Article 1 | National Territory | Civil Service Exam Reviewer

This video has 10-item questions on Article 1 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution entitled "NATIONAL TERRITORY".
1987 Philippine Constitution is a part of General Information in Career Service Examination - Pen and Paper Test.
Follow our Facebook Page: / nomostud
Article II: • Article 2 | Declaratio...
NoMo Studio Performance Survey: forms.office.com/r/Jiwkz5t0sH

[@richardjenzentayag1827]

Thank you Sir sa pag shared ng idea para po sa civil service exam. with explanation pa po. sana marami ka pa po ma i download para sa maraming tao na mag rereview. God bless po.

[@melcapinote2699]

hi, sir. thank you for this video. it is very informative and useful to all the aspirants CSE takers this coming March 26, 2023 thanks a lot. po 🤗💖🙏😇

[@nomostud]

All the best

[@arnelramos6998]

Maraming Salamat po sayo Nomo Studio. Silent viewer mo po ko. Gusto ko lang magpasalamat po. Laking tulong po ng mga tutorial videos nyo. Dahil po dyan nakapasa ko sa CSE Prof level. 1st taker. God bless you po 🥰

[@nomostud]

By the way, Congrats po...👏👏

[@chinchanso2189]

Thanks a lot sir, mas malinaw at mas mbilis maintindhan, dagdag kaalaman nrin sa mga explanation ng bawat answer..

[@jericraven244]

Almost 100k followers ka na sir! Thank you sa lahat ng learnings

[@DivinaMangilaya]

Thank you for all the knowledge you shared ❤

[@mathildaaglolos209]

Bless day sir,have a nice day a head sir,very clear and understandable explanation sir,thanks so much for this kind of review and I really enjoyed it watching and listening sir,I hope and pray that this reviewer will appear on the day during our examination on August 20 ,2023,thanks and God bless you Po sir

[@OrdinaryFilms-xf6gc]

Thank you po sir,dami Kong natutunan sa Inyo😊
More power❤️

[@jennypilayo9210]

Thank you sir and for notifying me as well.😊❤

[@Aslo-ih2zs]

Thank you for this kind of reviewer indeed it is very helpful for me. I got 7/10 makahappy lang kasi nakakagana mag aral at mag review lalo na clear yung pagkaka explain. Thank you so much NoMo Studio for this💚🎉

[@aldrindionesio1869]

Thank you fpr the informations sir, plus points yong explanation nyo.
God. Bless you po❤

[@ritchelradaza1124]

I like this video. Very informative

[@ShielamarieAustria-oi9dl]

Thank you so much ❤️❤️❤️. Clean in detail. Understanding the review.❤️❤️❤️

[@melissaflores-rd5cm]

Thank u so much for the clear explanations.

[@mohaimenarba9308]

Thank you ❤❤❤❤ galing niyo po

[@arwinsilvino05]

very informative! Got 8/10 Thank you.

[@Mrkronos1122]

thank you po sir. God Bless po 😇💙

[@domlara7]

3days review sir, sayo ako nanonood🙏🙏🙏 salamat sir napaka linaw❤

[@anabellepadernal3011]

Thank u sir ..for the information

[@catherineg.detalo5873]

Really informative po. I really enjoy this kind of review kasi mas transparent ang explanation. Thank you po 🤗

[@nomostud]

You're welcome 😊

[@bebzdalis5230]

thank u po...god bless🙏

[@jvlogznonoy1599]

Thank you po sir. 💖🙏

[@JuvyLoveLacre05081987]

Thank you po..! 👍

[@jie-anp.channel3411]

Thank you po sa info❤️

[@CSEPRCReviewCenterph]

Thank you po sir sa very easy to understand video. It really hepls. 😊

[@jermybriones7810]

7/10 , thank you sir. Hoping to pass the exam ❤️💪

[@melissacanillas8615]

Thank you po sir ❤

[@josephinebandigan2132]

Thank you so much sir..god bless❤❤

[@jennylynbalansag3941]

Thank you sir💗

[@paulinbitangcor365]

Thank you po Sir

[@ethankylepascua6519]

Thanks po sir!

[@emilydulpina9346]

Thank you 🙏😍

[@omougraceata5123]

Thank you Po sir☺️

[@liagandangan3023]

Thanks 🙏🙏

[@user-fj3nw4qc1w]

thank you so much sir

[@almomitsampulna8985]

Never ko pa ata nabasa mga queations salamat sir

[@kentjosephlabiano5055]

Thank you sir sana makapasa this august 20

[@joeysanto6286]

Thanks po Idol

[@jenemarsalon2130]

maraming salamat sir sana makapasa praying po

[@nomostud]

Kayang-kaya yan sir...💪

[@irenemandipol1805]

Thank youuuu sir ❤❤❤❤❤

[@nomostud]

Welcome!

[@jenelynmondano8961]

❤❤❤

[@fharrrii]

is this really included in every cse exam po? yung sa general information?

[@michellevalle8489]

Hello sir may soft copy po ba kayo csc reviewer?

[@ralphkennethreyes5433]

NEW SUBS HERE🎉🎉
ASK KO LANG, LUMALABAS DIN BA TO SA QUALIFYING EXAM SA BUCOR?? THANKYOU S RESPONSE

[@nomostud]

1987 Philippine Constitution is a part of BuCor Qualifying Exam under General Info

[@edvenbibvenus7966]

Pray for me this coming August 20, 2023

[@mathildaaglolos209]

But sir may I have only to ask you back to question number 6,kc 3 Ang right answer,sir what is our best choice is it letter a.b or c? Thanks sir

[@erueru6101]

Question lang po regarding sa question #10. If Article 2, Section 8 of PH Constitution prohibits presence of nuclear weapons in the country, what about using nuclear as a nonrenewable source of energy? Thank you sa makakasagot

[@BIeed69]

Wag kana umasa bulok ang pinas

[@nomostud]

Anyway okay naman sya so long it is carefully managed. But meron din po kasing certain risks and potential dangers kasi, syimpre primarily nagrerelease yan ng high levels of radiation. Our government should take a look at it deeply, para magamit at ma managed ng maayos, Pinagbawal kasi yan, Remember the 1987 Constitution was in effect at the time of late Pres C.C.Aquino. in which ayaw niya ng nuclear power plant, para hindi maalala ng mga Pilipino si Marcos.

[@MiLRO.]

Malaki ang kaibahan ng nuclear weapon sa nuclear energy. Nuclear weapon(atomic bombs) gamit lang iyan mainly sa pakikipag digma, kagaya ng ginawa ng U.S. binomba nila ang hiroshima at nagasaki noong aug.6-9 1945. While ang nuclear energy ay ang paghihiwalay ng atom at mag gegenerate ng heat para paikot sa mga turbine at mag generate ng dagitab (elektrisidad).
Protekto 'yun ni PFEM para makapagbigay daw ng sapat na elektrisidad para sa Pilipinas at sa abot kayang halaga, kaya lang 'yun nga sinara ng mga Acquino. Kaya maraming electric company dito sa Pilipinas at ang mahal ng singil nila sa kuryente.
May mga pros & cons talaga ang pagkakaroon ng nuclear power plant o pag gamit ng nuclear energy, pero hayaan na natin ang mga eksperto patungkol sa mga bagay na iyan. At tingnan niyo ang mga mauunlad na bansa halos lahat ng mga bansang iyon may nuclear power plant.

[@hopelope1703]

Sulu/PH need to resolve 2 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia.
Firstly, Sulu need to show undisputable proof that earlier, Brunei Sultanate (original owner) give North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in the Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of 29/12/1877 agreement (consist of 4 agreements) signed by Brunei Sultanate that grant the whole of North Borneo to British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and keep in the National Archives in London. The word “grant” been used, and it has never been challenged or protest by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946) and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia.
Secondly, let assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish its territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and US relinquish North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. At the end, Sulu has nothing.
Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay.

[@MrBlu3]

sa panahon ngayon yung 1987 constitution yung ibang article irrelevant na like Nuclear Weapon treaty...

[@nomostud]

That is why kailangan na po ng Constitutional Convention.

[@MrBlu3]

@@nomostud dpt lng sir

[@marianjaneunabia8088]

Babalikan ko to if papasa at lalabas ito sa exam ko this cominng August 20

[@hopelope1703]

There is a court case record in ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) pertaining to the Philippines claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. During the trial, Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply to Article 62 of the Statute of Court, Philippines stated 3 objects for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely to safeguard and preserve Philippines historical and legal rights over North Borneo, to inform the court the affect or effect of the court outcomes on its claim to the territories and on the procedural issues in the court. Philippines lawyers explained their case and provided documentation especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83).
On 23 October 2001, by 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippines request on the ground that there is no interest of legal nature (Section 93).
Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001

[@OrdinaryFilms-xf6gc]

Thank you po sir,dami Kong natutunan sa Inyo😊
More power❤️

[@RhearenQuino]

Thank you sir

[@alvintambalihol-il8li]

Thank you sir for this video it is very informative and it is very clear explanation..