Simon Jordan And Danny Murphy DISAGREE Over A 'Manager Sacking Transfer Window' 🔥😤
Vložit
- čas přidán 27. 02. 2024
- Simon Jordan and Danny Murphy debate whether a manager sacking transfer window is a good idea.
Subscribe: / talksport
Enjoyed this CZcams video? 😍
🖥️ talkSPORT's Website: talksport.com/
📲 talkSPORT's Twitter: / talksport
📷 talkSPORT's Instagram: talksport?...
👤 talkSPORT's Facebook: / talksport
📱 talkSPORT's Tik Tok: / talksport
🔴 Download the talkSPORT app HERE! - talksport.com/apps/
🔎 Want to see if you feature on our CZcams channel? Check out our Best talkSPORT callers playlist: • The BEST talkSPORT Cal...
#talkSPORT
#PremierLeague - Sport
They didn't disagree on anything.
Just clicked on it because of the title😄
Imagine being stuck with Wayne Rooney for a whole season 😂
You are stuck with the politicians no matter how incompetent
they clearly said transfer window which is half way through the season
Cant believe none of them made the point that.. players can be sacked/suspended by club at any point. Window is only for the selling players. So why should u have a window for sacking managers
I believe that players can only be sacked or have their contracts terminated if they are deemed to have brought the club into disrepute.
Theyre not talking about sacking in the literal meaning of the word. Players are sacked (contract termination) usually for misconduct where as managers are usually made redundant with their remaining contracts either settled by both parties or placed on gardening leave for the remainder of the contract.
@@adamchowdhury9774 They do this all the time, the only reason they don't get sacked more is because they hold value.
Actually, the window is only for registering players. You can agree a deal to sell a player out of the window, the receiving team just can't register them for their team until the window
@@jtmmmm27 Managers aren't made redundant. Redundancies are when a job role no longer exists and the manager role still does (and is then filled by someone else)
Pretty sure a player can be sacked at anytime too
A player can be sacked on the same terms as a manager.
A sacked manager is paid out
A sacked player is paid out
Whens the disagreement part?
Jim loves asking difficult questions, the grin has is more than funny.
He’s not funny at all he’s a clown 🤡
Imagine hiring 4 or 5 managers so you could bench one if they are out of form
The trouble is managers can easily lose the dressing room. So it would be self-destructive for clubs to endure that.
Sir Simon = Top LAD Proper Clobber 💯 Facts
Sir Spectre and Sir Simon = Top LADS Proper Clobber
@@sammybeck4855 💪😉👍💯 Facts
They agreed. Might wanna change the title.
what are they disagreeing about?
Did Jim write the title of this video?
This sounds great, keep ten hag at Man Utd as long as possible
Yep say the same about eddie howe 😂
If they want to be like players, then we can have transfers also possible by paying transfer fees 😂😂😂
We already have transfer fees for managers. It's not normally as high as a players fee but there's many times that clubs have to pay another club for there manager
You should be able to sack a managwr anytime, but should only be able to appoint permanent managers in the summer and January
Wishes to remain anonymous 😂
Also known as Lank Frampard
Imagine this happens at your club. The owner appoints a manager. The manager does not deliver on what he promised during the appointment process. The manager loses the dressing room. The club start dropping down the league and also losing money, with the predictable knock-on effect that whatever bad things happen this season will have consequences going into next season. All the fans are calling for the manager to be sacked, but he can't be sacked because it's not allowed. The manager falls out with the owner and just doesn't even care anymore and so he runs the club into the ground during the last few months of his contract out of spite and is able to do this because he cannot be removed. The players are unhappy and the whole culture of the club suffers. The club gets relegated and loses millions. The next season, the club fails to secure promotion, etc, etc, etc. And all this becuase the business owner was not allowed to save his own business by sacking a failing manager.
It makes no sense whatsoever to enable such an insane situation as this to be made possible.
Simon absolutely right, you can't compare players to managers - pretty dumb to think you can.
They didn't "disagree". Jordan simply ailed to answer Murphy's question; 'could the FA force owners into only sacking during trans windows'. The answer is quite simple - only if 14 of the 18 PL clubs agree to such a condition.
You can sack players outside windows you just have limits on registering new ones
So if fans want a manager out asap. They will have to continue to boo them from the stands for months until they eventually leave.
In the end fans get rid of the managers because they turn against them so only one outcome
Fans can't literally sack a manager, all they can do is cry about it.
This is incorrect. Players CAN be fired at anytime, the contract can be torn up and paid off anytime, same as a manager. You just can't sell a player to another club at anytime, that's a different arguement.
They didn’t disagree 😂 they agreed if anything
The absolutely 100% completely agreed. Embarrassing video title.
This is a ridiculous conversation. Both players and managers are employees on contracts and have all the protections that their contracts provide. If you're willing and able to pay off their contract you can get rid of either of them anytime you choose.
Ten hag must have been working on this idea for months 😂
They get sacked and paid of 10 million quid for the privilege
Sounds Like Roy Houghson
Who is Roy Houghson? Never heard of him.
ridiculous, of course an employee can be sacked at any point if they are not performing......players arent sacked because they cost to much
What did they disagree on?
Eustace was sacrificed to summon Wayne Rooney and that voodoo didn't work 😅
I like the idea. These owners are responsible for hiring these managers, if you get it wrong and you start failing that’s on YOU.
Do YOUR job correct and appoint the correct people.
So if you own a restaurant and you hire a manager to run the restaurant and they run it terribly, costing you money and damaging your reputation, you have to keep the manager in position because they fooled you into thinking they'd do a good job in their interview? And you have to just watch your business failing until such time that their contract expires and then you can finally sack them? Nah. So why do it in football then?
Can you imagine having a Tuchel type in charge and he loses the dressing room and all the players can't stand him and week upon week more damage is being done to the club but you can't sack him. And Tuchel or whoever knows he's getting sacked in a few months so just doesn't care at all and just runs the club into the ground in the last few months. Even worse, he falls out with the owner and purposely does things to harm the club because he knows he can't be sacked.
What's to like about this idea? Would you like that happening at Millwall?
Players can be sacked at any point in the season.
Just give them 1 year contracts
Simon Jordan dreams of the good ole Elizabethan era
Does it happen in any other industry?
POLITICS.
I for one am delighted that Simon has brought back “dollars for donuts” recently.
He uses too many Americanisms.
Players can be sacked at anytime just like managers. I’m not sure what this conversation is suggesting
Murphy isn’t the brightest spark
dollars for donuts💵🍩🤣
Doesn't happen in any industry why should football be different? It's completely ludicrous
If a chairman sacks the manager he initially appointed, he should go as well
~Brian Clough
Nope
Yeah Clough might have been a bit biased on that one, being a manager and all.
I think it's a fantastic idea
There's always one...
Managers get payoffs in the millions poor them 😂😂 jose mourinho has been paid 77 million in payoffs your right it's totally unfair 😅
I’d actually be fine with this. The reason being it would help stop player power from becoming so rampant. Far too many players quit on managers because the players make so much money and they know they can outlast the manager the vast majority of the time.
Nothing would change there with player power, it would just mean the club would be stuck with a manager that the players aren't working for over a longer period. Doesn't give the manager more authority. Players outlast managers because most players are on 4+ year contracts that the club have to honour regardless of performance, they can't sack them over bad form whereas they do with managers.
As a chelsea fan disagree with this greatly, if you know what i mean😂
When he's not talking I've never seen White go more than 10 seconds without his tongue making an appearance ; a very odd little man
Why do I have a feeling that anonymous manager is-Mikel Arteta of Arsenal.
Danny owns simple Simon
Jordan hates any sort of workers' rights.
what rights are they lacking 😂, if they get sacked they still get paid
What a made up BS conversation about parameters that will NEVER happen for managers...come on TS producers, do better than this drivel...whoever came up with this discussion topic should be sacked.
Simon complains of player power. Managers having a transfer window might balance the playing field
How do you work that out? It won't.
Imagine this happens at your club. The owner appoints a manager. The manager does not deliver on what he promised during the appointment process. The manager loses the dressing room. The club start dropping down the league and also losing money, with the predictable knock-on effect that whatever bad things happen this season will have consequences going into next season. All the fans are calling for the manager to be sacked. But he can't be sacked, it's not allowed. The manager falls out with the owner and just doesn't even care anymore and runs the club into the ground during the last few months of his contract because he cannot be removed. The players are unhappy and the whole culture of the club suffers. The club gets relegated and loses millions. The next season, the club fails to secure promotion, etc, etc, etc. And all this becuase the business owner was not allowed to save his own business by sacking a failing manager. It makes no sense.
Would you want this to happen to your club?