What is the Gamma Function?

Sdílet
Vložit
  • čas přidán 9. 10. 2017
  • Question 7 from Tom Rocks Maths and I Love Mathematics - answering the questions sent in and voted for by YOU. This time we've got probability distributions, complex analysis and of course Pi (because it appears everywhere)... I give you the Gamma Function.
    Full playlist: • How many ping-pong bal...
    Q1: What is the probability I have the same PIN as someone else?
    Q2: How long would it take to sink to the bottom of the ocean?
    Q3: What is the gravitational field of a hollow Earth?
    Q4: What is the best way to win at the board game Monopoly?
    Q5: What are the most basic Mathematical Axioms?
    Q6: How does Modular Arithmetic work?
    Q7: What is the Gamma Function?
    Q8: How many ping-pong balls would it take to lift the Titanic from the ocean floor?
    Q9: What is the graph of x^x?
    Q10: How can you show geometrically that Pi is between 3 and 4?
    Produced by Dr Tom Crawford at the University of Oxford.
    For more maths content check out Tom's website tomrocksmaths.com/
    You can also follow Tom on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram @tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    / tomrocksmaths
    Get your Tom Rocks Maths merchandise here:
    beautifulequations.net/collec...

Komentáře • 244

  • @TomRocksMaths
    @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety +20

    There are still another 9 videos for you to enjoy in the series - find them all here: czcams.com/video/by8Mf6Lm5I8/video.html

  • @ANTONIOMARTINEZ-zz4sp
    @ANTONIOMARTINEZ-zz4sp Před 3 lety +35

    I met you watching a Numberphile video and fell in love with the way you communicate. And today I found out your maths channel. Thanks a lot for making my day!

  • @Sigma.Infinity
    @Sigma.Infinity Před rokem +14

    I thoroughly enjoyed this video. I not only learnt about the gamma function but also about a useful approach to solving difficult integrals, and I was entertained and inspired by your energy and enthusiasm. Thank you!

  • @attilanemeth8914
    @attilanemeth8914 Před 11 měsíci +6

    Your explanation is as much as a mission about fantastic discoveries and joy of maths as understanding something as a very practical tool to manage a lot of phenomenons in real life.

  • @Niawen2011
    @Niawen2011 Před 5 lety +7

    Frikking incredible! I've tried & tried to understand the gamma function and you've made it crystal clear in under 12 minutes. Thank you, Thank you, Thank you, !!! I'll be watchin' you, boy.

  • @nicholasachuz8329
    @nicholasachuz8329 Před 26 dny +1

    You just make my life easier everytime i tune in

  • @weaamfahmy
    @weaamfahmy Před 5 lety +40

    Tom!, u r not just understanding mathematics.. U r talented in delevering the msg.. Thank you so much.. I need from you more videos about Taylor expansion, Lagrange multipliers, and more of special functions.. We know the names but it's all empty and easy to forget the second after the exam!,
    And again.. Thanks in advance

  • @anirbansen346
    @anirbansen346 Před 3 lety +8

    Though I'm a late viewer of your teaching, but it pushes me up to rethink mathematical stuff and helps to study various branches of Maths as well. An emphatic love and respect by my side from India.

  • @johannesCmayer
    @johannesCmayer Před 4 lety +13

    9:10 Sigma squared is the variance. Sigma is the standard deviation.

  • @hans170
    @hans170 Před 4 lety +3

    Amazing video. I hope you continue to make videos like this!

  • @financewithsom485
    @financewithsom485 Před 6 lety +184

    You look like a popstar man

  • @arts5852
    @arts5852 Před 4 lety +2

    Your manner of presentation is very cool. After watching your video I have finally understood what is it. Thank you very much 👍

  • @avtaras
    @avtaras Před 5 lety +3

    Amazing clarity! Thank you!

  • @allaccount3936
    @allaccount3936 Před 3 lety +9

    Great man, just great
    I have been trying to understand how the integration by parts was evaluated for the polynomial and exponential function in multiplication there in gamma function.
    But what's the name of the rule you talked about at 5:16
    Thanks you have been very helpful 😊

  • @amirhaziqrazak01
    @amirhaziqrazak01 Před 3 lety +8

    Thanks man, I didn't understand a thing when my lecturer taught me and suddenly boom! quiz tomorrow. This video literally save my ass

  • @ayadav4714
    @ayadav4714 Před 3 lety +1

    Great video tom. I greatly enjoy your videos. Thanks. Keep up the awesome.

  • @doodelay
    @doodelay Před 4 lety +9

    I had always heard of the gamma function but never knew what it was. Then one day I decided to plot factorial function on desmos and that crazy graph with monster asymptotes appeared lol so I had to come see with this was about, thanks for great video

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety +1

      Haha love the story - and you're very welcome.

    • @two697
      @two697 Před 2 lety +1

      I'm heard for the exact same reason

  • @AndyWicks
    @AndyWicks Před 5 lety +3

    Clear, complete and so well explained. Thank you. :-)

  • @mehranfarid7432
    @mehranfarid7432 Před rokem +1

    You are simply amazing, man. Immediate subscribe.

  • @cheknauss9867
    @cheknauss9867 Před 6 lety +8

    I thoroughly enjoyed this.

  •  Před 3 lety +1

    I admire your work. Thank you.

  • @austinhaider105
    @austinhaider105 Před 2 lety

    This video is incredibly helpful!! Thank you!

  • @rupadarshisamanta3288
    @rupadarshisamanta3288 Před 3 lety +9

    Rockstar mathematician!!
    Explanation is good✌️
    Wow man love from India 🇮🇳🙏🇮🇳

  • @jaidev2717
    @jaidev2717 Před 4 lety +37

    Hey, your explanation was amazing man. Keep it up. Love from India.

  • @juliettechiapello6544
    @juliettechiapello6544 Před 3 lety +2

    Thank you man ! It is clear now. Love from France.

  • @thermofluidsscience7164
    @thermofluidsscience7164 Před 4 lety +8

    Great video, thanks. Just a typo: In the bottom right graph from 3:20 to 7:30, the y-axis should be the gamma function and the x-axis should be x, the real argument of the gamma function.

  • @rekhameena2413
    @rekhameena2413 Před 5 lety +2

    It's amazing explanation sir!!

  • @Surviving_With_Nthangeniph

    i jst had to subscribe man you solved all my problems of gamma

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t Před 2 lety

    Great Professor ... Great. Especially the last part (distribution function).
    Thank you so much.
    Professor, please let me tell you something (maybe it's not important for you, but for me ...) :
    Most of the time I see, you're kneeling in front of chalkboard! It means a lot to me. Because and In my opinion, it shows how much you love Math and your work (actually your Hobby!). And also it shows, you're such modest person.
    Professor, you are such a real and great teacher.
    Thank you

  • @feixu1038
    @feixu1038 Před 6 lety +1

    Hi Tom, thanks for your clear math video sharing. I have a question here: around 5:10, you mention about a magnitude limit rule. Could you tell me the terminology of this rule? I'm not a native speaker and in many cases it's hard for me to link the English term to my language. Thanks a lot!

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 6 lety

      Thanks for the question - I think this page does a good job of explaining the idea calculus.seas.upenn.edu/?n=Main.OrdersOfGrowth

  • @tanmoydutta5846
    @tanmoydutta5846 Před 3 lety +3

    Quite nicely explained....love from India....keep up the good job👍👍👍👍

  • @drewh0208
    @drewh0208 Před 5 lety

    Great video! It was fun to listen to. But where were the complex numbers?

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 Před 3 lety +3

    I must say thank you
    I have these gamma beta functions in mathamatical physics which kind of made me confuced
    thank you for your explanation
    you actually helped me to start studying

  • @avenging209
    @avenging209 Před 5 lety +2

    U should become a math professor. You are way better at explaining ideas than so many math teachers i've had.

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 5 lety +3

      avenging209 that’s exactly what I do!

    • @jake_runs_the_world
      @jake_runs_the_world Před 5 lety +1

      lmao he's a tutor at St Hugh's College, University of Oxford..........

  • @mindy1835
    @mindy1835 Před 2 lety

    You are such a great teacher.

  • @prabhakargupta8765
    @prabhakargupta8765 Před 3 lety +1

    Good job man!
    I hope that you will became a successful man in math.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 Před 3 lety

      Just watch this impressive Math channel czcams.com/channels/ZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg.html

  • @doktorklaus300
    @doktorklaus300 Před 4 lety +3

    Great ! Thank you !

  • @pyrojackson9001
    @pyrojackson9001 Před rokem +1

    I have a question, or rather an idea to propose: wouldn't it be a lot easier to solve the integral for gamma of half with polar substitution rather than going all in with probability distribution?

  • @maikbanner7552
    @maikbanner7552 Před 5 lety +4

    The Gamma Function is Punkatortially Glamorous in this Tutorial.

  • @aaloksharma6274
    @aaloksharma6274 Před 2 lety +1

    Great video sir 👏

  • @Unparallel_roads23
    @Unparallel_roads23 Před 3 lety +1

    Very good explanation

  • @ahole5407
    @ahole5407 Před 2 lety +1

    could someone explain how this could be used to explain the forgotten index of the Fibonacci cube Gamma(n).

  • @frankguo1363
    @frankguo1363 Před 7 měsíci

    Great video Tom! Appreciate it! you explained the process of computation for the gamma function well. Why not discuss its significance a little bit? Like what it simplifies or reveal?

  • @enduranceoniegileoniso7904

    INCREDIBLE ACCENT. +100% CLARITY.

  • @057tanmaybhagwat2
    @057tanmaybhagwat2 Před 3 lety +1

    Nice video

  • @MsKisshello
    @MsKisshello Před 2 lety +1

    thanks!

  • @karthikuppati
    @karthikuppati Před 5 lety +2

    At 3:11 how do you draw the graph for the Gama function?

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 5 lety +2

      Hi Karthik, the graph I've drawn is the real part of the function (sorry I mis-labelled the axes) as the full graph gives you a two-dimensional surface. There's a nice plotting tool on Wolfram Mathworld which lets you play around with different values, I recommend trying it out: mathworld.wolfram.com/GammaFunction.html

  • @bekoesamuel7640
    @bekoesamuel7640 Před 5 lety +2

    Great explanation. Thank you!

  • @faus2417
    @faus2417 Před 6 lety +5

    i have a question, at 3:11 you mentioned that this graph shows the full extent of the gamma function but shouldn't that graph be three dimensional(rather than the 2 dimensions shown), you have a Re(z) and Im(z) axis but where is the F(Re(z)+Im(z)) axis ?

    • @teunvanwezel2282
      @teunvanwezel2282 Před 6 lety +5

      fau s I think the graph he shows here is a graph of gamma(x), so only for exclusively real numbers. I think he made a mistake here; the axes should be defined as x and y, not Re and Im. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_function

    • @massimoesposito7014
      @massimoesposito7014 Před 5 lety +1

      Good Boy! It is like that!

    • @chriswilliams1627
      @chriswilliams1627 Před 5 lety

      I'm pretty sure its a graph of the domain of gamma function on the Re and lm axes

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety +1

      Good spot Fau - the graph is indeed only for the real part of the function. The x-axis is the real part and the y-axis the value of the Gamma Function. My bad.

  • @aniketeuler6443
    @aniketeuler6443 Před 3 lety +2

    Sir you cleared my concept 😀

  • @user-gk7kv8oc8x
    @user-gk7kv8oc8x Před 3 lety

    Your explanation is the best, in spite my English being very bad, i understand it.

  • @mohamadalikardi73
    @mohamadalikardi73 Před 3 lety +1

    Love your way of explaining can I ask a favor? can you do a video on beta function?? I am currently studying it in my mathematics class and I found your method of explaining is
    easy to understand so thank you on the fun and informative video and can't wait for your reply

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 3 lety

      Thanks for the suggestion Muhammad, I'll add it to my list :)

  • @discreet_boson
    @discreet_boson Před 3 lety +1

    This channel is so underrated

  • @nehalkalita
    @nehalkalita Před rokem

    3:14 "Integral can be extended on the left side of the complex plane except for negative integers". I did not understand this part. Can anyone explain?
    When I look at this graph, I think I can see line plotted in negative quadrant.

  • @musicsubicandcebu1774
    @musicsubicandcebu1774 Před 5 lety +10

    If I understand correctly, root pi comes from the fact that the area under the bell curve = root 2pi . . . what's amazes me is that both e and pi are jointly involved in what can be considered the most powerful force in the universe - the law of averages...

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety

      Yes exactly. It's all coming from the Normal Distribution/Gaussian Curve. More info here: czcams.com/video/xp3J_uSYtD8/video.html

  • @noworries838
    @noworries838 Před 3 lety

    his intro killed everything

  • @Addhyan27
    @Addhyan27 Před rokem +1

    thank u so much sir for this video and i can safely say that i draw many analogies from bodybuilding to the branch of mathematics ..just like in body building all parts are trained and sculpted so do here every piece of mathematics must be understood well before constructing the bigger picture

  • @AvinashKumar-cz2yy
    @AvinashKumar-cz2yy Před 3 lety

    Please do a video on differentiation under the integral sign

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 2 lety +1

      will add it to my list - thanks for the suggestion!

  • @amansinghbhadauria2818
    @amansinghbhadauria2818 Před 5 lety +6

    This is how you break stereotypes. #RocksMath

  • @harshanilakmali2636
    @harshanilakmali2636 Před 3 lety +1

    Thank you

  • @samernoureddine
    @samernoureddine Před 5 lety

    Great video! I'd just like to point out that the denominator in phi(x) should contain sigma, not sigma squared

  • @denizaliduru3670
    @denizaliduru3670 Před 2 lety

    From all the math guys i saw you are the most "not math guy" looking guy and thats not a compliment.

  • @technoultimategaming2999

    I was playing around with a graph function f(x) = x! and f(a) = e^a and that they grow at the same rate eventually

  • @athul_c1375
    @athul_c1375 Před 3 lety

    can any one recommend a text book that I can study this

  • @kummer45
    @kummer45 Před 2 lety

    Can anyone tell me where this Gamma function comes from? I've read about it, studied with Z being a complex variable and read the history but no one can tell me where this function happened or in what circumstances these mathematicians found it.
    Please if anyone. I'm curious.

  • @tawfiqueihsan9844
    @tawfiqueihsan9844 Před 3 lety +1

    Thanks man.

  • @jonmoore8995
    @jonmoore8995 Před 3 lety

    I very much appreciate, if you could do a derivation of the normal distribution, that would be great.

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 3 lety

      I discuss it here in fact: czcams.com/video/xp3J_uSYtD8/video.html

  • @thewierdragonbaby4843
    @thewierdragonbaby4843 Před 2 lety

    I wish I could understand what it means to have an integral from a to b. I want to know how to calculate 0.25! but I don't understand integrals and it will take ages to understand it by just researching it.

  • @benradick1489
    @benradick1489 Před 3 lety

    Awesome!

  • @alexting827
    @alexting827 Před 5 lety +1

    Exponential Integral Gamma function??

  • @vinitha3237
    @vinitha3237 Před 2 lety

    The value of √(1/2)= ? a)1/2 b)√π c)√π/2 d)1 .I was asked this question in a test. We don't know the answer,so we asked our teacher ,he said the answer by looking the gamma function in the book where Gamma (1/2)=√π was in the book. I have a doubt that is gamma and root are same?

  • @shivakumarnavala2603
    @shivakumarnavala2603 Před 5 lety

    you explained gamma function for positive integer(n)...please explain for negtive integers(-n)..

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety

      The same integral formula will work for any value of n.

  • @jamesvillanueva8717
    @jamesvillanueva8717 Před 6 lety +2

    Nice video! :) at 9:13 don't you mean sigma squared should be variance and standard dev should just be sigma?

  • @avinashk4750
    @avinashk4750 Před 2 lety

    Is it arithmetic progression

  • @Someone-cr8cj
    @Someone-cr8cj Před 4 lety

    oh, that guy.

  • @HardikPatel-re9wz
    @HardikPatel-re9wz Před 6 lety +2

    Genius

  • @evenprime1658
    @evenprime1658 Před 4 lety

    Is there way to find a number if you are given only its factorial with some inverse gamma function?? Its really bothering me.. i need answers!!!

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety +1

      I think this might be what you're looking for: mathoverflow.net/questions/12828/inverse-gamma-function

    • @evenprime1658
      @evenprime1658 Před 4 lety

      @@TomRocksMaths Perfect .. thanks!

  • @lichen2354
    @lichen2354 Před 4 lety +11

    so useful to me, everything's great! except the side camera's resolution...

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 4 lety +3

      Thanks Li - fortunately I now have a new camera so my latest videos should be much clearer :)

  • @silvadossantos6803
    @silvadossantos6803 Před 3 lety

    Thank you , could you cover beta-gamma relationship?

  • @rafiqbodalal6358
    @rafiqbodalal6358 Před 6 lety +1

    I have a question that I hope you can answer. During my studies of the gamma function, I came across a relation known as the "Stirling's Factorial Approximation." The equation is commonly used to calculate the value of gamma(p) when p is very large. Anyway, when choosing a value of p like 450,000 and substituted that into the equation, I always obtained a value of zero, even though the gamma value at p=450,000 exists. I later discovered that in the equation there was an exponential factor raised to the power of -p. We know that exp(-p) =0 when p>>0. How can the equation have got this wrong? Or is there something I am missing. Big fan of your channel! Thanks in advance :)

    • @thomascrawford1407
      @thomascrawford1407 Před 6 lety +2

      Hi Rafiq, thanks for your question. The value of gamma at p=450,000 is actually really large (I got the answer 10^(10^6.370792540767548)). You're right that the exponential function would make such a term small, but if you look carefully at the integral definition, the exponential is actually unchanged no matter which value of gamma that you are calculating. It is an exp(-x) term, where z is the variable in the gamma function. This is why the gamma function will tend to infinity as the input variable tends to infinity.

    • @rafiqbodalal6358
      @rafiqbodalal6358 Před 6 lety +1

      Thanks for the swift response. I understand what you're trying to say. The integral definition of the gamma function does indeed have an exponential term that is independent of the gamma function variable "z." But if you recall, my question was concerning the Sterling's Approximation Formula. Here is the equation, perhaps you can calculate the value differently:
      gamma(z+1)=z!=(sqrt[2*pi*z])*(z^z)*(exp[-z])

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 6 lety +2

      Apologies I overlooked the fact that you were referring to the approximation, rather than the integral definition. Using the approximation formula as you have given above, the answer will still be very large. Again, I tried inputting your value of 450,000 into the formula on wolfram alpha and obtained 10^(10^6.370793586177315), which is a very close approximation to the answer I obtained above for the exact gamma function. The reason the function continues to increase is due to the z^z term. You are correct that the exponential term exp(-z) will quickly descend to zero for large z, however, the z^z term is also an exponential function. In fact, it will dominate the exponential term for any z>e. To see this, substitute in the value z=e. The z^z term then cancels exactly with the exp(-z) term, leaving only (sqrt[2*pi*z]). Furthermore, if you rearrange the formula by grouping the exponential terms together you have:
      gamma(z+1)=z!=(sqrt[2*pi*z])*(z/e)^z
      Now, hopefully it is clearer that as z tends to infinity, and in particular for z>e, the exponential term to the power z will increase very quickly towards infinity also. Hope that clears it up!

    • @rafiqbodalal6358
      @rafiqbodalal6358 Před 6 lety +2

      Got it. Thank you very much for the explanation. Sorry if I made you tired with my question. :)

    • @TomRocksMaths
      @TomRocksMaths  Před 6 lety +2

      No problem!

  • @sdsa007
    @sdsa007 Před 2 lety

    This is great stuff!!!!!!! I spent so much time learning Gamma from video lectures... I continue to seek intuition on the integral form.... I think the gamma function is actually fits best on a 3D plot... on a 2D plot its mostly depicted as a Real vs Real 2D map.. in other words, I think the 2D map is wrong.... and to make it right we gotta replace Imaginary with Real, and imagine the Imaginary dimension extending into and out of the blackboard! Blackboads are soooo outdated!

  • @eswnl1
    @eswnl1 Před 3 lety +1

    I had to remind myself that when doing gamma(1/2), its not (1/2)! But then to work out what (1/2)! is, you need to calculate gamma(3/2) which is equivalent to 1/2 x gamma(1/2). That is 1/2 x root pi.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 Před 3 lety

      Just watch this impressive Math channel czcams.com/channels/ZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg.html

  • @michaellong7934
    @michaellong7934 Před 3 lety

    I’m struggling with the u=√x how is it dx=x^1/2(2) I’m getting x^-1/2 (2)

    • @rayannoor8264
      @rayannoor8264 Před 2 lety +1

      When you divide both sides with what was multiple to du the half becomes 2 and the negative sign changes to positive

  • @Mathemarius
    @Mathemarius Před 3 lety

    03:03 Actually this graph shows the gamma function for real values only (you say almost any value for all complex numbers at 03:10)!

  • @musicincorporate3309
    @musicincorporate3309 Před 6 lety +2

    wasn't it root pie over 2 though??

    • @thomascrawford1407
      @thomascrawford1407 Před 6 lety

      I'm not sure exactly which part you mean, but the 2 that appears inside the integral after the substitution cancels out with the 1/2 factor to just give root pi.

    • @shaun7583
      @shaun7583 Před 6 lety +2

      Music Incorporate I heard it was sqrt(pi)/2 as well.

    • @jainilshah6712
      @jainilshah6712 Před 6 lety +2

      No, the factorial of 1/2 is root pi over two.
      The gamma value of 1/2 is root pi

    • @emmauddin2515
      @emmauddin2515 Před 5 lety

      @@jainilshah6712 dose that mean that the factorial of -1/2 is root pi?

  • @antwanwimberly1729
    @antwanwimberly1729 Před 2 lety

    That’s interesting. N-1!

  • @advaykumar9726
    @advaykumar9726 Před 2 lety

    You said in factorial you multiply all whole numbers less or equal but it must be natural numbers

  • @sdsa007
    @sdsa007 Před rokem

    I was upset because the cheetah t-shirt was blocking the equations, which should have been tattooed on your body or silk-screened on the cheetah t-shirt... why is there not a Gamma day?! That would be Factorial!... just kidding I'm not upset, nice video, very concise, which means I didn't get lost in the details!

  • @SuneelKumar-pw1id
    @SuneelKumar-pw1id Před 3 lety +2

    You make esay gamma function for me
    thanks

  • @imfine...7486
    @imfine...7486 Před 4 měsíci

    Hi your content is so good ... informative and easily understanding... But just improve the quality of the camera and only one the front view is sufficient don't move the camera view it diverts the focus... Please ...

  • @confibuzz
    @confibuzz Před 6 lety +6

    I understand the basics of the gamma and the basics of factorials now. Thank you! I loved this. Something to add to my 10 year old brain...

    • @mike4ty4
      @mike4ty4 Před 6 lety

      What's wrong with being a nerdboy eh?

    • @DevrimOdabas
      @DevrimOdabas Před 5 lety

      ​@@egeerkut9602 hehe bence adamın kastetmek istediği yaşının 10 olduğu değil mütevazilik yapmaya çalışmış ama olmayadabilir xd

    • @potatoman8763
      @potatoman8763 Před 5 lety

      Nobody cares how old you are

    • @ganondorfchampin
      @ganondorfchampin Před 5 lety +2

      Sounds like a bunch of people in the comments are jealous.

  • @Viveksh18
    @Viveksh18 Před rokem

    Love from India😍😍😍

  • @tamilselvanrascal5956
    @tamilselvanrascal5956 Před 2 měsíci

    🎉🎉🎉

  • @flip2029
    @flip2029 Před 3 lety +6

    Lol im 16 and I'm watching this for fun.

    • @ldotbenner
      @ldotbenner Před 3 lety

      Lol I'm 16 and I'm watching this because I picked the worst possible IB math IA topic :')

    • @flip2029
      @flip2029 Před 3 lety

      @@ldotbenner lol i take the IB too lmao AA HL

    • @ldotbenner
      @ldotbenner Před 3 lety

      @@flip2029 same class! I'm dying lol

  • @sharvilpatel1651
    @sharvilpatel1651 Před rokem +1

    Hi

  • @gourav1163
    @gourav1163 Před 4 lety +2

    If you become our teacher ......Girls will attend your every class

  • @nolan412
    @nolan412 Před 3 lety

    CZcams stalls on the crazy eyes at 10:29.

  • @sundaranarasimhan5331
    @sundaranarasimhan5331 Před 4 lety

    The graph at 3:03 does not make any sense, because the axis are labelled wrongly.
    I guess you wanted to show us the Gamma function restricted to the real line.

    • @tomjeffered1668
      @tomjeffered1668 Před 3 lety

      Just watch this impressive Math channel czcams.com/channels/ZDkxpcvd-T1uR65Feuj5Yg.html

  • @himdhiman3796
    @himdhiman3796 Před 4 lety +1

    love from india

  • @shivanishukla1558
    @shivanishukla1558 Před 5 lety +1

    Sir I like your vedios ,can u tell me that what is your country???.please