Quantum Mind, Quantum Body, Quantum Universe

SdĂ­let
VloĆŸit
  • čas pƙidĂĄn 25. 06. 2023
  • Quantum Mind, Quantum Body, Quantum Universe
    Please share you opinion objections disagreements or agreements 🙏
    #QuantumMind #QuantumBody #QuantumUniverse #QuantumEntanglement #quantumphysics #quantummechanics

Komentáƙe • 98

  • @lindahartford3401
    @lindahartford3401 Pƙed rokem +23

    When I was little (I'm 85 yrs. old now) and I asked my mother about God, she explained to me that God is the energy in everyone that connects us to each other. I also have this idea from Jesus that God is Love. I am a nurse. not a scientist, but I get the sense of connection with everything and everybody, the oneness of all. I was wondering lately what quantum is and I think this sense of oneness may be just that. It is just so easy to slip into what people call reality and hard for me to let go of ego long enough to get back into oneness

  • @TheHeartphone
    @TheHeartphone Pƙed rokem +16

    In the end (in my humble opinion) even the quantum mind, body, universe are human constructs. Only consciousness is and it contains everything we humans ever have constructed or will construct. As you say Deepak: consciousness is unpredictable, creative and renewing at every moment. It is truly wonderful when you realize what consciousness is capable of and it has no ending.........

  • @thomasbrouwer2771
    @thomasbrouwer2771 Pƙed rokem +2

    OMG! this video is huge. Thanks for sharing. Amazing opportunity for a leap in understanding.

  • @TheInnerCastle
    @TheInnerCastle Pƙed rokem +7

    Isn't the word "quantum" kind of silly, when we're talking about the immeasurable, invisible, indivisible, infinite side of things? Measuring nothing with something seems like science chasing its own tail. 💞

    • @frantzypop1486
      @frantzypop1486 Pƙed rokem +1

      Like... Just because we talk about reality, it doesn't make reality a word, and no one can say what reality is, becsuse it isn't words..(Alan Watts reference)

  • @kiwamura8539
    @kiwamura8539 Pƙed rokem +3

    Quantum Mind, Body and Universe are all one and entangled in itself

  • @sukandapunyaporn9887
    @sukandapunyaporn9887 Pƙed rokem +1

    I agree with you.Consciousness is mysterious,no time no space nonlocality.

  • @user-ew4sy5pf4t
    @user-ew4sy5pf4t Pƙed rokem +1

    🙏 GratidĂŁo suas palavras Ă© a voz da sabedoria superior

  • @ambigainaidoo673
    @ambigainaidoo673 Pƙed 2 měsĂ­ci

    Thank you An excellent explanation 👍

  • @srinivasannatarajan9645
    @srinivasannatarajan9645 Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci +1

    I am a retired technology professional - masters in science and masters in engineering. Used computer vision and AI for defect diagnosis for NDE and disease diagnostic for glaucoma.
    From one of your earlier talks I picked up the following for AI applicability:
    If we take the taxonomy of mind, thoughts and action: 1. Para, 2. Pashyanthi, 3. Madhyama 4. Vaikhari. This taxonomy can't be simulated by AI. Para is a thought in sub conscious mind, pashyanti is infinite possibilities, madhyama is reduction to manageable level from pashyanti. Neural networks can't handle unbound solution space. Reduction from infinite possibilities, similarly is impossible.
    Another scenario:
    Advaita taxonomy - waking state, dream state, dreamless sleep, turiam - can't be simulated by AI. This flow itself is an experience under consciousness. If we recognise something as consciousness then we need to conclude it isn't. Its an elusive quanta. I want to check if an answer could be found in 'Thiru Moolar Thiru Mandiram' an ancient Saiva Sidhant text in Tamil.
    Thanks Deepak
    Srinivasan N

  • @mkh2799
    @mkh2799 Pƙed rokem

    🙏

  • @ramasatyanarayan9887
    @ramasatyanarayan9887 Pƙed rokem +1

    I am very ordinary person not an expert in any field of knowledge, however if I am able to understand and agree fully, what is said here, there should be absolutely no argument against this vedio. Thanks for sharing your enlightening insight.

  • @user-iy9fs3xs1l
    @user-iy9fs3xs1l Pƙed rokem +1

    ❀ Good early Saturday morning Deepak Chopra 🙏😊 You know I Am Always out there somewhere!đŸ•Żïž The mind and the body Play Together,as an instrument 🎾 When I play,I can feel it tangibly in every cell (skin, muscle, nerves?) Love you 🌈đŸȘ¶ Grace Victoria 🩋💕

  • @jansunjmcb
    @jansunjmcb Pƙed rokem +1

    Thank you dear Deepak and looking forward to your next book. There will always be naysayers or those who thrive on argument. Ahhh, the joy of entanglement. ❀

  • @srinathkunapareddy1992
    @srinathkunapareddy1992 Pƙed rokem

    Wow!

  • @MindfulPompous
    @MindfulPompous Pƙed 10 měsĂ­ci +1

    This makes sense to me, basically “quantum” is the personification of all that is, at least what we’re capable of comprehending at this time

  • @user-ew4sy5pf4t
    @user-ew4sy5pf4t Pƙed rokem

    🙏 Gratidão grande guru namaskaram

  • @SandraRodriguez-nn8ok
    @SandraRodriguez-nn8ok Pƙed 6 měsĂ­ci

    Hello Dr. Choppra. Ive been watching you for years. I admire your eork, and all discoveries. Everything is energy from one dource therefore everything is Quantum😊. It would be an honor to meet you some day!

  • @zenfreya4779
    @zenfreya4779 Pƙed rokem +4

    Quantam Healing is what drew me to your works. I have been a follower since. Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us, even against the mainstream naysayers. Your voice resonates with those who are ready to hear your words.🙏much gratitude and appreciation for you Mr. Chopra

  • @fokkenhotz1
    @fokkenhotz1 Pƙed rokem

    thank youđŸ™đŸŒŹïžđŸ’‹

  • @educationsolution3987
    @educationsolution3987 Pƙed rokem

    Thankyou

  • @ewamwild
    @ewamwild Pƙed 3 měsĂ­ci +1

    Absolutely yes.
    As a possibility.
    Observation is not that which validates existence. Observer is not that which realizes the manifestation.
    Mind inspired by desire selects.
    heart magnetically pulls
    into the field of consciousness,
    ever-expanding through the experience.
    what was the question?

  • @kashmeera6786
    @kashmeera6786 Pƙed rokem +1

    The observer and the observed are entangled.
    Consciousness is the source. Makes complete sense

  • @juergenmueller9952
    @juergenmueller9952 Pƙed rokem +1

    Dear Deepak I have followed your writings and teachings over the last 12 years and you have been a source of change for me. And I could also observe how you walked on the path of wisdom and fulfilling your life's purpose. And I feel your question here is the question on the forefront about quantum and isn't the real question if someone finds an argument about the divine creation and divine order.

  • @MEZBAHN
    @MEZBAHN Pƙed rokem +1

    "Yat Pinday Tat Brahmande", the ancient verse in Sanskrit says it all.
    And it means that the Macro and the Micro (Quantum) are the same. It's information manifesting in various forms.
    Quantum, when manifests, breaks the symmetry of the Universe. As symmetry of universe is broken, the Universe deploys correction tools. Thus develops a dual-curvature in fabric of Consciousness Energy Field which envelops the heavier matter in 4D space-time. Laws of physics apply. The two grand theories of Science, GR & QM merge within the BlackHole and White Hole formations forming a shell where performance happens.
    The purpose is to get rid of entanglement and nullify the disorder. Everything happens in a quantum state. Thus, you are right Dr Deepak, that quantum is the core and the fundamental nature of Quantum is based on 100% ethics, unconditional love...which are higher traits above Science. Nature is ethically neutral.â€đŸ˜Š... Susheel

  • @xiturralde
    @xiturralde Pƙed rokem

    I LOVE YOU!!! TYSM!!! MUCH GRATITUDE & LOVE!!! ♄

  • @B4God5402
    @B4God5402 Pƙed rokem +1

    Physicists have proposed that the Higgs Boson field is what gives mass to everything. Since human beings are also "mass" then we "are" because of that quantum field as well.❀

  • @toddfincannon1890
    @toddfincannon1890 Pƙed rokem +1

    The quantum universe is also quantum mind. An individual consciousness such as a human mind closes off a region in the quantum field of awareness through self-referential entanglement. It is not completely isolated, but separated as an individual by a semi-permeable boundary, the same way a cell is isolated by the cell membrane. The source of its aliveness is a superposition of self-referential ("internal") and external entanglement.

  • @yonigrace
    @yonigrace Pƙed rokem

    thank you for these important questions. Is it possible to simply allow the mystery of source (not knowing whether it is nothing or something material) to exist.

  • @carlenec4487
    @carlenec4487 Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci +1

    Thank you for your brilliant work! I've been a big fan of yours for years. I believe visionaries like you are called pseudoscientists by some is because academic "fundamentalists" refuse to acknowledge the implications of the quantum world. They will assent to it because modern research gives them no other choice, but they also insist on clinging to their outdated Newtonian prejudices. I spent many years in academia, and, I must say, it contains plenty of bloated egos unwilling to open their minds to new ways of thinking. So their way of keeping a stranglehold on "truth" is to declare anyone who teaches the amazing implications of a quantum world a "false" scientist--and out of the club. It's ironic that the Enlightenment arose out of humanities desire to rid ourselves of oppressive religious dogma and its suppression of free thought--now we find the institution that rightly challenged that oppression is following in its footsteps.

  • @106Debi
    @106Debi Pƙed rokem +2

    I am open to the infinite possibilities of Quantum and what it will look like when we are more intuned as a consciousness ❀

    • @highvibefreqzshow5967
      @highvibefreqzshow5967 Pƙed rokem +1

      There is nothing out of tune with consciousness except the thinking mind which is completely lost in illusion.

    • @barretjames8320
      @barretjames8320 Pƙed rokem +1

      also when more intuned and in this consciousness deepack will know his glasses are bent i think he does it on purpose so we can focus

  • @africauriarte4780
    @africauriarte4780 Pƙed rokem

    Deepak soy Africa, prĂĄcticamente del Espiritualismo.
    No tengo profesiĂłn alguna solo estudio y analizo lo que leo, lo que veo. Estando estudiando las leyes universales espirituales. El poder de la respiraciĂłn. La energĂ­a que nos mueve que es El EspĂ­ritu.
    Creo absolutamente en qué la mente es cuåntica, nos lo explica Los cuerpos energéticos o sutiles.
    La informaciĂłn que hay en la mente la obtenemos atravez de ellos.
    Despertar la Retrocognicion y la Precognicion nos damos cuenta lo cuĂĄntica que es la mente.
    Mi humilde opiniĂłn.
    NAMASTE🙏

  • @AdrianSlo
    @AdrianSlo Pƙed rokem +2

    Hello Deepak, have a nice day

  • @deborahm6036
    @deborahm6036 Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci

    I agree with everything you said. The attitude of which you speak, is exactly why I decided to change my college major, Physics, which was my first love. The minds around me were firmly shut.

  • @robertopons8405
    @robertopons8405 Pƙed 10 měsĂ­ci +2

    Dear Deepak, I am a curious recipient of scientific observation related to Quantum Mechanics. I have always question why Einstein’s theory of relativity contrasts with the physics of Quantum mechanics. They are not compatible. In fact, when someone supporting the physics of quantum mechanics propose to Einstein that there are many predictions of a physical act, and that those predictions depend on the observer, like when you throw dices on a table, that all predictions are real but only the observer will determine the outcome or result, Albert Einstein responded: “God does not throw dices” “If we can determine the variables of the actions of throwing the dices, such as velocity, wind, acceleration, etc, we would be able to predict the outcome of the result. In fact, Quantum mechanics is the mother of computer calculations, everything exists as a possible outcome, all results are there, and the action of the observer will determine the outcome.

  • @CarolLynnWilliams
    @CarolLynnWilliams Pƙed rokem +4

    👉 Hard line scientists, even quantum physicists, can trap themselves in limited thinking. Not all "accused" of pseudo-science ARE pseudo !!! We just don't know until we pursue more as our knowledge base continues expanding. My favorite expression is from Shakespeare: *There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy.*

    • @highvibefreqzshow5967
      @highvibefreqzshow5967 Pƙed rokem

      All that is expanding is our repression of ignorance and addiction to conceptualizing as if “reality” is discovered through thinking. 😂

  • @sophiarevel6952
    @sophiarevel6952 Pƙed rokem

    Obviously these physicists weren't able to take the quantum leap. ❀ I love your exploring nature.

  • @MariaShapley
    @MariaShapley Pƙed rokem

    Agreed!

  • @blancabeatrizreyes1270
    @blancabeatrizreyes1270 Pƙed rokem +1

    Dro DEEPAK CHOPRA NAMASTE ❀

  • @katherinadams7173
    @katherinadams7173 Pƙed rokem +1

    Well, I don't see an argument/disagreement either.
    When I got into your teachings and started to learn, it made total sense, so I am also curious on feedback.
    Deepak, you've said you've been "questioned" a long time on your beliefs and some have thought you were a "little out there", 😊..well, I feel any of us who believe the same way, have also been looked upon as being "out there". No I'm no scientist or have degrees, BUT I and many others have has experiences in life and reflecting back, we know the beliefs we have hold true. I VALUE ALL these experiences..they always "firm up" my beliefs❀

  • @Luguiraud
    @Luguiraud Pƙed rokem +8

    For what is called and considered "science", the observed can be described in the equations of quantum physics, but the observer itself cannot. I'm not a scientist in this area, but I don't think we have an equation for "observers" yet. They are outside the quantum system. So, ironically, while urging us to transcend the old observer-observed duality, quantum physics, as expressed today, actually supports this duality. It is still incomplete and will remain so until we can include the observers and, at least in the case of human observers, include the consciousness with which they make their observations. However, consciousness is still a big problem for scientists... Ironically, only pseudoscientists in their pseudoscience will be able to solve it? Materialistic scientists will never be able to "swallow" this naturally... I'm realizing that we're going to have to offer them a lot of water!!! I would love to read your book that is in the "oven"... đŸ“šđŸ‘â€đŸ™

  • @vasumathyram3666
    @vasumathyram3666 Pƙed 5 měsĂ­ci

    To one's strength of the mind,the observer quantifies the object.

  • @annakarl9989
    @annakarl9989 Pƙed rokem

    😍đŸŒč

  • @frantzypop1486
    @frantzypop1486 Pƙed rokem +1

    I'm kind of young, maybe a bit more naive, but I'm curious.. Should there be no split in describing the obsserver, observed and observation, how would we talk about it? I mean.. It seems to me that entanglement is true, but spliting the experience for communication purposes is also true.. I'm guessing, being a doctor is a profession that can't really escape this process, because the body can be split in many parts for the purpose of discussion, yet still be a whole entity

  • @kellyguilfoyle7514
    @kellyguilfoyle7514 Pƙed rokem

    🕉💗

  • @frankie6490
    @frankie6490 Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci

    Is the heart made out of matter?

  • @AdrianSlo
    @AdrianSlo Pƙed rokem +1

    I think that quantum physics implies consciousness collapses the wave function, which means reality is fundamentally subjective. "Measuring, observing, observer" implies a crucial role of the mind in relation to matter. But is the mind itself quantum? I would say not, because the mind or consciousness actually cannot be labeled as it isn't material.

  • @GUPTAYOGENDRA
    @GUPTAYOGENDRA Pƙed 2 měsĂ­ci

    Sir, what you have said makes sense if we believe that one observer which is not other than Consciousness is observing through every body.

  • @33parentino
    @33parentino Pƙed rokem

    Good day Deepak ❀

  • @jefferyjimson8574
    @jefferyjimson8574 Pƙed rokem

    Hello Deepak, do you have any experience or knowledge about gaze detection - the phenomena of influencing another being by looking at them? Thank you.

    • @TheChopraWell
      @TheChopraWell  Pƙed rokem

      Yes I have

    • @jefferyjimson8574
      @jefferyjimson8574 Pƙed rokem

      @@TheChopraWell Ok I find when I look at someone they look up or in my direction, have you done any experiments surrounding this and do you know if it is entirely proven? Thank you.

  • @truenews4901
    @truenews4901 Pƙed rokem

    To learn observer and observed principle listen to j krishnamurti. ..

  • @guidos8095
    @guidos8095 Pƙed rokem

    This is Salvatore , a 7:38 Phisicyst from Brasil. What you mean by quantum is sonething who has been divided until arrives to the minimun piece of matter defined by Plank’s constant?

    • @guidos8095
      @guidos8095 Pƙed rokem

      I love you Deepak, respect a lot your work, and would like to unite forces with you in this subject. A doubt to explain is how can you divide the mind unto quantum pieces? How can the mind expresses a quantum nature as particle-wave ?

    • @guidos8095
      @guidos8095 Pƙed rokem

      Im my opinion these problems can be solved just viewing the mind as a field- a Quantum Field quantum field in

    • @guidos8095
      @guidos8095 Pƙed rokem

      In the Quantum field called mind all that we can perceive arises and subsides as packages of energy and information

  • @hannaraoul7731
    @hannaraoul7731 Pƙed rokem

    Thank you 🙏
    Consciousness is all there is, it is Quantum. It is intelligent, it is Alive.
    Quantum makes time, 2.5 sec in all its dimentions and its other + 2.5. They become 5 and 7 and 1 :)
    It is Transforming, Love, Energy, Manifestation. It's Brief.
    Quantum body is alive Deepak.
    Why ?

  • @axtell_audios
    @axtell_audios Pƙed rokem

    Well, it's more comfortable to take the Blue Pill of convention. I think the Red Pill makes things much more interesting.

  • @fokkenhotz1
    @fokkenhotz1 Pƙed rokem +1

    with all grace, Deepak? , i suppose we need a more detailed explanation of 'quantum' as used by phycisists and endocrinologists in pertanation of the adjective,,, other than 'small'. do we have mini-consciousnesses? do we have major egos? do we have small or quantum restrictions on our awareness? good question ⁉

    • @highvibefreqzshow5967
      @highvibefreqzshow5967 Pƙed rokem +1

      You don’t need any explanation for anything whatsoever. That is the mind constantly with its seeking through thinking which will get the mind nowhere but keep the confusion going. The mind itself is an illusion.

    • @fokkenhotz1
      @fokkenhotz1 Pƙed rokem

      @@highvibefreqzshow5967 well then quantum = the very define of 'tiny' I suppose micro and macro graphics aren't in my advisors perspective of the future

  • @maga1475
    @maga1475 Pƙed 10 měsĂ­ci

    Hi.
    I have a few questions. Not for you to answer but to be asked at least:
    1. If observer creates reality, what body can be qualified as observer?
    2. If conciousness is required, then how it can be described?
    3. When germ becomes observer?
    And final one:
    4. When YOU become an observer? With your first memory? With your first choice? Or you're just using this body with all it's memories? Then from what point of time? From 40 years ago? From 1 sec ago?
    And who are you without your primitive emotions and instincts?
    Imagine one day humanity will find answers to all that questions. I don't think so.

  • @reginafefifofina
    @reginafefifofina Pƙed rokem

    5:03 iai is a channel where you could find cooler scientists. Robert Grant is interesting too.
    The comedian Katt Williams says if you don’t have any haters, you’re doing something wrong. Keep going and try to get more 😂

  • @highvibefreqzshow5967
    @highvibefreqzshow5967 Pƙed rokem

    Quantum concepts.

  • @sangeetaArjunasharma
    @sangeetaArjunasharma Pƙed rokem

    Consciousness is all there is, but mind , body exists in it same as waves are part of ocean. Quantum mind, quantum body and quantum universe all exists within consciousness , when duality comes in picture , we see them as object and subject but when there is oneness there is no mind, hence no subject or object. These states of consciousness are interchangeable . What do you mean by quantum body, mind and universe as opposed to simple body, mind and universe?

  • @afh6552
    @afh6552 Pƙed rokem

    As a race we are finished. We never grasped the concept of love. Which is unconditional. God / consciousness does not save you in life but in death.

  • @anavartalitis8425
    @anavartalitis8425 Pƙed rokem

    Sorry, it's beyond me but I asked a friend to give her opinion. She is a Tibetan Buddhist nun from Venezuela who teaches Quantum Physics at the Universidad Nacional de San Luis, Argentina.

  • @gbaked
    @gbaked Pƙed rokem

    Isn't ChatGPT a human construct?

  • @Helena-ie1ev
    @Helena-ie1ev Pƙed rokem

    Quantum is also not quantum
    It's both
    Receive a quantum hug ❀

  • @johnsiegfried
    @johnsiegfried Pƙed rokem

    If God makes an object but never looks at it again does it exist?

  • @LotharRumold
    @LotharRumold Pƙed rokem

    Either we have reached an area with the quantum theory where illusion and ultimate reality become one, or the quanta are only the provisionally last deception about the nature of the so-called objective reality. If the latter is the case, which I assume, the quanta and what perceives the quanta as such (mind) are not identical. Assuming, of course, that what is perceived or conceived (e. g. quanta) is identical to the ability of perceiving or conceiving (mind) the question of the identity or non-identity of mind and quantum answers itself.

    • @highvibefreqzshow5967
      @highvibefreqzshow5967 Pƙed rokem +1

      Those are still only just thoughts. Thinking is never going to reveal truth.

    • @LotharRumold
      @LotharRumold Pƙed rokem

      @@highvibefreqzshow5967 Thank you for your thought that thinking is never going to reveal truth. But I recently read that truth can never be revealed by thinking thoughts.

  • @krya66
    @krya66 Pƙed rokem

    I want to share something whit you
    I have many problems whith many ,you know ,not enough..My mind was very bisy .I have meditation and prayer.Somehow a Question occuring in me Somebady ask :Whats is money?
    I was perplex
    A thoth who was not in my mind
    But in me. I want help and my "soul" have no Idea what is maney and obvios no idea how to help .
    In us is something who want to know whats hapended but not enogh entanglend or conection
    I thing eachone ist diferrent We have to lern from inside of us which is someting who is not experiensing by science

  • @VijaySharma-gb8og
    @VijaySharma-gb8og Pƙed 8 měsĂ­ci

    You speak similar to J Krishnamurti

  • @awazirzada5120
    @awazirzada5120 Pƙed rokem +1

    The word Quantum
does not serve the purpose
when we talk about consciousness.
    In Physics, Quantum refers to a discrete or quantifiable unit of a phenomenon e.g., quantum of light that is photon and quantum of electricity that is electron

    We don’t have the right vocabulary to define the state of consciousness or the state of observing or what is being observed
I don’t think the state of consciousness can be quantified.
    According to the quantum field theory the fundamental particles such as an electrons, photons and quarks are created due to excitation of the quantum fields. Different particles are formed and destroyed as they absorb and release energy quanta. These particles and energy quanta are the fundamental building blocks of matter hence part of every animate and inanimate thing in the universe, therefore we can say that our bodies and the universe are quantum in nature.
    However, when we talk about mind
it is not discrete, not made up of discrete parts and cannot be quantified. Whatever the construct of the mind is, we still cannot fathom or define it, and it is ever changing. Mind is not made up of atoms and molecules or discrete fundamental units of particles and photons (like the brain) hence the word ‘quantum mind’ cannot be used for the ‘mind’. The mind as the observer, is the ‘soft’ part of the hardware that is the brain and cannot be quantified. The function of consciousness is taking place due to the way the nerve cells are wired. The neurotransmitters somehow communicate with some high level of intelligence embedded in the universe, the common universal source of intelligence that helps it to interpret and analyze phenomenon and create the ‘reality’ we all observe. Therefore, some may assume that consciousness is not local, it is downloaded from a singularity, the common source of consciousness. The interpretation of death will be that the hardware communication system, the neurons in this case, cease to download the ‘observer software’ or consciousness.
    However, this reality is a function of our species’ minds and only allows us to observe what it is ‘designed or programmed’ to observe, nothing more, nothing less. Therefore, whatever constructs we humans come up with to understand reality is dependent on whatever limitations may exist on our minds or the framework in which the mind operates. Can a reality exist without an observer? I think it can. Even in the existing universe there is a large part of it that is unobservable (we can only see anything by light or energy reflected from it - hence termed the unobservable universe) and our species may never get the opportunity to observe it. Again 95% of the universe is dark energy and dark matter which is unobservable for our minds. The second question is about the reality existing in our minds, assuming it is entangled with it, and since the universe (reality) is quantum so must be our minds? In this possibility, reality could exist as a simulation of our minds but that does not mean that the generator of simulation has the same nature as the simulation. Just like a holographic AI simulation does not have the same nature as the computer that generates it.

    • @joannaedwards6325
      @joannaedwards6325 Pƙed měsĂ­cem

      Thank you so much for that mini college course. I enjoyed your expertise. ✌

  • @alfreddifeo9642
    @alfreddifeo9642 Pƙed rokem

    Is it possible they resist because of object identity with name and forum. so resisting the notion of the Oneness that which is playing ALL that Is. Some thing we all do until we don't. Safe trip brother.

  • @samrowbotham8914
    @samrowbotham8914 Pƙed rokem

    Do people like Stapp and Rovelli agree with you? What about the Nobel Prize awarded last year to Aspect et al, for their work on entanglement, showing that non-local realism is an illusion. How does that fit with what you stated in this video DC?

    • @lavenderferyal5453
      @lavenderferyal5453 Pƙed rokem

      Of course, not all scientists will agree, but it must be a number of them who are working on both sides spiritual and scientific levels who reached this using logic as you did. Thank you for sharing

  • @guidos8095
    @guidos8095 Pƙed rokem

    Beloved Deepak, as a physicist, I am feeiling to tell you that you can use David Bown’s Zero point energy theory to define a Quantum mind-body as a manifestation in space-time. of Zero point energy as an Individualized vortex movement, which takes the form of each body-mind according to the Beloved Deepak, as a physicist I am feeiling to tell you that you can use David Bown’s Zero point energy theory to define a Quantum mind-body as a manifestation in space-time. of Zero point energy as an Individualized vortex movement, which takes the form of a body-mind according to it’s level of consciousness Does it make sense to you?

  • @prakashvakil3322
    @prakashvakil3322 Pƙed rokem

    Aatmiya DIVINITY
    Jay Mataji
    HARE KRSNA.
    Quantum Mind, Quantum Body, Quantum Universe... FINE but Quantum CONSCIOUSNESS?
    No. No. No.
    CONSCIOUSNESS (energy) is distinguishing body, mind, universe (matter) and NOT otherwise ever.
    I Am OK NO Matter What

  • @endofdaysprophet
    @endofdaysprophet Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci +1

    The consciousness mind is quantum in nature. Everything is entangled because on a sub atomic level everything is made up of the same thing. "String" level physics is GOD created strings so at the very core everything was Created by GOD just with different attributes. We are NOT one just because we are entangled! We are connected or entangled because of many reasons. At the base is the CREATOR YAHWEH. then you have strings which everything is made of. Then their is like strings. We could have strings which have the same shape yet different actions or vibration which make them appear to be quite different yet on some level they are the same. The observer affect is a HUMAN paradigm which makes a lot of entanglement factors like the relativity of time in which humans are bound! Obviously this is just scratching the surface. I believe this is the bases for proving GOD in a physical sense. I appreciate your thoughts just as strings entangle us on a physical sense same or similar thoughts connect us on a conscious level. Of course one connects to the other and vice versa!!!

  • @user-dn9lt6pk6u
    @user-dn9lt6pk6u Pƙed 11 měsĂ­ci

    God says in his book the Quran that all physical existence is real and true
    And he called all physical existence ( his words )
    And he also said that he is real as well as his sayings and the the book he authored is real .
    Now one the biggest philosophical quest that the Quran presented says
    Is what we say in our eyes is the the same what is visualized in our minds ?
    If that is true
    I need someone to tell me who Ami ?
    Became the universe is quantum then the body and mind as well as our body construct actions and reactions which part of it is our metabolism must be quantum in nature
    And all gods words and himself is beyond human consciousness
    Wajdi Fahoum

  • @user-wz4jt2vr3b
    @user-wz4jt2vr3b Pƙed rokem +1

    I’m simply horrified by your lack of knowledge of Quantum Mechanics. To start with I am neither a Quantum Physicist nor do I hold a PhD in any subject. But I learned from Dr Feynman and I must say that you are abusing your position to the detriment of your followers. Your “observation” that the observer and the observed are entangled is simply wrong. At the macro scale the observer and the object being observed are independent of each other. At the Planck scale the nature of observation itself changes and cannot be compared to the process of observation at macro scale.
    Please get your physics 101 right or else please restrict yourself to Neurology.
    Sincerely,
    A suitably educated person.

  • @user-iy9fs3xs1l
    @user-iy9fs3xs1l Pƙed rokem +1

    ❀ It seems even "emeshed," "baked in"... something more than entangled.🌈đŸȘ¶đŸŒ±đŸ’GVB🩋💕