Political Theory NCERT- Don't Miss these MUST Asked PRELIMS Concepts | Sleepy Classes

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 19. 05. 2024
  • 🎯 Overlooked Corners of NCERT by Sleepy Classes is an initiative to keep you apprised of essential Prelims Specific topics from NCERT textbooks that are generally overlooked, selected by our highly esteemed faculty. It is just the knowledge you need to crack UPSC Prelims 2024!
    đŸ””To download the PDF, Join our Telegram Group: bit.ly/SleepyPreMix
    đŸ”” To join our Free initiative, click on the link given below: bit.ly/FewMins2023
    🎯To download the Overlooked Corners of NCERT PDFs:
    sleepyclasses.com/overlooked-...
    âžĄïž Boost Your Preparation with the FREE PYQ Compilation PDF of All Subjects:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïž Boost Your Preparation with Free 50 Important Topics Series for UPSC Prelims 2024:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïž To Enroll in "MAPS 2024: Mapping and Prelims Success Batch" - Your Ultimate Quick Revision Companion for UPSC Preparation! :
    sleepyclasses.learnyst.site/m...
    âžĄïž CSAT Sprint Course for UPSC Prelims 2024:
    sleepyclasses.com/csat-for-up...
    🎯PSIR COURSES-
    âžĄïž PSIR Mentorship Course for 2025 - Batch - 3:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïžPSIR With Evaluation Course for 2025 - Batch - 3:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïžPSIR Without Evaluation Course for 2025 - Batch - 3:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïžPSIR Current Affairs for UPSC 2025:
    courses.sleepyclasses.com/lea...
    âžĄïž Brochure Guide Courses 2025:
    sleepyclasses.com/wp-content/...
    📚Check out all our courses: bit.ly/SleepyClasses
    🔔 Subscribe to our other CZcams channels:
    Sleepy Classes Govt. Jobs: / @supersleepyclasses
    đŸ”č Follow Sleepy Classes on other platforms:
    Instagram - bit.ly/SleepyInsta
    Facebook - bit.ly/SleepyFacebook
    ✅ Download the Sleepy Classes app to learn on the go:
    đŸ“±Android: bit.ly/SleepyAppAndroid
    đŸ“±iOS: bit.ly/SleepyAppiOS

Komentáƙe • 21

  • @Suneendra.B
    @Suneendra.B Pƙed 4 dny

    both 1 and 2

  • @ravi_2512
    @ravi_2512 Pƙed 11 dny

    thank you sleepy đŸ˜ŽđŸ˜ŽđŸ„±đŸ„± classes ❀, prerna ma'am ❀

  • @ananya5205
    @ananya5205 Pƙed 22 dny

    Option c

  • @niteshjangra9172
    @niteshjangra9172 Pƙed 24 dny

    B

  • @supriyamdanwal2813
    @supriyamdanwal2813 Pƙed 24 dny

    2 only

  • @rajuprasadverma951
    @rajuprasadverma951 Pƙed 24 dny

    B option is right ma'am

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 24 dny +2

      B- 2 only is correct. First statement is incorrect because equality does not mean identical treatment. If the statement was qualified identical treatment under law, then it would have been correct (rule of law) but in the question, the first statement is very broad.
      Use the same example, the PM and an ordinary citizen may not have identical treatment in general which is not considered wrong under tenets of equality. But when it comes to application of law to both, then both will witness identical treatment. So always read the fine print

  • @manishkashyap9628
    @manishkashyap9628 Pƙed 24 dny

    D

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 23 dny

      B- 2 only is correct. First statement is incorrect because equality does not mean identical treatment. If the statement was qualified identical treatment under law, then it would have been correct (rule of law) but in the question, the first statement is very broad.
      Use the same example, the PM and an ordinary citizen may not have identical treatment in general which is not considered wrong under tenets of equality. But when it comes to application of law to both, then both will witness identical treatment.

  • @poonampandey6091
    @poonampandey6091 Pƙed 24 dny

    C ma'am

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 24 dny +1

      B- 2 only is correct. First statement is incorrect because equality does not mean identical treatment. If the statement was qualified identical treatment under law, then it would have been correct (rule of law) but in the question, the first statement is very broad.
      Use the same example, the PM and an ordinary citizen may not have identical treatment in general which is not considered wrong under tenets of equality. But when it comes to application of law to both, then both will witness identical treatment. So always read the fine print

    • @poonampandey6091
      @poonampandey6091 Pƙed 24 dny

      @@SleepyClassesIAS but mam under article 14 there is equality before law as well as equal protection of law
      Same with article 15 where identical treatment can be granted to some sections like women children etccc
      Kindly plzzz make me clear regarding this

    • @GoalGallant
      @GoalGallant Pƙed 24 dny

      ​@@SleepyClassesIAS I have also same doubt mam please clarify

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 20 dny

      @@poonampandey6091 again as I mentioned in comment, article 14 would require statement to read identical treatment by law and not just generic identical treatment. So imagine the difference between treating everyone equal vs treating everyone same / identical. In fact article 15 providing prohibition of discrimination also allows for special provisions being allowed for women and children which means over and above similar treatment to aid them and give them substantive Equality

  • @Aditi25119
    @Aditi25119 Pƙed 24 dny

    1 only

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 24 dny +1

      B- 2 only is correct. First statement is incorrect because equality does not mean identical treatment. If the statement was qualified identical treatment under law, then it would have been correct (rule of law) but in the question, the first statement is very broad.
      Use the same example, the PM and an ordinary citizen may not have identical treatment in general which is not considered wrong under tenets of equality. But when it comes to application of law to both, then both will witness identical treatment. So always read the fine print

  • @SudhaKumari-mj5nu
    @SudhaKumari-mj5nu Pƙed 23 dny

    B

  • @yashodeepawchar6600
    @yashodeepawchar6600 Pƙed 24 dny

    C

    • @SleepyClassesIAS
      @SleepyClassesIAS  Pƙed 24 dny +1

      B- 2 only is correct. First statement is incorrect because equality does not mean identical treatment. If the statement was qualified identical treatment under law, then it would have been correct (rule of law) but in the question, the first statement is very broad.
      Use the same example, the PM and an ordinary citizen may not have identical treatment in general which is not considered wrong under tenets of equality. But when it comes to application of law to both, then both will witness identical treatment. So always read the fine print

  • @shubhamsingla4935
    @shubhamsingla4935 Pƙed 24 dny +2

    B