जातिलाई भनिन्छ ।
Rajput ho
KHOI K GARNU RA KHOI CHUKCHUKCHUKCHUKCHUK BAAHEK ARU XAI NA FROM JAPAN 🐒🐒🇳🇵🇳🇵🐃🐃🇳🇵🇳🇵🐅🐅🇳🇵🇳🇵
केही कुरा मिलेन
किराँतहरुले शिवलाई देउता मन्थे भन्ने कुरा गलत हो
akash vairab is what ???? And who you should read Ramayan
research garnu hola dherai kirant bare
Kira haru lai lichhavi le katera khedeka hun.
Mero bicharma hami Daju bhai palö palö garthe rahechha
Hawa chiknay yellembar raja Mahabharat KO pratakxay sakxi theya ittihas nabuji bolxa
kathmanudu jabo lai nepal bhanera hunxa ra gede haru
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Hudai navako k ko kirati kaal ho. At best kiratis were a small group of wanderers and hunter gatherers who could have traveled for a short period in Nepal. They certainly were not a civilization in any standard.
😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣 dherai tha raixa tw yo machiknelai waiyat
Yo kun mula ho hawa ko itihas leknea.? 😡😡😡👊👊👊👊 gala ma parkaw nu man lageyo
सक्कली ईतिहास पढन जा भाइ किराँती को मा नभए यस्तो झुट प्रचार नगर
Chapter X: Rais and Limbus: Refugees from Sichuan Who Fabricated Connections with the Kirat Dynasty
The historical journey of the Rais and Limbus begins in Sichuan province, China. During the Mongol conquests, significant upheaval forced many communities to flee their homeland. The Rais and Limbus migrated from Sichuan to northern Tibet, and eventually, by the 17th century, they settled in eastern Nepal. Seeking refuge from the conflicts and instability of their original regions, they found protection and land from the Sen kings of Nepal and the Bhutia Chogyals of Sikkim.
Genetic and Cultural Evidence
Genetic studies provide compelling evidence of the origins of the Rais and Limbus. These studies show a significant proportion of Mongolian and northern Chinese DNA in these communities, distinguishing them from other Tibeto-Burman groups in the Indian subcontinent. Their cultural practices, languages, and traditions also bear closer resemblance to those found in northern China and Mongolia, rather than the indigenous cultures of eastern Nepal.
The Historical Dominance of Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya
Before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus, the regions of eastern Nepal and Sikkim were dominated by various other ethnic groups. The Lepchas and Bhutias were prominent in Sikkim, with the Bhutia Chogyals ruling the kingdom for centuries. In Nepal, the Newars and Khas Aryas held significant influence, with the Khas Malla kingdom and the Sen Thakuri dynasty leaving behind numerous forts, palaces, and inscriptions. These groups had established rich cultural and political traditions long before the arrival of the Rais and Limbus.
Fabrication of Kirat Connections
While the Kirat dynasty did exist, the Rais and Limbus have no substantial archaeological or historical evidence linking them to this ancient lineage. Instead, they fabricated connections with the Kirats to claim indigenous status in the region. Prominent Limbu historian Iman Singh Chemjong played a crucial role in this fabrication by promoting the idea of a unified Kirat heritage that included the Rais and Limbus. This narrative, however, often overshadowed the histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Chemjong's writings and the political mobilization around the Kirat identity contributed to the marginalization of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the Kirat narrative at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha and Bhutia in Sikkim, and the Newar and Khas Arya in Nepal. The emphasis on Kirat identity, bolstered by Chemjong's work, led to a rewriting of regional history that minimized the contributions and legacies of these other groups.
The Lack of Archaeological Evidence for Kirat Dominance by Rais and Limbus
One of the significant criticisms of the Rais and Limbus' claimed Kirat identity is the absence of archaeological evidence supporting their long-term dominance in eastern Nepal. Unlike the tangible remnants of the Sen Thakuri and Khas Malla kingdoms, such as forts, palaces, and inscriptions, there are no comparable archaeological sites attributed to a Kirat civilization connected to the Rais and Limbus. This lack of evidence raises questions about the historical accuracy of their claimed Kirat lineage as an ancient and indigenous connection in the region.
Erasure of Indigenous Histories
The arrival and subsequent integration of the Rais and Limbus into Nepal and Sikkim had profound implications for the historical narratives of the region. The promotion of the Kirat identity, particularly by figures like Iman Singh Chemjong, has contributed to the erasure of other ethnic histories. Historical texts and educational curricula began to emphasize the fabricated Kirat narrative, often at the expense of the established histories of the Lepcha, Bhutia, Newar, and Khas Arya peoples.
Yo hawa kura ho satye etihaas chai metenxa ghalat etihass banauxa timiharule 😂😂😂😂🥴
Ani yo vane naii kirati haina ka bata satya vanos greater Nepal ko pani wrong map dhekako xaw vanesii ithihas k nai hora 😂😂