This video might save you hundreds of dollars.
Vložit
- čas přidán 26. 04. 2024
- Thanks to SunPower for sponsoring this video and partnering with me to go solar. If you want to learn what going solar could look like for you, visit:
sunpower.go2cloud.org/aff_c?o...
I hate WoodRiver tools. Ok... hate might be a strong word. But I've had negative experiences with them. But it's been many years since I've used them, and they are significantly less expensive than some of the other brands out there so I wanted to give them a fair and honest reassessment to find out... Is WoodRiver a waste of money?
I have a PATREON! If you want to support this channel and join a great community of woodworkers, you can do so here:
/ encurtis
Check out my new podcast, Woodworking is Bullsh*t, with my good friends Mary Tsai and Paul Jasper: open.spotify.com/episode/6FLO...
If you want to purchase a GO MAKE A THING shirt, or other merch to support the channel, you can find them at the link below:
www.bonfire.com/store/encurtis/
Thanks for watching! If you enjoyed this video please consider supporting my channel by subscribing and hitting that notification bell. It really helps small channels like mine.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Items I use in this video (some are affiliate links which help sponsor this content):
Metal File: amzn.to/44k9P1K
Ohishi Waterstones: amzn.to/3TkoZhP
1,000/8,000 Combo (great budget option): amzn.to/3Lqj7Sh
Inexpensive Honing Guide: amzn.to/3Jo2Uub
Lie-Nieslen Honing Guide: www.lie-nielsen.com/nodes/423... guide
Items I keep on hand in the shop:
Glue:
Titebond I Wood Glue: amzn.to/3zRXHGv
Titebond III Wood Glue: amzn.to/3MVnG6j
Titebond Quick and Thick: amzn.to/42HGuMC
Liquid Hide Glue: amzn.to/3PhZEEW
My Finish Mix:
Minwax Polyurethane: amzn.to/3kPgpuO
Liberon Finishing Oil: amzn.to/3kXkIEf
Danish Oil (alternative): amzn.to/3Njlabs
Liberon Beeswax: amzn.to/3Jm2yFN
Turpentine: amzn.to/3SWFznB
Mineral Spirits (alternative): amzn.to/3oKU83h
Power Tools and Accessories:
Festool Domino: amzn.to/47YEty0
Table Saw Blade - Woodworkers II: amzn.to/42bIOLa
My favorite trim router: amzn.to/3LbCbTF
DeWalt Trim Router fence: amzn.to/43cYwr2
My Festool Router Setup: amzn.to/3ZPIQal
Extra Fence: amzn.to/3KHi9jI
1/2" dia Router bit: amzn.to/3UkRFYI
A Better Alternative (Spiral Up Cut): amzn.to/3mcPsSp
Sharpening:
Ohishi Waterstones: amzn.to/3TkoZhP
1,000/8,000 Combo (great budget option): amzn.to/3Lqj7Sh
Angle Setting Jig Plans: www.lie-nielsen.com/pages/dow...
Inexpensive Honing Guide: amzn.to/3Jo2Uub
Lie-Nieslen Honing Guide: www.lie-nielsen.com/nodes/423... guide
Sandpaper for Flattening: amzn.to/3Jor73F
TotalBoat Epoxy:
For 5% off any TotalBoat product, visit www.totalboat.com/encurtis
You can stay up to date with my work here:
/ encurtis
/ encurtis
encurtis.com/ - Jak na to + styl
An old cabinet maker once told me: “I am not a wealthy man, I cannot afford to buy cheap tools”.
Buy once,cry once.👍🏝️🇨🇦
Buy cheap buy twice...😂
My grandmother used to say: "We are too poor (they really were) to buy cheap".
There will always be a place for cheaper tools, and that is when your neighbor asks to borrow one 🤷♂️
This is why I bought a $30 Stanley Bedrock #5 at an antique store, watched some restoration videos. Restored it, sharpened it and use it. For me as a novice woodworker, $100 is still a huge price to pay.
I have done the same. It definitely takes time to get the old Stanleys clean and sharp, but much of that, for me anyway, was the learning process of getting *any* plane clean and sharp.
Yesterday, I did the dumbest thing ever. I bought a Stanley #45 combo plane. I may even use it someday.
I bought a #4 and a #5 stanley bailey pre-WWII for $70. I then put some Reed adjuster knobs on them, flattened the soles, made some new totes and front knobs and sharpened the blades and they work great with a little adjustment
@christianlibertarian5488 you will, you will. Look up episode s37e12 and 13 of the Woodwright Shop. They will open your eyes to the possibilities.
I have watched several videos on plane restoration and every one that talks about new planes warping is because they don’t let the castings rest (allegedly) before they are machined so they still have internal stress.
@liquidrockaquatics3900
Yes, cast iron will worp over time. My sargent # 424 has a low spot that has showed back up, but the real problem is me observing over .005" hole over 24"
I have been woodworking for over 50 years, spent an inordinate amount of time researching tools before purchasing and have concluded that you just have to acquire something and use it yourself. The key word is USE it. I have invested heavily into LN tools with no regrets. EVERY tool I have ever purchased(hand and power) has had some degree of fettling to get maximum results except the Blue Spruce line of wood chisels which are sharp out of the box. People, the gateway skill is to learn how to sharpen.
When I took my shipwright training, the instructor purposely gave you dull tools.
Now gentlemen we are going to learn how to sharpen your blades.
In Canada, Wood River is distributed through Rob Cosman. A Wood River #4 Smoother runs $369 CDN. A Veritas #4 comes in at $309 CDN with an O1 or A2 blade, $329 CDN for the PM11 version. So at $40 to $60 less for a plane with known quality and known blade steel, I'd have to go with the Veritas.
I actually sold my woodriver and got a Veritas last year. I live about an hour from Robs home/shop and got a #5 before covid. As you mention the Veritas is much cheaper and of significantly superior quality and it ships for free too vs paying for shipping when purchased from Rob
Ripoff rob
That would ABSOLUTELY be a no brainer! Veritas is head and shoulders ahead of Wood River!
In fairness the Woodriver planes Rob sells have been tuned up in their shop. They flatten the soles, chamfer the edges, flatten sharpen and micro-bevel the blade and about a half dozen other tune up steps and that is what you are paying extra for.
When I explored the market for a new plane I also watched a lot of videos here on CZcams to get a good idea of what I was wanting. I didn’t go into the purchase knowing absolutely nothing about the product. I purchased a WoodRiver 5-1/2 and immediately tore it all down for proper cleaning, tuning, sharpening and reassembly. My experience with this plane has been similar to yours out of the gate but with a few minutes work all of those little things are gone and I am left with an exceptionally good plane. Tearing the plane down completely gave me a better understanding about the tool and how it works. Learning online from other’s knowledge gave me the confidence to go at it and I really enjoy using this plane. I would recommend the V3 planes to others if they follow the same procedures. I have had zero issues with the casting, squareness, flatness or any point if operation.
Same! I'd never used a plane (or chisels) but found it very intriguing so I watched several videos on tuning, sharpening, and using planes and chisels. Bought everything I needed, including the exact plane used in this video. Completely broke it down, tuned it, sharpened it, etc. (by following Rob Cosman's instructional video to a T) and so far so good. I actually enjoyed the whole process for the same reasons you state.
The crazy thing to me is. Modern woodworkers do all this talking about plane quality an how well the blade holds up. The type of steel used. An then end up with a 2 thousand dollar certain green sander an dust collection system, doing the final finish work on there project.
#1 it’s “their”
#2 Sometimes you want to use a plane, and sometimes you need to use a sander.
Or you’re like me and you buy the $300 Bosch clone of the green sander and you hook it up to a $100 Ridgid shop vac outfitted with a dust separator and HEPA filter.
I use hand planes fir pretty much every thing. Only really use sand paper for prepping paint finishes or smoothing curves.
I pretty much snipe collector hand planes off of eBay these days for sport.
They rarely get used, but they look killer on the wall.
The trick is to get “caught” observing them by neighbors while holding an eccentric looking coffee cup.
@@3kainosI’m almost positive Bosch came before the rotex, either way, it’s a badass sander and if mine ever goes down, I’m getting a new one. I love the few festool things I have and all my friends that I’ve used, but that Bosch is just amazing
I’ve always appreciated your complete, transparent honesty. “I’ve got a vendetta against Wood River. Let’s call a spade a spade.”
As a beginner I watch a lot of videos. I get most of my info from you and Rob Cosman. (Pretty close to 50/50 and you and he tend to have very different opinions, instruction, sharpening methods, etc.). He swears by his Wood River 5.5. He also has a video on a complete setup. I bought one based on it being in every video. Today I do the setup and initial try out. I think Rob’s affiliation with Woodcraft may be causing a bias. Some of us getting started have to draw a line somewhere because, well, the plane is only one of the many tools you need to get started.
I agree with you when it comes to hand tools I always listen to Rob Cosman. He hasn’t steered me wrong yet. I bought the wood river 5 1/2 also and haven’t been happier. I first bought an old Stanley Bailey no4 from a garage sale and it’s not good for much since I bought the wood river 5 1/2.
Plane coming out the greasy bag is like pulling entire pound of bacon out of the package on a Saturday morning for breakfast.
That, a dozen eggs sunny side up and a stack of flap jacks about half a foot high and I'm ready for another cup of coffee as I head to the shop to start the day making shavings. :)
Bacon makes ALL things better!
Stanley is the standard and we were spoiled forever. We have seen and experienced what a good plane should be. Anything that is lesser is easy to detect.
The people at Woodcraft not knowing what good shavings look like are exactly on brand with Woodcraft
Paul sellers has some excellent videos on how to restore an old plane and how to setup a brand new one. He does the same things re: softening the edges and mouth opening. If you are a beginner it is worth learning these skills so when you run across something at a garage sale you might be able to pick up a diamond in the rough and save a lot of money.
As a beginner CZcams gives you all the knowledge to get a tool up to a decent level these days......Love the PJs
I have a Veritas jack and a Wood river 5 1/2 and find myself reaching for the Wood river twice as often. As for tuning it up I watched CZcams and figured it out shortly. The experience of learning how is worth the effort. Education is worth the investment.
I enjoy your videos and take on life. A bit of humour sets you apart from some other channels and is much appreciated. Wood river planes are actually made by Quangsheng in China. As best as I understand it, they will put a name on the lever cap for a price. I have a No. 7 from Quangsheng and regret buying it, even though I bought it in a sale. The plane took hours to be ready for use: there were sharp edges everywhere, the lateral adjustment didn't work as a result of those sharp edges and I had to get a new lever cap as the original was badly miscast and not machined properly. The pitch on the depth adjuster is quite coarse so it is difficult to set. Making the tote and knob comfortable was also time consuming. I find more pleasure and success in using a 60 odd year old Record number 8 and a £100 No 5 that I bought from Axminster (in the UK) that are made in India. Wood river and Quangsheng are sold as if they are premium planes at a reasonable price, but I am not convinced they are worth the money. In the video, you raise a question about the long term stability of the casting. My experience is that the sole has very slightly twisted over the 6 months I have had it. About 0.1mm to 0.2mm although it still seems to be flat along the length in the middle of the sole. Everyone will have different opinions but I think there are better options. If I have to spend hours fettling the thing, it makes more sense to me (an occasional user) to buy something cheaper or go with a Stanley from ebay.
I live in Parkersburg, WV...the town where WoodCraft is based...and the NUMBER 1 store in here. SO, they have a section where they sell their returned items that are still good. I got a couple of their planes (No 5 and Block) for about 75% off so I have some. HOWEVER, I have ONE Lie Nielsen block plane my father gave me (because I can't afford them) and, for reasons I didn't understand until THIS VIDEO, it's so much easier to dial in than the WR ones. Thanks again for educating me more than anyone else has.
Just got a new woodriver 51/2 a few days ago and as far as i can see it planes wood. Being a big knife person blade steel really doesn't matter as long as its some sort of high carbon. The sharpness isnt going to last forever
I got a 5-1/2. The first casting was not ground flat and square. They shipped a replacement out immediately. Second was perfect. I've been using it for months now and it's an incredibly great tool. It's price makes it an even better value.
I was given advice from a good woodworker at the point I first started playing with wood; get something you know works, so all the screw-up is definitely just you. I have a Veritas low angle jack and a Lie Nielsen block. They do work. They are a joy to use and I know the outcome is determined by my variability not the tools.
Stanley Bailey no.4 - $5 on a garage sale. Stanley Bailey no.5 - $15 at an antique store. Both restored, sharpened. Both work like a dream. Older tools are usually better quality and last ages. Just my thoughts.
It is *Really* hard to find an old Stanley plane at a garage sale these days.
Nice, informative video. I think an infrequent flattening of the base is acceptable routine maintenance. Also, somewhere I got told the blade is T10 steel. This is a steel that is very good, good edge holding, sharpens to decent edge, a bit brittle though. But then it comes down to the hardening process. I have one blade that I have to deburr at each level to ensure only the finest of burr is removed. A heavy burr can infrequently snap away and cause a chipped edge. Other than that the other blades don't give me a problem and they all hold an edge long enough and fine enough for me. These features align with what I expect the characteristics of Chinese T10 would be.
I own a couple Wood Rivers and some Lie Nielsens. I also have a Bench Dog router plane. The Wood Rivers work well for me. I'm glad I bought a Wood River first because it helped me to determine I like half sizes ( 4 1/2, 5 1/2) more than regular sizes. That saved me some money up front. i would have had a Lie Nielsen I didn't like had I bought a No 4 from them. I now try to buy American planes and the Wood River falls out of favor only cause it is made in China, and I can afford not to buy Chinese planes. Overall though Its like you said, Lie Nielsens are ready to go out of the box. The blades need a little honing and you're ready to work. Wood River has some start up time to get them ready but they're not bad planes.
Being a Canadian, Wood River planes end up costing me the same as a Veritas. I have taken the vintage/antique route and spent a lot of time researching online and sweat a lot of hours of restoring Bailey planes. I think this was the best route as a beginner. It's saved me money by buying beaters and tuning them up and it's given me a very solid knowledge on how to make a plane work well. Great video. Love your content!
Picked up a 5-1/2 two years ago and it was junk. So much so that it left a lasting impression on me. I haven’t stepped into a wood craft store since. Maybe I’ll change my mind someday but not today for sure. I ordered a Lie-Nielsen 5-1/2. And I love it
Well well Erik, fair video, I guess. I have been woodworking for over 50 years, own over 60 hand planes from most makers. I have replaced most of my Stanley blades with either Hock or IBC because older thin blades did not perform. Wood Rivers new planes are as good as any today, the blades hold up good in all types of wood. All planes, no matter what maker, need some tuning out of the box. Glad for your videos bud. Semper Fi Mr. X Prius man.
Good points, however I have several old Stanleys. Some I have upgraded to new irons, Hock mostly, and some I haven't. I don't see much different in the actual quality of the cut, I do see a bid difference in the time I can cut with the newer blade. I just don't believe the iron is significantly better if you sharpening properly, however I will agree that the newer blades stay sharper longer.
That's why wood river brought on Rob Cosman as a consultant. Now they're some of the best planes you can buy.
Agreed....the time I've spent trying to learn how, and unsuccessfully getting an old stanley to function well, I should of just spent the money on a good plane !!!
Nice to see you back this week! lol and it looks like you hit up the Downingtown Woodcraft, one of 2 I usually go to depending on where my travels take me when I have a need. ( I'm just about middle between the Downingtown and Wilmington stores) Good video as I have been contemplating getting a newer plane instead of trying to get some older ones I have, restored to a functioning condition. Simply stated, I may just opt for the Veritas or the Lee Nielsen and spend the extra for the simple fact that as you stated, I don't know what I don't know, as a new user, to tune a lesser quality plane to function properly. As always, your videos are informative and very helpful. Thank you sir.
A few years ago, I bought a Stanley No. 5 (a new one, Bailey edition, not the other "normal one" they sell) and a No. 6 (this was the normal edition if you want to refer to it like that). I don't use the #6 since it's mostly a fore plane even after setting it up.
The bailey #5 needed a lot of previous work to make it "top notch", such as flattening the sole, changing the rear and tote, they came out of plastic and I had to make new ones out of wood, bought an English Stanley blade, cleaned the sides and some ergonomics, made sure that the frog sits well, etc...and still needs some tweking here and there but it performs well for most of the time.
After two years or so, I bought a low angle Stanley Sweet Heart and it worked almost flawlessly after an initial sharpening to the blade, and a light cut, leaving a better surface (smoother) than the Bailey.
If we do the math, with all the extra work made to the Bailey, it may have ended up costing almost the same as the SW (or even more if I put a hock blade).
In conclusion, few tools will come ready out of the box, and most of the time we users will have to make some setting up before starting to work (in Canada even RC makes a prep service for those planes before shipping).
Thanks for your review
A great companion video to this would be a Lie Nielsen unboxing. Go through the exact same process minus the drive!
Personal opinion everyone who is interested in hand tools should buy a high end plane for their first one so they can feel how a proper plane should work. Then move into buying old iron and bringing them back to life.
Only problem with Lie Nielsen planes is that they are not always readily available. Always on backorder.
Veritas has the same problem. I've seen their custom bench planes, their box maker's plow plane and their irons go on backorder in the last year or two. If there stuff wasn't so great, I'd give them up. alas...
If you don't mind the restoration work getting a vintage plane and fixing it up is a lot better than a new "prosumer" plane. I managed to get a vintage #4, #5, and a block plane for a great deal and fixed them up in a few hours. One of them could use a modern iron, but that's still cheaper overall.
Great video, Eric! Keep those very informative and entertaining videos coming!!
In my woodworking journeys, I have had a few of the Woodriver planes and generally agree with your review. When I was searching for an affordable #4, I tried the Rockler Benchdog series and they were even worse (so I took it back). I have also tried Stanley Sweetheart series and had to do many of the adjustments you mentioned. I need to choose where my dollars are best spent and so I look at safety, performance and try and reach a reasonable compromise to what I can afford. I enjoy your approach on how you can overcome some (but not all) inconsistencies in the product to reach some satisfactory tuning. We all have much to learn and you do a great job helping me on that journey. Keep up with your excellent guidance.
Hey Eric. I have a few Lie-Nielsen’s (5 1/2 and 7) and Woodrivers (5 1/2, 7 and others). The tool steel that comes with the WR’s is definitely somewhat softer when sharpening so I have to put less effort/strokes/etc into cambering the blade compared to the LN. I imagine after you sharpened it you cambered the blade more than usual and that’s why you were not getting a full width shaving. I don’t think I can tell a huge/significant difference in how long either holds an edge during use but I do think I can use the LN an additional 10 minutes or so before it needs sharpening compared to the WR. I will also say that with minimal modifications, the WR’s perform every bit as well as the LN’s (I might do a comparison video on my channel). I also have Veritas planes but I generally hate using them for two reasons. 1. They are bevel up and I feel like I get better results with bevel down planes and 2. Norris adjusters really suck (for many reasons) in my opinion. Thanks for the video.
Are all Veritas planes bevel up? I wasn’t aware of that, pretty significant difference. I know most of the cos. have bevel up block planes and maybe a bevel up jack plane (?).
@@victoryak86 Veritas makes both bevel up and bevel down planes. All of the Veritas ones that I own are bevel up though.
For me, I like Stanley type 12-14 planes, restored and flattened, with upgraded blades and breakers. I feel like I'm grabbing a piece of history every time I use them. Probably not going to save any money over a WR though. Thanks for the solid handshake in Austin a couple weeks ago👍
Had a Woodriver 5-1/2 that I bought during Rob Cosman's PHP class a few years ago. Worked great! Ended up trading it for an old Stanley 5-1/2 as I have a small collection of Baileys going.
My Baileys are all users that are slowly being replaced by LN though. I've had some Veritas as well. Of all I've had, the LN are my favourite both aesthetically and as users.
Since most of us are capable enough to find your fine channel on YT I have to assume that we are capable enough to find out how to make a hand plane work well. I have a much better opinion of WR hand planes than you, but I also have a much smaller tool budget than you so I'm going to stick with them as they have worked well for me. I did appreciate your grudging lack of bias as you were testing out the number 5. Enjoyed the video, as always.
I got 3 record planes for £25 in moderately bad condition and spent some time fixing them. They're now working great. Would I advise a new woodworker to do this? No
I think you need to look at cheaper planes to see the value that Woodriver brings. I'm a thrifty (i.e. broke) beginner woodworker, and I just finished my first workbench using hardware store hand tools and materials. What I've learned is that most tools will get you where you need to go if you're willing to put in the time, but it can be a lot of time. I've spent a full work week of hours doing nothing but tuning up the plane I bought because anything that could be wrong with it was wrong. The price of a single Lea Neilson is so high that I'll stick to hours and hours of sanding and fitting, but the Woodriver is something that I might be able to swing.
Thanks for your review. I don’t know how to say this without sounding like a “No Chinese tools for me”, but that is pretty much where I stand and I can live with that. After nearly 40 years of cabinetmaking I have found that generally “Made in China” means lower quality, in both longevity and fit & finish. Lastly, I just cannot bring myself to support the CCP.
Especially when there are thousands of vintage restored (or DIY) planes for the same or less $$$. Thx.
Man I couldn’t agree more. From CZcamsrs being paid by temu to all these companies shipping overseas. I gotta say, tiawan is an exception. They are advanced. But anything from China tool related is GARBAGE buy American or better yet Canadian. They are almost CCP as a govt but the people are awesome.
I love my lie-neilsen #4 plane which is now over 10 years old. I am a hobbyist woodworker and use a planer/jointer if I need to work large surfaces, and then follow up with a cabinet scraper.
Thanx for an honest video and your honest opinion. The prep work required reminded me of the saying "All tools come as kits that need assembly, some more than others." The shavings seem to be split indicating a nick in the blade. Rob Cosman did some great videos on sharpening about 3 years ago on how to avoid these nicks.
Rob Cosman explains that even small serrations (barely visible scratches that extend to the micro bevel) cause splits in the shavings. In his setup video he filed the edges of the sole as well as the throat and flushed up the lever cal and chip breaker. I doubt any tool you get anywhere is 100% ready to go out of the box. I have a Veritas apron plane and the blade was in no different condition than the Wood River. Still had to flatten and polish the back (not the whole back just the micro bevel area). I follow his sharpening method that goes up to a 16000 grit Shapton. I would probably say the Wood River is at the low end of high end planes. Which I think is what Erik is saying too.
Everything is relative in WVA. I learned planes on Stanley Handymans, and my 1st new buy was a new Bailey-cheapo-version from Rockler. Needless to say, when I gave WR a try I spent way less time with sole/blade flattening than any Stanley I own...I was happy. But that will only last as long as I stay away from LN or Veritas, haha.
I am a retired mechanic. When I was first starting, I purchased Craftsman tools. I could not afford Snap-on. Later, I learned the huge difference between the two tools. Yes, the Snap-on is far superior, however, the Craftsman tools that I started with still work and have lasted me 35 years. The Wood River may be the equivalent of a Craftsman...pretty good, just not professional grade.
I have a Woodriver 5-1/2 among, also some Lie Nielsens for other bench planes and Veritas for speciality planes. The Woodriver bench planes are 'ok.' I started with a 4 and 5 and sold them. I actually think the blades aren't bad. But I 100% had to flatten the back befor use. I actually like it more than a Hock blade but less than Veritas PMV-11. Close, but not quite, to the quality of LN's blades. If you do a lot hand tool work, I think you'll be upgrading at some point to LN or Veritas anyway. If I had to do it again, I'd start with LN or Veritas. They hold their value so you can always sell them and get most of your money back. Not so with Woodriver.
Thank you so much for your video! It ties nicely with a recent project of my own. I bought an Amazon basics #5 plane… 😖
Needless to say, for the significant saving in cost, the blade was not ground square. I spent last week educating myself on plane restoration, purchased a lapping plate and rolls of sandpaper to properly grind the blade. It now makes shavings 1/1000 of an inch! Thank you for sharing your passion for woodworking! 😊
Sidenote, I had two planes my uncle gave me that needed their blades properly squared as well. One was so bad I had to use several pieces of 180 grit paper on the lapping plate just to get the edge square 😬👍
Then I worked my way up to the 400/1000 grit wetstones. I also like to use a few drops of Trend Lapping Fluid to help lift the metal dust off the wetstone.
I must admit I have a bias for everything Lee Valley. It’s 10 minutes drive, my wife worked there for awhile and the tools are fantastic. I use birthday money to purchase tools or I have had the fortune of finding estate sales with the veritas tools for sale really cheap. I don’t think I’d buy anything else.
The iron that comes with it is A2. It’s very hard to sharpen, and when it starts to dull, the blade chips out. Once you soften the edges and put a different blade in, it works well.
I'm pretty sure i saw a Rob Cosman said in one of his videos that Wood Craft came to him several years ago, and asked him to help them redesign their line of wood river planes. That may be the reason they are a better plane now than it was 15 years ago.
In Canada that plane is roughly $424.00 sold by Rob Cosman and ready to go right out of the box , so about a hundred dollars more than a Veritas
I happen to love my WR 5 1/2 and low angle block. They are excellent.
Bought a WR #4 and it was total crap even after fettling. I will stick to my Stanleys for "rough" planing and my 1800's British and Scottish infill planes for the final touches..
great video. ive been to that woodcraft but I typically go to the one in Wilmington.
When I first started hand tool woodworking, I bought Wood River #5 1/2 and a block plane. Both served me very well; I still own them and use them. Yes, I was inspired by Rob Cosman and he has all the videos to help tune the plane. As I got “better” at the craft, I bought a Lie-Nielsen smoother and block plane. I like the L-N block plane because it’s smaller and has finer blade adjuster. And the L-N smoother is a dream in the hand. So all being equal, I reach for the L-N just because I like them better. I don’t think they function so much better, they are just my favorites. To be honest, I run IBC irons in all my bench planes. My point, I don’t think I would buy Wood River now. I’m too impressed with L-N and can afford the price. But I would highly recommend Wood River to beginners and those who are budget conscious.
Good to know from someone who actually went down the same path I'm looking at right now. I think I'll just save up and get the LN, because I'm sick of having multiples of tools since I bought a cheap version originally and shortly after went and got a better version.
@@505Daniel Certainly buy what you like, need and can afford. I do have specific times when I choose 5 1/2 over the 4 and vice versa. And I’ve never thought about replacing my Wood River with a L-N. The Wood River is more than adequate at meeting my expectations. It like if I’m hauling hay I’ll choose my 83 GMC. But if I’m going to church, I grab the Denali.
Without all that oil, it would be full of rust, coming across the ocean from Asia.
As always another great video. I for one have some very cheap plans. And I think my take away is what to look for and setup. So thank you. But now the cup is empty so it is time to make a thing. Tell next week my friend. Thanks again.
My experience with the same WR #5 (purchased in late 2023 on a $40 discount sale) is similar. I like the fact that it's got the full frog plate of the Stanley Bedrock design, unlike most of its mid-price competitors; that design should make it much more robust. Importantly, the sole and sides were flat out of the box. Like you, however, I found the plane was creating tiny ridges (striations) in the wood when planing, and so I spent time filing the sole edges and mouth. I also realized I needed to round off the corners of the blade on this (and my other planes that I inherited) to avoid the striation marks. Most CZcams teachers do not mention this need, I've found, but I'm glad I did it. Took quite a while to get all these cleaned up. Once I did, and after a few rounds of sharpening the blade so that it had proper sharpness and camber, I finally began to get the papery shavings I'd been hoping for. It's now planing very nicely.
As you said, the front handle isn't perfect; shorter would be better. Ergonomically, overall the plane is not bad but could be better. I haven't yet found a very comfortable hand position when using it with a shooting board, but it's okay for short sessions. I also found the depth adjuster a bit stiff, but it works fine.
All in all, I feel like I got a good product for much less than the higher-end competition. I don't have experience with Lie-Nielsen or Veritas planes, sadly, so can't compare. I would not have paid their higher prices as a fairly new woodworker, so this seems a sweet spot for me.
Thanks for the thorough review! And also thanks for promoting renewable energy. 👍💥
That’s funny I have a wood river number 5 and can’t get an even shaving too safe my life. It seems the blade is either bent or won’t stay even
Eric, I bought a Woodriver 5 1/2 and a block plane. I must admit, I didn’t even look at the outer sleeve on the box bit I take your point. The 5 1/2 works pretty well. I have knocked the edges off it but not much more. I can get a sharp edge on the blade but I find it slight “crumbly” and likely to cause tracks even when it hasn’t been nicked on anything. I think I will be swapping it for a Hock blade. I simply could not get on with the “knuckle” adjuster on the block blade or the lack of lateral adjustment so the has been sold on.
I have the WoodRiver #4 v3 plane. Overall happy with it - I did get a Hock chip breaker later on. For my budget, I got it on sale and it does the job. I know that Veritas and Lie Nielson will blow it out of the water, but bang for the buck it works. I did some fine tuning with the blade and sole to make sure everything was flat. It was slathered in oil though, which took a while to wipe up.
Rob Cosman has a great out-of-the-box tune-up video for woodriver planes. That was enough to get my #6 working fantastically. My only complaint is the side of the body isn't a perfect 90 degrees, so it's difficult to adjust the skew of the blade for a shooting board
Well, a couple of points. First, I am wondering if your first Woodriver planes were pre Rob Cossman. I know he had them make some changes in it when he was hired as a consultant or what ever he did with them. I am surprised that right out of the box, after wiping the oil off, you did not put straight edges on it, both for length and width. I do have a #5, and like you, I would not give it a 10, but then I never give anything a 10.... I do not care for the handle/tote in the back. The curve on the bottom hits a pressure point on the heel of that hand, so I have to adjust my grip. Not sure about the front knob. I am fairly new to hand planes, maybe 2 years. I do consider it part of the learning curve on them to be able to trouble shoot them before you ever start to use them. My dad gave me his Lie Nielson planes which he bought and never used due to mom's dementia which pretty much kept him out of his shop, though he never got into woodworking like I have. I did go through them, and take them apart and sharpen all of them. This was along with some used ones that I picked up at the local flea market. It does work, and I really can't tell if the plane blade is any better than any of the other planes I have. One needed skill for hand planes is to be able to take them apart and fix them so they work the way you want them to do.
Thank you, Erik. Ive been curious for some time why you have seemed to so hate Woodriver planes. I currently have a set of Woodriver planes (4 thru 7; including the 4 1/2 and 5 1/2) and the block plane, and absolutely love them. But that’s just me, and the glory of humanity is that we are all different. You rock!
Thanks for the video Eric,I think you’ve given the plane a fair revue.👍👍
I invested in the English market variant of the WoodRiver 51/2 last September with a clump of vouchers I received as a birthday present. I have to say I have been pleasantly surprised with the tools performance. It did need a little fettling much like the ones in this video but 8 months in it still takes beautiful shavings and leaves a pristine finish that would be hard to achieve with abrasives. Great work as ever Erik.
Thanks for making the video. I have the WR#5 and after doing the same tune up you did and Rob Cosman recommends it’s works well but I’m not overly impressed with it. I bought a Veritas low angle jack plane and it was a revelation to use a high quality tool. Entertaining and informative as always. Going forward I will only buy Veritas or LN. I would rather have fewer but better tools than more stuff.
I started my woodworking journey watching Cosman and he swears by Woodriver, though i live in UK and they're marketed in Europe as Luban. Though UK has laws about manufacturing quality (handplanes have to be within a specific level of flatness to be sold here etc), the whole made in China thing really put me off. Decided to pay the extra money and go for a Clifton, made in Sheffield, few hours drive south from me and i know it will have been made to a high quality, easy pick for me. Not to say Luban/Woodriver is bad, a lot of guys like Aussie Woodshed have had good experiences with Luban, obviously they point out some flaws but for the price seem good.
They might be made in the same factory, but they are not the same. The casting is clearly different: czcams.com/video/5a7IJu4hDWM/video.html
BRO, i never watch the maker ads but yours was hilarious. great review as well.
life the efforts for your sponsor!
The Woodriver planes are the best budget alternative to Lie-Nielsen planes in my opinion. Rob Cosman helped design them, modeling them after the original Stanley Bedrock planes. I prefer the heavy oil honestly, as it shows care was taken to prevent rust. Wiping it off is not a concern to me. With a little set up like beveling the sharp edges and sharpening the blade, the Woodriver planes are the best bang for your buck to me. Thanks for the honest review.
A somewhat easy test of hardness would be to take known steels and to see what can scratch what. If it gets scratched, it's softer. I got started with a couple of vintage Stanleys that I got functional, but I wouldn't say that I have them tuned.
I really appreciate the review and the knowledge.
Thought it was really funny when you commented on the handles cause they look just like any other to me. I'm sure hands on is different and a more experienced/refined eye I'm sure sees what you mean. But it looked just like the Lie-Nielsen's to me
I bought my 1st hand plane a few months ago (#6) that was a Woodriver based on Rob Cosman and his setup videos. And to my surprise, the cut quality was right on vs out of the box which was really bad. I do have my eye on a Lie Nielsen 4 1/2 as my next that is 2 plus times the cost of my Woodriver I got on sale. So to me, the Woodriver is an exceptional value when considering the price. A little setup helps a newbie like me learn how a plane works too.
Rob cosman had a hand in the redesign. I have the newer lower angle block plane and its great. Their blades leave a little to be desired for hard woods. I have a record no.7 that i have a love hate relationship and will ultimately be getting a woodriver to replace it if replacing the chip breaker doesnt get rid of my last couple of issues
At this point in my hobby, I have the #3 through the #8, all vintage stanleys from before WWII. They are fantastic and I love using them, and I've never spent more than 100$ on any individual one, the most expensive being the #8. I really would love to try out one of the new, high end hand planes, but I'm sure not willing to spend so much when what I have works so darn well.
I do want to get some new blades though, the hock blades on my #3 and #8 are really nice.
I got a Juuma No7 last year, half the price on my Clifton planes, not as refined as the Clifton, but works every bit as well
Why does it seem like we are learning to be a Tool Snob with this one? When funds are low and when you are learning and And, when what you are really buying is from some old dude's garage....well this one looks good to me.
Anything fanceir than some old guys garage, is a bit of a snob. Unlesss it is a cheapy big box door stop.
All that kind of fits with his summary at the end.... doesn't seem tool snob at all
If you still have to modify it and make those adjustments, why not save even more moeny and do the same thing to a cheaper Stanley plane?
The newer Stanley’s are pretty bad. The Woodriver is a huge step up. The Stanley’s have plastic handles (knob was already broken when I opened the box) the iron was unserviceable so I used the one from the Woodriver and bought a hock blade.
@@jerrybrown1446 Wow. Have they become Chinese Junk now? I bought a #5 about 6 years ago and it did need a little flattening but the handles are wood and everything else works fine. Other than looking newer, it looks abot the same as the ones I've have from my Dad and Grandfather.
@@johnmcdougald1238 The website says “made in USA with global materials”. If you start out with a Stanley, the amount of time and money you spend on it will set you back a long way.
I almost busted a gut over the dragon pajamas 😂❤
Some have a good sense of humor and some a bad sense of humor, while some other's have none at all - humor or sense. His PJ's may be weird but at least he's trying.
Did want to mention that I kept the wood river plane because I spent about a full day getting it up to a reasonable level. It does take a ok shaving but doesn’t compare to either my Lie-Nielsen or any of my Veritas planes. Was it worth the price no not at all.
Quangsheng, Luban, and Wood River, from what I can find, are all made in the same factory, CIXI city Qiangsheng tool co., in China. Woodcraft has an exclusive distributor agreement in the USA so you'll never see the other brands ones available for sale in the USA. From what I understand they are all about the same in quality, unless a retailer is providing different specifications for their store brand planes.
I've picked up a few of the Luban and Quangsheng planes and they are similar in quality as to how what you've shown in your review. If I run across an used one cheap enough I might buy it to try it out, but I really don't need anymore planes at this point.
Quangsheng / woodriver seem to be very similar (if not identical ) , I bought a 4 1/2 when I just started out with the notion to upgrade to a veritas model when i could afford it , I had similar results you had out the box .
After attending school to learn how to "tune up" the plane and actually learn what sharp is!
Mine took about 1/2 day of fettling to get it up to furniture makers standard . lapping the sole on float glass , flattening the blade and getting to up to standard .
Was that 1/2 day worth the cost difference of the veritas / lie nelson , I think so.
Metals: O1 (the "O") means OIL hardening--great steel containing excellent additive elements. A1 (the "A") means AIR hardening--also great steel with additional elements. Carbon steel, means "plain carbon steel," as in, simply iron plus plain old carbon--which is pretty good stuff; it hardens well in oil, but NO other strengthening elements (a tiny bit of manganese).
Can you do a video on how to make that sharpening station? 🙏🏻
Great video on how to tune up a plane less on how to tune up planes in general (as this doesn’t apply to just wood river). More you pay the less you need to do to it.
I aspire to be able to spend that much on any plane. The depressing part is that's the budget friendly plane.
Better be careful with that taking a knee. I turned 43 this past Feb and blew out my knee this past week standing up out of my recliner haha. Anyway, great video.
I'm in the process of restoring a #3, #5 & #7 Stanley I got for free. Does need a fair amount of love but I hope to get it as nice as that.
I bought a Stanley sweet heart for £250 and an Amazon £20 Bangladesh special plane and I use the Amazon one way more than the Stanley.
Great video as always Erik as a new woodworker I would like to have a couple of planes just don’t know witch to buy and get them working so this helps a lot thanks for sharing
I go to the woodcraft in wilmington del.i assume this is the one in downington. I asked the same thing about why the planes are not in sight. They told me when they un package them they start to rust and it is a pain to get off.
Oh, one more thing. I got one of the Bridge City planes, just because I had to have one. Mine had a huge dip in the middle, like totally unsatisfactory. I sent it back, and they sent me another one that had the exact same problem. I heard from Stumpy Nubs that they have 'fixed' that, but I still won't buy another one. If they don't have the quality control down for 'out the door' then the product is not worth the effort of fixing, especially for that price. It is a very 'strange' set up. Nothing is normal. Rex Krueger did a review of it and the one he got had the same problem.
They're a gimmick. Avoid at all cost.
I am some one who has to experiment, and can afford to try things just to see how they work. While it has some good ideas, I don't care for it. Some day I will flatten the sole and give it a good work out.
Eric, thanks for this video. I know it was hard for you to walk back earlier harsh comments on Woodriver. I have a no. 6 and no. 4 that I am pretty happy with. In the future, I would like to try a Lee Nielsen plane but I’m an old guy just struggling to maintain a decent life and there are so many tools to buy.
Concerning packaging, I think the plastic and grease are probably a good thing. Once the plane is finished it may need to stay in inventory for some time and that packaging should protect it till I get it home. I know that many food products are packed in nitrogen-an inert gas-to avoid oxidation. Even beer is legged in nitro to maintain quality. Maybe there’s nitrogen in that bag?
Anyway, the only problem with my planes is the lateral adjustment lever: it seems the iron shifts on the frog and I have to constantly adjust to avoid gouging the wood. That’s probably owing to my lack of skill.
I am now considering a low angle plane with an adjustable mouth to deal with some difficult wood and a Lee Nielsen would be my first choice.
I have the Dictum planes, which are from the same manufacturer. They arrive clean, work out of the box...just need honing the blade. If you are happy with your Narex chisels( I am), this plane should be fine too.
Hmmm . . . $180 initial investment, plus $50 for a decent blade when the WR factory one doesn’t hold an edge. Add in 6-12 months of frustration. Finally, ponying up $350 for a LV or LN. $580 for the Wood River seems kinda expensive. It took me several experiences of buying “inexpensive” tools to learn that costly lesson.
As a hobbyist woodworker and pensioner, I have 2 #5 bench planes that took several hours of CZcams taught fettling and tweaking, to work to my inexperienced satisfaction, and they cost about the same as that. And they live in a plastic tote in a damp storge shed. Are they heirloom quality not in the least. Will they continue to work, oh yah. I wipe the dust off then use the oil rag in a can after use. PS I live across the pond so I'm sure the import duties would be up there. Nice review. Take care & stay safe Curtis.
I've been looking into hand planes as a beginner. From everything I've read about them, they don't seem like a good pick for a beginner.
You can go with an expensive one which still requires sharpening (hope you don't mess that your expensive tool). Or you can buy a mid range one and need to do all these adjustments. Regardless, I don't think I'm going to bother with one until I get more experience with other things.
The nice thing about a cheap saw is it still works out of the box. And I don't have to worry about messing up my cheap chisels because they were just $10. But a "beginner hand plane" is starting to sound like an oxymoron to me.
I can't justify spending anymore than $50 on a hand plane knowing that almost every antique shop or flea market in the Smokey Mountains is bound to have a pre WWII Stanley
I have old Stanley planes, a #4, #5, #6 and #7. I didn’t pay more than $60 for any one of them and with some light restoration they all work insanely well. I’ll just stick with my old Stanleys. 😎