Part One ••••••••••••••••••• 0:00 - first solo mm. 1-15 1:20 - first theme mm. 16-27 2:50 - bridge mm. 28-31 3:07 - second theme mm. 32-39 Part Two ••••••••••••••••••• 3:44 - second solo mm. 40-48 4:36 - first theme from m. 49 6:12 - first build-up m. 63-80 [(6:50 - fragment of first theme, from 7:16 continuation of the build-up)(6:44 vs 7:28 vs 18:52)] 8:08 - second theme from m. 81 8:40 - closing material theme Part Three ••••••••••••••••••• 10:04 - third solo mm. 105-111 10:46 - development of the material of the bridge of the exposition (11:29, 11:50, 12:21 hallucination of the first theme)(12:31, hallucination of the second theme)(12:42, retransition toward recapitulation) 13:09 - first theme (united with its inversion) from m. 141 14:00 - instability increases (transition into second theme) 14:23 - second theme m. 153 15:13 - variation on second theme Part Four ••••••••••••••••••• 16:33 - first theme 17:15 - variation of the solo theme 18:08 - Climax (18:52) mm. 194-212 Part Five ••••••••••••••••••• 19:40 - first theme 20:03 - second theme 21:09 - variation of the first theme 21:58 - first coda 22:48 - fourth solo 23:22 - first theme (hallucinated) 23:54 - second theme (hallucinated) 24:16 - climax resolves 25:15 - sublime realization
This Adagio doesn't need any other symphony movements to be the greatest symphony ever composed on this planet ! I still remember the moment when i heard first time this shocking climax after lull 17:15 before this storm 18:0818:52 and when he looks back to the introducing theme 22:48 it takes my breath every time when i hear this - but he transforms the traumatic moment into deliverance in the end of this incredible work ... :) Thank you for uploading this phantastic version !
Incdredible! the genius of Mahler how in the 28:52 more less, when the cluster begins with tremendous sonority and a heartbreaking chord , i've heard some musician say that cannot stand listening this chord for a long time because it is irresistible . You can see in the score how Mahler arrived to the dodecaphonic harmony , only 3 notes were missing ,E natural,A sharp and C , and it is more , it was totally natural harmony from his personal painfull , he was not looking for the "dodecaphonism", that is why yhe "Vienna group" had the first inspiration in Gustav Mahler. Thanks Jakob BRAVO!
Sure you do, just give them more than a try, I used to not like Mahler, even the Adagietto wasn't so special for me, till I've tried to understand and study his music and now my life have been changed because of his music, There is so much emotion and beauty in Mahler's music that I can't describe in words, just give it more tries
@@rezam5993 ' just give it more tries' may seem like rudimentary advice and yet this is the key to so much art, and easily overlooked. For example, I remember being perplexed by Berg's Chamber Concerto when i first encountered it but listened repeatedly until i grew to have a liking/understanding. The easy availability on youtube can mitigate against this approach but important to resist :)
I know this is a classic recording of this piece and is the only one that completely satisfies me. I'd like to buy the cd if anyone has any information on it.
An F# major 9 chord with similar voicing and orchestration would actually make a satisfying cadence, of course this would completely destroy the point and impact of the chord, but it would at least make harmonic sense.
@@WEEBLLOM sharps and flats in the key signature do not create dissonance or atonality. they are there to preserve order in the land of F-sharp. You would never be allowed to visit F-sharp with out there first being 6 sharps.
"I do not own the rights..." Then why are you posting it? Other people worked and studied for years and years to make this performance possible. How are they compensated from your posting?
If you intended the orchestra score it is called “full score”, but is the same music and much easier to follow here on an horizontal screen compare to the massive vertical layout of the moltitude of instrument required.
Part One •••••••••••••••••••
0:00 - first solo mm. 1-15
1:20 - first theme mm. 16-27
2:50 - bridge mm. 28-31
3:07 - second theme mm. 32-39
Part Two •••••••••••••••••••
3:44 - second solo mm. 40-48
4:36 - first theme from m. 49
6:12 - first build-up m. 63-80 [(6:50 - fragment of first theme, from 7:16 continuation of the build-up)(6:44 vs 7:28 vs 18:52)]
8:08 - second theme from m. 81
8:40 - closing material theme
Part Three •••••••••••••••••••
10:04 - third solo mm. 105-111
10:46 - development of the material of the bridge of the exposition (11:29, 11:50, 12:21 hallucination of the first theme)(12:31, hallucination of the second theme)(12:42, retransition toward recapitulation)
13:09 - first theme (united with its inversion) from m. 141
14:00 - instability increases (transition into second theme)
14:23 - second theme m. 153
15:13 - variation on second theme
Part Four •••••••••••••••••••
16:33 - first theme
17:15 - variation of the solo theme
18:08 - Climax (18:52) mm. 194-212
Part Five •••••••••••••••••••
19:40 - first theme
20:03 - second theme
21:09 - variation of the first theme
21:58 - first coda
22:48 - fourth solo
23:22 - first theme (hallucinated)
23:54 - second theme (hallucinated)
24:16 - climax resolves
25:15 - sublime realization
This Adagio doesn't need any other symphony movements
to be the greatest symphony ever composed on this planet !
I still remember the moment when i heard first time this shocking climax
after lull 17:15 before this storm 18:08 18:52
and when he looks back to the introducing theme 22:48
it takes my breath every time when i hear this
- but he transforms the traumatic moment into deliverance
in the end of this incredible work ... :)
Thank you for uploading this phantastic version !
Incdredible! the genius of Mahler how in the 28:52 more less, when the cluster begins with tremendous sonority and a heartbreaking chord , i've heard some musician say that cannot stand listening this chord for a long time because it is irresistible . You can see in the score how Mahler arrived to the dodecaphonic harmony , only 3 notes were missing ,E natural,A sharp and C , and it is more , it was totally natural harmony from his personal painfull , he was not looking for the "dodecaphonism", that is why yhe "Vienna group" had the first inspiration in Gustav Mahler. Thanks Jakob BRAVO!
marcelouz1 you erroneously type 28 instead of 18.
@@matteogenerani5097 Oh! thanks sorry.
marcelouz1 no problem! Good point though
18:52
@@sneddypie oh !That is correct. Sorry!, it is because of the emotion ...
What a piece....no words can match it
In the opening andante, I can really hear where some of Shostakovich’s influence came from
Opening of the adagio sounds like some of the soundtrack from the film "Jesus of Nazareth"
we'll never know
I got major chills at 18:08
This theme in 2:39 is soooo beautiful! It is My favorite symphony ever and I don't like other Mahler's works.
Sure you do, just give them more than a try, I used to not like Mahler, even the Adagietto wasn't so special for me, till I've tried to understand and study his music and now my life have been changed because of his music, There is so much emotion and beauty in Mahler's music that I can't describe in words, just give it more tries
@@rezam5993 ' just give it more tries' may seem like rudimentary advice and yet this is the key to so much art, and easily overlooked. For example, I remember being perplexed by Berg's Chamber Concerto when i first encountered it but listened repeatedly until i grew to have a liking/understanding. The easy availability on youtube can mitigate against this approach but important to resist :)
I know this is a classic recording of this piece and is the only one that completely satisfies me. I'd like to buy the cd if anyone has any information on it.
Claudio Abbado with Lucerne Festival Orchestra
Terror (18:52) vs Peace (24:47)
nice thank you, been looking for this
Does anyone know which recording this is? This is the best interpretation in my opinion.
Sorry , the missing notes are E natural ,F sharp, and A sharp.
18:52... How can a chord like this be resolved?... (18:08 for more context)
...24:39 is the salvator, which can give hope after the darkness.
An F# major 9 chord with similar voicing and orchestration would actually make a satisfying cadence, of course this would completely destroy the point and impact of the chord, but it would at least make harmonic sense.
24:47 Première musique spectrale ?
18:51
Where do you find the piano reduction ? Is it possible to have it please ?
Thank you.
Search on IMSLP.org is an archive of free scores, MIDI files and audios :)
Scriabin is my dog it isn't in IMSLP. I am looking this reduction but I can find it
up, still not on IMSLP
hmmm i'm verrrryyyyy late here but
en.scorser.com/Out/300562297.html
there
@@unnamed_boi thank you !!
19:10
17:16
23:22
Is it possible to have this reduction?
en.scorser.com/Out/300562297.html
1:20
Never seen so many double sharps in a score! It's almost atonal ....
double sharps mean nothing. It's like saying your 3rd cousin once removed is less of a person and not really a human.
@@needtoknowbasis3499 what
@@WEEBLLOM sharps and flats in the key signature do not create dissonance or atonality. they are there to preserve order in the land of F-sharp. You would never be allowed to visit F-sharp with out there first being 6 sharps.
@@needtoknowbasis3499 Yeah I just don't really understand the example you used
To think he wrote this because his wife was cheating on him, I would do the same tbh
Have you seen Death In Venice?
He wrote this while he was dying, think about his wife, dead daughter and his death
I find my death ceremony
"I do not own the rights..." Then why are you posting it? Other people worked and studied for years and years to make this performance possible. How are they compensated from your posting?
by ppl buying tickets to the concert this is taken from
What are you talking about lol
If you liked that, you'll probably like this, too: czcams.com/video/AIAzkO60sWc/video.html
This is no score. This is piano reduction. Please, get your terms right. Otherwise, thanks for publishing.
a piano reduction is also a score
The symphony was first written on piano anyway.
If you intended the orchestra score it is called “full score”, but is the same music and much easier to follow here on an horizontal screen compare to the massive vertical layout of the moltitude of instrument required.
This is not score. Please, get your grammar right. Otherwise, thanks for commcenting.
@@kimjeongyeon5640 No, the grammar is fine. You can however say '' this is not a score."
14:07
1:20
Its beautiful