Sri Ramana Maharshi - How to practice SELF- INQUIRY narrated by David Godman

Sdílet
Vložit

Komentáře • 9

  • @esneliamunoz4475
    @esneliamunoz4475 Před 2 lety

    🕉🕉🕉🙏

  • @zied8217
    @zied8217 Před 5 lety +1

    Merci beaucoup Henry. Merci infiniment

  • @blueskythinking8312
    @blueskythinking8312 Před 6 lety +1

    This clears up so many things for me. Thank you so much!

  • @blueskythinking8312
    @blueskythinking8312 Před 6 lety +3

    Thank you Henri for ur kindness and thank you David Godman

  • @kenjones382
    @kenjones382 Před 5 lety

    This is dead on. AFTER Self-realization, the place to the right of the chest becomes apparent as the situation in the subtle body that one notices the interface with the physical body as the entry or resting place of the little I, but the Self is not the physical body!

  • @divinebrightlight
    @divinebrightlight  Před 6 lety

    czcams.com/video/TEWsy0mEg3g/video.html May you also listen to this video and learn among other teachings of Sri ramana Maharshi ....That he said to Paramahansa Yogananda in 1935 ..."THAT THERE ARE MANY PATHS TO SELF REALISAZION"

  • @PhoenixProdLLC
    @PhoenixProdLLC Před 5 lety

    Did you graduate medical school? IOW, are you a PhD in Psychiatry?
    Also, pardon me, but it is not necessary to have a religion in order to practice "self inquiry". One may be atheist, agnostic, ignostic, pagan etc.
    I think Eastern philosophy is interesting, however I think only in context of the other philosophies on the globe or in human history. Nor do I see it as remotely superior to Western/classic Greek philosophy such as Platonic philosophy, or the Stoics (my least fave), nor Enlightenment philosophers, nor modern such as Sartre or Camus (my fave 😁), nor Hegel etc. I'm not a fan of Nietschze as he was, imo, not a good enough writer to avoid misinterpretation even in his native tongue (which is perhaps how a Hitler could name him as a primary influence, though little Adolph was probably doing so just to impress and embellish his own intellectual pursuit, which I'd suggest was almost nil).
    IMO, one of THE greatest "yogis" that's appeared in the last 200 year's is Carl Jung. Combined with Feynman, it's quite a one-two knockout punch to probably 99% of the proclaimers/repeaters *anywhere on the planet* ever since. ;)
    It can be enormously difficult, however, to get even bright minds to understand the important distinction between Logic and the Perception of Logic. The Eastern philosophers in this respect are very weak. It's very difficult to get even the few of their best gurus to deal with. It will illuminate, as rapidly and intensely as the Sun suddenly unshielded to the deepest black, how deep in Plato's cave they remain, and how attached to its shadows and their own chains. The love of perception above prevents perception of their chains. It's delightfully ironic 😂 Though it, understandably, can take a bit off time before they can laugh at their own predicament: "I'm an enlightenment guru, changed up in Plato's cave, babbling about a free and clarified mind!" 😂😂
    Finally, the gentleman suggests "having faith..." that this teacher "knows what's best for you...". Um, no.
    Please allow *this* Jedi to help you out: Abandon ALL Faith, Ye who enter Herein.
    I do not need nor want your faith and would advise you sincerely to avoid all "signpost/pointers" who tell you: Assert ALL your Faith, Ye who enter Herein.
    More facetiously put, for cheeriness sake:
    A ban d-on All Fait, hye whont erhe rein! 😂😂 (the point being all phases may be misconstrued, merely because the writer gets lazy over the course of a few words, and then an entirely new or different meaning/idea is picked up, repeated and repeated and repeated....when the Thinker meant nothing of the kind! 😂😂)
    Faith?
    Non, mon frere, non.

  • @JulianK55
    @JulianK55 Před 19 dny

    You don’t

  • @esneliamunoz4475
    @esneliamunoz4475 Před 2 lety

    🕉🕉🕉🙏