Agreed. Definitely not “affordable”. Plenty of way cheaper options. However, it does look like a great option for a full featured lighter weight and smaller in size “all rounder” A better video title might have been “Powerful Small All-Rounder Camera”.
The title should be switched to cheaper, or more budget friendly. A budget friendly plane may be 200k, but that isnt the same as affordable even though planes are millions normally
@@hermanzhang6494 just buy yourself a 10 year old full frame DSLR. Cameras aren't like smart phones. The technological advancements of cameras aren't that fast
Great idea. I’ve bought all my instruments used, except for one of my saxes. You can get absolute steals if you’re willing to make a 3-hour drive or pay for shipping.
Used gear is awesome. Like you say, many people buy these things and just let them collect dust. Unless you're buying retired gear from professional photographers, every used lens and body I've purchased has been practically unused.
@@thomasmacdonough288 Not to mention manufacturer refurbished gear! I got a refurbished canon rp for 600$ from canon with a warranty when I got it, it was like new
For a 6K camera, 1700 is ridiculously cheap compared to other 6K cameras, if you really want a bang for ur buck though I’d recommend a lumix g7, resells around 400, shoots in 4K, does the job
@@heymynameangel well, the X-S20 is 1500 and does 6K open gate as well and has a viewfinder, mechanical shutter, with the only "disadvantage" being it's APS-C. If this thing had a viewfinder I think it would be more appealing.
@@jjOnceAgain thats complete bs. They are by far not in the 3-5k. Its 2-3k and under 2k if you get a good deal or cash back. Smth sony and fuji do a lot
I'm seeing so many comments justifying the price tag for this camera, and while I think it is a powerful camera I cannot agree with the affordable part. I think the title was originally "An Affordable full-frame camera" for this short, which is now changed to "Affordable 6k video camera" to make it more sense (though I could be wrong, so sorry if my memory is incorrect Tom). But as there's already an actual affordable (and newly made) full-frame camera - Nikon Z5 - I still can't agree with "one of the most affordable full-frame camera" part. currently $821.99 on amazon for body-only, and Nikon made it much more content camera after years-long software updates. It does suck at video part, but 1080p wise it's still decent. For video part, other than I don't get the obsession with 'full-frame' tag, I don't think it's even a good budget video camera when there's severe recording limits (6k 10min, 4k 15min, fhd 20min??), no viewfinder, no hotshoe, no anti-flickering, suffering from rolling shutter. I would go with new APS-C (super 35mm) cameras which are a lot more affordable than the full-frame (and more variety as well), Panasonic S5 which is full-frame currently under $1200 (body) with lot more features. And then there's a wide world of well-used cameras. But what do I know? According to many comments in this section I'm hopelessly broke when I don't find this camera attractive for it's price tag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@icedcocoa01 that is because you don't know the difference between a full-frame camera and an iphone. For a semi-professional camera, $1.7k is amazing pricing.
This camera is $1500 USD it's not affordable when you consider how little you get for your money. You can get a used EOS R5 or R6mkII for around $2000 and get way more value for your money.
Canon R7 or Sony FX30 would be wayyyyy better especially if you want to shoot video lot more support and lenses better af just as many codec options more flexibility or if you want full frame there’s the R8 and these are all the brand new options maybe if it was priced more accordingly like say 1k maybe 1,100$ but for 1500-1700$ it just doesn’t make any sense imo
No hot shoe, no viewfinder, 6.2k for ten minutes, 4k for 20 minutes, poor controls, no audio out, pancake lens only with manual focus and aperture of F8. 1500 for a body only Good luck with that 😂
Yes its expensive for a camera, but it's already been pointed out by many people that it is considered affordable COMPARED to other cameras of its type. And, for the people its i.e. content creators, its great. Film in the average 16:9 aspect ratio, then crop to whatever you need for shortform content, or 9:16. It also debuts a few new streamlined editing features. What im getting at is that its cheap AND competitive for the people shopping for this kind of camera
This camera is trash. You have 10 min record limit that's pretty much useless. You're better off making videos with your phone and saving up your money for a real camera. For Photography we'll see how the AF works when the non-sponsored reviewers get to test it.
@@jaysonva4256 I tried it the other day and it’s not good for anything you’d get paid for. It’s good for street stuff with a 24 or 35 mil but other than that, the AF doesn’t track well, I get banding under LED lightings, and the readout is slow so when taking pictures of folks playing soccer or volleyball, the ball or arms will warp. The cam isn’t good enough for its specs. Also, why is there no grip??? It’s like a phone with a lens mount
A second hand a7r ii is more affordable still, yet has twice the resolution, 4k, pdaf, ibis... All of that in 2015, currently for half the price on ebay. A steal.
Apsc battery, 4k30 at 100mbps 8bit, no open gate,no 4k60, 4k is also from a lineskip variant,blurry fhd, pre a7iii/a6400 colors, ibis issues ( like the a7ii ), bad low light performance ( 1-1,5 stop worse )
@@tonkatsu9907 there’s no electronics that allow anything you may place in the slot to communicate with the camera, thus by definition makes it a “cold shoe”
How does Panasonic go from inventing the first camcorder with image stabilization to forgetting about adding contacts to a 1,000$+ camera’s shoe so you can use Speedlites? At least, they could’ve put an additional connection in the shoe so you could use some accessories they made like a viewfinder or a microphone, like the Sony Multi Interface Shoe
@@bryan3am With a rolling shutter sensor and no mechanical shutter, it's not going to compete with any of those either. X100 has an F2 lens whereas this camera has no lens that small and bright. Bruh you just looked at the physical dimensions and thought "oh a competitor!" without taking ANY other factors into account? 💀
@@bryan3am if you want to compete with fujifilm and leica, missing an EVF is a big discouragement for photographers. With this price I would at least want a EVF. All I can say is that’s a Ricoh with video features and bigger sensor… lol such a stupid decision for Panasonic
Really interesting point with the aspect ratio, that’s pretty cool. Not something I’d have thought of as a plus, but actually very useful in a time where content has to be posted in different aspect ratios for various platforms/content types.
The CZcams algorithm is the devil because now I'm curious to buy this lol, those samples look stunning! Never seen your videos before or any camera-related vids in general, just gonna have a quick look around the channel!
I agree not cheap , i don’t know what other brand or models run for that probably support what this does as well . If I had to guess it’s touristy cheaper than the alternatives
I feel like I’m not trusting a lot of new companies except Sony canon or Nikon. I think that one of them with a good lens is basically all you need instead of a bunch of small artisan cameras. It does look quite nice though.
Full frame and all that in such a small camera? OMFG! 🤯 I used to be really interested in cameras some years ago but left that hobbie around 2019, technology has come so far
@@phin1871 Still a waste of money. It's bad for video because it's got a 15min recording limit, and it's bad for stills because it doesn't even have a mechanical shutter despite using a slow sensor. You'll get rolling shutter on anything that moves.
I feel like people saying $1500 is unaffordable when Canons newest video camera goes for $6000+. Ill definitely be buying this camera especially with best buys 12 month 0 interest financing
Of course it is a substantial amount of money, but there are very few cameras with this kind of specs. Not every camera has open gate at 6.2k on a full frame sensor. There are other options, and the one that seems the most comparable is the sigma fp.
Yes it is. Full-frame cameras are usually $3-5k. It's very cheap within the category. It's like saying a $30k sports car. Can you find cheaper cars? Yes, but it's an affordable car in it's category
I hate living in Brazil cause there’s a lot of products they don’t sell here, so I search for this model and google show me the Sony ZV, yeah Google almost the same
The S5 II doesn't cost that much more either. I don't understand the hype from many CZcamsrs about the S9. 15 or 10 minutes shooting limit, no viewfinder and an F8 pancake without autofocus. I don't understand Panasonic. A Gx9 II would have made much more sense. But the photography world is simply clamouring for the so-called full-frame format, which in reality is a 35 mm format.
@@jjOnceAgain this is like the 5th time you ever copy pasted this comment with wrong information. Full frame cameras (brand new) start at 1200 bucks. If we’re talking used in new condition with less than 4 hours of use time, they start at around 800 bucks
@kylejenkins5050 Don't compare used cameras to new ones. Fujifilm's GFX50S is $3k, Sony A7 iv is $2.2k, Nikon's Z 8 is $3.5k, and Cannon's R5 is $3k. A $1,700 camera is extremely affordable in it's category
@@jjOnceAgain Right but those cameras blow this out the water they aren't in the same bracket. This costs the same as an s5ii in some regions. It's a fine camera but it's style over substance. It's for people that want a cool camera not for budget minded people.
A hybrid viewfinder would make this camera very popular but without, a forgotten piece of tech in 5 years. Sorry panasonic but you don't understand the game.
@@soprolakido Then it's a false equivalence. $1400 is an affordable price, for a new full frame camera. That's like someone going "this brand new sports car is affordable" and you go "No, because if you buy a used 2008 car its cheaper"
Lol people keep crying about one word the guy said. For over 90% of us, this (photography/videography with a camera) is a luxury, not a necessity, so being affordable should be put in context when compared with other recent full frame cameras that offer similar features out there. It will not be affordable when the buyers can’t even consider other options.
Frame of reference for Photography CZcamsrs. Anything over $600 is not considered "affordable" by anyone making under $200,000 a year, which is 99% of people.
@@kris4637 You missed my point: all the LUT he showed on this video looked very teal&orange. All of them... so, honestly people are abusing that kind of filtering.
I hate this shit. CHOOSE your words carefully. I watched this and was like "damn, if it's affordable maybe I'll check it out, I've been looking for a good video camera and this looks great"....I checked the comments and this is mad expensive. There's nothing affordable about it at all, how out of touch with reality and the economy are these people???
@@VideoGameBoxReviews Hey bro, I mean this new camera w/o mechanic shutter, no hot shoes, no EVF, no small & compact lens to choose from (that MF 26mm F8 is a joke), recording limit (even in FHD), plastic body (no weather sealing) and it charged for 1500$
Looks can be deceiving, to many compromisers for non real gain, as the lens options you either go with the new get lens, which awful or put a larger lens on it and you loose all the advantage of compact size, not to mention what else they have left out to achieve the size, I do wonder who will buy it?
I never trust when a CZcamsr says "affordable". Most CZcamsrs are so out of touch with reality.
He mean affordable in comparison to the other 6k cameras
Agreed. Definitely not “affordable”. Plenty of way cheaper options.
However, it does look like a great option for a full featured lighter weight and smaller in size “all rounder”
A better video title might have been “Powerful Small All-Rounder Camera”.
Agreed
The title should be switched to cheaper, or more budget friendly. A budget friendly plane may be 200k, but that isnt the same as affordable even though planes are millions normally
Considering a lot of cameras are around the 3k-5k price range I think this is decent
1500$
What a world we live in where it's considered affordable
Already very cheap compared to other full frame cameras
@@hermanzhang6494 just buy yourself a 10 year old full frame DSLR. Cameras aren't like smart phones. The technological advancements of cameras aren't that fast
This is very cheap compare to sony
Everything is relative.
Is $1500 at lot of money? Absolutely!
But is $1500 a lot of money for a full-frame camera? Absolutely not!
@@TomCalton Yeah, but where's the affordability part?
I will buy it used, from people that bought on credit but never end up using the camera, so to recoup loss they listed it on eBay.
This, best way to buy gear shit is too expensive these days and why pay the depreciation tax
Great idea. I’ve bought all my instruments used, except for one of my saxes. You can get absolute steals if you’re willing to make a 3-hour drive or pay for shipping.
Used gear is awesome. Like you say, many people buy these things and just let them collect dust. Unless you're buying retired gear from professional photographers, every used lens and body I've purchased has been practically unused.
@@thomasmacdonough288 Not to mention manufacturer refurbished gear! I got a refurbished canon rp for 600$ from canon with a warranty when I got it, it was like new
Sir this cost $1,700 nothing cheap here
For a 6K camera, 1700 is ridiculously cheap compared to other 6K cameras, if you really want a bang for ur buck though I’d recommend a lumix g7, resells around 400, shoots in 4K, does the job
@@heymynameangel well, the X-S20 is 1500 and does 6K open gate as well and has a viewfinder, mechanical shutter, with the only "disadvantage" being it's APS-C. If this thing had a viewfinder I think it would be more appealing.
@@lucadipaolo1997 true that, thats also a very good alternative! forgot all about that camera lol
Cheap af for a full frame
bruh who are these people why dont you buy me a 1cm choclate for 1k
This guy is determined to make his YT channel grow big and it doesn't matter where, when and how the viewer wastes their money.
BINGO! You finally got it, now multiple that by 1000 and you have Camera/Video CZcams
Affordable? Since when is £1.799,99 affordable??
For a full frame camera, it's a good price. They're usually around $3-5k
@@jjOnceAgain thats complete bs. They are by far not in the 3-5k. Its 2-3k and under 2k if you get a good deal or cash back. Smth sony and fuji do a lot
@@ziks4103 so it's still cheaper than that. Nikon Z9 is $6k, Nikon Z7 is $2.5k, Cannon R5 is $2.9k.... so the $1.7k is affordable in it's class
I'm seeing so many comments justifying the price tag for this camera, and while I think it is a powerful camera I cannot agree with the affordable part.
I think the title was originally "An Affordable full-frame camera" for this short, which is now changed to "Affordable 6k video camera" to make it more sense (though I could be wrong, so sorry if my memory is incorrect Tom). But as there's already an actual affordable (and newly made) full-frame camera - Nikon Z5 - I still can't agree with "one of the most affordable full-frame camera" part. currently $821.99 on amazon for body-only, and Nikon made it much more content camera after years-long software updates. It does suck at video part, but 1080p wise it's still decent.
For video part, other than I don't get the obsession with 'full-frame' tag, I don't think it's even a good budget video camera when there's severe recording limits (6k 10min, 4k 15min, fhd 20min??), no viewfinder, no hotshoe, no anti-flickering, suffering from rolling shutter. I would go with new APS-C (super 35mm) cameras which are a lot more affordable than the full-frame (and more variety as well), Panasonic S5 which is full-frame currently under $1200 (body) with lot more features. And then there's a wide world of well-used cameras.
But what do I know? According to many comments in this section I'm hopelessly broke when I don't find this camera attractive for it's price tag. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@icedcocoa01 that is because you don't know the difference between a full-frame camera and an iphone. For a semi-professional camera, $1.7k is amazing pricing.
This camera is $1500 USD it's not affordable when you consider how little you get for your money. You can get a used EOS R5 or R6mkII for around $2000 and get way more value for your money.
1500 is less than 2000. It's more affordable
or a sigma fp for the same price, or a nikon z5 for 700$ , or a sony a7ii for 1000$
Canon R7 or Sony FX30 would be wayyyyy better especially if you want to shoot video lot more support and lenses better af just as many codec options more flexibility or if you want full frame there’s the R8 and these are all the brand new options maybe if it was priced more accordingly like say 1k maybe 1,100$ but for 1500-1700$ it just doesn’t make any sense imo
Used vs new
No hot shoe, no viewfinder, 6.2k for ten minutes, 4k for 20 minutes, poor controls, no audio out, pancake lens only with manual focus and aperture of F8.
1500 for a body only
Good luck with that 😂
No mechanical shutter for photo😅😅
Yeah, all those youtubers are bought and sold.
They`re making commercials.
That lens is really worthless.
if it was 300 or less it would be worth it just to have a travel full frame camera
@@Zack-xz1ph For 300 i would buy it right now.
I do like the looks.
Sheesh f8 is rough. It’s also 30fps
Yes its expensive for a camera, but it's already been pointed out by many people that it is considered affordable COMPARED to other cameras of its type. And, for the people its i.e. content creators, its great. Film in the average 16:9 aspect ratio, then crop to whatever you need for shortform content, or 9:16. It also debuts a few new streamlined editing features. What im getting at is that its cheap AND competitive for the people shopping for this kind of camera
This camera is trash. You have 10 min record limit that's pretty much useless. You're better off making videos with your phone and saving up your money for a real camera. For Photography we'll see how the AF works when the non-sponsored reviewers get to test it.
Has no mechanical shutter so I doubt photography will be better
@@jaysonva4256 I tried it the other day and it’s not good for anything you’d get paid for. It’s good for street stuff with a 24 or 35 mil but other than that, the AF doesn’t track well, I get banding under LED lightings, and the readout is slow so when taking pictures of folks playing soccer or volleyball, the ball or arms will warp. The cam isn’t good enough for its specs. Also, why is there no grip??? It’s like a phone with a lens mount
A second hand a7r ii is more affordable still, yet has twice the resolution, 4k, pdaf, ibis... All of that in 2015, currently for half the price on ebay. A steal.
Funny that you say that because I literally just bought an a7rii. Great camera!
@@colbyfinnigsmier933 same I just bought my a7rii it’s a lovely camera!
Wait,the s9 is not stabilized?
Apsc battery, 4k30 at 100mbps 8bit, no open gate,no 4k60, 4k is also from a lineskip variant,blurry fhd, pre a7iii/a6400 colors, ibis issues ( like the a7ii ), bad low light performance ( 1-1,5 stop worse )
@@JJARCHIE Will you elaborate a bit on that please?
I'd probably let it age for 2-3 years and then purchase it when the price can be anywhere between 15-30% less by then (used condi of course).
My cousin made night vision out of these. Surprisingly good
😂 everything is affordable, depending on whom you ask.
Cropping doesn't make the shot anamorphic. Still looks like a nice small camera
Panasonic forgot the hotshoe :(
the hot shoe is right there?
@@tonkatsu9907 the S9 has a cold shoe.
@@tonkatsu9907 there’s no electronics that allow anything you may place in the slot to communicate with the camera, thus by definition makes it a “cold shoe”
@@tonkatsu9907 no, it’s a cold shoe
How does Panasonic go from inventing the first camcorder with image stabilization to forgetting about adding contacts to a 1,000$+ camera’s shoe so you can use Speedlites? At least, they could’ve put an additional connection in the shoe so you could use some accessories they made like a viewfinder or a microphone, like the Sony Multi Interface Shoe
Canon RP is full frame at half the price...
I think the selling point to this camera is mostly the size. An alternative to Leica's Q line or Fuji's X100 line.
@@bryan3am With a rolling shutter sensor and no mechanical shutter, it's not going to compete with any of those either. X100 has an F2 lens whereas this camera has no lens that small and bright. Bruh you just looked at the physical dimensions and thought "oh a competitor!" without taking ANY other factors into account? 💀
Nikon Z5 > Canon RP
@@bryan3am if you want to compete with fujifilm and leica, missing an EVF is a big discouragement for photographers. With this price I would at least want a EVF. All I can say is that’s a Ricoh with video features and bigger sensor… lol such a stupid decision for Panasonic
@@fotografalexandernikolistbf this seems to be exactly what Panasonic did when maki g this thing
Yeah. Nah. Crippled a bit too much to achieve the size. Also isn't the Z5 cheaper? And soooo much better?
It’s over a thousand dollars, bro, that ain’t affordable
You might as well just buy a second hand sony a7 III and a lens for the same price 🤣
@@neyfarias23 the sony a7 III is over 2k euros where i live
dawg its a quality camera, other 6k cameras sell for 3k+ , it damn near cut the traditional price in half which makes it more affordable .. wat
Really interesting point with the aspect ratio, that’s pretty cool. Not something I’d have thought of as a plus, but actually very useful in a time where content has to be posted in different aspect ratios for various platforms/content types.
Buyest review. 15 minutes max recording in 4K LMAO, are we back 10 years ago Pana ?
Someone at Panasonic HQ saw the Nikon Zf with the color leather and boxy design and was like "We need that as well" 😅
Ngl, I got Zf vibes when they announced the colourways too
@@TomCalton Just no EVF, so you're stuck with the toirist-taking photos-with-phone stance 😂
Panasonic did multiple colour options for the GM1 and GM5 about a decade ago.
The CZcams algorithm is the devil because now I'm curious to buy this lol, those samples look stunning! Never seen your videos before or any camera-related vids in general, just gonna have a quick look around the channel!
It’s cool but no EVF is a dealbreaker for me and I’m assuming most others in the market for a FF camera body.
Isn't it the z5 that's the cheapest new?
What were Panasonic executives thinking when they implemented a cold shoe for this
No hot-shoe, no deal.
I agree not cheap , i don’t know what other brand or models run for that probably support what this does as well .
If I had to guess it’s touristy cheaper than the alternatives
The most affordable mirror less full frame would be a canon RP.
Nop! Nikon Z5 > Canon RP
@@michelecintramika8482 Canon RP usually sells for $600 refurbed from Canon
I feel like I’m not trusting a lot of new companies except Sony canon or Nikon. I think that one of them with a good lens is basically all you need instead of a bunch of small artisan cameras. It does look quite nice though.
I think it’s versatile than Leica Q Series.
3:2 it’s the most used aspect on cinema cameras sensors …
Full frame and all that in such a small camera? OMFG! 🤯
I used to be really interested in cameras some years ago but left that hobbie around 2019, technology has come so far
Reminds me of the Sony a7c I feel as if cameras are going for smaller bodies on purpose
I picked up a 5dmk3 for $500 the other day :) awesome full frame dslr
Great camera 😮
I bought a fz1000 in like 2018 which was great
I was exited to see affordable. Then I googled it and its $1,799.99 as of mid 2024. You gotta be kidding.
I really wish it has a view finder.
Thank you for sharing this nice video, which lens I could use it ? Canon or Nikon ?
You can buy an s5 IIX at the same price bracket and it’ll do the same and better
Full frame, 10bit, Open gate is actually impressive compared to more expensive cameras
3:2/3:3 aspect ratio, my beloved
lol this camera is not affordable. Is almost about 2000€
Affordable FULL FRAME camera.
@@phin1871there are many cheaper full frame cameras buddy
Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k
@@phin1871 Still a waste of money. It's bad for video because it's got a 15min recording limit, and it's bad for stills because it doesn't even have a mechanical shutter despite using a slow sensor. You'll get rolling shutter on anything that moves.
All my hopes burnt to ashes after opening comment section 🙂 you guys saved my time
I feel like people saying $1500 is unaffordable when Canons newest video camera goes for $6000+. Ill definitely be buying this camera especially with best buys 12 month 0 interest financing
$2000 isn’t affordable.
Of course it is a substantial amount of money, but there are very few cameras with this kind of specs. Not every camera has open gate at 6.2k on a full frame sensor. There are other options, and the one that seems the most comparable is the sigma fp.
Yes it is. Full-frame cameras are usually $3-5k. It's very cheap within the category. It's like saying a $30k sports car. Can you find cheaper cars? Yes, but it's an affordable car in it's category
@@jjOnceAgain totally, I think "value" would be a more adequate word than cheap 🤝
@@maximedelpech7217 he says "affordable". The definition of "affordable" is literally "reasonably price"
Waiting for iPhone fan boys to say that they still prefer the iPhone as their primary camera.
If you don’t eat a Big Mac everyday for 284 days you will be able to afford this
I hate living in Brazil cause there’s a lot of products they don’t sell here, so I search for this model and google show me the Sony ZV, yeah Google almost the same
where is the grip
In Malaysia, it is sold at around RM7,400 - RM7,900 @ around USD1,614. Not really affordable for commoners.
It's more expensive than many full frame canon mirrorless cameras
The cripple hammer hit harder than cannon this time
The S5 II doesn't cost that much more either. I don't understand the hype from many CZcamsrs about the S9. 15 or 10 minutes shooting limit, no viewfinder and an F8 pancake without autofocus. I don't understand Panasonic. A Gx9 II would have made much more sense. But the photography world is simply clamouring for the so-called full-frame format, which in reality is a 35 mm format.
Considered getting rid of my X100V for this but the lack of mechanical shutter is making me doubt.
The v is better
@@tolgaygulec Nop!
Affordable? Just looked it up, its $1700
Full frame cameras are usually $3-5k
@@jjOnceAgain this is like the 5th time you ever copy pasted this comment with wrong information. Full frame cameras (brand new) start at 1200 bucks. If we’re talking used in new condition with less than 4 hours of use time, they start at around 800 bucks
@@jjOnceAgainYou can grab a Nikon Z5 right now for $860 new, please stop spamming this comment
@kylejenkins5050 Don't compare used cameras to new ones. Fujifilm's GFX50S is $3k, Sony A7 iv is $2.2k, Nikon's Z 8 is $3.5k, and Cannon's R5 is $3k. A $1,700 camera is extremely affordable in it's category
@@jjOnceAgain Right but those cameras blow this out the water they aren't in the same bracket. This costs the same as an s5ii in some regions. It's a fine camera but it's style over substance. It's for people that want a cool camera not for budget minded people.
Is it more affordable than a Canon RP?
I see people saying numbers that get close to 2000 here, but to Brazil... It's R$16k (Help me)
A hybrid viewfinder would make this camera very popular but without, a forgotten piece of tech in 5 years. Sorry panasonic but you don't understand the game.
affordable is used a7 with 11k shutter for 450 eur
Yeah, where are you finding that price? Because New, the A7 costs nearly the same price
@@jjOnceAgain you cant buy new a7, they are discontinued
@@soprolakido Then it's a false equivalence. $1400 is an affordable price, for a new full frame camera. That's like someone going "this brand new sports car is affordable" and you go "No, because if you buy a used 2008 car its cheaper"
@@jjOnceAgain but you can buy a7iii new for 1500 eur or a7c
@@soprolakido $1.4k is still cheaper
That's 1.7K... affordable?
For a full frame camera, yes it's affordable.
Isn't 3:2 more traditional than 16:9, since 35mm full frame is historically 3:2?
It’s just 6k, not 6.2
What an idiot- you're absolutely right, my apologies! Not sure where I got the extra .2k from!? Thank you for correcting me!
@@TomCalton hahaha rofl
"Affordable" will vary according to income....or available funds.....
I am waiting for my new Ricoh CX3
The S9 is the camera (final straw) that broke the CZcams reviewer’s (camel’s) back!
Basically a Cripple Cam 😂
Just once I'd love if a youtuber showed me something "affordable" that is not the same price as my rent
Lol people keep crying about one word the guy said. For over 90% of us, this (photography/videography with a camera) is a luxury, not a necessity, so being affordable should be put in context when compared with other recent full frame cameras that offer similar features out there. It will not be affordable when the buyers can’t even consider other options.
Frame of reference for Photography CZcamsrs. Anything over $600 is not considered "affordable" by anyone making under $200,000 a year, which is 99% of people.
do you live in japan!? :D
vei se essa camera tiver log direto, sem ter que comprar o vlog, irei ficar triste ;-;
The footage coming out ot it looks kinda strange/crunchy to me though
i thought it was gonna be like 50 before i clicked on the video
How do you move from C1 in video to C1 in photo
Affordable my ars!
Also, for the same price, you can go with SONY...
CAD $2000.00 affordable to whom?
affordable for what it can do lol, nothing is “affordable” when talking about cameras
LUT ? As in Teal & Orange filter... Like no other colours exist?
Lut doesn't mean teal and orange filter.
@@kris4637 You missed my point: all the LUT he showed on this video looked very teal&orange. All of them... so, honestly people are abusing that kind of filtering.
Best for after steble videos
Wow its so affordable, reminds me when sony a7 was like 900😅
My new favorite trend is when out of touch film-tubers show off some affordable camera for the low low price of $1500+….
I just got the gx85 an now I see this
Can you make a full video for this S9? I’m very interested in.
Already live my friend: czcams.com/video/s_nUHuRoS98/video.html
Does it overheat?
Everyone complaining about the price. You obviously don’t run a photography business. Anything sub $2000 is CHEAP!
Is it global shutter?
I hate this shit. CHOOSE your words carefully. I watched this and was like "damn, if it's affordable maybe I'll check it out, I've been looking for a good video camera and this looks great"....I checked the comments and this is mad expensive. There's nothing affordable about it at all, how out of touch with reality and the economy are these people???
for that price I can get a go pro, iPhone SE , and a cheap Panasonic superzoom.
One of the most affordable full frame, yes. But also costs $1500. Similar to Sony A7 III.
Basically Panasonic’s try at the a7c?
"Affordable" lmao kick rocks
It's like saying a rocket is affordable, yea it's 28 billion dollar but for this price to be able to travel to the moon is pretty cheap
An actual affordable camera is canons EOS series. More specifically the EOS 100 great for beginners from $500-$700
affordable? I don't think so
what's wrong with you?
@@VideoGameBoxReviews Hey bro, I mean this new camera w/o mechanic shutter, no hot shoes, no EVF, no small & compact lens to choose from (that MF 26mm F8 is a joke), recording limit (even in FHD), plastic body (no weather sealing) and it charged for 1500$
I just got AKASO Brave 8 LTE for $179. I think it’s the cheapest budget camera on the market.
Canon R8 says hello, or Nikon Z5
Full frame camera: Slim, lightweight.
Full frame lenses: Sumo wrestlers.
Price🥶🥶🥶🥶🌚
Looks can be deceiving, to many compromisers for non real gain, as the lens options you either go with the new get lens, which awful or put a larger lens on it and you loose all the advantage of compact size, not to mention what else they have left out to achieve the size, I do wonder who will buy it?