1947 Partition Or Civil War: What Was Better Option? |
Vložit
- čas přidán 1. 08. 2021
- 1947 - Partition or a one-time civil war: What was the better option? Did Partition solve anything? Lincoln Vs. Gandhi - who was the better leader?
WATCH FULL EPISODE ► • #AskAbhijit 15: Indian...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUPPORT THE CHANNEL
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda@icici
►PayPal: paypal.me/AbhijitChavda
►Become A Member on CZcams: / @abhijitchavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
JOIN #AbhijitChavda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Twitter: / abhijitchavda
★Instagram: / theabhijitchavda
★Facebook: / theabhijitchavda
★Website:
★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda@gmail.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AbhijitChavdaPodcast
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
★Spotify: open.spotify.com/show/1WmKYRI...
★Apple Podcasts: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
★Google Podcasts: podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0...
★Stitcher: www.stitcher.com/show/the-abh...
★Amazon Music: music.amazon.in/podcasts/c879...
★Soundcloud: / abhijitchavda
★Audible: www.audible.com/pd/item_name-...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
#AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
Thank you for watching!
Please share the video and spread the message. 🙏
Father of Pakistan,oh man that was really amazing sir
Yeh bete Abhijit sir mere se bhi bada wala savage dey diye
who did he mention as father of Pakistan
@@niteshfms1 Mohandas Gandhi
In a time like Gandhi and Nehru, be a Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
Well said
Tabhi kachra saaf kiya hota to na Pakistan hota, na Bangladesh, na 4 wars, na terror attacks, na CAA...
Aur Bharat bhi akhand hota.
Ofcourse
@Ahamasmi Sanatani in those times it was very difficult to differentiate between reality and fabricated news, alas now more and more people are uncovering the facts
Yes , have long term vision
"There is no avoiding war; it can only be postponed to the advantage of others."
Niccolo Machiavelli
Basic lessons from the Mahabharata which our leaders choose to forget:
Don't embrace sworn enemies citing Dharma and kinship.
Don't gamble to cover up your mental weakness and fear of battle.
And don't temporize on the field of battle.
Machiavelli was not nearly as educated as modern people today. He's very overrated.
@@purplespeckledappleeater8738 Well I just mentioned that one particular quote of his which is actually true.
Agar dono desh apna ego piche chhod de toh shanti se sab side ho skta h. Aur kuch compromise krna hoga.
Agar ye hum kr lete h toh India firse Greater India ban skta h
@@purplespeckledappleeater8738 education is was never a standard to determine common sense, common sense is a born and practiced quality to live life not need to read philosophy to use common sense.
Real sarcasm be like -- The great, the great Shri Jawaharlal Nehru 🤣🤣 That was so good
Yah he wait to say his name 🤣
50 lakh Hindus and Sikhs died in the post independence violence😭
not 50 approximately 2 millions
@@tapabratapal3276 that gives 20 lakhs
@Goblin ooo shut up
@@tapabratapal3276 official figures are reported by lazy desk officers.west Punjab, Sindh, KPK had a significant population of Hindus and sikhs.about 25% and there is a person in our village who lived in tharparkar district of sindh.he told that their ancestors lived in Kandahar province of afghanistan.and infact every damn of their families is dead.so this is enough to even figure out that atleast 5 million have died in the riots.just read 'the rape of Rawalpindi'.ur mind will be blown away.and atleast another 10 million died in 70 years due to religious persecution.we can't even save Kashmiri Hindus,forget about pakistani Hindus and Sikhs 😔
@@User15699 converted, raped,looted, massacred
I think civil war is the best option
After Gujarat riots
Now there are very less Hindu Muslim conflicts in Gujarat
❤️ From Gujarat
That riots gave rise to great leaders Modi, Shah, Gadkari and now whole Squad 💯
Even I just saw the Temple Attack series 🙏
mate thats because of modi not because of the riots like wtf. only ahmedabad had like hundreds of riots before. it reduced because of better law and order.
Yes agreed. From Gujarat. Even muslims are very prosperous in Gujarat (except few bangladesi illegals).
@@gauthampai896 Ahmedabad had more Riots during congress, because muslims were encouraged. Now since modi govt, muslims have stopped their crazy Jehadi ideas. They focus more on business and development. Most of the muslims I know dont even go to mosque or read their Qbook.
@@smitprmr i had written the same.
My only question is India was divided on religious basis, so where's the country belonging to Hindus(jains, sikhs, buddhists all) only?
.
Look even after partition, it takes us 70 years to make a temple and that too after many deaths. Where's peace.
@@stallonegodinho6296 Congress made Nepal communist country
Well...
1. Some Muslims didn't left for Pak and some non Muslims remained in Pakistan.
2. Gandhi and Nehru were against the total exchange of population.
Every person who is born in India is either a son or daughter of India then how can be a person father. Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose and heroes like Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad etc., are real heroes of Independence.
It was Netaji who first used the term Father of the Nation for Gandhiji
@@user-ie1bx1dm6z Rabindranath Tagore was the one.
@@superrex723 no he gave the term mahatma
@@superrex723 it was Netaji
Sri Ram was
Abhijit sir is absolutely right Mohandas Gandhi is the father of Pakistan not India.India was not created or integrated by Gandhi but it was done by Lord Krishna making Yudisthira as CHAKRABORTY SAMRAT in later by Acharaya Chanakya as like Abraham Lincoln did for USA.Bharat was present as India long before Gandhi.Gandhi was a British agent.He agreed to accept Dominion Status in 1928 and rejected by Netaji Bose.He was completely undemocratic as we know he forced Netaji,the then elected chairman of Congress,to leave the post as well as Sardar Patel in 1947.He made Hindus fool by saying half truth.He said 'Ahimsa Paramo Dharma' but never said 'Dharma Himsa Thaivacha'.He supported violence in favour of British but opposed self defence against British and peaceful community. He allowed to happen the great Calcutta Killing and Noakhali Riot but became a roadblock to the self defence of Hindus.He is also responsible for India’s so called soft power diplomacy and foreign policy.India will suffer and hence will be destroyed gradually if Gandhism is not rejected.
True
Truth, even Mohandas gandhi's photo should be removed from our currency notes
Things like this burns me from inside.....sir please lets talk about the solution.....what should a 18 Y/O do lead it's country towards glory??
I am a 20 year old. And I think the best we can do is to raise our generation connected to the culture of this land. Plus explore science (specially space) and tech as that is the future. Dharma for action and civility and science for future.
@@deeprajmazumder6261 root level kee baat kree..??
Ye gandi politics chl rahi h iska kya??
Polarisation peak prr h uskaa kya???
@@hardiksingh181 bhai problem sabko pata h. Solution bol raha hu mein. Root level me bole to start with programming. Raste bante jayenge
You are helpless. Its not like a one-man-army is gonna change anything.
Remember Untied we stand, Divided we fall.
@@arushreddi5419 pehle ek admi khada ho jaaye fir dekhna piche 1000 log aa jayenge
And when he said the great great shri jawahar lal nehru😂😂😂 i felt the sarcasm bro😂😂😂😂
#AskAbhijit why Islam Failed to enter in China and Japan and what is the reason for decline in Buddhism in China and it became an Atheist nation
the Ideology of communism party of china promotes atheism
Even Korea & Mongolia.
@@pranavbagurjagadeesha1208 not mongolia bro
Waha communist rule hai isliye koi religion tik nahi sakta
@Amimul Islam nope.
#AskAbhijit Whenever we think of Christmas, the image that often comes to mind is snow with Evergreen trees, Reindeers and the North Pole, everything mostly winter-themed. But Christ was born in Bethlehem in the Middle East, where there are no such geo-climatic occurrences. However, these themes of Winter, that are commonly associated with Christmastime, are found in the cultures of Germanic, Scandinavian and other North European peoples. The Germanic peoples used to celebrate "Yule" which was a pagan festivity, closely connected to pagan festivals like "Saturnalia" and "Brumalia" celebrated by ancient Romans, which marked the beginning of astronomical winter. Is it possible that the modern, so called Western, theme and representation of Christmas that we see today, is actually because Europeans (particularly the Germanic peoples and Romans) chose to stick to their indigenous polytheistic traditions even after the Christian takeover of the continent?
Thanks for sharing this information
@@Vizorfam You're welcome!
@Paul Joshi Surendar R Why do you say that Christmas is not Christian, it is after all a celebration of the birth of Christ, regardless of whatever European polytheistic influences it underwent. Also why are you, a Christian, blaming the Pope and other officials, is the Pope not supposed to be your "leader"? Doesn't he receive direct messages from Daddy and Sonny up there? Maybe you're misinformed, maybe JC and Daddy-o decided to change up the narrative, they're the authors after all aren't they? How do you know what Popey discussed with the so called triune Godhead? Also, if the Bible claims that Jesus actually walked the earth and went around Nazareth doing magic tricks, then why do you say that Christianity does not speak of idol worship? You literally had an actual guy who a lot of people saw. Wouldn't people create his idol? Knock, knock, that's how faith works. Don't forget the Vatican needs good reason to differentiate Christianity from Islam, enter the creation of ripped af Jesus idols. Tell me, since you're so convinced of the veracity of the scriptures, why do Christians consider the cross to be holy? Isn't the cross historically supposed to be a sign of brutality, inhumanity and shame? Wasn't crucifixion the most barbaric and abhorrent punishment of its day? Tell me one instance in the Bible wherein a verse speaks of cross being significant in any way to Christianity. Oh I forgot, half of it is Judaism! Again, same God Jehovah. How about I start worshipping Spider-Man? And talk about what's true and what's not according to the holy scriptures of Marvel Comics?
@Paul Joshi Surendar R How am I misinformed?
@Paul Joshi Surendar R Bro, you know, there are so many sectarian claims, thousands of monotheistic and polytheistic faiths, why do you wanna play My God is the One true God? It's a pointless game, don't you think?
Sounds like we should forget Kashmir, and start claiming Lahore, Islamabad instead. Because no consent was taken from the people of India. WTF are our politicians doing since then!
Trying to not-start a nuclear war?
@@truthseeker7383 I don't know what kind of truth are you seeking but Pakistan has been pain in the back for India ever since it was created. No matter how much you hide/ignore the fact, peace will never going prevail upon us until we bring Pakistan and it's military to be precise to it's knees. Our people have shed a great amount of blood now this cannot be forgiven. Whosoever in favour of the concept of Pakistan I don't want to seek peace with them.
@@kuntaldas125 wow , You just Speak my Words and Aim because I also like other Nationalist want Pakistan to be Erased from map and kill all its jihadi People!
@@kuntaldas125Then go to the frontline if you think human life is so insignificant lol
The nation should have gone to war in order to avoid Partition. But even if the leadership did not have the stomach for war, it should have insisted on a complete transfer of the minorities from the Islamic state to India
@Aa Bb And of course, transfer the Indian minorities out if they so desired. Territories had to be divided on the basis of populations not by favouring Pakistan, for it was given an approximate third for 25% population. Division would have had to be contiguous.
Sir, can you please tell about the Mughal defeat in Assam(Ahom kingdom) under the leadership of Lasith Borphukan, and why till today most of the school history books syllabus do not have a single word about it. We all know about Maharana Pratap, Shivaji who have fought their entire life against the tyranny of the Mughals but most of the Indians do not know about Lasith Borphukan.
The best happened was Partition , otherwise Jehadis would've started a never ending civil war , just like they did in Afghanistan, and Middle East , but what went wrong was that complete exchange of population didn't take place, it would've prevented the chaos we have today .
I disagree what about all the temples left in Pakistan, the land is sacred
Do a podcast with j sai deepak.
Definitely 💯
who is he ? forgive me if he is important
@@aashaypantoji39 Don't worry!just search his name in youtube.
Oho jai sai deepak
@@aashaypantoji39 he's an advocate from TN, he practice in Madras High court as well as in Supreme Court.
Same as Ishkaran Singh bhandari on a much pro level
Sir dont you think if indian and Pakistan were a single country then there would be more conflicts and tensions on a daily basis actually? Pls give your views
Far better than Kashmiri Pandits' exodus and a plethora of terrorist attacks.
After partition history should be revised.ghar wapsi and many solution were possible.turkey completely change after one generation.so here also
All these tensions that we see are the result of minority appeasement. During the constitution law making this point was well brought by one of the member and even Saradar Patel (forgot name) but was overlooked by you know who and we are facing the consequences. As someone else pointed out here the ghar wapsi philosophy was ongoing even during the Gandhi and during the partition, the person was killed and Gandhi words were If Muslims kills you, you shouldn't resist. Also, Indian education is also downplaying and dragging the India growth. Even the bigger names of our time who stand spineless when Nehru was made the PM of India (by Gandhi) are to be held responsible. The point is when a nation is formed, one should only think towards the Building of strong nation, politically, geographically and culturally which didn't happen that derailed the India growth.
Probably less than pakistan because india is a democratic country and all have equal rights
@@tusharsaxena31at least the wars are at the borders... If india and Pakistan were one national then each street would have become a communal zone.
So it is not "FAR BETTER" as u r saying
There is only one reason why I am satisfied that india was partitioned: See the islamic extremism in Bangladesh and Pakistan today. 99% of Hindus in those countries were either forcefully converted or ran to India.
what can you say "hindus are cowered"
@@oldone360 dude piss off
Then Congress was left with 2 options,
1st:- stop partition and let the civil war happen until our weak Police department could have controlled it
2nd:- Accept partition and hope to stop the killing of Hindus in Pakistan and the killing of Muslims in India.
They agreed on the second option and made India secular and a safe place for the remaining Muslims but this decision really failed as Hindus were still crushed in Pakistan and over time Pakistan created a strong army and the Kashmir conflict made these 2 countries strong enemies which were 1 for 1000's of years.
Other than Kashmir, partition failed coz we didn't had complete population exchange
@@Abhishek-ef2er correct complete population exchange was required
Stop partition was the better option.
Today this fight between Hindus and Muslims has gotten so bad that both have nukes pointed at eachother. Therefore no matter how much India achieves in the future. A small fight with pakistan could destroy all that we have achieved.
The creation of pakistan as Abijit Chavda has rightly pointed out was a mistake.
@@Abhishek-ef2er exactly, I agree with you
@@workhardt2 wrong. Read History about muslims you'll understand
Absolutely Correct. The actions of past Indian leaders should be made accountable.
Well spoken, it was never independence, just transfer of power from one set of crooks to another set of crooks.💯💯
#AskAbhijit- Sir, can you say something about Netaji and INA's contribution in India's so called Independence?
INA's contribution? dude, INA gave up their lives to trigger the events that led to our independence. Maj. Gen. G.D. Bakshi, has elaborated on how it was INA that started it all.
@@PS-qv1eh Yes bro i know about that. I just want to get some clear details about it, for that i requested him to make
a video on it.
Sir love your content delivered in few minutes
2:35 onwards Truth, nothing but Truth about gandhi.
🙏sir I like your real special speech. Amazing, I am agree with our political leaders .love you sir
Dear sir , I find your videos to be very enlightening especially during today's times when each and every party is trying to show that it's more nathionalistic then others and actually earlier my mind full of religious hatred but now I think that it is a bit more clear now. You actually talk about real nationalism which I don't think a majority of people of Bharat Varsh know.
This is the most logical analysis and proposition I have come across.
Powerful words sir. Necessary words. Thank you for speaking out 🙏. Is there any way this clip can be shared on social media platforms like FB? People seriously need to watch this.
Veer Savarkar or Subash Chandra Bose are real father of our nation🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
no there is no father of our nation
this is the land of bharat mata
she is a goddess
freedom fighters can't be termed as fathers of a nation
Savarkar did not do anything. I agree that Netaji could be named as the father of our nation, but not Savarkar, since he did not do anything beneficial for the nation's independence
@@theplutonimus don't lie about savarkar, he was a true freedom fighter
@@anujjambhekar8744The true freedom fighter who begged the English for his release and wrote letters to English that he will help them in dividing this nation ? Sure.
@@theplutonimusrubbish where r u drawing your assumptions from what you have read the actual letters when a commission came to see whether savarkar was pleading for mercy the stated don't release the man savarkar wrote petition so did B.r ambedkar , nehru, gandhi, bhagat, ram prasad bismil, all are traitor according to you even CPI wrote to help british some time you have to show compromise what savarkar did just go and study formed avinas bharat society who were included to assassinate every british higher officer in bombay presidency, eg students of him was chafekar bandhu he told young to join british army and learn war tactics and revolt within the army at right time like the sepoy mutiny of 1857 he wanted to repeat that war again such great son of bharti to understand him you need to be patriot first.
Beautiful analogy!
Great and very truthful video
This explanation is very good and looks more practical
Kudos to you sir for opening the eyes of our youth
Chawda sir, loved your analogy and could not agree any more. So true that our independence was put down before the interests of selfish leaders.
I Really felt your opinion 🙌
*best and honest reply by true analyist*
u are awesome sir , i feel very satisfying when i listen to u . thanks for telling truth sir
Great analysis 👏👏
Partition with total population exchange was the best solution
Nice question and analysis
Completely agreed with you Sir!
Sir tried to control the laughter while talking!!! Ooofee the dedication 🎇
#Askabhijit , if bose would have power instesd of nehru then india would be a democracy or dictatorship?
A dictatorship but it would be beneficial
Not exactly a Dictatorship
Something like that
Sardar patel would have been a beeter option...!!
@@aruneshchakraborti7709 i guess not a dictatorship. because he never behaved like one.. he never unnecessarily suppressed anyone for his own personal benifit.
@@esportslobby2440 not exactly a dictator but somehow he would have the supreme power and ofcourse people would enjoy their rights
@@aruneshchakraborti7709 yes that might have been possible, anyways it would have been better than nehru.
Best explaination for best question
Good content brother
In my humble opinion, it was all about dividing power among a few people and partition served the purpose, there would have been no civil war and we would have lived together as one country. Partition increased blood shed, thousands of people died while going to or coming back from East and west Pakistan.
Well said
We Indians are taught to be sahishnu as if it is the greatest virtue. When will we start taking action instead of reacting all the time?
By the way, Mr. Chavda, I so appreciate your lectures and analysis of history. Whether I agree or not, you make me think, and exercise my brain. Thank you very much!
One thing I totally agree with you is British Engineered the partition and also insert a wedge of Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan. May be if this had not happened, we would still be facing some nasty neighborhood in Afganistan and Iran - may be. In the history too this kind of divisions have happened. Pakistan is not eternal, Bharat varsh is.
you are absolutely amazing sir 😊🙏
VERY TRUE ...
Great Abhijit, you explain each concept logically and rationally...keep doing I love watching your video...I will request you to do some video with satya sanatan, atriji, AKTK, sablok tantra, Abhijeet bharti, and more profound String channel..Please do now it is the time to come together all Nationalist people or follower...
Sab LokTantra banned by YT 😤
brilliant brilliant 👏
#Important
Sir please please also tell us the truth and the mystery of King vikramaditya as it is said that he ruled a big region including Arab, Iraq, iran, china, parts of Russia and whole india, and built so many temples in arab as it is mentioned in Bhavishya Purana But some scholars believe that it is just a myth. Sir please make a video on this topic🙏🙏
#AskAbhijit Had Subhas Chandra Bose been involved in the complete process of India's Independence and had been the leader rather than Gandhi, what would have been the results and how big the change would have been in the Timeline of Indian History?
Don't prolong it. End it here.
Thank you Sir.
Nathu ram godse did right!!
In the Book of President, Lincoln stated that he was about to come to India, he asked his mother if he could bring something for her. His mother said, "Bring the sand of Haldighati of that great country, whose king sacrificed his everything for the welfare of his people and loyalty towards his motherland. "
please cite the source
MKG was indeed father of Pakistan who cowardly allowed the partition.
'the final solution' - is OVERDUE
Finally someone said it straight- “getting slapped on cheek after cheek till the attacker is tired” is not courage … it’s exactly what the Brit’s wanted so that fewer Bhagat Singh’s, Chandrasekhar Azad’s, Netajis etc were created… it’s just that the cost of managing such uprisings was significantly higher like in 1857 when if not for the treachery of a few the Brit’s wld have been dealt a serious blow… when your Bhagwat Gita says “that the tormentor is as big a sinner as the one who accepts it”… the country forgot that to take the dictat of a very questionable character portrayed as the father of the nation…
7:05 full clarity. 🙏
You can't separate humans from war bcoz of their greed . The cycle of revenge wil not stop untill one race remains under the leadership of one person
No we humans will still be greedy.
“If the son of Adam had a valley full of gold, he would want to have two valleys. Nothing fills his mouth but the dust of the grave, yet God will relent to whoever repents to Him.” ~ Prophet (PBUH)
2:45 BEST LINE !!
Abhi with all respects to your perspective which are brilliant, Tejas would be a ceremonial aircraft or an air show acrobatic asset until it proves in battle. I would logically stand by AIM on this topic.
#AskAbhijeet
Namaste Sir, I would like to ask if do you any insights on how to Kickstart Indic Renaissance. And your opinions about it, like how it will transform our society? Thanks a lot for imparting knowledge on us. Dhanyawad.🙏🏼
In my history books it is implied that gandhi was in favour of democracy.
Never run before books bro
czcams.com/video/qfwfRCMLXSE/video.html
Just take a look at this video, this is the real Gandhi not what you learn in your books
Good points raised in this video. But there are greater benefits to dealing with these issues today then by people in the past who were not in as strong of a position as we find ourselves today.
India was a much more poor and weak nation during partition. A war may have set us much further back, with far worse problems faced by our people today. its nice to think we can avoid all our problems by a previous civil war. But if we had a war today, we are far better positioned politically, economically, militarily, and have much better science and technology at our disposal, compared to when India gained "interdependence" in1947.
We have a huge population to handle conflict today as well. They just need more love and support to utilize them more effectively. Also there is a need to further unity amongst the South Asian region, as there is too much separation of identity based on faith, region culture, politics etc. (likely the result of Abrahamic faiths/central power structures creating divisions to isolate and weaken people).
Imagine when Bharat decides to prioritize support and unite with Bharti people who have been living overseas. People who can bring with them knowledge, wealth and experience to benefit Bharat as a whole. This is how China became so strong and has gone further then Bharat has been able to do so far as Chinese overseas connect back to the main land bringing support, wealth, knowledge to build their civilization with the support of their government.
We in India and Indians abroad, are in a privileged position comparatively today. That we can sit back and complain about the decisions made by our supposed leaders in the past.
Its better to appreciate what we have today instead of habitually taking everything in life for granted, for perceived fantastical gains from different decision in the past. These decision may not have been available in the way people intend, and would likely had a cascade of offshoot negative consequences which we thankfully do not have to deal with today. The western world including America are in severe decline, with huge civil unrest today. Bharat is on a growth curve, potentially even overtaking China in a few decades if we are mindful in how we act today. Though Bharat has many issues, it is evident there is a sizable educated mass of people who are acting to communicate and work toward addressing the issues. The west keeps making worse decisions by the day, as does China. Opportunities are there for the taking if people want to prioritize making better decisions today to improve the nation and its people 20-30 years from now.
Bharti people do not face any where near the same problems today as we faced during British rule. Thus we are stronger to fight any wars to reclaim our lost territories, and peoples. Create technologies if needed to free the minds of people of Indian decent who have been brainwashed into slavery due to Abrahamic faiths. Educate them on the actual past so they can be better guided.
Many people are misguided by brainwashing and misinformation by slave owners such as Abrahamic faiths. Proper guidance, education, and support can improve a lot of lives in South Asia.
Make decisions today as a people, not depending on our leadership alone, so people are not complaining about the decisions made today like most Bharti people complain about decisions made around 1947 and before.
Not much to be gained by blaming people in history, other then to realize that the people around us today deserve more love and support then they often receive, and the people we have today should not be taken for granted. Buddhism teaches that without having to rely on people to blame on the past.
Love this channel. Love History.
ॐ Peace love meditateॐ
Research: Transcendental mediation and Buddhism.
Work towards Akhanda Bharat.
We have a right to criticize as the people of India were not asked whether they accepted partition or not.So much money is now invested in military.If partition had not happened we could have invested more on education,healthcare and we could have got trade access with central Asia.
Great
#askAbhijit Your Thoughts on Tilak and Sawarkar. As in my opinion they were true hero’s of independence
*But Sir American Civil war was fought in the 1800s...back then there were not a looming copd war like 1947. The two opposing sides wouldnt have fought freely one to one.*
The Indian side would probably fought with Soviet help and the opposing sides would be probably helped by uk and us like always, would come to their aid.
Wouldnt then the situation be like North and South Korea devide?
#AskAbhijit - Are there any legal immigrants from Bangladesh in India, specifically the ones who got refuge in India before the Liberation War was settled ?
The father of the Usa ( imo as an american) is George Washington. Abraham is more the son. Or Uncle Sam. Great Video. Im here learning some of India's history.
Chavda ji is absolutely straight forward.... 😂
Why Indian politician s unable to implement compulsory population exchange which was implemented in Greek , turkey partition in 1920 without loosing a life,where as India' s partition lead to killing of 25 lakhs of Hinduse?
Even partition killed more than millions of people, a full fledged civil war would also resulted in the same, but ig that civil war might have prevented the most bizarre line in the Indian subcontinent.
Who are the most responsible personalitys in partition on INDIA
Not because of Gandhi we got Independence it's because of Subash Chandra Bose's INA After Partition some of INA soldiers who were muslims who went back and served the Pak Army who later illegally captured some part of Kashmir If Subash Chandra Bose would be our PM in 1947 our country would be united and peaceful and he had many great policies which would have been implemented to make our nation superpower long before
This channel deserves 10 million subscribers...better than dancing girls...abusive teenagers and day to day life vloggers
All the great powerful countries of the world today have been born out of a bloody civil war in the past. The French Revolution of 1789-94, the American Civil War in the 1860s, the Russian Bolshevik Revolution of 1917-23, the Chinese Communist Revolution of 1945-49, even the Spanish Civil War of 1936-39 (though Spain is not a great power today) etc. These events transformed the respective nations, inculcating among its citizens an imperative need for unification rather than fragmentation.
To achieve something, you have to pay for it. Nothing comes from nothing. Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose understood this, and he said "Give me your blood, and I will give you freedom." But India chose the pacifist way of Gandhi and Nehru, and in fact condescended into becoming a sort vassal state of its earlier ruler the Great Britain, with fragmentation of its territory, turning brothers into enemies (Pakistan). That is our tragedy.
Today after 75 years of our independence, we are still considered as a third-world poor country by the world at large. Though sometimes some half-hearted compliments are paid, to serve their own interests. Therefore we need another reawakening, re-establishment of truly independent sovereign state. Until then...
1:35
He is really father of the nation
💯💯💯💯
I feel the pain when you said the great great ...
Sir please write your blogs on the same subjects
#askabhijit what is ur take on direct action day on Bengal could that have been avoided?
Sir, what you think about Netaji and his death mystery?
Exactly
I totally agree with you
Theres a account on Instagram called the better india and he is glorifying this british puppet go and tell them the truth and report the post.
Please recommend me book regarding this
If a war eventually took place between India and Pakistan, what did the partition achieve?
#AskAbhijit in conflict with USA and Russia or USA and China will India remain neutral or take any side
sir i love ur sarcasm when u take names🤣🤣🤣
I am proud to say that I share my birthday with Abraham Lincoln (12th February)
#AskAbhijit - is there any one percent change that India and Pakistan reunion?
sir .... apne mre man ke baat keh die ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
I like the way you consistently menntion shri with Nehru
The way sir says mohandas Gandhi did not believe in democracy is savage 😁
#AskAbhijit if gandhi did not believed in democracy what type of government he wanted for India?
Read about legend subhash chandra bose