I found that the 2023 Rossignol Experience 80 carbon skis that I purchased through REI and tuned were stable, tracked well, and fast on the groomed and light powder runs at Breckenridge early March. Always felt in control in all conditions that I encountered in bowls and groomed runs. I could keep up with my 25 year daughter who does not ever find the need to carve or slow down.
I have the last years model and started to get pretty good on it. would say im an upper intermediate really starting to do some advanced skiing. will this ski greatly hold me back? in other words do i need to look into purchasing a more advanced ski or will these still serve me well until they really need to be replaced.
You are always more than welcome to buy new skis, but if the Experience 80 is still working for you, I see no reason to go out of your zone. If you want something similar but better, you can stay in the Experience range up to 86 Ti, which is a high-end premium ski. The 82 Basalt is the next step up from where you're at if you're interested.
Bob/Team, Looking at this ski but 78C version compared to the K2 Disruption 78C. What is the better option of the two for a beginner level skier for strictly groomed and carving? Just subscribed, love the channel.
Thanks, John! For a true beginner, I think the Rossignol is a better choice, from ease of use to budget standpoints. The K2's benefit is that it'll grow a bit with you, but other than that, I'd think the Rossignol is still a better option.
Hi, I am 167 cm and 16 years old. I’m an intermediate skier and recently purchased these in 158 cm. I am still debating whether to get the 166 or keep the 158 cm. I think I will grow quickly out of them, but in the same time 166 seems to difficult to control…
Hi Bob! I'm very new to skiing (snowboarded for the past 20 years) and looking to purchase my first pair of skis to skip the rental lines. Just need something to cruise groomers with my little kids who don't go very fast but wouldn't mind something that allows me to learn on my own to get to an intermediate level eventually. I can either get these 80C's or the Basalt 82 for the same price currently. Which would you recommend? Would the 82 Basalt be too much ski for a true beginner? Thanks!
The Wingman has some more precision and power to it while the Rossignol is lighter and quicker. I'd put the Wingman in a slightly higher class of performance with the Rossignol more in the package/rental upgrade section.
I'd say the 166 is going to work out better in the long run. The skis are pretty light and easy to maneuver, so you don't have to downsize to get the quickness.
How do the 80s feel at speed? Chatter or lack of control? I'm an Intermediate skier who's been off the hills for a couple years, but I love bombing fast hills. I want something that will help me get back into the sport but won't hold me back as I re-learn skills and go back to high speed runs.
I think it would be worth moving to at least something like the 82 Basalt for a little more stability at speed from the sounds of it. You might even benefit more from the 82 Ti. This 80 Carbon is a great ski for a lot of intermediates, but doesn't feel particularly stable at speed. Hope that helps!
What is the difference between Men Exp 80 carbon and women's Exp 80 carbon if comparing the same size (166). All specs look the same, including the weight. Will women's be more flexible or the only difference is the color?
Hello! My first ski is the Rossignol Experience W 76 in 152 length. I am 5' 7" and about 175 lbs, skiing in the Northeast. I've been skiing two seasons, but am still skiing easy greens. At some smaller mountains I can go to the top, but others I am struggling with endurance and leg strength. At the larger mountains I am skiing runs from the lifts that go halfway up the mountain. I am starting to look for a second ski to grow with. I am wondering about the Experience 78 in length 162, or Experience 80 in 158 length. Would one of these be better suited for my needs? Thank you!
I'd take a look at the newer Experience 82 Basalt--a bit higher end of a ski that will help in progression but is still very fun. I'd go with the 159 in this ski. www.skiessentials.com/products/2024-rossignol-experience-82-basalt-women-s-skis-w?ski%2520size=143
I found that the 2023 Rossignol Experience 80 carbon skis that I purchased through REI and tuned were stable, tracked well, and fast on the groomed and light powder runs at Breckenridge early March. Always felt in control in all conditions that I encountered in bowls and groomed runs. I could keep up with my 25 year daughter who does not ever find the need to carve or slow down.
Awesome!
I have the last years model and started to get pretty good on it. would say im an upper intermediate really starting to do some advanced skiing. will this ski greatly hold me back? in other words do i need to look into purchasing a more advanced ski or will these still serve me well until they really need to be replaced.
You are always more than welcome to buy new skis, but if the Experience 80 is still working for you, I see no reason to go out of your zone. If you want something similar but better, you can stay in the Experience range up to 86 Ti, which is a high-end premium ski. The 82 Basalt is the next step up from where you're at if you're interested.
Bob/Team, Looking at this ski but 78C version compared to the K2 Disruption 78C. What is the better option of the two for a beginner level skier for strictly groomed and carving? Just subscribed, love the channel.
Thanks, John!
For a true beginner, I think the Rossignol is a better choice, from ease of use to budget standpoints. The K2's benefit is that it'll grow a bit with you, but other than that, I'd think the Rossignol is still a better option.
Hi, I am 167 cm and 16 years old. I’m an intermediate skier and recently purchased these in 158 cm. I am still debating whether to get the 166 or keep the 158 cm. I think I will grow quickly out of them, but in the same time 166 seems to difficult to control…
I'd keep the 158. Better to keep it fun and easy.
Hi Bob! I'm very new to skiing (snowboarded for the past 20 years) and looking to purchase my first pair of skis to skip the rental lines. Just need something to cruise groomers with my little kids who don't go very fast but wouldn't mind something that allows me to learn on my own to get to an intermediate level eventually. I can either get these 80C's or the Basalt 82 for the same price currently. Which would you recommend? Would the 82 Basalt be too much ski for a true beginner? Thanks!
I think the Basalt is fine--if you have snow sliding experience, it carries over.
Hey Team,
I can’t decide between the Elan Wingman 78 C and the Rossignol Experience 78 Ca
Maybe you can help. Thanks for your time.
The Wingman has some more precision and power to it while the Rossignol is lighter and quicker. I'd put the Wingman in a slightly higher class of performance with the Rossignol more in the package/rental upgrade section.
Hi Bob, I am 5'7 and lower intermediate skier. Wondering if I should get the 158cm or 166cm length?
I'd say the 166 is going to work out better in the long run. The skis are pretty light and easy to maneuver, so you don't have to downsize to get the quickness.
How do the 80s feel at speed? Chatter or lack of control? I'm an Intermediate skier who's been off the hills for a couple years, but I love bombing fast hills. I want something that will help me get back into the sport but won't hold me back as I re-learn skills and go back to high speed runs.
I think it would be worth moving to at least something like the 82 Basalt for a little more stability at speed from the sounds of it. You might even benefit more from the 82 Ti. This 80 Carbon is a great ski for a lot of intermediates, but doesn't feel particularly stable at speed. Hope that helps!
not stable, had these for an entire season. Feels dangerous when going fast on scoured terrain near the end of the day
What is the difference between Men Exp 80 carbon and women's Exp 80 carbon if comparing the same size (166). All specs look the same, including the weight. Will women's be more flexible or the only difference is the color?
There really aren't any differences between them aside from color.
Hello! My first ski is the Rossignol Experience W 76 in 152 length. I am 5' 7" and about 175 lbs, skiing in the Northeast. I've been skiing two seasons, but am still skiing easy greens. At some smaller mountains I can go to the top, but others I am struggling with endurance and leg strength. At the larger mountains I am skiing runs from the lifts that go halfway up the mountain. I am starting to look for a second ski to grow with. I am wondering about the Experience 78 in length 162, or Experience 80 in 158 length. Would one of these be better suited for my needs? Thank you!
I'd take a look at the newer Experience 82 Basalt--a bit higher end of a ski that will help in progression but is still very fun. I'd go with the 159 in this ski.
www.skiessentials.com/products/2024-rossignol-experience-82-basalt-women-s-skis-w?ski%2520size=143
I'm wondering if I should get this or Salomon Stance 80. What would u suggest?
The Experience is lighter and lighter-duty. If you're looking to improve and want a ski to grow with you, I'd go with the Stance.
any changes from last years EXP 80 C ?
Nope, that's a carryover ski for them.