True! Had the same thought. He’s using around a one half diffusion and a grid. Removing the grid and using a thinner diffusion would help a lot. One thing I’m purchasing at grid nets to setup over windows. They work as film on the window and you can really controle outdoor light sources
It’s absolutely refreshing to see you share your limitations with your jobs especially with something like lighting. Looking forward to seeing a future video episode of when you replace the 200x
In hindsight, that grid definitely sucked up some output. That window is no joke and still would have been hard to compete with 200w. Thanks for sharing!
I hear you on the 200x not fitting the bill all the time! Might be worth considering carrying a few, along with a 4x4 or 6x6 collapsable diff frame, an alternate way to have a bigger output source if the 600 is too bulky to bring.
Also, it looks like you ran the light dome with the grid, you could squeeze a little more output from the light without the grid especially with that backdrop where spill isn't much of an issue.
I find the 200x is just not enough to go through a softbox unless you get it really close. I've got a pair of them and I've definitely found their limitations. I'm actually looking at the new GVM Pro SD650B that just came out. They seem like a heck of a light for the money.
@@AlbertoMendoza I think I saw a used one on bh for $600. It's a beefy light (15# head) would likely need a c-stand. I ended up going with the 500b instead.
No substitute for high output. I’m in the same boat. Looking at 300x but it’s only a marginal increase; which leaves the 600x as my next option. And that thing is bulky. Definitely would need more room in the cart.
How much brighter is the 200d than the 200x in reality? Barely noticeable difference? Maybe 2 200d together, but at that point maybe a single 300d might be worth the extra cost for simplicity?
You could've brought the softbox much closer to the talent. Bring it as close as you can without it appearing in frame. that way you'll maximize the power while having the mostsoftness too. The light i'd say was still a bit harsh here
There are many steps to consider before you call out your light being not strong enough. You can always move closer your light source. Play with your softbox and the diffusers. Try to create a book light with it. Try to bounce it. Also if you replaced it I am curious what light was your option to go with. Great content though, keep it up! :)
Dear, the light is too far from the interviewee. Look at the frame on the camera, and the distance you positioned the light from your client. You need to bring it closer. Sure, you're right about the output of your Amaran 200x, but on the other hand, you should indeed have positioned the lighting closer to each interviewee. Just subscribed. Great content.
Just go with amaran 300c all perfect and in this case on your video you just need ND filter to cut the highlight and push the 200x in my opinion but I don’t know how bright the 200x
With all due respect, you need to invest in studying first rather than in gear. It's going to save you a lot of money. Using the grid and putting the light that far away from the subject only tell us that you randomly put them there without thinking or measuring. I know things can get nervous, rushed or stressed, but always take your time to think about what you are doing. However, you are only going to find a solution IF you have a solid understanding of the basics.
Maybe just remove the Grid and get closer?
True! Had the same thought. He’s using around a one half diffusion and a grid. Removing the grid and using a thinner diffusion would help a lot. One thing I’m purchasing at grid nets to setup over windows. They work as film on the window and you can really controle outdoor light sources
This would be my first steps! If not just save for the 600D
It’s absolutely refreshing to see you share your limitations with your jobs especially with something like lighting.
Looking forward to seeing a future video episode of when you replace the 200x
Thanks a lot Toyin!
In hindsight, that grid definitely sucked up some output. That window is no joke and still would have been hard to compete with 200w. Thanks for sharing!
great vid snappy and insightful thanks
I hear you on the 200x not fitting the bill all the time! Might be worth considering carrying a few, along with a 4x4 or 6x6 collapsable diff frame, an alternate way to have a bigger output source if the 600 is too bulky to bring.
Also, it looks like you ran the light dome with the grid, you could squeeze a little more output from the light without the grid especially with that backdrop where spill isn't much of an issue.
I find the 200x is just not enough to go through a softbox unless you get it really close. I've got a pair of them and I've definitely found their limitations. I'm actually looking at the new GVM Pro SD650B that just came out. They seem like a heck of a light for the money.
I’ll have to look into that 👀
@@AlbertoMendoza I think I saw a used one on bh for $600. It's a beefy light (15# head) would likely need a c-stand. I ended up going with the 500b instead.
200x woulda been fine with a few small windows. Giant glass office windows, you really need 300w minimum.
The grid was redundant because so much light spilled in from the window.
No substitute for high output. I’m in the same boat. Looking at 300x but it’s only a marginal increase; which leaves the 600x as my next option. And that thing is bulky. Definitely would need more room in the cart.
👀 going to look into those two lights.
How much brighter is the 200d than the 200x in reality? Barely noticeable difference? Maybe 2 200d together, but at that point maybe a single 300d might be worth the extra cost for simplicity?
Maybe the 200d was the better tool for this?
You need a fill light.
You could've brought the softbox much closer to the talent. Bring it as close as you can without it appearing in frame. that way you'll maximize the power while having the mostsoftness too. The light i'd say was still a bit harsh here
Ahhh good to know! thanks!
There are many steps to consider before you call out your light being not strong enough. You can always move closer your light source. Play with your softbox and the diffusers. Try to create a book light with it. Try to bounce it. Also if you replaced it I am curious what light was your option to go with. Great content though, keep it up! :)
I’m always trying to learn. Appreciate the tips!
Question, could you have placed the light closer to them?
Dear, the light is too far from the interviewee. Look at the frame on the camera, and the distance you positioned the light from your client. You need to bring it closer. Sure, you're right about the output of your Amaran 200x, but on the other hand, you should indeed have positioned the lighting closer to each interviewee. Just subscribed. Great content.
Just go with amaran 300c all perfect and in this case on your video you just need ND filter to cut the highlight and push the 200x in my opinion but I don’t know how bright the 200x
I used Amaran 300c (recent vlog) and I like it!
👍🏼
With all due respect, you need to invest in studying first rather than in gear. It's going to save you a lot of money. Using the grid and putting the light that far away from the subject only tell us that you randomly put them there without thinking or measuring. I know things can get nervous, rushed or stressed, but always take your time to think about what you are doing. However, you are only going to find a solution IF you have a solid understanding of the basics.
get the Godox knowled 600bi
Dude how do you land these jobs, I mean Click Up is a pretty known company
I explain how I got my foot in the door on episode 2