It all comes down to wether the society is a just society and where our morality stands, if the society is just then it will be good if not it will be a dystopic society
There are many confounding variables in determining a social voting demographic just based on education. Individuals with lower education levels did not recover jobs in the same proportion as those of higher educated some of this is related to opportunities where people live as well .
do AI and technologists, computer scientists give a crap where AI drives us? No of course not. They are themselves apathetic or willing or hapless tools -they just want a job. They dont care or take responsibility for what the result of their efforts is. They do not accept responsibility for what they are doing: empowering Amazon or NSA. AI at the worker, bottom feeder level is just a job. At the top manager and owner level, its not just about money: it mostly ego power. Both Owners and Slaves wouldnt stop what they are doing [but they will go to hear Sachs talk]. if AI destroys jobs and produces discontent while enriching its corporate geek owners no one will speak up or raise a hand if it risks their job. AI is patently a dystopian. Its an ego driven [selfish] dystopian culture that Sachs knows is destructive. AI is not sustainable. It obviously demands regulation and limits, but it is not regulated because, as Dylan said, "the pump dont work cause the vandals stole the handles".
My guess is that people will be paid according to their education/skill level regardless of weather they apply them since AI machines will make high level skill / knowledge unnecessary in most cases. People will be paid to be cultural learners as a occupation.
I really like Jeff Sachs and agree with most of what he is saying but something tells me that a few of the opinions expressed in this video will not age well......at all.
There is a hidden issue for me and that is if we solve inequality then demand will sky rocked which will lead to in a automated society a commodity explosion and massive impact on the environment..from resource depletion and production pollution..etc. Since automation and inequality will be addressed though slowly if best put our efforts on protecting the environment else we will have a scenario similar to the AI that fills the world with paper clips but instead with commodity.
It all comes down to wether the society is a just society and where our morality stands, if the society is just then it will be good if not it will be a dystopic society
I suspect you are underestimating the number of different, but well-meaning definitions there are of that gigantic word, "just."
There are many confounding variables in determining a social voting demographic just based on education. Individuals with lower education levels did not recover jobs in the same proportion as those of higher educated some of this is related to opportunities where people live as well .
Block chain for internet voting....yes
do AI and technologists, computer scientists give a crap where AI drives us? No of course not. They are themselves apathetic or willing or hapless tools -they just want a job. They dont care or take responsibility for what the result of their efforts is. They do not accept responsibility for what they are doing: empowering Amazon or NSA. AI at the worker, bottom feeder level is just a job.
At the top manager and owner level, its not just about money: it mostly ego power.
Both Owners and Slaves wouldnt stop what they are doing [but they will go to hear Sachs talk]. if AI destroys jobs and produces discontent while enriching its corporate geek owners no one will speak up or raise a hand if it risks their job.
AI is patently a dystopian. Its an ego driven [selfish] dystopian culture that Sachs knows is destructive. AI is not sustainable. It obviously demands regulation and limits, but it is not regulated because, as Dylan said, "the pump dont work cause the vandals stole the handles".
My guess is that people will be paid according to their education/skill level regardless of weather they apply them since AI machines will make high level skill / knowledge unnecessary in most cases. People will be paid to be cultural learners as a occupation.
I really like Jeff Sachs and agree with most of what he is saying but something tells me that a few of the opinions expressed in this video will not age well......at all.
There is a hidden issue for me and that is if we solve inequality then demand will sky rocked which will lead to in a automated society a commodity explosion and massive impact on the environment..from resource depletion and production pollution..etc. Since automation and inequality will be addressed though slowly if best put our efforts on protecting the environment else we will have a scenario similar to the AI that fills the world with paper clips but instead with commodity.
Sorry but TDS has very little to do with AI. I would say Mr Sachs has more than a few blind spots for such a smart guy.
sorry didn't mean to poach your "pretty good" just didn't know if she could spare a spade one two BelWall
pretty good but more of a stand by your pan 390 . but I only suspect