"This ray tracing implementation isnt runningon the RT core" "This ray tracing implementation is path tracing" It isn't path traced at all. That would basically require an RT accelerator(RT core on RTX cards). Path tracing is basically just total ray tracing, where every bounce of light and possible connotation be it GI, reflections, shadows, AO etc is calculated purely through ray tracing. To date there are only 3 or 4 games that do this. It was originally a software based ray tracing solution created by Crytek under the SVOGII banner. However, as you had experimental RT boost mode turned on, it does actually use the RT cores fully. If you had that unchecked, it wouldn't be using them The Can It Run Crysis Preset is so intensive because it removes any level of detail constraints. Everything is rendered at max LOD to the horizon, and shadows etc are drawn also out to the horizon rather than having a certain cut off point.
@@zWORMzGaming Sorry if that read like a know-it-all comment man, I read it back and was like "damn that actually sounds like I'm just throwing stuff out there" :) Good video as always
@@Kim-fm2vo Currently the only path traced games are Quake 2 RTX , Minecraft, Cyberpunk and Portal although those two arent released yet. Cyberpunks is the new RT Overdrive patch, Portal RTX is announced but unreleased so far. im out at pub watching football, if you want info its quicker to google it yourself than wait for a reply in future :)
@@Kim-fm2vo There are write-ups on Nvidia's website for most titles that implement any form of hardware ray-tracing. Ammanus is right, there are only 3 or 4 games that use RT for most or all types of both direct and bounce lighting.
2000s were crazy. We got Halo: Combat Evolved in 2001, then Far Cry in 2004 and Crysis in 2007. The graphics progressed so fast within just three years! I remember how GPUs were evolving crazy fast, and became obsolete after one-two years. Nowadays, you could run 2019 game maxed out and its not really different from 2022 game...
The bigger question since 2022 will be, "Can you afford running 4090's energy costs?" or "Can you survive with 4090 in the room during summer? Challenge!".
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator most states seem to be 12 cents per kwh, between 12-30. according to overclockers (uk) at 19p per kwh (around 20 cents) playing just one single hour a day on a modest gaming rig will cost £14 ($17) a month, so not much over 2 hrs a day would already take you over 40 dollars. assuming a 4090 uses more energy, it may be more
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator Your calculations are wrong. At 600W peak of the 4090 (just GPU, not the rest of the rig) you are calculating with 12 cents per-hour (since 0.6kw x 20$ kwh), So running 4090 at peak (imagine crypto miner or 24/7 game with unlocked FPS) you are at 86 usd/month. Secondly US has artificially low energy costs since the governmnet is subsidizing hydrocarbons (even more than solar) and US has no environmental protections burning that stuff. Most of the world has higher energy costs. For example here in EU even inside country mostly powered by nukes we are at ~50 - 60 cents per kwh, effectively doubling that price. Plus if you wanna play in summer and let the AC running, you need roughly 1,5W of cooling to get rid of 1W of heat (due efficiency losses of ACs). So these GPUs are quickly becoming the most expensive piece of households. As someone who has two kids plus my own work/play rig, that is a multiplication of all this in household. I am personally very much for governments to step in and do efficiency/power limits on GPUs just like we have efficiency laws for cars as this is getting ridiculous.
I still remember how in 2007 Gametrailers (RIP) didnt even nominate Crysis for best graphics that year, because they couldnt get to run it smoothly on their PCs xDD what a joke....
This game was so revolutionary for its time. What I cant beleave is that I remember thinking how good games would get after this and honestly they never made a huge leap from this. Small improvments but we def hit a roof.
Yeah man i used to think back in the days that this game had the best graphics ever but now, seeing how all games looks, there isn't a very big difference!
@@aspirewot8408 truly the difference is minimal, if you ran them side by side in fps mode they look the same out in the jungle, in fact, crysis looks better.
It can but I would love to see it being done on the ascension mission. This game was developed in an era where MHZ and GHZ were thought to be king instead of cores. Even on a 5ghz cpu that level can drop you down below 60fps. I would imagine if CPU's were 8ghz today then this game would run like a dream.
I mean tbf the first mainstream quad-core cpu, the Q6600 released in Q1 of 2007, so the devs didn't even have the chance to optimize it for more than 2 cores, let alone 8 lol. Not to mention the Q6600 was single-threaded as well on top of that. If only the game released half a decade later, during the bulldozer AMD era of cpus...
@@dan2800 No, we don't. You are confusing LN2 overclock with boost clocks. 13900K boosts to 5.8GHz on P-cores and AMD Ryzen R9 7950x to 5.7GHz. (That's one core most of the time) We had AMD's FX-8370 that ran at 8722.78 MHz under LN2 in Aug 2014 that got beaten after 8 years by 13900K with 8812.85 MHz. That took some time. Anyways. Having the highest clock speed isn't everything. There are many variables that play a huge role such as IPC and Cache (which is going to be massive with AMD's "new" 3D stacked Cache). So yeah.
Just as a reminder, the top-of-the-line GPU from 2007, a 8800 GTX, had about 681 million transistors, and was supposed to be the top of the line GPU that was going to be able to "run" Crysis in 2007. The RTX 4090 has 78 BILLION transistors, or a cool 114 times more transistors than the 8800 GTX.
I remember playing the original on intel hd 2000 and i3 2120 playing on around 20-30 fps thinking the game looks awesome even on low setting and now being able to play the remaster on very high on 60+ avg fps is just heartwhelming
@@-bees-5704 -not in my country, we have plenty of stock- nvm apparently they all sold out in 2 days loool hard part is getting the 4700 bucks it costs lmfaoo
I get more than 30 on mediium setting thogh it's only 768p but the pont is my laptop can play all pre 2012 or 2013 games perfectly fine except gta 4, that game is just a cpu hog and needs atleast 4 physical cores and my 7200u has only 2
br0 why are u so damn entertaining i cant stop watching its just video game benchmarks i can watch anyone else but for some reason ur just so fun and different from all the others
Am so happy that you made a video about Crysis 1 (2007) running on RTX 4090 i didn't see any make it, i think you are the first 1, Thank you so much! I hope you have a good day!
The original Crysis was made with the thought that cpu's would just get extremely high frequencies in the future instead of getting more and more cores. Thats why having more than 2 cores actually does not make a difference, only single thread performance matters really.
The physics and graphics of this game are incredible. It’s better than a lot of modern games. It’s extremely demanding at native 4K ultra settings with RT, but the 4090 gets over a stable 60 FPS with ease. What a monster this GPU is.
@@MousePotato Then something is wrong with your PC. I have checked out multiple different CZcamsrs who have tested the 4090 at native 4K max settings with RT in this game and they get similar FPS to zWORMz.
“Who’s gonna keep you warm” The PS4 when you switch to max graphics so that it can run crysis sounded like Chernobyl explosion. It makes you warm. Mentally and physically💀💀💀
Remember getting pretty solid frames on this back with my Q6600 and 9800 GTX+ I believe I had back then. Maybe not on all Very High or selective but it was playable for sure. Now I didn't have FPS counters at the time but I'm sure it was probably in the 20s or 30s (certainly not 60 FPS+). It's neat to see how far things have come but at the same time remembering that Crysis 1 was heavily unoptimized by today's standards as well. Nice video down memory lane!
when I get some money im going to join your channel. I have watched like 40 of your videos and they always answer my questions and your very kind and smart and i love your sense of humor. i hope all is well and look forward to your future videos thanks again
Me to my Intel HD Graphics 2500 from i3 3210 from 2012 : Can you run Crysis ? My PC : Oh god, spare me, please ? I don't have much time. * Coughs (x2) *
It's a great disappointment that modern games these days don't support cutting down tree or breaking various objects, while Crysis did it a long time ago.
I remember in 2007 thinking wow I wonder how games will look in 10 plus years but it seems alot of today's games have gone backwards with graphics and in game physics..
In 2022 raytracing is just not necessary. All it does is add a few shiny bits here and there, reflections become mirrors instead of diffuse and adds a couple of variations in shadows and that's about it. Hardly something you are going to notice when playing a game. And Nvidia wants to charge you double what their cards are worth for that....
If I remember correctly, there are some settings in the original Crysis that you can set to "Ultra high" quality, but you need to do it manually instead of just picking the very high preset. So you were probably not using the actual max settings in these benchmarks! *edit* I think it was the water setting that has an ultra option.
That was in the times when some of us could only run it in DX9 (high) but originally, the game was MUCH more advanced with a higher quality lighting and textures r. of polygons but it was reduced to what we got in 2007.
Fun fact this game works better in ultrawide than a fair few games of this decade.. The only odd thing about it is cutscenes are developed for 16:9 so when you end up seeing stuff off screen that your not supposed to and it can be pretty funny. OG crysis is a beast.. Multiplayer was a bit strange to get into but yeah good game. Great test of cpu single thread performance alter in the game with all the tanks and vtol vehicle things happening freezing and shit.. I remember trying to run it at 1920x1200 on a gtx480 and amd phenom II X4 945 processor.. my fps was owwie. This game is proof that in the older days they really did try to do the next level stuff with games rather than just the usual unreal engine with shiny glossy bollocks going on and some average wack ass gameplay
After crysis I couldn't go back to consoles. I find them really interesting and keep up to date with them, even admit that a series X is more powerful than my pc, but stil, something clicked back then.
Can you test Crysis 1 with mod "Crysis Enhanced Edition" + "Optional 4K/8K textures pack" + "Ultra autoexec.cfg" at 4K with MSAA 8x and star the game go to the first beach please?
I mean, Crysis isn't really demanding in terms of GPU power, but rather CPU. Anyone can "run" Crysis. The question is, can you run it well. I'd wager the higher FPS here is due to the CPU, and it basically being "vanilla" Crysis. Most people these days mod it with HD textures and have new graphics and settings enabled that aren't in the original (SSR, higher LOD, Real time reflections, SSAO, Global illumination, better shadows, volumetric clouds, better vegetation quality and density, and better anti-aliasing etc.) Naturally, all these new or better settings become much more demanding. I've always gotten Crysis to run at 60+ FPS before with merely an i5 6400 and an RTX 2060 Super. My new PC, with an i5 10400, RTX 3060 Ti, and 16 GB of RAM struggles to keep the FPS above 40 or 50 because the game uses the new "Crysis Enhanced Edition" mod. Maybe I would get higher FPS with a 4090, but Crysis is more demanding on the CPU, and it would be my CPU that's currently the bottleneck as opposed to the GPU. Crysis only uses 2 cores. So a CPU like the author of this video is using is more powerful because it's an 8 core/16 thread processor with a base clock of 3.4 and 4.5 max boost clock. And Crysis always benefits from much higher clocks than more cores.
they're all in on it - constantly making games more cpu and gpu demanding so people keep upgrading or buying new stuff otherwise those industries would pretty much fail if people could use a computer from 5-10 years ago to keep playing new titles and never have to buy something new they milked it for years with CD-ROM drives, the research and development people knew 52x speed was a safe limit to prevent CD's from exploding , and so they released the 1x speed CD ROM drives, then 2x, 4x, etc etc made money off people as long as possible, then release the dvd discs and so on the whole damn planet is one big scam
funny how even today PCs can have trouble running this at higher settings because it was designed around clock speed instead of multiple cores. even on my 5950x and 6800 XT at 4k I can't get 60 fps
zWORMz Gaming, man i'm actually feeling Nostalgic watching this.. i was 100% feeling like a Uber Progamer around 2014 when i had 16Gb Ram, 980 Reverence GPU playing Battlefield 3 Maxed out with 60Fps @1080p.. sure that was very high end but only in 2016 i could reach the top of the Olymp with my PC back then... it was a 7700k OC CPU, 16Gb @3200Mghz Ram, Titan Xp full loop 360mm Radiator Water Cooled PC, i playd on a 144Hz Asus Rog Strix monitor i still use Today (it was an absurd State of the Art Monitor back then for like 700€) so for 1 or 2 years i was in the 1% of the most Badass Pc's at the time and that meant something for me.. all i want so say is that i can see how you feel right about now because i was there in the past..
Other youtubers:let's find out,shall we?But first the word from today's sponsor... Kryzzp:let's find out,shall we?But first i gotta show you this we are running it with the latest Nvidia drivers,I am not overclocking it...
Hol up... you ran Crysis at over 70 fps in **4K** max settings... buddy... the _world_ hasn't caught up with 4K. And in fact, when the game was made 4K wasn't even close to being a thing. But anyway, 1080p is the standard right now still, so if you ran Crysis at over 70fps in 4K, you could probably get twice as many fps in 1080p..... which means, it's over... we found the legendary GPU, CPU combo that can run Crysis. The meme can now be put to rest.
Great video for showing off this poorly optimized game. I regretted buying this remaster even on sale. I have RTX 3070 + AMD Ryzen 5900X, so it works fine, but should have ran way better.
Hey nice video! Just wanted to ask if you're using the 12VHPWR adapter cable from Corsair for you Power Supply and GPU. The standard adapter from Nvidia seems pretty bad and I wanted to ask if you have or had any problems?
I was never into Crysis because I just couldnt run it. Recently I got an MSI GS67, its amazing how much you can run on a laptop thses days. I only play at 1440p, I got everything set on High except for textures and water effects, I set " Can it Run Crysis" for these. Runs smooth, but it will take some time until I get the game mechanics right and actually hit some targets :)
"Didn't improve the shooting." What? 1995: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2001: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2007: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2013: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2018: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2022: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. What didn't they improve?
zWORMz out of curiosity what are your 5800x3d settings.... did you tune it with pbotuner or anything else? I see yours jumping to 4550mhz pretty frequently and mine rarely does that :)
About time I installed crysis warhead on a am3 cpu six core with 16 ram and finally with old 2 giga card 6350 It runs on enthusiast on 30 40 fps.... It loos amazing guys
Well. I've played original Crysis on my 8600GT 256mb with 1024p resolution on high settings without problems (~40fps) and when my PC was upgraded in 2010 it was GTX460 1GB - same settings, same framerate but in 720p.
"This ray tracing implementation isnt runningon the RT core" "This ray tracing implementation is path tracing"
It isn't path traced at all. That would basically require an RT accelerator(RT core on RTX cards). Path tracing is basically just total ray tracing, where every bounce of light and possible connotation be it GI, reflections, shadows, AO etc is calculated purely through ray tracing. To date there are only 3 or 4 games that do this.
It was originally a software based ray tracing solution created by Crytek under the SVOGII banner. However, as you had experimental RT boost mode turned on, it does actually use the RT cores fully. If you had that unchecked, it wouldn't be using them
The Can It Run Crysis Preset is so intensive because it removes any level of detail constraints. Everything is rendered at max LOD to the horizon, and shadows etc are drawn also out to the horizon rather than having a certain cut off point.
Oops! I'll pin your comment so people know how it works :)
Thanks for the info mate!
@@zWORMzGaming Sorry if that read like a know-it-all comment man, I read it back and was like "damn that actually sounds like I'm just throwing stuff out there" :)
Good video as always
Can you provide sources for some of this information? Such as "only 4 games have done this to date"? Thanks
@@Kim-fm2vo Currently the only path traced games are Quake 2 RTX , Minecraft, Cyberpunk and Portal although those two arent released yet. Cyberpunks is the new RT Overdrive patch, Portal RTX is announced but unreleased so far.
im out at pub watching football, if you want info its quicker to google it yourself than wait for a reply in future :)
@@Kim-fm2vo There are write-ups on Nvidia's website for most titles that implement any form of hardware ray-tracing. Ammanus is right, there are only 3 or 4 games that use RT for most or all types of both direct and bounce lighting.
2000s were crazy. We got Halo: Combat Evolved in 2001, then Far Cry in 2004 and Crysis in 2007. The graphics progressed so fast within just three years! I remember how GPUs were evolving crazy fast, and became obsolete after one-two years. Nowadays, you could run 2019 game maxed out and its not really different from 2022 game...
We also got GTA 3 and plenty of other games back in 2001
Good old days🥺🥺🥺😢
I think the next graphic step will be gta 6. Nowadays games need much longer to develop than 10 - 20 years ago.
2015 is the plateau
@@sorry7359 what type of reflection is that ( posted from my girlfriend account )
The bigger question since 2022 will be, "Can you afford running 4090's energy costs?" or "Can you survive with 4090 in the room during summer? Challenge!".
This is exactly why the masses will be streaming almost every single game on gfn through steam by 2035
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator most states seem to be 12 cents per kwh, between 12-30. according to overclockers (uk) at 19p per kwh (around 20 cents) playing just one single hour a day on a modest gaming rig will cost £14 ($17) a month, so not much over 2 hrs a day would already take you over 40 dollars. assuming a 4090 uses more energy, it may be more
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator Your calculations are wrong. At 600W peak of the 4090 (just GPU, not the rest of the rig) you are calculating with 12 cents per-hour (since 0.6kw x 20$ kwh), So running 4090 at peak (imagine crypto miner or 24/7 game with unlocked FPS) you are at 86 usd/month.
Secondly US has artificially low energy costs since the governmnet is subsidizing hydrocarbons (even more than solar) and US has no environmental protections burning that stuff. Most of the world has higher energy costs. For example here in EU even inside country mostly powered by nukes we are at ~50 - 60 cents per kwh, effectively doubling that price.
Plus if you wanna play in summer and let the AC running, you need roughly 1,5W of cooling to get rid of 1W of heat (due efficiency losses of ACs). So these GPUs are quickly becoming the most expensive piece of households.
As someone who has two kids plus my own work/play rig, that is a multiplication of all this in household. I am personally very much for governments to step in and do efficiency/power limits on GPUs just like we have efficiency laws for cars as this is getting ridiculous.
@@CyberneticArgumentCreator username checks out
i live in the caribbean where its mostly always 100+ degree all year round, a 4090 heat wont do nothin
Crysis 1 looks so amazing for a game from 2007
yeee
K
@@Xulie 🤓🤓
@@Xulie Objectively incorrect comment 🤓🤓
I still remember how in 2007 Gametrailers (RIP) didnt even nominate Crysis for best graphics that year, because they couldnt get to run it smoothly on their PCs xDD what a joke....
This game was so revolutionary for its time. What I cant beleave is that I remember thinking how good games would get after this and honestly they never made a huge leap from this. Small improvments but we def hit a roof.
Yeah man i used to think back in the days that this game had the best graphics ever but now, seeing how all games looks, there isn't a very big difference!
Yeah you can say that we didn't made a huge jump after Crysis
@@DerHalbeEuro ??? rdr2??
@@aspirewot8408 truly the difference is minimal, if you ran them side by side in fps mode they look the same out in the jungle, in fact, crysis looks better.
@@ignotumperignotius630compare those to avatar though.......say what you want about that game but it is stunningly beautiful.
It can but I would love to see it being done on the ascension mission. This game was developed in an era where MHZ and GHZ were thought to be king instead of cores. Even on a 5ghz cpu that level can drop you down below 60fps. I would imagine if CPU's were 8ghz today then this game would run like a dream.
I mean tbf the first mainstream quad-core cpu, the Q6600 released in Q1 of 2007, so the devs didn't even have the chance to optimize it for more than 2 cores, let alone 8 lol. Not to mention the Q6600 was single-threaded as well on top of that. If only the game released half a decade later, during the bulldozer AMD era of cpus...
We already have 8.8GHz OC's on intel 13th gen so 10GHz looking possible in 1 or 2 generation's
Now it runs over 60+ FPS on android phones, lol
@@dan2800 No, we don't. You are confusing LN2 overclock with boost clocks. 13900K boosts to 5.8GHz on P-cores and AMD Ryzen R9 7950x to 5.7GHz. (That's one core most of the time) We had AMD's FX-8370 that ran at 8722.78 MHz under LN2 in Aug 2014 that got beaten after 8 years by 13900K with 8812.85 MHz. That took some time. Anyways. Having the highest clock speed isn't everything. There are many variables that play a huge role such as IPC and Cache (which is going to be massive with AMD's "new" 3D stacked Cache). So yeah.
@@dan2800 no, even next gen meteor lake cpus are rumored to have lower clocks
Just as a reminder, the top-of-the-line GPU from 2007, a 8800 GTX, had about 681 million transistors, and was supposed to be the top of the line GPU that was going to be able to "run" Crysis in 2007. The RTX 4090 has 78 BILLION transistors, or a cool 114 times more transistors than the 8800 GTX.
wait have 100 more transistors and give you only 50fps more ?
Uhhhh. Even a old Office PC can run crysis.
@@AntiGrieferGames nope my laptop not :/
@@adredyput MSAA on max and try and run it on 8800 GTX. Let me know the result
@@AntiGrieferGamesi hope this is just a joke
I remember playing the original on intel hd 2000 and i3 2120 playing on around 20-30 fps thinking the game looks awesome even on low setting and now being able to play the remaster on very high on 60+ avg fps is just heartwhelming
hardest part is actually getting 4090
@@-bees-5704 -not in my country, we have plenty of stock- nvm apparently they all sold out in 2 days loool
hard part is getting the 4700 bucks it costs lmfaoo
Same i have i3 2120
I get more than 30 on mediium setting thogh it's only 768p but the pont is my laptop can play all pre 2012 or 2013 games perfectly fine except gta 4, that game is just a cpu hog and needs atleast 4 physical cores and my 7200u has only 2
Heartwarming or overwhelming both work but I guess combining them is heart whelming over warming
Actually the mission where everything gets covered with ice because of the aliens is where the gpu really tanks
br0 why are u so damn entertaining i cant stop watching its just video game benchmarks i can watch anyone else but for some reason ur just so fun and different from all the others
This guy is awesome, so much positive vibes
When this game was released people where so happy to get even "playable" 30 - 40fps on high settings @ 1280x720 on a 1500 - 2000€ high end system
Am so happy that you made a video about Crysis 1 (2007) running on RTX 4090 i didn't see any make it, i think you are the first 1, Thank you so much!
I hope you have a good day!
Thanks for watching! Have a great day as well :)
@@zWORMzGaming you are always Welcome mate!
a much appreciated! :)
When you have 16,384 cores, YES YOU FREAKING CAAAAAAN!!!!
Will not take more than 2 decades when we see this number in cpu cores
@@Birdman._. don't need that no of cores.
Data centers: _silently wheezing_
@@NutScrewGamer ARM slightly whispering 😜
The original Crysis was made with the thought that cpu's would just get extremely high frequencies in the future instead of getting more and more cores. Thats why having more than 2 cores actually does not make a difference, only single thread performance matters really.
The physics and graphics of this game are incredible. It’s better than a lot of modern games. It’s extremely demanding at native 4K ultra settings with RT, but the 4090 gets over a stable 60 FPS with ease. What a monster this GPU is.
At the price it better be
@@Xulie MW2 looks better tho
I have an RTX 4090 and not getting anywhere near the frame rates this guy is getting. And I have a better processor too.
@@MousePotato Then something is wrong with your PC. I have checked out multiple different CZcamsrs who have tested the 4090 at native 4K max settings with RT in this game and they get similar FPS to zWORMz.
@@Gamer-q7v It just came back from being serviced with this new card inserted.
Damn that's crazy. $2000 GPU and it still can't run over 60.
$1,600
crazy..
OMG I didn't know You can pickup that chicken-like animal. Awesome. This game still rocks!
Fun fact:he still hasn't tested medium settings on the 4090 on any game
btw keep up the great work
This game has been out for 15 years before a GPU powerful enough to run it came out. What a time to be alive. 😅
“Who’s gonna keep you warm”
The PS4 when you switch to max graphics so that it can run crysis sounded like Chernobyl explosion. It makes you warm. Mentally and physically💀💀💀
Remember getting pretty solid frames on this back with my Q6600 and 9800 GTX+ I believe I had back then. Maybe not on all Very High or selective but it was playable for sure. Now I didn't have FPS counters at the time but I'm sure it was probably in the 20s or 30s (certainly not 60 FPS+). It's neat to see how far things have come but at the same time remembering that Crysis 1 was heavily unoptimized by today's standards as well.
Nice video down memory lane!
I can't actually believe I'm still watching "...but will it run Crysis..." reviews xD
when I get some money im going to join your channel. I have watched like 40 of your videos and they always answer my questions and your very kind and smart and i love your sense of humor. i hope all is well and look forward to your future videos thanks again
Watching your every videos from Bangladesh 🇧🇩 💙💙
2.20 Lakh for RTX 4090 🥴
Yep this game was a beast in it's day and still is now, My first build that could run it was not until 2009, and that was low settings.
Me to my Intel HD Graphics 2500 from i3 3210 from 2012 :
Can you run Crysis ?
My PC : Oh god, spare me, please ? I don't have much time. * Coughs (x2) *
rip
It's a great disappointment that modern games these days don't support cutting down tree or breaking various objects, while Crysis did it a long time ago.
Cyberbug 2077 has worse physics than Half Life 2 and was launched in 2004 lmao. Half Life 2 was very intensive too.
@@saricubra2867 And it's performance is awful as hell. No wonder it's called CyberBug.
I remember in 2007 thinking wow I wonder how games will look in 10 plus years but it seems alot of today's games have gone backwards with graphics and in game physics..
0:41 "8 Times MSAA Anti Aliasing" XD I love it how you double it every time XD....I love you for that!!!!
ahahaha yeah, damn it xD
amazing video am pretty impressed with crysis 2007 graphics it has amazing details and stuff other games dosent in 2022
yo i saw someone recommend this video idea in the comments of a recent video, and im so happy you did it!
In 2022 raytracing is just not necessary. All it does is add a few shiny bits here and there, reflections become mirrors instead of diffuse and adds a couple of variations in shadows and that's about it. Hardly something you are going to notice when playing a game. And Nvidia wants to charge you double what their cards are worth for that....
If I remember correctly, there are some settings in the original Crysis that you can set to "Ultra high" quality, but you need to do it manually instead of just picking the very high preset. So you were probably not using the actual max settings in these benchmarks! *edit* I think it was the water setting that has an ultra option.
That was in the times when some of us could only run it in DX9 (high) but originally, the game was MUCH more advanced with a higher quality lighting and textures
r. of polygons but it was reduced to what we got in 2007.
8800gt and e8400 cpu was my budget build for this game as a teenager.
Fun fact this game works better in ultrawide than a fair few games of this decade.. The only odd thing about it is cutscenes are developed for 16:9 so when you end up seeing stuff off screen that your not supposed to and it can be pretty funny. OG crysis is a beast.. Multiplayer was a bit strange to get into but yeah good game. Great test of cpu single thread performance alter in the game with all the tanks and vtol vehicle things happening freezing and shit.. I remember trying to run it at 1920x1200 on a gtx480 and amd phenom II X4 945 processor.. my fps was owwie. This game is proof that in the older days they really did try to do the next level stuff with games rather than just the usual unreal engine with shiny glossy bollocks going on and some average wack ass gameplay
True that. Back in the early 2000s with the way thing were going, I thought we were going to have pixar quality games by 2020 lol
The question should be: Will rtx4090 be able to run Crysis without melting itself...
I wonder what's the status of Crysis 4? Can you imagine the meme: "will it run Crysis" on a 13900K, 4090, ddr5 LOL Let's hope so
17 years later and crysis still beating up pc's lol
I can barely break the 100-110fps barrier on my i7-12700K with the physics and AI maxed out.
I always get rekt by the enemy AI for max difficulty.
After crysis I couldn't go back to consoles. I find them really interesting and keep up to date with them, even admit that a series X is more powerful than my pc, but stil, something clicked back then.
1:45 bending vegetation in CoD MW2 2022 14 years later they still do not have this feature.
finial boss for a gpu
Can you test Crysis 1 with mod "Crysis Enhanced Edition" + "Optional 4K/8K textures pack" + "Ultra autoexec.cfg" at 4K with MSAA 8x and star the game go to the first beach please?
7:40 LOOOL. I finished this game like 30 times. Playing since 2008 and I never khew that!
I mean, Crysis isn't really demanding in terms of GPU power, but rather CPU. Anyone can "run" Crysis. The question is, can you run it well. I'd wager the higher FPS here is due to the CPU, and it basically being "vanilla" Crysis. Most people these days mod it with HD textures and have new graphics and settings enabled that aren't in the original (SSR, higher LOD, Real time reflections, SSAO, Global illumination, better shadows, volumetric clouds, better vegetation quality and density, and better anti-aliasing etc.)
Naturally, all these new or better settings become much more demanding. I've always gotten Crysis to run at 60+ FPS before with merely an i5 6400 and an RTX 2060 Super. My new PC, with an i5 10400, RTX 3060 Ti, and 16 GB of RAM struggles to keep the FPS above 40 or 50 because the game uses the new "Crysis Enhanced Edition" mod. Maybe I would get higher FPS with a 4090, but Crysis is more demanding on the CPU, and it would be my CPU that's currently the bottleneck as opposed to the GPU. Crysis only uses 2 cores. So a CPU like the author of this video is using is more powerful because it's an 8 core/16 thread processor with a base clock of 3.4 and 4.5 max boost clock. And Crysis always benefits from much higher clocks than more cores.
Ohh. The good old and timeless CPU bottleneck with one thread for the 2007 version.
Can you make some benchmarks with the rtx 3060 mobile?
Yeah coming next :)
The game was so intensive that 8600GT which was your average gamer card would struggle to run the game
they're all in on it - constantly making games more cpu and gpu demanding so people keep upgrading or buying new stuff
otherwise those industries would pretty much fail if people could use a computer from 5-10 years ago to keep playing new titles and never have to buy something new
they milked it for years with CD-ROM drives, the research and development people knew 52x speed was a safe limit to prevent CD's from exploding , and so they released the 1x speed CD ROM drives, then 2x, 4x, etc etc made money off people as long as possible, then release the dvd discs and so on
the whole damn planet is one big scam
you gotta test different CPUs with this game to see if they can max out a 4090 at 4k 💀
crysis 1, 2,3 , ryse son of rome rdr2 and many games are faaar ahead of it's time, have played 3 of them and all are awesome
funny how even today PCs can have trouble running this at higher settings because it was designed around clock speed instead of multiple cores. even on my 5950x and 6800 XT at 4k I can't get 60 fps
Legit question. Why do you need anti aliasing at 4k?
You should actually try the Crysis Enhanced mod version. All textures are 2k/4k and looks way better than the "Remaster" version
You Should make a series on testing all the esports on different gpus
Yeah I have it in my to do list :)
I ran this on a build with a core 2 duo, 8 gigs of ram, and an EVGA GTX 8800 Ultra that I built in 2007
Nothing can run Crysis. It's the ultimate barrier in technology for humanity.
zWORMz Gaming, man i'm actually feeling Nostalgic watching this.. i was 100% feeling like a Uber Progamer around 2014 when i had 16Gb Ram, 980 Reverence GPU playing Battlefield 3 Maxed out with 60Fps @1080p.. sure that was very high end but only in 2016 i could reach the top of the Olymp with my PC back then... it was a 7700k OC CPU, 16Gb @3200Mghz Ram, Titan Xp full loop 360mm Radiator Water Cooled PC, i playd on a 144Hz Asus Rog Strix monitor i still use Today (it was an absurd State of the Art Monitor back then for like 700€) so for 1 or 2 years i was in the 1% of the most Badass Pc's at the time and that meant something for me.. all i want so say is that i can see how you feel right about now because i was there in the past..
Other youtubers:let's find out,shall we?But first the word from today's sponsor...
Kryzzp:let's find out,shall we?But first i gotta show you this we are running it with the latest Nvidia drivers,I am not overclocking it...
I know you are from Portugal 🇵🇹 Love you bro🤩💙💙💙🇧🇩
Nice video mate , please do some uncharted 4 and lost legacy benchmarks , waiting for it for soo long
This games looks amazing! and its a 15 year old game
Yeah, it's crazy!
the color grading in crysis 1 is so much better than the remastered version
Still the best open world shooters to date.
Crysis is my favorite game of all time. I really hope they dont mess up Crysis 4.
Alleine das Umknicken der Palmen. Welches Spiel hat diese Physik noch....?, ich kenne keines XD
We're basically back to square one in 2007, Can It Run Crysis???
0:24 It must have been really difficult to prevent saying "Shall we?" after "Lets get into it", as u said it before 😂😂
Man the OG game still looks good it was tears ahead
It literally took four years until Battlefield 3 came out for it to be beaten. Such an achievement hasn't been reproduced since I think.
Crazy that fallout new vegas came out 3 years after this and looks like it game out 3 years before
Hol up... you ran Crysis at over 70 fps in **4K** max settings... buddy... the _world_ hasn't caught up with 4K. And in fact, when the game was made 4K wasn't even close to being a thing. But anyway, 1080p is the standard right now still, so if you ran Crysis at over 70fps in 4K, you could probably get twice as many fps in 1080p..... which means, it's over... we found the legendary GPU, CPU combo that can run Crysis. The meme can now be put to rest.
Great video for showing off this poorly optimized game. I regretted buying this remaster even on sale. I have RTX 3070 + AMD Ryzen 5900X, so it works fine, but should have ran way better.
Hey nice video! Just wanted to ask if you're using the 12VHPWR adapter cable from Corsair for you Power Supply and GPU. The standard adapter from Nvidia seems pretty bad and I wanted to ask if you have or had any problems?
Hi! Thanks :)
I am using it, haven't had any issues. It doesn't get too hot either, at least to the touch!
@@zWORMzGaming Cool thanks! Love to hear that.
-Can it run Crysis?
.
.
.
-YES
4090 be like minimum requirement when crysis 4 comes out lol
Far Cry
Crysis
Doom 3
Those were the days.
Next time try Crysis 3 as well, it also has a remastered version now.
Ah yes the scientist finally did it.
Thanks buddy.
one of the very best old school fps games but its optimization is ....
The optimization Is bad? Looks like a 2022 title, why complain?
I was never into Crysis because I just couldnt run it. Recently I got an MSI GS67, its amazing how much you can run on a laptop thses days. I only play at 1440p, I got everything set on High except for textures and water effects, I set " Can it Run Crysis" for these. Runs smooth, but it will take some time until I get the game mechanics right and actually hit some targets :)
Remember playing this game with Sli 760s which was faster then the Titan still couldn’t play this
"Didn't improve the shooting." What? 1995: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2001: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2007: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2013: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2018: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. 2022: Put crosshair on target. Press mouse button. What didn't they improve?
Finally we’re asking the important questions!
In the beginning you where not out of bullets, you have selected the tranquilizer darts wich take some time to reload xD
this game favours a fast single core, when we get a CPU clocked at 6GHz it'll melt this game like butter.
the new thing is:
B) Can it run Raytraced Minecraft?
My PC cannot even run CZcams video at 4K without dropping frames, and here am I sitting and judging RTX4090's 8K performance...
Asking the real questions here!
Bro i play this on GTX 970 and its still super. This is a fantastic graphic games. The tropical look and sun rays are really super.
zWORMz out of curiosity what are your 5800x3d settings.... did you tune it with pbotuner or anything else?
I see yours jumping to 4550mhz pretty frequently and mine rarely does that :)
About time I installed crysis warhead on a am3 cpu six core with 16 ram and finally with old 2 giga card 6350 It runs on enthusiast on 30 40 fps.... It loos amazing guys
I remember when I was buying my pc from someone else the game I tested on the pc was crysis. I was like it runs crysis so I am buying it :D
How was your 4090? Everyone's in chaos because of melting 4090s.
Well. I've played original Crysis on my 8600GT 256mb with 1024p resolution on high settings without problems (~40fps) and when my PC was upgraded in 2010 it was GTX460 1GB - same settings, same framerate but in 720p.
somehow kryzzp's power connector hasn't melted yet
Yeah it's fine 😅
First person to comment on the video with a weird glitch on youtube
finally we can run this game decently but for that you need the most powerful gpu of the time XD
The hardware monitoring visuals in the top left, is that done through MSI Afterburner or some other software?
Reshade brings the world to life tho......
always worth trying out on older games !
Ah, but can it run Crysis on max settings for 24 hours straight without melting your cable, that's the real question.
Let's find out shall we
On the desktop it uses GPU 100% Version 526.47 Hardware-accelerated GPU scheduling Turn it off fixed it Graphics settings