Russia’s New Il-96-400M Stretch Takes Its 1st Flight
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 08. 2024
- According to a report on the Russian government's official website on November 1st, the prototype of the long-range widebody passenger aircraft IL-96-400M has successfully completed its maiden flight. The plane is manufactured by Voronezh Aircraft Manufacturing Company, a subsidiary of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) of Russia. Let’s look at the details of this milestone for today’s video!
Article: simpleflying.c...
Our Social Media:
/ simpleflyin. .
/ simple_flying
/ simpleflying. .
Our Website
simpleflying.com/
For copyright matters please contact us at: legal@valnetinc.com
Is this more fuel efficient than the A340? Or maybe, the right question: Does fuel efficiency even matter in Russia?
erm...Engines Made in Russia...what do you think?! 😂😂
@@swanvictor887Much worse
Their jet engines were designed for reliability and simplicity (thus cheaper) but with shorter lifespan compared to western engines. Worse fuel efficiency too.
@@filledwithvariousknowledge2747 they made new engines they are pretty good on paper and judging by that they are going to be used its safe tos ay they are more efficient then the older engines they used
I don’t think it matters. The only customers will be Russian airlines and Cubana, they just want Russian built jets and I don’t think they care about that.
Russia has to start making more domestically made aircraft since it can't depend on Western aircraft/parts anymore due to sanctions.
Riveting analysis
@@d.b.cooper1
You'll be surprised how many miss that.
Problem is modern jets are really really complicated, the material science is in another dimension. Russia can’t complete all by themselves.
@@edc1569Which is why you can just hire good engineers or engineers from different countries/ ex engineers from companies to do that for you, it's not like they can't do that
Exactly
Didn’t know their are so many aircraft experts in the chat 😂
Probably they were part of the project, that's why they knew it.😆
They have designed countless jet planes and flown them. Didn't you know?😂😂😂
@@Zerpentsa6598 like the supersonic one crashing during the airshow?
I mean, it is your country only. You guys tend to think you know better than everyone.
@@Star737_yt like concorde?
Russia makes its own cars, ships, planes, tanks, missiles everything you can think of they make it.
The country is amazing.
Watching from Somalia.
Then Why Do Russians Have To Steal Toilets And Washing Machines From Ukraine??? Ha, Ha
Lol. They can't compete globally like the Japanese, Chinese and Americans
Egypt and Turkey are also watching trust me my somalian brother, the corruption and fraud are real
Yes, cars, computer, cellphone everything.
@@jeanpierrelaolou5490 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Love the quad! Have gotten bored with nothing but twins and miss the originals. Retro? Yes, but to me, beautiful.
4 engines, it's safer dude
You bet! I did Love it too!😊
Bigger planes have 4 engines
Staying with four engines probably means some trust and thrust issues 😂
Why do others have 2 engines? Why don't they just keep one single engine after all if there is so much trust and thrust?
@@julienckjm7430 More engines - more safety - more flexibility - higher production costs - higher operating costs - higher noise - higher environmental pollution.
just like boing late suspecious crashes ???
Another gas guzzler
If the IL 96 was any good Aeroflot would still be useing them the only commercial airline still useing it is CUBANA and the only reason they are is because they can't get anything to replace it
@@julienckjm7430 Redundancy. Same reason why humans have two of almost anything
45m cabin length......while A340-200 has 46m
😂 And that's the short one with CFM engines!
Wrong. It's 63.93m, very close to the A340-300's 63.69m
Cabin length and fuselage length are two different things@@DiminishingAugmentation
Yes. But the Russian plane has two genders only.
Spooky
Beautiful plane. Quad jets always look better and safer. I love the short sharp nose.
You think this outdated junk with old engines, old fuselage, old systems is 'safe'? Good luck with that one.
@@howlr747 do you mean the 1967 Boeing 737?
@@howlr747 Boeing IS Better????
😂😂😂😂
Not now
@howlr747 My guy you're lagging some 30 years
That's a myth. Look it up. 2 engines mean less problems.
36 years later Russia releases the A340
A340 is made by several European countries. Russia made this plane alone. Only US and Russia can do that.
@@evelinamillionesyou didn’t get the joke
@@southside2459she/him shim is american
@@wadehiggins1114 I don’t get your joke
Tell me you know nothing about IL96 without telling you know nothing about IL96
Fun fact: first version of IL-96 (without the modification) take his first fly in 1988, Soo al who say what is IL-96 is airbus A340, is wrong
I love the Il-96. At least the Cubana and Aeroflot versions I flew on. Comfy and love the air vent in front of me! Hopefully this one will have better IFE and WiFi maybe!
wifi hahah
@@benjicool2808 Well to be fair… most airlines in North America are only getting it now.
@@benjicool2808are you laughing about western over prized craps,?
russian planes will never have WiFi
@@rocketman1058 Some already do though…
I love this, make planes weird again. Kinda bored with a320s and 737s...
That's what I loved about the old Soviet Union era aircraft. They looked so strange. It was like Boeing, Lockheed and BOAC knew that the KGB had infiltrated their companies. So they purposefully made up plans for their spies to find. Once they got the bogus plans back behind the iron curtain. They soon realized the problem, but they made them work anyway.
yes build more yu.....
It’s comes down to fuel efficiency weirdness isn’t profitable which is why they have no place.
@@lv7603no place? Why are B-747 and A-340 in service yet? In 2019 or 2020 even were announced new orders of B-747
@@pedropalotes7638LMFAO. Who's gonna tell him?
It is based on basic IL-86 aircraft produced by Russia in 1980 for Olympic-1980 games held in Moscow
737 is in production since 60s.
The Olympics that popularized Adidas in Russia!
It’s based on the IL-96.
The other way around@@DannoAviation
Wow, those engines look like they are from the 70s
They are military and super reliable
The whole plane looks like its from the 70s.
Actually, the PS90A turbofan engine "family" was developed by the Soloviev Design Bureau in the mid-1980s. It was the Soviet Union's first commercial high bypass turbofan.
@@brittsaunders4621 By that standard… you can say the Trent family was developed from the RB211’s of the 1970s
@@maestromecanico597 Yes, minus the winglets...
Engines are 30% less efficient than A340 but Prices are 200% more efficient. Still cheaper to operate than any Airbus or Boeing models.
What is the performance of the power plants? Service ceiling? Range? Maintenance cycle? Operating cost on short and long hauls…?
Why? Are you thinking of buying one?
Better than the rubbish Pratt & Whitney
Kinda looks like its from the 80's...
Because it is.
Because it is, like A320 and a340.
But still at least not from the 60s, like the 737.
I wouldn't be surprised if russias aviation industry will look like it did in the 1970's once again
If that also means more crashes than the entire 737 series 3 fold, then I also expect that too if Russia's aviation industry turns back to the 1970s.
clown are you blind? the Russian plane is superior to its competitors and therefore will never be allowed into the West
Doubt it. Their workforce is rapidly decreasing.
@@arvedludwig3584 How can workforce be decreasing (with constant technology) while production is increasing?
@@Rusich945 Superior, by what? Tell me.
Tipical in Russia: "The brand new very old thing"
Welp, most popular Boeing and Airbus models are ancient design too. Just cause why would you change something that works perfectly right?
Brainwashed
@@bloodst0rm1337 👍
Like brand new 1960s 737 max?
Or the brand new 320neo from the 80s?
This new IL-96-400M aircraft was equipped with four PS90A engines that already existed but in future could be equipped with the new PD35 engines that are under development and in this case only two engines will be used.
I'm just here for the ridiculous american racism that makes them think no one else in the world is capable of technology of any kind. 🤷🤣
Russia is capable of technology... of the 90s
@@azurefire7266 thank you proving me right about american racism. 👏
@@azurefire7266 immediately
@@azurefire7266 nevermind america uses bombers from the early 50's
@@tylerdurden4006They only use them because they've done extensive modernizations.
Welcome to 1986.
Il-96 first flight was in September 1988.
4 engine, 3 flight crews… feels like 1980s instead of 2023
More safety, I approve.
@@DanMaverick22this isn’t about safety
@@Sedna063 дело...
there will be the day when the Russian aispace (the most valuable aispace between eastern asia - europe and north america - whole asia) will be allowed only with the Russian made aicrafts ... checkmate!
So many haters in the comments but I love that this has 4 engines and was created in the modern age when everyone else goes 2 engine. What would the range on this aircraft be?
You may love it, but airlines are interested in twinjets. The 80s are over, mate.
Range is 5400 nm, so below average for modern widebodies.
The range is all the way to the crash site! 🤔
You're asking about range with 4 old fashioned engines? How quaint.
It's all political because they've been told that Russia is "bad" (meanwhile, USA and Israel are "good", right?). Real aviation enthusiasts love this development and I'm sure would love to fly on one, myself included.
@@dennisrettke There is nothing political about this, the plane is not up for todays standards.
I’m hoping its aged platform can mean more reliability and won’t kill too many people.
The IL86/96 platform has never killed anybody.
Good point and here's the there were no fatal accidents involving the airframe on the other hand the Airbus equivalent A330/A340 family had serious accidents.
@@EpicThe112 In the last 35 years, only 33 il-96s have ever been made, while Airbus has delivered over 1,800 330s and 340s. The fewer airplanes, the lesser the chances of airplane accidents.
@@MODECHARLIE true...but there again, they don't fly much, do they...?!
@@johnstuartsmith Thanks for telling me about that
Humankind air travel shouldn’t monopoly by Boeing & Airbus,, Welcome Russia , China and Another Country come to developing aircraft for Humankind
Russian, humankind, those are two words that should never be used in the same sentence.
Well done to them. They have achieved their own modern wide body aircraft where most other developed countries have failed, and without the need for various nations building various parts of the structure 👍
lol... ignorance is bold !... 4 engines were done looooooooooong time ago and are not in use anymore for 20 years (exception made to the very large A380) !... if you know nothing about this topic, better no to comment !...
I wanted to give u a detailed answer about aviation, my experience and jet engines history .. but decided against wasting my time @@oldowleye3161
@@oldowleye3161 could you enumerate countries which achieved that?
@@superdingo9741 ...don't cry bot
@@oldowleye3161he's probably one of those Vatniks.
I equate Russian technology to that of Klingon technology in the Star Trek universe. It works but it's crude
Plus it’s mostly stolen!
@@harstoft The West stole 600 billion state reserves from Russia. Themselves are fools.
@@harstofttired old trope at this point.
Stop reading comics and it will pass
Fuel efficiency is boss. I like tri jets but understand why they aren’t popular among carriers.
Russia has its own cheap fuel...
@@user-dz3fj6xz4dand so?
It could be cheap only in aviation for jet fuel. Because in gas stations fuel is up to hell prices expensive and not profitable for people cause to bustard government trying to be against of the world and people: native and foreign
Russian oil is the boss
hope russian aviation can be back on its feet once again. always love those giant planes.
Yeah, that's Ukraine you're thinking of.
if you are thinking antonov thats ukraine.
@@DavidOfWhitehillsthat's not ukraine to be honest..that's USSR.
@@joe91IMand now Ukraine
@@DavidOfWhitehills nothing to do with Ukraine, apart from the physical location.
It’ll probably still lack overhead bins in the middle 😂
Ticket prices due to fuel burn will probably be higher now, unless the state starts ticket subsidies.
It's probably the only option for Russians to travel. People WILL pay the higher prices, if it's their sole option. Besides, that profits that this company Ilyushin makes can be used to develop better aircraft.
Russia will once again dominate aviation.
@@Sanyu-Tumusiime😂😂😂
@@Sanyu-Tumusiime 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I'm guessing it fly's by burning old cooking-fat oil, collected from restaurants and cafes lol
@@swanvictor887 clown even west europe have their energy supply from russia. they have plenty oil you uneducated people.
To me, four engines suggests they don't trust the engines enough to only have two.
They don't have engines that are powerful enough to use just two. The engines on this 400M are the equivalent of the PW2000's
Why not have only one engine if there is so much trust then?
They will probably re engine it with the PD-35
@@julienckjm7430use your brain
this airfraime was engineered for 4. And I'm all for it ! ))
Sounds like these could be existing un-used Il-96-400T cargo versions converted to carry passagers. No indication these are new constructions. Most likely because of the embargo and Russian not being able to access Boeing or Airbus aircraft and parts. Both versions use Russian made electronics, etc.
Congratulations to the Russians for re-inventing the A340-200.
Welcome to the 1980s Russia!
Does your country produce planes on its own? In 2023
You are not welcome.
You do realize most of the planes you fly in the west were originally designed in the 60s-80s?
@@evelinamilliones Is the Russian bot’s feelings hurt by its own country’s hilarious incompetence at building anything?
@@dylan8389 thanks to the sanctioning, this incompetence is to be overcame at least in critical sectors. Demand creates supply! And workforce deficit makes blue-collar wages soar.
it looks so short but long at the same time lmao
It is pretty wide, maybe is that. Over 6 meters, I think.
Could be cuz Russian companies like to make their vertical stabilizers Huge.
So proud of Russia 🇷🇺👍🇷🇺😘
1999 called, it wants its airplane back
I’m sure the Iranians will buy some.
Inchallah
It's very expensive
Great. Now return the 700+ aircraft you stole.
Who stole?
@@user-dy6qf5yd5q russian terrorist state
When the owner refuses to take your money for his things caught in circumstances and cant' be returned - very strange, very Western definition of theft
@@beibotanovда они просто гопники, которые не на того напали.
Чучело, ты за базар отвечать собираешься? Или ты, как ваши тупые лидеры, вякнул и в кусты?
When I saw 2 engines on one side in the thumbnail, I was hoping it's just clickbait, but unfortunately not.
Why?
What is the "Ukrainian crisis of 2014"?
Do you mean Moscow's annexation of the Donbass and Crimea?
So what should have been done? Russia had to withdraw itself from everything to have what, the NATO fleet in Sevastopol?
I wonder who's going to get this outside of Russia and my guesses are Cuba possibly Iran and North Korea. For Cubana this might work to replace their 2007 vintage IL-96-300 additionally Irkut MS-21-310s to replace their Tu-204s if Sanctions are lifted MS-21-300 with PW1400G
Arabic, Indian, Chinese people
@@evelinamillionesno
Пиндос,ты думал что ты властелин мира?
@@paulc4302 there will be the day when the Russian airspace (the most valuable airspace between eastern asia - europe and north america - whole asia) will be allowed only with the Russian made aicrafts ... checkmate!
American rockets with Russian engines - RD 180 to this day! Americans don’t complain and even ask that the RD-180 not be included in the sanctions!
Lol, it's a nothing burger. Like its smaller variant, the 300, nobody beyond Russia and Cuba will buy it because it'll be inefficient, unreliable, and full of maintenance/parts supply problems. Another Russian flop.
It's aiming domestic market
The four engine option is no more ideal due more maintenance cost and higher fuel consumption
It's more trustworthy than the twin engine especially crossing vast stretches of water
Safety.
@@tenton459 Almost all long haul widebody passenger planes use only two engines and so far without bigger problems.
A380 using 4.
@@tenton459 A340 was designed in 1980s.
Since you edited your message I'll do the same: A380 is no longer in production.
Thank you I stick with Boeing and Airbus.
You have that option.
Russia does NOT due to sanctions.
They don't offer it to you
I love the plane and I need one.
Wow the engines look pretty low bypass
So does your brain !
Third world countries are waiting patiently for this soviet technological miracle. Afghanistan and other industrialized countries can finally stop using camels and donkeys.
BTW, I have $100 to invest. Can I buy two of those 'airplanes'?
Yeah, they're about thirty years behind Boeing and Airbus.
All producers gave up 4 engines, the russians started it. That means vision.🤣🤣🤣
Great so Russia has caught up with the early 1990s.
More up-to date than their cars!
100% Russo ! All parts made in Rússia !
So avoid! Do not fly on this junk!
First thing that crossed my mind. Modernised 707
After 15 beers?
Il-96 was outdated design even by the early 90th standards (when it entered production). By today's standards it's just ancient design. Pretty sure when there are going to be talks of actually buying it Aeroflot would try to get out of the deal by stalling the deal with additional requirements like they do now with Tu-204.
Due to the four engines?
They have no other choice, cant buy western planes.
What exactly about its airframe is so outdated? Or what, do you think it's still got soviet-era internals and materials?
Ru$$ia is the only country that can make airplanes independently.
Airbus and Boeing outsource many of their components.
Incredibly, despite the sanctions, they still manage to do something unique!
😎
@@x-gamessimulator1067 doing like 3 per year
Honestly i quite like these new planes being built, at least it's a change from the constant boeing airbus duopoly
What's the point? It's not like they gonna use it anyway?
New?
@@nntflow7058they’ll use it within countries that have relations with Russia
@@maxsaviation9512Countries that have relationships with Russia will still buy Western unless they themselves are sanctioned. Look at Iran - they managed to buy enough spares to keep their old Boeing and Airbus jets flying, plus buy some more, before the door slammed shut again.
2:55 BUTTER
Airforceproud95 reference?
@@airplanenut89 yøs
@@BillyCrabtree-ob6py Nice.
With cheap Russian Oil, it's does not matter about fuel cost, does it ? It will work for the Russian domestic market, no matter what.
You are mistaken, because you have no idea about the new Russian aircraft engines of the series: PD-8; PD-10; PD-14; PD-35
Russia has been kicked into top gear in all branches of development now there is no stopping of Russia on the world stage.
Beautiful aircraft
I hope this time it will be ready for the 1980 Moscow Olympics.
Looks like it is the best airplane maker in the world. No other country has done it on its own.
Aka Boeing 747
The USA used to do it on its own. In ol' good days...
@superdingo9741 Yeah, those simple times, very little technology. You about the time when the first supersonic passenger plane was made all by Russia or earlier?
Remember when in the 1970's a newly formed conglomerate of small european plane makers made the very first TWIN engine widebody? Yes, without the help of Boeing nor Douglas.
Ilushin is almost 50 years out of date
Ancient Soviet Cold War technology…….Don’t fly it over my house !
Eh, I've heard good things about the Cubana planes which are only gonna turn 20 recently. It seems like they do take care of them (they kinda have to, considering they can't get replacements easily).
@@Fay7666 those planes have little little flight hours
@@henson2k what are you talking about? they are always in the air mostly
Who's gonna buy it outside of Russia?
China and Russia will benefit for sure from this technological marvell.
Anyone in BRICS. So like 70 per cent of the world population.
Your mom ))
@@mirekslechta7161 technological marvel? Lolll
4 engines with the current oil pricing and with the fierce competition from the twin engine aircrafts;
Shorter than the competition's aircrafts;
Less passengers than the competition's aircraft.
Yeah, the soviet success story. :))))
No one is buying this. Not even Aeroflot
Aeroflot will be the first and biggest operator of this type don't worry
@@jettrd_utilitychnl4230 Aeroflot is government owned, so essentially they’re just flying aircraft that are also government owned. So I wouldn’t call it “sales“
Why the engine haven't upgraded yet ??
Id trust flying on this more then the new Chinese marrow body.
Still likely much worse than Boeing's or Airbus worst aircrafts
While the world is shifting to powerful twin engine jets, Russia is not concern to let say fuel efficiency.
You did not hear the author right. These engines are modified ones, more efficient.
They are more fuel efficient than the twin engines!
@@rickymwamba9681how?
@@Max-xw3ouit might be more fuel efficient than its predecessor, but i guess current twin engines by rolls royce and GE are still more efficient
@@jaysonjose5675а ты не думай, тебе это вредно.
Still flying 4 engine jets?
"New"
4 jet engines means more oparating costs
Enough fuel in Russia
@@evelinamilliones Yes, and more safty.
@@evelinamillionesno
Will be subsidized by russian government
It’s good , I filed on Il 96 from SVO to capital Armenia, was very comfortable, silent and spacey . The inside interior tose time Hase the standard of the 60 ties .
Может 50- х?
suitable for countries under years of heavy sanctions
The perfect plane to replace the a350
You are joking, right?
lol no.
Yes, and much safer to fly with. Everyone knows that.
@@ollienilson1644 no ones going to pick this over the A350
@@ollienilson1644shut up
At least , it's NOT American !
And how does that make it better?
@@azurefire7266 it doesn’t.
Is it just me or does it looks abit like the a340?
funnily enough, the plane it's based on (Ilyushin 86) had been flying since before the A340 was even produced.
@@spitfiremkiv339 Omg so does it means airbus copied them ?😂
Lol the A340 looks like it
@@kingnat4874more like, this is how any standard moden-ish tubeliner with 4 engines would look
@@federico339 ohh okay
Straight outta the 90s lol
captain Serghei Sughkoch….was very impress with the plane they said.
Great news! It will help the world from the duopoly that's at present.
With no computer components inside, it would all be basically 70s technology at best. 😆
@@aantonic They're not under sanctions, so they're allowed to have computer chips.
It’s completely digital and Russia makes its own avionics clown boy..
@@jayspik6498 They make cheap copies of the US because they're isolated, I know that already.
@@jayspik6498 Are you proud that russians depend on the USA for very simple things like youtube?
@@ChadwickTheChadRussia has its own search engine and youtube equivalent apps.
I'd say this smacks of fuel efficiency and smart economical savings :)
Just like Russia to be years behind. Four engines are so last century 😂
Just like most things in Russia - it’s stuck in the past
When have you last been to Russia to make this comment grounded?
The brand new obsolate aircraft
It's a good receiver of IL-86
Whatever that means
4 engines, pretty cool!
Yes. Safty.
Yes. Safty.
They kept the landing gear lowered like what Boeing did with the 747-100 Prototype in 1969.
That's standard for test flights
It's good to know how landing gear down affect drag.
and they also fly on wings, like those plywood planes from the 30s
Nice aircraft. They need to keep making domestic aircraft regardless of world events. imo
I’d actually love to fly this!
@@Instasamps do you also joke about the 9/11 attacks?
@@dennisrettke no I don’t
@@Instasamps Then why make such comment? Do you think it's acceptable?
@@dennisrettke sorry karen
Временный вариант для широкофюзеляжных
Не похоже что англоязычные комментаторы это понимают)
Well done, Russia! Whatever sort of progress that can be made by any country, to break up Boeing's and Airbus' market dominance, is good news! 👍💯
Fuel is cheap in Russia, incase ur wondering why 4 engines
I'd say Russia had better get started manufacturing these post haste, because they cannot buy from or be supported by Boeing or Airbus.
Finally, the US and West have lost the Russian aviation market by shooting themselves in the foot with their reckless sanctions. However, Russia is not bothered at all and has shown resilience to independently develop further their own aviation industry.
😂😂😂 that is the only choise they have
With the entire aviation industry moving to two engines for large passenger aircraft, Russia has decided to turn back the clock to the 1980s.
Our manufacturers don't have modern emgines for two engine aircraft. New engine PD-35 is developing. It's "young brother" PD-14 will be the main engine for new russian airplanes.
4 engines, it's safer dude
Lovely!