Are Ashkenazic Jews the Real Khazars?
Vložit
- čas přidán 9. 09. 2023
- The "Khazar Theory" has become very popular in some circles in recent years. I've done some extensive research over the last few months to investigate whether this theory holds any weight or not.
You can investigate the sources I used in my research here: shorturl.at/oqzK3
Follow the "I'm All Over the Place" podcast here: allovertheplace.buzzsprout.com
Purchase tickets to my D.C. Show (October 15th at Blues Alley) here: www.instantseats.com/index.cf...
Be sure to join the Patreon at / darastarrtucker
Learn more about my music and how you can support this channel below:
www.linktr.ee/daratuckerb
/ darastarrtucker
/ darastarrtucker
/ darastarrtucker
/ daratuckerb
/ darastarrtucker
www.darastarrtucker.com
"Those who claim to be Jews, but are not." Yep.
That's meant about Catholicism , claiming they replace Israel.
Catholics never "claimed" to be Jews@@musicfunlax1224
@@pamstreet3647 That was written to the church in Smyrna . Jews were persecuting Christians than. Most of the persecution came from Jews. Later on it was the RKK that persecuted .
😂 that had nothing to do with Catholicism
I wonder if that black woman knows the jews were the real slave traders that brought the black slaves to America and here she is covering up for them? Pure ignorance!🤦♂️🤦♂️😂😂
They done a study of DNA samples from Ashkenazi Jew's and found a large number of them have ancestry that goes back to Europe not Israel.
Thats incorrect.
Not true at all
@@ughhstuff True
@@KennyPurpleRain True
They done? Who? When?
How ironic is it the DNA tests are illegal in Israel!! Ponder that and think about why? If they test as strictly European and Khazars, they are not originally from Canaan and have absolutely no claim to the land
What a stupid lie. The Israelis have no need to prove to anyone that they are descended from the Jews of ancient Israel. The legal basis for their nationhood is the UN decision to partition Palestine and establish a Jewish State.
But DNA testing has shown that Jews, not just Israeli Jews, are in fact descended from the ancient Hebrews. This testing was done as part of a major study involving 17,000 Jews from al over the world, who agreed to have their DNA tested.
Can you idiots stop spreading obvious lies? Not sure who the idiot was who spread this lie but it's completely false in every way. DNA tests are not illegal in Israel. This video even shows you that there are genetic links between Ashkenazi and Sephardi Jews. So that proves that we are all Jews. Stop with the lies.
You watched this video and took nothing away from it.
@@purplemarsmotionpictureswhat’s the percentage of Levantine/Cannanite/Hebrew ancestry of the Ashkenazi Jews? Riddle me that Batman 😂😂😂😂😂
@@ricolaw103350 percent about, look it up. They are from middle Eastern men who married European woman, and have J haplogroup.
Just take a Look at them!Do they Look middle eastern,No! They Look Slavic ,Russian,Polish,they did not come from middle east
They came from slavic countries and they are descendants of canaanites phoenicians converted into Judaism and slavic people
Canaanite’s are black people
You don't know what you're talking about. But you do know what you're trying to spread: hatred of Jews leading to genocide against them.
If they weren't really Jews, why did they not inform the Nazis of this, and save themselves from the Holocaust? Why, when the Nazis treated them as Jews, did they accept that identity and die for it?
Ah yes, the "just look at them" school of geniology. Must be nice, you don't have to read anything (I know how you people feel about reading). Just declare that people are whatever you think they look like.
@@Ermek57 (random gibberish)
I've learned many things and one of those things is there is a whole lot of things someone doesn't want certain knowledge to become common knowledge.
do you have any evidence to counter anything she said?
The knowledge is out here people don’t want to know because most of their ego and history was built off lies
Why would these ppl tell the world the people who are suppose to be inferior to them brought them civilizations during the GOLDEN AGE that’s not mentioned because it would show AFRIKAs superiority over all other nations
She didn't really say anything, she just said that other people had refuted things other people said; but she's citing conclusions and not evidence to prove a negative. Making the whole video just smoke. I'm not any more informed after watching this than before. All I know is that she and other people have concluded a thing.@@commoncure3335
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
If you paid attention, she said, there wasn't substantial proof of khazarian lineage because the "khazars intermixed with the people around them and dissappeared." At the same time showing you a map with Ashkenazia and Arnenia around them. Then going on to say, there were no genetic markers of Ashkenazis and Georgians and Armenians. If the Khazars disappeared magically, wouldn't there still be genetic markers in Armenians and the people around them ie. Turks also? Wouldn't these people be mixed with Ukranians, Polocks, Slavic, Russian etc.? Then saying these are the people that migrated through Europe as "jews." A big circle for those that know and confusion for those that don't. Europeans. East or west are considered white. Maybe just a case of white on white crime🤷🏽♂️
There are Jewish Professors in Jerusalem that have written many books about not being really Hebrews.
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
Can you name a few? I'm interested
👀
@@Nat.173 She named them
@@Nat.173 Nah she didn't get censored she named three of them. She called them a small group of writers and Scholars that have been debunked. Shlomo Sand, Paul Wexler & Eran Elhaik. I don't know if there's many more than that but I know Noam Chomsky also agrees with Shlomo Sand. Maybe it is a myth, I have no clue but Noam Chomsky is far from a conspiracy theorist or some fringe scholar. I only looked this up because I was watching someone interview Chomsky and they asked if the Khazar theory is anti semitic & he said "No, it's a matter of fact".
Khazaria is geographically the region of Gog and Magog in Holy Scripture. This topic is a Pandora’s Box..literally
Can please explain more
@@mohamedaminabdi7861 it's gibberish. There's no explanation.
#Trump #Diamond+Silk evil= Israel not good or gods jews but devil army = IDF = israel
@@mohamedaminabdi7861Look up Benjamin H Freedman
@@MistahMatzah says the Gentile!!
Funny how the Yiddish language is used to refute the theory of Khazar origin but not the middle eastern origin,
very funny that the hebrew words they have are mainly related to selling/buying . Slavic grammar and old german dialect words...but yeahhhhh, the are from the M-E LOL
Why is it funny? Yiddish has a significant Hebrew component, and uses Hebrew script.
@@MistahMatzah Jibberish
Middle East?
You mean south western Asia?
@@williamwinn2114 Yiddish ( a Diaspora language) is middle high German with loan words from Hebrew, Aramaic and Slavic.Yiddish is written in Hebrew.
So we are just going to forget about Ethiopian jews? Hate to break it to you but this video seems quite biased. It is widely accepted that the Khazar elite converted to Judaism and at later stages other members of the kingdom. To assume these people just disappeared after being taken over by Kievan Rus is ignorant. Its a sensitive topic which is quite heavily censored and hidden from the public. There are many academic studies for people to view and I urge people to not makeup your mind over a skewed 12 minute video that reeks of propaganda.
So true, its exactly what i thought👉 "There are many academic studies for people to view and I urge people to not makeup your mind over a skewed 12 minute video that reeks of propaganda."
what i want to say you've said my friend but this is to shows the lengths that some people are willing go to hide the truth and rewrite history this young lady sounds like an accredited historian in the field and malonated at that SHE SHOULD KNOW BETTER
Sephardic scholar Judah Halevi wrote about the Khazar converts in 1139 A.D.
Ethiopian Jews are Jews through Solomon. Ashkenazi Jews on the other hand are just white people playing dress up in small hats.
They are practicing HASBARA Zionist propaganda.
Ironic they can’t track the history but can for everything else
I said the same thing, what a coincidence right. Lol
John 1 v 12: But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
13 Which were born, NOT OF BLOOD, NOR of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of GOD
Another interesting fact is that DNA testing is illegal...🤔
The original jews who lived in kingdom of Israel in the north and kingdom of Yahuda in the south has been wiped by Assyrians and Babylon so the theory that Khazara who converted to Judaism then migrated to Europe must be the ancestors of the ashkenazi and sephardic , whole genome sequencing should answer that question but I heard jews are reluctant to investigate as everything about them is full of lies even their torah is not Moses torah it is made up by 72 priests 1000 years after Moses done at Alexandria library in Egypt.
Ashkenazi Jews are a Jewish ethnic group that originated in Central and Eastern Europe. They are one of the largest Jewish communities in the world, with about half of Jewish people around the world identifying as Ashkenazi. The origins of Ashkenazi Jews have been debated for a long time, but recent genetic studies have shed some light on their history. According to a study published in Cell, the largest study to date of ancient DNA from Jewish individuals, the modern Ashkenazi population formed as a mix of two distinct subgroups: one with greater Middle Eastern ancestry, which may represent Jews with origins in Western Germany, and another with greater Eastern and Central European ancestry. The study also revealed that the medieval Ashkenazi population originated from an extremely small set of founders. While Ashkenazi Jews have Hebrew roots, their genetic makeup is a result of a complex history of migrations, admixture, and founder effects.
The Khan (King) of Khazars was under the political and military pressure from both Constantinople representing the Eastern Roman Empire, thus Christianity (ie. 'Byazantium') and from Baghdad Khalifate, representing the Islam.
Both were looking over Khazars as they do not have a so-called 'monoteistic religion' and the Khan decided to send envoys to both capitals to obtain further information related with their religions.
After listening multiple delegations, they understood that if any of these religions are adopted by the state, Khazars would get under the political influence of either Christianity, or conversely of Islam, where either case comes with its own issues, obligations, alliance structures, taxation, etc., and Khazars could only be extensions of these capitals from that point onward.
Judaism was the only religion at that time without any political power, also was a monoteistic belief; in addition the ancester of the other two. Khazars decided that by adopting Judaism they could refute any religious or politiical pressures from these powerful capitals, and could retain their independence, also staf away from the never-ending middle-east conflicts.
This is a high-level decision given by the 'nomenklatura' (in Russian, this term refers to staff members working at any level of the state structure; while in English it has a different meaning). Its effects cascading down to people's level could be observed in subsequent decades, even in centuries.
Please note that names of the dynasty in final times of Seljuki Empire (which is the successor of Khazars) have Jewish names, which contradicts with the information you are presenting in this video.
Prof. Şahin Uçar have videos as a historian on this matter in Turkish language (ie. "Hazar Kağanı Bulan Hanın Unutulmuş Rüyalarına Çağdaş Yorumlar").
Regards...
Keep spitting facts you didn’t even get into how the were slave traders and mixed with the (Byzantium) Rome and Spanish Empire helped them fund slavery
thanks for mentioning this... the modern "jews' are not semites at all... it's a modern sect... more known now days as zionists...😅
The truth will prevail . It’s just a question of time.
Thank you for giving the source 🙏
Hello,
I don't know if you read my comment. Ancient Sumerians did not speak Semitic or Indo-European languages. They spoke a language very close to the Turkish spoken today. According to one theory, the prophet Abraham was a Sumerian priest. Therefore, your DNA may be linked to Turks. And no Turkish tribe eats pork. (Before Islam) some Sumerian customs still live in Turkey. Like Sumerian wedding customs. I do not know the situation in the Central Asian Turkish states. The second option is that the founders of Turkish states are generally from the same lineage and they are called the Ashina tribe. I do not know whether the Ashina tribe founded the Khazar Empire. Again, your Turkish DNA may come from there.
The kazar lineage just disappeared huh?
Slice the cake however you wish, but the jew-ish people are not the Israelites of the Bible/Torah. They are converts from European descent. They are not Semites so the idea of calling people who appose them anti-semites is foolish. Their claim to the land of Palestine, now called Israel is rooted in false hoods and trickery.
100#. You got it.
Keep speaking up.
Palestinians own the land.
Truth
Correct
Wrong it was Canaan 1,000s years earlier 😂
Thank you
I took a DNA test and it told me where I come from why don't they just take the same test
Some have and they found out their origins were not from there.
Dna testing is also illegal in israel
@@Abstract.Noir414 I thought Israel was a democracy
Because according to Jewish traditions it won't be accurate because Jewish is passed by the mom not the father .lol see how that gets lost fast
Bcuz it's ILLEGAL to take or have a DNA test done in Israel without a very good reason & government approval.
@@komlat253 But the Bible runs down the names of all the fathers down through the sons, every time it gives the "Genealogy" of someone. That's a lil bit odd, in my opinion... In reality, They're checking the level of inbred genetics visible after centuries of inbreeding and then claiming these markers are - The "Genetic Evidence" -- Which it is, just not of being a Semite or Hebrew.
Say a lie long enough and future generations will believe it as fact.
Whats the lie?
Im Christian and I have zero ties to the holy land. I do not believe that you have to be Israeli to be jewish..That being said ive read many articles stating that the Khazars were followers of Baal and due to the evil deeds they committed ( road bandits, child sacrifice, etc.) they were made to adopt an Abramic religion by the Russian kings. But they didnt really adopt those religions they merely mingled it with their own satanic religion....The ones that stayed true to their satanic beliefs are sitting in the Vatican, at the head of the banking industry, our federal Reserve, and also planted themselves in the political structure of most countries....Not all are of Khazarian origin. Many are just greedy, lust for power or are being blackmailed....This makes more sense considering the goings on in our world today.
If you read somewhere such claims, perhaps you need to read more and from more sources.
Excellent analysis.
No evidence or records that Indicate any large number of khazars converted to Judaism or any of the other abrahamic religion, although there probably were people of different faiths within the region. The Russian kingdom didn't really exist at the time, other than as a vassel state of the Mongolian khanate.
Historians consider 988 as the year of Christianity adoption in Russia. Having been baptized, Vladimir baptized his boyars and later all his people.
Joseph Reinach, a French Jewish member of parliament who was opposed to Zionism, dismissed the idea, arguing that Jews descended from Israelites were a tiny minority. In his view, conversion had played a major role in the expansion of the Jewish people, and, in addition, he claimed, the majority of "Russian, Polish and Galician Jews descend from the Khazars, a Turkish people. who converted to Judaism en masse at the time of Charlemagne.
ok if we Ashkenazi are Khazars
you forget this
if you convert to Judaism
than you are an official Jewish
Actually thought her research and commentary were thought provoking now not so much
@YousifBoti-kw2sk👎 No. Once you have a conversion to Judaism you are a Jew and people have been converting to Judaism for thousands of years.
Agreed. She does not "dot the i's" or "cross the t's." The presentation is more a sophomoric rehash of "points-of-view" than persuasive. I do believe her intent is honest, it just fails. @@jamesmadden7604
The problem with that whole theory is genetics . I'm European and have done a DNA test , don't have AJ DNA but here and there DNA matches with people that have Ashkenazi DNA . What's noticeable they have NEVER Turkic NDA , but instead North-African, Iberian , Italian, Greec, East- Eur. DNA . What you would expext when they , according to history were descendants from the Jewish slaves , captured in 70 AD by Rome. Also: czcams.com/video/WnGm_62F9OE/video.html
Notice she mentioned nothing of the Bible or actual Israelites… abecause that would totally dismantle this whole raggedy video 🤷🏽♂️
The world follows fables
Jews are the actual Israelites.
Sorry, not sorry.
She starts wth that disclaimer
wonder why?
We all know how evidence can be hidden or destroyed and to say none exists is simply an understatement.
not with dna
Really pushing it?
I will never forget the day my langauge teacher told us Yiddish was actually a modern langauge coming from German territory.
Blew my mind!
Are they descendants of Isaac and Jacob? In Islam, the definition of Israelites is the people descended from children of Jacob who is the son of Isaac. The term Jews or Yahud in Arabic is specific to the descendants of Yehuda, 3rd son of Jacob's 1st wife. But today the term Yahud or Jew is used for everyone claiming to practice Judaism and supposedly come from the lineage of Jacob. I didn't imagine anyone can be Jew unless they're descended from that tree, so yes if the theory were true that Khazarias made up of all Ashkenazis, they are not Jews at all. Not one bit.
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼thank you! Anyone these days practicing Judaism can now refer to themselves as Jews/Yahud where at point in day's of old this right would have been prohibited because if you were deemed a gentile then you would have never been to be taught the law let alone stake your claim to their birthrights at any rate this day & age we use different criteria to evaluate birthright Yahudites & one is PROPHECY because it's all that was left untainted & it pretty much states' that the lives of the Israelites should be consistent w/ the professed prophecy against them because it was breathed out the mouth of the most high & evaluating that prophecy the Jews weren't enslaved for a period of 400 year's 🤨How many years did the Holocaust last?
The Holocaust technically lasted for four years, from 1941 until 1945. However, even before 1941, there were strong feelings of anti-semitism in Germany."
homework.study.com/explanation/how-many-years-did-the-holocaust-last.html
😡 Now on the other hand...
Over the period of the Atlantic Slave Trade, from approximately 1526 to 1867, some 12.5 million captured men, women, and children were put on ships in Africa, and 10.7 million arrived in the Americas.
How long did the Atlantic slave trade last in years? OVER 400 years
www.un.org/en/observances/decade-people-african-descent/slave-trade#:~:text=International%20Day%20of%20Remembrance%20of%20the%20Victims%20of%20Slavery%20and,darkest%20chapters%20in%20human%20history.
&
www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-resources/historical-context-facts-about-slave-trade-and-slavery#:~:text=Over%20the%20period%20of%20the,all%20long%2Ddistance%20global%20migrations.
AND THE BOMBSHELL WHAT DID BIBLICAL PROPHECY SAY THEY WOULD BE TRANSPORTED ON???“And יהוה shall bring you back to Mitsrayim in SHIPS, BY a way of which I said to you, ‘You are never to see it again.’ And there YOU SHALL BE SOLD TO YOUR ENEMIES as male and female slaves, but NO ONE TO BUY.”
Deḇarim (Deuteronomy) 28:68
*some 12.5 million captured men, women, and children were PUT ON SHIPS in Africa
PROPHECY ISN'T FLAWED OR INACCURATE BUT PEOPLE'S VERSION OF IT IS NOW IN THAT SCRIPTURE EGYPT WAS BROUGHT UP AS TO WHERE THEY'D RETURN TO 🤔
PAY ATTENTION...
What does the pyramid symbolizes?
Pyramids today stand as a reminder of the ancient Egyptian GLORIFICATION of life after death
Charles Thomson - a designer of the GREAT SEAL - said it represented “STRENGTH and duration.”
JUST LIKE EGYPT IS NOT AMERICA ALSO WELL KNOWN FOR HOW IT ENSLAVED AFRICANS???
What is the biggest slave trade of all time?
The Atlantic Slave Trade
www.gilderlehrman.org/history-resources/teacher-resources/historical-context-facts-about-slave-trade-and-slavery#:~:text=Over%20the%20period%20of%20the,all%20long%2Ddistance%20global%20migrations.
🤔Why Bibles Given to Slaves Omitted Most of the Old Testament
www.history.com/news/slave-bible-redacted-old-testament
* DONE BY THE HISTORY CHANNEL SO THEIR NOT EXAGGERATING THE FACTS
Funny thing to know perhaps, but Arabs don't get to decide who is Jewish. Jews do.
yes. God's people the lost tribe of Israel are not called Jews. If you understand where the set of Satan is at, you can understand where the people are coming from. Remember Satan is the ruler of this system of things look who rules the financial world. if you understand the khazarians you also know how they would rob and take their identity. for this to work they would have to hide and lie who they really were. they worship Saturn just look at the so-called star of Dave. They are the Pharisees . yahudin are not jews
@ unanimous.verdict
Jews accept conversions.
But they do not actively
proselytize. They believe
that if you are meant to
join the Jewish religion
(become part of the tribe)
then God will lead you to
that place of taking
instruction.
DNA evidence proves
that Ashkenazi and
Sephardic Jews have
the same male
ancestor as the
Arabs living in the
Levant
Abraham --> Issac (Sarah)
Abraham --> Ishmael (Hagar)
Ishmaelites and Edomites
(sons of Esau) are now
known as Arabs.
Abraham --> Issac -->
Issac and Rebecca had 2 sons (twins)
Issac --> Esau (later called Edom --Means red)
Issac --> Jacob (later called "Israel")
Esau married Canaanite
women and also (later) a
granddaughter of
Ishmael
Genesis 10:3.
Well, the Bible says that Azkenazi is not of the line of Shem. They are from the line of Japheth. Therefore, being negative to them wouldn’t be anti-Semite.
The Ashkenazi Jews are NOT descended from Ashkenaz in the Book of Genesis. That's a misconception. In the same way, American Indians like the Sioux, Apache, Ojibwe, Ohlone, Seminole, and Mohawk tribes are not from India, just because they're called Indians.
Ashkenaz in the bible is just a geographical location...they say nothing of ashkenazi jews bcs they didnt exist yet...dna has corrorborated ashkenazim are indeed of levant origin...the khazars wouldve been east asian looking, just like kazakhs or kyrgyz, the whole thing is nonsense
@@paulofassman5657😂😂😂😂 so you all are using the Bible as comparison to a mistake made by Cristobal Colon? Comical. Ashkenazis are descendants of Ashkenaz.
@@davemyer4854Yes, and Ashkenaz is a decendant of Japheth. Not Shem.
@@josevilla943 you're right. I was actually agreeing with you, not them. Shalom Uvr'aka!
Who sponsored this video?
Any type of serious research
@@ughhstuffJews*
The Khazarians that don't want to be known
@@ughhstuffKhazar Jews existed. Ashkenazi intermarrying with Europeans is a very real phenomenon. Ethnic Jewish people have strong genetic commonalities with 90% of West Asia
using facts Vs facts, not who sponsored this video!
There are some Italians living in Australia therefore all Italians come from Australia
maybe all humans come from, other humans?
Close...😂.but outside of Athens, more Greeks live in Melbourne than any other city 🤣
@@je-freenorman7787yeah and this is where they come from: *"the word-play is so obvious, and the association of Japheth with Shem ("dark") and Ham ("black") suggests a name on similar lines--either gentilic, or descriptive of race. Japheth has therefore been explained as meaning "fair," from yaphah, the non-Sem and non-Hamitic races known to the Jews being all more or less whiteskinned."* International Standard Bible Encyclopedia (1939)
@@exposeevil5492 thank you
pleaae confirm with reference?
@@exposeevil5492 so, now I can be Anti-Hamitic? I wonder if thats against the law?
The Sister Is An Agent -
Felt the same, uncomfortable vibes.
She is
Right. That means she's no Sister of ours then.
Definitely. She don't understand why these ppl have to hide in plain sight.
Yeah, she’s a tool. She’s ignoring thousands of years That Clearly show the original Israelites were African. She should do a video on Native, i mean negro/ i mean/ African American people. SMH.
You guys make this to hard. They are Ashkenazi Jews, descendants of Ashkenaz who is from Gomer, who is from Japeth. They are not Israelites and have no biblical claim to the current land they occupy.
Real
So with that logic, African-American are native Americans right?
When someone says African American it is to say that it is someone of African descent who grew up in America (several generations). That doesn't mean they are Native Americans. The same with Ashkenazi Jews. Ashkenazi Jews are called that to say which region they come from - Ashkenaz region. This does not mean they are native German or European. Of course, as more and more generations passed, communities slowly began to mix with each other. This creates "new DNA" but it does not contradict the original origin.
@@user-vl5fl6jw4n The mistake you are making is using a term African American. That term was started by Jesse Jackson.
Incorrect. Medieval Jews used the names of the descendants of Noah to refer to entire countries. Ashkenaz was used since the 10th Century to refer to Germany and, later, France. There is no literal descent from Gomer or Ashkenaz intended - you are taking only the parts of our history that support your claims and ignoring (or more likely, genuinely ignorant of) how the term arose. Jews were already calling Germany "Ashkenaz" when Khazaria was still in existence.
It wasn't until later that a Karaite scholar connected the Khazars to Ashkenaz based on Biblical accounts linking Ashkenaz to a nomadic people who attacked Armenia. The two usages are unrelated - the Karaites had almost no contact with Europe.
They are not descendant of the sons of Ashkenaz, but descants of people from towns in Turkey bordering Georgia .
Very well presented. Thank you
Ms. Tucker - Thank you for a well-done, well-researched video as well as the links to your sources.
I found this after a debate Noam Chomsky was in. He was certain that Khazar theory is not antisemitic
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
I saw that too. 💯
@@TBD3.0it isn't
caucasians were never slaves in Egypt
Same .literally was the next video😂
I read in some comment somewhere that the warrior class of khzars converted for convenience so that during the crusades they didn't have to pick sides. Any way to research this? The crusades were very disruptive even to Jews where they ever they were. But being able to claim neutrality for a couple of hundred years might have given any converts enough time to like the change enough to stick with it and then as generations followed it remained as " the way we are"
There aren't good records. The Khazars themselves didn't leave behind archives that survived.
Bulan was a Khazar king who led the conversion of the Khazars to Judaism. His name means "elk" or "hart" in Old Turkic. The date of his reign is unknown, as the date of the conversion is hotly disputed, though it is certain that Bulan reigned some time between the mid-
So are you gonna do a video like this for the "Out of Africa Theory"?
Theory? Out of Eden (Africa) reality more like.
The out of Africa theory is widely accepted as the origins of humanity, with modern humans being descended from a type of ape in populations of a few tens to dozens of thousand.
@@ShowemRightHaplogroup DE YAP+ has an out of Asia theory
It never happened. Don't rely on activists to teach you history or you'll look stupid which is what the political agenda is partially about, making you look stupid. The biggest proponent of "Out of Africa" was Professor Chris Stringer has finally admitted that the theory of "Out of Africa" couldn't be possible after the Gnome studies in masse that have been taking place for the last 30 years. Professor Stringer is literally the "father" of Out of Africa. Do a search for "New DNA Research Changes Origin of Human Species" - that will explain the latest findings using DNA to trace everything back to it's known origin at this time. We started all over the planet at roughly the same time and interbred with other humaniod species. This is what changed Professor Stringers mind. He openly states that he was wrong about it and now has continued down the path of tracing Gnome for our answers. Here's an interesting thing about blacks. You have what they call a "Ghost gene". the other races have their origins mapped back to other humanoids. Blacks have one gene that we have no record of! For instance Asians are a combination of Denisovans and Cro-Magnon. But Blacks are a combination of 3 different types of ancestors one of which has not been recorded to this date in time. Thats fascinating... Search this "Modern Humans Once Mated with Other Species" and this "Homo sapiens reevaluated: Why the definition of ‘modern human’ is undergoing a revamp". and this "Ancient humans procreated with at least four other species" .. Here's Professor Stringer saying it himself "chris stringer rethinking "out of africa" search that and you'll get a link to Edge.org with the current science --- Anytime you find someone pushing woke ideas you'll not find the truth... doesn't matter if it's white woke or black woke... it's political and has nothing to do with reality. This activist in this channel has no intention of being honest... low self esteme will do that but you by no means need to make up your hieratige because you still have incredible things to find out about the black history ... like "Ghost Gene" .. I think that is the most interesting thing that science has uncovered in the last 20 years. Good luck.
The meaning of the term “Ashkenaz” and the geographical origins of AJs and Yiddish are some of the longest standing questions in history, genetics, and linguistics. In our previous work we have identified “ancient Ashkenaz,” a region in northeastern Turkey that harbors four primeval villages whose names resemble Ashkenaz. Here, we elaborate on the meaning of this term and argue that it acquired its modern meaning only after a critical mass of Ashkenazic Jews arrived in Germany. We show that all bio-localization analyses have localized AJs to Turkey and that the non-Levantine origins of AJs are supported by ancient genome analyses. Overall, these findings are compatible with the hypothesis of an Irano-Turko-Slavic origin for AJs and a Slavic origin for Yiddish and contradict the predictions of Rhineland hypothesis that lacks historical, genetic, and linguistic support (Table 1).
One argument Eurocentric Christianity like to make is that Israelites look “Middle Eastern” or “olive”, but we know from the Bible that’s not True.
Tacitus is one more nail in the coffin.
“A few authorities hold that in the reign of Isis the surplus population of Egypt was evacuated to neighboring lands under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Judas. Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king. There are some who say that a motley collection of landless Assyrians occupied a part of Egypt, and then built cities of their own, inhabiting the lands of the Hebrews and the nearer parts of Syria…” - Tacitus, Histories 5.2-5
Tacitus described Hebrew origins as possibly Egyptian or Ethiopian. This is important because it puts perspective an Old Testament Bible verse:
“Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?” - Amos 9:7
Tacitus words present a huge problem for those that teach a European / light / olive Egypt because we know for a fact that Ethiopians are not European. There’s no logical reason anyone would ever confuse a European with an Ethiopian. In addition to the Old Testament clarification, Tacitus also confirms an incident in the New Testament.
The importance of the Testimony of Tacitus is that he was a European (Roman) historian, and he is often quoted by Europeans as a credible source of history. Tacitus lived from (55 A.D. - 117 A.D.), which overlaps the lifetime of the apostle Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D.
“Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38
Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D.
“Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38 have been mistaken for an Egyptian, nor would the guard have assumed he didn’t speak Greek, and the people in the time of Tacitus wouldn’t have mistaken them for Egyptians and Ethiopians.
In his book ,The Great Roman-Jewish War: 66-70, the Roman historian, Flavius Josephus, stated over thousands of years ago, that the Israelites migrated into Africa. He writes:
“Millions of Jews fled into Africa, among other places, fleeing from Roman persecution and starvation during the siege.”
This is just one example of the migration.
*Once the Israelites migrated to West Africa, they established communities all through-out Africa.*
One of those communities was the Kingdom of Juda.
As mentioned in the Bible and in history, there was a Kingdom in Israel, called the Kingdom of Judah.
Jew comes from the name Judah.
That being said, one of the largest slave ports in West Africa, where many of our ancestors were stolen from was labeled the Kingdom of Juda.
Below is a 1747 map of Africa, created by an English cartographer named Edward Bowen(1693 or 1694-1767). This map, shows specifically where the ancestors of many African Americans come from.
HOW ISAAC TOOK REBEKA TO WIFE.
Flavius Josephus. The Works of Flavius Josephus. Translated by. William Whiston, A.M. Auburn and Buffalo. John E. Beardsley. 1895
238] ABRAHAM after this married Keturah, by whom six sons were born to him, men of courage, and of sagacious minds: Zambran, and Jazar, and Madan, and Madian, and Josabak, and Sous. Now the sons of Sous were Sabathan and Dadan. The sons of Dadan were Latusim, and Assur, and Luom. The sons of Madiau were Ephas, and Ophren, and Anoch, and Ebidas, and Eldas. Now, for all these sons and grandsons, Abraham contrived to settle them in colonies; and they took possession of Troglodytis, and the country of Arabia the Happy, as far as it reaches to the Red Sea. It is related of this Ophren, that he made war against Libya, and took it, and that his grandchildren, when they inhabited it, called it (from his name) Africa. And indeed Alexander Polyhistor gives his attestation to what I here say; who speaks thus: "Cleodemus the prophet, who was also called Malchus, who wrote a History of the Jews, in agreement with the History of Moses, their legislator, relates, that there were many sons born to Abraham by Keturah: nay, he names three of them, Apher, and Surim, and Japhran. That from Surim was the land of Assyria denominated; and that from the other two (Apher and Japbran) the country of Africa took its name, because these men were auxiliaries to Hercules, when he fought against Libya and Antaeus; and that Hercules married Aphra's daughter, and of her he begat a son, Diodorus; and that Sophon was his son, from whom that barbarous people called Sophacians were denominated."
Just look up the lines of Japeth and it should become clear to you.
That's the problem, the bible isn't a big deal anymore. You need a better source, you can't just wave your stick around and yell expecto patronum and expect me to believe that you actually went to Hogward's school of 🧙♀️ and 🧙♂️... We know that the Mayan's were here and they didn't need a Harry Potter and the parted sea sequel to prove it... 👇
@@corruptafricanpoliticianc.3831 the Bible is the main source, without its oral history written down, no one would have knowledge of most historical events. You’re entitled to have your opinions, but I find it interesting that the people who want nothing to do with the Bible have the most to say about it.
Very weak arguments when you bother to cross examine them.
But the greatest problem they face: genetic testing shows most Ashkenazis can trace back to the middle east around the time of Israel, AND they have next to none of the genetic markers tracing to the Turks or khazar region.
The mass conversation there just didn't happen as you reported.
@@adrianbundy3249who’s genetic testing? Can you link your source?
“You will never be able to live here in peace, because you left here black and came back white” Gamal Abdel(1952) 2nd President of Egypt Gamal Nasser
AND LEAVE HERE REDDISH PINKISH BEINGS.
The problem is that the Ashkenazi Jews look totally different than the Sephardic ones. The former look Turkic, the latter look Middle Eastern.. They of course intermingled, so often there is a mixture of both features. The Jews had a tendency of infiltrate great powers for protection, so it's conceivable that they did so into the Khazar empire, which was a great power at the time.
About the names: Kagan-Kaganovich, the name of a Khazar ruler, language: the Bulgars switched their language to Slavic in the 7th century, so being so sanguine in the arguments don't make it true.
Neat, you think you can tell someone's genetic legacy by their appearance. No Turk has EVER told me I look Turkish.
Read Genome Biology and Evolution by Dr Eran Elhaik, a geneticist at the John Hopkins School of public health. Accoring to him present European Jews are Turkish people which strongly support the Khazarian hypothesis. Also read the 13 tribes by Arthur Koestler. Koestler calculated that jews could not be 8 million in eastern europe without the Khazar.
Eran Elhaik used Armenian and Georgian Dna as a substitute for Turkic dna and was severely chastised by his peers for his methodology.
Between the 1100's and 1300's various polish Kings inacted laws favorable to Jews an Jews of this law and Casimir the great reinforced these existing laws and invited Jews to Poland.
The meaning of the term “Ashkenaz” and the geographical origins of AJs and Yiddish are some of the longest standing questions in history, genetics, and linguistics. In our previous work we have identified “ancient Ashkenaz,” a region in northeastern Turkey that harbors four primeval villages whose names resemble Ashkenaz. Here, we elaborate on the meaning of this term and argue that it acquired its modern meaning only after a critical mass of Ashkenazic Jews arrived in Germany. We show that all bio-localization analyses have localized AJs to Turkey and that the non-Levantine origins of AJs are supported by ancient genome analyses. Overall, these findings are compatible with the hypothesis of an Irano-Turko-Slavic origin for AJs and a Slavic origin for Yiddish and contradict the predictions of Rhineland hypothesis that lacks historical, genetic, and linguistic support (Table 1).
One argument Eurocentric Christianity like to make is that Israelites look “Middle Eastern” or “olive”, but we know from the Bible that’s not True.
Tacitus is one more nail in the coffin.
“A few authorities hold that in the reign of Isis the surplus population of Egypt was evacuated to neighboring lands under the leadership of Hierosolymus and Judas. Many assure us that the Jews are descended from those Ethiopians who were driven by fear and hatred to emigrate from their home country when Cepheus was king. There are some who say that a motley collection of landless Assyrians occupied a part of Egypt, and then built cities of their own, inhabiting the lands of the Hebrews and the nearer parts of Syria…” - Tacitus, Histories 5.2-5
Tacitus described Hebrew origins as possibly Egyptian or Ethiopian. This is important because it puts perspective an Old Testament Bible verse:
“Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD. Have not I brought up Israel out of the land of Egypt? and the Philistines from Caphtor, and the Syrians from Kir?” - Amos 9:7
Tacitus words present a huge problem for those that teach a European / light / olive Egypt because we know for a fact that Ethiopians are not European. There’s no logical reason anyone would ever confuse a European with an Ethiopian. In addition to the Old Testament clarification, Tacitus also confirms an incident in the New Testament.
The importance of the Testimony of Tacitus is that he was a European (Roman) historian, and he is often quoted by Europeans as a credible source of history. Tacitus lived from (55 A.D. - 117 A.D.), which overlaps the lifetime of the apostle Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D.
“Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38
Paul, who was believed to have died in 64 A.D.
“Art not thou that Egyptian, which before these days madest an uproar, and leddest out into the wilderness four thousand men that were murderers?” - Acts 21:38 have been mistaken for an Egyptian, nor would the guard have assumed he didn’t speak Greek, and the people in the time of Tacitus wouldn’t have mistaken them for Egyptians and Ethiopians.
In his book ,The Great Roman-Jewish War: 66-70, the Roman historian, Flavius Josephus, stated over thousands of years ago, that the Israelites migrated into Africa. He writes:
“Millions of Jews fled into Africa, among other places, fleeing from Roman persecution and starvation during the siege.”
This is just one example of the migration.
*Once the Israelites migrated to West Africa, they established communities all through-out Africa.*
One of those communities was the Kingdom of Juda.
As mentioned in the Bible and in history, there was a Kingdom in Israel, called the Kingdom of Judah.
Jew comes from the name Judah.
That being said, one of the largest slave ports in West Africa, where many of our ancestors were stolen from was labeled the Kingdom of Juda.
Below is a 1747 map of Africa, created by an English cartographer named Edward Bowen(1693 or 1694-1767). This map, shows specifically where the ancestors of many African Americans come from.
HOW ISAAC TOOK REBEKA TO WIFE.
Flavius Josephus. The Works of Flavius Josephus. Translated by. William Whiston, A.M. Auburn and Buffalo. John E. Beardsley. 1895
238] ABRAHAM after this married Keturah, by whom six sons were born to him, men of courage, and of sagacious minds: Zambran, and Jazar, and Madan, and Madian, and Josabak, and Sous. Now the sons of Sous were Sabathan and Dadan. The sons of Dadan were Latusim, and Assur, and Luom. The sons of Madiau were Ephas, and Ophren, and Anoch, and Ebidas, and Eldas. Now, for all these sons and grandsons, Abraham contrived to settle them in colonies; and they took possession of Troglodytis, and the country of Arabia the Happy, as far as it reaches to the Red Sea. It is related of this Ophren, that he made war against Libya, and took it, and that his grandchildren, when they inhabited it, called it (from his name) Africa. And indeed Alexander Polyhistor gives his attestation to what I here say; who speaks thus: "Cleodemus the prophet, who was also called Malchus, who wrote a History of the Jews, in agreement with the History of Moses, their legislator, relates, that there were many sons born to Abraham by Keturah: nay, he names three of them, Apher, and Surim, and Japhran. That from Surim was the land of Assyria denominated; and that from the other two (Apher and Japbran) the country of Africa took its name, because these men were auxiliaries to Hercules, when he fought against Libya and Antaeus; and that Hercules married Aphra's daughter, and of her he begat a son, Diodorus; and that Sophon was his son, from whom that barbarous people called Sophacians were denominated."
Show the math that Koestler applied.
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
They’re definitely not Hebrew Israelites, the true chosen of THE MOST HIGH who covenanted with Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
💯💯💯 Agree. Many I know don't even believe in God. They do things like worship Buddhism and other nonsense that angers and offends God. They are not Jews in my opinion. What defines a Jew is precisely what you just wrote. Not "cultural". They are admixture atheists. Certainly not Jewish. If you reject God, you have no business calling yourself Jewish. This is warned of in Revelation 2:9 3:9. False Jews. What gave the original Israelites their definition and freedom was the belief & faith in the one true God, the God of Abraham. If you don't worship or believe any of this, you don't qualify. That's my opinion.
Jews are Middle Eastern NOT Subsaharan christians.
Oh, well a random guy in a CZcams comment section said it, so it must be true. Good to know you were there thousands of years ago to witness it.
Dude, talk about their skin tint. Look at their red headed rabis. White as snow, inbred as hell. Sheesh. It's obvious. Desert dwelling people are dark. No one talks about it.
@@anindividual9225It's true.
It makes me happy to know that future historians will know how much we valued plastic soda bottles and car tires
The text below is copied from page three of the 1980 Jewish Almanac. Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a "Jew" or to call a contemporary Jew an "Israelite" or a "Hebrew." They are European converts coming from their own mouths.
A book you haven't read, and that you can't explain why you believe is authoritative except that you think it says what you want it to say.
So your claiming white people are Jews? I’m confused here
@@BrawlyDaStar they don't know what they're claiming. Most of the commenters are members of one of the Black Hebrew Israelite cults. They're not Jews.
We haven't been Israelites for thousands of years.We became Jews after returning from the Babylonian Diaspora.
@@MistahMatzahStop 🛑✋🏾 the cap.
Seems like you're soft shilling for them
Sold out for 12k subs lmbo 😂
@@YishaiYosef85😂😂😂
I know one thing,,, "The Lie Nor The Liar Will Enter The Kingdom Of God".
Shes godless mate...
Man you got so many conspiracy theories in your comments. It's so sad to me as an Ashkenazi how so many people insist despite all evidence and history of my family I don't exist or am a conspiracy.
Your mention of the cousin and the vocal chords in the first sentence showed that you had nothing substantial to say on this very important topic. Arthur Koestler has settled this question using documentary evidence going back 1000 years. Khazars were converted in the 7th century and had nothing to do with the Middle East. Are you up to date with the archeological findings conducted by Russian experts in recent years?
I would like to hear your take on the financiers behind the trans-atlantic slave trade. Will you try to obfuscate that historical truth as well?
Listening to her, my first thought was… “controlled opposition”. The same ones that would say “Massa’ is a good man, huh?” She don’t wanna see the evidence in her face and put together fast talking and word salad to sound like she seems to know what she’s talking about.
She plagiarised Unpacked's video word for word
“If in the nineteenth century scholars were doubtful about the conversion of the Khazar kingdom, today it is not in dispute.” -Shlomo Sand, Professor Emeritus of History, University of Tel Aviv.
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
Yeah but he’s incorrect lmao
@@rawrostar he's one of the most qualified historians in the world in this topic, your comment means nothing.
@@inigomontoya8943 he’s still incorrect. Wrong is wrong no matter who it comes from
Like Shlomo Sand isn’t really taken seriously anymore after his nonsense claiming that Ashkenazi Jews are Khazar converts. I read that he thought that by pushing this theory, it could strengthen Ashkenazi claim as Europeans and stop them being discriminated against or whatever. Whatever plan he had backfired becuase he didn’t realise he was appealing to antisemites and they used his “theory” to spread misinformation about the heritage of Ashkenazi Jews.
It really annoys them that people that “look white” can come from a place like Israel. For the same reason that Asian Jews really annoy people. Because it’s difficult to put people like that in a box and forces them to rethink their racist narrative.
national geographic describes the methods used in the study and the results. Search:
dna-from-biblical-canaanites-lives-modern-arabs-jews@@inigomontoya8943
I have no dog in the fight, but find the topic interesting due to recent events. P.S. have seen these graphics in several other videos…. Did you make them? Just curious.
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
In the end all of the DNA doesn’t matter because Jewish law doesn’t acknowledge it. We KNOW that the Ashkenazim aren’t the people who left Palestine in the 1st century. We know they converted and even when reading correspondence between Jews from centuries ago it is kinda evident and that is why there was such friction between them and the Sephardim. There was no “ middle eastern dna” in the 1st century. There is what they are calling “ middle eastern dna” there NOW , and those people originally came from the North like the Ashkenazim did in about the 7 th century. Which Id estimate is why there is any connection. But either way noting establishes one’s Jewishness but JEWISH LAW, Halakha . And no ethnicity is more “ Jewish” in status than the other. And I wish all Jews would understand and accept that .
I don't have to accept your speculations
"Let me wslk you through it". "I'm not going to bore you with the truth ". Brought to you by the fact checkers at Reuters.
If the Khazar story has been bebunked as you say and there is no credibility to it, then why did someone go to such lengths to completely remove the Khazarian Empire from our history books. It was a very large empire, so why would that be hidden? I never learned about it in school and I don't know of anyone that has. I ask again, if the Khazar story is a nothing berger, why such suspicious behavior. Actions speak louder than words.
Exactly
But those same history books didn't talk about the large and significant Avar Empire either, among other major kingdoms and empires. Secondary school textbooks are dumbed down and simplified compared to university books.
Khazars are filthy Turks anyway. Non blanco savages. Know what I mean?
Because history is written by the powerful therefore incorrect.
Because it's insignificant in world history, maybe if you took a course specializing in that geographic area they'd get a footnote
Speaking of genetics, DNA studies have revealed that Yiddish, the Ashkenazi language, originated in north east Turkey (souther Khazaria). Strikingly, this very same area has four villages named Iskenaz, Eskenaz, Ashanaz, Ashkuz!!!
That's a lie
@@RandomGuy-sn3ne
"The Genetic Structure of Ashkenazic Jews. AJs were localized to modern-day Turkey and found to be *genetically closest to Turkic, southern Caucasian, and Iranian populations* , suggesting a common origin in Iranian “Ashkenaz” lands (Das et al., 2016)"
....
"Thus far, all analyses aimed to geo-localize AJs (Behar et al., 2013, Figure 2B; Elhaik, 2013, Figure 4; Das et al., 2016, Figure 4) identified Turkey as the predominant origin of AJs..."
...
"Xue et al. (2017) also inferred an “admixture time” of 960-1,416 AD (≈24-40 generations ago), which corresponds to the time *AJs experienced major geographical shifts as the Judaized Khazar kingdom diminished and their trading networks collapsed forcing them to relocate to Europe* (Das et al., 2016). The lower boundary of that date corresponds to the time Slavic Yiddish originated, to the best of our knowledge."
_The Origins of Ashkenaz, Ashkenazic Jews, and Yiddish_
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Genet., 21 June 2017
Sec. Evolutionary and Population Genetics
Volume 8 - 2017 | doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00087
1▪︎ Manipal Centre for Natural Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, India
2▪︎ Department of Linguistics, Tel Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
3▪︎ Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
4▪︎ Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Published in Journal of Genome Biology and Evolution, Oxford University.
____________
Enter denial.
Yiddish is a Diaspora language. Yiddish is middle high German with loan words from Hebrew Aramaic and Slavic, Slavic entered into Yiddish when jews moved West to East to Slavic lands and there are different dialects of Yiddish.
BS
@@musicfunlax1224 cope
So who is the Bible making reference to as though claiming to be Jews but are not?
That's not in the Jewish Bible.
Jew comes from yule, pronounced yude
meaning day
or one under the sun
The Temple of Smyrna
Bless n thanks 🙏 my sister for the information I didn’t know that Jamaica 🇯🇲 Jamaica 🇯🇲
This women is a gate keeper
Or she is just not fully j pilled yet.
👀👀
She’s bought and paid for.
I agree 💯!!!!! ,If what she says is true, please explain why it's ILLEGAL for "Jews" living in Israel to get DNA tests 🤔🤔🤔🤔????!!!
What a disgrace
Inference of Geographical Origins
Deciphering the origin of human populations is not a new challenge for geneticists, yet only in the past decade high-throughput genetic data were harnessed to answer these questions. Here, we briefly discuss the differences between the available tools based on identity by distance. Existing PCA or PCA-like approaches (e.g., Novembre et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2012) can localize Europeans to countries (understood as the last place where major admixture event took place or the place where the four ancestors of “unmixed” individuals came from) with less than 50% accuracy (Yang et al., 2012). The limitations of PCA (discussed in Novembre and Stephens, 2008) appear to be inherent in the framework where continental populations plotted along the two primary PCs cluster in the vertices of a triangle-like shape and the remaining populations cluster along or within the edges (e.g., Elhaik et al., 2013). There is therefore reason to question the applicability of ambitious PCA-based methods (Yang et al., 2012, 2014) aiming to infer multiple ancestral locations outside of Europe. Overall, accurate localization of worldwide individuals remains a significant challenge (Elhaik et al., 2014).
The GPS framework assumes that humans are mixed and that their genetic variation (admixture) can be modeled by the proportion of genotypes assigned to any number of fixed regional putative ancestral populations (Elhaik et al., 2014). GPS employs a supervised ADMIXTURE analysis where the admixture components are fixed, which allows evaluating both the test individuals and reference populations against the same putative ancestral populations. GPS infers the geographical coordinates of an individual by matching their admixture proportions with those of reference populations. Reference populations are populations known to reside in a certain geographical region for a substantial period of time in a time frame of hundreds to a thousand years and can be predicted to their geographical locations while absent from the reference population panel (Das et al., 2016). The final geographic location of a test individual is determined by converting the genetic distance of the individual to m reference populations into geographic distances (Elhaik et al., 2014). Intuitively, the reference populations can be thought of as “pulling” the individual in their direction with a strength proportional to their genetic similarity until a consensus is reached (Figure S1). Interpreting the results, particularly when the predicted location differs from the contemporary location of the studied population, demands cautious.
Population structure is affected by biological and demographic processes like genetic drift, which can act rapidly on small, relatively isolated populations, as opposed to large non-isolated populations, and migration, which occurs more frequently (Jobling et al., 2013). Understanding the geography-admixture relationships necessitates knowing how relative isolation and migration history affected the allele frequencies of populations. Unfortunately, oftentimes we lack information about both processes. GPS addresses this problem by analyzing the relative proportions of admixture in a global network of reference populations that provide us with different “snapshots” of historical admixture events. These global admixture events occurred at different times through different biological and demographic processes, and their long-lasting effect is related to our ability to associate an individual with their matching admixture event.
In relatively isolated populations the admixture event is likely old, and GPS would localize a test individual with their parental population more accurately. By contrast, if the admixture event was recent and the population did not maintain relative isolation, GPS prediction would be erroneous (Figure S2). This is the case of Caribbean populations, whose admixture proportions still reflect the massive Nineteenth and Twentieth centuries' mixture events involving Native Americans, West Europeans, and Africans (Elhaik et al., 2014). While the original level of isolation remains unknown, these two scenarios can be distinguished by comparing the admixture proportions of the test individual and adjacent populations. If this similarity is high, we can conclude that we have inferred the likely location of the admixture event that shaped the admixture proportion of the test individual. If the opposite is true, the individual is either mixed and thereby violates the assumptions of the GPS model or the parental populations do not exist either in GPS's reference panel or in reality. Most of the time (83%) GPS predicted unmixed individuals to their true locations with most of the remaining individuals predicted to neighboring countries (Elhaik et al., 2014).
To understand how migration modifies the admixture proportions of the migratory and host populations, we can consider two simple cases of point or massive migration followed by assimilation and a third case of migration followed by isolation. Point migration events have little effect on the admixture proportions of the host population, particularly when it absorbs a paucity of migrants, in which case the migrants' admixture proportions would resemble those of the host population within a few generations and their resting place would represent that of the host population. Massive demographic movements, such as large-scale invasion or migration that affect a large part of the population are rare and create temporal shifts in the admixture proportions of the host population. The host population would temporarily appear as a two-way mixed population, reflecting the components of the host and invading populations (e.g., European and Native American, in the case of Puerto Ricans) until the admixture proportions would homogenize population-wise. If this process is completed, the admixture signature of this region may be altered and the geographical placement of the host population would represent again the last place where the admixture event took place for both the host and invading populations. GPS would, thereby, predict the host population's location for both populations. Populations that migrate from A to B and maintain genetic isolation would be predicted to point A in the leave-one-out population analysis. While human migrations are not uncommon, maintaining a perfect genetic isolation over a long period of time is very difficult (e.g., Veeramah et al., 2011; Behar et al., 2012; Elhaik, 2016; Hellenthal et al., 2016), and GPS predictions for the vast majority of worldwide populations indicate that these cases are indeed exceptional (Elhaik et al., 2014). Despite of its advantages, GPS has several limitations. First, it yields the most accurate predictions for unmixed individuals. Second, using migratory or highly mixed populations (both are detectable through the leave-one-out population analysis) as reference populations may bias the predictions. Further developments are necessary to overcome these limitations and make GPS applicable to mixed population groups (e.g., African Americans).
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
Onkelos Kalonymus never existed and even if he had, by the Ashkenazis Jews own account, he was a *_Roman Convert._*
Remember, Jewish is a religion, not a " Peoples "
Exactly, to be a Jew is to embrace the Hebrew culture, to be a Hebrew is another thing altogether, it's a bloodline.
One can be Jewish and not be Hebrew. Only bloodline Hebrews are Hebrews.
This is so True.I know that as a Turkish woman.
Honestly Ashkenazi Jews look similar to Armenians and Georgians and other folks who come from the Caucasus. Some of their surnames are quite curious, Like "Kagan" and "Kaplan". These are Turkic surnames so why are they so common among Ashkenazi people? Also noteworthy is that they have very little middle eastern DNA. For a people whose ancestry is the levant then you'd expect much more significant middle eastern markers and should more closely resemble nearby populations yet we don't see that among them. In fact some of them don't even have middle eastern DNA. You can even look this up yourself.
first of all kagan is derived from cohen, nothing to do with turkic khagan or khaganate...the similarity with georgians and armenians is their shared middle eastern J haplogroup, not turkic, because as you know real turkic was eastern asian in appearance like tuvan, kazakh or kyrgyz, but invaded west asia and brought their language...youre mixing things up
@@paulofassman5657no one said Armenians or Georgians have Turkic DNA but in reverse like modern day Anatolia is turkified Greeks, Armenians and other Anatolian and caucuasian groups that embraced the turkic culture. Ottoman empire was ruled by central Asian turkic groups but the ordinary and majority was of non Turkic origin. Same concept with the Kazars, you don't need to have Turkic DNA or linguistic to completely rule out the theory. And yes lot of the Ashkenazi jews do look similar to Armenians and Georgians, other caucuasian groups and look less semetic
Ashkenazi Jews do have a lot of Middle Eastern markers such as those in the Cohen haplogroup J1-Y5400. As Paulo Fassman already said, Kagan is a Russian variant of the name Cohen. Every Ashkenazic person has between 35 and 65 percent of Middle Eastern DNA. The ones who preserve the highest proportion are German Jews.
@user-jr4kc6lu9q that is incorrect, ashkanazi jews have 60 to 80 European dna the rest are most likely from the Armenian highlands(eastern Anatolia) Caucasus which is where haplogroup J is believed to come from. The term middle eastern doesn't mean anything, and it's a relatively a new way of describing a certain area. The question is how much of semite blood do they have.
Onlar turk museviler 😂
Lady you just said one of the facts they speak Yiddish !! Not hebrew, they aren’t Semitic
Yiddish is a mix of Hebrew and German........................................
@@ryanpaul1403 Yiddish is a GERMAN dialect with Hebrew words in it, that doesn’t mean much buddy! Eastern European Jews aren’t Hebrew
@@ryanpaul1403 try getting smarter or not lying
they are roughly 20-30% Israelite, the rest is Italian, Greek and German@@shjo2778
Thanks for the info
Great video! Super interesting just subscribed, thanks for the videos!
That's not what the Bible says bible says otherwise. The bible describes the jews Dark skin
Right
and Aryans were descrines as fair light skin
Blonde or red hair
Blue, green or grey eyes
and some very large people
that pioneered Agriculture and horse culture
But THAT was all hidden
We changed the word Aryan to Proto Indo European
The bible is NOT a history book
Bronze isn't that dark
Have you seen bronze burning? It's white haha Israelites have always been caucasians.
Chapter and verse, please. David is described as "ruddy and handsome".
@@LeeZaslofsky Yes David is Pharaoh Psusennes ll. He was of the ginger haired royal lineage in Egypt.
I don't think it's correct to say it "can't" be proven whether or how many Khazars converted to Judaism. Archaelogy continues to uncover the past. This is a distinct question apart from whether such converts became the Ashkenazi. I took a deep dive into archaeology during covid. I was amazed how many of my boyhood questions about the ancient world have been answered during the course of my lifetime. That will continue.
Can't be proven....only because these evil people were theives and stole and hid all the proof of their evil deeds. They will be uncovered and found and released to all the World very soon!!!
yep and she forgets that many jews had to convert often into other religions and cultures and are therefore not registered as "ashkenazi jew" and their data is missing. and then she goes on about israels claim to its land out of nowhere lol another activist.
but she did her research and some dialectics.
she also forgets that the ashkenazi dont have to be ethnically connected with the land of israel. mizrahi and sephardi are anyway and they claim their land with their ashkenazi brothers
she should learn more history. they always mingled and mixed with opposing families and changed their ethnicity. with babylon, with the antiochos greek and maccabeus, with romans under herodes with french german british etc
they mixed countless times and still claimed israel bc they could and their believe is strong bonding them together for the cause
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
@@thomashauer6804 you are forgetting the fact that genetics fade after 500 years living on other soil than the homeland. Those Jews don’t excist anymore
@@lalat9452 not true . We still have our 200 000 year old Stoneage genetics in us homp sapiens Neandertaler etc...why is everybody inventing fake news against the jews suddenly lol
This woman has absolutely no ideal what she is talking about!!!
She’s a mouthpiece for the System!!!
For the mere fact that she said in the beginning of her speech:
‘I have no intention of taking you through the complete history of the jewish people and that the goal here is not to get too bogged down with the details’!!!
This is her main problem and the major mistake she makes of not wanting to go through the “DETAILED” history is the specific reason that she kept saying “There’s no proof” that the present day j’s are of Khazarian Origin!!!
This individual in this specific video has absolutely no ideal what she is talking about!!!
I thought the exact same thing
There is no proof
Watch Unpacked video on the same topic. Very interesting
Let's not be bogged down with detail. You mean facts and truths?
I just watched a different video on this subject, and I swear you’re reading the same script that he did. I should watch them side-by-side to see how many words are actually different
I wonder if their cheques got the same signature too
I was born in USSR in Central Asia. There are local Jews we called them Buckara Jews. Their language is completely different and close to local language which is Uzbek. Also there are local Jews in Coucase mountains.
I think we all agree on counting the years from year zero, which should be enough to understand who was where
Some of what is in this presentation is correct, about 70-75%; however, there is a plethora of research that will disprove some of your argument.
What’s the research? 😂
@@rawrostar the actual 4 Jewish Tel Aviv professors in this videos who are saying that they are in fact Khazar.
@@generallee5330 they’re wrong
They don't think critically about sources this way. @@rawrostar
Problem to this claim that European Jews are from the khazars is, there were Ashkenazi Jews in Germany before and during the khazars.
And no Ashkenazi Jews have dna from turkey, they have very similar dna to sefardim, so obviously their was a connection of Ashkenazi Jews to sefardim before the khazars.
This lady gets Hebrews and Jews all mixed up.
Black people seem to wish to steal the Identity "hebrew" thats nice, but not accurate
Jesus Christ is the way, the truth and the life!
Only sent unto the lost sheep of the 12 tribes of Israel.
Anytime you hear “debunk” and “theory” in professional videos you know there’s truth to it
good work
It's funny...because, the Biblical description of the Hebrew Israelites says they were Black🤔
@supadupa790
Where in the Bible
According to the Bible: Jews and Arabs are descended from Noah's son Shem = Semites
According to the Bible: Blacks (i.e. Africans) are descended from Noah's son Ham
According to the Bible: Whites and Orientals (Chinese/Mongolians) are descended from Noah's son Japheth
DNA evidence proves that Jews and Arabs are descended from a common ancestor: The Abraham of the Bible
These groups have had different female lines in their ancestry but the male DNA is the same for both groups.
There are Black people who have converted to Judaism (Sammy Davis Jr. comes to mind) In Ethiopia there
were Blacks who converted to Judaism and were descended from people in the line of the Queen of Sheba
and King Solomon (I think that they have relocated to Israel).
Those so-called Black Israelites are an American cult.
Exactly, these are the people the Bible spoke of that they say they’re but are not an that they’re fake.
Some people say the Jews are the Hebrew Israelites. Some people say that Native Americans are the true Hebrew Israelites. Some black people claim that black people are the true Hebrew Israelites. A claim was once made that the original settlers of Britain were the true Hebrew Israelites. Whoever they are, JESUS IS KING, and the "tribe" that someone may or may not belong to is not going to save them.
Which verse of the bible state that ?
job30:30, Jeremiah 8:21, 14:2, lamentations 4:8, 5:10 but you heathens don’t read the Bible with your racist azzes
You know most times a king converts to a religion they make no attempt to convert any of there populace
Yiddish is obviously not etymological based in hebrew
It's German which just adopt words
"Yiddish is obviously not etymological based in hebrew"
Lol what? 20% of Yiddish is Hebrew.
English is a Germanic language
We also changed the word Aryan to Proto-Indo-European
Hebrew was a Fire Priest
its the priest class, that creates languages
with "it"
facts-Yiddish is Hebrew and many northern-western Europe not only Germany, the Irish-Scotish Catholic killed many Jews as for others did also, they made their own words just as Penn. USA, why they did I don't now really why or what faith they had.
The Danube valley is in Austria? Are all your other data of the same validity? Look it up.
We also have a Don river in Toronto
and a Don Valley too
Coming from Jewish heritage, mixed Eastern European, Russian, German, and Israeli, I would say 1st, Judaism is obviously a religion.... however religious individuals are or not, what binds the various parts of us together is culture and values. Across the genetics and parts of the world, from the middle east through Europe to New York and Los Angeles, there's a thread of commonalities that finds its way into generations, realizing it or not. The older i get, the more I find of myself and learn about the heritage, I discover myself in it. It's kinda crazy actually.
In 1943, Abraham N. Polak (sometimes referred to as Poliak), later professor of the history of the Middle Ages at Tel Aviv University, published a Hebrew monograph in which he concluded that the East European Jews came from Khazaria.
"The corpus of personal names and surnames borne by Jews in Eastern Europe during the last six centuries, as well as the Yiddish language as a whole, do not contain any link to Khazaria."
[G]enerations of Jews, like generations of any people, leave historical traces behind them. These traces come in multiple forms. For starters, people leave behind them historical documents and archaeological data. Predictably, archaeologic evidence about the widespread existence of Jews in Khazaria is almost nonexistent. While a series of independent sources does testify to the existence in the 10th century of Jews in the Kingdom of Khazaria, and while some of these sources also indicate that the ruling elite of Khazaria embraced Judaism, the Khazarian state was destroyed by Russians during the 960s. In other words, we can be confident that Judaism was not particularly widespread in that kingdom." -- Alexander Beider, linguist and the author of reference books about Jewish names and the history of Yiddish.
Well I'd like to see his evidence.
@@Qrayon
But is there conclusive evidence to the contrary? Can we link Ashkenazi Jews to Abraham by blood line? Do we have Juda's DNA to link Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews to hum?
Remember, *abscense of evidence is not evidence of abscense!* Just because we have poor evidence linking Ashkenazi jews to Khazaria does not mean that there are no linkages whatsoever.
ok if we Ashkenazi are Khazars
you forget this
if you convert to Judaism
than you are an official Jewish
@@Moses_Ben_Aaron I don't believe there is sufficient evidence to suggest that modern Ashkenazi jews are Khazars.
However, there are two questions that remain unaddressed:
1. What is the origin of the term *"Ashkenazi"?* Why are natural Jews (descendants of Israel or Jacob) not just know as *"Jews"?* In the context of Genesis 10:3; why would descendants of Yakov/Yakob (who are descendants of Shem) identify themselves with the descendants of Yaphet/Japhet? Or in the context of Genesis 10:6; why would descendants of Yakov/Yakob (who are descendants of Shem) identify themselves with the descendants of Mizraim (descendants of Ham)? It tends to confirm *"conversion to Judaism"* rather than being blood descendants of Yakov/Yakob.
2. Historian Josephus tends to suggest that during Roman war, conquest and occupation of Judea and Jerusalem from 70AD, the majority of Jews run into Africa instead. However, some Jews were also taken captive to Rome (lets say 50k).
This would suggest that original Jews in Jerusalem were melanated people or like some black tribes of Africa (like the bantu, *"lemba tribe"* in Zimbabwe and South Africa). So even those taken captive to Rome would have been dark skinned and through intermarriages with European tribes, they would have eventually become white over time and hence Ashkenazi Jews. Sephardic and Mizrahi jews would have also changed in their complexion (over the last 2000 years) through intermarriages as well to look the way they look today!
In conclusion, *"unbiased DNA studies"* should continue to shed light on ancient populations of the world. What would be interesting for example would be for Ashkenazi and Sephardic jews to explore their *genetic connection"* to their brothers on the African continent and diaspora (USA, the Caribbean, Jamaica, etc...).
I personally believe that Ashkenazi, Sephardic, Mizrahi jews are all genuine descendants of Abraham through their religious practices. But they have mixed with other gentile nations and this is also true those Isrealites on the African continent and diaspora: not all Africans are Isrealites and even those that are, have also mixed with other African tribes. I think DNA research will eventually uncover the truth and that is what we should be aiming for rather than strong opinions either way.
Tensions are High right now 🙏🏽 …. War on the Horizon … souls held captive … from those taken hostage … to those who have been ‘held hostage’ all their lives in Palestine . Human Civilians are helpless victims of those who wage wars
Tension & Concerns are High 🙏🏽
You mean in Israel.
People found out they are Khazars or at least Italians I guess 🤷♂️
Bravo my sista you are very well informed.
Not really.
regard from croatia, do you know your origins? tell me
Croatia was under Aryan rule a long time ago
also are you familiar with the House of Hapsburg-Lorraine?
Genesis 10:1-5
Ashkenaz are Gentiles
false
Ashkenazi are descendant and grandson of Japheth 95% of the jewish people have khazar dna dna test do not lie!
They also carry Sub-Saharan blood from East Africa.
This is just false
they are not descendants of anyone, other than their own family
Just like you
only they are in a cult
that you are also in
that nobody understands
You know japheth is not a real person right? And that ashkenaz is just a name of a place?
@@adivshtein2054 You are typing in CZcams so you must have a computer, yet, you refuse to type in, Askenazi Jew? why? and now youre trying to argue and put me down? Does that make you feel better?
The Khazar hypothesis of Ashkenazi ancestry is a largely abandoned historical hypothesis that postulated that Ashkenazi Jews were primarily, or to a large extent, descended from Khazars, a multi-ethnic conglomerate of mostly Turkic peoples who formed a semi-nomadic khanate in and around the northern and central Caucasus and the Pontic-Caspian steppe. The hypothesis also postulated that after collapse of the Khazar empire, the Khazars fled to Eastern Europe and made up a large part of the Jews there. However, this hypothesis has been largely discredited by genetic studies on Jews, which have found no substantive evidence of a Khazar origin among Ashkenazi Jews. Therefore, it is unlikely that Ashkenazi Jews are descended from Khazars.
Sounded thorough or biased. I have not made up my mind. I could be suffering from a confirmation bias myself.Thanks for the video.
I am Karachay (post-khazar) Turkic who live in modern day Turkey, i can literally say Ashkenazi Jews are not Turkic. They have never related to old Turkic traditions and languages. But if you want to find modern day Khazars, you may look at the Crimean Karais or Karaites. They are judaists but not Jewish. They are speaking Turkic language and following some common Turkic traditions too.
The Jews Harp is a traditional Turkish instrument from Siberia
Thank you, brother.
They’re “Jewish” but are not Jews.
Real truth
The ruling elite may have been Turkic, or North Caucasians/Alans who underwent language replacement, and the bulk of the population were likely Alans etc. This would make sense since Ashkhenaz is literally the Biblical name for Scythia, Ashkhenazi the name for Scythians. Alans are the remnants in the Middle Ages of the Scythians from ancient times.
However modern DNA analyses seems to show they are predominantly Italian in origin, descended from Roman coverts to Judaism in ancient times, (conversion to Judaism was common the ancient Rome) who later spread out across Europe and mixed with the various peoples in different parts of Europe.
Perhaps they are mixture of both of the above.
Can you do a video on the Jews that migrated to Africa?
what is a jew?
Beta Israel..... Oddly, similar genetics as askenazi cus they both came from the middle east
@@ughhstuff the word Nazi is right there inside askenazi? and nobody noticed???????
@@je-freenorman7787 That is irrelevant. It is not Hebrew
Nomads don’t usually build and leave archaeological evidence, nor have written historical records, so we won’t any of that type of evidence to prove or disprove anything. I heard that one Russian czar when faced with a lawless clan, demanded they get (a major world) religion: Judaism, christianity, or Islam) and that they chose Judaism but seemingly didn ‘t change their lawless ways. Is there any historical record of that?
thank goodness you could not be more wrong
Nomads definitely did leave evidence
and
Judaism , Christianity and Islam are not 3 seprate cults
Its ONE
they are the same
Its a monotheistic, Abrahamic cult
NOT separate
its all jewish
DNA disagrees with you.
From the earliest days of the American republic, Jews were technically considered white, at least in a legal sense. Under the Naturalization Act of 1790, they were considered among the “free white persons” who could become citizens. Later laws limited the number of immigrants from certain countries, restrictions which were in part targeted at Jews. But unlike Asian and African immigrants in the late 19th century, Jews retained a claim to being “Caucasian,” meaning they could win full citizenship status based on their putative race.
Yeah but that is wierd because Mishrahi Jews and Etiophian Jews are clearly not white.
@@gorgioarmanioso151Jews come in all colours!! Ashkenazi Jews certainly are white or white passing, but there are plenty of Ashkenazi Jews who look very Middle Eastern and around the world Jews have tended to appear physically similar to their host countries over long periods of settling there, for example in Yemen, Morocco or India thuletide.wordpress.com/2021/01/03/are-ashkenazi-jews-white-european/
Hardly any Jews lived in America until mass immigration began in the 1880's after large scale pogroms and repressive measures in the Russian Empire. Europeans didn't consider Jews as European or eligible for citizenship rights. If you are familiar with the tradition of the Haggadah it's obvious that historically Jews never considered themselves as European, whether or not they were "believers" . The French revolution Emancipated Jews in France in 1791 and Napoleon extended rights in the conquered countries but they were revoked after his defeat. Emancipation happened in 1858 in England, 1867 Austria and Hungary, 1870 Sweden and Norway, 1871 in Germany, 1910 Spain and in the Russian empire where most lived, not until the revolution of 1917. Germany again revoked all rights in 1935, and made the extermination of the Jews in Europe a priority in the war often to the detriment of tactical considerations. Evidently they never got the American memo that Jews were YT.
Fact 1# Everyone on earth comes from non- disease mutated gene humic parents i.e. so-called ruddy blacks. Fact 2# Only Black men and women have the oldest human genes on earth and were Adam and eve. Fact 3# White European skin is produced by a disease mutated non-human gene. Fact 4# Adam and eve would have to be infected with a disease, in order to produce a mutant white skin child with blue eyes. Fact 5# In order for a Human being to be born, a modern-day Ashkenazi the human will have to be infected, with a non-human diseased gene, a mutation, white European skin. Fact 6# the Holy Bible indicates in 2Kings 5:27 that white European skin is an auto immune disease produced from a Biblical white skin curse, because of sin. Fact 7# To say that the 12 tribe of Israel, the savior's body is an auto immune disease sin, curse, of white Europeans that are known to carry a wet dog smell is Blasphemy..
Caucasian means the people of the Caucasus Mountains in Georgia which was the Ashkenazi so calling Western Europeans Caucasian is wrong, there were Celts of different Bloods. So I would say there is a difference between Caucasian and gemanic Celts
@ stg213 good comment and the Persians( Cyprus the Great)conquered Babylonia and many Jews returned to Israel ( some stayed) and built the second temple which was then destroyed by the Romans as you mentioned 😊
70 A.D. Christ Forewarned.
Clif_High speaks of this as well, but goes a bit deeper in the origins and focuses on the Khazarian mafia aspect. Excellent source of info! 👍
All fascinating and mind boggling stuff
This video contains so many inaccuracies: Sephardim came to Spain with their cousins the Arabs and both either forced to convert or leave.
The khazars actually origins in N Mongolia, who were kicked out due to their behaviour towards other Mongolians.
In ukraine, it is openly taught that khazars converted in the 8th century.
I know they are lying because “lord” rotschild payed a lot of money to erase his old Babylonian empires history
The Thirteenth Tribe is a 1976 book by Arthur Koestler, in which the author advances the thesis that Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars, a Turkic people
ok if we Ashkenazi are Khazars
you forget this
if you convert to Judaism
than you are an official Jewish
@@Moses_Ben_AaronLol You can't convert to being " Chosen"
This woman is nothing but a propagandist. She boldly lies that there's no evidence of conversion to Judaism.
@@Moses_Ben_Aaroncan they claim for the land in middle east?
@@AliAhmed-py1qsNope this is why they hate this truth
Just discovered your channel . I love this video great work. Keep doing what your doing please
Very interesting. So wouldn’t it make sense that modernnn ashkenazi’s origins are in both semitic and european roots? Or is that aready a blatant leftover point that went over my head lol
the flag of Israel is copy of the Karamanids Turks
It’s actually the star of rempham. There is no mention of a “star of David” on the Bible, but there is a mention of the star of rempham
@@RabbiSchmuelGoldsteinTreeofLifthe Star of David is in the portion of Ha’azinu . It represents zeir anpin and malchut , above and below that’s the short version
@@Tamar-sz8ox yes, and that’s why it is called the star of rempham. It comes from ancient Babylonian mysticism. It does not originate from the Israelites.
@@RabbiSchmuelGoldsteinTreeofLifit’s is “ mysticism “ or is it just part of the design of the cosmos ?
@@Tamar-sz8ox it’s both
She doesn't even realize that she has a better chance of being an Israelite than the people in Israel today snh
That is because she has done no independent research. Therefore she does not know where to look.
Like a nonsensical Black Hebrew? That's such a low IQ hopium for blacks who can't just be happy to be American.
We wuz jewz!
@@bigginsg8711nah u is fakes, white people don't come from Africa
I agee she will not get her PhD if the the conclusion does not suit her jewish professor.
Good content glad to see it out here!👏
False propananda
The Khazars were Turkic Eurasian Steppe Nomadic Horse Archers who settled and lived in Eastern Europe to tge North of the Caucasus who converted to Judaism but were wiped out by the Cumans, Kipchaks and eventually the Mongols.
I'm a Hungarian and we were under the Khazars for a while and some Hungarians comverted to Judaism until we packed up and moved to rhe Xarpathian Basin at the end of the 9th Century.
The Irish called themselves "Crazy Turks"
Mongols were considered Tartarians
Hungarians were the Hun
Bulgarians were the Bulgars
THEY WERE ALL ARYANS
@@je-freenorman7787Aryans are haplogroup r1a
@@JagdDachshund Is that what they call them now?
In revelations it talks about the synagogue of satan and those Jews who say they are Jews but are not!
The ashkenazi name is interesting because if you look at the sons of Japheth in the book of Genesis it states that Ashkenaz was one of the sons of Japheth!
Yes, thank you. False jews. Using religion for special favors. A desert dwelling people are dark. Is this too hard to understand? Polish people are white, Hebrews were brown. We are so stupid that we believe a lie.
This.
Ashkenazi refers to the name of the place that Jews were exiled to. Not the biblical figure.
That was referring to the Temple of Smirna, not jews. Read that passage again.
You can't use quotes from Christianity to prove or disprove anything about other faiths.